References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 June 2022
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Proclus: Commentary on Plato's 'Republic' , pp. 332 - 340Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022
References
Abbate, Michele. 2004. Proclo: Commento alla Repubblica di Platone: Dissertazioni I, II–V, VII–XII, XIV–XV, XVII. Pavia: Bompiani.Google Scholar
Abbate, Michele. 2006. ‘Metaphysics and Theology as Methodological and Conceptual Paradigms in Proclus’ Ethico-Political Theory’. In Proklos: Methode, Seelenehre, Metaphysik, eds. Perkams, Matthias and Piccione, Rosa Maria, 186–200. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adam, James. 1891. The Nuptial Number of Plato: Its Solution and Significance. London: C.J. Clay and Sons.Google Scholar
Adam, James. 1902. The Republic of Plato. 2 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Allen, michael J. B. 2014. ‘Marsilio Ficino’. In Interpreting Proclus: From Antiquity to the Renaissance, ed. Gersh, Stephen, 353–79. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Allen, R.E. 1960. ‘Participation and Predication in Plato’s Middle Dialogues’. The Philosophical Review 69 (2): 147–64.Google Scholar
Annas, Julia. 1976. ‘Plato’s Republic and Feminism’. Philosophy 51 (197): 307–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, A. H. 1966–88. Plotinus: Enneads. 7 vols. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Asmis, Elizabeth. 1996. ‘The Stoics on Women’. In Feminism and Ancient Philosophy, ed. Ward, Julia K., 68–92. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Athanassiadi, Polymnia. 1999. Damascius: The Philosophical History: Text with Translation and Notes. Athens: Apamea Cultural Association.Google Scholar
Baloglou, George and Thomaidis, Yannis. (n.d.). ‘From Plato’s Rational Diameter to Proclus’ Elegant Theorem’. https://arxiv.org/abs/2011.07335.Google Scholar
Baltzly, Dirk. 1996. ‘To an Unhypothetical First Principle’. History of Philosophy Quarterly 13(2): 149–65.Google Scholar
Baltzly, Dirk. 1997. ‘Plato, Aristotle, and the Λόγος Ἐκ Τῶν Πρός Τι’. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 15: 177–206.Google Scholar
Baltzly, Dirk. 2004. ‘The Virtues and “Becoming Like God”: Alcinous to Proclus’. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 26: 297–322.Google Scholar
Baltzly, Dirk. 2006. ‘Pathways to Purification: The Cathartic Virtues in the Neoplatonic Commentary Tradition’. In Reading Plato in Antiquity, eds. Tarrant, Harold and Baltzly, Dirk, 169–84. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Baltzly, Dirk. 2008. ‘Mereological Modes of Being in Proclus’. Ancient Philosophy 26 (2): 395–412.Google Scholar
Baltzly, Dirk. 2009 a. ‘Gaia Gets to Know Herself: Proclus on the World’s Self-Perception’. Phronesis: A Journal for Ancient Philosophy 54 (3): 261–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baltzly, Dirk. 2009b. Proclus: Commentary on Plato’s Timaeus, Vol. IV, Book 3, Part 2: Proclus on the World Soul. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Baltzly, Dirk. 2012. ‘Dialectic’. In The Continuum Companion to Plato, ed. Press, Gerald A., 159–61. London and New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Baltzly, Dirk. 2013. ‘Proclus and Theodore of Asine on Female Philosopher-Rulers: Patriarchy, Metempsychosis and Women in the Neoplatonic Commentary’. Ancient Philosophy 33 (2): 403–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baltzly, Dirk. 2015. ‘Two Aristotelian Puzzles about Planets and Their Neoplatonic Reception’. Aperion 48 (4): 1–19.Google Scholar
Baltzly, Dirk. 2018. ‘Amelius and Theodore of Asine’. In Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Plato in Antiquity, eds. Tarrant, Harold, Layne, Danielle A., Baltzly, Dirk, and Renaud, François, 381–99. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Baltzly, Dirk. forthcoming. ‘The Myth of Er and Female Guardians in Proclus’ Republic Commentary’. In Women and the Female in Neoplatonism, eds. Wilberding, James and Schultz, Jana. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Baltzly, Dirk, Finamore, John, and Miles, Graeme. 2018. Proclus: Commentary on Plato’s Republic, Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barker, andrew. 2007. The Science of Harmonics in Classical Greece. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barnes, Jonathan, ed. 1984. The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation. 2 vols. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Barney, Rachel, Brennan, Tad, and Brittain, Charles, eds. 2012. Plato and the Divided Self. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Beck, R. 2007. A Brief History of Ancient Astrology. Malden, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benson, Hugh H. 2006. ‘Plato’s Method of Dialectic’. In A Companion to Plato, ed. Benson, Hugh H., 85–99. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Berg, Robbert Van Den. 2000. ‘Towards the Paternal Harbor: Proclean Theurgy and the Contemplation of the Forms’. In Proclus et la Théologie Platonicienne, eds. Steel, Carlos and Segonds, A. Ph., 425–43. Leuven and Paris: Leuven University Press and Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Bezza, Giuseppe. 2005. ‘Per un lessico astrologico: Glossario dei termini tecnici dell’ Isagoge di Paolo d’Alessandria’. MHNH: Revista Internacional de Investigación sobre Magia y Astrología Antiguas 5: 277–306.Google Scholar
Bluestone, Natalie Harris. 1987. Women and the Ideal Society: Plato’s Republic and Modern Myths of Gender. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
Bobonich, Christopher. 2002. Plato’s Utopia Recast: His Later Ethics and Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Boll, Franz. 1903. Sphaera: Neue griechische Texte und Untersuchungen zur Geschichte der Sternbilder. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Brentlinger, John A. 1963. ‘The Divided Line and Plato’s “Theory of Intermediates”’. Phronesis 8 (2): 146–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brisson, Luc. 1987 ‘Amélius, sa vie, son oeuvre, sa doctrine, son style’. Aufstieg und Niedergang der Römischen Welt 36 (2): 793–860.Google Scholar
Brisson, Luc. 2002. Sexual Ambivalence: Androgyny and Hermaphroditism in Graeco-Roman Antiquity. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Burkert, Walter. 1972. Lore and Science in Ancient Pythagoreanism, trans. Minar, Edwin. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M.F. 1976. ‘Protagoras and Self-Refutation in Later Greek Philosophy’. Philosophical Review 85 (1): 44–69.Google Scholar
Byrd, Jeremy, and Byrd, Miriam. 2019. ‘Standing in the Vestibule: Proclus on Intermediates’. Ancient Philosophy 39 (2): 452–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, Amber D. 2010. ‘Embodied, Intelligent (?) Souls: Plants in Plato’s Timaeus’. Phronesis: A Journal for Ancient Philosophy 55 (4): 281–303.Google Scholar
Charles-Saget, Annick 1991. ‘Lire Proclus, lecteur du Sophiste’. In Études sur le Sophiste de Platon, eds. Aubenque, Pierre and Narcy, Michel. Naples: Bibliopolis.Google Scholar
Cleary, John. 2000. ‘Proclus’ Philosophy of Mathematics’. In La philosophie des mathématiques de l’antiquité tardive, eds. Bechtle, Gerald and O’Meara, Dominic J., 85–101. Fribourg: Editions Universitaires Fribourg Suisse.Google Scholar
Combès, Joseph. 1987. ‘Les trois monades du Philèbe selon Proclus’. In Proclus: Lecteur et interprète des anciens, eds. Pépin, Jean and Saffrey, Henri-Dominique, 177–90. Paris: Éditions du C.N.R.S.Google Scholar
Côté, Antoine. 2003. ‘Note on Syrianus’ Use of the Divided Line in His Commentary on Aristotle’s Metaphysics’. The Modern Schoolman 81 (1): 57–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crombie, I. M. 1962–3. An Examination of Plato’s Doctrines. 2 vols. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Crombie, I. M. 1964. Plato: The Midwife’s Apprentice. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Cross, Robert C., and Woozley, Anthony D.. 1964. Plato’s Republic: A Philosophical Commentary. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Cumont, Franz, and Broll, Frank et al., eds. 1898–1953. Catalogus Codicum Astrologorum Graecorum. Brussels.Google Scholar
Denniston, John d., and Dover, Kenneth J.. 1954. The Greek Particles. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Deslauriers, Marguerite. 2003. ‘Aristotle on the Virtues of Slaves and Women’. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 25: 13–31.Google Scholar
Deuse, Werner. 1973. Theodorus von Asine: Sammlung Der Testimonien Und Kommentar. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
