Abraham, T. H. (2002). (Physio)logical circuits: The intellectual origins of the McCulloch-Pitts neural networks. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 38, 3–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Adams, R. W. (1998). The 1918 Spanish influenza, Berkeley’s “Quinta Columna.” Chronicle of the University of California, 1, 49–58.Google Scholar

Allen, P. (2004). Abolitionist, suffragist, philanthropist: The life and work of reformer Elizabeth Buffum Chace. Journal of Women’s History, 16, 183–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allport, G. W., Hunt, W. A., Klein, D. B., Murphy, G., Rosenzweig, S., Tolman, E. C…Burks, B. S. (1940). Report of the committee on displaced foreign psychologists. Psychological Bulletin, 37, 715–718.Google Scholar

Allport, G. W. (1936, March 6). Letter to Isadore Krechevsky. Drs. Nicholas and Dorothy Cummings Center for the History of Psychology, The University of Akron, Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues (SPSSI) records, box 186, folder “Correspondence, 1937–1938.”Google Scholar

Allport, G. W. (1940). The psychologist’s frame of reference. Psychological Bulletin, 37, 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allport, G. W. (1943a). The productive paradoxes of William James. Psychological Review, 50, 95–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allport, G. W. (1943b). Review of Drives Toward War. Psychological Bulletin, 40, 293–296.Google Scholar

Allport, G. W. (1945). Human nature and the peace. Psychological Bulletin, 42, 376–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allport, G. W., & Veltfort, H. R. (1943). Social psychology and the civilian war effort. Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 165–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

American Association of University Professors. (1921). Membership. Bulletin of the American Association of University Professors, 7, 52–55.Google Scholar

American Peace Society. (1906). List of Members. Advocate of Peace, 68, 199–208.Google Scholar

American Psychological Association. (1895). Proceedings of the third annual meeting of the American Psychological Association. Psychological Review, 2, 149–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

American Psychological Association. (1915).Yearbook. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

American Psychological Association. (1936). Proceedings of the forty-fourth meeting of the American Psychological Association. Psychological Bulletin, 33, 677–816.Google Scholar

American Psychological Association. (1957). Distinguished scientific contribution awards. American Psychologist, 12, 155–168.Google Scholar

American Psychological Association. (1963). Tolman Hall: University of California, Berkeley. American Psychologist, 18, 720–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

American Psychological Association. (1957). Distinguished scientific contribution awards. American Psychologist, 12, 155–168.Google Scholar

American Psychological Association. (1983). Awards for distinguished scientific contributions: 1982. American Psychologist, 38, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

American Society of Mechanical Engineers. (1915). ASME Transactions. New York: ASME.Google Scholar

American Unitarian Association. (1889). Annual report of the Board of Directors. Boston: American Unitarian Association.Google Scholar

Amundson, R. (1983). E. C. Tolman and the intervening variable: A study in the epistemological history of psychology. Philosophy of Science, 50, 268–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Amundson, R. (1985). Psychology and epistemology: The place versus response Controversy. Cognition, 20, 127–153.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Amundson, R. (1986). The unknown epistemology of E. C. Tolman. British Journal of Psychology, 77, 525–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Angell, J. R. (1907). The province of functional psychology. Psychological Review, 14, 61–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ash, M. G. (1987). Psychology and politics in interwar Vienna: The Vienna Psychological Institute, 1922–1942. In Ash, M. G. & Woodward, W. R. (Eds.), Psychology in twentieth-century thought and society (pp. 143–164). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ash, M. G. (1992). Cultural contexts and scientific change in psychology: Kurt Lewin in Iowa. American Psychologist, 47, 198–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ash, M. G. (1998). Gestalt psychology in German culture, 1890–1967: Holism and the quest for objectivity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ash, M. G. (2001). Egon Brunswik before and after emigration: A study in the history of science. In Hammond, K. R. & Stewart, T. R. (Eds.), The essential Brunswik: Beginnings, explications, applications (pp. 453–464). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ash, M. G. (2005). The uses and usefulness of psychology. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 600, 99–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baars, B. J. (1986). The cognitive revolution in psychology. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Bandura, A. (2007). Albert Bandura. In Lindzey, G. & Runyan, W. M. (Eds.), A history of psychology in autobiography (Vol. IX, pp. 43–75). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Banks, L. M. III (1995). The Office of Strategic Services Psychological Selection Program. Master’s thesis, U. S. Army.Google Scholar

Beals, C. E. (1916). Benjamin Franklin Trueblood. Advocate of Peace, 78, 326–329.Google Scholar

Benjamin, L. T. Jr. (2007). A history of psychology in letters (2nd ed.). New York, NY:Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Benjamin, L. T. Jr. (1979). The Midwestern Psychological Association: A history of the organization and its antecedents, 1902–1978. American Psychologist, 34, 201–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benjamin, L. T. Jr. (1997). The origin of psychological species: History of the beginnings of American Psychological Association divisions. American Psychologist, 52, 725–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benjamin, L. T. Jr. (2000a). The psychology laboratory at the turn of the 20^th century. American Psychologist, 55, 318–321.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Benjamin, L. T. Jr. (2000b). Hugo Münsterberg. In Kazdin, A. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 354–356). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Benjamin, L. T. Jr. (2006). Hugo Münsterberg’s attack on the application of scientific psychology. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 414–425.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Benjamin, L. T. Jr. (2007). A history of psychology in letters (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Bennett, A. T. D. (1996). Do animals have a cognitive map? Journal of Experimental Biology, 199, 219–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benveniste, D. (2006). The early history of psychoanalysis in San Francisco. Psychoanalysis and History, 8, 1–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bettencourt, B. A. (1993). The Western Psychological Association. In Pate, J. L. & Wertheimer, M. (Eds.), No small part: A history of regional organizations in American psychology (pp. 21–42). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bird, K., & Sherwin, M. J. (2005). American Prometheus: The triumph and tragedy of Robert Oppenheimer. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar

Black, A. H., Nadel, L., & O’Keefe, J. (1977). Hippocampal function in avoidance learning and punishment. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 1107–1129.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Blauner, B. (2009). Resisting McCarthyism: To sign or not sign California’s loyalty oath. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blodgett, H. C. (1929). The effect of the introduction of reward upon the maze performance of rats. University of California Publications in Psychology, 4, 113–134.Google Scholar

Blodgett, G. T. (1962). The mind of the Boston Mugwump. The Mississippi Valley Historical Review, 48, 614–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blumberg, A. E. & Feigl, H. (1931). Logical positivism. Journal of Philosophy, 28, 281–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boring, E. G. (1920). Statistics of the American Psychological Association in 1920. Psychological Bulletin, 17, 271–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boring, E. G. (1927a). The problem of originality in science. The American Journal of Psychology, 39, 70–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boring, E. G. (1927b). Edward Bradford Titchener: 1867–1927. The American Journal of Psychology, 38, 489–506.Google Scholar

Boring, E. G. (1929). The psychology of controversy. Psychological Review, 36, 97–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boring, E. G. (1930). The “Gestalt” psychology and the “Gestalt” movement. The American Journal of Psychology, 42, 308–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boring, E. G. (1938). The Society of Experimental Psychologists: 1904–1938. The American Journal of Psychology, 51, 410–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boring, E. G., Bryan, A. I., Doll, E. A., Elliott, R. M., Hilgard, E. R., Stone, C. P., & Yerkes, R. M. (1942). First report of the subcommittee on survey and planning in psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 39, 619–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boring, M. D., & Boring, E. G. (1948). Masters and pupils among the American psychologists. American Journal of Psychology, 61, 527–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bridgman, P.W. (1927). The logic of modern physics. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Bridgman, P. W. (1938). Operational analysis. Philosophy of science, 5, 114–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bringmann, W., Bringmann, N. J., & Ungerer, G. A. (1997). The establishment of Wundt’s laboratory: An archival and documentary study. In Benjamin, L. T. Jr., A history of psychology: Original sources and contemporary research (2nd ed., pp. 151–157). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Broad, C. D. (1929). The mind and its place in nature. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and Company.Google Scholar

