Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-rvbq7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T00:38:54.088Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Application of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics and Signal Analysis to Drug Administration in Anaesthesia

from Section 1 - Basic Principles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 December 2019

By
R. Ross Kennedy
Edited by
Pedro L. Gambús  and
Jan F. A. Hendrickx
Pedro L. Gambús
Affiliation:
Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Spain
Jan F. A. Hendrickx
Affiliation:
Aalst General Hospital, Belgium
Get access

Summary

In a recent review of the performance of closed-loop systems in anaesthesia, Brogi et al [2] defined a closed-loop system as an automated control system designed to maintain a given variable around a desired set point. The key components of these systems, sensors, controllers and actuators, are outlined in Table 6.1.

Type
Chapter
Information
Personalized Anaesthesia
Targeting Physiological Systems for Optimal Effect
 , pp. 82 - 102
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Kuck, K, Johnson, KB: The three laws of autonomous and closed-loop systems in anesthesia. Anesth.Analg. 2017; 124 (2): 377–80.Google Scholar
Brogi, E, Cyr, S, Kazan, R, Giunta, F, Hemmerling, TM: Clinical performance and safety of closed-loop systems: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Anesth.Analg. 2016; 124 (2): 446–55.Google Scholar
Glass, PS: Anesthetic drug interactions: an insight into general anesthesia – its mechanism and dosing strategies. Anesthesiology. 1998; 88 (1): 5–6.Google Scholar
Rampil, IJ, King, BS: Volatile anesthetics depress spinal motor neurons. Anesthesiology. 1996; 85 (1): 129–34.Google Scholar
Sonner, JM, Antognini, JF, Dutton, RC, Flood, P, Gray, AT, Harris, RA, et al: Inhaled anesthetics and immobility: mechanisms, mysteries, and minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration. Anesth.Analg. 2003; 97 (3): 718–40.Google ScholarPubMed
Vuyk, J, Engbers, FH, Burm, AGL, Vletter, AA, Griever, GE, Olofsen, E, et al: Pharmacodynamic interaction between propofol and alfentanil when given for induction of anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 1996; 84 (2): 288–99.Google Scholar
Hendrickx, JFA, Eger, EI, Sonner, JM, Shafer, SL: Is synergy the rule? A review of anesthetic interactions producing hypnosis and immobility. Anesth.Analg. 2008; 107 (2): 494–506.Google Scholar
Krüger-Thiemer, E: Continuous intravenous infusion and multicompartment accumulation. Eur.J.Pharmacol. 1968; 4 (3): 317–24.Google Scholar
Hughes, MA, Glass, PS, Jacobs, JR: Context-sensitive half-time in multicompartment pharmacokinetic models for intravenous anesthetic drugs. Anesthesiology. 1992; 76 (3): 334–41.Google Scholar
Bailey, JM: Context-sensitive half-times and other decrement times of inhaled anesthetics. Anesth.Analg. 1997; 85 (3): 681–6.Google Scholar
Youngs, EJ, Shafer, SL: Pharmacokinetic parameters relevant to recovery from opioids. Anesthesiology. 1994; 81 (4): 833–42.Google Scholar
Eger, EI, Shafer, SL: Tutorial: context-sensitive decrement times for inhaled anesthetics. Anesth.Analg. 2005; 101 (3): 688–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frei, FJ, Zbinden, AM, Thomson, DA, Rieder, HU: Is the end-tidal partial pressure of isoflurane a good predictor of its arterial partial pressure? Br.J.Anaesth. 1991; 66 (3): 331–9.Google Scholar
