Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Table of conventions and international documents
- Table of constitutions and statutes
- Table of cases
- Introduction
- Part I Constitutional rights: scope and limitations
- Part II Proportionality: sources, nature, function
- Part III The components of proportionality
- Part IV Proportionality evaluated
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Table of conventions and international documents
- Table of constitutions and statutes
- Table of cases
- Introduction
- Part I Constitutional rights: scope and limitations
- Part II Proportionality: sources, nature, function
- Part III The components of proportionality
- Part IV Proportionality evaluated
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- ProportionalityConstitutional Rights and their Limitations, pp. 548 - 592Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2012
References
Cost-Benefit Analysis: Legal, Economic and Philosophical PerspectivesUniversity of Chicago Press 2000
Expounding the Constitution: Essays in Constitutional TheoryCambridge University Press 2008
2011
Of Living Trees and Dead Hands: The Interpretation of Constitutions and Constitutional Rights 22 Can. J. L. & Juris227 2009Google Scholar
2011
A Theory of Constitutional RightsOxford University Press 2002
RightsNew York University Press 1992
Reasonableness and LawDordrechtSpringer 2009
Law, Rights, and Discourse: The Legal Philosophy of Robert AlexyPortland, ORHart Publishing 2007
The Concept of Coherence and Its Significance for Discursive Rationality 3 Ratio Juris130 1990Google Scholar
The Unity of Public LawPortland, ORHart Publishing 2004
Constitutional Justice: A Liberal Theory of the Rule of LawOxford University Press 2001
Human Rights and Judicial Review: A Critique of ‘Due Deference’ 65 Cambridge L. J.671 2006Google Scholar
Legislative Supremacy and Legislative Intention: Interpretation, Meaning, and Authority 63 Cambridge L. J.685 2004Google Scholar
Courts of Final Jurisdiction: The Mason Court in AustraliaSydneyFederation Press 1996
Fuller’s Analysis of Polycentric Disputes and the Limits of Adjudication 53 Cambridge L. J.367 1994Google Scholar
European Public LawPortland, ORHart Publishing 1998
The Creation and Amendment of Constitutional NormsBIICL 2000
Proportionality and Federalism: Can Australia Learn from the European Community, the US and Canada? 26 U. Tas. L. Rev1 2007Google Scholar
The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine and the Principle of Proportionality in the Jurisprudence of the ECHROxfordHart Publishing 2002
Limitations on Legislative Override under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms: A Matter of Balancing Values 21 Osgoode Hall L. J.113 1983Google Scholar
A Wobbly Balance – A Comparison of Proportionality Testing in Canada, the United States, the European Union and the World Trade Organization 56 University of New Brunswick L. J.260 2007Google Scholar
Traité de Droit Constitutionnel SuisseNeuchatel, SwitzerlandEditions Ides et Calendes 1967
Theory of Legal PrinciplesDordrechtSpringer 2007
Don’t Tell, Don’t Ask: Narrow Tailoring after Grutter and Gratz 85 Tex. L. Rev517 2007Google Scholar
‘Original Intent’ in Historical Perspective: Some Critical Glosses 69 Tex. L. Rev1001 1991Google Scholar
Social Science Evidence and the Federal Constitutional Court of West Germany 23 J. of Politics421 1961Google Scholar
Judges in Contemporary Democracy: An International ConversationNew York University Press 2004
Proportional, Not Strict, Scrutiny: Against a US ‘Suspect Classifications’ Model under Article 14 ECHR in the UK 56 Am. J. Comp. L847 2008Google Scholar
The Limitation of Human Rights in Comparative Constitutional LawMontrealLes Editions Yvon Blais 1986
Human Rights in Private LawPortland, ORHart Publishing 2001
Interpretation in Law: Constitutional InterpretationJerusalemNevo 1994
Judicial DiscretionNew Haven, CTYale University Press 1989
Purposive Interpretation in LawPrinceton University Press 2006
The Judge in a DemocracyPrinceton University Press 2006
The Role of a Supreme Court in a Democracy, and the Fight Against Terrorism 58 U. Miami L. Rev125 2003Google Scholar
2011
2011
Exploring Social Rights: Between Theory and PracticePortland, ORHart Publishing 2007
On What the Constitution MeansBaltimore, MDJohns Hopkins University Press 1984
Constitutional Interpretation: The Basic QuestionsNew York:Oxford University Press 2007
Freedom of SpeechOxford University Press 2007
Constitutionalisation of Private LawOegstgeest, The NetherlandsBrill 2006
Introducción a la Jurisprudencia Constitucional Sobre el Principio de Proporcionalidad en el Ambito de los Derechos y Libertades 5 CDP333 1998Google Scholar
Constitutional Principles in EuropeSocietas Iuris Publici, Europaei, Fourth Congress, Göttingen 2008
Human Rights and Judicial Review: A Comparative PerspectiveMartinus Nijhoff Publishers 1994
The Ultimate Rule of LawOxford University Press 2004
Political Constitutionalism: A Republican Defense of the Constitutionality of DemocracyCambridge University Press 2007
Burdens of Pleading and Proof in Discrimination Cases: Toward a Theory of Procedural Justice 34 Vand. L. Rev1205 1981Google Scholar
‘Mere’ Rationality in Constitutional Law: Judicial Review and Democratic Theory 67 Cal. L. Rev1049 1979Google Scholar
Statutory Interpretation: A CodeLondon:Butterworths 2002
The Least Dangerous Breach: The Supreme Court at the Bar of PoliticsIndianapolis, INBobbs-Merrill 1962
Widening Horizons: The Influence of Comparative Law and International Law on Domestic LawCambridge University Press 2010
Law, Language, and Legal DeterminacyOxford University Press 1993
The Rechtsstaat Idea Compared with the Rule of Law as a Paradigm for Protecting Rights 107 S. African L. J.76 1990Google Scholar
The Balancing of Interest with Reference to the Principle of Proportionality and the Doctrine of Guterabwagung – A Comparative Analysis 14 SAPL178 1999Google Scholar
The Criteria of Justification under Oakes: Too Much Severity Generated Through Formalism 20 Man. L. J.437 1991Google Scholar
Structure and Relationship in Constitutional LawBaton Rouge, LALouisiana State University Press 1969
Commentaries on the Laws of EnglandOxfordClarendon Press 1765
The Limitations of Human Rights in Comparative Constitutional LawMontreal:Les Editions Yvon Blais 1986
Categoricalism and Balancing in First and Second Amendment Analysis 84 N. Y. U. L. Rev375 2009Google Scholar
Reasonableness and LawDordrecht:Springer 2009
State, Society and Liberty: Studies in Political Theory and Constitutional LawNew York:Berg Publishing Ltd. 1991
The Tolerant SocietyOxford University Press 1986
Balancing, the Global and the Local: Judicial Balancing as a Problematic Topic in Comparative (Constitutional) Law 31 Hastings Int’l & Comp. L. Rev555 2008Google Scholar
The Tragedy of Ms Evans: Conflicts and Incom mensurability of Rights 2 Eur. Const. L. Rev424 2006Google Scholar
The Tempting of America: The Political Seduction of the LawNew York:Touchstone 1990
2009
The Legitimacy of Legal Orders (3): Rethinking the Rule of Law 64 Tydskrif vir Hedendaagse Romeins-Hollandse Reg523 2001Google Scholar
The Future of Liberal Democracies in a Time of Terror: A Comparison of the Impact on Civil Liberties in the Federal Republic of Germany and the United States 11 Tulsa J. Comp. & Int’l L111 2003Google Scholar
Barbarians at the Gates: A Post-September 11th Proposal to Rationalize the Laws of War 73 Miss. L. J.639 2004Google Scholar
Los Límites a los Derechos FundamentalesMadridDykinson 2004
Conflicting Human Rights: An Exploration in the Context of the Right to a Fair Trial in the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms 27 Hum. Rts. Q294 2005Google Scholar
The Constitution of the United States: Contemporary Ratification 27 Tex. L. Rev433 1986Google Scholar
Palmer v. Thompson: An Approach to the Problem of Unconstitutional Legislative MotiveSup. Ct. Rev95 1971Google Scholar
Judicial Review in Comparative LawCambridge University Press 1989
Conflicts between Fundamental RightsMortsel, BelgiumIntersentia 2008
Making Our Democracy Work: A Judge’s ViewKnopf 2010
Contemporary Perspectives on Constitutional InterpretationWestview Press 1993
