Acharya, Amitav, Foundations of Collective Action in Asia: Theory and Practice of Regional Cooperation, ADBI Working Paper Series, No. 344 (2012)Google Scholar

Aggarwal, Vinod K. & Chow, Jonathan T., The Perils of Consensus: How ASEAN’s Meta-regime Undermines Economic and Environmental Cooperation, 17 (2) Rev. Int’l Pol. Econ. 262 (2010)Google Scholar

Araujo, Billy Melo, Labour Provisions in EU and US Mega-regional Trade Agreements: Rhetoric and Reality, 67 Int’l & Com. L. Q. 233 (2018)Google Scholar

Archarya, Amitav, Ideas, Identity, and Institution-Building: From the “ASEAN Way” to the “Asia-Pacific Way”? 10 (3) Pac. Rev. 319 (1997)Google Scholar

Ba, Alice, Institutional Divergence and Convergence in the Asia-Pacific? ASEAN in Practice and in Theory, 27 (2) Cam. Rev. Int’l Aff. 295 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baldwin, Richard, A Domino Theory of Regionalism, NBER Working Paper Series, No. 4465 (1993)Google Scholar

Baldwin, Richard & Kawai, Masahiro, Multilateralizing Asian Regionalism, ADBI Working Paper Series, No. 431 (2013)Google Scholar

Balganesh, Shyamkrishna, The Pragmatic Incrementalism of Common Law Intellectual Property, 63 (6) Vanderbilt L. Rev. 1543 (2010)Google Scholar

Bhagwati, Jagdish, Regionalism versus Multilateralism, 15 World Econ. 535 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Biden, Joseph R. Jr., Why America Must Lead Again: Rescuing U.S. Foreign Policy After Trump, 99 (2) Foreign Aff. 64 (2020)Google Scholar

Blyde, Juan & Sinyavskaya, Natalia, The Impact of Liberalizing Trade in Services on Trade in Goods: An Empirical Investigation, 11 (3) Rev. Dev. Econ. 566 (2007)Google Scholar

Bradford, Anu, The Brussels Effect, 107 (1) NW. Univ. L. Rev. 1 (2012)Google Scholar

Brummer, Chris, Why Soft Law Dominates International Finance – and Not Trade, 13 (3) J. Int’l Econ. L. 623 (2010)Google Scholar

Cai, Congyan, New Great Powers and International Law in the 21st Century, 24 (3) Eur. J. Int’l L. 755 (2013)Google Scholar

Campbell, Kurt M. & Ratner, Ely, The China Reckoning: How Beijing Defied American Expectation, 97 (2) Foreign Aff. 60 (2018)Google Scholar

Camroux, David, Interregionalism or Merely a Fourth-Level Game? An Examination of the EU-ASEAN Relationship, 27 E. Asia 57 (2010)Google Scholar

Chaisse, Julien & Kirkwood, Jamieson, Chinese Puzzle: Anatomy of the (Invisible) Belt and Road Investment Treaty, 23 (1) J. Int’l Econ. L. 245 (2020)Google Scholar

Chaisse, Julien & Matshshita, Mitsuo, China’s “Belt and Road” Initiative: Mapping the World Trade Normative and Strategic Implications, 52 (1) J. World Trade 163 (2018)Google Scholar

Cho, Sungjoon, Breaking the Barrier between Regionalism and Multilateralism: A New Perspective on Trade Regionalism, 42 (2) Harv. Int’l L. J. 419 (2001)Google Scholar

Cho, Sungjoon & Kurtz, Jurgen, Legalizing the ASEAN Way: Adopting and Reimagining the ASEAN Investment Regime, 66 Am. J. Com. L. 233 (2018)Google Scholar

Claussen, Kathleen, Dispute Settlement under the Next Generation of Free Trade Agreement, 46 (3) Ga. J. Int’l & Com. L. 611 (2018)Google Scholar

Clinton, Hillary, America’s Pacific Century, 189 Foreign Pol’y 56 (2011)Google Scholar

Conconi, Paola & Howse, Robert, Panel Report on EC-IT Products, 11 (2) World Trade Rev. 223 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cremona, Marise, Shaping EU Trade Policy Post-Lisbon: Opinion 2/15 of 16 May 2017, 14 Eur. Cont’l L. Rev. 231 (2018)Google Scholar

Dang, Le Ngoc et al., State-owned Enterprises Reform in Viet Nam: Progress and Challenges, ADBI Working Paper Series, No. 1071 (2020)Google Scholar

Das, Sanchita Basu et al., Can ASEAN+1 FTAs be a Pathway towards Negotiating and Designing the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) Agreement?, 50 (2) J. World Trade 253 (2016)Google Scholar

deLisle, Jacques, China’s Rise, the U.S., and the WTO: Perspectives from International Relations Theory, 2018 Univ. Ill. L. Rev. 57 (2018)Google Scholar

Desierto, Diane A., ASEAN’s Constitutionalization of International Law: Challenges to Evolution under the New ASEAN Charter, 49 Colum. J. Transnat’l L. 268 (2010–11)Google Scholar

Durán, Gracia Marín, Sustainable Development Chapters in EU Free Trade Agreements: Emerging Compliance Issues, 57 Common Market L. Rev. 1 (2020)Google Scholar

Elms, Deborah, Understanding the CPTPP, 6/2017 ASEAN Focus 8 (2017)Google Scholar

Freiber, Arie, Therapeutic Jurisprudence in Australia: Paradigm Shift or Pragmatic Incrementalism? 20 (2) L. in Context 6 (2003)Google Scholar

Fukunaga, Yoshifumi, Assessing the Progress of ASEAM MRAs on Professional Services, ERIA Discussion Paper Series (2015)Google Scholar

Fukunaga, Yoshifumi & Ishido, Hikari, Assessing the Progress of Services Liberalization in the ASEAN-China Free Trade Area (ACFTA), ERIA Discussion Paper Series (2013)Google Scholar

Fukunaga, Yoshifumi & Isono, Ikumo, Taking ASEAN+1 FTAs towards the RCEP: A Mapping Study, ERIA Discussion Paper Series (2013)Google Scholar

Fukunaga, Yuka, Japan’s Trade Policy in the Midst of Uncertainty, Aise.Visions, No. 112 (2020)Google Scholar

Galbraith, Jean, United States Continues to Block New Appellate Body Members for the World Trade Organization, Risking the Collapse of the Appellate Process, 113 (4) Am. J. Int’l L. 822 (2019)Google Scholar

Garzón, Jorge F., Multipolarity and the Future of Economic Regionalism, 9 (1) Int’l Theory 101 (2016)Google Scholar

Gilman, Nils, The New International Economic Order: A Reintroduction, 6 (1) Humanity 1 (2015)Google Scholar

Gilson, Julie, New Interregionalism? The EU and East Asia, 27 (3) Eur. Integration 307 (2005)Google Scholar

Ginsburg, Tom, Eastphalia Asian Regionalism, 44 UC Davis L. Rev. 859 (2010–11)Google Scholar

Ginsburg, Tom, Authoritarian International Law, 114 (2) Am. J. Int’l L. 221 (2020)Google Scholar

Goh, Evelyn, Great Powers and Hierarchical Order in Southeast Asia: Analyzing Regional Securities Strategies, 32 (3) Int’l Security 113 (2007/08)Google Scholar

Guzman, Andrew T. & Meyer, Timothy L., International Soft Law, 2 (1) J. Legal Analysis 171 (2010)Google Scholar

Hamanaka, Shintaro & Jusoh, Sufian, Understanding the ASEAN Way of Regional Qualification Governance: The Case of Mutual Recognition Agreements in the Professional Service Sector, 12 (4) Reg. & Governance 486 (2018)Google Scholar

Hathaway, Oona A., International Delegation and State Sovereignty, 71 (1) L. & Contemp. Problems 115 (2008)Google Scholar

Hettne, Björn, Beyond the “New” Regionalism, 10 (4) New Pol. Eco 543 (2005)Google Scholar

Hillgenberg, Harmut, A Fresh Look at Soft Law, 10 (3) Eur. J. Int’l L. 500 (1999)Google Scholar

Hoang, Ha Hai, Normative Power Europe through Trade: Vietnamese Perceptions, 30 (2) Int’l Rel. 176 (2015)Google Scholar

Hoang, Ha Hai & Sicurelli, Daniela, The EU’s Preferential Trade Agreements with Singapore and Vietnam: Market vs. Normative Imperatives, 23 (4) Contemp. Pol. 369 (2017)Google Scholar

Hofmann, Claudia et al., Horizontal Depth: A New Database on the Content of Preferential Trade Agreements, Policy Research Working Paper, No. 7981 (2017)Google Scholar

Hradilová, Kateřina & Svoboda, Ondřej, Sustainable Development Chapters in the EU Free Trade Agreements: Searching for Effectiveness, 52 (6) J. World Trade 1019 (2018)Google Scholar

Hsieh, Pasha L., The Taiwan Question and the One-China Policy: Legal Challenges with Renewed Momentum, 84 (3) Die Friedens-Warte: J. Int’l Peace & Organ. 59 (2009)Google Scholar

