References

Richard J. Haier

doi:10.1017/9781316105771.009

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 July 2017

Richard J. Haier

Show author details

Richard J. Haier: Affiliation:
University of California, Irvine

Book contents

Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Type: Chapter
Information: The Neuroscience of Intelligence , pp. 210 - 242

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316105771.009 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackerman, P. L., Beier, M. E. & Boyle, M. O. (2005). Working memory and intelligence: The same or different constructs? Psychological Bulletin, 131, 30–60.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Alkire, M. T. & Haier, R. J. (2001). Correlating in vivo anaesthetic effects with ex vivo receptor density data supports a GABAergic mechanism of action for propofol, but not for isoflurane. British Journal of Anaesthesiology, 86, 618–626.Google Scholar

Alkire, M. T., Haier, R. J., Barker, S. J., Shah, N. K., Wu, J. C. & Kao, Y. J. (1995). Cerebral metabolism during propofol anesthesia in humans studied with positron emission tomography. Anesthesiology, 82, 393–403; discussion 27A.Google Scholar

Alkire, M. T., Haier, R. J. & Fallon, J. H. (2000). Toward a unified theory of narcosis: brain imaging evidence for a thalamocortical switch as the neurophysiologic basis of anesthetic-induced unconsciousness. Consciousness and Cognition, 9, 370–386.Google Scholar

Alkire, M. T., Pomfrett, C. J. D., Haier, R. J., Gianzero, M. V., Chan, C. M., Jacobsen, B. P. & Fallon, J. H. (1999). Functional brain imaging during anesthesia in humans – effects of halothane on global and regional cerebral glucose metabolism. Anesthesiology, 90, 701–709.Google Scholar

Anderson, D. J. (2012). Optogenetics, sex, and violence in the brain: implications for psychiatry. Biological Psychiatry, 71, 1081–1089.Google Scholar

Anderson, J. W., Johnstone, B. M. & Remley, D. T. (1999). Breast-feeding and cognitive development: a meta-analysis. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 70, 525–535.Google Scholar

Andreasen, N. C., Flaum, M., Swayze, V., O’Leary, D. S., Alliger, R., Cohen, G., Ehrhardt, J. & Yuh, W. T. (1993). Intelligence and brain structure in normal individuals. American Journal of Psychiatry, 150, 130–134.Google Scholar PubMed

Ángeles Quiroga, M., Escorial, S., Román, F. J., Morillo, D., Jarabo, A., Privado, J., Hernández, M., Gallego, B. & Colom, R. (2015). Can we reliably measure the general factor of intelligence (g) through commercial video games? Yes, we can! Intelligence, 53, 1–7.Google Scholar

Arden, R. (2003). An Arthurian romance. In Nyborg, H. (Ed.), The Scientific Study of General Intelligence, Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar

Arden, R., Chavez, R. S., Grazioplene, R. & Jung, R. E. (2010). Neuroimaging creativity: a psychometric view. Behavior and Brain Research, 214, 143–156.Google Scholar

Arden, R., Luciano, M., Deary, I. J., Reynolds, C. A., Pedersen, N. L., Plassman, B. L., McGue, M., Christensen, K. & Visscher, P. M.(2015). The association between intelligence and lifespan is mostly genetic. International Journal of Epidemiology, 45, 178–185.Google Scholar

Asbury, K. & Plomin, R. (2014). G is for Genes: The Impact of Genetics on Education and Achievement, Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Asbury, K., Wachs, T. D. & Plomin, R. (2005). Environmental moderators of genetic influence on verbal and nonverbal abilities in early childhood. Intelligence, 33, 643–661.Google Scholar

Ashburner, J. & Friston, K. (1997). Multimodal image coregistration and partitioning – a unified framework. Neuroimage, 6, 209–217.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Ashburner, J. & Friston, K. J. (2000). Voxel-based morphometry – the methods. Neuroimage, 11, 805–821.Google Scholar

Aston-Jones, G. & Deisseroth, K. (2013). Recent advances in optogenetics and pharmacogenetics. Brain Research, 1511, 1–5.Google Scholar

Atherton, M., Zhuang, J. C., Bart, W. M., Hu, X. P. & He, S. (2003). A functional MRI study of high-level cognition. I. The game of chess. Cognitive Brain Research, 16, 26–31.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Au, J., Sheehan, E., Tsai, N., Duncan, G. J., Buschkuehl, M. & Jaeggi, S. M. (2015). Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory: a meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 22, 366–377.Google Scholar

Bagot, K. S. & Kaminer, Y. (2014). Efficacy of stimulants for cognitive enhancement in non-attention deficit hyperactivity disorder youth: a systematic review. Addiction, 109, 547–557.Google Scholar

Barbey, A. K., Colom, R., Paul, E., Forbes, C., Krueger, F., Goldman, D. & Grafman, J. (2014). Preservation of general intelligence following traumatic brain injury: contributions of the Met66 brain-derived neurotrophic factor. PLoS ONE, 9, e88733.Google Scholar

Barnett, W. S. & Hustedt, J. T. (2005). Head start’s lasting benefits. Infants and Young Children, 18, 16–24.Google Scholar

Bassett, D. S., Yang, M., Wymbs, N. F. & Grafton, S. T. (2015). Learning-induced autonomy of sensorimotor systems. Nature Neuroscience, 18, 744–751.Google Scholar

Basso, A., De Renzi, E., Faglioni, P., Scotti, G. & Spinnler, H. (1973). Neuropsychological evidence for the existence of cerebral areas critical to the performance of intelligence tasks. Brain, 96, 715–28.Google Scholar

Basten, U., Hilger, K. & Fiebach, C. J. (2015). Where smart brains are different: a quantitative meta-analysis of functional and structural brain imaging studies on intelligence. Intelligence, 51, 10–27.CrossRef Google Scholar

Basten, U., Stelzel, C. & Fiebach, C. J. (2013). Intelligence is differentially related to neural effort in the task-positive and the task-negative brain network. Intelligence, 41, 517–528.Google Scholar

Bates, T. C., Lewis, G. J. & Weiss, A. (2013). Childhood socioeconomic status amplifies genetic effects on adult intelligence. Psychological Science, 24, 2111–2116.Google Scholar

Batty, G. D., Deary, I. J. & Gottfredson, L. S. (2007). Premorbid (early life) IQ and later mortality risk: systematic review. Annals of Epidemiology, 17, 278–288.Google Scholar

Beaty, R. E. (2015). The neuroscience of musical improvisation. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 51, 108–117.Google Scholar

Bejjanki, V. R., Zhang, R., Li, R., Pouget, A., Green, C. S., Lu, Z. L. & Bavelier, D. (2014). Action video game play facilitates the development of better perceptual templates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111, 16961–16966.Google Scholar

Bengtsson, S. L., Csikszentmihalyi, M. & Ullen, F. (2007). Cortical regions involved in the generation of musical structures during improvisation in pianists. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 830–842.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Benyamin, B., Pourcain, B., Davis, O. S., Davies, G., Hansell, N. K., Brion, M. J., et al. (2014). Childhood intelligence is heritable, highly polygenic and associated with FNBP1L. Molecular Psychiatry, 19, 253–258.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Berkowitz, A. L. & Ansari, D. (2010). Expertise-related deactivation of the right temporoparietal junction during musical improvisation. Neuroimage, 49, 712–719.Google Scholar

Bishop, S. J., Fossella, J., Croucher, C. J. & Duncan, J. (2008). COMT val158met genotype affects recruitment of neural mechanisms supporting fluid intelligence. Cerebral Cortex, 18, 2132–2140.Google Scholar

Bogg, T. & Lasecki, L. (2015). Reliable gains? Evidence for substantially underpowered designs in studies of working memory training transfer to fluid intelligence. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1589.Google Scholar

Bohlken, M. M., Brouwer, R. M., Mandl, R. C., Van Haren, N. E., Brans, R. G., Van Baal, G. C., et al. (2014). Genes contributing to subcortical volumes and intellectual ability implicate the thalamus. Human Brain Mapping, 35, 2632–2642.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Boivin, M. J., Giordani, B., Berent, S., Amato, D. A., Lehtinen, S., Koeppe, R. A., Buchtel, H. A., Foster, N. L. & Kuhl, D. E. (1992). Verbal fluency and positron emission tomographic mapping of regional cerebral glucose metabolism. Cortex, 28, 231–239.Google Scholar

Bouchard, T. J. (2009). Genetic influence on human intelligence (Spearman’s g): how much? Annals of Human Biology, 36, 527–544.Google Scholar

Bouchard, T. J., Jr. (1998). Genetic and environmental influences on adult intelligence and special mental abilities. Human Biology, 70, 257–279.Google Scholar

Bouchard, T. J., & McGue, M. (1981). Familial studies of intelligence: a review. Science, 212, 1055–1059.Google Scholar

Brans, R. G. H., Kahn, R. S., Schnack, H. G., Van Baal, G. C. M., Posthuma, D., Van Haren, N. E. M., et al. (2010). Brain plasticity and intellectual ability are influenced by shared genes. Journal of Neuroscience, 30, 5519–5524.Google Scholar

Brodmann, K. (1909). Vergleichende Lokalisationslehre der Grosshirnrinde in ihren Prinzipien dargestellt auf Grund des Zellenbaues, Leipzig: Barth.Google Scholar

Burgaleta, M. & Colom, R. (2008). Short-term storage and mental speed account for the relationship between working memory and fluid intelligence. Psicothema, 20, 780–785.Google Scholar

Burgaleta, M., MacDonald, P. A., Martinez, K., Roman, F. J., Alvarez-Linera, J., Gonzalez, A. R., Karama, S. & Colom, R. (2014). Subcortical regional morphology correlates with fluid and spatial intelligence. Human Brain Mapping, 35, 1957–1968.Google Scholar

Burt, C. (1943). Ability and income. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 13, 83–98.CrossRef Google Scholar

Burt, C. (1955). The evidence for the concept of intelligence. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 25, 158–177.Google Scholar

Burt, C. (1966). The genetic determination of differences in intelligence – a study of monozygotic twins reared together and apart. British Journal of Psychology, 57, 137–153.Google Scholar

Cabeza, R. & Nyberg, L. (2000). Imaging cognition II: an empirical review of 275 PET and fMRI studies. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 1–47.CrossRef Google Scholar

Cajal, R. S. (1924). Pensamientos Escogidos [Chosen Thoughts], Madrid: Cuadernos Literarios.Google Scholar

Campbell, F. A., Pungello, E., Miller-Johnson, S., Burchinal, M. & Ramey, C. T. (2001). The development of cognitive and academic abilities: growth curves from an early childhood educational experiment. Developmental Psychology, 37, 231–242.Google Scholar

Cardoso-Leite, P. & Bavelier, D. (2014). Video game play, attention, and learning: how to shape the development of attention and influence learning? Current Opinions in Neurology, 27, 185–191.Google Scholar

Cattell, R. B. (1971). Abilities: Their Structure, Growth, and Action, Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar

Cattell, R. B. (1987). Intelligence: Its Structure, Growth, and Action, Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Ceci, S. J. (1991). How much does schooling influence general intelligence and its cognitive components – a reassessment of the evidence. Developmental Psychology, 27, 703–722.Google Scholar

Ceci, S. J. & Williams, W. M. (1997). Schooling, intelligence, and income. American Psychologist, 52, 1051–1058.CrossRef Google Scholar

Chabris, C. F. (1999). Prelude or requiem for the “Mozart effect”? Nature, 400, 826–827.Google Scholar

