Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m42fx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T10:25:46.088Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Empirical Research Strategy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Herbert Kitschelt
Affiliation:
Duke University, North Carolina
Zdenka Mansfeldova
Affiliation:
Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague
Gabor Toka
Affiliation:
Central European University, Budapest
Get access

Summary

Our principal research tool is a survey among politicians of just about all electorally relevant parties in Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Hungary, and Poland. We conducted the pilot study with politicians at the national level (legislators, party executives, and secretaries) throughout 1993. Our main study in winter–spring 1994 targeted middle-level politicians and party functionaries in four regions of each country. The time points of pilot and main study are sufficiently close to each other to let them serve as mutual validity checks for each other. Future research should multiply the time points of observation and increase the intervals between each measurement in order to capture dynamic change in the party systems. We supplement our elite study by population survey data to explore the correspondence of elite and voter positions and perceptions of the political landscape. In this chapter we explain the design of our empirical instrument and introduce technicalities of the elite survey analysis.

SURVEYING EXPERTS OR POLITICAL ELITES

Studies of party elites are rather uncommon in the empirical literature on party competition and they have proceeded along two different avenues. On the one hand, researchers have surveyed party politicians, such as convention delegates, candidates for legislative office, or legislators, and compared their policy positions with those of their voters. On the other, political scientists have asked panels of academic experts on individual countries or entire regions to rate party positions on a left-right scale (e.g., Castles and Mair 1984).

Type
Chapter
Information
Post-Communist Party Systems
Competition, Representation, and Inter-Party Cooperation
, pp. 133 - 154
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×