Hsieh, Pasha L., The China-Taiwan ECFA, Geopolitical Dimensions and WTO Law, 14 (1) J. Int’l Econ. L. 121 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hsieh, Pasha L., Reassessing the Trade-Development Nexus in International Economic Law: The Paradigm Shift in Asia-Pacific Regionalism, 37 (2) NW J. Int’l L. & Bus. 321 (2017)Google Scholar

Ikenberry, G. John, The End of International Order? 94 (1) Int’l Aff. 7 (2018)Google Scholar

Ikenberry, G. John, The Next Liberal Order: The Age of Contagion Demands More Internationalism, Not Less, 99 (4) Foreign Aff. 133 (2020)Google Scholar

Ing, Lili Yan et al., How Do Exports and Imports Affect the Use of Free Trade Agreements? Firm-level Survey Evidence from Southeast Asia, ERIA Discussion Paper Series (2016)Google Scholar

Kang, David, South Korean and Taiwanese Development and the New Institutional Economics, 49 (3) Int’l Organ. 555 (1995)Google Scholar

Kawai, Masahiro & anda Naknoi, K, ASEAN Economic Integration through Trade and Foreign Direct Investment: Long-Term Challenges, ADBI Working Paper Series, No. 545 (2015)Google Scholar

Kelsey, Jane, The Risks for ASEAN of New Mega-Agreements that Promote the Wrong Model of e-Commerce, ERIA Discussion Paper Series (2017)Google Scholar

Kikuchi, Tomoo et al., The Effects of Mega-Regional Trade Agreements to Vietnam, 55 J. Asian Eco. 4 (2017)Google Scholar

Kim, Dong-Young, Adapting the MGA for Negotiating with South Korean Counterparts, Asialink Bus. (2015)Google Scholar

Kim, Samuel S., Regionalization and Regionalism in Asia, 4 (1) J. E Asian Stud. 39 (2004)Google Scholar

Kleimann, David & Kübek, Gesa, The Signing, Provisional Application, and Conclusion of Trade and Investment Agreements in the EU: The Case of CETA and Opinion 2/15, 45 (1) Legal Issues Eco. Integration 13 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kojima, Kiyoshi, The “Flying Geese” Model of Asian Economic Development: Origin, Theoretical Extensions, and Regional Policy Implications, 11 J. Asian Econ. 375 (2000)Google Scholar

Kong, Qingjiang, U.S.-China Bilateral Investment Treaty Negotiations: Context, Focus, and Implications, 7 (1) Asian J. WTO & Int’l Health and Policy 181 (2012)Google Scholar

Krauthammer, Charles, The Unipolar Moment, 70 Foreign Aff. 23 (1990–91)Google Scholar

Lamy, Pascal, Unlocking the Potential of the ASEAN-EU Partnership: The Role of Singapore, 2 Asia Eur. J 485 (2004)Google Scholar

Lee, Hsien Loong, The Endangered Asian Century: America, China and the Perils of Confrontation, 99 (4) Foreign Aff. 52 (2020)Google Scholar

Lee, Seungjoo, Institutional Balancing and the Politics of Mega-FTAs in East Asia, 56 Asian Survey 1055 (2016)Google Scholar

Lester, Simon & Manak, Inu, The Rise of Populist Nationalism and Renegotiation of NAFTA, 21 (1) J. Int’l Econ. L. 151 (2018)Google Scholar

Leutert, Wendy & Haver, Zachary, From Cautious Interaction to Mature Influence: China’s Evolving Engagement with the International Investment Regime, 93 (1) Pac. Aff. 59 (2020)Google Scholar

Lewis, Meredith Kolsky, The Origin of Plurilateralism in International Trade Law, 20 J. Inv. & Trade 633 (2019)Google Scholar

Lim, Darren J. & Cooper, Zack, Reassessing Hedging: The Logic of Alignment in East Asia, 24 (4) Sec. Stud. 696 (2015)Google Scholar

Lim, Paul Joseph, ASEAN’s Relations with the EU: Obstacles and Opportunities, EU External Aff. Rev. 46 (2012)Google Scholar

Limenta, Michelle, Palm Oil for Fuels: WTO Rules and Environmental Protection, 15 (7) Global Trade & Customs J. 321 (2020)Google Scholar

Lin, Justin Yifu, From Flying Geese to Leading Dragons New Opportunities and Strategies for Structural Transformation in Developing Countries, Policy Research Working Paper, No. 5702 (2011)Google Scholar

Lin, Tsai-Yu, Systemic Reflection on the EC-IT Product Case: Establishing an “Understanding” on Maintaining the Product Coverage of the Current Information Technology Agreement in the Face of Technological Change, 45 (2) J. World Trade 401 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Liu, Han-Wei & Peng, Shin-Yi, Managing Trade Conflicts in the ICT Industry: A Case Study of EU–Greater China Area, 19 (3) J. Int’l Econ. L. 629 (2016)Google Scholar

Magiera, Stephen L., International Investment Agreements and Investor-State Disputes: A Review and Evaluation for Indonesia, ERIA Discussion Series (2017)Google Scholar

Manea, Maria-Gabriela, Human Rights and the Interregional Dialogue between Asia and Europe: ASEAN-EU Relations and ASEM, 21 (3) Pac. Rev. 369 (2008)Google Scholar

Manners, Ian, Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms?, 40 (2) J. Common Market Stud. 235 (2002)Google Scholar

Manners, Ian & Whitman, Richard, The “Difference Engine”: Constructing and Representing the International Identity of the European Union, 10 (3) J. Eur. Pub. Pol’y 380 (2003)Google Scholar

Mansfield, Edward D. & Solingen, Etel, Regionalism, 13 Ann. Rev. Pol. Sci. 145 (2010)Google Scholar

Mansfield, Edward D. & Milner, Helen V., The New Wave of Regionalism, 53 (3) Int’l Organ. 589 (1999)Google Scholar

Marhold, Anna-Alexandra, Externalising Europe’s Energy Policy in EU Free Trade Agreements: A Cognitive Dissonance between Promoting Sustainable Development and Ensuing Security of Supply, 3 (1) Eur & World: A L. Rev. 1 (2019)Google Scholar

Mattoo, Aaditya et al., Trade Creation and Trade Diversion in Deep Agreements, Policy Research Working Paper, No. 8206 (2017)Google Scholar

McKenzie, Lachlan & Meissner, Katharina L., Human Rights Conditionality in European Union Trade Negotiations: The Case of the EU-Singapore FTA, 55 (4) J. Common Market Stud.832 (2017)Google Scholar

McLaughlin, Mark, Defining a State-Owned Enterprise in International Investment Agreements, 34 (3) ICSID Rev. 595 (2020)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Medalla, Erlinda M. & Supperamaniam, M., Suggested Rules of Origin Regime for EAFTA, Philippine Inst. for Dev. Stud. Discussion Paper Series No. 2008–22 (Rev.) (2009)Google Scholar

Mercurio, Bryan, Trade Liberalisation in Asia: Why Intra-Asian Free Trade Agreements Are Not Utilised By the Business Community, 6 (1) Asian J. WTO & Int’l Health L. & Pol. 109 (2011)Google Scholar

Mitchell, Jonathan, An Unconventional but Essential Marriage: Pro-Poor Tourism and the Mainstream Industry, Private Sector & Dev., No. 7 (2010)Google Scholar

Moranda, Noel M., Europe and Southeast Asia: ASEAN-EU Interregionalism between Pluralist and Solidarist Societies, 4 (3) Rev. Eur. Stud. 89 (2012)Google Scholar

Morris-Sharma, Natalie Y., The Singapore Convention is Live, and Multilateralism, Alive, 20 (4) Cardozo J. Conflict Resol. 1009 (2019)Google Scholar

Nguyen, Trang (Mae), International Law as Hedging: Perspectives from Secondary Authoritarian States, 114 Am. J. Int’l L. Unbound 237 (2020)Google Scholar

Nixon, Richard M., Asia After Viet Nam, 46 (1) Foreign Aff. 111 (1967)Google Scholar

Nottage, Luke, The Investment Chapter and ISDS in the TPP: Lessons from Southeast Asia, ISEAS Yusof Ishak Institute Economics Working Papers, No. 2017–2 (2017)Google Scholar

Ong, Bernard, Recognizing Regions: ASEAN’ Struggles for Recognition, 25 (4) Pac. Rev. 513 (2012)Google Scholar

Orakhelashvili, Alexander, Article 30 of the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: Application of the Successive Treaties Relating to the Same Subject-Matter, 31 ICSID Rev. 344 (2016)Google Scholar

Ota, Yasu & Maruyama, Shuichi, Ocean’s Eleven, 2018–12–18 Nikkei Asian Rev. 10 (2018)Google Scholar

Pakrashi, Debayan & Frijters, Paul, Takeoffs, Landing, and Economic Growth, ADBI Working Paper Series, Nov. 641 (2017)Google Scholar

Park, Sung-Hoon & Lee, Jeong Yoen, APEC at Crossroads: Challenges and Opportunities, 33 (2) Asian Persp. 97 (2009)Google Scholar

Petri, Peter A. & Plummer, Michael G., East Asia Decouples from the United States: Trade War, COVID-19, and East Asia’s New Trade Blocs, PIIE Working Paper (2020)Google Scholar

