Aiolfi, G. and M. Pieth (2002), ‘How to Make a Convention Work: The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Recommendation and Convention on Bribery as an Example of a New Horizon in International Law’ in Fijnaut, C. and Huberts, L. (eds.), Corruption, Integrity and Law Enforcement, Leiden, Boston, 349.Google Scholar

Arnull, A.M., A.A. Dashwood, M.G. Ross and D.A. Wyatt (2000), Wyatt and Dashwood's European Union Laws, 4th edn, London.

Ashworth, A. (2002), ‘Sentencing’ in Maguire, M., Morgan, R., and Reiner, R. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Criminology, 3rd edn, Oxford, 1076.Google Scholar

Beccaria, C. (1988), Über Verbrechen und Strafen (nach der Ausgabe von 1766 übersetzt und herausgegeben von W. Alff), Frankfurt a. M.Google Scholar

Bernasconi, P. (ed.) (2000), Responding to Corruption: Social Defence, Corruption, and the Protection of Public Administration and the Independence of Justice (updated documents of the XIIIth International Congress on Social Defence, Lecce, Italy 1996), Naples.Google Scholar

Boch, C. (2000), EC Law in the UK, London.Google Scholar

Chilton, B. (2005), ‘Supreme Court strikes down Federal Sentencing Guidelines’ in Compliance Week: Columns and Editorials, January 2005 (available on: http://www.complianceweek.com).

Cole, G. F. (1995), The American System of Criminal Justice, Belmont.Google Scholar

Craig, P. and G. de Búrca (1995), EC Law: Text, Cases and Materials, Oxford.

Craufurd Smith, R. (1999), ‘Remedies for Breaches of EC Law in National Courts: Legal Variation and Selection’ in Craig, P. and Búrca, G. (eds.), The Evolution of EU Law, Oxford, 287.Google Scholar

Delmas-Marty, M. (2002), Towards a Truly Common Law: Europe as a Laboratory for Legal Pluralism, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Delmas-Marty, M. and Vervaele, J. A. E. (eds.) (2000), The Implementation of Corpus Juris in the Member States, Vol. 1, Antwerp, Groningen, Oxford.Google Scholar

Douglas-Scott, S. (2002), Constitutional Law of the European Union, Harlow.Google Scholar

Forti, G. (2000), ‘Remarks on the Role of Criminal Sanction in a Sustainable Prevention of Crimes in the Public Administration. The Italian Experience of Systemic Corruption’ in Bernasconi, P. (ed.), Responding to Corruption: Social Defence, Corruption, and the Protection of Public Administration and the Independence of Justice (updated documents of the XIIIth International Congress on Social Defence, Lecce, Italy 1996), Naples, 173.Google Scholar

Geradin, D. and Henry, D. (2005), The EC Fining Policy for Violations of Competition Law: An Empirical Review of the Commission Decisional Practice and the Community Courts' Judgments, Global Competition Law Centre (GCLC), Working Paper 03/05.Google Scholar

Gilmore, W. C. (2004), Dirty Money: The Evolution of International Measures to Counter Money Laundering and the Financing of Terrorism, 3rd edn, Strasbourg.Google Scholar

Huber, B. (2002), ‘Sanctions Against Bribery Offences in Criminal Law’ in Fijnaut, C. and Huberts, L. (eds.), Corruption, Integrity and Law Enforcement, Leiden, Boston, 137.Google Scholar

Kerse, C. and Khan, N. (2005), EC Antitrust Procedures, 5th edn, London.Google Scholar

Low, L. A. (2005), ‘Enforcement of the FCPA in the United States: Trends and the Effects of International Standards’ (presentation at the 3rd Annual Conference of the International Bar Association, International Chamber of Commerce, and Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, The Awakening Giant of Anti-Corruption Enforcement in Paris, 4–6 May 2005).Google Scholar

Pieth, M. (2006), ‘Korruption in internationalen Wirtschaftsbeziehungen’ in D. Dölling (Hrsg.), Handbuch der Korruptionseindämmung, München.Google Scholar

Pieth, M. and Eigen, P. (Hrsg.) (1999), Korruption im internationalen Geschäftsverkehr: Bestandesaufnahme, Bekämpfung, Prävention, Neuwied, Kriftel, Basel, Frankfurt a. M.Google Scholar

Tobler, C. (2005), Remedies and Sanctions in EC Non-Discrimination Law: Effective, Proportionate and Dissuasive National Sanctions and Remedies, with Particular Reference to Upper Limits on Compensation to Victims of Discrimination, Luxembourg (Office for Official Publications of the European Communities).Google Scholar

US Sentencing Commission (2004), Fifteen Years of Guidelines Sentencing (available at: http://www.ussc.gov).

Hirsch, A. (1987), ‘The Sentencing Commission's Functions’ in A. von Hirsch, K. A. Knapp, and M. Tonry, The Sentencing Commission and its Guidelines, Boston, 3.Google Scholar

Hirsch, A. and Ashworth, A. (2005), Proportionate Sentencing: Exploring the Principles, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hirsch, A., Knapp, K. A., and Tonry, M. (1987), The Sentencing Commission and its Guidelines, Boston.Google Scholar

Walther, S. (2004), ‘Communication over Confrontation: Modern Criminal Procedure in Transformation’ in A. Eser and C. Rabenstein (Hrsg.), Strafjustiz im Spannungsfeld von Effizienz und Fairness, Berlin, 367.Google Scholar