Kennedy, RR, Minto, C, Seethepalli, A: Effect-site half-time for burst suppression is longer than for hypnosis during anaesthesia with sevoflurane. Br.J.Anaesth. 2008; 100 (1): 72–7.Google Scholar
Lerou, JGC, Mourisse, J: Applying a physiological model to quantify the delay between changes in end-expired concentrations of sevoflurane and bispectral index. Br.J.Anaesth. 2007; 99 (2): 226–36.Google Scholar
Absalom, AR, Mani, V, De Smet, T, Struys, MM: Pharmacokinetic models for propofol – defining and illuminating the devil in the detail. Br.J.Anaesth. 2009; 103 (1): 26–37.Google Scholar
Schnider, TW, Minto, CF, Gambus, PL, Andresen, C, Goodale, DB, Shafer, SL, et al: The influence of method of administration and covariates on the pharmacokinetics of propofol in adult volunteers. Anesthesiology. 1998; 88 (5): 1170–82.Google Scholar
Quasha, AL, Eger, EI, Tinker, JH: Determination and applications of MAC. Anesthesiology. 1980; 53 (4): 315–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaumann, DM, Mustaki, JP, Tassonyi, E: MAC-awake of isoflurane, enflurane and halothane evaluated by slow and fast alveolar washout. Br.J.Anaesth. 1992; 68 (1): 81–4.Google Scholar
Kimura, T, Watanabe, S, Asakura, N, Inomata, S, Okada, M, Taguchi, M: Determination of end-tidal sevoflurane concentration for tracheal intubation and minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration in adults. Anesth.Analg. 1994; 79 (2): 378–81.Google Scholar
Kennedy, RR: Effect-site estimation of volatile anaesthetic agents: Beyond MAC fractions as a target for anaesthesia delivery. Trends in Anaesthesia and Critical Care 2013; 3 (4): 211–15.Google Scholar
Roberts, FL, Dixon, J, Lewis, GT, Tackley, RM, Prys-Roberts, C: Induction and maintenance of propofol anaesthesia. A manual infusion scheme. Anaesthesia. 1988; 43 Suppl: 14–17.Google Scholar
Cowles, AL, Borgstedt, HH, Gillies, AJ: Digital computer prediction of the optimal anaesthetic inspired concentration. Br.J.Anaesth. 1972; 44: 420–5.Google Scholar
Mapleson, WW: The theoretical ideal fresh-gas flow sequence at the start of low-flow anaesthesia. Anaesthesia. 1998; 53 (3): 264–72.Google Scholar
Lowe, HJ, Ernst, EA: The Qualitative Practice of Anaesthesia: Use of Closed Circuit. Baltimore/London: Williams & Wilkins, 1981.Google Scholar
da Silva, JM, Mapleson, WW, Vickers, MD: Quantitative study of Lowe’s square-root-of-time method of closed-system anaesthesia. Br.J.Anaesth. 1997; 79 (1): 103–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bangaari, A, Panda, NB, Puri, GD: A simple method for evaluation of the uptake of isoflurane and its comparison with the square root of time model. Indian.J.Anaesth. 2013; 57 (3): 230–5.Google Scholar
Hendrickx, JF, Vandeput, DM, De Geyndt, AM, De Ridder, KP, Haenen, JS, Deloof, T, et al: Maintaining sevoflurane anesthesia during low-flow anesthesia using a single vaporizer setting change after overpressure induction. J.Clin.Anesth. 2000; 12 (4): 303–7.Google Scholar
Hendrickx, JFA, Dewulf, BBC, De Mey, N, Carette, R, Deloof, T, De Cooman, S, et al: Development and performance of a two-step desflurane-O(2)/N(2)O fresh gas flow sequence. J.Clin.Anesth. 2008; 20 (7): 501–7.Google Scholar