Pinchis-Paulsen, Mona, Trade Multilateralism and U.S. National Security: The Making of the GATT Security Exceptions, 41 Mich. J. Int’l L. 109 (2020)Google Scholar

Price, Adrian Hyde, “Normative” Power Europe: A Realist Critique, 13 (2) J. Eur. Pub. Pol’y 217 (2006)Google Scholar

Quimba, Francis A. & Barral, Mark Anthony A., The Evolution of APEC and Its Role in the Philippine Trade and Investment, PIDS Discussion Paper Series, No. 2019–07 (2019)Google Scholar

Roberts, Anthea et al., Toward a Geoeconomic Order in International Trade and Investment, 22 J. Int’l Econ. L. 655 (2019)Google Scholar

Robles, Alfred C., Jr, An EU-ASEAN FTA: The EU’s Failure as an International Actor, 13 Eur. Foreign Aff. Rev. 541 (2008)Google Scholar

Ruggie, John Gerard, International Regimes, Transactions, and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order, 36 (2) Int’l Organ. 379 (1982)Google Scholar

Santos, Theotonio Dos, The Structure of Dependence, 60 Am. Econ. Rev. 231 (1970)Google Scholar

Shaffer, Gregory & Gao, Henry, A New Chinese Economic Order? 23 (3) J. Int’l Econ. L. 607 (2020)Google Scholar

Singh, Surendar & Singh, Ram, Domestic Sources of India’s Trade Policy References in RCEP Negotiations, 54 (4) J. World Trade 503 (2020)Google Scholar

Söderbaum, Fredrik & Van Langenhove, Luk, Introduction: The EU as a Global Actor and the Role of Interregionalism, 27 (3) Eur. Integration 249 (2005)Google Scholar

Suse, Andrei & Wouters, Jan, Exploring the Boundaries of Provisional Application: The EU’s Mixed Trade and Investment Agreements, 53 (3) J. World Trade 395 (2019)Google Scholar

Tang, Siew Mun, Is ASEAN Due for a Makeover, 39 (2) Contem. Southeast Asia 239 (2017)Google Scholar

Tang, Siew Mun, ASEAN’s Hard Look at Indo-Pacific, 3/2018 ASEAN Focus 6 (2018)Google Scholar

Tang, Siew Mun et al., Survey Report: State of Southeast Asia: 2019, 1/2019 ASEAN Focus 6 (2019)Google Scholar

Tham, Siew Yean, ASEAN Trade in Services Agreement (ATISA: Advancing Services Liberalization for ASEAN? 54 Persp. 1 (2019)Google Scholar

Tho, Tran Van, The Middle-Income Trap: Issues for Members of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, ADBI Working Paper Series, No. 421 (2013)Google Scholar

Tong, Goh Chok, Asia – Catalyst for Global Economic Integration, 2 Asia Eur. J. 1 (2004)Google Scholar

Urata, Shujiro, Constructing and Multilateralizing the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership: An Asian Perspective, ADBI Working Paper Series, No. 449 (2013)Google Scholar

Vandewalle, Laurence, The ASEAN Inter-Parliamentary Assembly (AIPA): A Privileged Interlocutor for the European Parliament in South East Asia (2015)Google Scholar

Walt, Stephan M., Alliance Formation and the Balance of Power, 9 (4) Int’l Sec. 3 (1985)Google Scholar

Wang, Heng, China’s Approach to the Belt and Road Initiative: Scope, Character and Sustainability, 22 (1) J. Int’l Econ. L. 29 (2019)Google Scholar

Webb, Michael C. & Krasner, Stephen D., Hegemonic Stability Theory: An Empirical Assessment, 15 (2) Rev. Int’l Stud. 183 (1989)Google Scholar

Wendt, Alexander, Collective Identity Formation and the International State, 88 (2) Am. Pol. Sci. Rev. 384 (1994)Google Scholar

Williamson, John, The Strange History of the Washington Consensus, 27 (2) J. Post Keynesian Eco.195 (2004)Google Scholar

Wilson, Jeffery D., Mega-Regional Trade Deals in the Asia-Pacific: Choosing Between the TPP and RCEP?, 45 (2) J. Contemp. Asia 343 (2015)Google Scholar

Wong, Benjamin, Data Localization and ASEAN Economic Community, 10 Asian J. Int’l L.158 (2020)Google Scholar

Woon, Walter, Resolving Territorial Disputes in ASEAN, 30 Chinese (Taiwan) YB Int’l L. & Aff. 1 (2012)Google Scholar

Zhong, Zewei, The ASEAN Comprehensive Investment Agreement: Realizing a Regional Community, 6 (1) Asian J. Comp. L. 1 (2011)Google Scholar

Abrenica, Joy et al., The Future of Trade in Services for Developing Countries, in Trade and Poverty Reduction in the Asia-Pacific Region: Case Studies and Lessons from Low-Income Communities (Andrew L. Stoler et al. eds. 2009)Google Scholar

Acharya, Amitav, The Making of Southeast Asia: International Relations of a Region (2000)Google Scholar

Acharya, Amitav, The Quest for Identity: International Relations of Southeast Asia (2000)Google Scholar

Acharya, Amitav, Whose Ideas Matter? Agency and Power in Asian Regionalism (2009)Google Scholar

Acharya, Amitav, Constructing a Security Community in Southeast Asia: ASEAN and the Problem of Regional Order (3d 2014)Google Scholar

Acharya, Amitav, Regionalism beyond EU-Centrism, in The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Regionalism (Tanja A. Börzel & Thomas Risse 2016)Google Scholar

Aggarwal, Vinod K. & Fogarty, Edward A., Between Regionalism and Globalism: European Union Interregional Trade Strategies, in EU Trade Strategies: Between Regionalism and Globalism (Vinod K. Aggarwal & Edward A. Fogarty eds. 2004)Google Scholar

Aggarwal, Vinod K. & Kwei, Elaine, Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC): Transregionalism with a New Cause?, in Interregionalism and International Relations (Heiner Hänggi et al. eds. 2006)Google Scholar

Allison, Graham, Destined for War: Can America and China Escape Thucydides’s Trap (2017)Google Scholar

Ba, Alice, (Re)Negotiating East and Southeast Asia: Region, Regionalism, and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (2009)Google Scholar

Beth, Vivienne & Nottage, Luke, International Investment Agreement and Investor-State Arbitration in Asia, in Handbook of International Investment Law and Policy (Julien Chaisse et al. eds. 2020)Google Scholar

Bhagwati, Jagdish, Termites in the Trading System: How Preferential Agreements Undermine Free Trade (2008)Google Scholar

Borthwick, Mark, Building Momentum: The Movement Toward Pacific Economic Cooperation Prior to 1980, in The Evolution of PECC: The First 25 Years (2005)Google Scholar

Börzel, Tanja A. & Thomas Risse, Introduction: Framework of the Handbook and Conceptual Clarifications, in The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Regionalism (Tanja A. Börzel & Thomas Risse 2016)Google Scholar

Bradford, Anu, The Brussels Effect: How the European Union Rules the World (2020)Google Scholar

Breslin, Shaun et al., Regions in Comparative Perspective, in New Regionalism in the Global Political Economy: Theories and Cases (Shaun Breslin et al. eds. 2002)Google Scholar

Brown, Chester & Winch, Phoebe, The Confidentiality and Transparency Debate in Commercial and Investment Mediation, in Mediation in International Commercial and Investment Disputes (Catherine Titi & Katia Fach Gómez eds. 2019)Google Scholar

Brummer, Chris, Soft Law and the Global Financial System: Rule Making in the 21st Century (2012)Google Scholar

Bull, Cavinder, Enhancing the Rule of Law in Investor-State Dispute Settlement, in The ASEAN Law Conference 2018: A Compendium of Speeches, Papers, Presentations and Reports (2019)Google Scholar

Cardoso, Fernando Henrique & Faletto, Enzo, Dependency and Development in Latin America (Marjory Mattingly Urquidi trans., 1979)Google Scholar

Chaisse, Julien, The ACIA: Much More Than a BIT of Protection for Foreign Investors, in ASEAN Law in the New Regional Economic Order (2019)Google Scholar

Chaisse, Julien & Jusoh, Sufian, The ASEAN Comprehensive Investment Agreement: The Regionalisation of Laws and Policy on Foreign Investment (2016)Google Scholar

Chan, Man-jung Mignonne, APEC’s Eye on the Prize: Participants, Modality, and Confidence-Building, in APEC at 20: Recall, Reflect, Remake (K. Kesavapany and Hank Lim eds. 2009)Google Scholar

Chen, Christopher, ASEAN Financial Integration and the Belt and Road Initiative: Legal Challenges and Opportunities for China in Southeast Asia, in International Governance and the Rule of Law in China under the Belt and Road Initiative (Yun Zhao ed. 2018)Google Scholar

China in the International Economic Order: New Directions and Changing Paradigms (Lisa Toohey et al. eds. 2015)Google Scholar

Chow, Michael Ewing & Yusran, Ranyta, The ASEAN Trade Dispute Settlement Mechanism, in The Legitimacy of International Trade Courts and Tribunals (Robert Howse et al. eds. 2018)Google Scholar

Closa, Carlo & Casni, Lorenzo, Comparative Regional Integration: Governance and Legal Models (2016)Google Scholar