D’hoine, Pieter. 2006. ‘Proclus and Syrianus on Ideas of Artefacts: A Test Case for Neoplatonic Hermeneutics’. In Proklos: Methode, Seelenlehre, Metaphysik, eds. Perkams, Matthias and Piccione, Rosa Maria, 279–302. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D’hoine, Pieter. 2017. ‘Platonic Forms and the Triad of Being, Life, and Intellect’. In All From One: A Guide to Proclus, eds. d’Hoine, Pieter and Martijn, Marije, 98–121. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
D’hoine, Pieter. 2018. ‘The Metaphysics of the “Divided Line” in Proclus: A Sample of Pythagorean Theology’. Journal of the History of Philosophy 56 (4): 575–99.Google Scholar
Diès, Auguste. 1936. Le nombre de Platon: Essai d’exégèse et d’histoire. Paris: Imprimerie nationale.Google Scholar
Dillon, John. 2012. ‘The Letters of Iamblichus: Popular Philosophy in a Neoplatonic Mode’. In Iamblichus and the Foundations of Late Platonism, eds. Afonasin, Eugene, Dillon, John, and Finamore, John F., 51–62. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dillon, John M., and Polleichtner, Wolfgang, ed. and trans. 2009. Iamblichus of Chalcis: The Letters. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature.Google Scholar
D’ooge, Martin Luther. 1926. Nicomachus of Gerasa: Introduction to Arithmetic. New York and London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Dover, Kenneth J. 1974. Greek Popular Morality in the Time of Plato and Aristotle. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Engel, David M. 2003. ‘Women’s Role in the Home and the State: Stoic Theory Reconsidered’. Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 101: 267–88. https://doi.org/10.2307/3658531.Google Scholar
Everson, Stephen. 2008. ‘Plato’s Epistemology’. In The Oxford Handbook of Plato, ed. Fine, Gail, 165–90. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ferrari, G.R.F. 2007. ‘The Three-Part Soul’. In The Cambridge Companion to Plato, ed. Ferrari, G.R.F., 165–201. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Festugière, André-Jean. 1970. Proclus: Commentaire sur La République, trans. Festugière, André-Jean. 3 vols. Biblothèque des Textes Philosophiques. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Finamore, John F. 1985. Iamblichus and the Theory of the Vehicle of the Soul. Chico, Calif.: Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Finamore, John F. (2020). ‘Proclus and the Conjunction of Soul and Body’. In Lovers of the Soul, Lovers of the Body, eds. Griffin, Svetla S. and Ramelli, Ilaria. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Finamore, John F. (forthcoming). ‘Proclus Interprets Hesiod: The Procline Philosophy of the Soul’. In Rappe, Sara, Addey, Crystal, and Layne, Danielle A., Soul Matters in Plato and the Platonic Tradition. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature Press.Google Scholar
Fine, Gail. 1978. ‘Knowledge and Belief in Republic V’. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 60 (2): 121–39.Google Scholar
Folch, Marcus. 2015. The City and the Stage: Performance, Genre and Gender in Plato’s Laws. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Frommhold, Katrin. 2004. Die Bedeutung und Berechnung der Empfängnis in der Astrologie der Antike. Münster: Aschendorff.Google Scholar
Gerson, Lloyd P. 2003. Knowing Persons: A Study in Plato. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gerson, Lloyd P., Boys-Stones, George R., Dillon, John M., King, R.A.H., Smith, Andrew, and Wilberding, James. 2017. Plotinus: The Enneads. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Greenbaum, Dorian Gieseler. 2018. ‘Porphyry of Tyre on the Daimon, Birth and the Stars’. In Neoplatonic Demons and Angels, eds. Brisson, Luc, O’Neil, Seamus, and Timotin, Andrei, 102–39. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, Michael. 2012. ‘Proclus on Place as the Luminous Vehicle of the Soul’. Dionysius 30: 161–86.Google Scholar
Harari, Orna. 2006. ‘Methexis and Geometrical Reasoning in Proclus’ Commentary on Euclid’s Elements’. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 30: 361–89.Google Scholar
Harry, Chelsea, and Polansky, Ron. 2016. ‘Plato on Women’s Natural Ability: Revisiting Republic V and Timaeus 41e3–44d2 and 86b1–92c3’. Aperion 20 (1): 261–80.Google Scholar
