Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-s9k8s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-13T18:17:09.945Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Representative Government and Universal Franchise

from PART II - Practice in Sri Lanka

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 October 2011

Rajiva Wijesinha
Affiliation:
Professor of Language, Sabaramagua University
Get access

Summary

Donoughmore Constitution and its Shortcomings

The main grievance of Ceylonese politicians with regard to the Manning-Devonshire Constitution was that while the Legislative Council, in theory, had authority over the government through its financial and legislative powers, it had no executive powers. The two representatives in the Executive Council, without responsibility for any specific area, could not really influence governmental action.

In response to these grievances, Britain sent another commission at the end of the 1920s to draw up a new constitution. In those years, Britain's Labour Prime Minister, Ramsay MacDonald, along with at least some members of the cabinet and parliament, was keen on reforms in the colonies. The Donoughmore Constitution, as it was known after the Chairman of the Commission, Lord Donoughmore, moved in radical new directions. It introduced Universal Suffrage, which was opposed by most Sri Lankan politicians. Among them were Ponnambalam Ramanathan, James Pieris, E. W. Perera, D. B. Jayatilaka, D. S. Senanayake and S. W. R. D. Bandaranaike. Only two minor politicians, one of whom was the Labour Party leader, A. E. Goonesinha, spoke in its favour.

The other major change of the Donoughmore Constitution was the amalgamation of legislative and executive functions by the creation of a State Council. Through the State Council ministers were appointed to take charge of the executive departments of the government. However, unlike in the cabinet system in Britain, these ministers were not chosen from the ruling party. In fact, though candidates described themselves as members of parties (Congress, Liberal or Labour), they stood as individuals.

Instead of forming into party blocs, members of the State Council divided themselves into seven committees, with responsibility for specific areas of government.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Foundation Books
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×