Coicaud, Jean Marc, Legitimacy and Politics: A Contribution to the Study of Political Right and Political Responsibility (2002)Google Scholar

Cremona, Marise, Distinguished Essay: A Quiet Revolution – The Changing Nature of the EU’s Common Commercial Policy, in 2017:8 Eur. YB Int’l Econ. L. (Marc Bungenberg et al. eds. 2017)Google Scholar

Crozier, Andrew J., The Trade and Aid Policy of the European Union: A Historical Perspective, in EU-ASEAN: Facing Economic Globalisation (Paul J. J. Welfens et al. 2009)Google Scholar

Dent, Christopher M., East Asian Regionalism (2d. ed. 2016)Google Scholar

DeRosa, Dean A., US Free Trade Agreements with ASEAN, in Free Trade Agreements: US Strategies and Priorities (Jeffrey J. Schott ed. 2004)Google Scholar

Dothan, Shai & Lam, Joanna, A Paradigm Shift? Arbitration and Court-Like Mechanism in Investors’ Disputes, in 2020 Eur. YB Int’l Econ. L. (Güneş Ünüvar et al. eds. 2020)Google Scholar

Dowdle, Michael W. et al., Dialogus de Beijing Consensus, in The Beijing Consensus? How Chian Has Changed Western Ideas of Law and Economic Development (Weitseng Chen ed. 2017)Google Scholar

Elek, Andrew, Back to Canberra: Founding APEC, in The Evolution of PECC: The First 25 Years (2005)Google Scholar

Elek, Andrew, Overview, in The Evolution of PECC: The First 25 Years (2005)Google Scholar

Elms, Deborah K. & C. L. Lim, An Overview and Snapshot of the TPP Negotiations, in The Trans-Pacific Partnership: A Quest for a Twenty-first-Century Trade Agreement (C. L. Lim et al. eds. 2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flaaen, Aaron et al., How to Avoid Middle-Income Traps? Evidence from Malaysia, World Bank: Economic Premise, No. 120 (2013)Google Scholar

Frost, Ellen L., Asia’s New Regionalism (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fukunaga, Yoshifumi, Challenges of ASEAN MRAs on Professional Services, in ASEAN Law in the New Regional Economic Order: Global Trends and Shifting Paradigms (Pasha L. Hsieh & Bryan Mercurio eds. 2019)Google Scholar

Gathii, James Thuo, African Regional Trade Agreements as Legal Regimes (2011)Google Scholar

Gilbert, Alan, Must Global Politics Constrain Democracy? Great-Power Realism, Democratic Peace, and Democratic Internationalism (1999)Google Scholar

Gold, Thomas Baron, State and Society in the Taiwan Miracle (1986)Google Scholar

Gu, Weixia, China’s Arbitration Modernisation under Judicial Efforts and Marketisation Waves, in The Developing World of Arbitration: A Comparative Study of Arbitration Reform in the Asia Pacific (Anselmo Reyes & Weixia Gu eds. 2018)Google Scholar

Haggard, Stephan, Developmental States (2018)Google Scholar

Hamanaka, Shintaro, Accession to TPP: Veto Power and “Opt-Out” Option, in Paradigm Shift in International Economic Law Rule-Making: TPP as a New Model for Trade Agreements? (Julien Chaisse et al. eds. 2017)Google Scholar

Hänggi, Heiner, Interregionalism as a Multifaceted Phenomenon: In Search of a Typology, in Interregionalism and International Relations: A Stepping Stone to Global Governance? (Jürgen Ruland et al. 2005)Google Scholar

Hettne, Björn, The New Regionalism: Implications for Development and Peace, in The New Regionalism: Implications for Global Development and International Security, UNU/WIDER World Institute for Development Economics Research (Björn Hettne & András Inotai 1994)Google Scholar

Hoa, Tran Van, Globalisation, Crises and the Emergence of New Asian Regionalism: Genesis and Current Development, in New Asian Regionalism: Responses to Globalisation and Crises (Tran Van Hoa & Charles Harve eds. 2003)Google Scholar

Hsieh, Pasha L., China-Taiwan Free Trade Agreement, in Bilateral and Regional Trade Agreements: Case Studies (Simon Lester et al. eds. 2d ed. 2015)Google Scholar

Hsieh, Pasha L., Transnational Legal Services in Asia: Legal Implications of the AEC and the CPTPP, in ASEAN Law in the New Regional Economic Order: Global Trends and Shifting Paradigms (Pasha L. Hsieh & Bryan Mercurio 2019)Google Scholar

Hsu, Locknie, EU-ASEAN Trade and Investment Relations with a Special Focus on Singapore, in 2015:6 Eur. YB Int’l Econ. L. (Christoph Herrmann et al. eds. 2015)Google Scholar

Hurell, Andrew, Regionalism in Theoretical Perspective, in Regionalism in World Politics: Regional Organization and International Order (Louise Fawcett & Andrew Hurrell eds. 1995)Google Scholar

Inama, Stefano & Sim, Edmund W., Rules of Origin in ASEAN: A Way Forward (2015)Google Scholar

Ing, Lili Yang et al., NTMs in ASEAN: Ways toward Regulatory Convergence, in Regional Integration and Non-Tariff Measures in ASEAN (Lili Yan Ing et al. eds. 2019)Google Scholar

Jetschke, Anja et al., Asia, in The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Regionalism (Tanja A. Börzel & Thomas Risse 2016)Google Scholar

Jusoh, Sufian, Investment Liberalization in ASEAN: Moving Myths to Reality, in ASEAN Law in the New Regional Economic Order: Global Trends and Shifting Paradigms (Pasha L. Hsieh & Bryan Mercurio 2019)Google Scholar

Karton, Joshua, Beyond the “Harmonious Confucian”: International Commercial Arbitration and the Impact of Chinese Cultural Values, in Legal Thoughts between the East and the West in the Multilevel Legal Order: Liber Amicorum in Honor of Professor Herbert Han-pao Ma (Chang-fa Lo et al. eds. 2016)Google Scholar

Katzenstein, Peter J., Introduction: Asian Regionalism in Comparative Perspective, in Network Power: Japan and Asia (Peter J. Katzenstein & Takashi Shiraishi eds. 1997)Google Scholar

Kawai, Masahiro & Wignaraja, Ganeshan, Main Findings and Policy Implications, in Asia’s Free Trade Agreements: How is Business Responding? (2011)Google Scholar

Kiang, Lim Hng to Anand Sharma, Special Scheme for Registration of Generic Medicinal Products from India (2010)Google Scholar

Kingsbury, Benedict et al., Introduction: The Essence, Significance, and Problems of the Trans-Pacific Partnership, in Megaregulation Contested: Global Economic Ordering after TPP (Benedict Kingsbury et al. eds. 2019)Google Scholar

Kirshner, Jonathan, Realist Political Economy: Traditional Themes and Contemporary Challenges, in Routledge Handbook of International Political Economy (IPE): IPE as a Global Conversation 36 (Mark Blyth ed. 2009)Google Scholar

Kissinger, Henry, World Order (2014)Google Scholar

Koh, Tommy, The United States and Southeast Asia, in America’s Role in Asia, Asian and American Views: Recommendations for U.S. Policy from Both Sides of the Pacific (2008)Google Scholar

Kuijper, Peter Jan et al., From Treaty-Making to Treaty-Breaking: Models for ASEAN External Trade Agreements (2015)Google Scholar

Lakatos, Csilla & Nilsson, Lars, The EU-Korea Free Trade Agreement: Anticipation, Trade Policy Uncertainty and Impact, Chief Economist Note (2015)Google Scholar

Lenz, Tobias & Marks, Gary, Regional Institutional Design, in The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Regionalism (Tanja A. Börzel & Thomas Risse 2016)Google Scholar

Leong, Susanna H. S., European Union-Singapore Free Trade Agreement: A New Chapter for Geographical Indications in Singapore, in Geographical Indications at the Crossroads of Trade, Development, and Culture: Focus on Asia-Pacific (Irene Calboli & Wee Loon Ng-Loy eds. 2017)Google Scholar

Lester, Simon et al., Trump’s First Trade Dal, Free Trade Bulletin, No. 73 (2019)Google Scholar

Lim, C. L. et al., What is “High-Quality, Twenty-First Century” Anyway? in The Trans-Pacific Partnership: A Quest for a Twenty-first-Century Trade Agreement (C. L. Lim et al. eds. 2012)Google Scholar

Liu, Han-Wei, Data Localization and Digital Trade Barriers: ASEAN in Megaregionalism, in ASEAN Law in the New Regional Economic Order (2019)Google Scholar

Lincoln, Edward J., East Asian Economic Regionalism (2004)Google Scholar

Mahbubani, Kishore & Sng, Jeffery, The ASEAN Miracle: A Catalyst for Peace (2017)Google Scholar

Mahoney, James et al., Dependency Theory, in The Oxford Handbook of the Politics of Development (Carol Lancaster & Nicolas van de Walle 2018)Google Scholar

Mann, Catherine & Liu, Xuepeng, The Information Technology Agreement: Sui Generis or Model Stepping Stone?, in Multilateralizing Regionalism: Challenges for the Global Trading System (Richard Baldwin & Patrick Low eds. 2009)Google Scholar