Brock, A. (1994). Whatever happened to Karl Bühler? Canadian Psychology, 35, 319–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, W. (1927). Proceedings of the sixth annual meeting of the Western Psychological Association. Psychological Bulletin, 24, 313–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, W. (1928). Proceedings of the Western Psychological Association. Psychological Bulletin, 25, 446–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, W. (1929). Proceedings of the Western Psychological Association. Psychological Bulletin, 26, 1–14.Google Scholar

Bruce, D. (1994). Lashley and the problem of serial order. American Psychologist, 49, 93–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bruce, D. (1996). Lashley, Hebb, connections, and criticisms. Canadian Psychology, 37, 129–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bruce, R. H. (1930). The effect of removal of reward on the maze performance of rats. University of California Publications in Psychology, 4, 203–214.Google Scholar

Bruner, J. E., & Allport, G. W. (1940). Fifty years of change in American psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 37, 757–776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bruner, J. S. (1980). Jerome S. Bruner. In Lindzey, G. (Ed.), A history of psychology in autobiography (Vol. 7, pp. 75–151). San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman & Company.Google Scholar

Bruner, J. S., Goodnow, J. J., & Austin, G. A. (1956). A study of thinking. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar

Bruner, J. S., & Postman, L. (1949). On the perception of incongruity: A paradigm. Journal of Personality, 18, 206–223.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bruner, J. S., Postman, L., & Rodrigues, J. (1951). Expectation and the perception of color. American Journal of Psychology, 64, 216–227.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Brunswik, E. (1937). Psychology as a science of objective relations. Philosophy of Science, 4, 227–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brunswik, E. (1955). Representative design and probabilistic theory in a functional psychology. Psychological Review, 62, 193–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buckley, K. W. (1989). Mechanical man: John Broadus Watson and the beginnings of behaviorism. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar

Burks, B. S. (1939). Progress report on the committee on displaced foreign psychologists. Psychological Bulletin, 36, 188–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burtt, H. E. (1949). Review of Assessment of men. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 44, 130–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Calkins, M. W. (1926). Critical comments on the ‘Gestalt-Theorie.’ Psychological Review, 33, 135–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Camfield, T. M. (1992). The American Psychological Association and World War I: 1914 to 1919. In Evans, R. B., Sexton, V. S., & Cadawallader, T. C. (Eds.), The American Psychological Association: A historical perspective (pp. 91–118). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Campbell, D. T. (1979), A tribal model of the social system vehicle carrying scientific knowledge. Science Communication, 1, 181–201.Google Scholar

Capshew, J. H. (1986). Networks of leadership: A quantitative study of SPSSI Presidents, 1936–1986. Journal of Social Issues, 42, 75–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Capshew, J. H. & Hilgard, E. R. (1992). The power of service: World War II and professional reform in the American Psychological Association. In Evans, R. B., Sexton, V. S., & Cadwallader, T. C. (Eds.), The American Psychological Association: A historical perspective (pp. 149–175). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carpintero, H. (2004). Watson’s Behaviorism: A comparison of the two editions (1925 and 1930). History of Psychology, 7, 183–202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Carroll, D. W. (2012). The regents versus the professors: Edward Tolman’s role in the California Loyalty Oath Controversy. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 48, 218–235.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cason, H. (1924). Purposive psychology and the conditioned reflex. Psychological Review, 31, 253–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cattell, J. M. (1904). The conceptions and methods of psychology. Popular Science Monthly, 66, 179–180.Google Scholar

Cattell, J. M. (1936, April 4). Letter to Isadore Krechevsky. Drs. Nicholas and Dorothy Cummings Center for the History of Psychology, The University of Akron, Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues (SPSSI) records, box 186, folder “Correspondence, 1937–1938.”Google Scholar

Caughey, J. (1969). Farewell to California’s “Loyalty” Oath. The Pacific Historical Review, 38, 123–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chace, E. B. (1891). Anti-slavery reminiscences. Central Falls, R. I.: E. L. Freeman & Sons.Google Scholar

Chace, E. B., & Lovell, L. B. (1937). Two Quaker sisters: From the original diaries of Elizabeth Buffum Chace and Lucy Buffum Lovell. New York: Liveright Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar

Charles, E. P. (2011). Seeing minds in behavior: Descriptive mentalism. Review of General Psychology, 15, 267–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Christian Register Association (1913, April 24). Religious intelligence. The Christian Register, 91, 404–405.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (1959). Review of Verbal Behavior. Language, 35, 26–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coover, J. E. (1915). Proceedings of the joint meeting of the American Psychological Association and the Division of Psychology of Section H of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, San Francisco, August 3, 4, and 5, 1915. Psychological Bulletin, 12, 313–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crannell, C. W. (1971, March 8). Letter to David Krantz. Papers relating to E. C. Tolman (1886–1959), [PSY/TOL/1/9, Student and colleague views of Tolman], Wellcome Library, London.Google Scholar

Crutchfield, R. S., Krech, D., & Tryon, R. C. (1960). Edward Chace Tolman: A life of scientific and social purpose. Science, 131, 714–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crutchfield, R. S. & Tolman, E. C. (1940). Multiple-variable design for experiments involving interaction of behavior. Psychological Review, 47, 38–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Daily Californian (1956, March 19). Back pay granted faculty members (Papers related to the loyalty oath controversy (Box 3, Folder: Clippings), The Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar

Dallenbach, K. M. (1946). The emergency committee in psychology, National Research Council. The American Journal of Psychology, 59, 496–582.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Danziger, K. (1980). The history of introspection reconsidered. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 16, 241–262.3.0.CO;2-O>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Darwin, C. (1859). On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. London: John Murray.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Darwin, C. (1872). The expression of the emotions in man and animals. London: John Murray.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

de Waal, C. (2011). Preface. In Charles, E. P. (Ed.), A new look at New Realism: The psychology and philosophy of E. B. Holt (pp. xiii–xxvii). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar

Dewey, J. (1896). The reflex arc concept in psychology. Psychological Review, 3, 357–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dewey, J. (1912). A reply to Professor Royce’s critique of instrumentalism. The Philosophical Review, 21, 69–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dewsbury, D. A. (1990). Early interactions between animal psychologists and animal activists and the founding of the APA committee on precautions in animal experimentation. American Psychologist, 43, 315–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dewsbury, D. A. (1996). Robert M. Yerkes: A psychobiologist with a plan. In Kimble, G. A., Boneau, C. A., & Wertheimer, M. (Eds.), Portraits of pioneers in psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 87–105). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Dewsbury, D. A. (1998). Animal psychology in journals, 1911 to 1927: Another look at the snark. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 112, 400–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dewsbury, D. A. (2002). The Chicago five: A family group of integrative psychobiologists. History of Psychology, 5, 16–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Deutsch, M. E. (1926). (Ed.). The abundant life: Benjamin Ide Wheeler. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Dieffenbach, A. C. (1921, April 21). (Ed.). What they do at Norfolk House. The Christian Register, 100, 378–379.Google Scholar

Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Park, J. Y. (2014). An incomplete list of eminent psychologists of the modern era. Archives of Scientific Psychology, 2, 20–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dollard, J., Miller, N. E., Doob, L. W., Mowrer, O. H., & Sears, R. R. (1939). Frustration and aggression. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Douglass, J. A. (2000). The California idea and American higher education: 1850 to the 1960 master plan. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Duncker, K. & Krechevsky, I. (1939). On solution-achievement. Psychological Review, 46, 176–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dunlap, K. (1912). The case against introspection. Psychological Review, 19, 404–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dunlap, K. (1930). Knight Dunlap. In Murchison, C. (Ed.), A history of psychology in autobiography (Vol. 2, pp. 35–61). Worcester, MA: Clark University Press.Google Scholar

Ebbinghaus, H. (1913). Memory: A contribution to experimental psychology (Translated by Ruger, Henry A. and Bussenius, Clara E.). New York City: Teachers College, Columbia University. (Originally published 1885).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Estes, W. K. (1972). Reinforcement in human behavior. American Scientist, 60, 723–729.Google ScholarPubMed

