Book contents
- Postgraduate Orthopaedics
- Postgraduate Orthopaedics
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Preface to third edition
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Interactive website
- Section 1 The FRCS (Tr & Orth) examination
- Section 2 The written paper
- Section 3 The clinicals
- Section 4 The general orthopaedics and pathology oral
- Section 5 The hand and upper limb oral
- Section 6 The paediatric oral
- Section 7 The trauma oral
- Chapter 26 General principles, spine and pelvis
- Chapter 27 Upper limb trauma oral core topics
- Chapter 28 Lower limb trauma oral topics
- Chapter 29 Applied trauma oral topics
- Section 8 The basic science oral
- Section 9 Miscellaneous topics
- Index
- References
Chapter 26 - General principles, spine and pelvis
from Section 7 - The trauma oral
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 January 2017
Book contents
- Postgraduate Orthopaedics
- Postgraduate Orthopaedics
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Preface to third edition
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Interactive website
- Section 1 The FRCS (Tr & Orth) examination
- Section 2 The written paper
- Section 3 The clinicals
- Section 4 The general orthopaedics and pathology oral
- Section 5 The hand and upper limb oral
- Section 6 The paediatric oral
- Section 7 The trauma oral
- Chapter 26 General principles, spine and pelvis
- Chapter 27 Upper limb trauma oral core topics
- Chapter 28 Lower limb trauma oral topics
- Chapter 29 Applied trauma oral topics
- Section 8 The basic science oral
- Section 9 Miscellaneous topics
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Postgraduate OrthopaedicsThe Candidate's Guide to the FRCS (Tr & Orth) Examination, pp. 583 - 609Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Anderson, LD, D'Alonzo, RT. Fractures of the odontoid process of the axis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1974;56:1663–74.Google Scholar
Denis, F. The three column spine and its significance in the classification of acute thoracolumbar spinal injuries. Spine. 1983;8:817–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
References
Kilner, T. Triage decisions of prehospital emergency health care providers, using a multiple casualty scenario paper exercise. Emerg Med J. 2002;19:348–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moran, CG, Forward, DP. The early management of patients with multiple injuries. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012;94B:446–53.Google Scholar
Ker, K, Kiriya, J, Perel, P, et al. Avoidable mortality from giving tranexamic acid to bleeding trauma patients: An estimation based on WHO mortality data, a systematic literature review and data from the CRASH-2 trial. BMC Emerg Med. 2012;12:3.Google Scholar
Morrison, JJ, Dubose, JJ, Rasmussen, TE, Midwinte, MJ. Military application of tranexamic acid in trauma emergency resuscitation (MATTERs) Study Arch Surg. 2012;147:113–19.Google Scholar
Cothren, CC, Osborn, PM, Moore, EE, et al. Preperitonal pelvic packing for hemodynamically unstable pelvic fractures: A paradigm shift. J Trauma. 2007;62:834–9; discussion 839–42.Google Scholar
Cullinane, DC, Schiller, HJ, Zielinski, MD, et al. Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma practice management guidelines for hemorrhage in pelvic fracture – update and systematic review. J Trauma. 2011;71:1850–68.Google Scholar
O'Toole, RV, O'Brien, M, Scalea, TM, et al. Resuscitation before stabilisation of femoral fractures limits acute respiratory distress syndrome in patients with multiple traumatic injuries despite low use of damage control orthopedics. J Trauma. 2009;67:1013–21.Google Scholar
Costa, ML, Achten, J, Parsons, NR, et al. Percutaneous fixation with Kirschner wires versus volar locking plate fixation in adults with dorsally displaced fracture of distal radius: Randomised controlled trial BMJ. 2014;349:g4807.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burgess, AR, Eastridge, BJ, Young, JW, et al. Pelvic ring disruptions: Effective classification system and treatment protocols. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 1990;30:848–56.Google Scholar
Tile, M. Pelvic ring fractures: Should they be fixed? J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1988;70:1–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, LA, Ollivere, BJ, Hahn, DM, Forward, DP. Pelvic infix. A new technique for the stabilisation of pelvic ring fractures. A case matched comparative series. Injury Extra. 2012;43:10.Google Scholar
Duke, MD, Guidry, C, Guice, J, et al. Restrictive fluid resuscitation in combination with damage control resuscitation. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;73:674–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sayad, El M, Noureddine, H. Recent advances of hemorrhage management in severe trauma. Emerg Med Int. 2014; 2014:638956.Google Scholar
Holdsworth, F. Fractures, dislocations, and fracture–dislocations of the spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1970;52:1534–51.Google Scholar
Allen, BL, Ferguson, RL, Lehmann, TR, O’Brien, RP. A mechanistic classification of closed, indirect fractures and dislocations of the lower cervical spine. Spine. 1982;7:1–27.Google Scholar
Harris, JH, Edeiken-Monroe, B, Kopaniky, DR. A practical classification of acute cervical spine injuries. Orthop Clin N Am. 1986;17:15–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vaccaro, AR, Hulbert, RJ, Patel, A, et al. The subaxial cervical spine injury classification system: A novel approach to recognise the importance of morphology, neurology, and integrity of the disco-ligamentous complex. Spine. 2007;32:2365–7.Google Scholar
Moore, T, Vaccaro, AR, Anderson, P. Classification of lower cervical spine injuries. Spine. 2006;31(Suppl):S37–43; discussion S61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holdsworth, FW. Fractures, dislocations and fracture–dislocations of the spine. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1963;45B:6–20.Google Scholar
Nicoll, EA. Fractures of the dorso-lumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1949;31:376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magerl, F, Aebi, M, Gertzbein, SD, et al. A comprehensive classification of thoracic and lumbar injuries. Euro Spine J. 1994;3:184–201.Google Scholar
Vaccaro, AR, Lehman, RA, Hurlbert, RJ, et al. A new classification of thoracolumbar injuries: The importance of injury morphology, the integrity of the posterior ligamentous complex, and neurologic status. Spine. 2005;30:2325–33.Google Scholar
White, AA 3rd, Panjabi, MM. The basic kinematics of the human spine. A review of past and current knowledge. Spine. 1978;3:12–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mumford, J, Weistein, JN, Spratt, KF, Goel, VK. Thoracolumbar burst fractures. The clinical efficacy and outcome of nonoperative management. Spine. 1993;18:955–70.Google Scholar
De Klerk, LW, Fontijine, WP, Stijinen, T, et al. Spinal canal remodeling in burst fractures of the thoracolumbar spine: A computerized tomographic comparison between operative and non-operative treatment. J Spinal Disord. 1996;9:409–13.Google Scholar
Alpantaki, K, Bano, A, Pasku, D, et al. Thoracolumbar burst fractures: A systematic review of management. Orthopedics. 2010;33:422–9.Google Scholar
Vaccaro, AR, Lehman, RA, Hurlbert, RJ, et al. A new classification of thoracolumbar injuries: The importance of injury morphology, the integrity of the posterior ligamentous complex, and neurologic status. Spine 2005;30:2325–333.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Magerl, F, Aebi, M, Gertzbein, SD, et al. A comprehensive classification of thoracic and lumbar injuries. Euro Spine J. 1994;3:184–201.Google Scholar
Li, SF, Cassidy, C, Chang, C, et al. Diagnostic utility of laboratory tests in septic arthritis. Emerg Med J. 2007;24:75–7.Google Scholar