Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-68945f75b7-zpsnj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-06T04:54:49.211Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Interdependence of Types and Values

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Paul Milgrom
Affiliation:
Stanford University, California
Get access

Summary

Most of the models in chapters 2–4 are independent private values models. Values are private if each player's value for any outcome depends only on his own type and independent if types are statistically independent. The only exceptions so far are the Jehiel–Moldovanu model of chapter 3, which discards the private values assumption, and the correlated-types example of chapter 4, which relaxes the independence assumption.

Relaxing the private values and independence assumptions raises a host of new issues. When bidders do not know their own values, the connection between bids and values is naturally weaker and the bidder with the highest value may win less often. Bidders' ignorance of their values leads us to study what information bidders are likely to acquire, whether they Will share this information or keep it secret, and whether the auctioneer can improve the outcome by gathering and disseminating information on its own. The independence assumption is an essential premise of the Myerson's lemma and the revenue equivalence theorems. Relaxing this assumption forces us to reevaluate the most basic results of auction theory.

In this chapter, we study issues raised by the two possible kinds of interdependence. Section 5.1 investigates the kinds of simplifying assumptions that are “reasonable” and “useful” in auction models. Section 5.2 explores the consequences of statistically interdependent types in an optimal auction model. Section 5.3 studies the empirically successful drainage tract model, which treats bidding for oil on tracts adjacent to a previously developed tract.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Athey, Susan (2001). “Single Crossing Properties and the Existence of Pure Strategy Equilibria in Games of Incomplete Information.” Econometrica 69(4): 861–890CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Athey, Susan (2002). “Monotone Comparative Statics Under Uncertainty.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 117(1): 187–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avery, Christopher (1998). “Strategic Jump Bidding in English Auctions.” Review of Economic Studies 65(2, No. 223): 185–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bikchandani, Sushil, Haile, Philip, and Riley, John G. (2002). “Symmetric Separating Equilibria in English Auctions.” Games and Economic Behavior 38: 19–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bulow, Jeremy, Huang, Ming and Klemperer, Paul (1999). “Toeholds and Takeovers.” Journal of Political Economy 107(3): 427–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bulow, Jeremy, and Klemperer, Paul (2002). “Prices and the Winner's Curse.” Rand Journal of Economics 33(1): 1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cremer, Jacques and McLean, Richard P. (1985). “Optimal Selling Strategies Under Uncertainty for a Discriminating Monopolist When Demands are Independent.” Econometrica 53(2): 345–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engelbrecht-Wiggans, Richard, Milgrom, Paul and Weber, Robert (1983). “Competitive Bidding with Proprietary Information.” Journal of Mathematical Economics 11: 161–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, Sanford (1981). “The Informational Role of Warranties and Private Disclosure About Product Quality.” Journal of Law and Economics: 24(3:) 461–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendricks, Kenneth, Porter, Robert and Wilson, Charles (1994). “Auctions for Oil and Gas Leases with an Informed Bidder and a Random Reservation Price.” Econometrica 63(1): 1–27Google Scholar
Hernando-Veciana, Angel (2003). “Successful Uninformed Bidding.” Games and Economic Behavior (Forthcoming)
Klemperer, Paul (1998). “Auctions with Almost Common Values: The Wallet Game and its Applications.” European Economic Review 42: 757–769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mas Colell, Andreu, Michael Whinston and Jerry Green (1995). Microeconomic Theory. New York: Oxford University Press
Maskin, Eric (1992). Auctions and Privatisation. Privatisation. H. Siebert: 115–136
McAfee, R. Preston and Reny, Philip (1982). “Correlated Information and Mechanism Design.” Econometrica 60(2): 395–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milgrom, Paul (1981a). “Good News and Bad News: Representation Theorems and Applications.” Bell Journal of Economics 12: 380–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milgrom, Paul R. (1981b). “Rational Expectations, Information Acquisition, and Competitive Bidding.” Econometrica 49(4): 921–943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milgrom, Paul and Weber, Robert J. (1982a). “A Theory of Auctions and Competitive Bidding.” Econometrica 50: 463–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milgrom, Paul and Weber, Robert J. (1982b). “The Value of Information in a Sealed-Bid Auction.” Journal of Mathematical Economics 10(1): 105–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neeman, Zvika (2001). “The Relevance of Private Information in Mechanism Design.” Boston University Working paper
Ortega-Reichert, Armando (1968). Models for Competitive Bidding Under Uncertainty. Department of Operations Research. Stanford, CA, Stanford University
Pesendorfer, Wolfgang and Swinkels, Jeroen (1997). “The Loser's Curse and Information Aggregation in Common Value Auctions.” Econometrica 65: 1247–1281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Royden, H. L. (1968). Real Analysis. New York, NY: Macmillan
Topkis, Donald (1978). “Minimizing a Submodular Function on a Lattice.” Operations Research 26: 305–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Topkis, Donald (1998). Supermodularity and Complementarity: Princeton University Press
Weverbergh, Marcel (1979). “Competitive Bidding With Asymmetric Information Reanalyzed.” Management Science 25: 291–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Robert (1967). “Competitive Bidding with Asymmetric Information.” Management Science 13: 816–820CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Robert (1969). “Competitive Bidding With Disparate Information.” Management Science 15(7): 446–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Robert (1987). Bidding. The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics. J. Eatwell, M. Milgate and P. Newman. London, MacMillan Press. 1: 238–242CrossRef

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×