Book contents
- Pseudoscience in Child and Adolescent Psychotherapy
- Pseudoscience in Child and Adolescent Psychotherapy
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Sidebars
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Critical Thinking about Psychotherapy
- 2 Intellectual and Adaptive Functioning
- 3 Autism Spectrum
- 4 Inattention and Hyperactivity
- 5 Learning
- 6 Tics
- 7 Psychosis
- 8 Bipolar Spectrum
- 9 Depression
- 10 Anxiety
- 11 Obsessions and Compulsions
- 12 Trauma and Attachment
- 13 Feeding
- 14 Eating
- 15 Toileting
- 16 Sleep
- 17 Disruptive Behavior and Conduct
- 18 Substance Use
- 19 Skepticism and Psychotherapy
- Index
- References
18 - Substance Use
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 February 2019
Edited by
Book contents
- Pseudoscience in Child and Adolescent Psychotherapy
- Pseudoscience in Child and Adolescent Psychotherapy
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Sidebars
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Critical Thinking about Psychotherapy
- 2 Intellectual and Adaptive Functioning
- 3 Autism Spectrum
- 4 Inattention and Hyperactivity
- 5 Learning
- 6 Tics
- 7 Psychosis
- 8 Bipolar Spectrum
- 9 Depression
- 10 Anxiety
- 11 Obsessions and Compulsions
- 12 Trauma and Attachment
- 13 Feeding
- 14 Eating
- 15 Toileting
- 16 Sleep
- 17 Disruptive Behavior and Conduct
- 18 Substance Use
- 19 Skepticism and Psychotherapy
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Pseudoscience in Child and Adolescent PsychotherapyA Skeptical Field Guide, pp. 276 - 290Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Works Cited in Sidebar
Innocorp, ltd. (n.d.a). Fatal Vision® Roadster – Pedal Kart (only). Retrieved from https://fatalvision.comGoogle Scholar
Innocorp, ltd. (n.d.b). Fatal Vision® Community Event Pack. Retrieved from https://fatalvision.comGoogle Scholar
Jewell, J., & Hupp, S. D. (2005). Examining the effects of fatal vision goggles on changing attitudes and behaviors related to drinking and driving. Journal of Primary Prevention, 26(6), 553–565.Google Scholar
Jewell, J., Hupp, S., & Luttrell, G. (2004). The effectiveness of fatal vision goggles: Disentangling experiential versus onlooker effects. Journal of Alcohol and Drug Education, 48(3), 63–84.Google Scholar
References
Alcoholics Anonymous. (1953). Twelve steps and twelve traditions. New York: A.A. World Services.Google Scholar
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 5th edn. Arlington, VA: Author.Google Scholar
Arkowitz, H., & Lilienfeld, S.O. (2017). Facts and fictions in mental health. The Atrium, UK: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Arnett, J. (2015). Emerging adulthood: The winding road from the late teens through the twenties. 2nd edn. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Association of Intervention Specialists. (2016 March). “What is the Johnson Model?” Retrieved from www.associationofinterventionspecialists.orgGoogle Scholar
Bobek, M., Piazza, N., John, T., Fischer, J., & Hogue, A. (2018). Substance use. In Hupp, S. (ed.), Child and adolescent psychotherapy: Components of Evidence-based treatment for youth and their parents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Caputi, T., & McLellan, T. (2017). Truth and D.A.R.E.: Is D.A.R.E.’s new Keepin’ it REAL curriculum suitable for American nationwide implementation? Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 24, 49–57.Google Scholar
Coghill, D. & Sonuga-Barke, E. (2012). Annual Research Review: Categories versus dimensions in the classification and conceptualisation of child and adolescent mental disorders – implications of recent empirical study. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 53, 469–489.Google Scholar
Degenhardt, L., Stockings, E., Patton, G., Hall, W., & Lynskey, M. (2016). The increasing global health priority of substance use in young people. The Lancet Psychiatry 3(3), 251–264.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeJong, W. (1987). A short-term evaluation of Project D.A.R.E. (Drug Abuse Resistance Education): Preliminary indications of effectiveness. Journal of Drug Education, 17, 279–294.Google Scholar
Dishion, T. J., McCord, J., & Poulin, F. (1999). When interventions harm: Peer groups and problem behavior. American Psychologist, 54(9), 755–764.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dishion, T. J., & Snyder, J. J. (2016). Coercion dynamics: Past, present, and future. In Dishion, T. J. & Snyder, J. J. (eds.), The Oxford handbook of coercive relationship dynamics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Foxcroft, D. R., & Tsertsvadze, A. (2012). Cochrane Review: Universal school-based prevention programs for alcohol misuse in young people. Evidenced-Based Child Health, 7, 450–575.Google Scholar
Gandhi, A. G., Murphy-Graham, E., Petrosino, A., Chrismer, S. S., & Weiss, C. H. (2007). The devil is in the details: Examining the evidence for “proven” school-based drug abuse prevention programs. Evaluation Review, 31(1), 43–74.Google Scholar
Hayes, S. C. (2004). Acceptance and commitment therapy, relational frame theory, and the third wave of behavioral and cognitive therapies. Behavior Therapy, 35(4), 639–665.Google Scholar
Hogue, A., Henderson, C. E., Becker, S. J., & Knight, D. K. (2018). Evidence base on outpatient behavioral treatments for adolescent substance use, 2014–2017. Outcomes, treatment delivery, and promising horizons. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 47(4), 499–526.Google Scholar
Hornik, R., Jacobson, L., Orwin, R., Piesse, A., & Kalton, G. (2008). Effects of the national youth anti-drug media campaign on youths. American Journal of Public Health, 98(12), 2229–2236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, V. E. (1986). Intervention: How to help someone who doesn’t want help: A step-by-step guide for families and friends of chemically dependent persons. Center City, MN: Hazelden.Google Scholar