Constitutional GoodsOxford University Press 2004
May Government Ever Use Torture? Two Responses from German Law 48 Am. J. Comp. L661 2000Google Scholar
Originalism: A Quarter-Century of DebateRegnery Publishing 2007
Die Feststellung von Lücken im Gesetz: Eine Methodologische Studie über Voraussetzungen und Grenzen der richterlichen Rechtsfortbildung Praeter LegemBerlin:Duncker und Humblot 1983
1994
The Role of Proportionality in the Law of International Countermeasures 12 Eur. J. Int’l. L889 2001Google Scholar
The Law-Making Power of the Judge and Its Limits: A Comparative Analysis 8 Monash U. L. Rev15 1981Google Scholar
El Principio de Proporcionalidad en la Interpretación JurídicaSantiago: UNAM & CECOCH 2010
El Principio de Proporcionalidad y Protección de los Derechos Fundamentales [Proportionality Analysis and the Protection of Fundamental RightsMexico City; Comisión Nacional de los Derechos Humanos 2008
El Principio de Proporcionalidad en el Derecho ContemporáneoLima: Palestra Editores 2010
The Growth of the LawNew Haven, CTYale University Press 1924
The Nature of the Judicial ProcessWhitefish, MTKessinger Publishing LLC 1921
The Paradoxes of Legal ScienceNew YorkColumbia University Press 1928
Constitutional Law in IrelandDublin:Round Hall Press 2000
The Rule of Law in AmericaBaltimore, MDJohns Hopkins University Press 2001
Polémicas ConstitucionalesBogotaLegis 2007
Incommensurability, Incomparability, and Practical ReasonCambridge, MAHarvard University Press 1997
2002
South African Constitutional Law: The Bill of RightsCape Town:Juta Law Publishers 2002
2002
Constitutional Law: Principles and PoliciesAspen Publishers 2006
Globalization in Search of Justification: Toward a Theory of Comparative Constitutional Interpretation 74 Ind. L. J.819 1999Google Scholar
So What Is the Real Legacy of Oakes? Two Decades of Proportionality Analysis under the Canadian Charter’s Section 1” 34 Sup. Ct. L. Rev501 2006Google Scholar
The Migration of Constitutional IdeasCambridge University Press 2006
Is the Supreme Court Disproportionately Applying the Proportionality Principle? 8 SCC (J)33 2004Google Scholar
The Principle of Proportionality: The Challenges of Human Rights 3 J. Civ. L. Stud177 2010Google Scholar
Judicial Deference and Democratic Dialogue: The Legitimacy of Judicial Intervention under the Human Rights Act 1998PL33 2004Google Scholar
Regarding a Sense of Proportion: The Human Rights Act and the Proportionality Principle 5 Eur. Hum. Rts. L. Rev504 2001Google Scholar
El Examen de Proporcionalidad en el Derecho ConstitucionalBuenos Aires: Eudeba 2009
Original Understanding, Legal Realism, and the Interpretation of ‘This Constitution’ 72 Iowa L. Rev1177 1987Google Scholar
Legal Transplant Chronicles: The Evolution of Unreasonableness and Proportionality Review of the Administration in the United Kingdom 58 Am. J. Comp. L583 2010Google Scholar
The Boundaries of Liberty and Tolerance: The Struggle against Kahanism in IsraelGainesville, FLUniversity Press of Florida 1994
The Scope of Tolerance: Studies on the Costs of Free Expression and Freedom of the PressLondon:Routledge 2006
Hebrew University of Jerusalem 2000
American Balancing and German Proportionality: The Historical Origins 8 Int’l J. Const. L.263 2010Google Scholar
The Hidden Foreign Law Debate in Heller: The Proportionality Approach in American Constitutional Law 46 San Diego L. Rev367 2009Google Scholar
Probability Thresholds as Deontological Constraints in Global Constitutionalism 49 Colum. J. Transnat’l L102 2010Google Scholar
Interesse Público, Proporcionalidade e Mérito: Relevância e Autonomia Processual do Principio da ProporcionalidadeEstudos em Homenagem a Professora Doutora Isabel de Magalhães Collaço 539 2002Google Scholar
The Poverty of Posner’s Pragmatism: Balancing Away Liberty after 9/11 59 Stan. L. Rev1735 2007Google Scholar
Law and Interpretation: Essays in Legal PhilosophyOxford University Press 1995
Section 1, Contextuality, and the Anti-Disadvantage Principle 42 U. Toronto L. J.77 1992Google Scholar
Defining Civil and Political Rights: The Jurisprudence of the United Nations Human Rights CommitteeFarnham, UKAshgate Publishing 2009
Law and EconomicsReading, MAAddison Wesley 2003
Inside and Outside Canadian Administrative Law: Essays in Honour of David MullanUniversity of Toronto Press 2006
Without Deference, With Respect: A Response to Justice O’Regan 121 S. Afr. L. J438 2004Google Scholar
The Rule of Law: History, Theory and CriticismSpringer Publishing 2007
Human Rights and Constitutional Law: Essays in Honour of Brian WalshDublin:Round Hall Press 1992
Administrative LawLondon:Sweet & Maxwell 2008
The Unity of Public LawPortland, ORHart Publishing 2004
The Principle of Proportionality in the Laws of EuropePortland, ORHart Publishing 1999
The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: A Perspective on Its DevelopmentOxford University Press 1995
How Do Courts Really Discover Unenumerated Fundamental Rights? Cataloging the Methods of Judicial Alchemy 19 Harv. J. L. & Pub. Pol’y795 1995Google Scholar
Judicial Methods of Interpretation of the LawNew Orleans:Louisiana State University Press 1981
The Constitution of the Federal Republic of GermanyUniversity of Chicago Press 1994
The Bill of Rights HandbookCape Town:Juta Law Publishers 2006
Rethinking the Rule of Law after CommunismCentral European University Press 2005
Incommensurability and Commensuration: The Common DenominatorAldershotAshgate Publishing 2003
Restrictions and Limitations on Human Rights3 Rene Cassin Amicorum Discipulorumque Liber79 1969Google Scholar
On DemocracyNew Haven, CTYale University Press 1998
Charter Section 1: The Decline of Grand Unified Theory and the Trend Towards Deference in the Supreme Court of Canada 15 Advocates’ Quarterly289 1993Google Scholar
Separating Minimal Impairment from Balancing: A Comment on R. v. Sharpe 5 Rev. Const. Stud195 2000Google Scholar
Magna CartaLondon:Trustees of the British Museum 1963
Discretionary Justice: A Preliminary InquiryBaton Rouge, LALouisiana State University Press 1969
Administrative Law TreatiseAspen Publishers 2002
Proportionality and Wednesbury Unreasonableness: The Influence of European Legal Concepts on UK Law 3 Eur. Public Law561 1997Google Scholar
The Influence of European Legal Concepts on UK Law: Proportionality and Wednesbury Unreasonableness 3 Eur. Public Law561 1993Google Scholar
The Principle of Proportionality and Its Application in EC Law 13 Y. B. Eur. L105 1993Google Scholar
2007
Judicial Transformations: The Rights Revolution in the Courts of EuropeOxford University Press 2009
Comparing the Incommensurable: Constitutional Principles, Balancing, and Rational Decision 31 OJLS 2011Google Scholar
Deference as Respect and Deference as Sacrifice: A Reading of Bato Star Fishing v. Minister of Environmental Affairs 20 SAJHR577 2004Google Scholar
A Comparative Analysis of the Provisions of German Origin in the Interim Bill of Rights 11 SAJHR1 1995Google Scholar
Balancing Rights in a Democracy: The Problems with Limitations and Overrides of Rights under the Victorian Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act 2006 32 Melb. U. L. Rev422 2008Google Scholar
Parliamentary Sovereignty and Dialogue under the Victorian Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities: Drawing the Line Between Judicial Interpretation and Judicial Law-Making 33 Monash U. L. Rev9 2007Google Scholar
Judicial Review in an Age of Moral PluralismCambridge University Press 2009
The Interpretation and Application of StatutesBoston:Little Brown & Co. 1975
The Conduct of Hostilities under the Law of International Armed ConflictCambridge University Press 2004
War, Aggression and Self-DefenseCambridge University Press 2005
Jesting PilateBuffalo, NYWilliam S. Hein & Company 1965
The Supreme Court of Canada, Charter Dialogue, and Deference 47 Osgoode Hall L. J.235 2009Google Scholar
Integrating Normative and Descriptive Constitutional Theory: The Case of Original Meaning 85 Geo. L. J1765 1997Google Scholar
GG Grundgesetz KommentarTübingenMohr Siebeck 2006
Re-interpretation of StatutesDurbanButterworths 2002
2002
1978