Heath, Sir Thomas. 1921. A History of Greek Mathematics. 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Helmig, Christoph. 2013. Forms and Concepts: Concept Formation in the Platonic Tradition. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Helmig, Christoph. 2017. ‘Proclus on Epistemology, Language and Logic’. In All From One: A Guide to Proclus, eds. d’Hoine, Pieter and Martijn, Marije, 183–206. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Herz-Fischler, Roger. 1998. A Mathematical History of the Golden Number. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
Huffman, Carl. 2007. ‘Philolaus and the Central Fire’. In Reading Ancient Texts vol. I: Presocratics and Plato, eds. Stern-Gillet, S. and Corrigan, K., 57–96. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Hunter, Richard. 2012. Plato and the Traditions of Ancient Literature: The Silent Stream. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Irwin, Terence H. 1980. ‘The Metaphysical and Psychological Basis of Aristotle’s Ethics’. In Essays on Aristotle’s Ethics, ed. Rorty, Amelie, 35–53. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kosman, Aryeh. 2007. ‘Justice and Virtue: The Republic’s Inquiry into Proper Difference’. In The Cambridge Companion to Plato’s Republic, ed. Ferrari, G.R.F.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kroll, Wilhelm. 1899. Procli Diadochi in Platonis Rem Publicam Commentarii. 2 vols. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Knorr, Wilbur. 1998. ‘“Rational Diameters” and the Discovery of Incommensurability’. The American Mathematical Monthly 105 (5): 421–9.Google Scholar
Lane, E.N. 1990. ‘Men: A Neglected Cult of Roman Asia Minor’. In Aufstieg und Niedergang der Römischen Welt II 18.3: 2161–74.Google Scholar
Layne, Danielle. 2021. ‘Feminine Power in Proclus’ Commentary on Plato’s Timaeus.’ Hypatia 36 (1): 120–44. doi: 10.1017/hyp.2020.48.Google Scholar
Leemans, E. A. 1937. Studie over den Wijsgeer Numenius van Apamea met Uitgave der Fragmenten. North-Holland: Brussels.Google Scholar
Lernoud, Alain. 2000. ‘Mathématiques et physique chez Proclus: L’interprétation proclienne de la notion de “lien” en Timée 31b–32c’. In La Philosophie des Mathématiques de l’Antiquité Tardive, eds. Bechtle, Gerald and O’Meara, Dominic J., 129–47. Fribourg: Editions Universitaires Fribourg Suisse.Google Scholar
Lernoud, Alain. 2011. ‘Le statut ontologique des objets géométriques dans l’In Euclidem de Proclus’. Études Platoniciennes 8: 119–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leslie, Sarah-Jane, Cimpian, Andrei, and Meyer, Meredith. 2015. ‘Expectations of Brilliance Underlie Gender Distributions Across Academic Disciplines’. Science 347 (6219): 262–5. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1261375.Google Scholar
Lewy, Hans and Tardieu, Michel. 1978. Chaldaean Oracles and Theurgy: Mysticism, Magic and Platonism in the later Roman Empire, avec un supplement “Les Oracles chaldaïques 1891–2011” (3rd ed.). Paris: Études Augustiniennes.Google Scholar
Longo, Angela. 2002. ‘Gli argomenti di Teodoro di Asine sull’ educazione comune di uomini e donne nel “Commento alla Repubblica” di Proclo (I253–5 Kroll)’. Elenchos 23 (1): 51–73.Google Scholar
Lucarini, Carlo M., and Moreschini, Claudio. 2012. Hermias Alexandrinus: In Platonis Phaedrum Scholia. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Macisaac, D. Gregory. 2009. ‘The Soul and the Virtues in Proclus’ Commentary on the Republic of Plato’. Philosophie Antique 9: 115–43.Google Scholar
Macisaac, D. Gregory. 2014. ‘Geometrical First Principles in Proclus’ Commentary on the First Book of Euclid’s Elements’. Phronesis 59 (1): 44–98.Google Scholar
Majercik, Ruth 2001. ‘Chaldean Triads in Neoplatonic Exegesis: Some Reconsiderations’. Classical Quarterly 51 (1): 265–96.Google Scholar
Marzillo, Patricia. 2010. Der Kommentar des Proklos zu Hesiods ‘Werken und Tagen’: Edition, Übersetzung und Erläuterung der Fragmente. Tübingen: Narr Verlag.Google Scholar
Meisner, Dwayne A. 2018. Orphic Tradition and the Birth of the Gods. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendell, Henry. (n.d.) ‘Simplicius and Geminus on Early Greek Astronomy and Testimonia (including Proclus) for Sosigenes (2nd century C.E.) on Astronomy’. From the website Vignettes of Ancient Mathematics. https://web.calstatela.edu/faculty/hmendel/Ancient%20Mathematics/VignettesAncientMath.html.Google Scholar