Mattoo, Aaditya & Zanini, Gianni, Services Trade Agreements and Negotiations: An Overview, in Handbook of Trade Policy for Development (Arvid Lukauskas et al. eds. 2013)Google Scholar

Megaregulation Contested: Global Economic Ordering after TPP (Benedict Kingsbury et al. 2019)Google Scholar

Nguyen, Minh Hue et al., The ASEAN Trade in Goods Agreement: Evolution and Regional Implications, in ASEAN Law in the New Regional Economic Order: Global Trends and Shifting Paradigms (Pasha L. Hsieh & Bryan Mercurio eds. 2019)Google Scholar

Mohan, Mahdev, The European Union’s Free Trade Agreement with Singapore – One Step Forward, 28 Steps Back? in International Investment Treaties and Arbitration Across Asia (Julien Chaisse & Luke Nottage eds. 2018)Google Scholar

Natalegawa, Marty, Does ASEAN Matter? A View from Within (2018)Google Scholar

Network Power: Japan and Asia (Peter J. Katzenstein & Takashi Shiraishi eds. 1997)Google Scholar

Nikomborirak, Deunden & Jitdumrong, Supunnavadee, ASEAN Trade in Services, in The ASEAN Economic Community: A Work in Progress (Sanchita Basu Das ed. 2013)Google Scholar

Ogita, Tatsushi, Japan: The Structure of Complete Objection, in Trade Liberalization and APEC (Jiro Okamoto ed. 2004)Google Scholar

Ostry, Sylvia, The Uruguay Round North-South Grand Bargain: Implications for Future Negotiations, in The Political Economy of International Trade Law: Essays in Honor of Robert E. Hudec (Daniel L. M. Kennedy & James D. Southwick eds. 2002)Google Scholar

Paradigm Shift in International Economic Law Rule-Making: TPP as a New Model for Trade Arrangements? (Julien Chaisse et al. eds. 2017)Google Scholar

Peet, Richard & Hartwick, Elaine, Theories of Development: Contentions, Arguments, Alternatives (3d ed. 2015)Google Scholar

Pempel, T. J., Transpacific Torri: Japan and the Emerging Asian Regionalism, in Network Power: Japan and Asia (Peter J. Katzenstein & Takashi Shiraishi eds. 1997)Google Scholar

Rashid, Zakariah et al., Regional Market for Goods, Services, and Skilled Labor, in Realizing the ASEAN Economic Community: A Comprehensive Assessment (Michael G. Plummer & Chia Siow Yue eds. 2009)Google Scholar

Ravenhill, John, APEC and the Construction of Pacific Rim Regionalism (2001)Google Scholar

Rodrik, Dani, Straight Talk on Trade: Ideas for a Sane World Economy (2018)Google Scholar

Rolland, Sonia E., Development at the WTO (2012)Google Scholar

Roloff, Ralf, Interregionalism in Theoretical Perspective: State of the Art, in Interregionalism and International Relations: A Stepping Stone to Global Governance? (Jürgen Ruland et al. 2005)Google Scholar

Romanchyshyna, Iulianna, Tackling Technical Barriers to Trade in EU “New Generation” FTAs: An Example of Open or Conflicting Regionalism? in Global Politics and EU Trade Policy: Facing the Challenges to a Multilateral Approach, Special Issue: Eur. YB Int’l Econ. L. (Wolfgang Weiß & Cornelia Furculita eds. 2020)Google Scholar

Rossman, Ithnain, The Goods Package, in The United States-Singapore Free Trade Agreement: Highlights and Insights (Tommy Koh & Chang Li Lin eds. 2004)Google Scholar

Ruland, Jürgen, Interregionalism: An Unfinished Agenda, in Interregionalism and International Relations: A Stepping Stone to Global Governance? (Jürgen Ruland et al. 2005)Google Scholar

Sally, Razeen, Southeast Asia in the WTO (2004)Google Scholar

Sally, Razeen, ASEAN FTAs: State of Play and Outlook for ASEAN’s Regional and Global Integration, in The ASEAN Economic Community: A Work in Progress (Sanchita Basu Das et al. eds. 2013)Google Scholar

Sasradipoera, Kanya Satyani, ASEAN Trade in Goods Agreement (ATIGA), in ASEAN: Life after the Charter (S. Tiwari ed. 2010)Google Scholar

Severino, Rodolfo C., Southeast Asia in Search of an ASEAN Community: Insights from the Former ASEAN Secretary-General (2006)Google Scholar

Severino, Rodolfo C., Japan’s Relations with ASEAN, in ASEAN-Japan Relations (Takashi Shiraishi & Takaaki Kojima eds. 2014)Google Scholar

Siong, David Chin Soon, ASEAN’s Journey towards Free Trade, in Economic Diplomacy: Essays and Reflections by Singapore’s Negotiations (C. L. Lim & Margaret Liang eds. 2011)Google Scholar

So, Alvin Y., Social Change and Development: Modernization, Dependency, and World-System Theories (1990)Google Scholar

Söderbaum, Fredrik, Rethinking Regionalism (2016)Google Scholar

Söderbaum, Fredrik, Old, New, and Comparative Regionalism: The History and Scholarly Development of the Field, in The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Regionalism (Tanja A. Borzel & Thomas Risse 2016)Google Scholar

Soesastro, Hadi, Revamping APEC’s Concerted Unilateral Liberalization, in APEC at 20: Recall, Reflect, Remake (K. Kesavapany and Hank Lim eds. 2009)Google Scholar

Sudo, Sueo, Japan’s ASEAN Policy: In Search of Proactive Multilateralism (2015)Google Scholar

Telò, Mario, Introduction: Globalization, New Regionalism and the Role of the European Union, in European Union and New Regionalism: Competing Regionalism and Global Governance in a Post-Hegemonic Era (Mario Telò ed. 2014)Google Scholar

Yean, Tham Siew & Das, Sanchita Basu, Introduction: The ASEAN Economic Community and Conflicting Domestic Interests, in Moving the AEC Beyond 2015: Managing Domestic Consensus for Community-Building (Tham Siew Yean & Sanchita Basu Das eds. 2016)Google Scholar

Thomas, Chantal & Trachtman, Joel P., Editors’ Introduction, in Developing Countries in the WTO Legal System (Chantal Thomas & Joel P. Trachtman eds. 2009)Google Scholar

The China-Australia Free Trade Agreement: A 21st Century Model (Colin B. Picker et al. eds. 2018)Google Scholar

Titi, Catherine, Recent Developments in International Investment Law, in 2018:9 Eur. YB Int’l Econ. L. (Marc Bungenberg et al. eds. 2019)Google Scholar

Townsend, Belinda, Update on the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement – NGO Briefing (2015)Google Scholar

Venzke, Ingo and Thio, Li-Ann, The Internal Effects of ASEAN External Relations (2016)Google Scholar

Voon, Tania & Sheargold, Elizabeth, Australia, China and the Co-Existence of Successive International Investment Agreements, in The China-Australia Free Trade Agreement: A 21st Century Model (Colin B. Picker et al. eds. 2017)Google Scholar

Weiler, J. H. H., ASEAN Law, the ASEAN Way and the Role of Domestic Courts, in The ASEAN Law Conference 2018: A Compendium of Speeches, Papers, Presentations and Reports 43 (2019)Google Scholar

Wohlforth, William C., Realism, in The Oxford Handbook of International Relations 131 (Christian Reus-Smit & Duncan Snidal eds. 2008)Google Scholar

Woon, Walter, The ASEAN Charter: A Commentary (2016)Google Scholar

Yamazawa, Ippei, APEC’s Achievements and Tasks, in APEC in the 21st Century (Riyana Miranti & Denis Hew eds. 2004)Google Scholar

Yamazawa, Ippei, APEC: New Agenda in Its Third Decade (2012)Google Scholar

Yanai, Akiko, Characteristics of APEC Trade Liberalization: A Comparative Analysis with the WTO, in Trade Liberalization and APEC (Jiro Okamoto ed. 2004)Google Scholar

Yeo, Lay Hwee, EU-ASEAN Security Cooperation, in EU Security Strategies: Extending the EU System of Security Governance (Spyros Economides & James Sperling eds. 2018)Google Scholar

Ahearn, Raymond J. & Morrison, Wayne M., U.S.-Thailand Free Trade Agreements, CRS Report (2006)Google Scholar

AIPO, Resolution of the Ninth General Assembly of AIPO on the ASEAN-EC Economic Cooperation, WC/GA9/88/KL/29/6 (1988)Google Scholar

Analyst in Asian Affairs, Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division, The Vietnam-U.S. Bilateral Trade Agreement, CRS Report (2002)Google Scholar

APEC Counter-Terrorism Working Group Strategic Plan 2018–2020 (2017)Google Scholar

APEC Economic Leaders’ Declaration (2001)Google Scholar

APEC Non-Binding Investment Principles (2011)Google Scholar

APEC Non-binding Principles for Domestic Regulation of the Services Sector (2018)Google Scholar

APEC Policy Support Unit Governance Arrangements (2018)Google Scholar

APEC PSU, Annual Report 2018 (2018)Google Scholar

APEC PSU, APEC in Charts 2019 (2019)Google Scholar

APEC PSU, APEC Regional Trends Analysis: Counting What Counts (2019)Google Scholar