Importing the Law in Post-Communist Transitions: The Hungarian Constitutional Court and the Right to Human DignityPortland, ORHart Publishing 2003
A Bill of Rights for BritainLondon:Chatto & Windus 1990
A Matter of PrincipleOxford University Press 1985
Freedom’s Law: The Moral Reading of the American ConstitutionCambridge, MA: Harvard University Press 1996
Is Democracy Possible Here?: Principles for a New Political DebatePrinceton University Press 2006
Theories of RightsOxford University Press 1984
Sovereign Virtue – The Theory and Practice of EqualityCambridge, MAHarvard University Press 2000
Taking Rights SeriouslyCambridge, MA: Harvard University Press 1977
Unenumerated Rights: Whether and How Roe Should Be Overruled 59 U. Chi. L. Rev381 1992Google Scholar
Expounding the Constitution: Essays in Constitutional TheoryCambridge University Press 2008
The Province of Administrative LawPortland, ORHart Publishing 1997
Dignity and Liberty: Constitutional Visions in Germany and the United StatesSanta Barbara, CAPraeger Publishers 2001
European and US ConstitutionalismGeorg Nolte ed 2005
Judges and Unjust Laws: Common Law Constitutionalism and the Foundations of Judicial ReviewAnn Arbor, MIUniversity of Michigan Press 2008
The Judicial Function and the Elusive Goal of Principled DecisionmakingWis. L. Rev837 1991Google Scholar
Disproportionate Impact and Illicit Motive: Theories of Constitutional Adjudication 52 N. Y. U. L. Rev36 1977Google Scholar
The European System for the Protection of Human RightsDordrecht:Kluwer Academic Publishers 1993
The Supreme Court of Canada and Section 1 – The Erosion of the Common Front 12 Queen’s L. J.277 1987Google Scholar
United Kingdom Bicameralism, Sovereignty, and the Unwritten Constitution 5 I. Con.370 2007Google Scholar
Democracy and Distrust: A Theory of Judicial ReviewCambridge, MAHarvard University Press 1980
Flag Desecration: A Case Study in the Roles of Categorization and Balancing in First Amendment Analysis 88 Harv. L. Rev1482 1975Google Scholar
Legislative and Administrative Motivation in Constitutional Law 79 Yale L. J.1205 1970Google Scholar
The System of Freedom of ExpressionLondon:Vintage Books 1970
The Principle of Proportionality in European Law: A Comparative StudyLondon:Kluwer Law International 1996
Corrective and Distributive Justice: From Aristotle to Modern TimesOxford University Press 2009
2000
Rights and Constitutionalism: The New South African Legal OrderOxford University Press 1994
Constitutionalism and Rights: The Influence of the United States Constitution AbroadColumbia University Press 1990
Dynamic Statutory InterpretationCambridge, MAHarvard University Press 1994
Constitutionalism and the Role of ParliamentsPortland, ORHart Publishing 2007
Madisonian Balancing: A Theory of Constitutional Adjudication 88 Nw. U. L. Rev641 1994Google Scholar
Implementing the ConstitutionCambridge, MAHarvard University Press 2001
Statutory Interpretation and the Balance of Power in the Administrative State 89 Colum. L. Rev452 1989Google Scholar
Successful Rational Basis Claims in the Supreme Court from the 1971 Term through Romer v. Evans 32 Ind. L. Rev357 1999Google Scholar
Constitutionalism and Rights: The Influence of the United States Constitution AbroadColumbia University Press 1990
The Principle of Proportionality in the Laws of EuropeOxford:Hart Publishing 1999
The Misuse of the Less Restrictive Alternative Inquiry in Rule of Reason Analysis 58 Am. U. L. Rev561 2009Google Scholar
Comparing Administrative Justice Across the CommonwealthCape Town:Juta Law Publishers 2006
2000
Constitutional Courts Democratic Values: A European PerspectiveNew Haven, CT, and LondonYale University Press 2009
The Rational Reconstruction of Weighing and Balancing on the Basis of Teleological-Evaluative Considerations in the Justification of Judicial Decisions 21 Ratio Juris481 2008Google Scholar
The Constitution and the Intention of the Framers: The Limits of Historical Analysis 50 U. Pitt. L. Rev349 1989Google Scholar
Intention Is All There Is: A Critical Analysis of Aharon Barak’s Purposive Interpretation in Law 29 Cardozo L. Rev1109 2008Google Scholar
Constitutional Dialogues: Interpretation as Political ProcessPrinceton University Press 1988
The Handbook of Humanitarian Law in Armed ConflictsOxford University Press 1999
Institutionen des Deutschen VerwaltungsrechtsTübingen 1928
Understanding Human Rights PrinciplesPortland, ORHart Publishing 2001
Administrative LawLondon:Butterworths 1995
Courts on Trial – Myth and Reality in American JusticePrinceton University Press 1949
Human Rights Transformed: Positive Rights and Positive DutiesOxford University Press 2008
Constitutional Democracy and the Legitimacy of Judicial Review 9 Law and Philosophy327 1990Google Scholar
Supreme Court and Supreme LawBloomington, INIndiana University Press 1954
1968
The Birth of an Academic Obsession: The History of the Countermajoritarian Difficulty, Part Five 112 Yale L. J.153 2002Google Scholar
The Counter-Majoritarian Problem and the Pathology of Constitutional Scholarship 95 Nw. U. L. Rev933 2001Google Scholar
Human Rights in Private LawHart Publishing 2001
University of Chicago 1991
Anatomy of the LawWestport, CTGreenwood Press 1968
The Morality of LawNew Haven, CTYale University Press 1969
Principio di Proporzionalita e Sindacato Giurisdizionale nel Diritto AdministrativoMilan 1998
Discretionary Powers: A Legal Study of Official DiscretionOxford:Clarendon Press 1986
Judicial Supremacy and Nonjudicial Interpretation of the Constitution 24 Hastings Const. L. Q.359 1997Google Scholar
Necessity, Proportionality and the Use of Force by StatesCambridge University Press 2004
Reassessing the New Commonwealth Model of Constitutionalism 8 Int’l. J. Const. L.167 2010Google Scholar
The Myth and the Reality of American Constitutional Exceptionalism 107 Mich. L. Rev.391 2008Google Scholar
General Limitations on Human Rights: The Principle of Legality 17 Harv. Int’l L. J.503 1976Google Scholar
Judicial Process: Constitutional Principles and LimitationsPortland, ORHart Publishing 2009
Hong Kong’s New Constitutional Order: The Resumption of Chinese Sovereignty and the Basic LawHong Kong University Press 1999
Le Contrôle de Proportionnalité Exercé par le Conseil Constitutionnel 22 Les Cahiers du Conseil Constitutionnel208 2007Google Scholar
The American Constitution and the Debate over OriginalismCambridge University Press 2005
Interpreting Constitutions: A Comparative StudyOxford University Press 2006
Judicial Review, Legislative Override and Democracy 38 Wake Forest L. Rev.451 2003
Parliamentary Sovereignty: Contemporary DebatesCambridge University Press 2010
Common Law TheoryCambridge University Press 2007
The Sovereignty of Parliament: History and PhilosophyOxford University Press 1999
Legal Interpretation in Democratic StatesFarnham, EnglandAshgate 2002
Compelling Governmental Interests: An Essential But Unanalyzed Term in Constitutional Adjudication 68 Boston University L. Rev.917 1988Google Scholar
Vorträge über Recht und StaatCologne:Westdeutscher Verlag 1960
New Challenges to the German Basic LawBaden-Baden:Nomos 1991
Judicial Review of Constitutional Amendments: A Comparative StudyBursa, TurkeyEkin Press 2008
Are Mental States Relevant for Statutory and Constitutional Interpretation? 85 Cornell L. Rev.1609 2000Google Scholar
1992
Law and ObjectivityOxford University Press 1992
Legal Interpretation: Perspectives from Other Disciplines and Private TextsOxford University Press 2010
Balancing’ and the European Court of Human Rights: A Contribution to the Habermas–Alexy Debate 63 Cambridge L. J.412 2004Google Scholar
Constitutionalizing Adjudication under the European Convention on Human Rights 23 OJLS405 2003Google Scholar
The European Convention on Human Rights: Achievements, Problems and ProspectsCambridge University Press 2006
Human Rights and Judicial Review: A Comparative PerspectiveDordrecht:Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 1994
Proportionality in Canadian and German Constitutional Jurisprudence 57 U. Toronto L. J.383 2007Google Scholar
European and US ConstitutionalismCambridge University Press 2005
Constitutionalism, Universalism and Democracy – A Comparative AnalysisBaden-Baden:Nomos 1999
