Book contents
- Proactive Support of LaborThe Challenge of Normal ChildbirthSecond edition
- Proactive Support of Labor
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Foreword to the first edition
- Preface
- Web-links
- Chapter 1 General introduction
- Section 1 A wake-up call
- Section 2 Back to basics
- Section 3 Proactive support of labor
- Index
- References
Section 2 - Back to basics
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 September 2015
Book contents
- Proactive Support of LaborThe Challenge of Normal ChildbirthSecond edition
- Proactive Support of Labor
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Foreword to the first edition
- Preface
- Web-links
- Chapter 1 General introduction
- Section 1 A wake-up call
- Section 2 Back to basics
- Section 3 Proactive support of labor
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Proactive Support of LaborThe Challenge of Normal Childbirth, pp. 49 - 80Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2015
References
References
Naaktgeboren, C. The biology of childbirth. In Chalmers, I, Keirse, MJNC, Enkin, M, eds. Effective Care in Pregnancy and Childbirth, Vol. 2: Childbirth. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1998Google Scholar
Parkes, AS. Marshall’s Physiology of Reproduction 4th edn, Vol. 2. London: Longmans, Green; 1958:504–5Google Scholar
Young, IR. The comparative physiology of parturition in mammals. Front Horm Res 2001;27:10–30CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fortman, JD, Hewett, TA, Bennet, BT. The Laboratory Non-Human Primates. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2000Google Scholar
Jensen, P. The Ethology of Domestic Animals: An Introductory Text. New York: CABI Publishing; 2002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagel, C, Erber, R, Bergmaier, C, et al. Cortisol and progestin release, heart rate and heart rate variability in the pregnant and postpartum mare, fetus and newborn foal. Theriogenology 2012;78:759–67CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Belsey, EM, Rosenblatt, DB, Lieberman, BA, et al. The influence of maternal analgesia on neonatal behaviour: I. Pethidine. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1981;88:398–406Google Scholar
Kron, RE, Stein, M, Goddard, KE. Newborn sucking behavior affected by obstetric sedation. Pediatrics 1966;37:1012–16CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hodgkinson, R, Bhatt, M, Wang, CN. Double-blind comparison of the neurobehaviour of neonates following the administration of different doses of meperidine to the mother. Can Anaesth Soc J 1978;25:405–11Google Scholar
Righard, L, Alade, MO. Effect of delivery room routines on success of first breast-feed. Lancet 1990;336:1105–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nissen, E, Lilja, G, Matthiesen, AS, et al. Effects of maternal pethidine on infants’ developing breastfeeding behaviour. Acta Paediatr 1995;84:140–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, MK. The relationship between maternal labour analgesia and delay in the initiation of breastfeeding in healthy neonates in the early neonatal period. Midwifery 1989;5:3–10Google Scholar
Crowell, MK, Hill, PD, Humenick, SS. Relationship between obstetric analgesia and time of effective breastfeeding. J Nurse Midwifery 1994;39:150–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagel, C, Erber, R, Ille, N, et al. Parturition in horses is dominated by parasympathetic activity of the autonomous nervous system. Theriogenology 2014;82:160–8Google Scholar
Friedman, DD. Conflict behavior in the parturient. In Hirsh, H, ed. The Family. Proceedings of the 4th International Congress of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology. Basel: Karger; 1975:373–6Google Scholar
Newton, N, Foshee, D, Newton, M. Experimental inhibition of labor through environmental disturbance. Obstet Gynecol 1966;27:371–7Google ScholarPubMed
Rosenberg, K, Trevathan, W. Birth, obstetrics and human evolution. Br J Obstet Gynaec 2002;109:1199–206Google Scholar
Lopez, Bernal A. Overview of current research in parturition (Uterine Contractility Symposium of the Physiological Society). Exp Physiol 2001;86:213–22Google Scholar
Nathanielsz, PW. Comparative studies on the initiation of labor. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1998;78:127–32CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lawrence, AB, Petherick, JC, McLean, K, et al. Naloxone prevents interruption of parturition and increases plasma oxytocin following environmental disturbance in parturient sows. Physiol Behav 1992;52:917–23Google Scholar
Wijnen, HA, Denollet, J, Essed, GG, et al. High maternal anxiety during late gestation predicts protraction of labor. In Wijnen, HA, ed. The Kempen Study. Academic Thesis 2005, University of Tilburg, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
References
Norwitz, ER, Robinson, JN, Repke, JT. The Initiation of Parturition: A Comparative Analysis Across the Species. New York: Mosby; 1999Google Scholar
