Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T22:14:15.584Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
This chapter is part of a book that is no longer available to purchase from Cambridge Core

References

Richard M. Burton
Affiliation:
Duke University, North Carolina
Børge Obel
Affiliation:
Aarhus School of Business, Denmark
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Organizational Design
A Step-by-Step Approach
, pp. 225 - 228
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arrow, , Kenneth, (1974): The Limits of Organization, New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Ashby, W. R. (1956): Introduction to Cybernetics, London: Methuen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartlett, C. A., & Ghoshal, S. (1998): Managing Across Borders: The Transnational Solution, 2nd edn, Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Bartol Kathryn M. & Locke, Edwin (2000): “Incentives and Motivation,” in Rynes, Sara L. and Gerhart, Barry (eds.), Compensation in Organizations: Current Research and Practice, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp. 104–50.Google Scholar
Boudreau, M.-C., Loch, K. D., Robey, D., & Straub, D. (1998): “Going Global: Using Information Technology to Advance the Competitiveness of the Virtual Transnational Organization,” Academy of Management Executive 12(4), pp. 120–8.Google Scholar
Bourgeois, L. J., III (1980): “Strategy and Environment: A Conceptual Integration,” Academy of Management Review, 5, pp. 25–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourgeois, L. J., & Eisenhardt, K. (1988): “Strategic Decision Processes in High Velocity Environments: Four Cases in the Minicomputer Industry,” Management Science, 34, pp. 816–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bower, J. L. (2001): Merloni Elettrodomestici: Building for a New Century (HBA 9–301–112), Cambridge, MA: Trustees of Harvard College.Google Scholar
Burns, T., & Stalker, G. M. (1961): The Management of Innovation, London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Burton, R. M., & Obel, B. (1984): Designing Efficient Organizations: Modelling and Experimentation, Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Burton, R. M., & Obel, B.(1988): “Opportunism, Incentives, and the M-form Hypothesis: A Laboratory Study,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 10, pp. 99–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burton, R. M., & Obel, B.(2004): Strategic Organizational Diagnosis and Design: The Dynamics of Fit, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burton, R. M., Lauridsen, J., & Obel, B. (2002): “Return on Assets Loss from Situational and Contingency Misfits,” Management Science, 48 (11), pp. 1461–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burton, R. M., Lauridsen, J., & Obel, B.(2004): “The Impact of Organizational Climate and Strategic Fit on Firm Performance,” Human Resource Management, 43(1), pp. 67–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey, D. C., Ogden, D., & Roland, J. A. (2004): The Human Side of M & A: Leveraging the Most Important Factor in Deal Making, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Carroll, T. N., Burton, R. M., Levitt, R. E., & Kiviniemi, A. (2005): “Fallacies of Fast Track Heuristics: Implications for Organization Theory and Project Management,” submitted to Management Science.Google Scholar
Chandler, A. D. (1962): Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the Industrial Enterprises, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Choo, C. (1998): The Knowing Organization, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cullen, J. B. (2002): Multinational Management: A Strategic Approach, New York: Southwestern-Thompson Learning.Google Scholar
Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963): A Behavioral Theory of the Firm, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Davidow, W. H., & Malone, M. S. (1992): The Virtual Corporation, New York: Edward Burlingame Books/Harper Business.Google Scholar
Denison, D. R. (1996): “What is the Difference between Organizational Culture and Organizational Climate? A Native's Point of View on a Decade of Paradigm Wars,” Academy of Management Review, 21(3), pp. 619–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeSanctis, G., & Fulk, J. (eds.) (1999): Shaping Organization Form: Communication, Connection, and Community, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Donaldson, L. (2001): The Contingency Theory of Organizations, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doty, D., Glick, H. W. H., & Huber, G. P. (1993): “Fit, Equifinality, and Organizational Effectiveness: A Test of Two Configurational Theories,” Academy of Management Journal, 38(6), pp. 1196–250.Google Scholar
Duncan, R. B. (1972): “Characteristics of Organizational Environments and Perceived Environmental Uncertainty,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(3), pp. 313–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Brown, S. L. (1998): “Time Pacing: Competing in Markets that Won't Stand Still,” Harvard Business Review, 76(2), pp. 59–69.Google Scholar
Fenton, E. M., & Pettigrew A. M. (2000): “Theoretical Perspectives on New Forms of Organizing,” in Andrew, M.Pettigrew, and Evelyn, M.Fenton, (eds.), The Innovating Organization, London: Sage.Google Scholar