In Search of Judicial Quality on a Changing Court: The Case of Justice Powell 24 Stan. L. Rev.1001 1972Google Scholar
The Supreme Court 1971 Term – Foreword: In Search of Evolving Doctrine on a Changing Court: A Model for a Newer Equal Protection 86 Harv. L. Rev.1 1972Google Scholar
International Human Rights: A Comprehensive IntroductionLondon:Routledge 2008
Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and DemocracyCambridge, MAMIT Press 1996
Schweizerisches BundesstaatsrechtZurichSchulthess 2008
2007
Taking ‘Rechts’ Seriously: Ronald Dworkin and the Federal Constitutional Court of Germany 9 German L. J.771 2008Google Scholar
Greater Good: The Case for ProportionalismWashington, DCGeorgetown University Press 1995
The Presumption of Innocence and Reverse Burdens: A Balancing Act 66 Cambridge L. J.142 2007Google Scholar
Rights-Based Judicial Review: A Democratic Justification 22 Law and Philosophy247 2003Google Scholar
Law, Liberty, and MoralityStanford University Press 1963
The Concept of LawOxfordClarendon Press 1994
Legal Institutions Today and Tomorrow: The Centennial Conference Volume of the Columbia Law SchoolColumbia University Press 1959
The Legal Process: Basic Problems in the Making and Application of LawFoundation Press 1958
The Logic of Constitutional RightsBurlington, VTAshgate Publishing Company 2005
The Public Interest and Individual InterestsBasic Books 1970
Customary International Humanitarian LawCambridge University Press 2005
Grundzüge des Verfassungrechts der Bundesrepublik DeutschlandHeidelbergC. F. Müller Verlag 1999
Free Speech and Human DignityNew Haven, CTYale University Press 2008
Constitutional Dialogue, Constitutional Theories and the Human Rights Act 1998PL306 2005Google Scholar
The Reasonableness Principle: Reassessing Its Place in the Public Sphere 63 Cambridge L. J.166 2004Google Scholar
Der Grundsatz Der VerhältnismäßigkeitGöttingen:Schwarz 1980
The New Constitutionalism and the Judicialization of Pure Politics Worldwide 75 Fordham L. Rev. 2006Google Scholar
Towards Juristocracy: The Origins and Consequences of the New ConstitutionalismCambridge, MAHarvard University Press 2004
The Future of Judicial Review in South African Administrative Law 117 S. Afr. L. J.484 2000Google Scholar
The Principle of Proportionality in the Laws of EuropePortland, ORHart Publishing 1999
Judicial Review: A Thematic ApproachDublin:Gill & Macmillan 1995
Administrative Law in IrelandDublin:Round Hall Press 1991
Constitutional Law of CanadaTorontoCarswell 1985
Constitutional Law of CanadaTorontoThomson Carswell 2007
Interpreting the Charter of Rights: Generosity and Justification 28 Osgoode Hall L. J.817 1990Google Scholar
The Charter Dialogue between Courts and Legislatures (Or Perhaps the Charter of Rights Isn’t Such a Bad Thing After All) 35 Osgoode Hall L. J.75 1997Google Scholar
Constitutional Rights and the Question of Waiver: How Fundamental Are Fundamental Rights? 16 SAPL122 2001Google Scholar
The Courts and Social PolicyWashington, DCBrookings Institution Press 1977
The Transformation of American Law: 1870–1960Oxford University Press 1992
The Limitation Clauses of the European Convention on Human Rights: A Guide for the Application of Section 1 of the Charter? 17 Ottawa L. Rev.213 1985Google Scholar
The Limitations Clauses of the European Convention on Human Rights and Freedoms and Section 1 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms: A Comparative Analysis 6 Y. B. Eur. L.105 1987Google Scholar
Public Law in a Multi-Layered ConstitutionPortland, ORHart Publishing 2003
Using Human Rights Law in English CourtsOxford: HartPublishing 1997
The Rule of Law: Ideal or Ideology?Toronto:Carswell 1987
‘Reconciling Rights’: The Supreme Court of Canada’s Approach to Competing Charter Rights 20 Sup. Ct. L. Rev.137 2003Google Scholar
Facing Judicial Discretion: Legal Knowledge and Right Answers RevisitedDordrecht:Springer 2001
Limiting Socio-Economic Rights: Beyond the Internal Limitations Clauses 20 SAJHR448 2004Google Scholar
Judicial Review of Reasonableness in Constitutional LawMadrasMadras Law Journal Office 1979
Comparative Judicial Review and Public PolicyGreenwood Press 1992
Ambivalent Resistance and Comparative Constitutionalism: Opening up the Conversation on “Proportionality,” Rights and Federalism 1 U. Pa. J. Const. L.583 1999Google Scholar
Constitutional Comparisons: Convergence, Resistance, Engagement 119 Harv. L. Rev.109 2005Google Scholar
Constitutional Engagement in a Transnational EraOxford University Press 2010
Comparative Constitutional LawFoundation Press 1999
The Limitations of Human Rights in Comparative Constitutional LawMontreal:Les Editions Yvon Blais 1986
Indian Constitutional LawHaryana, IndiaLexisNexis Butterworths Wadhwa 2003
Civil ProcedureFoundation Press 2001
2007 www.ssrn.com/abstract=1105341/
The Judicial Application of Human Rights Law: National, Regional and International JurisprudenceCambridge University Press 2002
Just War Tradition and the Restraint of WarPrinceton University Press 1981
Ideology, Reason, and the Limitation of War: Religious and Secular Concepts, 1200–1740Princeton University Press 1975
Constitutional and Administrative Law in New ZealandWellingtonBrooker’s 2007
The Demise of Ultra Vires – A Reply to Christopher Forsyth and Linda Whittle 8 Canterbury L. Rev.463 2002Google Scholar
The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: Cases, Materials and CommentaryOxford University Press 2004
Continuity and Change in EU Law: Essays in Honour of Sir Francis JacobsOxford University Press 2008
Law and Administration in Europe: Essays in Honour of Carol HarlowOxford University Press 2003
The European Court of Human Rights as a Developer of the General Doctrines of Human Rights Law: A Study of the Limitations Clauses of the European Convention on Human RightsTampere, FinlandTampereen yliopisto 2003
Freedom of Speech and Flag Desecration: A Comparative Study of German, European and United States Laws 20 Denv. J. Int’l L. & Pol’y471 1991Google Scholar
Private Speech, Public Purpose: The Role of Governmental Motive in First Amendment Doctrine 63 U. Chi. L. Rev.413 1996Google Scholar
The Notwithstanding Mechanism and Public Discussion: Lessons from the Ignored Practice of Section 33 of the Charter 43 Can. Public Admin.225 2001Google Scholar
What Makes for a Good Use of the Notwithstanding Mechanism? 23 Sup. Ct. L. Rev.191 2004Google Scholar
The Court, the Community and the Judicial Balance: The Jurisprudence of Justice Powell 97 Yale L. J.1 1987Google Scholar
The Headscarf as Threat: A Comparison of German and US Legal Discourses 40 Vand. J. Transnat’l L.417 2007Google Scholar
A Worthy Tradition: Freedom of Speech in AmericaCambridge University Press 1988
Conflicts of Rights: Typology, Methodology, and Noncon sequentialism 7 Legal Theory239 2001Google Scholar
The Process of Constitutional Interpretation: A Synthesis of the Present and a Guide to the Future 42 Rutgers L. Rev.983 1990Google Scholar
Criminal Law – Yanus of Human Rights: Constitutionalization and Basic Law: Human Dignity and Liberty 42 Hapraklit64 1995Google Scholar
The Constitution of the Federal Republic of GermanyBaden-Baden:Nomos 1988
Penumbras, Peripherals, Emanations, Things Fundamental and Things Forgotten: The Griswold Case 64 Mich. L. Rev.235 1965Google Scholar
Constitutional Review under the UK Human Rights ActCambridge University Press 2009
Expounding the Constitution – Essays in Constitutional TheoryCambridge University Press 2008
Burden of Proof and Related Issues: A Study on Evidence before International TribunalsLondon:Kluwer Law International 1996
2008
The Irish ConstitutionsDublin:Butterworths 2003
Styles of Constitutional Interpretation and the Four Main Approaches to Constitutional Interpretation in American Legal History 29 Valp. U. L. Rev.121 1994Google Scholar
Beyond Reasonableness – A Rigorous Standard of Review for Article 15 Infringement 50 J. Indian L. Ins.177 2008Google Scholar
2008
Second Guessing the Law-Makers: Social Science Research in Charter Litigation 19 Can. Pub. Pol’y379 1993Google Scholar
Constitutional Interpretation and Original Intent: A Form of Ancestor Worship24Melb. U. L. Rev. 2000Google Scholar
Constitutional Guarantees, Characterisation and the Concept of Proportionality 21 Melb. U. L. Rev.1 1997Google Scholar