Kaminer, Y. & Winters, K. (2015). DSM-5 criteria for youth substance disorders: Lost in translation? Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 54(5), 350–351.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kelly, J., Yeterian, J., Cristello, J., Kaminer, Y., Kahler, C., & Timko, C. (2016). Developing and testing twelve-step facilitation for adolescents with substance use disorder: Manual development and preliminary outcomes. Substance Abuse, 10, 55–64.Google Scholar
Koocher, G., McMann, M. Stout, A., & Norcross, J. (2014). Discredited assessment and treatment methods used with children and adolescents: A Delphi poll. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 44(5), 722–729.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lilienfeld, S. O. (2007). Psychological treatments that cause harm. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2(1), 53–70.Google Scholar
Lilienfeld, S. O., Lynn, S. J., & Lohr, J. M. (2015). Science and pseudoscience in clinical psychology. In Lilienfeld, S. O., Lynn, S. J., & Lohr, J. M. (eds.), Science and pseudoscience in clinical psychology. 2nd edn. New York: Guilford Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
Lyman, M. D. (2016). Drugs in society: Causes, concepts, and control. 7th edn. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
MacKillop, J., & Gray, J. (2015). Controversial treatments for alcohol use disorders. In Lilienfeld, S. O., Lynn, S. J., & Lohr, J. M. (eds.), Science and pseudoscience in clinical psychology. 2nd ed. New York: Guilford Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
Miller, W. R., & Kurtz, E. (1994). Models of alcoholism used in treatment: Contrasting A.A. and other perspectives with which it is often confused. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 55(2), 159–166.Google Scholar
Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. R. (2012). Motivational interviewing: Helping people change. 3rd edn. New York: Guilford Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
Naar, S., & Suarez, M. (2011). Motivational Interviewing with adolescents and young adults. New York: Guilford Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
National Institute on Drug Abuse. (2012, December). Principles of drug addiction treatment: A research-based guide. 3rd edn. Retrieved from www.drugabuse.gov/publications/principles-drug-addiction-treatment-research-based-guide-third-editionGoogle Scholar
Petrosino, A. (2003). Standards for evidence and evidence for standards: The case of school-aged drug prevention. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 587, 180–207.Google Scholar
Ringwalt, C., Greene, J., Ernett, S., Iachan, R. Clayton, R., & Leukefeld, C. (1994). Past and future direction of the D.A.R.E. Program: An evaluation review. Research Triangle Park, NC: Research Triangle Institute.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, D., & Hanson, G. (1998). Assessing the effects of school-based drug education: A 6-year multilevel analysis of project D.A.R.E. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 35(4), 381–412.Google Scholar
Satel, S., & Lilienfeld, S. O. (2014). Addiction and the brain-disease fallacy. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 4, 141.Google Scholar
Stockings, E., Hall, W., Lynskey, M., Marley, K., Reavley, N., Strang, J. … & Degenhardt, L. (2016). Prevention, early intervention, harm reduction, and treatment of substance use in young people. The Lancet Psychiatry, 3(3), 280–296.Google Scholar
Singh, R., Jimerson, S., Renshaw, T., Saeki, R., Hart, S., Earhart, J., & Stewart, K. A. (2011). Summary and synthesis of contemporary empirical evidence regarding the effects of the drug abuse resistance education program (D.A.R.E.). Contemporary School Psychology, 15, 93.Google Scholar
Sloboda, Z., Stephens, R., Stephens, P., Grey, S., Teasdale, B., Hawthorne, R. … & Marquette, J. (2009). The adolescent substance abuse prevention study: A randomized field trial of a universal substance abuse prevention program. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 102, 1–10.Google Scholar
Stoner, S. A. (2016, March). Treating youth substance use: Evidence based practices and their clinical significance: Alcohol and Drug Institute, University of Washington. Retrieved from http://adai.uw.edu/pubs/pdf/2016youthsubstusebrief.pdfGoogle Scholar
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2006). Keepin’ It Real. Retrieved from www.nrepp.samhsa.govGoogle Scholar
Sussman, S. (l). A review of Alcohoics Anonymous/Narcotics Anonymous program for teens. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 33(1), 26–55. http://doi.org/10.1177/016327870936186Google Scholar
The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. (2009, January). Funded: “Taking Charge of Your Life” curriculum longitudinal study findings released. Retrieved from www.rwjf.org/en/about-rwjf/newsroom-content/2009/03/the-robert-wood-johnson-funded-take-charge-of-your-li.htmlGoogle Scholar
US Department of Education. (1998). Safe and drug-free schools program: Notice of final principles of effectiveness. Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). (2016 November). Office of the Surgeon General, facing addiction in America: The Surgeon General’s Report on Alcohol, Drugs and Health. Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
Weiss, C., Murphy-Graham, E., & Birkeland, S. (2005). An alternate route to policy influence: How evaluations affect D.A.R.E. American Journal of Evaluation, 26, 12–30.Google Scholar
Weiss, C., Murphy-Graham, E., Petrosino, A., & Gandhi, A. (2017). The fairy godmother-and her warts. American Journal of Evaluation, 29(1), 29–47.Google Scholar
White, W. (2014). Slaying the dragon: The history of addiction treatment and recovery in America. 2nd edn. Bloomington, IL: Chestnut Health Systems/Lighthouse Institute.Google Scholar