Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-sh8wx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T04:24:21.365Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Biological diversity

from Part II - Principles and rules establishing standards

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Philippe Sands
Affiliation:
University College London
Jacqueline Peel
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne
Adriana Fabra
Affiliation:
Universitat de Barcelona
Ruth MacKenzie
Affiliation:
University of Westminster
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

The term ‘biodiversity’ is of relatively recent usage in international law. Until the 1980s, international instruments tended to address ‘wildlife’ or ‘wild fauna and flora’, and focused on species and habitats. ‘Biodiversity’ is a more inclusive term and can be considered in relation to three hierarchical categories which describe different aspects of living systems measured in different ways: genetic diversity; species diversity; and ecosystem diversity. Other expressions of biodiversity include the relative abundance of species, the age structure of populations, the pattern of communities in a region, and changes in community composition and structure over time.

However measured, there is a scientific consensus that biodiversity is being lost. In 2002, the parties to the 1992 Convention on Biological Diversity adopted the 2010 Biodiversity Target ‘to achieve by 2010 a significant reduction of the current rate of biodiversity loss at the global, regional and national level as a contribution to poverty alleviation and to the benefit of all life on Earth’. In 2010, it was acknowledged that this target had not been met, that the state of biodiversity continued to decline and that pressures on biodiversity were increasing. The 2010 Global Biodiversity Outlook (GBO) suggests that just under 130,000 square kilometres of forest were converted to other uses or were lost through natural causes each year from 2000 to 2010. It records that more than 95 per cent of North American grasslands have been lost, and that savanna and grassland have suffered severe declines elsewhere. The GBO also notes that terrestrial habitats have become highly fragmented, threatening the viability of many species and ecosystem services. The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment reports that about 20 per cent of the world's coral reefs have been destroyed and another 20 per cent degraded. In relation to species populations, the GBO suggests that the population of wild vertebrate species fell by an average of 31 per cent globally between 1970 and 2006, with particularly severe declines in the tropics and in freshwater ecosystems. The IUCN Red List, which evaluates the conservation status of animal and plant species, had, by 2009, assessed 47,677 species, of which 36 per cent were considered threatened with extinction.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