Van Zundert, T, Brebels, A, Hendrickx, J, Carette, R, De Cooman, S, Gatt, S, et al: Derivation and prospective testing of a two-step sevoflurane-O2-N2O low fresh gas flow sequence. Anaesth.Intens.Care. 2009; 37 (6): 911–17.Google Scholar
Albert, V, Mndolo, S, Harrison, EM, O’Sullivan, E, Wilson, IH, Walker, IA: Lifebox pulse oximeter implementation in Malawi: evaluation of educational outcomes and impact on oxygen desaturation episodes during anaesthesia. Anaesthesia. 2017; 72 (6): 686–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sykes, MK: Continuous monitoring of alveolar and inspiratory concentrations of anesthetic and respiratory gases is difficult and potentially unsafe. J.Clin.Monit. 1987; 3 (2): 116–22.Google Scholar
Fahy, BG, Chau, DF: The technology of processed electroencephalogram monitoring devices for assessment of depth of anesthesia. Anesth.Analg. 2017 3. doi:10.1213/ANE.0000000000002331. [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar
Absalom, AR, De Keyser, R, Struys, MMRF: Closed loop anesthesia: are we getting close to finding the holy grail? Anesth.Analg. 2011; 112 (3): 516–18.Google Scholar
Upton, HD, Ludbrook, GL, Wing, A, Sleigh, JW: Intraoperative analgesia nociception index guided fentanyl administration during sevoflurane anesthesia in lumbar discectomy and laminectomy. Anesth.Analg. 2017; 125 (1): 81–90.Google Scholar
Hannivoort, LN, Vereecke, HEM, Proost, JH, Heyse, BEK, Eleveld, DJ, Bouillon, TW, et al: Probability to tolerate laryngoscopy and noxious stimulation response index as general indicators of the anaesthetic potency of sevoflurane, propofol, and remifentanil. Br.J.Anaesth. 2016; 116 (5): 624–31.Google Scholar
Struys, MMRF, De Smet, T, Glen, JIB, Vereecke, HEM, Absalom, AR, Schnider, TW: The history of target-controlled infusion. Anesth.Analg. 2016; 122 (1): 56–69.Google Scholar
Glen, JB: The development of “Diprifusor”: a TCI system for propofol. Anaesthesia. 1998; 53 Suppl 1: 13–21.Google Scholar
Absalom, AR, Glen, JIB, Zwart, GJC, Schnider, TW, Struys, MMRF: Target-controlled infusion. Anesth.Analg. 2016; 122 (1): 70–8.Google Scholar
Varvel, J, Donoho, D, Shafer, S: Measuring the predictive performance of computer-controlled infusion pumps. J.Pharmacokinet.Biopharm. 1992; 20 (1): 63–94.Google Scholar
Shafer, SL, Egan, T: Target-controlled infusions. Anesth.Analg. 2016; 122 (1): 1–3.Google Scholar
Schnider, TW, Minto, CF, Struys, MMRF, Absalom, AR: The safety of target-controlled infusions. Anesth.Analg. 2016; 122 (1): 79–85.Google Scholar
Ross, JA, Wloch, RT, White, DC, Hawes, DW: Servo-controlled closed-circuit anaesthesia. A method for the automatic control of anaesthesia produced by a volatile agent in oxygen. Br.J.Anaesth. 1983; 55 (11): 1053–60.Google Scholar
O’Callaghan, AC, Hawes, DW, Ross, JA, White, DC, Wloch, RT: Uptake of isoflurane during clinical anaesthesia. Servo-control of liquid anaesthetic injection into a closed-circuit breathing system. Br.J.Anaesth. 1983; 55 (11): 1061–4.Google Scholar
Westenskow, DR, Zbinden, AM, Thomson, DA, Kohler, B: Control of end-tidal halothane concentration. Part A: anaesthesia breathing system and feedback control of gas delivery. Br.J.Anaesth. 1986; 58 (5): 555–62.Google Scholar
Zbinden, AM, Frei, F, Westenskow, DR, Thomson, DA: Control of end-tidal halothane concentration. Part B: verification in dogs. Br.J.Anaesth. 1986; 58 (5): 563–71.Google Scholar