Morrow, Glenn R. 1970. Proclus: Commentary on the 1st Book of Euclid’s Elements. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mueller, Ian. 1987. ‘Iamblichus and Proclus’ Euclid Commentary’. Hermes 115 (3): 334–48.Google Scholar
Mueller, Ian. 2000. ‘Proclus’ Philosophy of Mathematics’. In La Philosophie des Mathématiques de l’Antiquité Tardive, eds. Bechtle, Gerald and O’Meara, Dominic J., 85–101. Fribourg: Editions Universitaires Fribourg Suisse.Google Scholar
Mueller, Ian. 2006. ‘Alexander of Aphrodisias: On Aristotle Prior Analytics 1.23–31’. In Ancient Commentators on Aristotle, ed. Richard Sorabji. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Murphy, Neville R. 1951. The Interpretation of Plato’s Republic. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Nikulin, Dimitri. 2002. Matter, Imagination and Geometry: Ontology, Natural Philosophy and Mathematics in Plotinus, Proclus and Descartes. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Nikulin, Dimitri. 2008. ‘Imagination and Mathematics in Proclus’. Ancient Philosophy 28 (1): 153–72.Google Scholar
Neugebauer, Otto. 1963. ‘Decem Tulerunt Fastidia Menses’. The American Journal of Philology 84 (1): 64–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nock, Arthur D. 1972. ‘Studies in Graeco-Roman Beliefs of the Empire’. In Essays on Religion and the Ancient World, ed. Stewart, Zeph. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
O’meara, Dominic J. 1989. Pythagoras Revived. Mathematics and Philosophy in Late Antiquity. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
O’meara, Dominic J. 2003. Platonopolis: Platonic Political Philosophy in Late Antiquity. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
O’meara, Dominic J. 2017. ‘Mathematics and the Sciences’. In All from One: A Guide to Proclus, eds. d’Hoine, Pieter and Martijn, Marije, 167–82. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Opsomer, Jan. 2006. ‘Was sind irrationale Seelen?’ In Proklos. Methode, Seelenlehre, Metaphysik, eds. Matthias, Perkams and Piccione, Rosa Maria, 136–66. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Pappas, Nickolas. 1995. Plato and the Republic, eds. Crane, Tim and Wolff, Jonathan. 2nd ed. Routledge Philosophy Guidebooks. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Parker, Holt. 2009. ‘Greek Embryological Calendars and a Fragment from the Lost Work of Damastes, on the Care of Pregnant Women and of Infants’. The Classical Quarterly 49 (2): 515–34.Google Scholar
Pass, David B. 2017. ‘Gender, Virtue and Paideia: Proclus’ Interpretation of Plato’s Proposal’. Ancient Philosophy 37: 407–37.Google Scholar
Perkams, Matthias. 2006. ‘An Innovation by Proclus: The Theory of the Substantial Diversity of the Human Soul.’ In Proklos: Methode, Seelenlehre, Metaphysik, eds. Perkams, Matthias and Piccione, Rosa Maria, 167–85. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petty, Robert. 2012. Fragments of Numenius of Apamea. Translation and Commentary, Platonic Texts and Translations Series. Marsh, Dilton, Wiltshire: The Prometheus Trust.Google Scholar
Pomeroy, Sarah B. 2013. Pythagorean Women: Their History and Writings. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Press, Gerald A., ed. 2012. The Continuum Companion to Plato. London and New York: Continuum International.Google Scholar
Remes, Pauliina. 2008. Neoplatonism. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Roche, Timothy. 1988. ‘On the Alleged Metaphysical Foundation of Aristotle’s Ethics’. Ancient Philosophy 8 (1): 49–62.Google Scholar
Roskam, Geert. 2014. ‘Socratic Love in Neoplatonism’. In The Neoplatonic Socrates, eds. Layne, Danielle A. and Tarrant, Harold, 21–35. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Runia, David, and Share, Michael. 2008. Proclus: Commentary on Plato’s Timaeus. Vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schmitz, Markus. 2000. ‘Euklids Parallelenlehre als einzig wahre Geometrie der Ebene vor dem Hintergrund der Mathematikphilosophie des Proklos’. In La Philosophie des Mathématiques de l’Antiquité Tardive, eds. Bechtle, Gerald and O’Meara, Dominic J., 103–28. Fribourg: Editions Universitairses Fribourg Suisse.Google Scholar
