Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T09:40:17.586Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Faces of the Tort Pyramid

Compensation, Regulation, and the Profession

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

John T. Nockleby
Affiliation:
Loyola Law School
Scott L. Cummings
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

To what extent does the efficacy of the tort system depend on the plaintiff's tort bar? In this chapter, I address how the regulatory function of the tort system is skewed by structural features of the legal profession.

The tort system serves at least two separate functions. First, it provides for compensation for a limited class of injured persons. Second, it serves to regulate safety. In addition to these two functions, the tort system reflects a particular moral view of responsibility for injury. For any of these roles to be served, the tort system requires significant lawyer energy. Although it is possible for nonrepresented plaintiffs to file suit, in fact most people do not sue without the aid of a lawyer. More to the point, few unrepresented plaintiffs are ever successful.

In this chapter, I ask how well the twin functions, as well as the moral sensibility, are served by looking at the role of lawyers in the tort system. My conclusion is that, on account of the peculiar way in which the legal profession intersects with the tort system, this system cannot adequately serve the functions presently assigned it. Before assessing the role of lawyers, it will be helpful to describe in general terms the compensatory function and the regulatory function of the present tort system.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Paradox of Professionalism
Lawyers and the Possibility of Justice
, pp. 90 - 106
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abel, Richard L., A Critique of American Tort Law, 8 British J. L. & Soc'y199 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abel, Richard L., A Socialist Approach to Risk, 41 Md. L. Rev. 695 (1982)Google Scholar
Abel, Richard L., Pound's of Cure, Ounces of Prevention, 73 Calif. L. Rev. 1003, 1023 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abel, Richard L., Should Tort Law Protect Property Against Accidental Loss?, 23 San Diego L. Rev. 79 (1986)Google Scholar
Galanter, Marc, Real World Torts: An Antidote to Anecdote, 55 Md. L. Rev. 1093, 1116–20 (1996)Google Scholar
Priest, George L., The Current Insurance System and Modern Tort Law, 96 Yale L.J. 1521, 1552–53 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hensler, Deborah R., Reading the Tort Litigation Tea Leaves: What's Going on in the Civil Liability Justice System?, 16 Just. Sys. J. 139, 140–41 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sugarman, Stephen D., Doing Away With Tort Law, 73 Cal. L. Rev. 555, 604 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenberg, Theodore, The Need for a National Civil Justice Survey of Incidence and Claiming behavior, 37 Fordham Urb. L.J. 17, 21 (2010)Google Scholar
Saks, Michael J., Do We Really Know Anything About the Behavior of the Tort Litigation System – and Why Not?, 140 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1147 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nockleby, John T., How to Manufacture a Crisis: Evaluating Empirical Claims Behind Tort Reform, 86 Or. L. Rev. 533 (2007)Google Scholar
Felstiner, William L.F. et al., The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes: Naming, Blaming, Claiming…, 15 Law & Soc'y Rev. 631 (1980–81)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kritzer, Herbert M. et al., The Aftermath of Injury: Cultural Factors in Compensation Seeking in Canada and the United States, 25 Law & Soc'y Rev. 499, 501–02 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cummings, Scott L., The Politics of Pro Bono, 52 UCLA L. Rev. 1 (2004)Google Scholar
Trautner, Mary Nell, Personal Responsibility v. Corporate Liability: Evaluating and Accepting Personal Injury Cases, 12 Sociology of Crime, Law & Deviance203 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galanter, Marc, The Turn Against Law: The Recoil Against Expanding Accountability, 81 Tex. L. Rev. 285, 287 (2002)Google Scholar
Finley, Lucinda, Female Trouble: The Implications of Tort Reform for Women, 64 Tenn. L. Rev. 847 (1997)Google Scholar
Finley, Lucinda, The Hidden Victims of Tort Reform: Women, Children, and the Elderly, 53 Emory L.J. 1263 (2004)Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×