Constitutional Implications (I): Nature, Legitimacy, Classification, Examples 24 Melb. U. L. Rev.645 2000Google Scholar
Constitutional Implications (II): Doctrines of Equality and Democracy 25 Melb. U. L. Rev.24 2001Google Scholar
The International Bill of Rights: The Covenant on Civil and Political RightsColumbia University Press 1981
Taking Rights Less Seriously: A Structural Analysis of Judicial Discretion 20 Ratio Juris506 2007Google Scholar
Constitutionalism, Universalism and Democracy – A Comparative Analysis: The German Contributions to the Fifth World Congress of the International Association of Constitutional LawBerlin:Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft 1999
The Burden of Proof in Comparative and International Human Rights LawLondon:Kluwer Law International 1998
Interpreting Constitutions: A Comparative StudyOxford University Press 2006
The Constitutional Jurisprudence of the Federal Republic of GermanyDurham, NCDuke University Press 1997
The Jurisprudence of Free Speech in the United States and the Federal Republic of Germany 53 S. Cal. L. Rev.657 1979Google Scholar
The Value of Comparative Constitutional Law 9 Marshall J. Practice & Procedure685 1976Google Scholar
Courts and Political Institutions: A Comparative ViewCambridge University Press 2003
Objectivity and the Rule of LawCambridge University Press 2007
Allocational Sanctions: The Problem of Negative Rights in a Positive State 132 U. Pa. L. Rev.1293 1984Google Scholar
A Companion to the Philosophy of Law and Legal TheoryWiley-Blackwell 1996
Democracy and Constitutionalism in India: A Study of the Basic Structure DoctrineOxford University Press 2009
A Comparative Perspective on the First Amendment: Free Speech, Militant Democracy, and the Primacy of Dignity as a Preferred Constitutional Value in Germany 78 Tul. L. Rev.1549 2004Google Scholar
2009
Law, Rights, and Discourse: The Legal Philosophy of Robert AlexyPortland, ORHart Publishing 2007
The Idea of Socratic Contestation and the Right to Justification: The Point of Rights-Based Proportionality Review 4 Law & Ethics Hum. Rts.140 2010Google Scholar
2006
Arguing Fundamental RightsDordrecht:Springer 2006
The Constitution in Private Relations: Expanding ConstitutionalismThe HagueEleven International Publishing 2005
The People Themselves: Popular Constitutionalism and Judicial ReviewOxford University Press 2006
The Rehnquist Court: A Retrospective (New York:Oxford University Press 2002
Debunking the Idea of Parliamentary Sovereignty: The Controlling Factor of Legality in the British Constitution 28 OJLS709 2008Google Scholar
Metaphors We Live ByUniversity of Chicago Press 1980
Judicial Policy-Making and Information Flow to the Supreme Court 29 Vand. L. Rev.45 1976Google Scholar
Canada’s Legal Revolution: Judging in the Age of the Charter of Rights 28 Isr. L. Rev.579 1994Google Scholar
Judicial Transformations: The Rights Revolution in the Courts of EuropeOxford University Press 2009
1993
The Golden Metwand and the Crooked Cord: Essays in Honour of Sir William Wade QCOxford University Press 1998
Notas Sobre o Princípio da Proporcionalidade ou da Proibição do Excesso 5 FDUP999 2001Google Scholar
Formalizing the Rule of Law in Prussia: The Supreme Administrative Law Court, 1876–1914Central European History 37 2004Google Scholar
Taking Rights Proportionately: Judicial Review, the Human Rights Act and StrasbourgPL265 2002Google Scholar
Human Rights Law and PracticeLondon:Butterworths 2004
A Theory of Interpretation of the European Convention on Human RightsOxford University Press 2009
Responding to Imperfection – The Theory and Practice of Constitutional AmendmentPrinceton University Press 1995
2002
The Rise and Fall of Doctrine under Section 1 of the Charter 24 Ottawa L. Rev.163 1992Google Scholar
Foundations of Public LawOxford University Press 2010
Incommensurable Values, Rational Choice, and Moral Absolutes 38 Clev. St. L. Rev.65 1990Google Scholar
1984
Les Notions à Contenu Variable en DroitBrussels:Emile Bruylant 1984
Questioning Sovereignty: Law, State and Nation in the European CommonwealthOxford University Press 1999
Interpreting Statutes: A Comparative StudyAldershot:Dartmouth 1991
Objectivity: Recovering Determinate Reality in Philosophy, Science, and Everyday LifeAldershot:Ashgate Publishing 2004
Main Principles of the German Basic LawBaden-BadenNomos Verlagsgesellschaft 1983
Jurisdictional Fact, Constitutional Fact and the Presumption of Constitutionality 11 Man. L. J.21 1981Google Scholar
Ancient LawLondon:John Murray 1861
Fundamental Rights in European Contract Law: A Comparison of the Impact of Fundamental Rights on Contractual Relationships in Germany, The Netherlands, Italy and EnglandAlphen aan den Rijn, The NetherlandsKluwer Law International 2008
Conflicts Between Fundamental RightsMortsel, BelgiumIntersentia 2008
Democracy and the Rule of LawCambridge University Press 2003
2007 www.venice.coe.int/docs/2007/CDL-JU(2007)017-e.pdf
Analyzing Law: New Essays in Legal TheoryOxford:Clarendon Press 1998
Law and Interpretation: Essays in Legal PhilosophyOxford University Press 1995
The Role of a Constitutional Court in a Federation: A Comparison of the Australian and the United States Experience 16 Fed. L. Rev.1 1986Google Scholar
Legal-Policy Decision Process: Alternative Thinking and the Predictive Function 33 Geo. Wash. L. Rev.318 1964Google Scholar
The Principle of Proportionality in the Laws of EuropePortland, ORHart Publishing 1999
A Common Law of Human Rights? Transnational Judicial Conversations on Constitutional Rights 20 OJLS499 2000Google Scholar
Law at the End of Life: The Supreme Court and Assisted SuicideAnn Arbor, MIUniversity of Michigan Press 2000
Reconciling Human Rights and the Public Interest: Conceptual Problems and Doctrinal Uncertainty in the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights 62 Mod. L. Rev.671 1999Google Scholar
Roscoe Pound’s Theory of Interests and the Furtherance of Western Civilization 41 Il Politico5 1976Google Scholar
The New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990AucklandLegal Research Foundation 1992
La Vinculación Negativa del Legislador a los Derechos FundamentalesMadridMcGraw-Hill 1996
On TolerationOxford University Press 1987
Why Courts Should Not Balance Rights against the Public Interest 31 Melb. U. L. Rev.873 2007Google Scholar
The Original Understanding of Original Intent: A Textual Analysis 26 Ohio N. U. L. Rev.201 2000Google Scholar
German Constitutional Law: The Protection of Civil LibertiesSudbury, MADartmouth Publishing Co. Ltd. 1999
Foreword: Traces of Self-Government – The Supreme Court 1985 Term 100 Harv. L. Rev.4 1986Google Scholar
Politics and Values or What’s Really Wrong with Rationality Review? 13 Creighton L. Rev.487 1979Google Scholar
European and US ConstitutionalismCambridge University Press 2005
2002
The Supreme Court, the Adversary System, and the Flow of Information to the Justices: A Preliminary Inquiry 61 Va. L. Rev.1187 1975Google Scholar
Beguiled by Metaphors: The ‘Living Tree’ and Originalist Constitutional Interpretation in Canada 22 Can. J. L. & Jurisprudence331 2009Google Scholar
Expounding the Constitution: Essays in Constitutional TheoryCambridge University Press 2008
Eye for an EyeCambridge University Press 2006
US National Security, Intelligence and DemocracyTaylor & Francis 2008
Resolving Cases of Conflicting Rights under the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 22 New Zealand U. L. Rev.50 2006Google Scholar
Two Conceptions of Positive Liberty: Towards an Autonomy-Based Theory of Constitutional Rights 29 OJLS757 2009Google Scholar
The Judicial Perspective in the Administrative State: Reconciling Modern Doctrines of Deference with the Judiciary’s Structural Role 53 Stan. L. Rev.1 2000Google Scholar
How Proportionate Should Anti-Competitive State Intervention Be?,” 28 Eur. L. Rev.112 2003Google Scholar
Rethinking the Reasonable Person: An Egalitarian Reconstruction of the Objective StandardOxford University Press 2003
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Origins, Drafting, and IntentPhiladelphiaUniversity of Pennsylvania Press 1999