Chabris, C. F., Hebert, B. M., Benjamin, D. J., Beauchamp, J., Cesarini, D., Van Der Loos, M., et al. (2012). Most reported genetic associations with general intelligence are probably false positives. Psychological Science, 23, 1314–1323.Google Scholar

Champagne, F. A. & Curley, J. P. (2009). Epigenetic mechanisms mediating the long-term effects of maternal care on development. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 33, 593–600.Google Scholar

Chiang, M. C., Barysheva, M., McMahon, K. L., De Zubicaray, G. I., Johnson, K., Montgomery, G. W., et al. (2012). Gene network effects on brain microstructure and intellectual performance identified in 472 twins. Journal of Neuroscience, 32, 8732–8745.Google Scholar

Chiang, M. C., Barysheva, M., Shattuck, D. W., Lee, A. D., Madsen, S. K., Avedissian, C., et al. (2009). Genetics of brain fiber architecture and intellectual performance. Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 2212–2224.Google Scholar

Chiang, M. C., Barysheva, M., Toga, A. W., Medland, S. E., Hansell, N. K., James, M. R., et al. (2011a). BDNF gene effects on brain circuitry replicated in 455 twins. Neuroimage, 55, 448–454.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Chiang, M. C., McMahon, K. L., De Zubicaray, G. I., Martin, N. G., Hickie, I., Toga, A. W., Wright, M. J. & Thompson, P. M. (2011b). Genetics of white matter development: a DTI study of 705 twins and their siblings aged 12 to 29. Neuroimage, 54, 2308–2317.Google Scholar

Choi, Y. Y., Shamosh, N. A., Cho, S. H., DeYoung, C. G., Lee, M. J., Lee, J. M., Kim, S. I., Cho, Z. H., Kim, K., Gray, J. R. & Lee, K. H. (2008). Multiple bases of human intelligence revealed by cortical thickness and neural activation. Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 10323–10329.Google Scholar

Chooi, W. T. & Thompson, L. A. (2012). Working memory training does not improve intelligence in healthy young adults. Intelligence, 40, 531–542.Google Scholar

Chugani, H. T., Phelps, M. E. & Mazziotta, J. C. (1987). Positron emission tomography study of human brain functional development. Annals of Neurology, 22, 487–497.Google Scholar

Clark, V. P., Coffman, B. A., Mayer, A. R., Weisend, M. P., Lane, T. D., Calhoun, V. D., Raybourn, E. M., Garcia, C. M. & Wassermann, E. M. (2012). TDCS guided using fMRI significantly accelerates learning to identify concealed objects. Neuroimage, 59, 117–128.Google Scholar

Coffman, B. A., Clark, V. P. & Parasuraman, R. (2014). Battery powered thought: enhancement of attention, learning, and memory in healthy adults using transcranial direct current stimulation. Neuroimage, 85(Pt 3), 895–908.Google Scholar

Cole, M. W., Yarkoni, T., Repovs, G., Anticevic, A. & Braver, T. S. (2012). Global connectivity of prefrontal cortex predicts cognitive control and intelligence. Journal of Neuroscience, 32, 8988–8999.Google Scholar

Colom, R., Abad, F. J., Quiroga, M. A., Shih, P. C. & Flores-Mendoza, C. (2008). Working memory and intelligence are highly related constructs, but why? Intelligence, 36, 584–606.Google Scholar

Colom, R. & Flores-Mendoza, C. E. (2007). Intelligence predicts scholastic achievement irrespective of SES factors: evidence from Brazil. Intelligence, 35, 243–251.Google Scholar

Colom, R., Jung, R. E. & Haier, R. J. (2006a). Distributed brain sites for the g-factor of intelligence. Neuroimage, 31, 1359–1365.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Colom, R., Jung, R. E. (2006b). Finding the g-factor in brain structure using the method of correlated vectors. Intelligence, 34, 561.CrossRef Google Scholar

Colom, R., Jung, R. E. (2007). General intelligence and memory span: evidence for a common neuroanatomic framework. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 24, 867–878.Google Scholar

Colom, R., Karama, S., Jung, R. E. & Haier, R. J. (2010). Human intelligence and brain networks. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 12, 489–501.Google Scholar

Colom, R., Rebollo, I., Palacios, A., Juan-Espinosa, M. & Kyllonen, P. C. (2004). Working memory is (almost) perfectly predicted by g. Intelligence, 32, 277–296.Google Scholar

Colom, R., Roman, F. J., Abad, F. J., Shih, P. C., Privado, J., Froufe, M., et al. (2013). Adaptive n-back training does not improve fluid intelligence at the construct level: gains on individual tests suggest that training may enhance visuospatial processing. Intelligence, 41, 712–727.Google Scholar

Conway, A. R. A., Kane, M. J. & Engle, R. W. (2003). Working memory capacity and its relation to general intelligence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 547–552.Google Scholar

Covington, H. E., 3rd, Lobo, M. K., Maze, I., Vialou, V., Hyman, J. M., Zaman, S., Laplant, Q., Mouzon, E., Ghose, S., Tamminga, C. A., Neve, R. L., Deisseroth, K. & Nestler, E. J. (2010). Antidepressant effect of optogenetic stimulation of the medial prefrontal cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 30, 16082–16090.Google Scholar

Crick, F. (1994). The Astonishing Hypothesis: The Scientific Search for the Soul, New York: Scribner, Maxwell Macmillan International.Google Scholar

Curlik, D. M., 2nd, Maeng, L. Y., Agarwal, P. R. & Shors, T. J. (2013). Physical skill training increases the number of surviving new cells in the adult hippocampus. PLoS ONE, 8, e55850.Google Scholar

Curlik, D. M., Curlik, D. M., 2nd & Shors, T. J. (2013). Training your brain: do mental and physical (MAP) training enhance cognition through the process of neurogenesis in the hippocampus? Neuropharmacology, 64, 506–514.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Davies, G., Armstrong, N., Bis, J. C., Bressler, J., Chouraki, V., Giddaluru, S., et al. (2015). Genetic contributions to variation in general cognitive function: a meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies in the CHARGE consortium (N=53949). Molecular Psychiatry, 20, 183–192.Google Scholar

Davies, G., Tenesa, A., Payton, A., Yang, J., Harris, S. E., Liewald, D., et al. (2011). Genome-wide association studies establish that human intelligence is highly heritable and polygenic. Molecular Psychiatry, 16, 996–1005.Google Scholar

Davis, J. M., Searles, V. B., Anderson, N., Keeney, J., Raznahan, A., Horwood, L. J., Fergusson, D. M., Kennedy, M. A., Giedd, J. & Sikela, J. M. (2015). DUF1220 copy number is linearly associated with increased cognitive function as measured by total IQ and mathematical aptitude scores. Human Genetics, 134, 67–75.Google Scholar

Deary, I. J. (2000). Looking Down on Human Intelligence: From Psychometrics to the Brain, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Deary, I. J., Penke, L. & Johnson, W. (2010). The neuroscience of human intelligence differences. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11, 201–211.Google Scholar

Deary, I. J., Whiteman, M. C., Starr, J. M., Whalley, L. J. & Fox, H. C. (2004). The impact of childhood intelligence on later life: following up the Scottish Mental Surveys of 1932 and 1947. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 130–147.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Del Río, D., Cuesta, P., Bajo, R., García-Pacios, J., López-Higes, R., Del-Pozo, F. & Maestú, F. (2012). Efficiency at rest: magnetoencephalographic resting-state connectivity and individual differences in verbal working memory. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 86, 160–167.Google Scholar

Der, G., Batty, G. D. & Deary, I. J. (2006). Effect of breast feeding on intelligence in children: prospective study, sibling pairs analysis, and meta-analysis. British Medical Journal, 333, 945.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Desrivieres, S., Lourdusamy, A., Tao, C., Toro, R., Jia, T., Loth, E., et al. (2015). Single nucleotide polymorphism in the neuroplastin locus associates with cortical thickness and intellectual ability in adolescents. Molecular Psychiatry, 20, 263–274.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Detterman, D. K. (2014). Introduction to the intelligence special issue on the development of expertise: is ability necessary? Intelligence, 45, 1–5.Google Scholar

Dietrich, A. & Kanso, R. (2010). A review of EEG, ERP, and neuroimaging studies of creativity and insight. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 822–848.Google Scholar

Donnay, G. F., Rankin, S. K., Lopez-Gonzalez, M., Jiradejvong, P. & Limb, C. J. (2014). Neural substrates of interactive musical improvisation: an FMRI study of ‘trading fours’ in jazz. PLoS ONE, 9, e88665.Google Scholar

Drury, S. S., Theall, K., Gleason, M. M., Smyke, A. T., De Vivo, I., Wong, J. Y., Fox, N. A., Zeanah, C. H. & Nelson, C. A. (2012). Telomere length and early severe social deprivation: linking early adversity and cellular aging. Molecular Psychiatry, 17, 719–727.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Duncan, G. J. & Sojourner, A. J. (2013). Can intensive early childhood intervention programs eliminate income-based cognitive and achievement gaps? Journal of Human Resources, 48, 945–968.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Duncan, J. (2010). The multiple-demand (MD) system of the primate brain: mental programs for intelligent behaviour. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14, 172–179.Google Scholar

Duncan, J., Burgess, P. & Emslie, H. (1995). Fluid intelligence after frontal lobe lesions. Neuropsychologia, 33, 261–268.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Duncan, J., Seitz, R. J., Kolodny, J., Bor, D., Herzog, H., Ahmed, A., Newell, F. N. & Emslie, H. (2000). A neural basis for general intelligence. Science, 289, 457–460.Google Scholar

Ericsson, K. A. (2014). Why expert performance is special and cannot be extrapolated from studies of performance in the general population: a response to criticisms. Intelligence, 45, 81–103.Google Scholar

Esposito, G., Kirkby, B. S., Van Horn, J. D., Ellmore, T. M. & Berman, K. F. (1999). Context-dependent, neural system-specific neurophysiological concomitants of ageing: mapping PET correlates during cognitive activation. Brain, 122, 963–979.Google Scholar

Ezkurdia, I., Juan, D., Rodriguez, J. M., Frankish, A., Diekhans, M., Harrow, J., Vazquez, J., Valencia, A. & Tress, M. L. (2014). Multiple evidence strands suggest that there may be as few as 19,000 human protein-coding genes. Human Molecular Genetics, 23, 5866–5878.CrossRef Google Scholar

Falk, D., Lepore, F. E. & Noe, A. (2013). The cerebral cortex of Albert Einstein: a description and preliminary analysis of unpublished photographs. Brain, 136, 1304–1327.Google Scholar

Fangmeier, T., Knauff, M., Ruff, C. C. & Sloutsky, V. M. (2006). fMRI evidence for a three-stage model of deductive reasoning. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 320–334.Google Scholar

Farah, M. J., Betancourt, L., Shera, D. M., Savage, J. H., Giannetta, J. M., Brodsky, N. L., Malmud, E. K. & Hurt, H. (2008). Environmental stimulation, parental nurturance and cognitive development in humans. Developmental Science, 11, 793–801.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Farah, M. J., Smith, M. E., Ilieva, I. & Hamilton, R. H. (2014). Cognitive enhancement. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews – Cognitive Science, 5, 95–103.Google Scholar

Ferrer, E., O’Hare, E. D. & Bunge, S. A. (2009). Fluid reasoning and the developing brain. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 3, 46–51.Google Scholar

Fink, A., Grabner, R. H., Gebauer, D., Reishofer, G., Koschutnig, K. & Ebner, F. (2010). Enhancing creativity by means of cognitive stimulation: evidence from an fMRI study. Neuroimage, 52, 1687–1695.Google Scholar