Estes, W. K. (1988). Learning. In Hilgard, E. R. (Ed.), Fifty years of psychology: Essays in honor of Floyd Ruch (pp. 75–92). Boston: Scott Foresman.Google Scholar

Evans, R. B. (1990). The scientific and psychological positions of E.B. Titchener. In Leys, R. & Evans, R. B. (Eds.), Defining American psychology: The correspondence between Adolf Meyer and E.B. Titchener (pp. 1–39). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Feest, U. (2005a). Giving up instincts in psychology, or not? In Mulberger, A. & Gomez-Zuniga, B. (Eds.), Recent contributions to the history of the human sciences (pp. 242–259). Munich: Profil Verlag.Google Scholar

Feest, U. (2005b). Operationism in psychology: What the debate is about, what the debate should be about. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 41, 131–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fernberger, S. W. (1921). Further statistics of the American Psychological Association. Psychological Bulletin, 18, 569–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fernberger, S. W. (1932). The American Psychological Association: A historical summary, 1892–1930. Psychological Bulletin, 29, 1–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Finison, L. J. (1976). Unemployment, politics, and the history of organized psychology. American Psychologist, 31, 747–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Finison, L. J. (1977). Psychologists and Spain: A historical note. American Psychologist, 32, 1080–1084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Finison, L. J. (1978). Unemployment, politics, and the history of organized psychology, II: The Psychologists League, the WPA, and the National Health Program. American Psychologist, 33, 471–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Finison, L. J. (1983). The Society for Psychological Study of Social Issues, peace action, and theories of conflict, 1936–1950. American Psychologist, 38, 1250–1252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Finison, L. J. (1986). The psychological insurgency: 1936–1945. Journal of Social Issues, 42, 21–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fisch, M. (1964). A chronicle of pragmatism, 1865–1879. Monist, 48, 441–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Freeman, L. (1950, September 7). Psychology group bars California U. New York Times, 1.Google Scholar

Freud, S. (1989). The future of an illusion. New York: Norton. (Originally published 1927).Google Scholar

Friman, P. C., Allen, K. D., Kerwin, M. L. E., & Larzelere, R. (1993). Changes in modern psychology: A citation analysis of the Kuhnian displacement thesis. American Psychologist, 48, 656–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fyhn, M., Molden, S., Witter, M. P., Moser, E. I., & Moser, M.-B. (2004). Spatial representation in the entorhinal cortex. Science, 305, 1258–1264.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Garcia, J. (1976). I. Krechevsky and I: Once upon a time at Berkeley. In Petrinovich, L. & McGaugh, J. L. (Eds.), Knowing, thinking, and believing: Festschrift for Professor David Krech (pp. 71–84). New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Garcia, J. (1981). Tilting at the paper mills of academe. American Psychologist, 36, 149–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Garcia, J. (1997). Tolman: Creative surges and dubious second thoughts. Review of Collected papers in psychology by Edward C. Tolman. PsycCRITIQUES, 42, 285–291.Google Scholar

Garcia, J., Kimeldorf, D. J., & Koelling, R. A. (1955). Conditioned taste aversion to saccharin resulting from exposure to gamma radiation. Science, 122, 157–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gardner, D. P. (1967). The California oath controversy. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Gardner, H. (1985). The mind’s new science: A history of the cognitive revolution. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Garvey, C. R. (1929). List of American psychology laboratories. Psychological Bulletin, 26, 652–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gigerenzer, G. (2001). Ideas in exile: The struggles of an upright man. In Hammond, K. R. & Stewart, T. R. (Eds.), The essential Brunswik: Beginnings, explications, applications (pp. 445–452). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gleitman, H. (1991). Edward Chace Tolman: A life of scientific and social purpose. In Kimble, G. A., Wertheimer, M., & White, C. L. (Eds.), Portraits of pioneers in psychology (pp. 226–241). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Good, J., & Still, A. (1986). Tolman and the tradition of direct perception. British Journal of Psychology, 77, 533–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goodenough, F. L. (1933). A note on Tolman’s ‘disproof’ of Thorndike’s law of effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 16, 459–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goodwin, C. J. (2005). Reorganizing the Experimentalists: The origins of the Society of Experimental Psychologists. History of Psychology, 8, 347–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goodwin, C. J. (2006). Edmund Clark Sanford and the consequences of loyalty. In Dewsbury, D. A., Benjamin, L. T. Jr., & Wertheimer, M. (Eds.), Portraits of pioneers in psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 3–17). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Gottlieb, G. (1972). Zing-Yang Kuo: Radical scientific philosopher and innovative experimentalist (1898–1970). Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 30, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gottsberger, W. S. (1882). Proceedings at the annual meeting of the national civil service issues. New York: National Civil Service Reform League.Google Scholar

Grant, U. S. (1894). Personal memoirs of U. S. Grant. New York: Jenkins and McCowan.Google Scholar

Green, C. D. (1992). Of immortal mythological beasts: Operationism in psychology. Theory and Psychology, 2, 291–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Green, C. D. (1996). Where did the word “cognitive” come from anyway? Canadian Psychology, 37, 31–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Green, C. D. (2009). Darwinian theory, functionalism, and the first American psychological revolution. American Psychologist, 64, 75–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Greenwood, J. D. (1999). Understanding the “cognitive revolution” in psychology. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 35, 1–22.3.0.CO;2-4>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greenwood, J. D. (2009). A conceptual history of psychology. Boston: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Grold, J. D. (1961). A History of the University of California Psychology Department at Berkeley, University of California, Berkeley Education Psychology Library.Google Scholar

Guthrie, E. R. (1933). On the nature of psychological explanations. Psychological Review, 40, 124–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guthrie, E. R. (1935). The psychology of learning. New York: Harper and Brothers.Google Scholar

Guthrie, E. R. (1937). Tolman on associative learning. Psychological Review, 44, 525–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hafting, T., Fyhn, M., Molden, S., Moser, M.-B., & Moser, E. I. (2005). Microstructure of a spatial map in the entorhinal cortex. Nature, 436, 801–806.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Haggbloom, S. J., Warnick, R., Warnick, J. E., Jones, V. K., Yarbrough, G. L., Russell, T. M…Monte, E. (2012). The 100 most eminent psychologists of the 20^th century. Review of General Psychology, 6, 139–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hale, M. Jr. (1980). Human science and social order: Hugo Münsterberg and the origins of applied psychology. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar

Hamilton, D. A., Akers, K. G., Johnson, T. E., Rice, J. P., Candelaria, F. T., Sutherland, R. J…Redhead, E. S. (2008), The relative influence of place and direction in the Morris water task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 34, 31–53.Google ScholarPubMed

Hammond, K. R. (2001). Comment: A meeting of minds. In Hammond, K. R. & Stewart, T. R. (Eds.), The essential Brunswik: Beginnings, explications, applications (pp. 15–16). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Handler, L. (2001). Assessment of men: Personality assessment goes to war by the Office of Strategic Services Assessment Staff. Journal of Personality Assessment, 76, 558–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hanson, S. J. (1964). Edward Chace Tolman at Northwestern University 1915–1918. Papers relating to E. C. Tolman (1886–1959), [PSY/TOL/1/5, Miscellaneous], Wellcome Library, London.Google Scholar

Harlow, H. F., Harlow, M. K., & Meyer, D. R. (1950). Learning motivated by a manipulation drive. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40, 228–234.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Harper, R. S. (1949). Tables of American doctorates in psychology. The American Journal of Psychology, 62, 579–587.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Harper, R. S. (1950). The first psychological laboratory. Isis, 41, 158–161.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Harrell, W., & Harrison, R. (1938). The rise and fall of behaviorism. The Journal of General Psychology, 18, 367–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harris, B. (1986). Reviewing 50 years of the psychology of social issues. Journal of Social Issues, 42, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harris, B. (2009). Jewish quotas in clinical psychology? The Journal of Clinical Psychology and the scandal of 1945. Review of General Psychology, 13, 252–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harris, M. (2014). Five came back: A story of Hollywood and the Second World War. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar

Hartman, G. W. (1939, September 29). Letter to Edward Tolman. Drs. Nicholas and Dorothy Cummings Center for the History of Psychology, The University of Akron, Edward C. Tolman papers, box M132.Google Scholar

Heale, M. J. (1986). Red scare politics: California’s campaign against Un-American activities, 1940–1970. Journal of American Studies, 20, 5–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hebb, D. O. (1949). The organization of behavior: A neuropsychological theory. New York: Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar

Hebb, D. O. (1951). The role of neurological ideas in psychology. Journal of Personality, 20, 39–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hebb, D. O. (1959). Karl Spencer Lashley: 1890–1958. The American Journal of Psychology, 72, 142–150.Google Scholar

Hebb, D. O. (1980). D. O. Hebb. In Lindzey, G. (Ed.), A history of psychology in autobiography (Vol. 7, pp. 273–303). San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman & Co.Google Scholar

Heft, H. (2011). Holt’s “recession of the stimulus” and the emergence of the “situation” in psychology. In Charles, E. P. (Ed.), A new look at new realism: The psychology and philosophy of E. B. Holt (pp. 191–219). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar

Henle, M. (1984). Robert M. Ogden and Gestalt psychology in America. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 20, 9–19.3.0.CO;2-U>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Herrick, C. J. (1925). The natural history of purpose. Psychological Review, 32, 417–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Herrnstein, R. J. (1973). Introduction to John B. Watson’s comparative psychology. In Henle, M., Jaynes, J., & Sullivan, J. J. (Eds.), Historical conceptions of psychology (pp. 98–115). New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Hildebrand, J. H. (1950, May 4). Statement to Academic Senate. Joel Henry Hildebrand papers [BANC/MSS 71/69]. The Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar

Hilgard, E. R. (1948). Tolman’s sign-gestalt theory. In Hilgard, E. R. (Ed.), Theories of learning (pp. 261–293). East Norwalk, CT: Appleton-Century-Crofts.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hilgard, E. R. (1987). Psychology in America: A historical survey. San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar

Hill, C. W. & Thune, L. E. (1952). Place and response learning in the white rat under simplified and mutually isolated conditions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43, 289–297.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hoffman, L. E. (1992). American psychologists and wartime research on Germany, 1941–1945. American Psychologist, 47, 264–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hornstein, G. A. (1992). The return of the repressed: Psychology’s problematic relations with psychoanalysis, 1909–1960. American Psychologist, 47, 254–263.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Holt, E. B. (1915). The Freudian wish and its place in ethics. New York: Henry Holt and Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holt, E. B. (1912). The place of illusory experience in a realistic world. In Holt, E. B., Marvin, W. T., Montague, W. P., Perry, R. B., Pitkin, W. B., & Spaulding, E. G., The new realism: Cooperative studies in philosophy (pp. 303–373). New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar

Holt, E. B., Marvin, M. T., Montague, W. P., Perry, R. B., Pitkin, W. B., & Spaulding, E. G. (1910). The program and first platform of six realists. Journal of Philosophy, Psychology, and Scientific Methods, 7, 393–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Howison, G. H. (1896). Psychology and logic: Further views. Psychological Review, 3, 652–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hubel, D. H., & Wiesel, T. N. (1962). Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat’s visual cortex. Journal of Physiology, 160, 106–154.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hull, C. L. (1934a). The concept of the habit-family hierarchy, and maze learning. Part I. Psychological Review, 41, 33–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hull, C. L. (1934b). The concept of the habit-family hierarchy, and maze learning. Part II. Psychological Review, 41, 134–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hull, C. L. (1943a). Principles of behavior: An introduction to behavior theory. Oxford, England: Appleton-Century.Google Scholar

Hull, C. L. (1943b). A postscript concerning intervening variables. Psychological Review, 50, 540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hull, C. L. (1952). Clark L. Hull. In Boring, E. G., Werner, H., Langfeld, H. S., & Yerkes, R. M. (Eds.), A history of psychology in autobiography (Vol. 4, pp. 143–162). Worcester, MA: Clark University Press.Google Scholar

Hunt, W. A. (1948). Review of Assessment of men: Selection of Personnel for the Office of Strategic Services. Psychological Bulletin, 45, 460–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hurd, D. H. (1890). History of Middlesex County with biographical sketches of many of its pioneers and prominent men. Philadelphia: J. W. Lewis & Co.Google Scholar

Indian Rights Association. (1910). The annual report of the executive committee of the Indian Rights Association. Philadelphia: Office of Indian Rights Association.Google Scholar

Innis, N. K. (1987). Edward C. Tolman: Comparative psychologist? In Tobach, E. (Ed.), Historical perspectives and the international status of comparative psychology (pp. 119–126), Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Innis, N. K. (1992a). Tolman and Tryon: Early research on the inheritance of the ability to learn. American Psychologist, 47, 190–197.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Innis, N. K. (1992b). Lessons from the controversy over the loyalty oath at the University of California. Minerva, 30, 337–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Innis, N. K. (1998). David Krech: Scientist and social activist. In Kimble, G. A. & Wertheimer, M. (Eds.), Portraits of pioneers in psychology (pp. 294–306). Washington, DC: APA.Google Scholar

Innis, N. K. (2003). William McDougall: A major tragedy? In Kimble, G. A. & Wertheimer, M. (Eds.), Portraits of pioneers in psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 91–108). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Innis, N. K. (2004). Having fun. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar

Jacobs, J., Weidemann, C. T., Miller, J. F., Solway, A., Burke, J. F., Wei, X-X…Kahana, M. J. (2013). Direct recordings of grid-like neuronal activity in human spatial navigation. Nature Neuroscience, 16, 1188–1191.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology (Vol. 1). London: MacMillan and Company.Google Scholar

James, W. (1892, February 21). Letter to Münsterberg. In Perry, R. B. (1935), The thought and character of William James, Volume II: Philosophy and psychology, London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

James, W. (1894, April 2). Letter to G. Howison. In Perry, R. B. (1935), The thought and character of William James, Vol. II. Philosophy and psychology. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

James, W. (1898, August 26). Philosophical conceptions and practical results. Paper presented at the Philosophical Union, The University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar

James, W. (1904a). Does consciousness exist? Journal of Philosophy, Psychology, and Scientific Methods, 1, 477–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

James, W. (1904b, July 31). Letter to James Ward. In Perry, R. B. (1935), The thought and character of William James, Volume II: Philosophy and psychology, London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

James, W. (1906, June 28). Letter to Hugo Münsterberg. In Perry, R. B. (1935), The thought and character of William James, Volume II: Philosophy and psychology, London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

James, W. (1907). Pragmatism: A new name for some old ways of thinking. New York: Longman’s Green, and Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

James, W. (1909). A pluralistic universe. New York: Longmans, Green, and Company.Google Scholar

Jeffress, L. A. (1951). (Ed.). Cerebral mechanisms in behavior: The Hixon symposium. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Johanssen, D. (1933). Review of Purposive behavior in animals and men. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 28, 222–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnson, M. S. (1993). The second gold rush: Oakland and the East Bay in World War II. Berkeley and Los Angeles, California: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Kantor, J. R. (1920). A functional interpretation of human instincts. Psychological Review, 27, 50–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kent, M. T. (2003). The closing circle: A memoir. Berkeley, California: Creative Arts Book Company.Google Scholar

Kent, M. T. (2004). The Loyalty Oath at the University of California. Interview conducted by Germaine LaBerge in 1999, Regional Oral History Office, The Bancroft Library, University of California at Berkeley.Google Scholar

Kent, M. T. (2004). The Loyalty Oath at the University of California, interview conducted by Germaine LaBerge in 1999, Regional Oral History Office, The Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar

Kerr, C. (2003). The gold and the blue: A personal memoir of the University of California, 1947–1967 (Vol. 2). Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Keyssar, A. (1985). Social change in Massachusetts in the Gilded Age. In Tager, J. & Ifkovic, J. W. (Eds.), Massachusetts in the Gilded Age (pp. 132–147). Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar

Kimmel, P. R. (1997). A history of Division 9 (Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues). In Dewsbury, D. A. (Ed.), Unification through division: Histories of the divisions of the American Psychological Association (Vol. 2, pp. 9–53). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kimmel, P. R. (2011). SPSSI and peace-building: A participant’s perspective. Journal of Social Issues, 67, 122–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kinnaman, A. J. (1902). Mental life of two macacus rhesus monkeys in captivity. I., The American Journal of Psychology, 13, 98–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

King, D. B., Montanez-Ramirez, L. M., & Wertheimer, M. (1996). Barbara Stoddard Burks: Pioneer behavioral geneticist and humanitarian. In Kimble, G. A., Boneau, C. A., & Wertheimer, M. (Eds.), Portraits of pioneers in psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 213–225). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

King, D. B., & Wertheimer, M. (2005). Max Wertheimer & Gestalt theory. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar

Kirkwood, J. G., Wulf, O. R., & Epstein, P. S. (1952). Richard Chace Tolman, 1881–1948. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar

Kline, L. W. (1899). Methods in animal psychology. The American Journal of Psychology, 10, 256–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koch, S. (1941). The logical character of the motivation concept. I. Psychological Review, 48, 15–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koch, S. (1959). Epilogue. In Koch, S. (Ed.), Psychology: A study of a science (Vol. 3, pp. 729–788). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Koffka, K. (1922). Perception: An introduction to Gestalt-theorie. Psychological Bulletin, 19, 531–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koffka, K. (1933). Review of Purposive behavior in animals and men. Psychological Bulletin, 30, 440–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Köhler, W. (1925). The mentality of apes (Translated from the second revised edition by Winter, Ella). New York: Harcourt, Brace.Google Scholar

Köhler, W. (1943). A perspective on American psychology. Psychological Review, 50, 77–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Köhler, W. (1959). Gestalt psychology today, American Psychologist, 14, 727–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kosslyn, S. M., Pick, H. L. Jr., & Fariello, G. R. (1974), Cognitive maps in children and men. Child Development, 45, 707–716.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Krantz, D. L., & Wiggins, L. (1973). Personal and impersonal channels of recruitment in the growth of theory. Human Development, 16, 133–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krech, D. (1950). Dynamic systems, psychological fields, and hypothetical constructs. Psychological Review, 57, 783–790.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Krech, D. (1959). Karl Friedrich Muenzinger: 1885–1958. The American Journal of Psychology, 72, 477–479.Google Scholar

Krech, D. (1967). Introduction to the second printing. In Tolman, E. C., Purposive behavior in animals and men (pp. xi–xvi). New York: Irvington Publishers. Inc.Google Scholar

Krech, D. (1974). David Krech. In Lindzey, G. (Ed.), A history of psychology in autobiography (Vol. 6, pp. 221–250). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krech, D., & Cartwright, D. (1956). On SPSSI’s first twenty years. American Psychologist, 11, 470–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krech, D. & Crutchfield, R. S. (1948). Perceiving the world, In Krech, D. & Crutchfield, R. S. (Eds.), Theory and problems of social psychology (pp. 76–109). New York: McGraw-Hill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krechevsky, I. (1932). “Hypotheses” in rats. Psychological Review, 39, 516–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krechevsky, I. (1933). The docile nature of “hypotheses.” Journal of Comparative Psychology, 15, 429–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krechevsky, I. (1935). Brain mechanisms and “hypotheses.” Journal of Comparative Psychology, 19, 425–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krechevsky, I. (1936, no date). Letter to members of the American Psychological Association. Drs. Nicholas and Dorothy Cummings Center for the History of Psychology, The University of Akron, Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues (SPSSI) records, box 186, folder 2.Google Scholar

Krechevsky, I. (1940). Notes for SPSSI members: Minutes of the fourth annual meeting of the society, September 1939, Stanford University. The Journal of Social Psychology, 11, 199–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kropff, E., Carmichael, J. E., Moser, M.-B., & Moser, E. I. (2015). Speed cells in the medial entorhinal cortex. Nature, 523, 419–424.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Krohn, W. O. (1892). Facilities in experimental psychology at various German universities. The American Journal of Psychology, 4, 585–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kruglanski, A. W., Chernikova, M., Rosenzweig, E., & Kopetz, C. (2014). On motivational readiness. Psychological Review, 121, 367–388.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Kuklick, B. (1977). The rise of American philosophy: Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1860–1930. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Kuo, K.-Y. (1921). Giving up instincts in psychology. Journal of Philosophy, 18, 645–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kuo, K.-Y. (1922). How are instincts acquired? Psychological Review, 29, 344–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kuo, K.-Y. (1924). A psychology without heredity. Psychological Review, 31, 427–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kuo, K.-Y. (1928). The fundamental error of the concept of purpose and the trial and error fallacy. Psychological Review, 35, 414–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kuo, Z.-Y. (1976). The dynamics of behavior development. Oxford: Plenum.Google Scholar

Lachman, S. J. (1998). Ross Stagner (1909–1997). American Psychologist, 53, 483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ladd, G. T. (1894). President’s address before the New York meeting of the American Psychological Association. Psychological Review, 1, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Landau, B., Spelke, E., & Gleitman, H. (1984). Spatial knowledge in a young blind child. Cognition, 16, 225–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Landy, F. J. (1992). Hugo Münsterberg: Victim or visionary? American Psychologist, 77, 787–802.Google Scholar

Lane, G. (1961). The Eastern Psychological Association: 1986–1960. American Psychologist, 16, 249–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Langfeld, H. (1945). Symposium on operationism. Psychological Review, 52, 241–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Langfeld, H. S., & Allport, F. H. (1916). Memory and the learning process. In Langfeld, H. S. & Allport, F. H., An elementary laboratory course in psychology (2nd rev. ed., pp. 122–127). Boston, MA: Houghton, Mifflin, and Company.Google Scholar

Langston, R. F., Ainge, J. A., Couey, J. J., Canto, C. B., Bjerknes, T. L., Witter, M. P…Moser, M-B. (2010). Development of the spatial representation system in the rat. Science, 328, 1576–1580.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Larsen, R. (2008). Jane Loevinger (1918–2008). American Psychologist, 63, 618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lashley, K. S. (1918). A simple maze: With data on the relation of the distribution of practice to the rate of learning. Psychobiology, 1, 353–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lashley, K. S. (1924). Studies of cerebral function in learning VI: The theory that synaptic resistance is reduced by the passage of the nerve impulse. Psychological Review, 31, 369–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lashley, K. S. (1929). Brain mechanisms and intelligence: A quantitative study of injuries to the brain. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lashley, K. S. (1930). Basic neural mechanisms in behavior. Psychological Review, 37, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lashley, K. S. (1951). The problem of serial order in behavior. In Jeffress, L. A. (Ed.), Cerebral mechanisms in behavior: The Hixon symposium (pp. 112–146). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Leahey, T. (1992). The mythical revolutions of American psychology. American Psychologist, 47, 308–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leary, D. E. (1987). From act psychology to probabilistic functionalism: The place of Egon Brunswik in the history of psychology. In Ash, M. G. & Woodward, W. R. (Eds.), Psychology in twentieth-century thought and society (pp. 115–142). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Levin, M. (1998). Kurt Lewin: His psychology and a daughter’s recollections. In Kimble, G. A. & Wertheimer, M. (Eds.), Portraits of pioneers in psychology (pp. 105–118). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Leytham, G. W. H. (1962). In memory of Edward Chace Tolman (1886–1959). Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, 49, 21–28.Google Scholar