The Development of Positive Obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights by the European Court of Human RightsPortland, ORHart Publishing 2004
Liberals and CommunitariansMalden, MAWiley-Blackwell 1996
Comparing Administrative Justice Across the CommonwealthCape Town:Juta Law Publishers 2006
The Role for Underlying Constitutional Principles in a Bill of Rights WorldNew Zealand U. L. Rev.9 2004Google Scholar
Reflections on Jackson v. Attorney General: Questioning Sovereignty 27 Legal Studies1 2007Google Scholar
Theorizing the Third Way: Qualified Consequentialism, the Proportionality Principle, and the New Social Democracy 27 J. L. & Soc’y493 2000Google Scholar
Grundrechte: Besonderer TeilCologneCarl Heymanns, Verlag 1985
American Constitutional InterpretationWestbury, NYFoundation Press 2008
Section One of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms: An Examination at Two Levels of Interpretation 21 Ottawa L. Rev.631 1989Google Scholar
The Tanner Lectures on Human ValuesSalt Lake City, UTUniversity of Utah Press 1979
The Constitutional Law of IsraelAlphen aan den Rijn, The NetherlandsKluwer Law International 2007
Notes for a Theory of Constrained Balancing in First Amendment Cases: An Essay in Honor of Tom Emerson 38 Case W. Res. L. Rev.576 1988Google Scholar
2000
The Rule of Law: Politicizing EthicsAshgate Publishing 2002
The Limitation of Rights: A Comparative Evolution and Ideology of the Oakes and Sparrow Tests 62 Sask. L. Rev.543 1999Google Scholar
The Evolution of Standing Rules in South Africa and Their Significance in Promoting Social Justice 18 SAJHR590 2002Google Scholar
A Skeptical View of Deference to the Executive in Times of Crisis 41 Isr. L. Rev.545 2008Google Scholar
The Right to Speak from Times to Time: First Amendment Theory Applied to Libel and Misapplied to Privacy 56 Cal. L. Rev.935 1968Google Scholar
General Principles of German and European Administrative Law – A Comparison in Historical Perspective 57 Mod. L. Rev.191 1994Google Scholar
Constitutional LawEagan MNWest 2010
UN Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: CCPR CommentaryKehl am Rhein, GermanyEngel 1993
Anarchy, State and UtopiaBasic Books 1974
Tilting at Windmills? Truth and Illusion in the Political Constitution 70 Mod. L. Rev.250 2007Google Scholar
Originalism in American Law and Politics: A Constitutional HistoryBaltimore, MDJohns Hopkins University Press 2007
Lost in Moral Space: On the Infringing/Violating Distinction and Its Place in the Theory of Rights 23 Law and Philosophy325 2004Google Scholar
A Comparative Study on the Principle of Proportionality in Turkish Administrative LawKamu Hukuku Arşivi, Khuk5 2003Google Scholar
Common Values and the Public–Private DivideLondon:Butterworths 1999
Human Rights and the Private Sphere: A Comparative StudyRoutledge-Cavendish 2007
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights: A CommentaryOxford University Press 1992
2007
Human Rights: From Rhetoric to RealityBasil Blackwell 1986
Human Rights and Their LimitsCambridge University Press 2009
Rights in New Constitutions of East Central Europe 26 Colum. Hum. Rts. L. Rev.111 1994Google Scholar
Judicial Review, Socio-Economic Rights and the Human Rights ActPortland, ORHart Publishing 2007
Judging Democracy: The New Politics of the High Court of AustraliaCambridge University Press 2001
The Dead Hands of the Founders?: Original Intent and the Constitutional Protection of Rights and Freedoms in Australia 25 Fed. L. Rev.211 1997Google Scholar
Jurisprudence: Men and Ideas of the LawFoundation Press 1953
The Absolute Prohibition of Torture and Necessary and Appropriate Sanctions 43 Valp. L. Rev.1535 2009Google Scholar
Law, Rights, and Discourse: The Legal Philosophy of Robert AlexyPortland, ORHart Publishing 2007
An Analytical Framework for the Application of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms 25 Osgoode Hall L. J.1 1987Google Scholar
Law, Interpretation and Reality: Essays in Epistemology, Hermeneutics and JurisprudenceDordrecht:Kluwer Academic Publishers 1990
It Works Fine in Europe, So Why Not Here? Comparative Law and Constitutional Federalism 23 Vt. L. Rev.885 1999Google Scholar
Le Problème des Lacunes en DroitParis:Librairie Générale de Droit et de Jurisprudence 1968
Protecting Human Rights in a Democracy: What Role for the Courts? 38 Wake Forest L. Rev.635 2003Google Scholar
The Legitimacy of Particular Conceptions of Constitutional Interpretation 77 Va. L. Rev.669 1991Google Scholar
Legal Polycentricity: Consequences of Pluralism in LawSudbury, MADartmouth Publishing Group 1995
Le Contrôle de Proportionnalité dans les Jurisprudences Constitutionnelle et Administrative FrancaisesAix-en-Provence: Presses Universitaires dAix-Marseille 1990
2000
Future Directions in Australian Constitutional LawSydney:Federation Press 1994
Chevron and Its Aftermath: Judicial Review of Agency Interpretation of Statutory Provisions 41 Vand. L. Rev.301 1998Google Scholar
Grundrechte Staatsrecht IIHeidelberg:C. F. Müller Verlag 2006
Constitutionalism – Human Rights – Separation of Powers: The Cyprus PrecedentLeidenBrill 2006
Avoiding Balancing: The Role of Exclusionary Reasons in Constitutional Law 45 Hastings L. J.711 1994Google Scholar
Why Rights Are Not Trumps: Social Meanings, Expressive Harms and Constitutionalism 27 J. Legal Studies725 1998Google Scholar
What Are Offences to Feelings Really About? A New Regulative Principle for the Multicultural Era 30 OJLS695 2010Google Scholar
Advocacy and Human Rights: Using the Convention in Courts and TribunalsLondon:Routledge Cavendish 2002
The Dual Model of Balancing: A Model for the Proper Scope of Balancing in Constitutional Law 27 Cardozo L. Rev.1393 2006Google Scholar
2007
Law, Pragmatism, and DemocracyCambridge, MAHarvard University Press 2003
Constitutional Domains: Democracy, Community, ManagementCambridge, MAHarvard University Press 1995
Roe Rage: Democratic Constitutionalism and Backlash 42 Harvard Civil Rights–Civil Liberies Law Review373 2007Google Scholar
Mission Accomplished: On Founding Constitutional Adjudication in Central EuropeBudapestCentral European University Press 2002
El Principio de Proporcionalidad y los Derechos FundamentalesMadrid:Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales 2007
Arguing Fundamental RightsDordrecht:Springer 2006
Defending Deference: A Response to Professors Epstein and Wells 69 Mo. L. Rev.959 2004Google Scholar
The Most Extraordinarily Powerful Court of Law the World Has Ever Known – Judicial Review in the United States and Germany 65 Md. L. Rev.152 2006Google Scholar
Freedom of Contracts and Constitutional LawHebrew University of Jerusalem 1998
Original Meanings: Politics and Ideas in the Making of the ConstitutionVintage Books 1996
2007
General Provisions of the South African Bill of RightsDurban:Butterworths 1995
Constitutional LawDurban:Butterworths 2004
A Theory of JusticeCambridge, MABelknap Press of Harvard University Press 1999
Political LiberalismColumbia University Press 1993
Engaging Reason: On the Theory of Value and ActionOxford University Press 1999
Practical Reasons and NormsOxford University Press 1999
The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and MoralityOxford:Clarendon Press 1979
The Morality of FreedomOxford:Clarendon Press 1986
Correctness, Reasonableness, and Proportionality: A New Standard of Judicial Review 31 Man. L. J.239 2005Google Scholar
2007
Os Princípios Constitucionais Estruturantes da República PortuguesaCoimbra, PortugalCoimbra Editora 2004
Toleration and the ConstitutionOxford University Press 1989
Rights and Freedoms: The New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 and the Human Rights Act 1993WellingtonBrookers 1995
The New Zealand Bill of RightsOxford University Press 2003
A Theory of Constitutional RightsOxford University Press 2002
Transnational Constitutionalism: International and European PerspectivesCambridge University Press 2007
Law, Rights, and Discourse: The Legal Philosophy of Robert AlexyPortland, ORHart Publishing 2007
Dialogue or Defiance: Legislative Reversals of Supreme Court Decisions in Canada and the United States 4 Int’l J. Const. L.347 2006Google Scholar