Finn, E. S., Shen, X., Scheinost, D., Rosenberg, M. D., Huang, J., Chun, M. M., Papademetris, X. & Constable, R. T. (2015). Functional connectome fingerprinting: identifying individuals using patterns of brain connectivity. Nature Neuroscience, 18, 1664–1671.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Firkowska, A., Ostrowska, A., Sokolowska, M., Stein, Z., Susser, M. & Wald, I. (1978). Cognitive development and social policy. Science, 200, 1357–1362.Google Scholar

Flashman, L. A., Andreasen, N. C., Flaum, M. & Swayze, V. W. (1997). Intelligence and regional brain volumes in normal controls. Intelligence, 25, 149–160.Google Scholar

Flynn, J. R. (2013). The “Flynn Effect” and Flynn’s paradox. Intelligence, 41, 851–857.Google Scholar

Frangou, S., Chitins, X. & Williams, S. C. R. (2004). Mapping IQ and gray matter density in healthy young people. Neuroimage, 23, 800–805.Google Scholar

Fregnac, Y. & Laurent, G. (2014). Neuroscience: where is the brain in the Human Brain Project? Nature, 513, 27–29.Google Scholar

Frey, M. C. & Detterman, D. K. (2004). Scholastic assessment or g? The relationship between the scholastic assessment test and general cognitive ability. Psychological Science, 15, 373–378; erratum 15, 641.Google Scholar

Galaburda, A. M. (1999). Albert Einstein’s brain. Lancet, 354, 1821; author reply 1822.Google Scholar

Galton, F. (1869). Hereditary Genius: An Inquiry into its Laws and Consequences, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Galton, F. (2006). Hereditary Genius: An Inquiry into its Laws and Consequences, Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar

Galton, F. & Prinzmetal, M. (1884). Hereditary Genius: An Inquiry into its Laws and Consequences, New York, NY: D. Appleton and Company.Google Scholar

Gardner, H. (1987). The theory of multiple intelligences. Annals of Dyslexia, 37, 19–35.Google Scholar

Gardner, H. & Moran, S. (2006). The science of multiple intelligences theory: a response to Lynn Waterhouse. Educational Psychologist, 41, 227–232.CrossRef Google Scholar

Geake, J. (2008). Neuromythologies in education. Educational Research, 50, 123–133.CrossRef Google Scholar

Geake, J. (2011). Position statement on motivations, methodologies, and practical implications of educational neuroscience research: fMRI studies of the neural correlates of creative intelligence. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 43, 43–47.Google Scholar

Geake, J. G. & Hansen, P. C. (2005). Neural correlates of intelligence as revealed by fMRI of fluid analogies. Neuroimage, 26, 555–564.Google Scholar

Ghatan, P. H., Hsieh, J. C., Wirsén-Meurling, A., Wredling, R., Eriksson, L., Stone-Elander, S., Levander, S. & Ingvar, M. (1995). Brain activation-induced by the perceptual maze test: a PET study of cognitive performance. Neuroimage, 2, 112–124.Google Scholar

Gignac, G. E. (2015). Raven’s is not a pure measure of general intelligence: implications for g factor theory and the brief measurement of g. Intelligence, 52, 71–79.Google Scholar

Glascher, J., Rudrauf, D., Colom, R., Paul, L. K., Tranel, D., Damasio, H. & Adolphs, R. (2010). Distributed neural system for general intelligence revealed by lesion mapping. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107, 4705–4709.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Glascher, J., Tranel, D., Paul, L. K., Rudrauf, D., Rorden, C., Hornaday, A., Grabowski, T., Damasio, H. & Adolphs, R. (2009). Lesion mapping of cognitive abilities linked to intelligence. Neuron, 61, 681–691.Google Scholar

Goel, V. & Dolan, R. J. (2004). Differential involvement of left prefrontal cortex in inductive and deductive reasoning. Cognition, 93, B109–B121.Google Scholar

Goel, V., Gold, B., Kapur, S. & Houle, S. (1997). The seats of reason? An imaging study of deductive and inductive reasoning. Neuroreport, 8, 1305–1310.Google Scholar

Goel, V., Gold, B., Kapur, S. (1998). Neuroanatomical correlates of human reasoning. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 293–302.Google Scholar

Gonen-Yaacovi, G., De Souza, L. C., Levy, R., Urbanski, M., Josse, G. & Volle, E. (2013). Rostral and caudal prefrontal contribution to creativity: a meta-analysis of functional imaging data. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 465.Google Scholar

Gong, Q.-Y., Sluming, V., Mayes, A., Keller, S., Barrick, T., Cezayirli, E. & Roberts, N. (2005). Voxel-based morphometry and stereology provide convergent evidence of the importance of medial prefrontal cortex for fluid intelligence in healthy adults. Neuroimage, 25, 1175.Google Scholar

Gonzalez-Lima, F. & Barrett, D. W. (2014). Augmentation of cognitive brain functions with transcranial lasers. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 8, 36.Google Scholar

Gottfredson, L. S. (1997a). Mainstream science on intelligence: an editorial with 52 signatories, history, and bibliography (reprinted from The Wall Street Journal, 1994). Intelligence, 24, 13–23.Google Scholar

Gottfredson, L. S. (1997b). Why g matters: the complexity of everyday life. Intelligence, 24, 79–132.Google Scholar

Gottfredson, L. S. (2002). Where and why g matters: not a mystery. Human Performance, 15, 25–46.Google Scholar

Gottfredson, L. S. (2003a). Dissecting practical intelligence theory: its claims and evidence. Intelligence, 31, 343–397.Google Scholar

Gottfredson, L. S. (2003b). g, jobs and life. In Nyborg, H. (Ed.), The Scientific Study of General Intelligence. New York, NY: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar

Gottfredson, L. S. (2005). Suppressing intelligence research: hurting those we intend to help. In Wright, R. C. & Cummings, N. A. (Eds.), Destructive Trends in Mental Health: The Well-intentioned Path to Harm. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

Gozli, D. G., Bavelier, D. & Pratt, J. (2014). The effect of action video game playing on sensorimotor learning: evidence from a movement tracking task. Human Movement Science, 38C, 152–162.Google Scholar

Grabner, R. H. (2014). The role of intelligence for performance in the prototypical expertise domain of chess. Intelligence, 45, 26–33.Google Scholar

Grabner, R. H., Stern, E. & Neubauer, A. C. (2007). Individual differences in chess expertise: a psychometric investigation. Acta Psychologica, 124, 398–420.Google Scholar

Graham, S., Jiang, J., Manning, V., Nejad, A. B., Zhisheng, K., Salleh, S. R., Golay, X., Berne, Y. I. & McKenna, P. J. (2010). IQ-related fMRI differences during cognitive set shifting. Cerebral Cortex, 20, 641–649.Google Scholar

Gray, J. R., Chabris, C. F. & Braver, T. S. (2003). Neural mechanisms of general fluid intelligence. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 316–322.Google Scholar

Greely, H., Sahakian, B., Harris, J., Kessler, R. C., Gazzaniga, M., Campbell, P. & Farah, M. J. (2008). Towards responsible use of cognitive-enhancing drugs by the healthy. Nature, 456, 702–705.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Green, A. E., Kraemer, D. J., Fugelsang, J. A., Gray, J. R. & Dunbar, K. N. (2012). Neural correlates of creativity in analogical reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory and Cognition, 38, 264–272.Google Scholar

Gur, R. C., Ragland, J. D., Resnick, S. M., Skolnick, B. E., Jaggi, J., Muenz, L. & Gur, R. E. (1994). Lateralized increases in cerebral blood flow during performance of verbal and spatial tasks: relationship with performance-level. Brain and Cognition, 24, 244–258.Google Scholar

Haasz, J., Westlye, E. T., Fjaer, S., Espeseth, T., Lundervold, A. & Lundervold, A. J. (2013). General fluid-type intelligence is related to indices of white matter structure in middle-aged and old adults. Neuroimage, 83, 372–383.Google Scholar

Hackman, D. A., Farah, M. J. & Meaney, M. J. (2010). Socioeconomic status and the brain: mechanistic insights from human and animal research. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11, 651–659.Google Scholar

Haggarty, P., Hoad, G., Harris, S. E., Starr, J. M., Fox, H. C., Deary, I. J. & Whalley, L. J. (2010). Human intelligence and polymorphisms in the DNA methyltransferase genes involved in epigenetic marking. PLoS ONE, 5, e11329.Google Scholar

Haier, R. J. (1990). The end of intelligence research. Intelligence, 14, 371–374.Google Scholar

Haier, R. J. (2009a). Neuro-intelligence, neuro-metrics and the next phase of brain imaging studies. Intelligence, 37, 121–123.Google Scholar

Haier, R. J. (2009b). What does a smart brain look like? Scientific American Mind, Nov/Dec, 26–33.Google Scholar

Haier, R. J. (2013). The Intelligent Brain. The Great Courses Company.Google Scholar

Haier, R. J. (2014). Increased intelligence is a myth (so far). Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 8, 34.Google Scholar

Haier, R. J. & Benbow, C. P. (1995). Sex differences and lateralization in temporal lobe glucose metabolism during mathematical reasoning. Developmental Neuropsychology, 11, 405–414.Google Scholar

Haier, R. J., Chueh, D., Touchette, P., Lott, I., et al. (1995) Brain size and cerebral glucose metabolic rate in nonspecific mental retardation and Down syndrome. Intelligence, 20, 191–210.Google Scholar

Haier, R. J., Colom, R., Schroeder, D. H., Condon, C. A., Tang, C., Eaves, E. & Head, K. (2009). Gray matter and intelligence factors: is there a neuro-g? Intelligence, 37, 136–144.CrossRef Google Scholar

Haier, R. J., Jung, R. E., Yeo, R. A., Head, K. & Alkire, M. T. (2004). Structural brain variation and general intelligence. Neuroimage, 23, 425–433.Google Scholar

Haier, R. J., Jung, R. E., Yeo, R. A., Head, K. & Alkire, M. T. (2005). The neuroanatomy of general intelligence: sex matters. Neuroimage, 25, 320–327.Google Scholar

Haier, R. J. & Jung, R. E. (2007). Beautiful minds (i.e., brains) and the neural basis of intelligence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 30, 174–178.Google Scholar

Haier, R. J. & Jung, R. E. (2008). Brain imaging studies of intelligence and creativity – what is the picture for education? Roeper Review, 30, 171–180.Google Scholar

Haier, R. J., Robinson, D. L., Braden, W. & Williams, D. (1983). Electrical potentials of the cerebral cortex and psychometric intelligence. Personality & Individual Differences, 4, 591–599.Google Scholar

Haier, R. J., Siegel, B., Tang, C., Abel, L. & Buchsbaum, M. S. (1992a). Intelligence and changes in regional cerebral glucose metabolic-rate following learning. Intelligence, 16, 415–426.Google Scholar

Haier, R. J., Siegel, B. V., Jr., Crinella, F. M. & Buchsbaum, M. S. (1993). Biological and psychometric intelligence: testing an animal model in humans with positron emission tomography. In Douglas, Detterman, (Ed.), Individual Differences and Cognition. New York, NY: Ablex Publishing Corp.Google Scholar

Haier, R.J., Siegel, B.V., Jr., MacLachlan, A., Soderling, E., Lottenberg, S. & Buchsbaum, M. S. (1992b). Regional glucose metabolic changes after learning a complex visuospatial/motor task: a positron emission tomographic study. Brain Research, 570, 134–143.Google Scholar

