Book contents
- Protecting the Individual from International Authority
- Protecting the Individual from International Authority
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Human Rights Protection in International Organizations: An Introduction
- 2 Conceptual Framework
- 3 UN Sanctions Policy and the Protection of Subsistence Rights: Fighting Off a Reputational Crisis
- 4 UN Sanctions Policy and the Protection of Due Process Rights: Making Use of Global Legal Pluralism
- 5 EU Sanctions Policy and the Protection of Subsistence Rights: Learning from the Early Mover
- 6 EU Sanctions Policy and the Protection of Due Process Rights: Judicial Lawmaking by the Court of Justice of the EU
- Notes on Chapters 3–6
- 7 UN Peacekeeping and the Protection of Bodily Integrity Rights: When Protectors Become Perpetrators
- 8 UN Peacekeeping and the Protection of Due Process Rights: Learning How to Protect the Rights of Detainees
- 9 NATO Peacekeeping and the Protection of Bodily Integrity Rights and the Right Not to Be Enslaved: Domestic Channels for NATO Reform
- 10 NATO Peacekeeping and the Protection of Due Process Rights: The OSCE and Council of Europe as Advocates for the Rights of Detainees
- Notes on Chapters 7–10
- 11 Human Rights Protection in World Bank Lending: Following the Lead of the US Congress
- 12 Human Rights Protection in IMF Lending: Organizational Inertia and the Limits of Like-Minded Institution-Building
- Notes on Chapters 11–12
- 13 The Rise of Human Rights Protection in International Organizations – Results and Theoretical Implications
- Book part
- Index
- References
9 - NATO Peacekeeping and the Protection of Bodily Integrity Rights and the Right Not to Be Enslaved: Domestic Channels for NATO Reform
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 April 2017
Book contents
- Protecting the Individual from International Authority
- Protecting the Individual from International Authority
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Human Rights Protection in International Organizations: An Introduction
- 2 Conceptual Framework
- 3 UN Sanctions Policy and the Protection of Subsistence Rights: Fighting Off a Reputational Crisis
- 4 UN Sanctions Policy and the Protection of Due Process Rights: Making Use of Global Legal Pluralism
- 5 EU Sanctions Policy and the Protection of Subsistence Rights: Learning from the Early Mover
- 6 EU Sanctions Policy and the Protection of Due Process Rights: Judicial Lawmaking by the Court of Justice of the EU
- Notes on Chapters 3–6
- 7 UN Peacekeeping and the Protection of Bodily Integrity Rights: When Protectors Become Perpetrators
- 8 UN Peacekeeping and the Protection of Due Process Rights: Learning How to Protect the Rights of Detainees
- 9 NATO Peacekeeping and the Protection of Bodily Integrity Rights and the Right Not to Be Enslaved: Domestic Channels for NATO Reform
- 10 NATO Peacekeeping and the Protection of Due Process Rights: The OSCE and Council of Europe as Advocates for the Rights of Detainees
- Notes on Chapters 7–10
- 11 Human Rights Protection in World Bank Lending: Following the Lead of the US Congress
- 12 Human Rights Protection in IMF Lending: Organizational Inertia and the Limits of Like-Minded Institution-Building
- Notes on Chapters 11–12
- 13 The Rise of Human Rights Protection in International Organizations – Results and Theoretical Implications
- Book part
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Protecting the Individual from International AuthorityHuman Rights in International Organizations, pp. 203 - 219Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Allred, Keith J. 2009. ‘Human trafficking and peacekeepers’, in Friesendorf, (ed.), Strategies against Human Trafficking: The Role of the Security Sector. Geneva: Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces.Google Scholar
Amnesty International 2004. ‘“So Does It Mean We Have the Rights?” Protecting the Human Rights of Women and Girls Trafficked for Forced Prostitution in Kosovo’. AI Index EUR 70/010/2004. www.amnesty.org/en/documents/eur70/010/2004/en/ (28 October 2015).Google Scholar
Ballesteros, Alvaro 2007. ‘Trafficking in human beings and international peacekeeping missions: The 2004 NATO THB policy’. Connections: The Quarterly Journal 6(3): 121–139.Google Scholar