Lortat-Jacob, B, Billard, V, Buschke, W, Servin, F: Assessing the clinical or pharmaco-economical benefit of target controlled desflurane delivery in surgical patients using the Zeus® anaesthesia machine. Anaesthesia. 2009; 64 (11): 1229–35.Google Scholar
Tay, S, Weinberg, L, Peyton, P, Story, D, Briedis, J: Financial and environmental costs of manual versus automated control of end-tidal gas concentrations. Anaesth.Intens.Care. 2013; 41 (1): 95–101.Google Scholar
Lucangelo, U, Garufi, G, Marras, E, Ferluga, M, Turchet, F, Bernabè, F, et al: End-tidal versus manually-controlled low-flow anaesthesia. J.Clin.Monit.Comput. 2014; 28 (2): 117–21.Google Scholar
Ryan, SM, Nielsen, CJ: Global warming potential of inhaled anesthetics: application to clinical use. Anesth.Analg. 2010; 111 (1): 92–8.Google Scholar
Sulbaek, Andersen MP, Sander, SP, Nielsen, OJ, Wagner, DS, Sanford, TJ, Wallington, TJ: Inhalation anaesthetics and climate change. Br.J.Anaesth. 2010; 105 (6): 760–6.Google Scholar
Kennedy, RR: New technology in anaesthesia: friend or foe? J.Clin.Monit.Comput. 2014; 28 (2): 113–16.Google Scholar
Carette, R, De Wolf, AM, Hendrickx, JFA: Automated gas control with the Maquet FLOW-i. J.Clin.Monit.Comput. 2016; 30 (3): 341–6.Google Scholar
Sieber, TJ, Frei, CW, Derighetti, M, Feigenwinter, P, Leibundgut, D, Zbinden, AM: Model-based automatic feedback control versus human control of end-tidal isoflurane concentration using low-flow anaesthesia. Br.J.Anaesth. 2000; 85 (6): 818–25.Google Scholar
Dussaussoy, C, Peres, M, Jaoul, V, Liu, N, Chazot, T, Picquet, J, et al: Automated titration of propofol and remifentanil decreases the anesthesiologist’s workload during vascular or thoracic surgery: a randomized prospective study. J.Clin.Monit.Comput. 2014; 28 (1): 35–40.Google Scholar
Franci, P, Bertamini, A, Bertamini, O, Pilla, T, Busetto, R: Clinical evaluation of an end-tidal target-controlled infusion closed-loop system for isoflurane administration in horses undergoing surgical procedures. Vet.J. 2012; 192 (2): 206–11.Google Scholar
Kennedy, RR, McKellow, MA, French, RA: The effect of predictive display on the control of step changes in effect site sevoflurane levels. Anaesthesia. 2010; 65 (8): 826–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kennedy, RR, French, RA: The development of a system to guide volatile anaesthetic administration. Anaesth.Intens.Care. 2011; 39 (2): 182–90.Google Scholar
Katoh, T, Uchiyama, T, Ikeda, K: Effect of fentanyl on awakening concentration of sevoflurane. Br.J.Anaesth. 1994; 73 (3): 322–5.Google Scholar
Katoh, T, Suguro, Y, Kimura, T, Ikeda, K: Morphine does not affect the awakening concentration of sevoflurane. Can.J.Anaesth. 1993; 40 (9): 825–8.Google Scholar
Gin, T: Clinical pharmacology on display. Anesth.Analg. 2010; 111 (2): 256–8.Google Scholar
Struys, MMRF, Sahinovic, M, Lichtenbelt, BJ, Vereecke, HEM, Absalom, AR: Optimizing intravenous drug administration by applying pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic concepts. Br.J.Anaesth. 2011; 107 (1): 38–47.Google Scholar
Kennedy, RR: Seeing the future of anesthesia drug dosing: moving the art of anesthesia from impressionism to realism. Anesth.Analg. 2010; 111 (2): 252–5.Google Scholar
van den Berg, JP, Vereecke, HEM, Proost, JH, Eleveld, DJ, Wietasch, JKG, Absalom, AR, et al: Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions in anaesthesia. A review of current knowledge and how it can be used to optimize anaesthetic drug administration. Br.J.Anaesth. 2017; 118 (1): 44–57.Google Scholar