Galbraith, Jay R. (1973): Designing Complex Organizations,Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Galbraith, Jay R.(1974): “Organization Design: An Information Processing View,” Interfaces, 4(3), pp. 28–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbons, R. (1998): “Incentives in Organizations”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12(4), pp. 115–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, C. B., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004): “The Antecedents, Consequences, and Mediating Role of Organizational Ambidexterity,” Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), pp. 2009–226.Google Scholar
Gittell, J. H. (2003): The Southwest Airlines Way, New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Gresov, C. (1989): “Exploring Fit and Misfit with Multiple Contingencies,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 34(3), pp. 431–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gresov, C., & Drazin, R. (1997): “Equifinality: Functional Equivalence in Organization Design,” Academy of Management Review, 22(2), pp. 403–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hahn, G. J. (1999): “The Impact of Six Sigma Improvement – A Glimpse into the Future of Statistics,” The American Statistician, 53(3), pp. 208–16.Google Scholar
Håkonsson, D. D., Lauridsen, J., Obel, B., & Burton, R. (2005): “How Misfits between Strategy and Leadership affect Organizational Performance,” presented at the AOM Conference, Hawaii (submitted for publication).
Hambrick, D. C. (2003): “On the Staying Power of Defenders, Analyzers, and Prospectors,” Academy of Management Executive, 17(4), pp. 115–19.Google Scholar
Hansen, M. T., & Nohria, N. Fall (2004): “How to Build Collaborative Advantage,” MIT Sloan Management Review, 46(1,) pp. 22–30.Google Scholar
Heneman, R. L., Fisher, M. M., & Dixon, K. E. (2001): “Reward and Organizational Systems Alignment: An Expert System,” Compensation and Benefits Review, 33(6), pp. 18–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hennart, J. F. (1993): “Explaining the Swollen Middle: Why Most Transactions Are a Mix of Market and Hierarchy,” Organization Science, 4, pp. 529–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heydebrand, W. V. (1989): “New Organizational Forms,” Work and Occupations, 16(3), pp. 323–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
INSEAD (1994): “The 3M Company: Integrating Europe (A) and (B),” ECCH case collection 494–023–1 and 494–023–2.
Keen, Peter G. W., & McDonald, M. (2000): The Eprocess Edge, Berkeley, CA: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Kerr, S. (1975): “On the Folly of Rewarding A while Hoping B,” Academy of Management Journal, 18(4), pp. 769–83.Google ScholarPubMed
Kotter, J. P. (1988): The Leadership Factor, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Kottler, P. (2000): Marketing Management: The Millennium Edition, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Kowtha, N. R. (1997): “Skills, Incentives, and Control: An Integration of Agency and Transaction Cost Approaches,” Group and Organization Management, 22(1), pp. 53–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, P. R. (1981): “Organization and Environment Perspective,” in Ven, A. H. and Joyce, W. F. (eds.), Perspectives on Organization Design and Behavior, New York: Wiley, pp. 311–27.Google Scholar
Lawrence, P. R., & Lorsch, J. W. (1967): Organization and Environment, Boston: Harvard Business Press.Google Scholar
Likert, R. (1967): The Human Organizations, New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Makadok, R. (2001): “Toward a Synthesis of the Resource-based and Dynamic-capability View of Rent Creation,” Strategic Management Journal, 22, pp. 387–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, J. G. (1991): “Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning,” Organization Science, 2, pp. 71–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1991): Organizations, New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
McCall, M. W. Jr., & Hollenbeck, G. P. (2002): Developing Global Executives, Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
McGregor, D. (1969): The Human Side of Enterprise, New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Milakovich, M. E., & Gordon, G. J. (2001): Public Administration in America, Thorofare, NJ: Thompson Learning Incorporated.Google Scholar
Miles, R. E., & Snow, C. C. (1978): Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process, New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Miles, R. E., & Snow, C. C.(1986): “Network Organizations: New Concepts for New Forms,” California Management Review, 28, pp. 62–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miles, R., Snow, C. C.Mathews, J. A., Miles, G., & Coleman, H. H. Jr (1997): “Organizing in the Knowledge Age: Anticipating the Cellular Form,” Academy of Management Executive, 11(4), pp. 7–20.Google Scholar
Miller, D. (1992): “Environmental Fit Versus Internal Fit,” Organizational Science, 3(2), pp. 159–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mintzberg, H. (1983): Structures in Fives, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Nagar, Venky (2002): “Delegation and Incentive Compensation,” The Accounting Review, 77(2), pp. 379–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naman, J. L., & Slevin, D. P. (1993): “Entrepreneurship and the Concept of Fit: A Model and Empirical Tests,” Strategic Management Journal, 14(2), pp. 137–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nokia (2003): “ Fostering Innovation, ” ECCH case collection 403–040–1.