de Klemm, C.‘Conservation of Species: The Need for a New Approach’Environmental Policy and Law 117 1982Google Scholar
Bowman, M.‘The Protection of Animals under International Law’Connecticut Journal of International Law 487 1989Google Scholar
Doremus, J.‘Patching the Ark: Improving Legal Protection of Biological Diversity’Ecology Law Quarterly 265 1991Google Scholar
Casey-Lefkowitz, S.‘The New Law of Biodiversity’Yearbook of International Environmental Law 43 1992Google Scholar
Hermitte, M. A.‘La Convention sur la Diversité Biologique’Annuaire Français de Droit International 844 1992Google Scholar
Shine, C.Kohona, P. T. B.‘The Convention on Biological Diversity: Bridging the Gap Between Conservation and Development’Review of European Community and International Environmental Law 307 1992Google Scholar
Burhenne-Guilmin, F.Casey-Lefkowitz, S.‘The Convention on Biological Diversity: A Hard Won Global Achievement’Yearbook of International Environmental Law 43 1992Google Scholar
Chandler, M.‘The Biodiversity Convention: Selected Issues of Interest to the International Lawyer’Colorado Journal of International Law and Policy 141 1993Google Scholar
Koester, V.‘The Biodiversity Convention Negotiating Process and Some Comments on the Outcome’Environmental Policy and Law 175 1997Google Scholar
Chape, S.Spalding, M.Jenkins, M.The World's Protected Areas: Status, Values and Prospects in the 21st Century 2008 11
Singh Nijar, G.‘Incorporating Traditional Knowledge in an International Regime on Access to Genetic Resources and Benefit Sharing: Problems and Prospects’European Journal of International Law 457 2010Google Scholar
Chandler, M.‘The Biodiversity Convention: Selected Issues of Interest to the International Lawyer’Colorado Journal of International Law and Policy 141 1993Google Scholar
Morgera, E.‘Far Away, So Close: A Legal Analysis of the Increasing Interaction Between the Convention on Biological Diversity and Climate Change Law’Climate Law 85 2011Google Scholar
Arico, S.Salpin, C.Bioprospecting of Genetic Resources of the Deep-Sea-Bed: Scientific, Legal and Policy AspectsUnited Nations University, Institute of Advanced Studies 2005Google Scholar
Buck, M.Hamilton, C.‘The Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from Their Utilization to the Convention on Biological Diversity’Review of European Community and International Environmental Law 47 2011Google Scholar
Stoll, P.-T.‘Controlling the Risks of GMOs: The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety and the SPS Agreement’Yearbook of International Environmental Law 82 1999Google Scholar
Eggers, B.Mackenzie, R.‘The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety’Journal of International Economic Law 525 2000Google Scholar
Boisson de Chazournes, L.Thomas, U.‘The Biosafety Protocol: Regulatory Innovation and Emerging Trends’Revue Suisse de Droit International 513 2000Google Scholar
Qureshi, A. H.‘The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety and the WTO: Coexistence or Incoherence?’International and Comparative Law Quarterly 835 2000Google Scholar
Koester, V.‘A New Hot Spot in the Trade–Environment Conflict’Environmental Policy and Law 82 2001Google Scholar
Katz, D.‘The Mismatch Between the Biosafety Protocol and the Precautionary Principle’Georgetown International Environmental Law Review 949 2001Google Scholar
Kosloff, L. H.Trexler, M.C.‘The Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species: No Carrot, But Where's the Stick?’Environmental Law Review 10,222 1987Google Scholar
Sands, P.Bedecarré, A.‘Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species: The Role of Public Interest Non-Governmental Organisations in Ensuring the Effective Enforcement of the Ivory Trade Ban’Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review 799 1990Google Scholar
Karno, V.‘Protection of Endangered Gorillas and Chimpanzees in International Trade: Can CITES Help?’Hastings International and Comparative Law Review 989 1991Google Scholar
Sand, P.‘Whither CITES? The Evolution of a Treaty Regime on the Borderland of Trade and Environment’Journal of Environmental Law 29 1997Google Scholar
Bowman, M.‘CITES: Trade Conservation and Animal Welfare’Journal of International Wildlife Law and Policy 9 1999Google Scholar
Martin-Nagle, R.‘Unsuccessful Attempt to List Atlantic Bluefin Tuna in CITES Appendix I’International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 609 2010Google Scholar
Timoshenko, A.‘Protection of Wetlands by International Law’Pace Environmental Law Review 463 1988Google Scholar
Bowman, M.‘The Ramsar Convention Comes of Age’Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 1 1995Google Scholar
Farrier, D.Tucker, L.‘Wise Use of Wetlands under the Ramsar Convention: A Challenge for Meaningful Implementation of International Law’Journal of Environmental Law 21 2000Google Scholar
Saunders, M. B.‘Valuation and International Regulation of Forestry Ecosystems: Prospects for a Global Forest Agreement’Washington Law Review 871 1991Google Scholar
Schally, H.‘Forests: Towards an International Legal Regime?’Yearbook of International Environmental Law 30 1993Google Scholar
Bankes, N. D.‘Migratory Caribou Convention’Canadian Yearbook of International Law 285 1980Google Scholar
de Klemm, C.‘Migratory Species in International Law’Natural Resources Journal 935 1989Google Scholar
Lyster, S.‘The Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals’Natural Resources Journal 979 1989Google Scholar
Glowka, L.‘Complementarities Between the CMS and CITES’Journal of International Wildlife Law and Policy 205 2000Google Scholar
de Klemm, C.‘Migratory Species: A Review of Existing International Instruments’Environmental Policy and Law 81 1985Google Scholar
Johnston, S.‘Conservation Role of Botanic Gardens and Gene Banks’Review of European Community and International Environmental Law 172 1993Google Scholar
Cooper, D.‘The International Undertaking on Plant Genetic Resources’Review of European Community and International Environmental Law 158 1993Google Scholar
Margulies, R. L.‘Protecting Biodiversity: Recognising International Intellectual Property Rights in Plant Genetic Resources’Michigan Journal of International Law 322 1993Google Scholar
Cooper, D.‘The International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture’Review of European Community and International Environmental Law 1 2002Google Scholar
Atherton, T. C.Atherton, T.‘The Power and the Glory: National Sovereignty and the World Heritage Convention’Australian Law Journal 631 1995Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×