Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-2l2gl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-29T02:29:53.484Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Evolutionary perspectives in conservation genetics

from Part I - Evolution, Ecology and Conservation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 April 2012

Aldo Poiani
Affiliation:
Monash University, Victoria
Get access

Summary

The world is currently experiencing loss of biodiversity due to direct and indirect anthropogenic causes unparalleled in human history. In this chapter, we expound on the importance of evolutionary thinking in our efforts to mitigate this loss. In Otto Frankel's (1974) words, ‘reinforcing the grounds for nature conservation with an evolutionary perspective may help to give conservation a permanence which a utilitarian, and even an ecological grounding, fails to provide in men's minds'. A simple argument-from-definition could be presented to justify this presumption: evolution is defined as change in the frequencies of genes and gene variants over space and time; population genetics deals with the intraspecific component of this dynamic; conservation genetics is applied population genetics, hence the direct link between evolution and conservation genetics. We aim to put forth a more synthetic justification based on the analysis of empirical studies that link evolutionary processes with conservation objectives.

Historical prelude

A number of recent reviews (Avise, 2010; Frankham, 2010) and books (Allendorf and Luikart, 2007; Avise, 2008) have documented historical developments in conservation biology that led to the emergence of the relatively young subdiscipline of conservation genetics. Awareness of the importance of conserving heritable variation dates back to Charles Darwin's days (Darwin, 1876). The 1960s and 1970s heralded molecular techniques that enabled quantifying heritable variation in natural populations (Hillis et al., 1996). In 1970 and 1974, building on these technological developments, but more significantly concerned over the vanishing genetic diversity of crop plants as a result of monoculture and the introduction of input-needy high-yielding crops in areas of genetic diversity, Otto Frankel published seminal papers on the urgent need to conserve genetic diversity. This led to changes in awareness not only among the scientific community, but also among the general public, particularly among conservation oriented non-governmental organisations (NGOs) and other civic groups (Mooney, 1996). A meeting of ecologists and evolutionary geneticists was held in 1978 aimed at integrating their respective approaches to mitigating the problem of extinction (Allendorf and Luikart, 2007) and acknowledging that conserving genetic diversity plays a significant role in this. The subsequent publication of Frankel and Soulé's book Conservation and Evolution in 1981 and the launch of the journal Conservation Genetics in 2000 represent significant milestones. The first dedicated conservation genetics textbook by Frankham was published in 2002 (Frankham et al., 2002).

