Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T12:01:39.202Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Bargained globalization: employment relations providing robust “tool kits” for socio-political strategizing in MNCs in Germany

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2011

Karen Williams
Affiliation:
Swansea University, Wales
Mike Geppert
Affiliation:
University of Surrey, UK
Christoph Dörrenbächer
Affiliation:
Berlin School of Economics and Law
Mike Geppert
Affiliation:
University of Surrey
Get access

Summary

Germany has somehow managed to create a high-wage, unionized economy without shipping all its jobs abroad or creating a massive trade deficit, or any deficit at all … Why is Germany beating us?

(Geoghegan 2010: 7)

Introduction

The above quote appeared in a recent edition of Harper's Magazine in the USA and raises some interesting questions by contrasting distinctive management and employment practices in the German manufacturing sector with current dilemmas faced by firms situated in and originating from liberal market economies in the wake of the recent financial crisis. In this chapter we seek to explain why these distinctive practices remain robust in the face of pressures from globalization, based on a survey of some of the current literature on plant-level employment relations in Germany. Our survey focuses on the important role played by local managers and workers' representatives as socio-political strategists, who are able to draw on critical power resources within multinational companies (MNCs) operating in Germany to safeguard skills and jobs in German plants.

In the first part of the chapter we reflect on ideas that stress the importance of local institutions and the role of local actors for institution building in transnational social spaces, referring to the idea of the MNC as a “contested terrain” (Edwards and Bélanger 2009; see also chapter of Morgan in this volume). We look at emerging opportunities for socio-political strategizing by local actors in Germany and link these to institutional resources provided by the German model of employment relations, which provide local actors with critical resources.