Liao, JB, Buhimshi, CS, Norwitz, ER. Normal labor: Mechanism and duration. Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am 2005;32:145–64Google Scholar
Lye, SJ, Challis, JRG. Parturition. In: Harding, R, Bocking, AD, eds. Fetal Growth and Development. Cambridge University Press; 2001:241–66Google Scholar
Challis, JGR, Matthews, SG, Gibb, W, et al. Endocrine and paracrine regulation of birth at term and preterm. Endocr Rev 2000;21:514–20Google Scholar
Norwitz, ER, Robinson, JN, Challis, JRG. The control of labor (review articles). N Engl J Med 1999;341:660–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makieva, S, Saunders, PT, Norman, JE. Androgens in pregnancy: roles in parturition. Hum Reprod Update 2014;20:542–59Google Scholar
Kamel, RM. The onset of human parturition. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2010;281:975–82CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gomez-Lopez, N, Tanaka, S, Zaeem, Z, et al. Maternal circulating leukocytes display early chemotactic responsiveness during late gestation. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2013;13 Suppl 1:S1–S8 Epub 2013 Jan 31Google Scholar
Mesiano, S, Wang, Y, Norwitz, ER. Progesterone receptors in the human pregnancy uterus: do they hold the key to birth timing? Reprod Sci 2011;18:6–19Google Scholar
Golightly, E, Jabbour, HN, Norman, JE. Endocrine immune interactions in human parturition. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2011;335:52–9Google Scholar
You, X, Liu, J, Xu, C, et al. Corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) promotes inflammation in human pregnant myometrium: The evidence of CRH initiating parturition? J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2014;99:199–208CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, R, Van Helden, D, Hirst, J, et al. Pathological interactions with the timing of birth and uterine activation. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2007;47:430–7Google Scholar
Shynlova, O, Tsui, P, Jaffer, S, Lye, SJ. Integration of endocrine and mechanical signals in the regulation of myometrial functions during pregnancy and labour. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2009;144 Suppl 1:S2–10CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lopez, Bernal A. Overview of current research in parturition (Uterine Contractility Symposium of the Physiological Society). Exp Physiol 2001;86:213–22Google Scholar
Hendricks, CH, Brenner, WE, Kraus, G. Normal cervical dilatation pattern in late pregnancy and labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1970;106:1065–82Google Scholar
Chow, L, Lye, SJ. Expression of the gap junction protein connexin-43 is increased in the human myometrium toward term and with the onset of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994;170:788–95CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shojo, H, Kaneko, Y. Characterization and expression of oxytocin and the oxytocin receptor. Mol Genet Metab 2000;71:552–8Google Scholar
Blanks, AM, Thornton, S. The role of oxytocin in parturition. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2003;110 (Suppl 20):46–51Google Scholar
Enkin, M, Keirse, MJNC, Neilson, J, et al. A Guide to Effective Care in Pregnancy and Childbirth, 3rd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000:332–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buhimschi, C, Buhimschi, IA. The forces of labour. Fetal and Maternal Medicine Review 2003;14:273–307Google Scholar
Gough, GW, Randall, NJ, Genevier, ES, Sutherland, IA, Steer, PJ. Head-to-cervix forces and their relationship to the outcome of labor. Obstet Gynecol 1990;75:613–18Google Scholar
Antonucci, MC, Pitman, MC, Eid, T, Steer, PJ, Genevier, ES. Simultaneous monitoring of head-to-cervix forces, intrauterine pressure and cervical dilatation during labour. Med Eng Phys. 1997;19:317–26Google Scholar
Allman, AC, Genevier, ES, Johnson, MR, et al. Head-to-cervix force: an important physiological variable in labour. 1. The temporal relation between head-to-cervix force and uterine pressure during labour. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1996;103:763–8Google ScholarPubMed
Allman, AC, Genevier, ES, Johnson, MR, Steer, PJ. Head-to-cervix force: an important physiological variable in labour. 2. Peak active force, peak active pressure and mode of delivery. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1996;103:769–75Google Scholar
Quenby, S, Pierce, SJ, Brigham, S, Wray, S. Dysfunctional labor and myometrial lactic acidosis. Obstet Gynecol 2004;103:718–23Google Scholar
Phaneuf, S, Asboth, G, Carrasco, MP, et al. Desensitization of oxytocin receptors in human myometrium. Hum Reprod Update 1998;4:625–33Google Scholar
Phaneuf, S, Rodriguez, Linares B, TamByraja, RL, et al. Loss of oxytocin receptors during oxytocin-induced and oxytocin-augmented labour. J Reprod Fertil 2000;120:91–7Google Scholar