Levine, D. O. (1988). The American college and the culture of aspiration, 1915–1940. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Lindsay, R. B. (1937). A critique of operationalism in physics. Philosophy of Science, 4, 456–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lindsley, D. B., & Harrell, T. W. (1964). History of the Western Psychological Association. American Psychologist, 19, 290–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lomax, E. (1977). The Laura Spelman Rockefeller Memorial: Some of its contributions to early research in child development. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 13, 283–293.3.0.CO;2-J>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Long, E. R. (1982). Earl Warren and the politics of anti-communism. Pacific Historical Review, 51, 51–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lovejoy, A. (1930). The revolt against dualism: An inquiry concerning the existence of ideas. Chicago: Open Court Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Lubek, I., & Apfelbaum, E. (1987). Neo-behaviorism and the Garcia effect: A social psychology of science approach to the history of a paradigm clash. In Ash, M. G. & Woodward, W. R. (Eds.), Psychology in twentieth-century thought and society (pp. 59–91). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

MacCorquodale, K., & Meehl, P. E. (1948). On a distinction between hypothetical constructs and intervening variables. Psychological Review, 55, 95–107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

MacCorquodale, K., & Meehl, P. E. (1954). Edward C. Tolman. In Estes, W. K., Koch, S., MacCorquodale, K., Meehl, P. E., Mueller, C. G. Jr., Schoenfeld, W. N., & Verplanck, W. S. (Eds.), Modern learning theory: A critical analysis of five examples (pp. 177–266). East Norwalk, CT: Appleton-Century-Crofts.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Macfarlane, J. W. (1967). Psychology. In Stadtman, V. A. (Ed.), The Centennial Record of the University of California, 1868–1968 (pp. 99–100). Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar

Mackintosh, N. J. (1986). Tolman and modern conditioning theory. British Journal of Psychology, 77, 517–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maguire, E. A., Gadian, D. G., Johnsrude, I. S., Good, C. D., Ashburner, J., Frackowiak, R. S. J., & Frith, C. D. (2000). Navigation-related structural change in the hippocampi of taxi drivers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 97, 4398–4403.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mandler, G. M. (2002). Origins of the cognitive (r)evolution. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 38, 339–353.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Marquis, D. G. (1944). The mobilization of psychologists for war service. Psychological Bulletin, 41, 469–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maslow, A. M. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50, 370–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Massachusetts Institute of Technology. (1898). Annual report of the president and treasurer. Boston: Rockwell and Churchill Press.Google Scholar

Mayer, R. W. (1972). Psychology, psychologists, and the University of California: The first twenty years, 1880–1900. Proceedings of the 80th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, 777–778.Google Scholar

McCulloch, W. S., & Pitts, W. (1943). A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, 5, 115–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McDougall, W. (1908). An introduction to social psychology. London: Methuen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McDougall, W. (1911). Body and mind: A history and defense of animism. London: Methuen.Google Scholar

McDougall, W. (1921/1922). The use and abuse of instincts in social psychology. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 16, 285–333.Google Scholar

McDougall, W. (1923). Purposive or mechanical psychology? Psychological Review, 30, 273–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McDougall, W. (1926). Men or robots? II. In Murchison, C. (Ed.), Psychologies of 1925 (pp. 293–305). Worcester, MA: Clark University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McGaugh, J. L. (1972). Student questionnaire. Papers relating to E. C. Tolman (1886–1959), [PSY/TOL/1/9, Student and colleague views of Tolman], Wellcome Library, London.Google Scholar

McGaugh, J. L. (2004). James L. McGaugh. In Squire, L. (Ed.), The history of neuroscience in autobiography (Vol. 4, pp. 410–450). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Menand, L. (2001). The metaphysical club: A story of ideas in America. New York: Farrar, Straus, & Giroux.Google Scholar

Miller, G. A. (1951). Language and communication. New York: McGraw-Hill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Miller, G. A. (1975). Some comments on competence and performance. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 263, 201–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miller, G. A. (1989). George A. Miller. In Lindzey, G. (Ed.), A history of psychology in autobiography (Vol. 8, pp. 391–418). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Miller, G. A., Galanter, E., & Pribram, K. H. (1960). Plans and the structure of behavior. New York: Holt.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miller, N. E. (1935). A reply to ‘Sign-gestalt or conditioned reflex?’ Psychological Review, 42, 280–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miles, W. R. (1925). Proceedings of the third annual meeting of the Western Psychological Association. Psychological Bulletin, 22, 325–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miles, W. R. (1926). Proceedings of the fifth annual meeting of the Western Psychological Association. Psychological Bulletin, 23, 293–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mills, W. (1899). The nature of animal intelligence and the methods of investigating it. Psychological Review, 6, 262–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Montague, W. P. (1937). The story of American realism. Philosophy, 12, 140–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moore, J. W. (1980). A memorial to A. H. Black. Physiological Psychology, 8, 148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morawski, J. G. (1986a). Psychologists for society and societies for psychologists: SPSSI’s place among professional organizations. Journal of Social Issues, 42, 111–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morawski, J. G. (1986b). Knowledge and behavior at Yale’s Institute of Human Relations. Isis, 77, 219–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morris, R. (1984). Developments of a water-maze procedure for studying spatial learning in the rat. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 11, 47–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Morris, R. G. M., Garrud, P., Rawlins, J. N. P., & O’Keefe, J. (1982). Place navigation in rats with hippocampal lesions. Nature, 297, 681–683.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Muenzinger, K. F. (1927). Physical and psychological reality. Psychological Review, 34, 220–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Münsterberg, H. (1894a). Studies from the Harvard Psychology laboratory I. Psychological Review, 1, 34–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Münsterberg, H. (1894b). The problems of experimental psychology. In Cattell, J. M., Proceedings of the American Psychological Association. New York: MacMillan and Company.Google Scholar

Münsterberg, H. (1899). Psychology and education. In Münsterberg, H., Psychology and life (pp. 100–144). Boston, MA: Houghton, Mifflin, and Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Münsterberg, H. (1907). Psychology and industrial efficiency. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar

Münsterberg, H. (1915). Scope and methods of causal psychology. In Münsterberg, H., Psychology: General and applied (pp. 43–58). New York: D. Appleton and Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Murchison, C. (1926). Psychologies of 1925. Worcester, MA: Clark University.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Murray, H. A., & Mackinnon, D. W. (1946). Assessment of OSS personnel. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 10, 76–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

National Alliance of Unitarian and Other Christian Women (1910). Manual. New York: The Knickerbocker Press.Google Scholar

Newell, A., Shaw, J. C., & Simon, H. (1958). Elements of a theory of problem solving. Psychological Review, 84, 231–259.Google Scholar

Newton, J. (2006). Justice for all: Earl Warren and the nation he made. New York, NY: Riverhead Books.Google Scholar

Neylan, J. F. (1950, March 31). Excerpts from the minutes of the Board of Regents of the University of California, Regular Session. University Archives, The Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar

O’Donnell, J. M. (1985). The origins of behaviorism: American psychology, 1870–1920, New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar

Office of Strategic Services. (1945). Personnel file for Edward C. Tolman, National Archives, (Record Group 226).Google Scholar

Office of Strategic Services Assessment Staff (1948). Assessment of men: Selection of personnel for the Office of Strategic Services. New York: Rinehart.Google Scholar

O’Keefe, J. (1976). Place units in the hippocampus of the freely moving rat. Experimental Neurology, 51, 78–109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

O’Keefe, J. & Dostrovsky, J. (1971). The hippocampus as a spatial map. Preliminary evidence from unit activity in the freely-moving rat. Brain Research, 34, 171–175CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

O’Keefe, J., & Nadel, L. (1978). The hippocampus as a cognitive map. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Olson, M. C. (1939). Proceedings of the forty-seventh annual meeting of the American Psychological Association. Psychological Bulletin, 36, 740–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Olton, D. S. (1992). Tolman’s cognitive analyses: Predecessors of current approaches in psychology. American Psychologist, 121, 427–428.Google ScholarPubMed

Palermo, D. S. (1971). Is a scientific revolution taking place in psychology? Science Studies, 1, 135–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Paterson, D. G. (1936a). Proceedings of the forty-fourth meeting of the American Psychological Association. Psychological Bulletin, 33, 677–816.Google Scholar

Paterson, D. G. (1936b, April 21). Letter to Isadore Krechevsky. Drs. Nicholas and Dorothy Cummings Center for the History of Psychology, The University of Akron, Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues (SPSSI) records, box 186, folder “Correspondence, 1937–1938.”Google Scholar