Haier, R. J., Siegel, B. V., Jr., Nuechterlein, K. H., Hazlett, E., Wu, J. C., Paek, J., Browning, H. L. & Buchsbaum, M. S. (1988). Cortical glucose metabolic rate correlates of abstract reasoning and attention studied with positron emission tomography. Intelligence, 12, 199–217.Google Scholar

Haier, R. J., White, N. S. & Alkire, M. T. (2003). Individual differences in general intelligence correlate with brain function during nonreasoning tasks. Intelligence, 31, 429–441.Google Scholar

Halpern, D. F., Benbow, C. P., Geary, D. C., Gur, R. C., Hyde, J. S. & Gernsbacher, M. A. (2007). The science of sex differences in science and mathematics. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 8, 1–51.Google Scholar

Halstead, W. C. (1947). Brain and Intelligence; A Quantitative Study of the Frontal Lobes, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Hampshire, A., Thompson, R., Duncan, J. & Owen, A. M. (2011). Lateral prefrontal cortex subregions make dissociable contributions during fluid reasoning. Cerebral Cortex, 21, 1–10.Google Scholar

Hanscombe, K. B., Trzaskowski, M., Haworth, C. M. A., Davis, O. S. P., Dale, P. S. & Plomin, R. (2012). Socioeconomic status (SES) and children’s intelligence (IQ): in a UK-representative sample SES moderates the environmental, not genetic, effect on IQ. PloS ONE, 7, e30320.Google Scholar

Harrison, T. L., Shipstead, Z., Hicks, K. L., Hambrick, D. Z., Redick, T. S. & Engle, R. W. (2013). Working memory training may increase working memory capacity but not fluid intelligence. Psychological Science, 24, 2409–2419.Google Scholar

Hartshorne, J. K. & Germine, L. T. (2015). When does cognitive functioning peak? The asynchronous rise and fall of different cognitive abilities across the life span. Psychological Science, 26, 433–443.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Hawkins, J. & Blakeslee, S. (2004). On Intelligence, New York, NY: Times Books.Google Scholar

Haworth, C. M. A., Wright, M. J., Luciano, M., Martin, N. G., De Geus, E. J. C., Van Beijsterveldt, C. E. M., et al. (2010). The heritability of general cognitive ability increases linearly from childhood to young adulthood. Molecular Psychiatry, 15, 1112–1120.Google Scholar

Hayes, T. R., Petrov, A. A. & Sederberg, P. B. (2015). Do we really become smarter when our fluid-intelligence test scores improve? Intelligence, 48, 1–14.Google Scholar

Heishman, S. J., Kleykamp, B. A. & Singleton, E. G. (2010). Meta-analysis of the acute effects of nicotine and smoking on human performance. Psychopharmacology (Berlin), 210, 453–469.Google Scholar

Herrnstein, R. J. (1973) I.Q. in the Meritocracy, Boston, MA: Little.Google Scholar

Herrnstein, R. J. & Murray, C. A. (1994). The Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life, New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar

Heyward, F. D. & Sweatt, J. D. (2015). DNA methylation in memory formation: emerging insights. Neuroscientist, 24, 475–489.Google Scholar

Hill, W. D., Davies, G., Van De Lagemaat, L. N., Christoforou, A., Marioni, R. E., Fernandes, C. P., et al. (2014). Human cognitive ability is influenced by genetic variation in components of postsynaptic signalling complexes assembled by NMDA receptors and MAGUK proteins. Translational Psychiatry, 4, e341.Google Scholar

Hines, T. (1998). Further on Einstein’s brain. Experimental Neurology, 150, 343–344.Google Scholar

Hopkins, W. D., Russe, J. L. & Schaeffer, J. (2014). Chimpanzee intelligence is heritable. Current Biology, 24, 1649–1652.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Horvath, J. C., Forte, J. D. & Carter, O. (2015a). Evidence that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) generates little-to-no reliable neurophysiologic effect beyond MEP amplitude modulation in healthy human subjects: a systematic review. Neuropsychologia, 66, 213–236.Google Scholar

Horvath, J. C., Forte, J. D. (2015b). Quantitative review finds no evidence of cognitive effects in healthy populations from single-session transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Brain Stimulation, 8, 535–550.Google Scholar

Howard-Jones, P. A. (2014). Neuroscience and education: myths and messages. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 15, 817–824.Google Scholar

Hulshoff Pol, H. E., Schnack, H. G., Posthuma, D., Mandl, R. C. W., Baare, W. F., Van Oel, C., et al. (2006). Genetic contributions to human brain morphology and intelligence. Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 10235–10242.Google Scholar

Hunt, E. B. (2011). Human Intelligence, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Husain, M. & Mehta, M. A. (2011). Cognitive enhancement by drugs in health and disease. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 28–36.Google Scholar

Huttenlocher, P. R. (1975). Synaptic and dendritic development and mental defect. In N. A. Buchwald & M. A. B. Brazier (Eds.), Brain Mechanisms in Mental Retardation: UCLA Forum in Medical Science, Number 18, 4th Edition, New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Ilieva, I. P. & Farah, M. J. (2013). Enhancement stimulants: perceived motivational and cognitive advantages. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 7, 198.Google Scholar

Jacobs, B., Schall, M. & Scheibel, A. B. (1993). A quantitative dendritic analysis of Wernicke’s area in humans. II. Gender, hemispheric, and environmental factors. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 327, 97–111.Google Scholar

Jaeggi, S. M., Buschkuehl, M., Jonides, J. & Perrig, W. J. (2008). Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105, 6829–6833.Google Scholar

Jaeggi, S. M., Buschkuehl, M., Jonides, J. Jaeggi, S. M., Buschkuehl, M., Jonides, J. & Shah, P. (2011). Short- and long-term benefits of cognitive training. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108, 10081–10086.Google Scholar

Jaeggi, S. M., Buschkuehl, M., Shah, P. & Jonides, J. (2014). The role of individual differences in cognitive training and transfer. Memory and Cognition, 42, 464–480.Google Scholar

Jaeggi, S. M., Studer-Luethi, B., Buschkuehl, M., Su, Y. F., Jonides, J. & Perrig, W. J. (2010). The relationship between n-back performance and matrix reasoning – implications for training and transfer. Intelligence, 38, 625–635.Google Scholar

Jaenisch, R. & Bird, A. (2003). Epigenetic regulation of gene expression: how the genome integrates intrinsic and environmental signals. Nature Genetics, 33(Suppl), 245–254.Google Scholar

Jauk, E., Neubauer, A. C., Dunst, B., Fink, A. & Benedek, M. (2015). Gray matter correlates of creative potential: a latent variable voxel-based morphometry study. Neuroimage, 111, 312–320.Google Scholar

Jensen, A. (1980). Bias in Mental Testing, New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar

Jensen, A. R. (1969). How much can we boost IQ and scholastic achievement. Harvard Educational Review, 39, 1–123.Google Scholar

Jensen, A. R. (1974). Kinship correlations reported by Sir Cyril Burt. Behavior Genetics, 4, 1–28.Google Scholar

Jensen, A. R. (1981). Straight Talk About Mental Tests, New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar

Jensen, A. R. (1998). The g Factor: The Science of Mental Ability, Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar

Jensen, A. R. (2006). Clocking the Mind: Mental Chronometry and Individual Differences, New York, NY: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Jensen, A. R. & Miele, F. (2002). Intelligence, Race, and Genetics: Conversations with Arthur R. Jensen, Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar

Johnson, M. R., Shkura, K., Langley, S. R., Delahaye-Duriez, A., Srivastava, P., Hill, W. D., et al. (2016). Systems genetics identifies a convergent gene network for cognition and neurodevelopmental disease. Nature Neuroscience, 19, 223–232.Google Scholar

Johnson, W. & Bouchard, T. J. (2005). The structure of human intelligence: it is verbal, perceptual, and image rotation (VPR), not fluid and crystallized. Intelligence, 33, 393–416.Google Scholar

Johnson, W., Bouchard, T. J., Krueger, R. F., McGue, M. & Gottesman, I. I. (2004). Just one g: consistent results from three test batteries. Intelligence, 32, 95–107.Google Scholar

Johnson, W., Jung, R. E., Colom, R. & Haier, R. J. (2008a). Cognitive abilities independent of IQ correlate with regional brain structure. Intelligence, 36, 18–28.Google Scholar

Johnson, W., Te Nijenhuis, J. & Bouchard, T. J. (2008b). Still just 1 g: consistent results from five test batteries. Intelligence, 36, 81–95.Google Scholar

Jung, R. E. (2014). Evolution, creativity, intelligence, and madness: “Here Be Dragons”. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 784.Google Scholar

Jung, R. E., Brooks, W. M., Yeo, R. A., Chiulli, S. J., Weers, D. C. & Sibbitt, W. L. (1999a). Biochemical markers of intelligence: a proton MR spectroscopy study of normal human brain. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B – Biological Sciences, 266, 1375–1379.Google Scholar

Jung, R. E. & Haier, R. J. (2007). The Parieto-Frontal Integration Theory (P-FIT) of intelligence: converging neuroimaging evidence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 30, 135–154.Google Scholar

Jung, R. E. & Haier, R. J. (2013). Creativity and intelligence: brain networks that link and differentiate the expression of genius. In Vartanian, O., Bristol, A. S. & Kaufman, J. C., (Eds.), Neuroscience of Creativity, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Jung, R. E., Haier, R. J., Yeo, R. A., Rowland, L. M., Petropoulos, H., Levine, A. S., Sibbitt, W. L. & Brooks, W. M. (2005). Sex differences in N-acetylaspartate correlates of general intelligence: an 1H-MRS study of normal human brain. Neuroimage, 26, 965–972.Google Scholar

Jung, R. E., Yeo, R. A., Chiulli, S. J., Sibbitt, W. L., Weers, D. C., Hart, B. L. & Brooks, W. M. (1999b). Biochemical markers of cognition: a proton MR spectroscopy study of normal human brain. NeuroReport, 10, 3327–3331.Google Scholar

Kanai, R. & Rees, G. (2011). The structural basis of inter-individual differences in human behaviour and cognition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 12, 231–242.Google Scholar

Kane, M. J. & Engle, R. W. (2002). The role of prefrontal cortex in working-memory capacity, executive attention, and general fluid intelligence: an individual-differences perspective. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 637–671.Google Scholar

Kane, M. J., Hambrick, D. Z. & Conway, A. R. A. (2005). Working memory capacity and fluid intelligence are strongly related constructs: comment on Ackerman, Beier, and Boyle (2005). Psychological Bulletin, 131, 66–71.Google Scholar

Karama, S., Ad-Dab’bagh, Y., Haier, R. J., Deary, I. J., Lyttelton, O. C., Lepage, C. & Evans, A. C. (2009). Positive association between cognitive ability and cortical thickness in a representative US sample of healthy 6 to 18 year-olds. Intelligence, 37, 145–155.Google Scholar

Karama, S., Colom, R., Johnson, W., Deary, I. J., Haier, R., Waber, D. P., Lepage, C., Ganjavi, H., Jung, R., Evans, A. C. & Grp, B. D. C. (2011). Cortical thickness correlates of specific cognitive performance accounted for by the general factor of intelligence in healthy children aged 6 to 18. Neuroimage, 55, 1443–1453.Google Scholar

Kendler, K. S., Turkheimer, E., Ohlsson, H., Sundquist, J. & Sundquist, K. (2015). Family environment and the malleability of cognitive ability: a Swedish national home-reared and adopted-away cosibling control study. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112, 4612–4617.Google Scholar