Pariente, G, Peles, C, Perri, ZH, et al. Meconium-stained amniotic fluid – risk factors and immediate perinatal outcomes among SGA infants. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2014;30:1–4Google Scholar
Matsubara, S, Yamada, T, Minakama, H, et al. Meconium-stained fluid activates polymorphonuclear leucocytes; ultrastructural and enzyme cytochemical evidence. Eur J Histochem 1999;43:205–10Google Scholar
Anahya, SN, Kakshmanan, J, Morgan, BL, Ross, MG. Meconium passage in utero: mechanisms, consequences, and management. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2005;60:45–56Google Scholar
Mark, SP, Croughan-Minihane, MS, Kilpatrick, SJ. Chorioamnionitis and uterine function. Obstet Gynecol 2000;95:909–12Google ScholarPubMed
Rauk, PN, Chiao, JP. Oxytocin signaling in human myometrium is impaired by prolonged exposure to interleukin-1. Biol Reprod 2000;63:846–50Google Scholar
Rauk, PN, Friebe-Hoffman, U. Interleukin 1-beta down regulates the oxytocin receptor in cultured uterine smooth muscle cells. Am J Reprod Immunol 2000;43:83–9Google Scholar
NICE guidelines. Intrapartum care: care of healthy women and their babies during childbirth. RCOG Press; 2007. Updated 2010; www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg55Google Scholar
Fairlie, FM, Phillips, GF, Andrews, BJ, Calder, AA. An analysis of uterine activity in spontaneous labour using a microcomputer. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1988;95:57–64Google Scholar
Arulkumaran, S, Gibb, DM, Lun, KC, et al. The effect of parity on uterine activity in labour. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1984;91:843–8Google Scholar
References
O’Driscoll, K, Meagher, D, Robson, M. Active Management of Labour, 4th edn. London: Mosby; 2003Google Scholar
Friedman, EA. Labor: Clinical Evaluation and Management, 2nd edn. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts; 1978Google Scholar
Cunningham, FG, Leveno, KJ, Bloom, SL, et al. Normal labor and delivery. In: Williams Obstetrics, 22nd edn. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2005:407–42Google Scholar
Arrabal, PP, Nagey, DA. Is manual palpation of uterine contractions accurate? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;174: 217–19Google Scholar
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstetric Care Consensus No 1: Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2014;123:693–711Google Scholar
Ehsanipoor, RM, Satin, AJ. Overview of normal labor and protraction and arrest disorders. UpToDate. Accessed November 2014Google Scholar
Pauli, JM, Repke, JT. Insertion of intrauterine pressure catheters. UpToDate. Accessed November 2014Google Scholar
References
Cunningham, FG, Leveno, KJ, Bloom, SL. Section IV. Labor and delivery. In: Williams Obstetrics, 22nd edn. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2005:423Google Scholar
Friedman, EA. Labor: Clinical Evaluation and Management, 2nd edn. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts; 1978Google Scholar
NICE Guidelines. Intrapartum care: care of healthy women and their babies during childbirth. 2007. RCOG Press. Updated 2010 www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg55Google Scholar
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin Number 49, December 2003. Dystocia and augmentation of labor. Obstet Gynecol 2003;106:1445–53Google Scholar
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstetric Care Consensus No 1: Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2014;123:693–711Google Scholar
Zhang, J, Landy, HJ, Branch, DW, et al. (Consortium on Safe Labor). Contemporary patterns of spontaneous labor with normal neonatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2010;116:1281–7Google Scholar
Hendricks, CH, Brenner, WE, Kraus, G. Normal cervical dilatation pattern in late pregnancy and labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1970;106:1065–82Google Scholar
Maghoma, J, Buchmann, EJ. Maternal and fetal risks associated with prolonged latent phase of labor. J Obstet Gynaecol 2002;22:16–19Google Scholar
Friedman, EA, Neff, RK. Labor and delivery: impact on offspring. PSG, Littleton, MA (1987)Google Scholar
Chelmow, D, Kilpatrick, SJ, Laros, RK. Maternal and neonatal outcomes after prolonged latent phase. Obstet Gynecol 1993;81:486–91Google Scholar
Cheng, YW, Shaffer, BL, Bryant, AS, Caughey, AB. Length of the first stage of labor and associated perinatal outcomes in nulliparous women. J Obstet Gynaecol 2010;116:1127–35Google Scholar
Malone, FD, Geary, M, Chelmow, D, et al. Prolonged labor in nulliparas: lesson from the active management of labor. Obstet Gynecol 1996;88:211–15Google Scholar
Gharoro, EP, Enabudoso, EJ. Labor management: an appraisal of the role of false labor and latent phase on the delivery mode. J Obstet Gynecol 2006;26:534–37Google Scholar
Jackson, DB, Lang, JM, Ecker, J, Swartz, WH, Heeren, T. Impact of collaborative management and early admission in labor on method of delivery. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2003;32:147–57Google Scholar