Must We Trade Rights for Security? The Choice Between Smart, Harsh, or Proportionate Security Strategies in Canada and Britain 27 Cardozo L. Rev.2151 2006Google Scholar
The Supreme Court on Trial: Judicial Activism or Democratic DialogueToronto:Irwin Law 2001
Korematsu and Beyond: Japanese Americans and the Origin of Strict Scrutiny 68 L. and Contemp. Probs.29 2005Google Scholar
Hate Speech in Constitutional Jurisprudence: A Comparative Analysis 24 Cardozo L. Rev.1532 2003Google Scholar
Judicial Balancing in Times of Stress: Comparing the American, British, and Israeli Approaches to the War on Terror 27 Cardozo L. Rev.2079 2006Google Scholar
The Right and the GoodOxford University Press 1930
Limitations on Human Rights in International Law: Their Relevance to the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms 6 Hum. Rts. Q.180 1984Google Scholar
2002
Rights and Their Limits: The Constitution for Europe in International and Comparative Legal Perspective 23 Berkeley J. Int’l L.223 2005Google Scholar
Reconnecting Doctrine and Purpose: A Comprehensive Approach to Strict Scrutiny after Adarand and Shaw 149 U. Pa. L. Rev.1 2001Google Scholar
Opinion: The Coming Age of the European Convention on Human RightsEur. Hum. Rts. L. Rev.18 1966Google Scholar
Offensiveness Analyzed: Lessons for Comparative Analysis of Free Speech Doctrines 2 Journal of International and Comparative Law at Chicago-Kent60 2002Google Scholar
Legal Formants: A Dynamic Approach to Comparative Law (Installment II of II) 39 Am. J. Comp. L.343 1991Google Scholar
GG Grundgesetz KommentarBeck 2007
Verfassungsrecht II GrundrechteBerlin:Springer 2003
Reasonableness and LawDordrecht:Springer 2009
Rights before Courts: A Study of Constitutional Courts in Postcommunist States of Central and Eastern EuropeDordrecht:Springer 2008
Justice in Plainclothes: A Theory of American Constitutional PracticeNew Haven, CTYale University Press 2006
Militant DemocracyUtrecht, The NetherlandsEleven International Publishing 2004
Western Rights? Post-Communist ApplicationKluwer Law International 1996
The Constitution in Private Relations: Expanding ConstitutionalismUtrecht, The NetherlandsEleven International Publishing 2005
2007
Interpreting Constitutions: Theories, Principles and InstructionAnnandale, AustraliaFederation Press 1996
Democracy’s Discontent: America in Search of a Public PhilosophyCambridge, MABelknap Press of Harvard University Press 1996
Liberalism and Its CriticsNew York University Press 1984
La Proporzionalita Dell’azione AdministrativaPadova, ItalyCedam 1988
Australian Administrative Law: Fundamentals, Principles and DoctrinesCambridge University Press 2007
A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the LawPrincetonUniversity Press 1997
Constitutional Justice Under Old ConstitutionsThe HagueKluwer Law International 1995
Implementing Limitations on the Use of Force: The Doctrine of Proportionality and Necessity 86 Am. Soc’y Int’l L. Proc.39 1992Google Scholar
Judicial Deference and Interpretive Coordinacy in State and Federal Constitutional Law 85 Cornell L. Rev.656 2000Google Scholar
Rights, Law, and Morality Themes from the Legal Philosophy of Robert AlexyOxford University Press 2011
Free Speech: A Philosophical EnquiryCambridge University Press 1982
European and US ConstitutionalismCambridge University Press 2005
Playing by the Rules: A Philosophical Examination of Rule-Based Decision-Making in Law and in LifeOxford University Press 1991
The Boundaries of the First Amendment: A Preliminary Exploration of Constitutional Silence 117 Harv. L. Rev.1765 2004Google Scholar
American Exceptionalism and Human RightsPrinceton University Press 1980
The Era of Deference: Courts, Expertise, and the Emergence of New Deal Administrative Law 106 Mich. L. Rev.399 2007Google Scholar
Festschrift 50 Jahre BundesverfassungsgerichtTübingenMohr Siebeck 2001
Constitutional TheoryDuke University Press 2008
The Struggle for Constitutional Justice in Post-Communist EuropeUniversity of Chicago Press 2002
European Administrative LawLondon:Sweet & Maxwell 1992
Practical ReasoningOxford University Press 1978
An Essay on Freedom of Speech: The United States Versus the Rest of the WorldMichigan State L. Rev.377 2006Google Scholar
The Last 10 Years’ Development of English Public Law 12 Australian J. of Adm. L.9 2004Google Scholar
2002
Disproportionality as a Cause of Action in Israeli Administrative Action 39 HaPraklit507 1990Google Scholar
Constitutional Interpretation: Illusion and RealityWestport, CTGreenwood Press 2001
Cracks in the Structure: The Coming Breakdown of the Levels of Scrutiny 45 Ohio St. L. J.161 1984Google Scholar
The Rule of Law: Nomos XXXVINew York University Press 1995
On Law, Politics and JudicializationOxford University Press 2002
Regional Protection of Human RightsOxford University Press 2008
The First Amendment, Democracy and RomanceCambridge, MAHarvard University Press 1990
Basic Rights: Subsistence, Affluence and US Foreign PolicyPrinceton University Press 1996
Origin of the Compelling State Interest Test and Strict Scrutiny 48 Am. J. Legal Hist.355 2006Google Scholar
The International Law of Human RightsOxford University Press 1983
Sutherland Statutes and Statutory ConstructionThomson West 2007
German Administrative Law in Common Law PerspectiveBerlin:Springer 2001
Legal Interpretation in Democratic StatesAldershotAshgate Publishing 2002
The Use and Abuse of Foreign Law in Constitutional Interpretation 32 Harv. J. L. & Pub. Pol’y653 2009Google Scholar
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms – Override Clauses under Art. 33 – Whether Subject to Judicial Review under Art. 1 61 Can. Bar Rev.391 1983Google Scholar
Verfassung und VerfassungsrechtMunich:Duncker & Humblot 1928
The Darkest Domain: Deference, Judicial Review, and the Bill of Rights 84 Iowa L. Rev.941 1999Google Scholar
Constitutional Judiciary in a New Democracy: The Hungarian Constitutional CourtUniversity of Michigan Press 2000
The Ethics of Deference: Learning from Law’s MoralsCambridge University Press 2002
Rights, Institutions and Impact of International Law According to the German Basic Law: The Contributions of the Federal Republic of Germany to the Second World Congress of the International Association of Constitutional LawBaden-Baden:Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft 1987
Studies in German Constitutionalism: The German Contributions to the Fourth World Congress of the International Association of Constitutional LawNomos 1995
Objectivity in LawOxford:Clarendon Press 1996
Wege und Verfahren des Verfassungslebens: Festschrift fur Peter Lerche zum 65 GeburstagMunich:Beck 1993
McCormick on EvidenceWest Publishing Company 2006
Governing with Judges: Constitutional Politics in EuropeOxford University Press 2000
Why Europe Rejected American Judicial Review and Why It May Not Matter 101 Mich. L. Rev.2744 2003Google Scholar
Rights, Personal Rights and Freedoms: The Nature of the Freedom of Political Communication 25 Melb. U. L. Rev.374 2001Google Scholar
The Limits of Constitutional Text and Structure: Standards of Review and the Freedom of Political Communication 23 Melb. U. L. Rev.668 1999Google Scholar
The Limits of Constitutional Text and Structure Revisited 28 Univ. of New South Wales L. J.50 2005Google Scholar
Legal System and Lawyers’ ReasoningStanford University Press 1968
Province and Function of Law: Law as Logic, Justice and Social Control, A Study in JurisprudenceSydneyAustralia Assoc. General Publication Pty Ltd. 1961
Social Dimensions of Law and JusticeLondon:Stevens 1966
All Things in Proportion? American Rights Doctrine and the Problem of BalancingEmory L. J. 2011Google Scholar
Proportionality Balancing and Global Constitutionalism 47 Colum. J. Transnat’l L.72 2008Google Scholar
The Less-Restrictive-Alternative Principle and Economic Due Process 80 Harv. L. Rev.1463 1967Google Scholar
Proportionality Principles in American Law: Controlling Excessive Government ActionsOxford University Press 2009
Post-Liberal Judging: The Roles of Categorization and Balancing 63 U. Colo. L. Rev.293 1992Google Scholar
Designing Democracy: What Constitutions DoOxford University Press 2002
The Second Bill of Rights: FDR’s Unfinished Revolution and Why We Need It More Than EverBasic Books 2004