Type
Chapter
Information
Pragmatic Evolution
Applications of Evolutionary Theory
, pp. 37 - 50
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agashe, D. 2009 The stabilizing effect of intraspecific genetic variation on population dynamics in novel and ancestral habitatsThe American Naturalist 174 255CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Allendorf, F.W.Luikart, G. 2007 Conservation and the Genetics of PopulationsBlackwellLondonGoogle Scholar
Aoki, K. 2008 Seed Wars: Cases and Materials on Intellectual Property and Plant Genetic ResourcesCarolina Academic PressDurham, NCGoogle Scholar
Avise, J.C. 2008 The history, purview, and future of conservation geneticsCarrol, S.P.Fox, C.W.Conservation Biology: Evolution in ActionOxford University PressNew York, NY5Google Scholar
Avise, J.C. 2010 Perspective: conservation genetics enters the genomics eraConservation Genetics 11 665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brook, B.W. 2008 Demographic versus genetics in conservation biologyCarrol, S.P.Fox, C.W.Conservation Biology: Evolution in ActionOxford University PressNew York, NY35Google Scholar
Charlesworth, D.Charlesworth, B. 1987 Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequencesAnnual Review of Ecology and Systematics 18 237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheverud, J.M.Vaughn, T.T.Pletcher, L.S. 1999 Epistasis and the evolution of additive genetic variation in populations that pass through a bottleneckEvolution 53 1009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, R.D.Lister, E.E.Buckley, J.T. 1995 Proceedings of the Third World Conference on Conservation of Domestic Animal Genetic ResourcesRare Breeds InternationalWarwickshire, EnglandGoogle Scholar
Crnokrak, P.Roff, D.A. 1999 Inbreeding depression in the wildHeredity 83 260CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Darwin, C. 1859 On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for LifeJohn MurrayLondonGoogle Scholar
Darwin, C. 1876 The Effects of Cross and Self Fertilization in the Vegetable KingdomJohn MurrayLondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dudash, M.R.Carr, D.E. 1998 Genetics underlying inbreeding depression in with contrasting mating systemsNature 393 682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elgar, M.A.Clode, D. 2001 Inbreeding and extinction in island populations: a cautionary noteConservation Biology 14 284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engels, J.M. M.Rao, R.Brown, A.H. D. 2002 Managing Plant Genetic DiversityCABI PublishingOxfordGoogle Scholar
Falconer, D.S.Mackay, T.F.C. 1996 Introduction to Quantitative GeneticsLongmans Green, Harlow, EssexGoogle Scholar
Fitzpatrick, J.L.Evans, J.P. 2009 Reduced heterozygosity impairs sperm quality in endangered mammalsBiology Letters 5 320CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frankel, O.H. 1970 Genetic conservation in perspectiveFrankel, O.H.Bennett, E.Genetic Resources in Plants – Their Exploitation and ConservationBlackwell Scientific PublicationsOxford469Google Scholar
Frankel, O.H. 1974 Genetic conservation: our evolutionary responsibilityGenetics 78 53Google ScholarPubMed
Frankel, O.H.Hawkes, J.G. 1975 Crop Genetic Resources for Today and TomorrowCambridge University PressCambridgeGoogle Scholar
Frankel, O.H.Soulé, M.E. 1981 Conservation and EvolutionCambridge University PressCambridgeGoogle Scholar
Frankham, R. 2005 Genetics and extinctionBiological Conservation 126 131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankham, R. 2010 Where are we in conservation genetics and where do we need to go?Conservation Genetics 11 661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankham, R.Ballou, J.D.Briscoe, D.A. 2002 Introduction to Conservation GeneticsCambridge University PressCambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankham, R.Ballou, J.D.Briscoe, D.A. 2009 Introduction to Conservation GeneticsCambridge University PressCambridgeGoogle Scholar
Gilligan, D.M.Woodworth, L.M.Montgomery, M.E. 1997 Is mutation accumulation a threat to the survival of endangered populations?Conservation Biology 11 1235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedrick, P.W. 2011 Genetics of PopulationsJones and BartlettSudbury, MAGoogle Scholar
Hillis, D.Moritz, C.Mable, B.K. 1996 Molecular SystematicsSinauerSunderland, MAGoogle Scholar
Hoelzel, A.R. 2010 Looking backwards to look forwards: conservation genetics in a changing worldConservation Genetics 11 655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, A.R.Inouye, B.D.Johnson, M.T. J. 2008 Ecological consequences of genetic diversityEcology Letters 11 609CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature) 2001 Red List Categories and Criteria Version 3.1IUCNGland, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
Jimenez, J.A.Hughes, K.A.Alaks, G. 1994 An experimental study of inbreeding depression in a natural habitatScience 266 271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohn, M.H.Murphy, W.J.Ostrander, E.A. 2006 Genomics and conservation geneticsTrends in Ecology and Evolution 21 629CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lacy, R.C.Alaks, G.Walsh, A. 1996 Hierarchical analysis of inbreeding depression in Evolution 50 2187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laikre, L. 2010 Genetic diversity is overlooked in international conservation policy implementationConservation Genetics 11 349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lande, R. 1988 Genetics and demography in biological conservationScience 241 1455CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lynch, M.Walsh, J.B. 1998 Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative TraitsSinauerSunderland, MAGoogle Scholar
Lynch, M.Conery, J.Burger, R. 1995 Mutation accumulation and the extinction of small populationsAmerican Naturalist 146 489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margulis, S.W. 1998 Relationships among parental inbreeding, parental behaviour and offspring viability in oldfield miceAnimal Behavior 55 427CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mikkelsen, K.Loeschcke, V.Kristensen, T.N. 2010 Trait specific consequences of fast and slow inbreeding: lessons from captive populations of Conservation Genetics 11 479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNeely, J.A. 1998 Major Conservation Issues of the 1990s: Results of the World Conservation Congress WorkshopsIUCNGland, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
Meagher, S.Penn, D.J.Potts, W.K. 2000 Male–male competition magnifies inbreeding depression in wild house miceProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 97 3324CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mooney, P.R. 1996
Newman, D.Pilson, D. 1997 Increased probability of extinction due to decreased effective population size: experimental populations of Evolution 51 354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ouborg, N.J. 2009 Integrating population genetics and conservation biology in the era of genomicsBiology Letters 6 3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ouborg, N.J.Angeloni, F.Vergeer, P. 2010 An essay on the necessity and feasibility of conservation genomicsConservation Genetics 11 643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pimm, S.L. 1991 The Balance of Nature: Ecological Issues in the Conservation of Species and CommunitiesUniversity of Chicago PressChicago, ILGoogle Scholar
Primmer, C.R. 2009 From conservation genetics to conservation genomicsAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1162 357CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Radwan, J. 2003 Inbreeding depression in fecundity and inbred line extinction in the bulb mite, Heredity 90 371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ralls, K.Ballou, J. 1982 Effect of inbreeding on juvenile mortality in some small mammal speciesLaboratory Animals 16 159CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ralls, K.Ballou, J.D.Rideout, B. 2000 Genetic management of chondrodystrophy in California condorsAnimal Conservation 3 145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, D.H.Frankham, R. 2003 Correlation between fitness and genetic diversityConservation Biology 17 230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, D.H.Lowe, E.H.Briscoe, D.A. 2003 Inbreeding and extinction: effects of rate of inbreedingConservation Genetics 4 405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saccheri, I.Kuussaari, M.Kankare, M. 1998 Inbreeding and extinction in a butterfly metapopulationNature 392 491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spielman, D.Brook, B.W.Frankham, R. 2004 Most species are not driven to extinction before genetic factors impact themProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 101 15261CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vilas, C.San Miguel, E.Amaro, R. 2006 Relative contribution of inbreeding depression and eroded adaptive diversity to extinction risk in small populations of shore campionConservation Biology 20 229CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, E.O. 1992 The Diversity of LifeHarvard University PressCambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
Xu, Y.C.Fang, S.G.Li, Z.K. 2007 Sustainability of the South China tiger: implications of inbreeding depression and introgressionConservation Genetics 8 1199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, T.P. 1991 Diversity overratedNature 352 10CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×