Paterson, D. G. (1937). Proceedings of the forty-fifth annual meeting of the American Psychological Association. Psychological Bulletin, 34, 639–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peirce, C. S. (1868). Questions concerning certain faculties claimed for man. Journal of Speculative Philosophy, 2, 103–114.Google Scholar

Peirce, C. S. (1878). How to make our ideas clear. Popular Science Monthly, 12, 286–302.Google Scholar

Perry, R. B. (1918). Docility and purposiveness. Psychological Review, 25, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Perry, R. B. (1935). The thought and character of William James (Vol. 1). London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Perry, R. B. (1943). James the psychologist—as a philosopher sees him. Psychological Review, 50, 122–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peterson, C., Park, N., & Castro, C. A. (2011). Assessment for the U. S. Army comprehensive soldier fitness program: The global assessment tool. American Psychologist, 66, 10–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Petrinovich, L., & McGaugh, J. L. (1976), Introduction. In Petrinovich, L. & McGaugh, J. L. (Eds.), Knowing, thinking, and believing: Festschrift for Professor David Krech (pp. 1–8). New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pickren, W. E., & Rutherford, A. (2010). A history of modern psychology in context. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Postman, L., Bruner, J. S., & McGinnies, E. (1948). Personal values as selective factors in perception. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 43, 142–154.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Redish, A. D. (2016). Vicarious trial and error. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 17, 147–159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Restle, F. (1957). Discrimination in mazes: A resolution of the “place versus response” controversy. Psychological Review, 64, 217–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rilling, M. (2000). Zing-Yang Kuo. In Kazdin, A. E. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 465). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Ritchie, B. F. (1959, December 17). Remarks at a meeting held in memory of Edward C. Tolman. Papers relating to E. C. Tolman (1886–1959), [PSY/TOL/1/11], Wellcome Library, London.Google Scholar

Ritchie, B. F. (1964). Edward Chace Tolman, 1886–1959. Biographical memoirs. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar

Roback, A. A. (1937). Who’s who in behaviorism. Cambridge, MA: Sci-Art Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roback, A. A. (1952). The structuralism of Titchener. In Roback, A. A. (Ed.), History of American psychology (pp. 180–191). New York: Library Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roback, A. A. (1960, January 22). Letter to Geoffrey Leytham. Papers relating to E. C. Tolman (1886–1959), [PSY/TOL/1/8, Roback correspondence], Wellcome Library, London.Google Scholar

Roberts, W. H. (1928). Some queries as to Kuo’s doctrine of passivity. Psychological Review, 35, 531–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Robins, R. W., Gosling, S. D., & Craik, K. H. (1999). An empirical analysis of trends in psychology. American Psychologist, 54, 117–128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Rose, A. C. (2011). The invention of uncertainty in American psychology: Intellectual conflict and rhetorical resolution, 1890–1930. History of Psychology, 14, 356–382.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Rosenblueth, A., Weiner, N., & Bigelow, J. (1943). Behavior, purpose and teleology. Philosophy of Science, 10, 18–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rosenfeld, S. (2012). Subversives: The FBI’s war on student radicals, and Reagan’s rise to power. New York: Picador.Google Scholar

Rosenzweig, M. R. (2006). Mark R. Rosenzweig. In Squire, L. R. (Ed.), The history of neuroscience in autobiography (Vol. 5, pp. 613–654). Burlington, MA: The Society for Neuroscience.Google Scholar

Royce, J. (1892). The inner world and its meaning. In Royce, J., The spirit of modern philosophy: An essay in the form of lectures (pp. 341–380). Boston, MA: Houghton, Mifflin, and Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rudmin, F. (1991). Seventeen early peace psychologists. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 31, 12–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rumford, W. B. (1973). Oral history. Interview conducted by Joyce Henderson, Amelia R. Fry, and Edward France [BANC MSS 74 /165 c]. The Bancroft Library, University of California at Berkeley.Google Scholar

Russell, L. J. (1928). Review of The logic of modern physics. Mind, 37, 355–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Samelson, F. (1981). Struggle for scientific authority: The reception of Watson’s behaviorism, 1913–1920. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 17, 399–425.3.0.CO;2-2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Samelson, F. (1985). Organizing for the kingdom of behavior: Academic battles and organizational policies in the twenties. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 21, 33–47.3.0.CO;2-F>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Sargent, S. S., & Harris, B. (1986). Academic freedom, civil liberties, and SPSSI. Journal of Social Issues, 42, 43–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schachman, H. (2007). UC Berkeley Professor of Molecular Biology: On the Loyalty Oath Controversy, the Free Speech Movement, and Freedom in Scientific Research. Interview conducted by Ann Lage in 2000–2001, Regional Oral History Office, The Bancroft Library, University of California at Berkeley.Google Scholar

Schlesinger, K. (1991). Robert Choate Tryon: Pioneer in differential psychology. In Kimble, G. A., Wertheimer, M., & White, C. L. (Eds.), Portraits of pioneers in psychology (pp. 342–355). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Scobie, I. W. (1974). Jack B. Tenney and the “parasitic menace”: Anti-communist legislation in California 1940–1949. Pacific Historical Review, 43, 188–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scott, J. (2009). Knowledge, power, and academic freedom. Social Research, 76, 451–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schrecker, E. W. (1986). No ivory tower: McCarthyism and the universities. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar

Schrecker, E. W. (2009). Subversives, squeaky wheels, and “special obligations”: Threats to academic freedom, 1890–1960. Social Research, 76, 513–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scoville, W. B., & Milner, B. (1957). Loss of recent memory after bilateral hippocampal lesions. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 20, 11–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Seligman, E. R. A., Bennett, C. E., Dealey, J. Q., Ely, R. T., Farnam, H. W., Fetter, F. A…Weatherly, U. G. (1915). General report of the committee on academic freedom and academic tenure: Presented at the annual meeting of the association, December 1915. Bulletin of the American Association of University Professors, 1, 15–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Senate Fact-Finding Committee on Un-American Activities (1948). Fourth Report of the Senate Fact-Finding Committee on Un-American Activities. Sacramento: California State Legislature.Google Scholar

Senate Fact-Finding Committee on Un-American Activities (1951). Sixth Report of the Senate Fact-Finding Committee on Un-American Activities. Sacramento: California State Legislature.Google Scholar

Siebert, W. H. (1896). Light on the Underground Railroad. The American Historical Review, 1, 455–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Siebert, W. H. (1935). The Underground Railroad in Massachusetts. American Antiquarian Society, 45, 25–100.Google Scholar

Siebert, W. H. (1936). The Underground Railroad in Massachusetts. The New England Quarterly, 9, 447–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Silverman, R. A. (1977). Nathan Matthews: Politics of reform in Boston, 1890–1910. The New England Quarterly, 50, 626–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sisson, M. L. (1963, October 31). Letter to Geoffrey Leytham. Papers relating to E. C. Tolman (1886–1959), [PSY/TOL/1/9, Student and colleague views of Tolman], Wellcome Library, London.Google Scholar

Skinner, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms: An experimental analysis. Oxford, England: Appleton-Century.Google Scholar

Skinner, B. F. (1950). Are theories of learning necessary? Psychological Review, 57, 193–216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Skinner, B. F. (1966). Preface to the seventh printing. In The behavior of organisms: An experimental analysis. New York: Appleton-Century Crofts. (Originally published 1938).Google Scholar

Skinner, D. M., Etchegary, C. M., Ekert-Maret, E. C., Baker, C. J., Harley, C. W., Evans, J. H., & Martin, G. M. (2003). An analysis of response, direction, and place learning in an open field and T maze. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 29, 3–13.Google Scholar

Small, W. S. (1899). Notes on the psychic development of the young white rat. The American Journal of Psychology, 11, 80–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, L. D. (1982). Purpose and cognition: The limits of neorealist influence on Tolman’s psychology. Behaviorism, 10, 151–163.Google Scholar