The International Law of Human Rights and States of ExceptionThe Hague:Kluwer Law International 1998
On the Rule of Law: History, Politics, TheoryCambridge University Press 2004
The Global Expansion of Judicial PowerNew York University Press 1995
Transitional JusticeOxford University Press 2000
Section 1: Controlling the Oakes AnalysisLaw Society of Upper Canada Special Lectures 2001 479Google Scholar
The “Militant Democracy” Principle in Modern DemocraciesAshgate Publishing 2009
The Judicial Process: Realism, Pragmatism, Practical Reasoning and PrinciplesCambridge University Press 2005
Legitimate Expectations and Proportionality in Administrative LawPortland, ORHart Publishing 2000
The Realm of RightsCambridge, MAHarvard University Press 1990
Conflicts of Rights in the European Union: A Theory of Supranational AdjudicationOxford University Press 2009
General Legitimacy of Judicial Review and the Fundamental Basis of Constitutional Law 23 OJLS525 2003Google Scholar
2009
The Legitimacy of Judicial Review: The Limits of Dialogue Between Courts and Legislatures 3 I. Con.617 2005Google Scholar
The Limitation of Charter Rights: Critical Essays on R. v. OakesMontreal:Thémis 2009
American Constitutional LawMineola, NYFoundation Press 1988
American Constitutional LawFoundation Press 2000
The Abortion Funding Conundrum: Inalienable Rights, Affirmative Duties, and the Dilemma of Dependence 99 Harv. L. Rev.330 1985Google Scholar
The Invisible ConstitutionOxford University Press 2008
On Reading the ConstitutionCambridge, MAHarvard University Press 1991
The Principle of Proportionality in the Laws of EuropePortland, ORHart Publishing 1999
The General Principles of EC LawOxford University Press 1999
The Principle of Proportionality in Community Law: From the Rule of Law to Market Integration 31 Irish Jurist83 1996Google Scholar
Proportionality: An Assault on Human Rights?: A Rejoinder to Madhav Khosla 8 I. Con.307 2010Google Scholar
The Migration of Constitutional IdeasCambridge University Press 2006
Taking the Constitution Away from the CourtsPrinceton University Press 2000
Weak Courts, Strong Rights: Judicial Review and Social Welfare Rights in Comparative Constitutional LawPrinceton University Press 2008
Conflicts Between Fundamental RightsMortsel, BelgiumIntersentia 2008
Judicial Review of Legislation: A Comparative Study of the United Kingdom, The Netherlands and South AfricaDordrecht:Springer 2010
Limitation of Rights: A Study of the European Convention and the South African Bill of RightsNijmegen, The NetherlandsWolf Legal Publishers 2005
Theory and Practice of the European Convention on Human RightsIntersentia Publishing 2006
The Principle of Proportionality in the Laws of EuropePortland, ORHart Publishing 1999
Keeping Things in Proportion: The Judiciary, Executive Action and Human Rights 22 New Zealand U. L. Rev.300 2006Google Scholar
Powerco v. Commerce Commission: Developing Trends of Proportionality in New Zealand Administrative LawNZJPIL339 2006Google Scholar
Incommensurability, Proportionality, and Rational Legal Decision-Making 4 Law & Ethics Hum. Rts.176 2010Google Scholar
The American Constitutional Tradition of Shared and Separated Powers: Separation of Powers, the Rule of Law and the Idea of Independence 30 Wm. and Mary L. Rev.301 1989Google Scholar
Judging under UncertaintyCambridge, MAHarvard University Press 2006
Contemporary Questions Surrounding the Constitutional Amending ProcessSanta Barbara, CAPraeger Publishers 1993
2007
Authority and Responsibility: The Jurisprudence of Deference 43 Admin. L. Rev.135 1991Google Scholar
Freedom of Speech, Permissible Tailoring and Transcending Strict Scrutiny 144 U. Pa. L. Rev.2417 1996Google Scholar
The Evolution of the Concept of the Just War in International Law 33 Am. J. Int’l L.665 1939Google Scholar
Some Observations on the Role of the Judge under the Swiss Civil Code 37 La. L. Rev.681 1977Google Scholar
The New Legal Order in Hong KongHong Kong University Press 1999
Theories of RightsOxford University Press 1984
Law and DisagreementOxford:Clarendon Press 1999
The Dignity of LegislationCambridge University Press 1999
Judicial Review in Review: A Four-Part Defense of Legal Constitutionalism: A Review Essay on Political Constitutionalism 7 Int’l J. Const. L.329 2009Google Scholar
The Common Law Constitution in Canada: Return of Lex Non Scripta as Fundamental Law 51 U. Toronto L. J.91 2001Google Scholar
Expounding the Constitution: Essays in Constitutional TheoryCambridge University Press 2008
Making Sense of Canadian Constitutional Interpretation 12 National Journal of Constitutional Law315 2001Google Scholar
A Common Law Theory of Judicial Review: The Living TreeCambridge University Press 2007
On TolerationNew Haven, CTYale University Press 1997
Legal Transplants: An Approach to Comparative LawAthens, GAUniversity of Georgia Press 1993
2007
The Negotiable Constitution: On the Limitation of RightsCambridge University Press 2009
23 Carswell Practice Cases245 1988
‘Taking Rights Seriously’: The European Court and Its Fundamental Rights Jurisprudence – Part 1 32 Common Market L. Rev.51 1995Google Scholar
Rights and Judges in a Democracy: A New Canadian Version 18 U. Mich. J. L. Reform51 1984Google Scholar
Canada’s Charter of Rights: Paradigm Lost?,” 6 Review of Constitutional Studies119 2002Google Scholar
Defining the Field of Comparative Constitutional LawWestport, CT:Praeger 2002
2002
The Migration of Constitutional IdeasCambridge University Press 2006
The Supreme Court of Canada and Section One of the Charter 10 Sup. Ct. L. Rev.469 1988Google Scholar
The Supreme Court of Canada in the Age of Rights: Constitutional Democracy, the Role of Law and Fundamental Rights under Canada’s Constitution 80 Can. Bar Rev.699 2001Google Scholar
2005
The First Amendment Comes of Age: The Emergence of Free Speech in Twentieth-Century America 95 Mich. L. Rev.299 1996Google Scholar
Jacobs, White and Ovey: The European Convention on Human RightsOxford University Press 2010
Extrajudicial Constitutional Interpretation: Three Objections and Responses 80 N. C. L. Rev.773 2002Google Scholar
Constitutional Interpretation. Textual Meaning, Original Intent, and Judicial ReviewLawrence, KSUniversity Press of Kansas 1999
2007
The Concepts of Proportionality and State Crimes in International LawFrankfurt: Lang Publishing Group 2006
Evidence in Trials at Common LawBoston:Little Brown & Co. 1981
Evidence in Trials at Common LawBoston:Little Brown & Co. 1983
The Limitation of Human Rights in Comparative Constitutional LawMontreal:Les Editions Yvon Blais 1986
Human Rights under the Australian ConstitutionOxford University Press 1999
Fatal in Theory and Strict in Fact: An Empirical Analysis of Strict Scrutiny in the Federal Courts 59 Vand. L. Rev.793 2006Google Scholar
Legal ReasoningBrussels:Emile Bruylant 1971
Future Directions in Australian Constitutional LawSydney:Federation Press 1994
Judicial Determination of Questions of Fact Affecting the Constitutional Validity of Legislative Action 38 Harv. L. Rev.6 1925Google Scholar
Towards the Nutcracker Principle: Reconsidering the Objections to ProportionalityPL92 2000Google Scholar
2002
Metaphors and Mirages: Some Marginalia on Choudhry’s The Lochner Era and Comparative Constitutionalism and Ready-Made Constitutional Narratives 20 SAPL281 2005Google Scholar
Riding the Push-Me Pull-You: Constructing a Test that Reconciles the Conflicting Interests Which Animate the Limitation Clause 10 SAJHR60 1994Google Scholar
2002
The Application of the Principle of Proportionality in Tecmed v. Mexico 6 Chin. J. Int’l L.635 2007Google Scholar
Parliamentary Sovereignty and the Human Rights ActPortland, ORHart Publishing 2009
The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine in the Dynamics of European Human Rights JurisprudenceDordrecht:Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 1996
Israel’s Administrative Law as Compared to Germany’s Administrative Law 2 Mishpat U’Mimshal [Law and Government109 1994Google Scholar
Human Rights and Private Law: Privacy as AutonomyHart Publishing 2006
The High Court and the ConstitutionFederation Press 2008
Constitutional Dilemmas: Conflicts of Fundamental Legal Rights in Europe and the USAOxford University Press 2007