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995): The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Obel, B. (1993): “Strategi og Ledelse – Er der en sammenhæng?” in Hildebrandt, Steen (ed.), Strategi og Ledelse, Veje og Visioner mod år 2000, Herning: Systime, pp. 396–408.Google Scholar
Ouchi, W. G. (1980): “Markets, Bureaucracies, and Clans,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 25, pp. 129–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PHP Institute (1994): Matsushita Konosuke: His Life and His Legacy, Tokyo: PHP Institute.
Polanyi, M. (1996): The Tacit Dimension, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Porter, M. E. (1985): Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance, New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Powley, E. H., Fry, R. E., Barrett, F. J., & Bright, D. S. (2004): “Dialogic Democracy Meets Command and Control: Transformation through the Appreciative Inquiry Summit,” Academy of Management Executive, 18(3), pp. 67–81.Google Scholar
Quinn, R. E., & Kimberly, J. R. (1984): “Paradox, Planning, and Perseverance: Guidelines for Managerial Practice,” in Kimberly, J. R., & Quinn, R. E., (eds.), Managing Organizational Transitions, New York: Dow-Jones-Irwin, pp. 295–314.Google Scholar
Richard, M. (2001): “Toward a Synthesis of the Resource-based and Dynamic-capability Views of Rent Creation,” Strategic Management Journal, 22(5), pp. 387–401.Google Scholar
Rivkin, J., & Fleming, L. (2004): “Complexity, Networks, and Knowledge Flow,” Research Policy, 33(10), pp. 1615–34.Google Scholar
Robbins, S. P. (1990): Organization Theory: Structure, Design and Applications, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Roberts, J. (2004): The Modern Firm: Organizational Design for Performance and Growth, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rynes, S. L., & Gerhart, B. (2000): Compensation in Organizations: Current Research and Practice, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Scott, W. R. (1998): Organizations, Rational, Natural and Open Systems, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Siggelkow, N., & Rivkin, J. (2005): “Speed and Search: Designing Organizations for Turbulence and Complexity,” Organization Science, 16(2), pp. 101–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinha, K. K., & Ven, A. (2005): “Design of Work Within and Between Organizations,” Organization Science, 16(4), pp. 389–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, A. (1904): An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sorenson, O., Rivkin, J., & Fleming, L. (2004): “Complexity, Networks, and Knowledge Flow,” Research Policy, 33(10), pp. 1615–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stinchcome, A. L. (1965): “Social Structure and Organizations,” in James, D.March, (ed.), Handbook of Organizations, Chicago: Rand McNally, pp. 142–93.Google Scholar
Tagiuri, R., & Litwin, G. H. (1968): Organizational Climate, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, J. D. (1967): Organizations in Action, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tushman, M. L., & Romanelli, E. (1985): “Organizational Evolution: A Metamorphosis Model of Convergence and Reorientation,” in Cunnings, L. L., & Stacer, B. M., (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, San Francisco: SAI Press, pp. 171–222.Google Scholar
Velstring, T., Rouse, T., & Rovit, S. (2004): “Integrate Where It Matters,” MIT Sloan Management Review, 46(1), pp. 15–18.Google Scholar
Venkatraman, N. (1989): “The Concept of Fit in Strategy Research: Towards a Verbal and Statistical Correspondence,” Academy of Management Review, 14(3), pp. 423–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, O. E. (1975): Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Woodward, J. (1965): Industrial Organization, Theory and Practice, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zammuto, R. F., & Krakower, J. Y. (1991): “Quantitative and Qualitative Studies in Organizational Culture,” Research in Organizational Change and Development, 5, pp. 83–114.Google Scholar
Zuboff, S. (1988): In the Age of the Smart Machine: The Future of Work and Power, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Arrow, , Kenneth, (1974): The Limits of Organization, New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Ashby, W. R. (1956): Introduction to Cybernetics, London: Methuen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartlett, C. A., & Ghoshal, S. (1998): Managing Across Borders: The Transnational Solution, 2nd edn, Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Bartol Kathryn M. & Locke, Edwin (2000): “Incentives and Motivation,” in Rynes, Sara L. and Gerhart, Barry (eds.), Compensation in Organizations: Current Research and Practice, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp. 104–50.Google Scholar
Boudreau, M.-C., Loch, K. D., Robey, D., & Straub, D. (1998): “Going Global: Using Information Technology to Advance the Competitiveness of the Virtual Transnational Organization,” Academy of Management Executive 12(4), pp. 120–8.Google Scholar