Type
Chapter
Information
Politics and Power in the Multinational Corporation
The Role of Institutions, Interests and Identities
, pp. 72 - 100
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Almond, P. and Ferner, A. (eds.) 2006. American Multinationals in Europe. Managing Employment Relations in Europe. Oxford University Press
Andersson, U. and Holm, U. (eds.) 2010. Managing the Contemporary Multinational: The Role of Headquarters. Cheltenham: Edward ElgarCrossRef
Bartlett, C. A. and Ghoshal, S. (1989). Managing Across Borders: The Transnational Solution. London: Century BusinessGoogle Scholar
Becker-Ritterspach, F. and Dörrenbächer, C. 2011. “An organizational politics perspective on intrafirm competition in multinational corporations,” Management International Review (in print)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bélanger, J., C. Berggren, T. Björkman and C. Köhler (eds.) 1999. Being Local Worldwide – ABB and the Challenge of Global Management. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University PressGoogle Scholar
Bélanger, J., Harvey, P.-A., Jalette, P., Levesque, C. and Murray, G. 2006. Employment Practices in Multinational Companies in Canada: Building Organizational Capabilities and Institutions for Innovation. Interuniversity Research Centre on Globalization and Work, University of Montreal.Google Scholar
Berghahn, V. R. and Vitols, S. 2006. Gibt es einen Deutschen Kapitalismus?: Tradition und Globale Perspektiven der Sozialen Marktwirtschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Campus VerlagGoogle Scholar
Berggren, C. and Köhler, C. 1999. “Global policies and the dynamics of local variation” in Bélanger, , Berggren, and Björkman, (eds.), pp. 198–216
Birkinshaw, J. M. 2000. Entrepreneurship in the Global Firm, London, SageGoogle Scholar
Blazejewski, S. 2009. “Actors' interests and local contexts in intrafirm conflict: the 2004 GM and Opel crisis,” Competition and Change 13: 229–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bluhm, K. 2003. “Dealing with the regulation gap: labor relations in Polish and Czech subsidiaries of German companies.” Paper for the 13th World Congress of the IIRA in Berlin, September
Bouquet, C. and Birkinshaw, J. 2008. “Managing power in the multinational corporation: how low-power actors gain influence,” Journal of Management 34: 477–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Child, J 1997. “Strategic choice in the analysis of action, structure, organizations and environment: retrospect and prospect,” Organization Studies 18: 43–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delaney, J. T. and J. Godard 2001. “An industrial relations perspective on the high performance paradigm,” Human Resource Management Review 11: 395–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Djelic, M.-L. and Quack, S. (eds.) 2003. Globalization and Institutions. Cheltenham: Edward ElgarCrossRef
Doellgast, V. and Greer, I. 2007. “Vertical disintegration and the disorganization of German industrial relations,” British Journal of Industrial Relations 45: 55–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dörrenbächer, C. 2004. “Fleeing or exporting the German model? The internationalization of German multinationals in the 1990s,” Competition and Change 8: 443–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dörrenbächer, C. and Gammelgaard, J. 2010. “Multinational corporations, inter-organizational networks and subsidiary charter removals,” Journal of World Business 45: 206–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dörrenbächer, C. and Geppert, M. 2009. “A micro-political perspective on subsidiary initiative-taking: evidence from German-owned subsidiaries in France,” European Management Journal 27: 100–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, P. and Bélanger, J. 2009. “The multinational firm as a contested space” in Collinson, and Morgan, (eds.) Images of the Multinational Firm. Chichester: Wiley, pp. 193–216Google Scholar
Edwards, T., Coller, X., Ortiz, L., Rees, C. and Wortmann, M. 2006. “National industrial relations systems and cross-border restructuring: evidence from a merger in the pharmaceuticals sector,” European Journal of Industrial Relations 12: 69–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, P., Edwards, T., Ferner, A., Marginson, P. and Tregaskis, O. 2007. “Employment practices of MNCs in organisational context: a large-scale survey: report of the main survey.” King's College University of London, June
Ferner, A. and Quintanilla, J. 1998. “Multinationals, national identity and the management of HRM: ‘Anglo-Saxonisation’ and its limits,” International Journal of Human Resource Managament (Special Issue) 9: 710–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferner, A., Quintanilla, J. and Varul, M. Z. 2000. “Country of origin effects, host country effects and the management of human resources in multinationals: German companies in Britain and Spain,” Journal of World Business 36: 107–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frege, C. M. 2002. “A critical assessment on the theoretical and empirical research on German works councils,” British Journal of Industrial Relations 40: 221–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frege, C. M. 2003. “Transforming German workplace relations: quo vadis cooperation?,” Economic and Industrial Democracy 24: 317–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geoghegan, T. 2010. “Consider the Germans,” Harper's Magazine, March, pp. 7–9
Geppert, M. and Clark, E. 2003. “Knowledge and learning in transnational ventures: an actor-centred approach,” Management Decision 41: 433–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geppert, M. and Saka-Helmhout, A. 2007. “Organisational learning within MNCs: the role of institutions and actors' orientations.” Paper for 23rd EGOS Colloquium, Sub-theme 44: Unravelling organisational learning in MNCs, Vienna
Geppert, M. and Williams, K. 2006. “Global, national and local practices in multinational corporations: towards a socio-political framework,” International Journal of Human Resource Management 17: 49–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geppert, M., Williams, K. and Matten, D. 2003. “The social construction of contextual rationalities in MNCs: an Anglo-German comparison of subsidiary choice,” Journal of Management Studies 40: 617–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godard, J. 2002. “Institutional environment, employer practices, and states in liberal market economies,” Industrial Relations 41: 249–86Google Scholar
Gospel, H. and Pendleton, A. 2003. “Finance, corporate governance and the management of labour: a conceptual and comparative analysis,” British Journal of Industrial Relations 41: 557–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grahl, J. and Teague, P. 2004. “The German model in danger,” Industrial Relations Journal 35: 557–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greer, I. 2008. “Organised industrial relations in the information economy: the German automotive sector as a test case,” New Technology, Work and Employment 23: 181–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greer, I and Hauptmeier, M. 2008. “Political entrepreneurs and co-managers: labour transnationalism at four multinational auto companies,” British Journal of Industrial Relations 45: 76–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, P. and Soskice, D. 2001. Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hassel, A. and Beyer, J. 2001. “The effects of convergence: internationalization and the changing distribution of net value added in large German firms.” MPfG Discussion Paper, July 1, Max Planck Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung, Cologne