Brickell, Missye (2010) ‘Filling the criminal liability gap for private military contractors abroad: U.S. v. Slough and the Civilian Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Act of 2010’. Legislation and Policy Brief 2(2): Article 3. http://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1014&context=lpb (28 October 2015).Google Scholar
Doyle, Charles 2012. ‘Civilian Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Act: Federal Contractor Criminal Liability Overseas’. Congressional Research Service, Report for Congress. 15 February. www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R42358.pdf (9 September 2015).Google Scholar
Human Rights Watch 2002. ‘Hopes Betrayed. Trafficking of Women and Girls to Post-Conflict Bosnia and Herzegovina for Forced Prostitution’. Vol. 14, No. 9, November. www.hrw.org/reports/2002/bosnia/ (28 October 2015).Google Scholar
Mendelson, Sarah E. 2005. ‘Barracks and Brothels. Peacekeepers and Human Trafficking in the Balkans’. CSIS Report. http://csis.org/files/media/csis/pubs/0502_barracksbrothels.pdf (25 October 2015).Google Scholar
NATO 2004a. ‘Policy on Combating Trafficking in Human Beings’. EAPC doc. EAPC(C)D(2004)0029. 8 June.Google Scholar
NATO 2004b. ‘Policy on Combating Trafficking in Human Beings’. EAPC doc. EAPC(C)D(2004)0029, Appendix 2 (training). 8 June.Google Scholar
NATO 2004c. ‘Policy on Combating Trafficking in Human Beings’. EAPC doc. EAPC(C)D(2004)0029, Appendix 3 (staff guidelines). 8 June.Google Scholar
NATO 2009. ‘Bi-SC Directive 40–1: Integrating UNSCR 1325 and Gender Perspectives in the NATO Command Structure including Measures for Protection during Armed Conflict’. Supreme Allied Commander. 2 September. http://www.nato.int/nato_static/assets/pdf/pdf_2009_09/20090924_Bi-SC_DIRECTIVE_40-1.pdf (28 October 2015).Google Scholar
NATO 2010b. ‘Women, Peace and Security’. NATO Briefing Paper. www.nato.int/nato_static/assets/pdf/pdf_publications/20120116_UNSCR_EN.pdf (9 September 2015).Google Scholar
NATO 2012. ‘Bi-SC Directive 40–1: Integrating UNSCR 1325 and Gender Perspectives into the NATO Command Structure’. Supreme Allied Commander. 8 August. www.nato.int/nato_static_fl2014/assets/pdf/pdf_2015_04/20150414_20120808_NU_Bi-SCD_40-11.pdf (28 October 2015).Google Scholar
NATO Parliamentary Assembly 2004. ‘Resolution 232 on Trafficking in Children’. November. Venice. www.nato-pa.int/default.asp?SHORTCUT=595 (26 October 2015).Google Scholar
Sewall, Sarah 2008. ‘A Strategy of Conservation: American Power and the International System’. Harvard Kennedy School, Faculty Research Working Paper Series. www.uquebec.ca/observgo/fichiers/53123_RII-13.pdf (9 September 2015).Google Scholar
Skjelsbaek, Inger 2004. ‘The NATO stabilization force in Bosnia and Herzegovina: A military intervention facing new civilian challenges’, in Hostens, , Skjelsbaek, and Barth, (eds.), Gender Aspects of Conflict Interventions: Intended and Unintended Consequences, Report to the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Oslo: International Peace Research Institute (PRIO), pp. 25–38.Google Scholar
Stolz, Barbara A. 2005. ‘Educating policymakers and setting the criminal justice policymaking agenda: Interest groups and the Victims of Trafficking and Violence Act of 2000’. Criminal Justice. The International Journal of Policy and Practice 5(4): 407–430.Google Scholar
Stolz, Barbara A. 2011. ‘Criminal justice policy and transnational crime: The case of anti-human trafficking policy’, in Ismaili, (ed.), US Criminal Justice Policy. A Contemporary Reader. Burlington: Jones and Bartlett Learning, pp. 307–331.Google Scholar
United States Department of Defense 2003. ‘Assessment of the DoD efforts to Combat Trafficking in Persons. Phase II: Bosnia-Herzegovina and Kosovo’. Office of the Inspector General, Case number H03L88433128. 8 December. www.hrw.org/reports/2002/bosnia/ig.pdf (26 October 2015).Google Scholar
United States Government 2002. ‘National Security Presidential Directive, NSPD-22’. 16 December. www.combat-trafficking.army.mil/documents/policy/NSPD-22.pdf (26 October 2015).Google Scholar
Wallander, Celeste 2000. ‘Institutional assets and adaptability: NATO after the Cold War’. International Organization 54: 705–735.Google Scholar
Yost, Mark J. and Anderson, Douglas S. 2001. ‘The Military Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Act of 2000: Closing the gap’. The American Journal of International Law 95(2): 446–454.Google Scholar