Bourgeois, L. J., III (1980): “Strategy and Environment: A Conceptual Integration,” Academy of Management Review, 5, pp. 25–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourgeois, L. J., & Eisenhardt, K. (1988): “Strategic Decision Processes in High Velocity Environments: Four Cases in the Minicomputer Industry,” Management Science, 34, pp. 816–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bower, J. L. (2001): Merloni Elettrodomestici: Building for a New Century (HBA 9–301–112), Cambridge, MA: Trustees of Harvard College.Google Scholar
Burns, T., & Stalker, G. M. (1961): The Management of Innovation, London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Burton, R. M., & Obel, B. (1984): Designing Efficient Organizations: Modelling and Experimentation, Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Burton, R. M., & Obel, B.(1988): “Opportunism, Incentives, and the M-form Hypothesis: A Laboratory Study,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 10, pp. 99–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burton, R. M., & Obel, B.(2004): Strategic Organizational Diagnosis and Design: The Dynamics of Fit, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burton, R. M., Lauridsen, J., & Obel, B. (2002): “Return on Assets Loss from Situational and Contingency Misfits,” Management Science, 48 (11), pp. 1461–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burton, R. M., Lauridsen, J., & Obel, B.(2004): “The Impact of Organizational Climate and Strategic Fit on Firm Performance,” Human Resource Management, 43(1), pp. 67–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey, D. C., Ogden, D., & Roland, J. A. (2004): The Human Side of M & A: Leveraging the Most Important Factor in Deal Making, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Carroll, T. N., Burton, R. M., Levitt, R. E., & Kiviniemi, A. (2005): “Fallacies of Fast Track Heuristics: Implications for Organization Theory and Project Management,” submitted to Management Science.Google Scholar
Chandler, A. D. (1962): Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the Industrial Enterprises, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Choo, C. (1998): The Knowing Organization, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cullen, J. B. (2002): Multinational Management: A Strategic Approach, New York: Southwestern-Thompson Learning.Google Scholar
Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963): A Behavioral Theory of the Firm, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Davidow, W. H., & Malone, M. S. (1992): The Virtual Corporation, New York: Edward Burlingame Books/Harper Business.Google Scholar
Denison, D. R. (1996): “What is the Difference between Organizational Culture and Organizational Climate? A Native's Point of View on a Decade of Paradigm Wars,” Academy of Management Review, 21(3), pp. 619–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeSanctis, G., & Fulk, J. (eds.) (1999): Shaping Organization Form: Communication, Connection, and Community, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Donaldson, L. (2001): The Contingency Theory of Organizations, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doty, D., Glick, H. W. H., & Huber, G. P. (1993): “Fit, Equifinality, and Organizational Effectiveness: A Test of Two Configurational Theories,” Academy of Management Journal, 38(6), pp. 1196–250.Google Scholar
Duncan, R. B. (1972): “Characteristics of Organizational Environments and Perceived Environmental Uncertainty,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(3), pp. 313–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Brown, S. L. (1998): “Time Pacing: Competing in Markets that Won't Stand Still,” Harvard Business Review, 76(2), pp. 59–69.Google Scholar
Fenton, E. M., & Pettigrew A. M. (2000): “Theoretical Perspectives on New Forms of Organizing,” in Andrew, M.Pettigrew, and Evelyn, M.Fenton, (eds.), The Innovating Organization, London: Sage.Google Scholar
Galbraith, Jay R. (1973): Designing Complex Organizations,Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Galbraith, Jay R.(1974): “Organization Design: An Information Processing View,” Interfaces, 4(3), pp. 28–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbons, R. (1998): “Incentives in Organizations”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12(4), pp. 115–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, C. B., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004): “The Antecedents, Consequences, and Mediating Role of Organizational Ambidexterity,” Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), pp. 2009–226.Google Scholar
Gittell, J. H. (2003): The Southwest Airlines Way, New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Gresov, C. (1989): “Exploring Fit and Misfit with Multiple Contingencies,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 34(3), pp. 431–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gresov, C., & Drazin, R. (1997): “Equifinality: Functional Equivalence in Organization Design,” Academy of Management Review, 22(2), pp. 403–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hahn, G. J. (1999): “The Impact of Six Sigma Improvement – A Glimpse into the Future of Statistics,” The American Statistician, 53(3), pp. 208–16.Google Scholar
Håkonsson, D. D., Lauridsen, J., Obel, B., & Burton, R. (2005): “How Misfits between Strategy and Leadership affect Organizational Performance,” presented at the AOM Conference, Hawaii (submitted for publication).