Keyes, D. (1966). Flowers for Algernon, New York, NY: Harcourt.Google Scholar

Kievit, R. A., Romeijn, J. W., Waldorp, L. J., Wicherts, J. M., Scholte, H. S. & Borsboom, D. (2011). Mind the gap: a psychometric approach to the reduction problem. Psychological Inquiry, 22, 67–87.Google Scholar

Kievit, R. A., Van Rooijen, H., Wicherts, J. M., Waldorp, L. J., Kan, K. J., Scholte, H. S. & Borsboom, D. (2012). Intelligence and the brain: a model-based approach. Cognitive Neuroscience, 3, 89–97.Google Scholar

Kim, D.-J., Davis, E. P., Sandman, C. A., Sporns, O., O’Donnell, B. F., Buss, C. & Hetrick, W. P. (2016). Children’s intellectual ability is associated with structural network integrity. Neuroimage, 124(Part A), 550–556.Google Scholar

Koenis, M. M., Brouwer, R. M., Van Den Heuvel, M. P., Mandl, R. C., Van Soelen, I. L., Kahn, R. S., Boomsma, D. I. & Hulshoff Pol, H. E. (2015). Development of the brain’s structural network efficiency in early adolescence: a longitudinal DTI twin study. Human Brain Mapping, 36, 4938–4953.Google Scholar

Kohannim, O., Hibar, D. P., Stein, J. L., Jahanshad, N., Hua, X., Rajagopalan, P., Toga, A. W., Jack, C. R., Jr., Weiner, M. W., De Zubicaray, G. I., McMahon, K. L., Hansell, N. K., Martin, N. G., Wright, M. J., Thompson, P. M. & Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. (2012a). Discovery and replication of gene influences on brain structure using LASSO regression. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 6, 115.Google Scholar

Kohannim, O., Jahanshad, N., Braskie, M. N., Stein, J. L., Chiang, M.-C., Reese, A. H., et al. (2012b). Predicting white matter integrity from multiple common genetic variants. Neuropsychopharmacology, 37, 2012–2019.Google Scholar

Kolata, S., Light, K., Wass, C. D., Colas-Zelin, D., Roy, D. & Matzel, L. D. (2010). A dopaminergic gene cluster in the prefrontal cortex predicts performance indicative of general intelligence in genetically heterogeneous mice. PLoS ONE, 5, e14036.Google Scholar

Kovas, Y. & Plomin, R. (2006). Generalist genes: implications for the cognitive sciences. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 198–203.Google Scholar

Krause, B. & Cohen Kadosh, R. (2014). Not all brains are created equal: the relevance of individual differences in responsiveness to transcranial electrical stimulation. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 8, 25.Google Scholar

Kuhl, P. K. (2000). A new view of language acquisition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 97, 11850–11857.Google Scholar

Kuhl, P. K. (2004). Early language acquisition: cracking the speech code. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5, 831–843.Google Scholar

Kyllonen, P. C. & Christal, R. E. (1990). Reasoning ability is (little more than) working-memory capacity. Intelligence, 14, 389–433.Google Scholar

Langer, N., Pedroni, A., Gianotti, L. R., Hanggi, J., Knoch, D. & Jancke, L. (2012). Functional brain network efficiency predicts intelligence. Human Brain Mapping, 33, 1393–1406.Google Scholar

Lashley, K. S. (1964). Brain Mechanisms and Intelligence, New York, NY: Hafner.Google Scholar

Lee, J. J. (2010). Review of intelligence and how to get it: why schools and cultures count. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 247–255.Google Scholar

Lee, K. H., Choi, Y. Y., Gray, J. R., Cho, S. H., Chae, J. H., Lee, S. & Kim, K. (2006). Neural correlates of superior intelligence: stronger recruitment of posterior parietal cortex. Neuroimage, 29, 578–586.Google Scholar

Lemos, G. C., Almeida, L. S. & Colom, R. (2011). Intelligence of adolescents is related to their parents’ educational level but not to family income. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 1062–1067.Google Scholar

Lerner, B. (1980). The war on testing – Detroit Edison in perspective. Personnel Psychology, 33, 11–16.Google Scholar

Li, Y., Liu, Y., Li, J., Qin, W., Li, K., Yu, C. & Jiang, T. (2009). Brain anatomical network and intelligence. PLoS Computational Biology, 5, e1000395.Google Scholar

Limb, C. J. & Braun, A. R. (2008). Neural substrates of spontaneous musical performance: an FMRI study of jazz improvisation. PLoS ONE, 3, e1679.Google Scholar

Lipp, I., Benedek, M., Fink, A., Koschutnig, K., Reishofer, G., Bergner, S., Ischebeck, A., Ebner, F. & Neubauer, A. (2012). Investigating neural efficiency in the visuo-spatial domain: an FMRI study. PLoS ONE, 7, e51316.Google Scholar

Liu, S., Chow, H. M., Xu, Y., Erkkinen, M. G., Swett, K. E., Eagle, M. W., Rizik-Baer, D. A. & Braun, A. R. (2012). Neural correlates of lyrical improvisation: an FMRI study of freestyle rap. Science Reports, 2, 834.Google Scholar

Loehlin, J. C. (1989). Partitioning environmental and genetic contributions to behavioral development. American Psychologist, 44, 1285–1292.Google Scholar

Loehlin, J. C. & Nichols, R. C. (1976). Heredity, Environment, & Personality: A Study of 850 Sets of Twins, Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar

Luber, B. & Lisanby, S. H. (2014). Enhancement of human cognitive performance using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Neuroimage, 85(Pt 3), 961–970.Google Scholar

Lubinski, D. (2009). Cognitive epidemiology: with emphasis on untangling cognitive ability and socioeconomic status. Intelligence, 37, 625–633.Google Scholar

Lubinski, D., Benbow, C. P. & Kell, H. J. (2014). Life paths and accomplishments of mathematically precocious males and females four decades later. Psychological Science, 25, 2217–2232.Google Scholar

Lubinski, D., Benbow, C. P., Webb, R. M. & Bleske-Rechek, A. (2006). Tracking exceptional human capital over two decades. Psychological Science, 17, 194–199.Google Scholar

Lubinski, D., Schmidt, D. B. & Benbow, C. P. (1996). A 20-year stability analysis of the study of values for intellectually gifted individuals from adolescence to adulthood. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 443–451.Google Scholar

Luciano, M., Wright, M. J., Smith, G. A., Geffen, G. M., Geffen, L. B. & Martin, N. G. (2001). Genetic covariance among measures of information processing speed, working memory, and IQ. Behavior and Genetics, 31, 581–592.Google Scholar

Luders, E., Harr, K. L., Thompson, P. M., Rex, D. E., Woods, R. P., Deluca, H., Jancke, L. & Toga, A. W. (2006). Gender effects on cortical thickness and the influence of scaling. Human Brain Mapping, 27, 314–324.Google Scholar

Luders, E., Narr, K. L., Bilder, R. M., Thompson, P. M., Szeszko, P. R., Hamilton, L. & Toga, A. W. (2007). Positive correlations between corpus callosum thickness and intelligence. Neuroimage, 37, 1457–1464.Google Scholar

Luders, E., Narr, K. L., Thompson, P. M., Rex, D. E., Jancke, L., Steinmetz, H. & Toga, A. W. (2004). Gender differences in cortical complexity. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 799–800.Google Scholar

Luo, Q., Perry, C., Peng, D. L., Jin, Z., Xu, D., Ding, G. S. & Xu, S. Y. (2003). The neural substrate of analogical reasoning: an fMRI study. Cognitive Brain Research, 17, 527–534.Google Scholar

Mackey, A. P., Finn, A. S., Leonard, J. A., Jacoby-Senghor, D. S., West, M. R., Gabrieli, C. F. & Gabrieli, J. D. (2015). Neuroanatomical correlates of the income-achievement gap. Psychological Science, 26, 925–933.Google Scholar

Mackey, A. P., Hill, S. S., Stone, S. I. & Bunge, S. A. (2011). Differential effects of reasoning and speed training in children. Developmental Science, 14, 582–590.Google Scholar

Mackintosh, N. J. (1995). Cyril Burt: Fraud or Framed? Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Mackintosh, N. J. (2011) IQ and Human Intelligence, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Maguire, E. A., Valentine, E. R., Wilding, J. M. & Kapur, N. (2003). Routes to remembering: the brains behind superior memory. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 90–95.Google Scholar

Maher, B. (2008). Poll results: look who’s doping. Nature, 452, 674–675.Google Scholar

Maldjian, J. A., Davenport, E. M. & Whitlow, C. T. (2014). Graph theoretical analysis of resting-state MEG data: identifying interhemispheric connectivity and the default mode. Neuroimage, 96, 88–94.Google Scholar

Mardis, E. R. (2008). Next-generation DNA sequencing methods. Annual Review of Genomics and Humam Genetics, 9, 387–402.Google Scholar

Marioni, R. E., Davies, G., Hayward, C., Liewald, D., Kerr, S. M., Campbell, A., et al. (2014). Molecular genetic contributions to socioeconomic status and intelligence. Intelligence, 44, 26–32.Google Scholar

Maslen, H., Faulmuller, N. & Savulescu, J. (2014). Pharmacological cognitive enhancement – how neuroscientific research could advance ethical debate. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 8, 107.Google Scholar

Matzel, L. D., Han, Y. R., Grossman, H., Karnik, M. S., Patel, D., Scott, N., Specht, S. M. & Gandhi, C. C. (2003). Individual differences in the expression of a “general” learning ability in mice. Journal of Neuroscience, 23, 6423–6433.Google Scholar

Matzel, L. D. & Kolata, S. (2010). Selective attention, working memory, and animal intelligence. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 34, 23–30.Google Scholar

Matzel, L. D., Sauce, B. & Wass, C. (2013). The architecture of intelligence: converging evidence from studies of humans and animals. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22, 342–348.Google Scholar

Mayseless, N. & Shamay-Tsoory, S. G. (2015). Enhancing verbal creativity: modulating creativity by altering the balance between right and left inferior frontal gyrus with tDCS. Neuroscience, 291, 167–176.Google Scholar

McDaniel, M. A. (2005). Big-brained people are smarter: a meta-analysis of the relationship between in vivo brain volume and intelligence. Intelligence, 33, 337–346.Google Scholar

McGue, M., Bouchard, T. J., Iacono, W. G. & Lykken, D. T. (1993). Age effects on heritability of intelligence. In Plomin, R. & McClearn, G. E. (Eds.), Nature, Nurture, and Psychology, Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

McKinley, R. A., Bridges, N., Walters, C. M. & Nelson, J. (2012). Modulating the brain at work using noninvasive transcranial stimulation. Neuroimage, 59, 129–137.Google Scholar

Melby-Lervag, M. & Hulme, C. (2013). Is working memory training effective? A meta-analytic review. Developmental Psychology, 49, 270–291.Google Scholar

Miller, B. L., Boone, K., Cummings, J. L., Read, S. L. & Mishkin, F. (2000). Functional correlates of musical and visual ability in frontotemporal dementia. British Journal of Psychiatry, 176, 458–463.Google Scholar

Miller, B. L., Cummings, J., Mishkin, F., Boone, K., Prince, F., Ponton, M. & Cotman, C. (1998). Emergence of artistic talent in frontotemporal dementia. Neurology, 51, 978–982.Google Scholar

Moody, D. E. (2009). Can intelligence be increased by training on a task of working memory? Intelligence, 37, 327–328.Google Scholar

