Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-fwgfc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T16:11:53.206Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - The Nash Solution to the Bargaining Problem

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Gordon C. Rausser
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Johan Swinnen
Affiliation:
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Policy formation is a process of political interaction among individuals and groups. Because participants in the political process may not have identical interests, their divergent political preferences make conflicts unavoidable. However, such conflicts are often resolved in the policy formulation process, with the emerging policies reflecting both the participants' policy preferences and their political power. This is the essence of the political power theory of policy formation. Presuming that interactions emerge through bargaining and negotiations among participants, the following major questions arise: What aspect of political interaction gives rise to observed economic policy? How are the political conflicts resolved? How can this process be modeled?

Among the various approaches to the solution of this inherent bargaining problem, the Nash/Harsanyi (NH) conceptualization provides an internally consistent framework. Along with the strong theoretical foundations of the NH theory, it is also a convenient analytical model. The theoretical foundation for this framework is the basis of Harsanyi's (1962a, 1962b) model of social power. As this particular bargaining theory is widely employed in this book, the present chapter is dedicated to the introduction and exposition of the NH theory.

Nash's axiomatic solution to the two-person bargaining problem, given fixed disagreement payoffs, represents the core of the bargaining framework presented in this chapter. In Chapter 3,we will analyze the problem of mutually optimal threat strategies that the two parties may select in order to influence disagreement payoffs and, indirectly, the bargaining outcome.

Type
Chapter
Information
Political Power and Economic Policy
Theory, Analysis, and Empirical Applications
, pp. 30 - 49
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×