DeCou, J, Johnson, K: An introduction to predictive modelling of drug concentration in anaesthesia monitors. Anaesthesia. 2017; 2;72: 58–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coppens, M, Van Limmen, JGM, Schnider, T, Wyler, B, Bonte, S, Dewaele, F, et al: Study of the time course of the clinical effect of propofol compared with the time course of the predicted effect-site concentration: Performance of three pharmacokinetic-dynamic models. Br.J.Anaesth. 2010; 104 (4): 452–8.Google Scholar
Cirillo, V, Zito Marinosci, G, De Robertis, E, Iacono, C, Romano, GM, Desantis, O, et al: Navigator® and SmartPilot® View are helpful in guiding anesthesia and reducing anesthetic drug dosing. Minerva.Anestesiol. 2015 19; 81 (11): 1163–9.Google Scholar
Short, TG, Hannam, JA, Laurent, S, Campbell, D, Misur, M, Merry, AF, et al: Refining target-controlled infusion. Anesth.Analg. 2016; 122 (1): 90–7.Google Scholar
O’Hara, DA, Bogen, DK, Noordergraaf, A: The use of computers for controlling the delivery of anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 1992; 77 (3): 563–81.Google Scholar
Mayo, CW, Bickford, RG, Faulconer, A: Electroencephalographically controlled anesthesia in abdominal surgery. J.Am.Med.Assoc. 1950 25; 144 (13): 1081–3.Google Scholar
Hull, CJ, Van Beem, HB, McLeod, K, Sibbald, A, Watson, MJ: A pharmacodynamic model for pancuronium. Br.J.Anaesth. 1978; 50 (11): 1113–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stanski, DR, Ham, J, Miller, RD, Sheiner, LB: Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of d-tubocurarine during nitrous oxide-narcotic and halothane anesthesia in man. Anesthesiology. 1979; 51 (3): 235–41.Google Scholar
Cass, NM, Lampard, DG, Brown, WA, Coles, JR: Computer controlled muscle relaxation: a comparison of four muscle relaxants in the sheep. Anaesth.Intens.Care. 1976; 4 (1): 16–22.Google Scholar
Lampard, DG, Brown, WA, Cass, NM, Ng, KC: Computer-controlled muscle paralysis with atracurium in the sheep. Anaesth.Intens.Care. 1986 Feb; 14 (1): 7–11.Google Scholar
Murchie, CJ, Kenny, GN: Comparison among manual, computer-assisted, and closed-loop control of blood pressure after cardiac surgery. J.Cardiothorac.Anesth. 1989; 3 (1): 16–19.Google Scholar
Monk, CR, Millard, RK, Hutton, P, Prys-Roberts, C: Automatic arterial pressure regulation using isoflurane: comparison with manual control. Br.J.Anaesth. 1989; 63 (1): 22–30.Google Scholar
Mitchell, RR: The need for closed-loop therapy. Crit. Care.Med. 1982; 10 (12): 831–4.Google Scholar
Schwilden, H, Schuttler, J, Stoeckel, H: Closed-loop feedback control of methohexital anesthesia by quantitative EEG analysis in humans. Anesthesiology. 1987; 67 (3): 341–7.Google Scholar
Schwilden, H, Stoeckel, H, Schuttler, J. Closed-loop feedback control of propofol anaesthesia by quantitative EEG analysis in humans. Br.J.Anaesth. 1989; 62 (3): 290–6.Google Scholar
Mortier, E, Struys, M, De Smet, T, Versichelen, L, Rolly, G: Closed-loop controlled administration of propofol using bispectral analysis. Anaesthesia. 1998; 53 (8): 749–54.Google Scholar
Kenny, GN, Mantzaridis, H: Closed-loop control of propofol anaesthesia. Br.J.Anaesth. 1999; 83 (2): 223–8.Google Scholar
Morley, A, Derrick, J, Mainland, P, Lee, BB, Short, TG: Closed loop control of anaesthesia: an assessment of the bispectral index as the target of control. Anaesthesia. 2000; 55 (10): 953–9.Google Scholar
