Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m42fx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-23T17:20:33.889Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 22 - Obstructed labor

from Section 3 - Proactive support of labor

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2015

Paul Reuwer
Affiliation:
Department of Obstetrics, St Elisabeth Hospital, Tilburg
Hein Bruinse
Affiliation:
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Utrecht University Medical Center
Arie Franx
Affiliation:
Department of Obstetrics, St Elisabeth Hospital, Tilburg
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Proactive Support of Labor
The Challenge of Normal Childbirth
, pp. 150 - 155
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brill, Y, Windrim, R. Vaginal birth after cesarean section: review of antenatal predictors of success. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2003;25:275–86Google Scholar
Pattinson, RC, Farrel, E. Pelvimetry for fetal cephalic presentations at or near term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007Google Scholar
Maharaj, D. Assessing cephalopelvic disproportion: back to the basics. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2010;65:387–95Google Scholar
Orion, O, Boulvain, M. Induction of labour for suspected fetal macrosomia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011Google Scholar
Sanchez-Ramos, K, Bernstein, S, Kaunitz, AM. Expectant management versus labor induction for suspected fetal macrosomia: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 2002;100:9971002Google Scholar
O’Driscoll, K, Meagher, D, Robson, M. Active Management of Labour, 4th edn. London: Mosby; 2003Google Scholar
Ehsanipoor, RM, Satin, AJ. Overview of normal labor and protraction and arrest disorders. UpToDate. Accessed November 2014Google Scholar
Verhoeven, CJ, Mulders, LG, Oei, SG, Mol, BW. Does ultrasonographic foetal head position prior to induction of labour predict the outcome of delivery? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2012;164:133–7Google Scholar
Gardberg, M, Laakkonen, E, Salevaara, M. Intrapartum sonography and persistent occiput posterior position: a study of 408 deliveries. Obstet Gynecol 1998;91:746–9Google Scholar
Cunningham, FG, Leveno, KJ, Hauth, JC (eds). Normal Labor and Delivery. In: Williams Obstetrics, 22nd edn. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2005:407–41Google Scholar
Cruikshank, DP, White, CA. Obstetric malpresentations: Twenty years’ experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1973;116:1097–104Google Scholar
Sadeh-Mestechkin, D, Walfisch, A, Shachar, R, et al. Suspected macrosomia? Better not tell. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2008;278:225–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosen, M, Debanne, S, Thompson, K, Dickinson, JC. Abnormal labor and infant brain damage. Obstet Gynecol 1992;80:961–5Google Scholar
Rodis, JF. Shoulder dystocia: Intrapartum diagnosis, management, and outcome. UpToDate. Accessed November 2014Google Scholar
ACOG Practice Bulletin 40. Clinical Management Guidelines for Obstetrician-Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2002;100:1045–50Google Scholar
Øverland, EA1, Vatten, LJ, Eskild, A. Pregnancy week at delivery and the risk of shoulder dystocia: a population study of 2,014,956 deliveries. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2014;121:3441Google Scholar
Rodis, JF. Shoulder dystocia: Risk factors and planning delivery of at risk pregnancies. UpToDate. Accessed November 2014Google Scholar
Rouse, DJ, Owen, J. Prophylactic cesarean delivery for fetal macrosomia diagnosed by means of ultrasonography; a Faustian bargain? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;181:332–8Google Scholar
Politi, S, DʼEmidio, L, Cignini, P, et al. Shoulder dystocia: an Evidence-Based approach. J Prenat Med 2010;4:3542Google Scholar
Cruikshank, DP, Cruikshank, JE. Face and brow presentations: A review. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1981;24:333–51Google Scholar
Stitely, ML, Gherman, RB. Labor with abnormal presentation and position. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2005;32:165–79Google Scholar
Speer, DP, Peltier, LF. Pelvic fractures and pregnancy. J Trauma 1972;12:474–80Google Scholar
Riehl, JT. Caesarean section rates following pelvic fracture: A systematic review. Injury 2014;45:1516–21CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×