Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- A note to the reader
- PART I INTRODUCTION
- 1 Hanoverian politics and the 1760s
- 2 Historiography and method
- PART II THE RECONFIGURATION OF POLITICS
- PART III AN ALTERNATIVE STRUCTURE OF POLITICS
- PART IV FOCUSSED RADICALISM
- PART V TWO POLITICAL NATIONS
- PART VI CONCLUSION
- Notes
- Bibliography
- Index
1 - Hanoverian politics and the 1760s
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 December 2009
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- A note to the reader
- PART I INTRODUCTION
- 1 Hanoverian politics and the 1760s
- 2 Historiography and method
- PART II THE RECONFIGURATION OF POLITICS
- PART III AN ALTERNATIVE STRUCTURE OF POLITICS
- PART IV FOCUSSED RADICALISM
- PART V TWO POLITICAL NATIONS
- PART VI CONCLUSION
- Notes
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
The people of Japan had been long divided between two inveterate parties known by the names of Shit-tilk-ums-heit, and She-it-kums-hi-til, the first signifying more fool than knave; and the other more knave than fool. Each had predominated in its turn, by securing a majority in the assemblies of the people; for the majority had always interest to force themselves into the administration: because the constitution being partly democratic, the Daire was still obliged to truckle to the prevailing faction. To obtain this majority, each side had employed every art of corruption, calumny, insinuation, and priestcraft; for nothing is such an effectual ferment in all popular commotions as religious fanaticism. No sooner one party accomplished its aim, than it reprobated the other, branding it with the epithets of traitors to their prince; while the minority retorted upon them the charge of corruption, rapaciousness, and abject servility. In short, both parties were equally abusive, rancorous, uncandid and illiberal. (Tobias Smollett, ‘The History and Adventures of an Atom’ in Smollett, Works (12 vols., 1901) XII, 374–5)
If we were bold enough to try to schematise eighteenth-century British politics we might well employ a threefold division of such a politically complex century. 1675 to 1725, as Professor Plumb has so ably argued, were the years which saw the emergence of the stable political order which most historians deem characteristic of eighteenthcentury politics.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 1976
- 1
- Cited by