Muetzel, R. L., Mous, S. E., Van Der Ende, J., Blanken, L. M., Van Der Lugt, A., Jaddoe, V. W., Verhulst, F. C., Tiemeier, H. & White, T. (2015). White matter integrity and cognitive performance in school-age children: a population-based neuroimaging study. Neuroimage, 119, 119–128.Google Scholar

Murray, C. (1995). The bell curve and its critics. Commentary, 99, 23–30.Google Scholar

Murray, C., Pattie, A., Starr, J. M. & Deary, I. J. (2012) Does cognitive ability predict mortality in the ninth decade? The Lothian Birth Cohort 1921. Intelligence, 40, 490–498.Google Scholar

Muzur, A., Pace-Schott, E. F. & Hobson, J. A. (2002). The prefrontal cortex in sleep. Trends in Cognitive Science, 6, 475–481.Google Scholar

Neisser, U., Boodoo, G., Bouchard, T. J., Boykin, A. W., Brody, N., Ceci, S. J., Halpern, D. F., Loehlin, J. C., Perloff, R., Sternberg, R. J. & Urbina, S. (1996). Intelligence: knowns and unknowns. American Psychologist, 51, 77–101.Google Scholar

Neubauer, A. C. & Fink, A. (2009). Intelligence and neural efficiency. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 33, 1004–1023.Google Scholar

Neville, H., Stevens, C., Pakulak, E. & Bell, T. A. (2013). Commentary: neurocognitive consequences of socioeconomic disparities. Developmental Science, 16, 708–712.Google Scholar

Newman, S. D. & Just, M. A. (2005). The neural bases of intelligence: a perspective based on functional neuroimaging. In Cognition and Intelligence: Identifying the Mechanisms of the Mind. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Nihongaki, Y., Kawano, F., Nakajima, T. & Sato, M. (2015). Photoactivatable CRISPR-Cas9 for optogenetic genome editing. Nature Biotechnology, 33, 755–760.Google Scholar

Nisbett, R. E. (2009). Intelligence and How To Get It: Why Schools and Cultures Count, New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar

Nisbett, R. E., Aronson, J., Blair, C., Dickens, W., Flynn, J., Halpern, D. F. & Turkheimer, E. (2012). Intelligence: new findings and theoretical developments. American Psychologist, 67, 130–159.Google Scholar

Noble, K. G., Houston, S. M., Brito, N. H., Bartsch, H., Kan, E., Kuperman, J. M., et al. (2015). Family income, parental education and brain structure in children and adolescents. Nature Neuroscience, 18, 773–778.Google Scholar

Pahor, A. & Jausovec, N. (2014). The effects of theta transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) on fluid intelligence. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 93, 322–331.Google Scholar

Panizzon, M. S., Vuoksimaa, E., Spoon, K. M., Jacobson, K. C., Lyons, M. J., Franz, C. E., Xian, H., Vasilopoulos, T. & Kremen, W. S. (2014). Genetic and environmental influences of general cognitive ability: is g a valid latent construct? Intelligence, 43, 65–76.Google Scholar

Parasuraman, R. & Jiang, Y. (2012). Individual differences in cognition, affect, and performance: behavioral, neuroimaging, and molecular genetic approaches. Neuroimage, 59, 70–82.Google Scholar

Parks, R. W., Loewenstein, D. A., Dodrill, K. L., Barker, W. W., Yoshii, F., Chang, J. Y., Emran, A., Apicella, A., Sheramata, W. A. & Duara, R. (1988). Cerebral metabolic effects of a verbal fluency test – a PET scan study. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 10, 565–575.Google Scholar

Pascoli, V., Turiault, M. & Luscher, C. (2012). Reversal of cocaine-evoked synaptic potentiation resets drug-induced adaptive behaviour. Nature, 481, 71–75.Google Scholar

Pedersen, N. L., Plomin, R., Nesselroade, J. R. & McClearn, G. E. (1992). A quantitative genetic analysis of cognitive abilities during the 2nd half of the life span. Psychological Science, 3, 346–353.Google Scholar

Penke, L., Maniega, S. M., Bastin, M. E., Hernandez, M. C. V., Murray, C., Royle, N. A., Starr, J. M., Wardlaw, J. M. & Deary, I. J. (2012). Brain white matter tract integrity as a neural foundation for general intelligence. Molecular Psychiatry, 17, 1026–1030.Google Scholar

Perfetti, B., Saggino, A., Ferretti, A., Caulo, M., Romani, G. L. & Onofrj, M. (2009). Differential patterns of cortical activation as a function of fluid reasoning complexity. Human Brain Mapping, 30, 497–510.Google Scholar

Perobelli, S., Alessandrini, F., Zoccatelli, G., Nicolis, E., Beltramello, A., Assael, B. M. & Cipolli, M. (2015). Diffuse alterations in grey and white matter associated with cognitive impairment in Shwachman–Diamond syndrome: evidence from a multimodal approach. Neuroimage Clinics, 7, 721–731.Google Scholar

Pesenti, M., Zago, L., Crivello, F., Mellet, E., Samson, D., Duroux, B., Seron, X., Mazoyer, B. & Tzourio-Mazoyer, N. (2001). Mental calculation in a prodigy is sustained by right prefrontal and medial temporal areas. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 103–107.Google Scholar

Petrill, S. A. & Deater-Deckard, K. (2004). The heritability of general cognitive ability: a within-family adoption design. Intelligence, 32, 403–409.Google Scholar

Pfleiderer, B., Ohrmann, P., Suslow, T., Wolgast, M., Gerlach, A. L., Heindel, W. & Michael, N. (2004). N-acetylaspartate levels of left frontal cortex are associated with verbal intelligence in women but not in men: a proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy study. Neuroscience, 123, 1053–1058.Google Scholar

Pietschnig, J., Voracek, M. & Formann, A. K. (2010). Mozart effect–Shmozart effect: a meta-analysis. Intelligence, 38, 314–323.Google Scholar

Pineda-Pardo, J. A., Bruna, R., Woolrich, M., Marcos, A., Nobre, A. C., Maestu, F. & Vidaurre, D. (2014). Guiding functional connectivity estimation by structural connectivity in MEG: an application to discrimination of conditions of mild cognitive impairment. Neuroimage, 101, 765–777.Google Scholar

Pinho, A. L., De Manzano, O., Fransson, P., Eriksson, H. & Ullen, F. (2014). Connecting to create: expertise in musical improvisation is associated with increased functional connectivity between premotor and prefrontal areas. Journal of Neuroscience, 34, 6156–6163.Google Scholar

Pinker, S. (2002). The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature, New York, NY: Viking.Google Scholar

Plis, S. M., Weisend, M. P., Damaraju, E., Eichele, T., Mayer, A., Clark, V. P., Lane, T. & Calhoun, V. D. (2011). Effective connectivity analysis of fMRI and MEG data collected under identical paradigms. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 41, 1156–1165.Google Scholar

Plomin, R. (1999). Genetics and general cognitive ability. Nature, 402, C25–C29.Google Scholar

Plomin, R. & Deary, I. J. (2015). Genetics and intelligence differences: five special findings. Molecular Psychiatry, 20, 98–108.Google Scholar

Plomin, R. & Kosslyn, S. M. (2001). Genes, brain and cognition. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 1153–1154.Google Scholar

Plomin, R. & Petrill, S. A. (1997). Genetics and intelligence: what’s new? Intelligence, 24, 53–77.Google Scholar

Plomin, R., Shakeshaft, N. G., McMillan, A. & Trzaskowski, M. (2014a). Nature, nurture, and expertise. Intelligence, 45, 46–59.Google Scholar

Plomin, R., Shakeshaft, N. G., McMillan, A. & Trzaskowski, M. (2014b). Nature, nurture, and expertise: response to Ericsson. Intelligence, 45, 115–117.Google Scholar

Pol, H. E. H., Posthuma, D., Baare, W. F. C., De Geus, E. J. C., Schnack, H. G., Van Haren, N. E. M., Van Oel, C. J., Kahn, R. S. & Boomsma, D. I. (2002). Twin–singleton differences in brain structure using structural equation modelling. Brain, 125, 384–390.Google Scholar

Polderman, T. J., Benyamin, B., De Leeuw, C. A., Sullivan, P. F., Van Bochoven, A., Visscher, P. M. & Posthuma, D. (2015). Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies. Nature Genetics, 47, 702–709.Google Scholar

Poldrack, R. A. (2015). Is “efficiency” a useful concept in cognitive neuroscience? Developmental and Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 12–17.Google Scholar

Posthuma, D., Baare, W. F. C., Pol, H. E. H., Kahn, R. S., Boomsma, D. I. & De Geus, E. J. C. (2003a). Genetic correlations between brain volumes and the WAIS-III dimensions of verbal comprehension, working memory, perceptual organization, and processing speed. Twin Research, 6, 131–139.Google Scholar

Posthuma, D., De Geus, E. & Boomsma, D. (2003b). Genetic contributions to anatomical, behavioral, and neurophysiological indices of cognition. In Plomin, R., Defries, J., Craig, I. W. & McGuffin, P. (Eds.), Behavioral Genetics in the Postgenomic Era, Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Posthuma, D., De Geus, E. J., Baare, W. F., Hulshoff Pol, H. E., Kahn, R. S. & Boomsma, D. I. (2002). The association between brain volume and intelligence is of genetic origin. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 83–84.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Posthuma, D. & De Geus, E. J. C. (2006). Progress in the molecular-genetic study of intelligence. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 151–155.Google Scholar

Prabhakaran, V., Smith, J. A., Desmond, J. E., Glover, G. H. & Gabrieli, J. D. (1997). Neural substrates of fluid reasoning: an fMRI study of neocortical activation during performance of the Raven’s Progressive Matrices Test. Cognitive Psychology, 33, 43–63.Google Scholar

Prat, C. S., Mason, R. A. & Just, M. A. (2012). An fMRI investigation of analogical mapping in metaphor comprehension: the influence of context and individual cognitive capacities on processing demands. Journal of Experimental Psychology, Learning, Memory and Cognition, 38, 282–294.Google Scholar

Preusse, F., Van Der Meer, E., Deshpande, G., Krueger, F. & Wartenburger, I. (2011). Frontiers: fluid intelligence allows flexible recruitment of the parieto-frontal network in analogical reasoning. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5, 22.Google Scholar

Protzko, J., Aronson, J. & Blair, C. (2013). How to make a young child smarter: evidence from the database of raising intelligence. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 25–40.Google Scholar

Ramey, C. T. & Ramey, S. L. (2004). Early learning and school readiness: can early intervention make a difference? Merrill-Palmer Quarterly Journal of Developmental Psychology, 50, 471–491.Google Scholar

Rankin, K. P., Liu, A. A., Howard, S., Slama, H., Hou, C. E., Shuster, K. & Miller, B. L. (2007). A case-controlled study of altered visual art production in Alzheimer’s and FTLD. Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology, 20, 48–61.Google Scholar

Rauscher, F. H., Shaw, G. L. & Ky, K. N. (1993). Music and spatial task performance. Nature, 365, 611.Google Scholar

Redick, T. S. (2015). Working memory training and interpreting interactions in intelligence interventions. Intelligence, 50, 14–20.Google Scholar

Redick, T. S., Shipstead, Z., Harrison, T. L., Hicks, K. L., Fried, D. E., Hambrick, D. Z., Kane, M. J. & Engle, R. W. (2013). No evidence of intelligence improvement after working memory training: a randomized, placebo-controlled study. Journal of Experimental Psychology – General, 142, 359–379.Google Scholar

Ree, M. J. & Carretta, T. R. (1996). Central role of g in military pilot selection. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 6, 111–123.Google Scholar