Smith, L. D. (1986). Behaviorism and logical positivism: A reassessment of the alliance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Smith, M. B. (1999). Political psychology and peace: A half-century perspective. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 5, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sokal, M. M. (1984). The Gestalt psychologists in behaviorist America. American Historical Review, 89, 1240–1263.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Sokal, M. M. (1992). Origins and early years of the American Psychological Association. 1890–1906. American Psychologist, 47, 111–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sokal, M. M. (2009). James McKeen Cattell, Nicholas Murray Butler, and academic freedom at Columbia University, 1902–1923. History of Psychology, 12, 87–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Solstad, T., Baccara, C. N., Kropff, E., Moser, M.-B., & Moser, E. I. (2008). Representation of geometric borders in the entorhinal cortex. Science, 322, 1865–1868.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Spence, K. W. (1932). The order of eliminating blinds in maze learning. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 14, 9–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Spence, K. W. (1936). The nature of discrimination learning in animals. Psychological Review, 43, 427–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Spence, K. W. (1942). Theoretical interpretations of learning. In Moss, F. A. (Ed.), Comparative psychology (Rev. Ed., pp. 280–329). New York: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Spence, K. W. (1944). The nature of theory construction in contemporary psychology. Psychological Review, 51, 47–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Spence, K. W. (1948). The postulates and methods of “behaviorism.” Psychological Review, 55, 67–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Spence, K. W., & Lippitt, R. (1946). An experimental test of the sign-gestalt theory of trial and error learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 36, 491–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Spiers, J. H. (2011). Landscaping the Garden City: Transportation, utilities, and parks in Newton, Massachusetts, 1874–1915. Historical Geography, 39, 248–274.Google Scholar

Spillmann, J., & Spillmann, L. (1993). The rise and fall of Hugo Münsterberg. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 29, 322–338.3.0.CO;2-1>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sproul, R. G. (1954, August 12). Letter to Edward C. Tolman. The Bancroft Library, University of California at Berkeley, University Archives, CU-5.2, 91:76.Google Scholar

Stadtman, V. A. (Ed.). (1967). The Centennial Record of the University of California, 1868–1968. Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar

Stadtman, V. A. (1970). The University of California, 1868–1968. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Staff (1907, January 3). [Untitled editorial]. The Nation, 84, p. 2.Google Scholar

Stagner, R. (1986). Reminiscences about the founding of SPSSI. Journal of Social Issues, 42, 35–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stam, H. J. & Kalmanovitch, T. (1998). E. L. Thorndike and the origins of animal psychology: On the nature of the animal in psychology. American Psychologist, 53, 1135–1144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stevens, E. C. (1995). Elizabeth Buffum Chace and Lillie Chace Wyman: Motherhood as a subversive activity in nineteenth century Rhode Island. Quaker History, 84, 37–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stevens, E. C. (2003). Elizabeth Buffum Chace and Lillie Chace Wyman: A century of abolitionist, suffragist and workers’ rights activism. Jefferson, North Carolina: McFarland & Company.Google Scholar

Stevens, S. S. (1935a). The operational basis of psychology. The American Journal of Psychology, 47, 323–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stevens, S.S. (1935b). The operational definition of psychological concepts. Psychological Review, 42, 517–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stevens, S. S. (1939). Psychology and the science of science. Psychological Review, 36, 221–263.Google Scholar

Stevenson, L. L. (1979). Women anti-suffragists in the 1915 Massachusetts campaign. The New England Quarterly, 52, 80–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stewart, G. (1950). The year of the oath. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar

Strom, S. H. (1975). Leadership and tactics in the American Woman Suffrage Movement: A new perspective from Massachusetts. The Journal of American History, 62, 296–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Strube, M. J., Yost, J. H., & Bailey, J. R. (1993). William James and contemporary research on the self: The influence of pragmatism, reality, and truth. In Donnelly, M. E. (Ed.), Reinterpreting the legacy of William James (pp. 189–207). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Super, D. E. (1949). Review of Assessment of men: Selection of personnel for the Office of Strategic Services. Journal of Applied Psychology, 33, 511–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sweetser, M. F. (1889). King’s handbook of Newton Massachusetts. Boston: Moses King Corporation.Google Scholar

Tager, J. (1985). Massachusetts and the Age of Economic Revolution. In Tager, J. & Ifkovic, J. W. (Eds.), Massachusetts in the Gilded Age (pp. 3–28). Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar

Tap, B. (1992). Suppression of dissent: Academic freedom at the University of Illinois during the World War I era. Illinois Historical Journal, 85, 2–22.Google Scholar

Taube, J. S., Muller, R. U., & Ranck, J. B. Jr. (1990). Head-direction cells recorded from the postsubiculum of freely moving rats. I. Description and quantitative analysis. The Journal of Neuroscience, 10, 420–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Taylor, A. E. (1998). The Academic Senate of the University of California: Its role in the shared governance and operation of the University of California. University of California, Berkeley: Institute of Governmental Studies Press.Google Scholar

Terman, L. M. (1943). Barbara Stoddard Burks, 1903–1943. Psychological Bulletin, 40, 136–141.Google Scholar

The regents versus the professors. (1950, October 2). Life, p. 43–46.Google Scholar

Thorndike, E. L. (1898). Animal intelligence: An experimental study of associative processes in animals. Psychological Review Monograph Supplement, 2, i–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thorndike, E. L. (1899). A reply to “The nature of animal intelligence and the methods of investigating it.” Psychological Review, 6, 412–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thorndike, E. L. (1911). Animal intelligence: Experimental studies. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Thorndike, E. L. (1936). Edward Lee Thorndike. In Murchison, C. (Ed.), A history of psychology in autobiography (Vol. 3, pp. 263–270). Worcester, MA: Clark University Press.Google Scholar

Thorndike, R. L. (1991). Edward L. Thorndike: A personal and professional appreciation. In Kimble, G. A., Wertheimer, M., & White, C. L. (Eds.), Portraits of pioneers in psychology (pp. 138–151). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Thurstone, L. L. (1923). The stimulus-response fallacy in psychology. Psychological Review, 30, 354–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tinklepaugh, O. L. (1928). An experimental study of representative factors in monkeys. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 8, 197–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Titchener, E. B. (1898). The postulates of a structural psychology. The Philosophical Review, 7, 449–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Titchener, E. B. (1901–1905). Experimental psychology (Vols. 1–4). New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar

Titchener, E. B. (1909). The experimental psychology of thought. In Titchener, E. B., Lectures on the experimental psychology of the thought-processes (pp. 157–194). New York: MacMillan and Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Titchener, E. B. (1912a). Prolegomena to a study of introspection. The American Journal of Psychology, 23, 427–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Titchener, E. B. (1912b). The schema of introspection. The American Journal of Psychology, 23, 485–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tolman, E. C. (1915). Studies in memory. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Philosophy and Psychology, Harvard University. Drs. Nicholas and Dorothy Cummings Center for the History of Psychology, The University of Akron.Google Scholar

Tolman, E. C. (1916, January 28). Letter to A. A. Roback. Papers related to E. C. Tolman (1886–1959), [PSY/TOL/1/8, Roback correspondence]. Wellcome Library, London.Google Scholar

Tolman, E. C. (1917). More concerning the temporal relations between meaning and imagery. Psychological Review, 24, 114–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tolman, E. C. (1918a). Nerve process and cognition. Psychological Review, 25, 423–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tolman, E. C. (1918b). Retroactive inhibition as affected by conditions of learning. Psychological Monographs, 25, 1–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tolman, E. C. (1919a). English and mathematical abilities of a group of college students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 10, 95–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tolman, E. C. (1919b, May 27). Letter to A. A. Roback. Papers relating to E. C. Tolman (1886–1959), [PSY/TOL/1/8, Roback correspondence], Wellcome Library, London.Google Scholar

Tolman, E. C. (1920). Instinct and purpose. Psychological Review, 27, 217–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tolman, E. C. (1922a). A new formula for behaviorism, Psychological Review, 29, 44–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tolman, E. C. (1922b). Can instincts be given up in psychology? Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 17, 139–152.Google Scholar