APEC PSU, APEC Supply-Chain Connectivity Framework Action Plan 2017–2020: Interim Review of External Indicators (2019)Google Scholar

APEC PSU, APEC’s Bogor Goals Progress Report (2018)Google Scholar

APEC PSU, APEC’s Ease of Doing Business – Final Assessment 2015–2018 (2019)Google Scholar

APEC PSU Five-Year Strategic Plan 2013–2017 (2013)Google Scholar

APEC PSU, Peer Review and Capacity Building on APEC Infrastructure Development and Investment: The Philippines (2017)Google Scholar

APEC PSU, The Mutual Usefulness between APEC and TPP (2011)Google Scholar

APEC PSU, Trends and Developments in Provisions and Outcomes of RTA/FTAs Implemented in 2017 by APEC Economies (2018)Google Scholar

APEC Secretariat, APEC Guidebook on Quality of Infrastructure Development and Investment (Revision) (2018)Google Scholar

APEC Secretariat, APEC Outcomes & Outlook 2018–2019 (2019)Google Scholar

APEC Secretariat, APEC Secretariat’s 2019 Operational Plan (2019)Google Scholar

APEC Secretariat, APEC’s Second Trade Facilitation Action Plan (2007)Google Scholar

APEC Secretariat, Guidelines for Hosting APEC Meetings (2017)Google Scholar

APEC Secretariat, IAP Peer Review: Review Teams, Timeline and List of Experts, 2008/SOM1/014, March 2–3, 2008Google Scholar

APEC Secretariat, Supporting Continued Growth in Trade and Facilitation: End to End Review of the APEC Business Travel Card Scheme Final Report (2014)Google Scholar

APEC Vision Group, Report of the APEC Vision Group – People and Prosperity: An APEC Vision to 2040 (2019)Google Scholar

APEC’s Achievements in Trade Facilitation in 2007–2010: Final Assessment of the Second Trade Facilitation Action (TFAP II) (2012)Google Scholar

ASEAN, ASEAN Economic Community 2025 Consolidated Strategic Action Plan (2017)Google Scholar

ASEAN, ASEAN Integration Report 2019 (2019)Google Scholar

ASEAN, ASEAN Key Figures 2019 (2019)Google Scholar

ASEAN, ASEAN Key Figures 2020 (2020)Google Scholar

ASEAN, ASEAN Mutual Recognition Arrangement on Tourism Professionals (MRA): Handbook (2013)Google Scholar

ASEAN, ASEAN Services Report 2017: The Evolving Landscape (2017)Google Scholar

ASEAN, Investing in ASEAN: Association of Southeast Asian Nations (2019/2020)Google Scholar

ASEAN, Master Plan on ASEAN Connectivity 2025 (2016)Google Scholar

ASEAN and the EU Through the Years, in 6/2016 ASEAN Focus 12 (2016)Google Scholar

ASEAN Business Advisory Council & EU-ASEAN Business Council, Non-Tariff Barriers (NTBs) in ASEAN and Their Elimination from a Business Perspective (2019)Google Scholar

ASEAN Comprehensive Investment Agreement: A Guidebook for Businesses & Investors (2d 2015)Google Scholar

ASEAN Framework for Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (2011)Google Scholar

ASEAN Historical Timeline, in 50 Years of ASEAN and Singapore (Tommy Koh et al. eds. 2017)Google Scholar

ASEAN-EU Vision Group, Report of the ASEAN-EU Vision Group: Transregional Partnership for Shared and Sustainable Prosperity (2006)Google Scholar

ASEAN Secretariat, A Historic Milestone for FDI and MNEs in ASEAN (2017)Google Scholar

ASEAN Secretariat, ASEAN Integration Report 2019 (2019)Google Scholar

ASEAN Secretariat, ASEAN Key Figures 2020 (2020)Google Scholar

ASEAN Secretariat & World Bank, ASEAN Integration Monitoring Report (2013)Google Scholar

ASEAN & UNCTAD, ASEAN Investment Report 2019: FDI in Services: Focus on Health Care (2019)Google Scholar

ASEAN +3 Macroeconomic Research Office, Theme: ASEAN+3 Region 20 Years after the Asian Financial Crisis, ASEAN+3 Regional Economic Outlook 2017 (2017)Google Scholar

Asian Development Bank, Asia 2050: Realizing the Asian Century: Executive Summary (2011)Google Scholar

Asian Development Bank, Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement: Overview and Economic Impact, ADB Brief, No. 164 (2020)Google Scholar

Asian Development Bank Institute, ASEAN 2030: Toward a Borderless Economic Community 201 (2014)Google Scholar

Asian Trade Centre, Ten Benefits of the Comprehensive and Progressive Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) (2018)Google Scholar

Aspirations, Opportunities and Challenges in 2015 and Beyond, IOM-MPI Issues in Brief, No. 11 (2014)Google Scholar

Australia Government, 2017 Foreign Policy White Paper (2017)Google Scholar

Bayhaqi, Akhmad et al., Trade Facilitation in APEC: Progress and Impact, APEC PSU Policy Brief No. 25 (2019)Google Scholar

Best Practices for RTAs/FTAs in APEC (2004)Google Scholar

Boustany, Charles W. Jr. & Freidberg, Aaron L., Answering China’s Economic Challenge: Preserving Power, Enhancing Prosperity, NBR Report, No. 76 (2019)Google Scholar

Centre for Economics and Business Research, World Economic League Table 2021 (2020)Google Scholar

Chanlett-Avery, Emma et al., Thailand: Background and U.S. Relations, CRS Report (2015)Google Scholar

Cimino-Isaacs, Cathleen D., Labor Enforcement Issues in U.S. FTAs, CRS: In Focus (2000)Google Scholar

Clifford Chance, The EU-Japan Economic Partnership Agreement: A Different Kind of Treaty? (2018)Google Scholar

Commission of the European Communities, A New Partnership with South East Asia, COM(2003) 399 final (2003)Google Scholar

Commissions of the European Communities, Communication from the Commission: A New Partnership with South East Asia, COM (2003) 399 final (2003)Google Scholar

Commission of the European Communities, Creating a New Dynamic in EU-ASEAN Relations, COM(96) 314 final (1996)Google Scholar

Commission of the European Communities, Europe and Asia: A Strategic Framework for Enhanced Partnerships, COM(2001) 469 final (2001)Google Scholar

Commission of the European Communities, Report on the State of Play of the FTA Negotiations with ASEAN, India, the Andean Community and Central America, SEC(2009) 681 final (2009)Google Scholar

Commission of the European Communities, Towards a New Asia Strategy, COM(94) 314 final (1994)Google Scholar

Committee on Trade and Investment (CTI) Chair, The Individual Action Plan (IAP) and IAP Peer Review, 2011/SOM2/021anx2 (2011)Google Scholar

Communication from Chile and the Republic of Korea, Best Practices for FTAs/FTAs in APEC, TN/RL/W/187, Sept. 12, 2005Google Scholar

Concept Paper for the Expansion of the ITA, Communication from Canada, Japan, Korea, the Separate Customs Territory of Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu, Singapore and the United States, G/IT/W/36, May 2, 2012Google Scholar

Coper, William H., The EU-South Korea Free Trade Agreement and Its Implications for the United States, CRS Report (2011)Google Scholar

CPTPP Statement on the Occasion of the Third Commission Meeting (2020)Google Scholar

Chair, CTI, Annex 2 – APEC Cross-Border E-Commerce Facilitation Framework, 2017/SOM3/027anx02 (2017)Google Scholar

Chair, CTI, Annex 4 – The Conduct of the Trade Policy Dialogue on WTO-Plus Elements of RTAs/FTAs and the Trade Policy Dialogue Outcomes Report, 2017/SOM2/018anx04 (2017)Google Scholar

Chair, CTI, The Individual Action Plan (IAP) and IAP Peer Review, 2011/SOM2/021anx2, May 17–18, 2011Google Scholar

CTI Report to Ministers, Collective Strategic Study on Issues Related to the Realization of the FTAAP (2016)Google Scholar

Delegation of the European Union to Vietnam, Guide to the EU-Vietnam Trade and Investment Agreements (2016)Google Scholar

Department of Defense, Indo-Pacific Strategy Report: Preparedness, Partnerships, and Promoting a Networked Region (2019)Google Scholar

Department of State, A Free and Open Indo-Pacific Advancing a Shared Vision (2019)Google Scholar

DFAT, CPTPP Suspensions Explained (2019)Google Scholar

DFAT, Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership: Outcomes: Services and Investment (2020)Google Scholar

DFDL, Investment Guide: Vietnam 2020 (7th ed. 2020)Google Scholar

Dominican Republic-Central America FTA, Arbitral Panel Established Pursuant to Chapter Twenty, In the Matter of Guatemala – Issues Relating to the Obligations Under Article 16.2.1(a) of the CAFTA-DR, Final Report of the Panel (2017)Google Scholar

EU Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), Geographical Indications in the ASEAN Region: A Booklet on ASEAN Geographical Indications Procedure and Products (2019)Google Scholar