Struys, MM, De Smet, T, Versichelen, LF, Van De Velde, S, Van den Broecke, R, Mortier, EP: Comparison of closed-loop controlled administration of propofol using bispectral index as the controlled variable versus “standard practice” controlled administration. Anesthesiology. 2001; 95 (1): 6–17.Google Scholar
Struys, MMRF, De Smet, T, Greenwald, S, Absalom, AR, Bingé, S, Mortier, EP: Performance evaluation of two published closed-loop control systems using bispectral index monitoring: a simulation study. Anesthesiology. 2004; 100 (3): 640–7.Google Scholar
Locher, S, Stadler, KS, Boehlen, T, Bouillon, T, Leibundgut, D, Schumacher, PM, et al: A new closed-loop control system for isoflurane using bispectral index outperforms manual control. Anesthesiology. 2004; 101 (3): 591–602.Google Scholar
Luginbühl, M, Bieniok, C, Leibundgut, D, Wymann, R, Gentilini, A, Schnider, TW: Closed-loop control of mean arterial blood pressure during surgery with alfentanil: clinical evaluation of a novel model-based predictive controller. Anesthesiology. 2006; 105 (3): 462–70.Google Scholar
West, N, Dumont, GA, van Heusden, K, Petersen, CL, Khosravi, S, Soltesz, K, et al: Robust closed-loop control of induction and maintenance of propofol anesthesia in children. Paediatr.Anaesth. 2013; 23 (8): 712–19.Google Scholar
Liu, N, Chazot, T, Hamada, S, Landais, A, Boichut, N, Dussaussoy, C, et al: Closed-loop coadministration of propofol and remifentanil guided by bispectral index: a randomized multicenter study. Anesth.Analg. 2011; 112 (3): 546–57.Google Scholar
Puri, GD, Mathew, PJ, Biswas, I, Dutta, A, Sood, J, Gombar, S, et al: A multicenter evaluation of a closed-loop anesthesia delivery system: a randomized controlled trial. Anesth.Analg. 2016; 122 (1): 106–14.Google Scholar
Hemmerling, TM, Arbeid, E, Wehbe, M, Cyr, S, Taddei, R, Zaouter, C: Evaluation of a novel closed-loop total intravenous anaesthesia drug delivery system: a randomized controlled trial. BJA. 2013; 110 (6): 1031–9.Google Scholar
Wehbe, M, Arbeid, E, Cyr, S, Mathieu, PA, Taddei, R, Morse, J, et al: A technical description of a novel pharmacological anesthesia robot. J.Clin.Monit.Comput. 2014; 28 (1): 27–34.Google Scholar
Pasin, L, Nardelli, P, Pintaudi, M, Greco, M, Zambon, M, Cabrini, L, et al: Closed-loop delivery systems versus manually controlled administration of total IV anesthesia. Anesth.Analg. 2017; 124 (2): 456–64.Google Scholar
Zaouter, C, Hemmerling, TM, Lanchon, R, Valoti, E, Remy, A, Leuillet, S, et al: The feasibility of a completely automated total IV anesthesia drug delivery system for cardiac surgery. Anesth.Analg. 2016; 123 (4): 885–93.Google Scholar
Biswas, I, Mathew, PJ, Singh, RS, Puri, GD: Evaluation of closed-loop anesthesia delivery for propofol anesthesia in pediatric cardiac surgery. Paediatr.Anaesth. 2013; 23 (12): 1145–52.Google Scholar
Zaouter, C, Hemmerling, TM, Mion, S, Leroux, L, Remy, A, Ouattara, A: Feasibility of automated propofol sedation for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a pilot study. Anesth.Analg. 2017 Nov; 125 (5): 1505–12Google Scholar
Kennedy, RR: Lessons from drug interaction displays. In Absalom AR & Mason KP (eds), Total Intravenous Anesthesia and Target Controlled Infusions. Springer 2017.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×