Höpner, M. 2005a. “What connects industrial relations and corporate governance? Explaining institutional complementarity,” Socio-Economic Review 3: 331–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Höpner, M. 2005b. What Connects Industrial Relations and Corporate Governance? Explaining Institutional Complementarity. Cologne: Max-Planck-Institute for the Study of SocietiesGoogle Scholar
Hyman, R. and Ferner, A. 1998. Changing Systems of Industrial Relations in Europe. Oxford: Blackwell PublishersGoogle Scholar
Jürgens, U. 2004. “An elusive model-diversified quality production and the transformation of the German automobile industry,” Competition and Change 8: 411–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kädtler, J. and Sperling, H.-J. 2002. “After globalization and financialisation: logics of bargaining in the German automotive industry,” Competition and Change 6: 149–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitschelt, H. and Streeck, W. 2004. “From stability to stagnation: Germany at the beginning of the 21st century” in Kitschelt, and Streeck, (eds.) Germany: Beyond the Stable State. London: Frank Cass & Co, pp. 1–34Google Scholar
Kristensen, P. H. and Morgan, G. 2007. “Multinationals and institutional competitiveness.” Regulation & Governance 1: 197–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kristensen, P. and Zeitlin, J. 2005. Local Players in Global Games. Oxford University Press
Lane, C. 2006. “Institutional transformation and system change: changes in corporate governance of German corporations” in Morgan, , Whitley, and Moen, (eds.) Changing Capitalisms? Internationalization, Institutional Change, and Systems of Economic Organization. Oxford University Press, pp. 78–109Google Scholar
Morgan, G. 2001. “The multinational firm: organizing across institutional and national divides” in Morgan, , Kristensen, and Whitley, (eds.) The Multinational Firm. Oxford University Press, pp. 1–24Google Scholar
Morgan, G. and Kristensen, P. H. 2006. “The contested space of multinationals: varieties of institutionalism, varieties of capitalism,” Human Relations 59: 1467–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nohria, N. and Ghoshal, S. 1997. The Differentiated Network: Organizing Multinational Corporations for Value Creation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-BassGoogle Scholar
Noorderhaven, N. G. and Harzing, A. W. K. 2003. “The ‘country-of-origin effect’ in multinational corporations: sources mechanisms and moderating conditions,” Management International Review 43: 47–66Google Scholar
Oliver, C. and Holzinger, I. 2008. “The effectiveness of strategic political management: a dynamic capabilities framework,”Academy of Management Review 33: 496–520Google Scholar
Pries, L. 1999. Auf dem Weg zu global operierenden Konzernen? BMW, Daimler-Benz und Volkswagen -Die Drei Großen der deutschen Automobilindustrie. München/Mering: Rainer Hampp VerlagGoogle Scholar
Raess, D. and Burgoon, B. 2006. “The dogs that sometimes bark: globalization and works council bargaining in Germany,” European Journal of Industrial Relations 12: 287–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Royle, T. 2002. “Resistance is useless! The problem of trade union organization in the European fast-food industry: the case of McDonald's” in Geppert, , Matten, and Williams, (eds.) Challenges for European Management in a Global Context. Palgrave: BasingstokeGoogle Scholar
Royle, T. 2004. “Employment practices of multinationals in the Spanish and German quick food sectors: low road convergence?,” European Journal of Industrial Relations 10: 51–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rugman, A. and Hodgetts, R. 2001. “The end of global strategy,” European Management Journal 19: 333–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schroeder, W. and Weinert, R. 2003. “Zwischen Verbetrieblichung und Europaisierung. Oder ‘Can the German model survive’?,” Industrielle Beziehungen 10: 97–117Google Scholar
Schultz-Wild, R. 1999. “ABB in Germany: is excellence enough to survive?” in Bélanger, Berggren, Björkman and Köhler (eds.) Being Local Worldwide – ABB and the Challenge of Global Management. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, pp. 179–197Google Scholar
Scott, R. 2001. Institutions and Organizations. 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: SageGoogle Scholar
Sorge, A. 2004. “Cross-national differences in human resources and organization” in Harzing, and Ruysseveldt, (eds.) International Human Resource Management. 2nd edn. Sage: London, pp. 117–140Google Scholar
Sorge, A. 2005. The Global and the Local: Understanding the Dialectics of Business Systems. Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Streeck, W. 1996. “Lean production in the German automobile industry” in Berger, and Dore, (eds.) National Diversity and Global Capitalism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, pp. 138–70Google Scholar
Streeck, W. 2009. Re-forming Capitalism: Institutional Change in the German Political Economy. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Streeck, W. and Kathleen, T. (eds.) 2005. Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies. Oxford University Press
Swidler, A. 1986. “Culture in action: symbols and strategies,” American Sociological Review 51: 273–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Times 2009. “Sleek, stylish Karmann Ghia has run into trouble”, March 9, 2009
Turner, L. 2009. “Institutions and activism: crisis and opportunity for German labor movement in decline,” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 62: 292–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tüselmann, H.-J., McDonald, F. and Heise, A. 2003. “Employee relations in German multinationals in an Anglo-Saxon setting: toward a Germanic version of the Anglo-Saxon approach,” European Journal of Industrial Relations 9: 327–49Google Scholar
Vitols, S. 2004a. “Reforming the German labour market: the case of temporary agency work,” Competition and Change 8: 375–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vitols, S. 2004b. “Negotiated shareholder value: the German variant of an Anglo-American practice,” Competition and Change 8: 357–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westney, E. D. 2009. “The multinational firm as an evolutionary system” in Collinson, and Morgan, (eds.) Images of the Multinational Firm. Chichester: Wiley, pp. 117–144Google Scholar
Whitley, R. 1999. Divergent Capitalisms. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Wortmann, M. 2004. “Aldi and the German model: structural change in German grocery retailing and the success of grocery discounters,” Competition and Change 8: 425–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeller, C. 2000. “Rescaling power relations between trade unions and corporate management in a globalizing pharmaceutical industry: the case of the acquisition of Boehringer Mannheim by Hoffman-La Roche,” Environment and Planning 32: 1545–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×