Schultz, Jana. 2018. ‘Conceptualizing the “Female” Soul: A Study in Plato and Proclus’. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 27 (5): 883–901. https://doi.org/10.1080/09608788.2018.1551779.Google Scholar
Sheppard, Anne. 2013. ‘Proclus’ Place in the Reception of Plato’s Republic’. In Ancient Approaches to Plato’s Republic, ed. Sheppard, Anne. London: Institute of Classical Studies.Google Scholar
Silverman, Allan. 2002. The Dialectic of Essence. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sommaruga, Giovanni. 2000. ‘The Nature of Mathematical Objects in Proclus and in Contemporary Philosophy of Mathematics’. In La Philosophie des Mathématiques de l’Antiquité Tardive, eds. Bechtle, Gerald and O’Meara, Dominic J., 195–211. Fribourg: Editions Universitaires Fribourg Suisse.Google Scholar
Sorabji, Richard. 1988. Matter, Space and Motion: Theories in Antiquity and their Sequel. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Sorabji, Richard. 2000. Emotion and Peace of Mind: From Stoic Agitation to Christian Temptation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Sorabji, Richard. 2005. The Philosophy of the Commentators: Vol. 1: Psychology (with Ethics and Religion). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Staden, Heinrich Von. 1989. Herophilus: The Art of Medicine in Early Alexandria. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stalley, R.F. 1975. ‘Plato’s Argument for the Division of the Reasoning and Appetitive Elements within the Soul’. Phronesis 20 (2): 110–28.Google Scholar
Steel, Carlos. 1978. The Changing Self: A Study of the Soul in Later Neoplatonism: Iamblichus, Damascius and Priscianus. Brussels: Koninklijke Academie Wetenschappen, Letteren en Schone Kunsten van Belgie.Google Scholar
Steel, Carlos. 1997. ‘Proclus et l’lnterprétation ‘Logique’ du Parménide’. In Néoplatonisme et Philosophie Médiévale, ed. Benakis, Linos G., 67–92. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
Taormina, Daniela P. 2000. ‘Procédures de l’évidence dans la Théologie Platonicienne’. In Proclus et la Théologie Platonicienne, eds. Segonds, A. Ph. and Steel, Carlos, 29–46. Leuven and Paris: Leuven University Press and Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Taormina, Daniela P., and Piccione, Rosa Maria, eds. and trans. 2011. Geamblico: I Frammenti dalle Epistole. Naples: Bibliopolis.Google Scholar
Tarán, Leonardo. 1987. ‘Proclus on the Old Academy’. In Proclus. Lecteur et Interprète des Anciens, eds. Pépin, Jean and Saffrey, Henri-Dominique. Paris: Éditions du C.N.R.S.Google Scholar
Tarrant, Harold. 2017. Proclus: Commentary on Plato’s Timaeus Vol. VI. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, Ivor. 1939. Selections Illustrating the History of Greek Mathematics, vol. 1. (Loeb Classical Library). Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Van Riel, Gerd. 2000. Pleasure and the Good Life: Plato, Aristotle and the Neoplatonists. Philosophia Antiqua vol. 85. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Van Riel, Gerd. 2009. ‘Proclus on Matter and Physical Necessity’. In Physics and Philosophy of Nature in Greek Neoplatonism, eds. Chiaradonna, Riccardo and Trabattoni, Franco. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Van Riel, Gerd. 2017. ‘The One, the Henads, and the Principles’. In All From One: A Guide to Proclus, eds. d’Hoine, Pieter and Martijn, Marije, 73–97. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vedova, G. C. 1951. ‘Notes on Theon of Smyrna’. The American Mathematical Monthly 58 (10): 675–83.Google Scholar
Vlad, Marilena. 2017. ‘Stepping into the Void: Proclus and Damascius on Approaching the First Principle’. International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 11: 44–68.Google Scholar
Westerink, L.G. 1982. Damascius: Lectures on the Philebus Wrongly Attributed to Olympiodorus. Amsterdam: Adolf M. Hakkert. Repr. Westbury, Wiltshire: The Prometheus Trust 2010.Google Scholar
Wilberding, James 2017. Forms, Souls and Embryos: Neoplatonists on Human Reproduction. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Zlatev, B. 2016. ‘On the Value and Meaning of Proclus’ Perfect Year’. Mediterranean Archaeology and Archaeometry 16 (4): 191–4.Google Scholar