Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-cnmwb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T08:46:53.499Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - Nulliparous versus parous labor

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 September 2009

Paul Reuwer ,
Hein Bruinse  and
Arie Franx
Paul Reuwer
Affiliation:
St Elisabeth Hospital/Brabant Medical School, Tilburg, Netherlands
Hein Bruinse
Affiliation:
University Medical Center Utrecht, Netherlands
Arie Franx
Affiliation:
St Elisabeth Hospital/Brabant Medical School, Tilburg, Netherlands
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Proactive Support of Labor
The Challenge of Normal Childbirth
 , pp. 104 - 109
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

O'Driscoll, K, Meagher, D, Robson, M. Active Management of Labour, 4th edn. Mosby; 2003.Google Scholar
Enkin, M, Keirse, MJNC, Neilson, J, et al. Prolonged labor. In: A Guide to Effective Care in Pregnancy and Childbirth, 3rd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000: 332–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melmed, H, Evans, M. Predictive value of cervical dilatation rates, I Primigravids. Obstet Gynecol 1976; 47: 1568–75.Google Scholar
Chelmow, D, Kilpatrick, SJ, Laros, RK jr. Maternal and neonatal outcomes after prolonged latent phase. Obstet Gynecol 1993; 81(4): 486–91.Google ScholarPubMed
Norwitz, ER, Robinson, JN, Repke, JT. Labor and delivery. In: Gabbe, SG, Neibyl, JR, Simpson, JL, eds. Obstetrics: Normal and Problem Pregnancies, 4th edn. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingston; 2002: 353–94.Google Scholar
Levine, MG, Holroyde, J, Woods, JR Jr, et al. Birth trauma: incidence and predisposing factors. Obstet Gynecol 1984; 63: 792–5.Google ScholarPubMed
Williams, MC, Knuppel, RA, O'Brien, WF, et al. Obstetric correlates of neonatal retinal hemorrhage. Obstet Gynecol 1993; 81: 688–94.Google ScholarPubMed
Gebremariam, A. Subgaleal haemorrhage: risk factors and neurological and developmental outcome in survivors. Ann Trop Paediatr 1999; 19: 45–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chadwick, LM, Pemberton, PJ, Kurinczuk, JJ. Neonatal subgaleal haematoma: associated risk factors, complications and outcome. J Paediatr Child Health 1996; 32: 228–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, JH, Figueroa, R, Garry, D, et al. Immediate maternal and neonatal effects of forceps and vacuum-assisted deliveries. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 103: 513–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Uchil, D, Arulkumaran, S. Neonatal subgaleal hemorrhage and its relationship to delivery by vacuum extraction. Obstet Gynecol Survey 2003; 58: 687–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, RB, Menon, BK. Vacuum extraction versus forceps for assisted vaginal delivery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000; (2): CD 00024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kafkas, F, Taner, CE. Ruptured uterus. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1991; 34(1): 41–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vedet, A, Hasan, B, Ismail, A. Rupture of the uterus in labor: a review of 150 cases. Isr J Med Sci 1993; 29(10): 639–43.Google Scholar
Lydon-Rochelle, M, Holt, VL, Easterling, TR, et al. Risk of uterine rupture during labor among women with a prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 3–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, DA, Goodwin, TM, Gherman, RB, et al. Intrapartum rupture of the unscarred uterus. Obstet Gynecol 1997; 89: 671–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoskins, IA, Gomez, JL. Correlation between maximum cervical dilatation at cesarean delivery and subsequent vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 1997; 89(4): 591–3.Google ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×