EU-ASEAN Business Council, 2020 EU-ASEAN Sentiment Survey (2020)Google Scholar

European Chamber of Commerce in Vietnam (EuroCham), 2019 EVFTA Report: The EU-Vietnam Free Trade Agreement: Perspectives from Vietnam (2019)Google Scholar

European Commission, Cambodia Loses Duty-Free Access to the EU Market over Human Rights Concerns (2020)Google Scholar

European Commission, Client and Supplier Countries of the EU 27 in Merchandise Trade (Value %) (2019, Excluding Intra-EU Trade) (2019)Google Scholar

European Commission, Consultation Strategy: Impact Assessment on the Establishment of a Multilateral Investment Court for Investment Dispute Resolution (2016)Google Scholar

European Commission, Europe’s Moment: Repair and Prepare for the Next Generation, COM(2020) 456 final (2020)Google Scholar

European Commission, EU-China Geographical Indications (2020)Google Scholar

European Commission, EU-Mercosur Trade Agreement: Building Bridges for Trade and Sustainable Development (2019)Google Scholar

European Commission, EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement: A New Relationship, with Big Changes (2020)Google Scholar

European Commission, EU-Vietnam Trade Agreement Enters into Force (2020)Google Scholar

European Commission, Factsheet : A New EU Agreement with Japan (2018)Google Scholar

European Commission, Global Europe: Competing in the World (2006)Google Scholar

European Commission, Human Rights and Sustainable Development in the EU-Vietnam Relations with Specific Regard to the EU-Vietnam Free Trade Agreement (2016)Google Scholar

European Commission, Key Elements of the EU-China Comprehensive Agreement on Investment (2020)Google Scholar

European Commission, Overview of FTA and Other Trade Negotiations (Updated Aug. 2020)Google Scholar

European Commission, Report from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on Implementation of Free Trade Agreements: 1 January 2016 – 31 December 2016, COM(2017) 654 final (2017)Google Scholar

European Commission, Report from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: Report on the Implementation of the Trade Policy Strategy Trade for All: Delivering a Progressive Trade Policy to Harness Globalisation, COM (2017) 491 final (2017)Google Scholar

European Commission, State of the Union Address 2020 (2020)Google Scholar

European Commission, Trade for All: Towards a More Responsible Trade and Investment Policy (2015)Google Scholar

European Commission, Trade in Services Agreement (TiSA): Factsheet (2016)Google Scholar

European Commission, 2020 Strategic Foresight Report (2020)Google Scholar

European Commission & High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, EU-China – Strategic Outlook, Joint (2019) 5 final (2019)Google Scholar

European Ombudsman, Decision in Case 1409/2014/MHZ on the European Commission’s Failure to Carry Out a Prior Human Rights Impact Assessment of the EU-Vietnam Free Trade Agreement (2016)Google Scholar

European Parliament, CJEU Opinion on the EU-Singapore Agreement (2017)Google Scholar

European Parliament, Driving Trade in the ASEAN Region: Progress of FTA Negotiations (2016)Google Scholar

European Parliament, European Parliament Resolution on Regional Free Trade Areas and Trade Strategy in the European Union (2002/2044(INI)), P5_TA(2003)0237 (2003)Google Scholar

European Parliament, European Parliament Resolution of 25 November 2010 on Human Rights and Social and Environmental Standards in International Trade Agreements, P7(2010)0434 (2010)Google Scholar

European Parliament, European Parliament Resolution of 17 April 2014 on the State of Play of the EU-Vietnam Free Trade Agreement, P7_TA(2014)0458 (2014)Google Scholar

European Parliament, European Parliament Resolution of 7 October 2020 on the Implementation of the Common Commercial Policy – Annual Report 2018, P9_TA-PROV(2020)0252 (2020)Google Scholar

European Parliament, EU-Singapore Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (Resolution), P8-TA(2019)0093 (2019)Google Scholar

European Parliament, Factsheet on the European Union: The Treaty of Lisbon (2020)Google Scholar

European Parliament, Free Trade Agreement between the EU and the Republic of Singapore – Analysis (2018)Google Scholar

European Parliament, Human Rights in EU Trade Agreements: The Human Rights Clause and its Application (2019)Google Scholar

European Parliament, Legislative Train 09.2020 (2020)Google Scholar

European Parliament, Resolution on the Situation in South-East Asia, A3-0219/91 (1991)Google Scholar

European Parliament, Southeast Asia, Fact Sheets on the European Union (2020)Google Scholar

European Parliament, The Generalised Scheme of Preferences Regulation (No 978/2012): European Implementation Assessment (2018)Google Scholar

European Services Forum, Letter to the Commissioner for Trade, 12 July 2020Google Scholar

Evaluation Unit et al., Evaluation of EC Co-Cooperation with ASEAN: Final Report, vol. 2 (2009)Google Scholar

EU, EU-Vietnam Free Trade Agreement Enters into Force as of 1 August 2020 (2020)Google Scholar

FDI in Services: Focus on Health Care (2019)Google Scholar

Fergusson, Ian F. & Williams, Brock R., The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP): Key Provisions and Issues for Congress, CRS Report (2016)Google Scholar

Fergusson, Ian F. & Vaughn, Bruce, The Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement, CRS Report (2011)Google Scholar

Foreword by Singapore Minister for Communications & Information and Minister-in-Charge of Trade Relations S Iswaran, in European Commission & MTI, European Union – Singapore Trade and Investment Agreements (2019)Google Scholar

General Council Decision, TRIPS Non-Violation and Situation Complaints Moratorium, WT/L/1080, Dec. 1, 2019Google Scholar

Gloudeman, Lauren & Salidjanova, Nargiza, Policy Considerations for Negotiating a U.S.-China Bilateral Investment Treaty, U.S. China Economic and Security Review Commission Staff Research Report (2016)Google Scholar

Google et al., SEA Internet Economy Report 2019 (2019)Google Scholar

Green, Michael et al., Powers, Norms, and Institutions: The Future of the Indo-Pacific from a Southeast Asia Perspective, Results of a CSIS Survey of Strategic Elites (2020)Google Scholar

Guiding Principles and Objectives for Negotiating the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (2012)Google Scholar

Hsu, Locknie et al., Improving Connectivity between ASEAN’s Legal Systems to Address Commercial Issues (2018)Google Scholar

Hurley, John, Examining the Debt Implications of the Belt and Road Initiative from a Policy Perspective, CGD Policy Paper (2018)Google Scholar

ISEAS-Yusof Ishal Institute, The State of Southeast Asia: 2020 Survey Report (2002)Google Scholar

Joint Leaders’ Statement on the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) (2019)Google Scholar

Joint Local Statement on the Death Penalty Case of Moad Fadzir bin Mustaffa in Singapore (2020)Google Scholar

Kuriyama, Carlos & Ogazon, Azul, Expanding the Information Technology Agreement, APEC PSU Brief No. 6 (2013)Google Scholar

Letter from María L. Pagán, Acting United States Trade Representative, to the Trans-Pacific Partnership Depositary, Jan. 30, 2017Google Scholar

Martin, Michael F., The Proposed U.S. Malaysia Free Trade Agreement, CRS Report (2008)Google Scholar

Martin, Michael F., U.S. Restrictions on Relations with Burma, CRS Report (2020)Google Scholar

Martin, Michael F., U.S.-Vietnam Economic and Trade Relations: Issues in 2019, CRS: In Focus (2019)Google Scholar

Mckinsey Global Institute, Digital Globalization: The New Era of Global Flows (2016)Google Scholar

Meltzer, Joshua P. and Neena Shenai, The US-China Economic Relationship: A Comprehensive Approach, Brookings Policy Brief (2019)Google Scholar

Ministry of Trade and Trade Industry Singapore, Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership Signed (2020)Google Scholar

MTI, A Guide to Understanding the ASEAN-China Free Trade Area Upgrade (2016)Google Scholar

Murrill, Brandon J., The WTO’s Appellate Body Loses Its Quorum: Is This the Beginning of the End for the “Rules-Based Trading System”? CRS Legal Sidebar (2019)Google Scholar

New Zealand Foreign Affairs & Trade, Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership: National Interest Analysis (2020)Google Scholar

New Zealand’s CPTPP Investor-State Dispute Settlement Side Letters with Australia, Brunei, Malaysia, Peru and Vietnam (2018)Google Scholar

Office of the Secretary of State, The Elements of the China Challenge (2020)Google Scholar

Office of the Spokesperson, U.S. 2019 APEC Outcomes, Dec. 19, 2019Google Scholar

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Leveraging Digital Trade to Fight the Consequences of COVID-19 (2020)Google Scholar

Outline of the RCEP Agreement (as at November 2017), in Joint Leaders’ Statement on the Negotiations for the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) (2017)Google Scholar

Possible reform of Investor-State dispute settlement (ISDS): Comments by the Government of Indonesia: Note by the Secretariat, A/CN.9/WG.III/WP.156, Nov. 9, 2018Google Scholar

Post-Cabinet Press Conference: Monday, Oct. 31, 2017 (2017)Google Scholar

Presence of Natural Persons (Mode 4), S/C/W/301, Sept. 15, 2009Google Scholar

President of the United States, National Security Strategy of the United States of America (2017)Google Scholar

PWC, The Long View: How Will the Global Economic Order Change by 2050? (2017)Google Scholar

