Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-rkxrd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T14:32:49.279Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

30 - Neuropsychology: recovery after brain lesions

from IX - Rehabilitation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2009

Michael Swash
Affiliation:
Royal London Hospital
Get access

Summary

This chapter will attempt to answer three questions: (1) what are the neuropsychological processes which may be involved in recovery of function following brain damage? (2) What are some of the courses of recovery following various types of brain damage? (3) Is there any evidence that neuropsychological rehabilitation can accelerate recovery?

What are the neuropsychological processes which may be involved in recovery of function following brain damage?

The cerebral cortex may show a greater degree of plasticity than has hitherto been recognized. Merzenich et al. (1984), for example, found that somatosensory fields in owl monkey altered in such a way as to apparently ‘use up’ space ‘Vacated’ by amputated fingers. Similarly, if the postcentral gyrus was damaged, they found a redistribution of receptive fields for other fingers so that they all ‘had a share’, albeit with less acuity because of having fewer representational neurons per finger. Jenkins et al. (1990) also demonstrated reorganization of the somatosensory fields after damage to somatosensory cortex in monkeys. Parts of the field which never before responded to specific fingers began to do so after the responsible areas were ablated. Also, simple, tactile training extensively altered the cortical maps. Many other studies have come to similar conclusions (e.g. Pons et al. 1991), but it is outwith the scope of the present chapter to review this literature in detail.

Animal studies also suggest that such plasticity can be influenced by post-damage experience (Gentile et al. 1978; Slavin et al. 1988), a finding with clearly important implications for human neurorehabilitation. Furthermore, Mayer et al. (1992) showed that rats given striatal neural transplants only benefited from the transplants when they were given the opportunity for learning.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×