Bailit, JL, Dierker, LR, Blanchard, MH, Mercer, BM. Outcome of women presenting in active versus latent phase of spontaneous labor. Obstet Gynecol, 2005;105:77–9Google Scholar
Holmes, P, Oppenheimer, LW, Wen, SW. The relationship between cervical dilatation at initial presentation in labor and subsequent interventions. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2001;108:1120–24Google Scholar
Hemminki, E, Simukka, R. The timing on hospital admission and progress of labor. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1986;22:85–94Google Scholar
Cunningham, FG, Gant, NF, Leveno, KJ. Section, V. Abnormal labor. In: Williams Obstetrics, 21st edn. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2001:425–67Google Scholar
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin Number 49, December 2003. Dystocia and augmentation of labor. Obstet Gynecol 2003;106:1445–53Google Scholar
Neal, JL, Lowe, NK, Patrick, TE, Cabbage, LA, Corwin, EJ. What is the slowest-yet-normal cervical dilation rate among nulliparous women with spontaneous labor onset? J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2010;39:361–9Google Scholar
Neal, JL, Lowe, NK, Ahijevych, KL, et al. “Active labor” duration and dilation rates among low-risk, nulliparous women with spontaneous labor onset: a systematic review. J Midwifery Womens Health 2010;55:308–18Google Scholar
Perinatal Care in the Netherlands 2012 (in Dutch) Stichting Perinatale Registratie Nederland. www.perinatreg.nlGoogle Scholar
O’Driscoll, K, Meagher, D, Robson, M. Active Management of Labour, 4th edn. London: Mosby; 2003Google Scholar
Robson, M, Hartigan, L, Murphy, M. Methods of achieving and maintaining an appropriate caesarean section rate. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2013;27:297–308CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Graseck, A, Tuuli, M, Roehl, K, et al. Fetal descent in labor. Obstet Gynecol 2014;123:521–6Google Scholar
Sellheim, H. Die Beziehungen des Geburtskanales und des Geburtsobjectes zur Geburtsmechanik. Leipzig: Thieme; 1906 (in German)Google Scholar
References
Naaktgeboren, C. The biology of childbirth. In: Chalmers, I, Keirse, MJNC, Enkin, M, eds. Effective Care in Pregnancy and Childbirth, Vol. 2: Childbirth. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1998Google Scholar
Rosenberg, K, Trevathan W. Birth: obstetrics and human evolution. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2002;109:1199–206Google Scholar
Sellheim, H. Die Beziehungen des Geburtskanales und des Geburtsobjectes zur Geburtsmechanik. Leipzig: Thieme; 1906 (in German)Google Scholar
Trevathan, W. Human Birth: An Evolutionary Perspective. New York: Aldine de Gruyter; 1987Google Scholar
Russell, JPG. Moulding of the pelvic outlet. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw 1969;76:817–20Google Scholar
Ashford, JI. Posture for labor and birth. In: Rothman, BK, ed. Encyclopedia of Childbearing. Phoenix, AZ: Oryx Press 1993:313–35Google Scholar
Gardosi, J, Hutson, M, B-Lynch, C. Randomised, controlled trial of squatting in the second stage of labour. Lancet 1989;2:74–7Google Scholar
Anim-Somuah, MA, Smyth, RM, Jones, L. Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011Google Scholar
Tuuli, MG, Frey, HA, Odibo, AO, Macones, GA, Cahill, AG. Immediate compared with delayed pushing in the second stage of labor: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2012;120:660–8Google Scholar
Dupuis, O, Silveira, R, Zentner, A, et al. Birth simulator: reliability of transvaginal assessment of fetal head station as defined by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists classification. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;192:868–874Google Scholar
Buchmann, E, Libhaber, E. Interobserver agreement in intra-partum estimation of fetal head station. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2008;101:285–9Google Scholar
Youssef, A, Maroni, E, Ragusa, A, et al. Fetal head–symphysis distance: a simple and reliable ultrasound index of fetal head station in labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013;41:419–24Google Scholar
Stitely, ML, Gherman, RB. Labor with abnormal presentation and position. Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am 2005;32:165–79CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cunningham, FG, Leveno, KJ, Bloom, SL. Dystocia: abnormal labor and delivery. In: Williams Obstetrics, 22nd edn. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2005Google Scholar
O’Driscoll, K, Meagher, D, Active, Robson M. Management of Labour, 4th edn. London: Mosby; 2003Google Scholar
Gardberg, M, Laakkonen, E, Salevaara, M. Intrapartum sonography and persistent occiput posterior position; a study of 408 deliveries. Obstet Gynecol 1998;91:746–9Google Scholar
Pritchard, JA, MacDonald, PC, eds. Williams Obstetrics, 16th edn. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1980. Chapters 12 and 16Google Scholar
Stitely, ML, Gherman, RB. Labor with abnormal presentation and position. Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am 2005;32:165–79Google Scholar