Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-pwrkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-12T03:17:46.327Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Commentary

from Section III - Non-convex Uniform Polyhedra

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2015

Get access

Summary

You have now seen the stellation process applied to the Platonic solids and two of the Archimedean solids. You have also seen that it leads to very few uniform polyhedra. In fact only the three dodecahedral stellations and one icosahedral stellation turn out to be uniform. You may recall that a polyhedron is uniform if all its faces are regular polygons (these now include the regular stars) and all its vertices are alike. The list so far contains the five Platonic solids, the thirteen Archimedean solids and the four Kepler-Poinsot solids. Are there any more uniform polyhedra? It may surprise you to learn that there are at least fifty-three more! How were they ever discovered? Thirty-seven of them are due to Badoureau (1881) who systematically considered each of the Platonic and Archimedean solids in turn with a view to finding regular polygons or regular stars on their facial planes or cutting through the interior of these solids. This is a different approach from that of stellation. If such a polygon is found, it is evident that its vertices coincide with some of the vertices of the related convex polyhedron. The planes of these polygons may intersect. If portions of the solid are removed symmetrically, another uniform polyhedron may result. This process is called faceting, a sort of reverse of stellating. Stellating implies the addition of cells to a basic polyhedron which serves as a core. Faceting implies the removal of cells, so that the basic polyhedron may still be imagined as a case or enclosing web for the new one. If you examine Kepler–Poinsot solids from this point of view you will see that the small stellated dodecahedron and the great dodecahedron can both be derived by faceting an icosahedron. The vertices of the former and the edges of the latter coincide respectively with the vertices and edges of an icosahedron imagined as a case enclosing them. If you examine the models you will see this very plainly.

Type
Chapter
Information
Polyhedron Models , pp. 98 - 99
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Commentary
  • Magnus J. Wenninger
  • Book: Polyhedron Models
  • Online publication: 05 August 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511569746.018
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Commentary
  • Magnus J. Wenninger
  • Book: Polyhedron Models
  • Online publication: 05 August 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511569746.018
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Commentary
  • Magnus J. Wenninger
  • Book: Polyhedron Models
  • Online publication: 05 August 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511569746.018
Available formats
×