Rana, Pradumna B & Xianbai, Ji, BRI’s “Debt Trap Diplomacy,” RISI Commentary, No. 191 (2020)Google Scholar

RCEP: A Guide to the World’s Largest Trade Agreement, Asia House Advisory Briefing (2020)Google Scholar

Report of the East Asian Vision Group II (EAVGII) (2012)Google Scholar

Resolution of the Sixth AIPO General Assembly on ASEAN-EC Economic Cooperation, 6 GA/RES.11/83 (1983)Google Scholar

Res, S.. 311 (111th Congress) (2009)Google Scholar

Res, S.. 218 (112th Congress) (2011)Google Scholar

Sajjanhar, Ashok, Taking Stock of India’s “Act East Policy,” ORF Issue Brief, No. 142 (2016)Google Scholar

Schnepf, Randy, WTO Doha Round: Implications for U.S. Agriculture, CRS Report (2014)Google Scholar

Sharma, Sachin Kumar et al., A Quantitative Assessment of India’s Withdrawal from RCEP: Issues and Concerns (2020)Google Scholar

Singapore Customs, Application Procedures for a Certificate of Origin via TradeNet and Related Administrative Matters (2020)Google Scholar

Singapore International Chamber of Commerce, Plain English Guide to the European Union-Singapore Free Trade Agreement (2020)Google Scholar

Singapore International Commercial Court Users Guide (2019)Google Scholar

Singapore International Dispute Resolution Academy, SIDRA International Dispute Resolution Survey: 2020 Final Report (2020)Google Scholar

Spak, Gregory et al., Overview of Chapter 4 (Rules of Origin) of the US-Mexico-Canada Trade Agreement (2018)Google Scholar

Special Issue: UNCITRAL and Investment Arbitration Reform: Matching Concerns and Solutions (Malcolm Langford et al. eds.) in 21: 2–3J. World Invest. & Trade (2020)Google Scholar

Specialist in Asian Affairs & Specialist in International Trade and Finance, Vietnam PNTR Status and WTO Accession Issues and Implications for the United States, CRS Report (2007)Google Scholar

Statement by the President on the Signing of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (2016)Google Scholar

State Council, 国务院关于加快实施自由贸易区战略的若干意见 [Several Opinions of the State Council on Accelerating the Implementation of the Strategies for Free Trade Areas] (2015)Google Scholar

Sugiyarto, Guntur & Agunias, Dovelyn Rannveig, A “Freer” Flow of Skilled Labour within ASEAN: Aspirations, Opportunities and Challenges in 2015 and Beyond, IOM-MPI Issues in Brief, No. 11 (2014)Google Scholar

Summary of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (2020)Google Scholar

Summary Report of Competition Policy and Law Group Meeting 2012, 2013/SOM1.CPLG/002 (2013)Google Scholar

Sustainable Development Goals, in United Nations General Assembly, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, A/Res/70/1 (2015), goal 9.1Google Scholar

The European Community and ASEAN, in Europe Information: External Relations, 16/79 (1979)Google Scholar

Trans-Pacific Partnership Leaders Statement (2015)Google Scholar

UNCTAD, ASEAN at 50: Achievements and Challenges in Regional Integration (2017)Google Scholar

UNCTAD, International Classification on Non-Tariff Measures (2019)Google Scholar

UNCTAD, Investment Trends Monitor (2021)Google Scholar

UNCTAD, Non-tariff Measures: Evidence from Selected Developing Countries and Future Research Agenda: Developing Countries in International Trade Studies (2010)Google Scholar

UNCTAD, RCEP Agreement as a Potential Boost for Investment in Sustainable Post-COVID Recovery, Investment Trends Monitor (2020)Google Scholar

UNCTAD, The Asian Developmental State and the Flying Geese Paradigm, No. 213 (2013)Google Scholar

UNCTAD, World Investment Report 2019 (2019)Google Scholar

UNCTAD, World Investment Report 2020 (2020)Google Scholar

UNCTAD Secretariat, Core Elements of International Investment Agreements in Domestic Investment Frameworks in the APEC Region (2011)Google Scholar

UNESCAP, Asia-Pacific Trade and Investment Report 2016: Recent Trends and Development (2016)Google Scholar

UNESCAP, Complementarities between the ASEAN Community Vision 2025 and the United Nations 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development: A Framework for Action (2017)Google Scholar

UNESCAP & UNCTAD, Asia-Pacific Trade and Investment Report 2019: Navigating Non-tariff Measures towards Sustainable Development (2019)Google Scholar

United Nations, South-South Trade in Asia: The Role of Regional Trade Agreements (2008)Google Scholar

U.S. Chamber of Commerce, The Next Stage of US-Vietnam Relations: A Blueprint to Deepen Trade and Investment Ties (2019)Google Scholar

USITC, The Pros and Cons of Entering Into Negotiations on Free Trade Area Agreements with Taiwan, the Republic of Korea, and ASEAN, or the Pacific Rim Region in General: Reports to the Senate Committee on Finance on Investigation No. TA-332–259 under Section 332 of the Tariff Act of 1930, USITC Publications 2166 (1989)Google Scholar

USTR, Fact Sheet: Economic and Trade Agreement between the United States of America and the People’s Republic of China (2000)Google Scholar

USTR, National Trade Policy for 2017 (2017)Google Scholar

USTR, United States-Japan Trade Agreement (USJTA) Negotiations: Summary of Specific Negotiating Objectives (2018)Google Scholar

Vaughn, Bruce, U.S. Strategic and Defense Relationship in the Asia-Pacific Region, CRS Report (2007)Google Scholar

Vietnam Ministry of Industry and Trade, Vietnamese-German Cooperation Research Projects on Wind Power (2017)Google Scholar

White House, Interim National Security Strategic Guidance (2021)Google Scholar

Williams, Brock R. & Cook, Nicolas, The African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA), CRS: In Focus (2020)Google Scholar

Woodhead, Geoffrey, The Role of Peer Reviews in APEC, First OECD-South East Asia Regional Forum: Peer Review Mechanisms – Macroeconomic Policies, Regional Economic Integration and Economic Development (2007)Google Scholar

World Bank, Vietnam: Deepening International Integration and Implementing the EVFTA (2020)Google Scholar

WTO Appellate Body Report, Mexico – Tax Measures on Soft Drinks and Other Beverages, WT/DS308/AB/R (2006)Google Scholar

WTO Appellate Body Report, Peru – Additional Duty on Imports of Certain Agricultural Products, WT/DS457/AB/R (2015)Google Scholar

WTO, Background Note by Secretariat, Council for Trade in Services: Mode 3 – Commercial Presence, S/C/W/314 (2010)Google Scholar

WTO, DS590: Japan – Measures Related to the Exportation of Products and Technology to KoreaGoogle Scholar

WTO, European Union – Certain Measures concerning Palm Oil and Oil Palm Crop-based Biofuels, WT/DS593/1, G/L/1348, G/TBTB/D/52, G/SCM/D128/1 (2019)Google Scholar

WTO, Mode 3 – Commercial Presence, S/C/W/314, Apr. 7, 2010Google Scholar

WTO, Panel Report, European Communities and Its Member States – Tariff Treatment of Certain Information Technology Products, WT/DS375/R, WT/DS376/R, WT/DS377/R, Aug. 16, 2010 (EC-IT Products)Google Scholar

WTO, Panel Report, Russia – Measures Concerning Traffic in Transit, WT/DS512/R (2019)Google Scholar

WTO, Panel Report, United States – Tariff Measures on Certain Goods from China, WT/DS543/R (2020)Google Scholar

WTO, Request for Consultations by Hong Kong, China, United States – Origin Marking Requirement, WT/DS597/1, G/L1365, G/RO/D/8, G/TBTGoogle Scholar

WTO, Trade in Medical Goods in the Context of Tackling COVID-19 (2020)Google Scholar

WTO, Trade in Services in the Context of COVID-19 (2020)Google Scholar

WTO, Trade Policy Review, Japan: Minutes of the Meeting: Addendum, WT/TPR/M/397/Add.1 (2020)Google Scholar

WTO, Trade Policy Review, Report by India, WT/TPR/G403 (2020)Google Scholar

WTO, Trade Policy Review: Report by the Secretariat: European Union, WT/TPR/S/395 (2019)Google Scholar

WTO, Trade Policy Review, Report by the Secretariat: The Philippines, WT/TPR/S/368 (2018)Google Scholar

WTO, Trade Policy Review, Report by the Secretariat, Singapore, WT/TPR.S.343 (2016)Google Scholar

WTO, World Trade Report 2011: The WTO and Preferential Trade Agreements: From Co-existence to Coherence (2011)Google Scholar

WTO, World Trade Report 2015 (2015)Google Scholar

WTO, World Trade Report 2019: The Future of Services Trade (2019)Google Scholar

WTO, World Trade Statistical Review 2019 (2019)Google Scholar

WTO, World Trade Statistics Review 2020 (2020)Google Scholar

WTO, 15 Years of the Information Technology Agreement: Trade, Innovation and Global Production Networks (2012)Google Scholar

WTO, 20 Years of the Information Technology Agreement: Boosting Trade, Innovation and Digital Connectivity (2017)Google Scholar