Ree, M. J. & Earles, J. A. (1991). Predicting training success – not much more than g. Personnel Psychology, 44, 321–332.Google Scholar

Reijneveld, J. C., Ponten, S. C., Berendse, H. W. & Stam, C. J. (2007). The application of graph theoretical analysis to complex networks in the brain. Clinical Neurophysiology, 118, 2317–2331.Google Scholar

Reverberi, C., Bonatti, L. L., Frackowiak, R. S., Paulesu, E., Cherubini, P. & Macaluso, E. (2012). Large scale brain activations predict reasoning profiles. Neuroimage, 59, 1752–1764.Google Scholar

Rhein, C., Muhle, C., Richter-Schmidinger, T., Alexopoulos, P., Doerfler, A. & Kornhuber, J. (2014). Neuroanatomical correlates of intelligence in healthy young adults: the role of basal ganglia volume. PLoS ONE, 9, e93623.Google Scholar

Ridley, M. (2003). Nature Via Nurture: Genes, Experience and What Makes Us Human, London: Fourth Estate.Google Scholar

Rietveld, C. A., Esko, T., Davies, G., Pers, T. H., Turley, P., Benyamin, B., et al. (2014). Common genetic variants associated with cognitive performance identified using the proxy-phenotype method. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111, 13790–13794.Google Scholar

Ritchie, S. J., Booth, T., Valdés Hernández, M. D. C., Corley, J., Maniega, S. M., Gow, A. J., et al. (2015). Beyond a bigger brain: multivariable structural brain imaging and intelligence. Intelligence, 51, 47–56.Google Scholar

Robertson, K. F., Smeets, S., Lubinski, D. & Benbow, C. P. (2010). Beyond the threshold hypothesis: even among the gifted and top math/science graduate students, cognitive abilities, vocational interests, and lifestyle preferences matter for career choice, performance, and persistence. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19, 346–351.Google Scholar

Sackett, P. R., Kuncel, N. R., Arneson, J. J., Cooper, S. R. & Waters, S. D. (2009). Does socioeconomic status explain the relationship between admissions tests and post-secondary academic performance? Psychological Bulletin, 135, 1–22.Google Scholar

Sahakian, B. & Morein-Zamir, S. (2007). Professor’s little helper. Nature, 450, 1157–1159.Google Scholar

Sander, J. D. & Joung, J. K. (2014). CRISPR-Cas systems for genome editing, regulation and targeting. Nature Biotechnology, 32, 347–355.Google Scholar

Santarnecchi, E., Galli, G., Polizzotto, N. R., Rossi, A. & Rossi, S. (2014). Efficiency of weak brain connections support general cognitive functioning. Human Brain Mapping, 35, 4566–4582.Google Scholar

Santarnecchi, E., Polizzotto, N. R., Godone, M., Giovannelli, F., Feurra, M., Matzen, L., Rossi, A. & Rossi, S. (2013). Frequency-dependent enhancement of fluid intelligence induced by transcranial oscillatory potentials. Current Biology, 23, 1449–1453.Google Scholar

Santarnecchi, E., Rossi, S. & Rossi, A. (2015a). The smarter, the stronger: intelligence level correlates with brain resilience to systematic insults. Cortex, 64, 293–309.Google Scholar

Santarnecchi, E., Tatti, E., Rossi, S., Serino, V. & Rossi, A. (2015b). Intelligence-related differences in the asymmetry of spontaneous cerebral activity. Human Brain Mapping, 36, 3586–3602.Google Scholar

Sauce, B. & Matzel, L. D. (2013). The causes of variation in learning and behavior: why individual differences matter. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 395.Google Scholar

Sawyer, K. (2011). The cognitive neuroscience of creativity: a critical review. Creativity Research Journal, 23, 137–154.Google Scholar

Schmidt, F. L. & Hunter, J. (2004). General mental ability in the world of work: occupational attainment and job performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 162–173.Google Scholar

Schmidt, F. L. & Hunter, J. E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 262–274.Google Scholar

Schmithorst, V. J. & Holland, S. K. (2006). Functional MRI evidence for disparate developmental processes underlying intelligence in boys and girls. Neuroimage, 31, 1366–1379.Google Scholar

Schmithorst, V. J., Wilke, M., Dardzinski, B. J. & Holland, S. K. (2005). Cognitive functions correlate with white matter architecture in a normal pediatric population: a diffusion tensor MRI study. Human Brain Mapping, 26, 139–147.Google Scholar

Schwaighofer, M., Fischer, F. & Buhner, M. (2015). Does working memory training transfer? A meta-analysis including training conditions as moderators. Educational Psychologist, 50, 138–166.Google Scholar

Sellers, K. K., Mellin, J. M., Lustenberger, C. M., Boyle, M. R., Lee, W. H., Peterchev, A. V. & Frohlich, F. (2015). Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of frontal cortex decreases performance on the WAIS-IV intelligence test. Behavior and Brain Research, 290, 32–44.Google Scholar

Shakeshaft, N. G., Trzaskowski, M., McMillan, A., Krapohl, E., Simpson, M. A., Reichenberg, A., Cederlof, M., Larsson, H., Lichtenstein, P. & Plomin, R. (2015). Thinking positively: the genetics of high intelligence. Intelligence, 48, 123–132.Google Scholar

Shamay-Tsoory, S. G., Adler, N., Aharon-Peretz, J., Perry, D. & Mayseless, N. (2011). The origins of originality: the neural bases of creative thinking and originality. Neuropsychologia, 49, 178–185.Google Scholar

Shaw, P., Greenstein, D., Lerch, J., Clasen, L., Lenroot, R., Gogtay, N., Evans, A., Rapoport, J. & Giedd, J. (2006). Intellectual ability and cortical development in children and adolescents. Nature, 440, 676–679.Google Scholar

Shehzad, Z., Kelly, C., Reiss, P. T., Cameron Craddock, R., Emerson, J. W., McMahon, K., Copland, D. A., Castellanos, F. X. & Milham, M. P. (2014). A multivariate distance-based analytic framework for connectome-wide association studies. Neuroimage, 93(Pt 1), 74–94.Google Scholar

Shipstead, Z., Redick, T. S. & Engle, R. W. (2012). Is working memory training effective? Psychological Bulletin, 138, 628–654.Google Scholar

Shonkoff, J. P., Phillips, D. & National Research Council (U.S.). Committee On Integrating The Science Of Early Childhood Development. (2000). From Neurons to Neighborhoods: The Science of Early Childhood Development, Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar

Sigala, N. (2015). Effects of memory training or task design? A commentary on “Neural evidence for the use of digit-image mnemonic in a superior memorist: an fMRI study”. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 183.Google Scholar

Sigman, M., Pena, M., Goldin, A. P. & Ribeiro, S. (2014). Neuroscience and education: prime time to build the bridge. Nature Neuroscience, 17, 497–502.Google Scholar

Silverman, P. H. (2004). Rethinking genetic determinism. The Scientist, 18, 32–33.Google Scholar

Simos, P. G., Rezaie, R., Papanicolaou, A. C. & Fletcher, J. M. (2014). Does IQ affect the functional brain network involved in pseudoword reading in students with reading disability? A magnetoencephalography study. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 932.Google Scholar

Smith, M. E. & Farah, M. J. (2011). Are prescription stimulants “smart pills”? The epidemiology and cognitive neuroscience of prescription stimulant use by normal healthy individuals. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 717–741.Google Scholar

Smith, S. M., Nichols, T. E., Vidaurre, D., Winkler, A. M., Behrens, T. E. J., Glasser, M. F., Ugurbil, K., Barch, D. M., Van Essen, D. C. & Miller, K. L. (2015). A positive–negative mode of population covariation links brain connectivity, demographics and behavior. Nature Neuroscience, 18, 1565–1567.Google Scholar

Snyderman, M. & Rothman, S. (1988). The IQ Controversy, The Media and Public Policy, New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.Google Scholar

Song, M., Liu, Y., Zhou, Y., Wang, K., Yu, C. & Jiang, T. (2009). Default network and intelligence difference. Conference Proceedings of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2009, 2212–2215.Google Scholar

Song, M., Zhou, Y., Li, J., Liu, Y., Tian, L., Yu, C. & Jiang, T. (2008). Brain spontaneous functional connectivity and intelligence. Neuroimage, 41, 1168–1176.Google Scholar

Spearman, C. (1904). General intelligence objectively determined and measured. American Journal of Psychology, 15, 201–293.Google Scholar

Stam, C. J. & Reijneveld, J. C. (2007). Graph theoretical analysis of complex networks in the brain. Nonlinear Biomedical Physics, 1, 3.Google Scholar

Stanley, J., Keating, D. & Fox, L. H. (1974). Mathematical Talent: Discovery, Description, and Development, Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Stein, J. L., Medland, S. E., Vasquez, A. A., Hibar, D. P., Senstad, R. E., Winkler, A. M., et al. (2012). Identification of common variants associated with human hippocampal and intracranial volumes. Nature Genetics, 44, 552–561.Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J. (2000). Practical Intelligence in Everyday Life, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J. (2003). Our research program validating the triarchic theory of successful intelligence: reply to Gottfredson. Intelligence, 31, 399–413.Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J. (2008). Increasing fluid intelligence is possible after all. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105, 6791–6792.Google Scholar

Strenze, T. (2007) Intelligence and socioeconomic success: a meta-analytic review of longitudinal research. Intelligence, 35, 401–426.Google Scholar

Suthana, N. & Fried, I. (2014). Deep brain stimulation for enhancement of learning and memory. Neuroimage, 85(Pt 3), 996–1002.Google Scholar

Tammet, D. (2007). Born on a Blue Day: Inside the Extraordinary Mind of an Autistic Savant: A Memoir, New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar

Tang, C. Y., Eaves, E. L., Ng, J. C., Carpenter, D. M., Mai, X., Schroeder, D. H., Condon, C. A., Colom, R. & Haier, R. J. (2010). Brain networks for working memory and factors of intelligence assessed in males and females with fMRI and DTI. Intelligence, 38, 293–303.Google Scholar

Tang, Y. P., Shimizu, E., Dube, G. R., Rampon, C., Kerchner, G. A., Zhuo, M., Liu, G. S. & Tsien, J. Z. (1999). Genetic enhancement of learning and memory in mice. Nature, 401, 63–69.Google Scholar

Te Nijenhuis, J., Jongeneel-Grimen, B. & Kirkegaard, E. O. W. (2014). Are Headstart gains on the g factor? A meta-analysis. Intelligence, 46, 209–215.Google Scholar

Te Nijenhuis, J. & Van Der Flier, H. (2013). Is the Flynn effect on g? A meta-analysis. Intelligence, 41, 802–807.Google Scholar

Terman, L. M. (1925). Genetic Studies of Genius, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Terman, L. M. (1954) Scientists and Nonscientists in a Group of 800 Gifted Men, Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Thoma, R. J., Yeo, R. A., Gangestad, S., Halgren, E., Davis, J., Paulson, K. M. & Lewine, J. D. (2006). Developmental instability and the neural dynamics of the speed–intelligence relationship. Neuroimage, 32, 1456–1464.Google Scholar

Thomas, P., Rammsayer, T., Schweizer, K. & Troche, S. (2015). Elucidating the functional relationship between working memory capacity and psychometric intelligence: a fixed-links modeling approach for experimental repeated-measures designs. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 11, 3–13.Google Scholar

