Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- Preface
- Introduction: Some Preliminary Conjectures
- Chapter 1 University Clubs and Societies and the Organization of Knowledge
- Chapter 2 Learned Societies, Clubs, and Coteries: Some Knowledge Nodes
- Chapter 3 Members of Learned Societies
- Chapter 4 Matter: The Work of Learned Societies, Clubs, and Coteries
- Chapter 5 Manner: The Formation of Commensurability
- Chapter 6 Knowledge and Power
- Some Concluding Observations
- Bibliography
- Index
Introduction: Some Preliminary Conjectures
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 May 2021
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- Preface
- Introduction: Some Preliminary Conjectures
- Chapter 1 University Clubs and Societies and the Organization of Knowledge
- Chapter 2 Learned Societies, Clubs, and Coteries: Some Knowledge Nodes
- Chapter 3 Members of Learned Societies
- Chapter 4 Matter: The Work of Learned Societies, Clubs, and Coteries
- Chapter 5 Manner: The Formation of Commensurability
- Chapter 6 Knowledge and Power
- Some Concluding Observations
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
[I]ntellect like other human agents, depends much on its environment. Through this environment intellect may be a light for certain ‘veracities’ and all darkness for others. By this environment intellect may be blinded and debased, or may be neutralized and enfeebled. There may be states of society, and an apparatus of human life, in which the myriad forms of human self regard are so developed as to bind the soul in a network which though invisible is of steel, the scales of sympathy and antipathy so weighted, as to impart a hopeless bias to character in the wrong direction, among those very classes which (as I believe) are best endowed by nature to have the largest opportunities from position, so that in extreme cases all the advantages of intellect may be nullified by darkening moral influences and those who ought to know the best and do the best may become a standing conspiracy against things the truest, the greatest and noblest against all the redeeming forces of our nature.
W. E. GladstoneFor scholarship is as jealous a mistress as most others, and demands not only a man's time but his undivided allegiance.
Gilbert MurrayIt is more important to love the truth than to attain or comprehend it.
George Tyrrell‘Only connect’: E. M. Forster's famous phrase was not only advice for satisfactory personal lives, it is also a motto that can serve as a clue to the understanding of cognition. Arthur Balfour illustrated something of the nature of these social and mental connections when he displayed the local, diffuse, and, in some sense, private character of the formation and organization of knowledge in a letter to Edward Stuart Talbot in 1878. Balfour began by indicating how a hereditary aristocracy, or at least some of its ways, was giving over to what Noel Annan famously called the intellectual aristocracy:
You ask for news of what we have been doing at Whittingehame: but I will not drag you through the details of those painful days which [are] annually given up to the horrors of a shooting party. Since that scourge has been withdrawn, I have been left in tolerable peace.
Balfour described the company remaining: his brothers and sisters and his brother-in-law, Henry Sidgwick.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Publisher: Boydell & BrewerPrint publication year: 2015