Hambrick, D. C. (2003): “On the Staying Power of Defenders, Analyzers, and Prospectors,” Academy of Management Executive, 17(4), pp. 115–19.Google Scholar
Hansen, M. T., & Nohria, N. Fall (2004): “How to Build Collaborative Advantage,” MIT Sloan Management Review, 46(1,) pp. 22–30.Google Scholar
Heneman, R. L., Fisher, M. M., & Dixon, K. E. (2001): “Reward and Organizational Systems Alignment: An Expert System,” Compensation and Benefits Review, 33(6), pp. 18–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hennart, J. F. (1993): “Explaining the Swollen Middle: Why Most Transactions Are a Mix of Market and Hierarchy,” Organization Science, 4, pp. 529–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heydebrand, W. V. (1989): “New Organizational Forms,” Work and Occupations, 16(3), pp. 323–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
INSEAD (1994): “The 3M Company: Integrating Europe (A) and (B),” ECCH case collection 494–023–1 and 494–023–2.
Keen, Peter G. W., & McDonald, M. (2000): The Eprocess Edge, Berkeley, CA: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Kerr, S. (1975): “On the Folly of Rewarding A while Hoping B,” Academy of Management Journal, 18(4), pp. 769–83.Google ScholarPubMed
Kotter, J. P. (1988): The Leadership Factor, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Kottler, P. (2000): Marketing Management: The Millennium Edition, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Kowtha, N. R. (1997): “Skills, Incentives, and Control: An Integration of Agency and Transaction Cost Approaches,” Group and Organization Management, 22(1), pp. 53–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, P. R. (1981): “Organization and Environment Perspective,” in Ven, A. H. and Joyce, W. F. (eds.), Perspectives on Organization Design and Behavior, New York: Wiley, pp. 311–27.Google Scholar
Lawrence, P. R., & Lorsch, J. W. (1967): Organization and Environment, Boston: Harvard Business Press.Google Scholar
Likert, R. (1967): The Human Organizations, New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Makadok, R. (2001): “Toward a Synthesis of the Resource-based and Dynamic-capability View of Rent Creation,” Strategic Management Journal, 22, pp. 387–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, J. G. (1991): “Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning,” Organization Science, 2, pp. 71–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1991): Organizations, New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
McCall, M. W. Jr., & Hollenbeck, G. P. (2002): Developing Global Executives, Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
McGregor, D. (1969): The Human Side of Enterprise, New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Milakovich, M. E., & Gordon, G. J. (2001): Public Administration in America, Thorofare, NJ: Thompson Learning Incorporated.Google Scholar
Miles, R. E., & Snow, C. C. (1978): Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process, New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Miles, R. E., & Snow, C. C.(1986): “Network Organizations: New Concepts for New Forms,” California Management Review, 28, pp. 62–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miles, R., Snow, C. C.Mathews, J. A., Miles, G., & Coleman, H. H. Jr (1997): “Organizing in the Knowledge Age: Anticipating the Cellular Form,” Academy of Management Executive, 11(4), pp. 7–20.Google Scholar
Miller, D. (1992): “Environmental Fit Versus Internal Fit,” Organizational Science, 3(2), pp. 159–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mintzberg, H. (1983): Structures in Fives, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Nagar, Venky (2002): “Delegation and Incentive Compensation,” The Accounting Review, 77(2), pp. 379–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naman, J. L., & Slevin, D. P. (1993): “Entrepreneurship and the Concept of Fit: A Model and Empirical Tests,” Strategic Management Journal, 14(2), pp. 137–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nokia (2003): “ Fostering Innovation, ” ECCH case collection 403–040–1.
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995): The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Obel, B. (1993): “Strategi og Ledelse – Er der en sammenhæng?” in Hildebrandt, Steen (ed.), Strategi og Ledelse, Veje og Visioner mod år 2000, Herning: Systime, pp. 396–408.Google Scholar
Ouchi, W. G. (1980): “Markets, Bureaucracies, and Clans,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 25, pp. 129–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PHP Institute (1994): Matsushita Konosuke: His Life and His Legacy, Tokyo: PHP Institute.
Polanyi, M. (1996): The Tacit Dimension, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Porter, M. E. (1985): Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance, New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Powley, E. H., Fry, R. E., Barrett, F. J., & Bright, D. S. (2004): “Dialogic Democracy Meets Command and Control: Transformation through the Appreciative Inquiry Summit,” Academy of Management Executive, 18(3), pp. 67–81.Google Scholar
Quinn, R. E., & Kimberly, J. R. (1984): “Paradox, Planning, and Perseverance: Guidelines for Managerial Practice,” in Kimberly, J. R., & Quinn, R. E., (eds.), Managing Organizational Transitions, New York: Dow-Jones-Irwin, pp. 295–314.Google Scholar
Richard, M. (2001): “Toward a Synthesis of the Resource-based and Dynamic-capability Views of Rent Creation,” Strategic Management Journal, 22(5), pp. 387–401.Google Scholar
Rivkin, J., & Fleming, L. (2004): “Complexity, Networks, and Knowledge Flow,” Research Policy, 33(10), pp. 1615–34.Google Scholar
Robbins, S. P. (1990): Organization Theory: Structure, Design and Applications, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Roberts, J. (2004): The Modern Firm: Organizational Design for Performance and Growth, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rynes, S. L., & Gerhart, B. (2000): Compensation in Organizations: Current Research and Practice, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Scott, W. R. (1998): Organizations, Rational, Natural and Open Systems, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Siggelkow, N., & Rivkin, J. (2005): “Speed and Search: Designing Organizations for Turbulence and Complexity,” Organization Science, 16(2), pp. 101–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinha, K. K., & Ven, A. (2005): “Design of Work Within and Between Organizations,” Organization Science, 16(4), pp. 389–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, A. (1904): An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sorenson, O., Rivkin, J., & Fleming, L. (2004): “Complexity, Networks, and Knowledge Flow,” Research Policy, 33(10), pp. 1615–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stinchcome, A. L. (1965): “Social Structure and Organizations,” in James, D.March, (ed.), Handbook of Organizations, Chicago: Rand McNally, pp. 142–93.Google Scholar
Tagiuri, R., & Litwin, G. H. (1968): Organizational Climate, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, J. D. (1967): Organizations in Action, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tushman, M. L., & Romanelli, E. (1985): “Organizational Evolution: A Metamorphosis Model of Convergence and Reorientation,” in Cunnings, L. L., & Stacer, B. M., (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, San Francisco: SAI Press, pp. 171–222.Google Scholar
Velstring, T., Rouse, T., & Rovit, S. (2004): “Integrate Where It Matters,” MIT Sloan Management Review, 46(1), pp. 15–18.Google Scholar
Venkatraman, N. (1989): “The Concept of Fit in Strategy Research: Towards a Verbal and Statistical Correspondence,” Academy of Management Review, 14(3), pp. 423–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, O. E. (1975): Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Woodward, J. (1965): Industrial Organization, Theory and Practice, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zammuto, R. F., & Krakower, J. Y. (1991): “Quantitative and Qualitative Studies in Organizational Culture,” Research in Organizational Change and Development, 5, pp. 83–114.Google Scholar
Zuboff, S. (1988): In the Age of the Smart Machine: The Future of Work and Power, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×