Thompson, P. M., Cannon, T. D., Narr, K. L., Van Erp, T., Poutanen, V. P., Huttunen, M., Lonnqvist, J., Standertskjold-Nordenstam, C. G., Kaprio, J., Khaledy, M., Dail, R., Zoumalan, C. I. & Toga, A. W. (2001). Genetic influences on brain structure. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 1253–1258.Google Scholar

Thompson, R., Crinella, F. M. & Yu, J. (1990). Brain Mechanisms in Problem Solving and Intelligence: A Survey of the Rat Brain, New York, NY: Plenum Press.Google Scholar

Thompson, T. W., Waskom, M. L., Garel, K. L., Cardenas-Iniguez, C., Reynolds, G. O., Winter, R., Chang, P., Pollard, K., Lala, N., Alvarez, G. A. & Gabrieli, J. D. (2013). Failure of working memory training to enhance cognition or intelligence. PLoS ONE, 8, e63614.Google Scholar

Thurstone, L. L. (1938). Primary Mental Abilities, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Thurstone, L. L. & Thurstone, T. (1941). Factorial Studies of Intelligence, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Tidwell, J. W., Dougherty, M. R., Chrabaszcz, J. R., Thomas, R. P. & Mendoza, J. L. (2014). What counts as evidence for working memory training? Problems with correlated gains and dichotomization. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 21, 620–628.Google Scholar

Toga, A. W. & Thompson, P. M. (2005). Genetics of brain structure and intelligence. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 28, 1–23.Google Scholar

Tommasi, M., Pezzuti, L., Colom, R., Abad, F. J., Saggino, A. & Orsini, A. (2015). Increased educational level is related with higher IQ scores but lower g-variance: evidence from the standardization of the WAIS-R for Italy. Intelligence, 50, 68–74.Google Scholar

Trahan, L. H., Stuebing, K. K., Fletcher, J. M. & Hiscock, M. (2014). The Flynn effect: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 1332–1360.Google Scholar

Trzaskowski, M., Davis, O. S. P., Defries, J. C., Yang, J., Visscher, P. M. & Plomin, R. (2013a). DNA evidence for strong genome-wide pleiotropy of cognitive and learning abilities. Behavior Genetics, 43, 267–273.Google Scholar

Trzaskowski, M., Harlaar, N., Arden, R., Krapohl, E., Rimfeld, K., McMillan, A., Dale, P. S. & Plomin, R. (2014). Genetic influence on family socioeconomic status and children’s intelligence. Intelligence, 42, 83–88.Google Scholar

Trzaskowski, M., Shakeshaft, N. G. & Plomin, R. (2013b). Intelligence indexes generalist genes for cognitive abilities. Intelligence, 41, 560–565.Google Scholar

Turkheimer, E. (2000). Three laws of behavior genetics and what they mean. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 160–164.Google Scholar

Turkheimer, E., Haley, A., Waldron, M., D’Onofrio, B. & Gottesman, I. I. (2003). Socioeconomic status modifies heritability of IQ in young children. Psychological Sciences, 14, 623–628.Google Scholar

Ukkola-Vuoti, L., Kanduri, C., Oikkonen, J., Buck, G., Blancher, C., Raijas, P., Karma, K., Lahdesmaki, H. & Jarvela, I. (2013). Genome-wide copy number variation analysis in extended families and unrelated individuals characterized for musical aptitude and creativity in music. PLoS ONE, 8, e56356.Google Scholar

Unsworth, N., Redick, T. S., McMillan, B. D., Hambrick, D. Z., Kane, M. J. & Engle, R. W. (2015). Is playing video games related to cognitive abilities? Psychological Sciences, 26, 759–774.Google Scholar

Urban, D. J. & Roth, B. L. (2015). DREADDs (designer receptors exclusively activated by designer drugs): chemogenetic tools with therapeutic utility. Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology, 55, 399–417.Google Scholar

Utz, K. S., Dimova, V., Oppenlander, K. & Kerkhoff, G. (2010). Electrified minds: transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) as methods of non-invasive brain stimulation in neuropsychology – a review of current data and future implications. Neuropsychologia, 48, 2789–2810.Google Scholar

Vakhtin, A. A., Ryman, S. G., Flores, R. A. & Jung, R. E. (2014). Functional brain networks contributing to the Parieto-Frontal Integration Theory of Intelligence. Neuroimage, 103, 349–354.Google Scholar

Van Den Heuvel, M. P., Kahn, R. S., Goni, J. & Sporns, O. (2012). High-cost, high-capacity backbone for global brain communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109, 11372–11377.Google Scholar

Van Den Heuvel, M. P. & Sporns, O. (2011). Rich-club organization of the human connectome. Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 15775–15786.Google Scholar

Van Den Heuvel, M. P., Stam, C. J., Kahn, R. S. & Pol, H. E. (2009). Efficiency of functional brain networks and intellectual performance. Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 7619–7624.Google Scholar

Van Der Sluis, S., Willemsen, G., De Geus, E. J. C., Boomsma, D. I. & Posthuma, D. (2008). Gene–environment interaction in adults’ IQ scores: measures of past and present environment. Behavior Genetics, 38, 348–360.Google Scholar

Van Leeuwen, M., Van Den Berg, S. M. & Boomsma, D. I. (2008). A twin-family study of general IQ. Learning and Individual Differences, 18, 76–88.Google Scholar

Vardy, E., Robinson, J. E., Li, C., Olsen, R. H., Diberto, J. F., Giguere, P. M., et al. (2015). A new DREADD facilitates the multiplexed chemogenetic interrogation of behavior. Neuron, 86, 936–946.Google Scholar

Vendetti, M. S. & Bunge, S. A. (2014). Evolutionary and developmental changes in the lateral frontoparietal network: a little goes a long way for higher-level cognition. Neuron, 84, 906–917.Google Scholar

Vernon, P. A. (1983). Speed of information processing and general intelligence. Intelligence, 7, 53–70.Google Scholar

Villarreal, M. F., Cerquetti, D., Caruso, S., Schwarcz Lopez Aranguren, V., Gerschcovich, E. R., Frega, A. L. & Leiguarda, R. C. (2013). Neural correlates of musical creativity: differences between high and low creative subjects. PLoS ONE, 8, e75427.Google Scholar

Von Bastian, C. C. & Oberauer, K. (2013). Distinct transfer effects of training different facets of working memory capacity. Journal of Memory and Language, 69, 36–58.Google Scholar

Von Bastian, C. C. & Oberauer, K. (2014). Effects and mechanisms of working memory training: a review. Psychological Research – Psychologische Forschung, 78, 803–820.Google Scholar

Von Stumm, S. & Deary, I. J. (2013). Intellect and cognitive performance in the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936. Psychology and Aging, 28, 680–684.Google Scholar

Vuoksimaa, E., Panizzon, M. S., Chen, C. H., Fiecas, M., Eyler, L. T., Fennema-Notestine, C., et al. (2015). The genetic association between neocortical volume and general cognitive ability is driven by global surface area rather than thickness. Cerebral Cortex, 25, 2127–2137.Google Scholar

Wagner, T., Robaa, D., Sippl, W. & Jung, M. (2014). Mind the methyl: methyllysine binding proteins in epigenetic regulation. ChemMedChem, 9, 466–483.Google Scholar

Wai, J., Lubinski, D. & Benbow, C. P. (2005). Creativity and occupational accomplishments among intellectually precocious youths: an age 13 to age 33 longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 484–492.Google Scholar

Walfisch, A., Sermer, C., Cressman, A. & Koren, G. (2013). Breast milk and cognitive development – the role of confounders: a systematic review. BMJ Open, 3, e003259.Google Scholar

Wang, L., Wee, C. Y., Suk, H. I., Tang, X. & Shen, D. (2015). MRI-based intelligence quotient (IQ) estimation with sparse learning. PLoS ONE, 10, e0117295.Google Scholar

Waterhouse, L. (2006). Inadequate evidence for multiple intelligences, Mozart effect, and emotional intelligence theories. Educational Psychologist, 41, 247–255.Google Scholar

Watson, J. B. (1930). Behaviorism, New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar

Weiss, D., Haier, R. & Keating, D. (1974). Personality characteristics of mathematically precocious boys. In Stanley, J. & Keating, D. (Eds.), Mathematical Talent: Discovery, Description, and Development. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Wendelken, C., Ferrer, E., Whitaker, K. J. & Bunge, S. A. (2016). Fronto-parietal network reconfiguration supports the development of reasoning ability. Cerebral Cortex, 26, 2178–2190.Google Scholar

Whalley, L. J. & Deary, I. J. (2001). Longitudinal cohort study of childhood IQ and survival up to age 76. British Medical Journal, 322, 819.Google Scholar

Wharton, C. M., Grafman, J., Flitman, S. S., Hansen, E. K., Brauner, J., Marks, A. & Honda, M. (2000). Toward neuroanatomical models of analogy: a positron emission tomography study of analogical mapping. Cognitive Psychology, 40, 173–197.Google Scholar

Wilke, M., Sohn, J. H., Byars, A. W. & Holland, S. K. (2003). Bright spots: correlations of gray matter volume with IQ in a normal pediatric population. Neuroimage, 20, 202–215.Google Scholar

Willerman, L., Schultz, R., Rutledge, J. N. & Bigler, E. D. (1991). In vivo brain size and intelligence. Intelligence, 15, 223–228.Google Scholar

Wilson, E. O. (1975). Sociobiology; The New Synthesis, Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Witelson, S. F., Beresh, H. & Kigar, D. L. (2006). Intelligence and brain size in 100 postmortem brains: sex, lateralization and age factors. Brain, 129, 386–398.Google Scholar

Witelson, S. F., Kigar, D. L. & Harvey, T. (1999). Albert Einstein’s brain – Reply. Lancet, 354, 1822.Google Scholar

Witelson, S. F., Kigar, D. L. & Harvey, T. (1999). The exceptional brain of Albert Einstein. Lancet, 353, 2149–2153.Google Scholar

Wolff, S. B., Grundemann, J., Tovote, P., Krabbe, S., Jacobson, G. A., Muller, C., Herry, C., Ehrlich, I., Friedrich, R. W., Letzkus, J. J. & Luthi, A. (2014). Amygdala interneuron subtypes control fear learning through disinhibition. Nature, 509, 453–458.Google Scholar

Wu, X., Yang, W., Tong, D., Sun, J., Chen, Q., Wei, D., Zhang, Q., Zhang, M. & Qiu, J. (2015). A meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies on divergent thinking using activation likelihood estimation. Human Brain Mapping, 36, 2703–2718.Google Scholar

Yang, J. J., Yoon, U., Yun, H. J., Im, K., Choi, Y. Y., Lee, K. H., Park, H., Hough, M. G. & Lee, J. M. (2013). Prediction for human intelligence using morphometric characteristics of cortical surface: partial least square analysis. Neuroscience, 246, 351–361.Google Scholar

Yin, L. J., Lou, Y. T., Fan, M. X., Wang, Z. X. & Hu, Y. (2015). Neural evidence for the use of digit-image mnemonic in a superior memorist: an fMRI study. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 109.Google Scholar

Yu, C. C., Furukawa, M., Kobayashi, K., Shikishima, C., Cha, P. C., Sese, J., Sugawara, H., Iwamoto, K., Kato, T., Ando, J. & Toda, T. (2012). Genome-wide DNA methylation and gene expression analyses of monozygotic twins discordant for intelligence levels. Plos One, 7, e47081.Google Scholar

Zhao, M., Kong, L. & Qu, H. (2014). A systems biology approach to identify intelligence quotient score-related genomic regions, and pathways relevant to potential therapeutic treatments. Science Reports, 4, 4176.Google Scholar

Book contents

References

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive