Achen, Christopher H. 1978. “Measuring Representation.” American Journal of Political Science 22(3): 477–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Achen, Christopher H. and Bartels, Larry M.. 2004. “Musical Chairs: Pocketbook Voting and the Limits of Democratic Accountability.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, September 1–4.

Alda, Kristina. 2006. “Rents Likely to Rise.” The Prague Post, 4 January.Google Scholar

Althaus, Scott L. 2003. Collective Preferences in Democratic Politics: Opinion Surveys and the Will of the People. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Altman, David and Pérez-Liñán, Anibal. 2002. “Assessing the Quality of Democracy: Freedom, Competitiveness, and Participation in 18 Countries.” Democratization 9(2): 85–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, Leslie, Beck, Michael Lewis, and Stegmaier, Mary. 2003. “Post-Socialist Democratization: A Comparative Political Economy Model of the Vote for Hungary and Nicaragua.” Electoral Studies 22(3): 469–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andrews, Emily S. 2006. Pension Reform and the Development of Pension Systems: An Evaluation of World Bank Assistance. Washington, DC: The World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Appel, Hilary. 2004. A New Capitalist Order: Privatization and Ideology in Russia and Eastern Europe. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Appel, Hilary. 2005. “Anti-Communist Justice and Founding the Postcommunist Order: Lustration and Restitution in Central Europe.” East European Politics and Societies 19(3): 379–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arellano, Manuel and Bover, Olympia. 1995. “Another Look at Instrumental Variable Estimation of Error-Component Models.” Journal of Econometrics 68(1): 29–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arnold, R. Douglas. 1990. The Logic of Congressional Action. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Asghar, Zaidi. 2006. “Poverty of Elderly People in EU25.” Policy Brief. Vienna: European Center for Social Welfare Policy and Research.

Aslund, Anders, Boone, Peter, and Johnson, Simon. 1996. “How to Stabilize: Lessons from Post-communist Countries.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1: 217–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bacon, Wally. 2004. “Economic Reform.” In Carey, Henry F., ed., Romania Since 1989: Politics, Economics, and Society. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar

Balcerowicz, Leszek. 1994. “Understanding Postcommunist Transitions.” Journal of Democracy 5(4): 75–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barany, Zoltan and Volgyes, Ivan, eds. 1995. The Legacies of Communism in Eastern Europe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Barany, Zoltan. 2002. “Bulgaria's Royal Elections.” Journal of Democracy 13(2): 141–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barber, Benjamin. 1984. Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Barr, Nicolas. 1998. The Economics of the Welfare State. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Bartels, Larry M. 2008. Unequal Democracy: The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Bates, Robert H. and Krueger, Anne O., eds. 1993. Political and Economic Interactions in Economic Policy Reform: Evidence from Eight Countries. Oxford: Blackwell.

Baxandall, Phineas. 2000. “The Communist Taboo Against Unemployment.” East European Politics and Societies 14(3): 597–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

,BBC. 2006. “Excerpts: Hungarian ‘Lies’ Speech.” Accessed at: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/5359546.stm.

Beetham, David, Bracking, Sarah, Kearton, Iain, and Weir, Stuart. 2002. International IDEA Handbook on Democracy Assessment. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar

Bell, Janice. 1997. “Unemployment Matters: Vote Patterns During the Economic Transition in Poland, 1990–1995.” Europe-Asia Studies 49(7): 1263–1291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benoit, Kenneth and Laver, Michael. 2006. Party Policy in Modern Democracies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Berend, Ivan T. 1996. Central and Eastern Europe, 1944–1993: Detour from the Periphery to the Periphery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berg, Andrew, Borensztein, Eduardo R., Sahay, Ratna, and Zettelmeyer, Jeromin. 1999. “The Evolution of Output in Transition Outcomes: Explaining the Differences.” IMF Working Paper, No. 73.

Berglund, Sten, Hellen, Tomas, and Aarebrot, Frank H., eds. 1998. The Handbook of Political Change in Eastern Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRef

Bermeo, Nancy. 2003. Ordinary People in Extraordinary Times: The Citizenry and the Breakdown of Democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Birch, Sarah. 2003. Electoral Systems and Political Transformation in Postcommunist Europe. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blaydes, Lisa. 2007. Electoral Authoritarianism in Mubarak's Egypt. Ph.D. dissertation. University of California, Los Angeles.

Blejer, Mario I. and Coricelli, Fabrizio, 1995. The Making of Economic Reform in Eastern Europe: Conversations with Leading Reformers in Poland, Hungary, and the Czech Republic. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Blendon, Robert J., Benson, John M., Brodie, Mollyann, Morin, Richard, Altman, Drew E., Gitterman, Daniel, Brossard, Mario, and James, Matt. 1997. “Bridging the Gap Between the Public's and Economists' Views of the Economy.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 11(3): 105–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blinder, Alan S. 1997. “Is Government Too Political?” Foreign Affairs 76(6): 115–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blundell, Richard and Bond, Stephen. 1998. “Initial Conditions and Moment Conditions in Dynamic Panel Data Models.” Journal of Econometrics 87(1): 115–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bodnar, Judit. 2001. Fin de Millenaire Budapest: Metamorphoses of Urban Life. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Boix, Carles. 1998. Political Parties, Growth, and Equality: Conservative and Social Democratic Economic Strategies in the World Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boix, Carles and Stokes, Susan C.. 2003. “Endogenous Democratization.” World Politics 55(4): 517–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bonoli, Giuliano. 2000. The Politics of Pension Reform: Institutions and Policy Change in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bouc, Frantisek. 2006. “Landlords Gain in Rent-Control Fight.” The Prague Post, 28 June.Google Scholar

Bowman, Kirk, Lehoucq, Fabrice, and Mahoney, James. 2005. “Measuring Political Democracy: Case Expertise, Data Adequacy, and Central America.” Comparative Political Studies 38(8): 939–970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bozóki, András and Ishiyama, John T., eds. 2002. The Communist Successor Parties of Central and Eastern Europe. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharp.

Brady, Henry E. and Collier, David, eds. 2004. Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards. Lanham, MD: Rowan and Littlefield.

Brom, Karla and Orenstein, Mitchell. 1994. “The Privatised Sector in the Czech Republic: Government and Bank Control in a Transitional Economy.” Europe-Asia Studies 46(6): 893–928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brooks, Clem and Manza, Jeff. 2007. Why Welfare States Persist: Public Opinion and the Future of Social Provision. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brooks, Joel E. 1987. “The Opinion-Policy Nexus in France – Do Institutions Make a Difference.” Journal of Politics 49(2): 465–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brooks, Joel E. 1990. “The Opinion-Policy Nexus in Germany.” Public Opinion Quarterly 54(4): 508–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brooks, Sarah. 2002. “Social Protection and Economic Integration: The Politics of Pension Reform in an Era of Capital Mobility.” Comparative Political Studies, 35(5): 491–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brooks, Sarah. 2005. “Interdependent and Domestic Foundations of Policy Change: The Diffusion of Pension Privatization Around the World.” International Studies Quarterly 49(2): 273–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Budge, Ian, Klingemann, Hans-Dieter, Volkens, Andrea, Bara, Judith, Tannenbaum, Eric, Fording, Richard, Hearl, Derek, Kim, Hee Min, McDonald, Michael, and Mendes, Silvia. 2001. Mapping Policy Preferences: Parties, Electors and Governments: 1945–1998. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bugajski, Janusz. 2002. Political Parties of Eastern Europe: A Guide to Politics in the Postcommunist Era. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar

Bunce, Valerie. 1995. “Should Transitologists Be Grounded?” Slavic Review 54(1): 111–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bunce, Valerie. 1999. Subversive Institutions: The Design and Destruction of Socialism and the State. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bunce, Valerie. 2001. “Democratization and Economic Reform.” Annual Review of Political Science 4: 43–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bunce, Valerie and Csanádi, Mária. 1993. “Uncertainty in Transition: Postcommunism in Hungary.” East European Politics and Societies 7(2): 240–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Butler, Stuart and Germanis, Peter. 1984. “Achieving Social Security Reform: A Leninist Strategy.” Cato Journal 3: 547–556.Google Scholar

Cain, Michael J. G. And Surdej, Aleksander. 1999. “Transitional Politics or Public Choice? Evaluating Stalled Pension Reforms in Poland.“In Cook, Linda J., Orenstein, Mitchell A., and Rueschemeyer, Marilyn, eds. Left Parties and Social Policy in Postcommunist Europe. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Campos, Nauro F. and Horvath, Roman. 2006. “Reform Redux: Measurement, Determinants, and Reversals.” Center for Economic Policy Research, Working Paper No. 5673.

Canes-Wrone, Brandice. 2006. Who Leads Whom? Presidents, Policy, and the Public. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Canes-Wrone, Brandice and Shotts, Kenneth W.. 2004. “The Conditional Nature of Presidential Responsiveness to Public Opinion.” American Journal of Political Science 48(4): 690–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Caplan, Bryan. 2006. The Myth of the Rational Voter. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Carothers, Thomas. 2004. Critical Mission: Essays on Democracy Promotion. Washington, DC: Carnegie.Endowment for International Peace.Google Scholar

Chan, Kenneth Ka-Lok. 1998. “The Polish General Election of 1997.” Electoral Studies 17(4): 561–567.Google Scholar

Chirot, Daniel, ed. 1989. The Causes of Backwardness in Eastern Europe: Economics and Politics from the Middle Ages until the Early Twentieth Century. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Chlon, Agniezska. 2000. “Pension Reform and Public Information in Poland.” Social Protection Discussion Paper No. 0019. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar

Chlon, Agnieszka, Góra, Marek, and Rutkowski, Michal. 1999. “Shaping Pension Reform in Poland.” Social Protection Discussion Paper No. 9923. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar

Chlon-Dominczak, Agnieszka and Mora, Marek. 2003. “Commitment and Consensus in Pension Reform.” In Holzmann, Robert, Orenstein, Mitchell, and Rutkowski, Michal, eds., Pension Reform in Europe: Process and Progress. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar

Chua, Amy. 2003. World on Fire: How Exporting Free Market Democracy Breeds Ethnic Hatred. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar

Clapham, David and Kintrea, Keith. “Analyzing Housing Privatization.” In Clapham, David, Hegedüs, Joszef, Kintrea, Keith, Tosics, Iván, and Kay, Helen, eds., Housing Privatization in Eastern Europe. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

Clark, Terry D. and Prekevičius, Nerijus. 2003. “Explaining the 2000 Lithuanian Parliamentary Elections: An Application of Contextual and New Institutionalist Approaches.” Slavic Review 62(3): 548–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Commander, Simon and Frye, Timothy. 1999. “The Politics of Postcommunist Economic Reform.” Transition Report 1999. London: EBRD.Google Scholar

Conley, Patricia Heidotting. 2001. Presidential Mandates: How Elections Shape the National Agenda. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Cook, Linda. 1993. The Soviet Social Contract and Why It Failed: Welfare Policies and Workers' Politics from Brezhnev to Yeltsin. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Cook, Linda J., Orenstein, Mitchell A., and Rueschemeyer, Marilyn, eds. 1999. Left Parties and Social Policy in Postcommunist Europe. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

Cook, Linda J. and Orenstein, Mitchell A.. 1999. “The Return of the Left and Its Impact on the Welfare State in Russia, Poland, and Hungary.” In Cook, Linda J., Orenstein, Mitchell A., and Rueschemeyer, Marilyn, eds. Left Parties and Social Policy in Postcommunist Europe. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Cook, Linda J., Orenstein, Mitchell A., and Rueschemeyer, Marilyn. 1999. “Conclusions.” In Cook, Linda J., Orenstein, Mitchell A., and Rueschemeyer, Marilyn, eds. Left Parties and Social Policy in Postcommunist Europe. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Costa, Dora L. 1998. The Evolution of Retirement: An American Economic History, 1880–1990. Chicago: Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crowley, Stephen. 2003. “Explaining Labor Quiescence in Postcommunist Europe: Historical Legacies and Comparative Perspective.” Central and Eastern European Working Paper No. 56. Minda de Gunzberg Center for European Studies, Harvard University.

Crowley, Stephen and Ost, David, eds. 2001. Workers after Workers' States: Labor and Politics in Postcommunist Europe. Lanham, MD: Rowan and Littlefield.

Csontos, László, Kornai, Janos, and Tóth, István György. 1998. “Tax Awareness and Reform of the Welfare State: Hungarian Survey Results.” Economics of Transition 6(2): 287–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cullel, Jorge Vargas. 2004. “Democracy and the Quality of Democracy: Empirical Findings and Methodological and Theoretical Issues Drawn from the Citizen Audit of the Quality of Democracy in Costa Rica.” In O'Donnell, Guillermo, Cullel, Jorge Vargas, and Iazzetta, Osvaldo M., eds., The Quality of Democracy: Theory and Applications. South Bend: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar

Curry, Jane L. 1995. “The Sociological Legacies of Communism.” In Barany, Zoltan and Volgyes, Ivan, eds., The Legacies of Communism in Eastern Europe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Czepulis-Rutkowska, Zofia. 1999. “The Polish Pension System and its Problems.” In Müller, Katharina, Ryll, Andreas, and Wagener, Hans-Jürgen, eds., Transformation of Social Security: Pensions in Central-Eastern Europe. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.Google Scholar

Dahl, Robert. 1971. Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Dahl, Robert. 1989. Democracy and Its Critics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Dahl, Robert. 1990. “The Myth of the Presidential Mandate.” Political Science Quarterly 105: 355–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dahl, Robert. 1998. On Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Dalton, Russell. 2005. Citizen Politics. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar

Danics, Viktoria. 1998. The Hungarian Pension Reform: How Could the Government Do It in 18 Months? M.A. Thesis, Central European University, Budapest.

Deken, Johan Jeroen. 1994. “Social Policy in Postwar Czechoslovakia. The Development of Old-Age Pensions and Housing Policies During the Period 1945–1989.” European University Institute Working Paper SPS No. 94/13.

Delli Carpini, Michael X. and Keeter, Scott. 1996. What Americans Know About Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Melo, Martha, Denizer, Cevdet, and Gelb, Alan. 1996. “Patterns of Transition from Plan to Market.” The World Bank Economic Review 10(3): 397–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Melo, Martha, Denizer, Cevdet, Gelb, Alan, and Tenev, Stoyan. 1997. “Circumstance and Choice: The Role of Initial Conditions and Policies in Transition Economies.” World Bank Working Paper series No. 1866. Washington, DC: World Bank.

DeMelo, Mathias, Denizer, Calvo, and Gelb, Alan. 1996. “From Plan to Market: Patterns of Transition.” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 1564.

Diamond, Douglas B. 1999. The Transition in Housing Finance in Central Europe and Russia, 1989–1999. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.Google Scholar

Diamond, Larry. 2002. “Thinking About Hybrid Regimes.” Journal of Democracy 13: 21–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Diamond, Larry. 2007. The Spirit of Democracy: The Struggle to Build Free Societies Around the World. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar

Diamond, Larry and Morlino, Leonardo, eds. 2005. Assessing the Quality of Democracy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Dimitrov, Vesselin. 2001. Bulgaria: The Uneven Transition. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Djilas, Milovan. 1983. The New Class: An Analysis of the Communist System. San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar

Doling, J. F. 1997. Comparative Housing Policy: Government and Housing in Advanced Industrialized Countries. New York: St. Martin's Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dovi, Suzanne. 2007. The Good Representative. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar

Drazen, Allen and Grilli, Vittorio. 1993. “The Benefits of Crises for Economic Reform.” American Economic Review 83(3): 598–607.Google Scholar

Dreifelds, Juris. 1996. Latvia in Transition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Druckman, James and Roberts, Andrew. 2005. “Context and Coalition Bargaining: Comparing Portfolio Allocation in Eastern and Western Europe.“Party Politics 11(5): 535–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Duch, Raymond. 1995. “Economic Chaos and the Fragility of Democratic Transition in Former Communist Regimes.” Journal of Politics 57(1): 121–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Duch, Raymond. 2001. “A Developmental Model of Heterogeneous Economic Voting in New Democracies.” American Political Science Review 98(4): 895–910.Google Scholar

Duch, Raymond M. and Stevenson, Randolph T.. 2008. The Economic Vote: How Political and Economic Institutions Condition Election Results. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dvořák, Ivan. 1997. “Analýza kapitálového trhu a jeho možných vývojových trendu z hlediska potřeb transformace důchodového pojištěni.” Prague: Czechoslovak Commercial Bank.

Easterly, William. 2006. The White Man's Burden: Why the West's Efforts to Aid the Rest Have Done So Much Ill and So Little Good. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar

,EBRD. 1995–2009. Transition Report. London: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development.Google Scholar

Eddy, Kester. 2006. “Fidesz: Government Economic Policy is ‘Populist.’” Budapest Sun, XIV/7, 16 February.Google Scholar

Eichenberg, Richard and Stoll, Richard. 2003. “Representing Defense: Democratic Control of the Defense Budget in the United States and Western Europe.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 47(4): 399–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ekiert, Grzegorz. 1996. The State Against Society: Political Crises and Their Aftermath in East Central Europe. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ekiert, Grzegorz and Kubik, Jan. 1999. Rebellious Civil Society: Popular Protest and Democratic Consolidation in Poland, 1989–1993. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elster, Jon, Offe, Claus, and Preuss, Ulrich, eds. 1998. Institutional Design in Postcommunist Societies: Rebuilding the Ship at Sea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Erikson, Robert S., MacKuen, Michael, and Stimson, James A.. 2002. The Macro Polity. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Evans, Geoffrey and Whitefield, Stephen. 1995. “The Politics and Economics of Democratic Commitment: Support for Democracy in Transition Societies.” British Journal of Political Science 25(4): 485–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Evans, Martin C. 1999. Change and Choice in Social Protection: The Experience of Central and Eastern Europe. Phare Consensus Programme, European Commission, ADECRI.Google Scholar

Eyal, Gil, Szelenyi, Ivan, and Townsley, Eleanor. 1998. Making Capitalism Without Capitalists: The New Ruling Elites in Eastern Europe. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Falcetti, Elisabetta, Raiser, Martin, and Sanfey, Peter. 2002. “Defying the Odds: Initial Conditions, Reforms, and Growth in the First Decade of Transition.” Journal of Comparative Economics 30(2): 229–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feldstein, Martin. 1997. “The Case for Privatization.” Foreign Affairs 76(4): 24–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ferejohn, John. 1999. “Electoral Accountability and the Control of Politicians: Selecting Good Types Versus Sanctioning Poor Performance.” In Przeworski, Adam, Stokes, Susan C., and Manin, Bernard, eds., Democracy, Accountability and Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ferge, Zsuzsa. 1999. “The Politics of the Hungarian Pension Reform.” In Müller, Katharina, Ryll, Andreas, and Wagener, Hans-Jürgen, eds., Transformation of Social Security: Pensions in Central-Eastern Europe. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.Google Scholar

Fidrmuc, Jan. 2000a. “Political Support for Reforms: Economics of Voting in Transition Countries.” European Economic Review 44(8): 1491–1513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fidrmuc, Jan. 2000b. “Economics of Voting in Postcommunist Countries.” Electoral Studies 19(2/3): 199–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fink-Hafner, Danica. 1997. “Development of a Party System.” In Fink-Hafner, Danica and Robbins, John R., eds., Making a New Nation: The Formation of Slovenia. Aldershot: Dartmouth.

Fischer, Stanley, Sahay, Ratna, and Vegh, Carlos. 1998. “Stabilization and Growth in Transition Economies: The Early Experience.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 10(2): 45–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fish, M. Steven. 1998. “The Determinants of Economic Reform in the Postcommunist World.” East European Politics and Societies 12(1): 31–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fish, M. Steven. 2005. Democracy Derailed in Russia: The Failure of Open Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fishel, Jeff. 1985. Presidents and Promises: From Campaign Pledge to Presidential Performance. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar

Fitzmaurice, John. 1993. “The Estonian Elections of 1992.” Electoral Studies 12(2): 168–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fitzmaurice, John. 1995. “The Slovak Election of September 1994.” Electoral Studies 14(2): 203–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fitzmaurice, John. 1997. “The Slovenian Parliamentary Elections of 10 November 1996.” Electoral Studies 16(3): 403–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fitzmaurice, John. 1999. “The Slovak Elections of 25th and 26th September 1998.” Electoral Studies 18(2): 290–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fitzmaurice, John. 2001. “The Parliamentary Election in Estonia, March 1999.” Electoral Studies 20(1): 141–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Franklin, Mark and Wlezien, Christopher. 1997. “The Responsive Public, Issue Salience, Policy Change, and Preferences for European Unification.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 9(3): 247–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

,Freedom House. 2005. Freedom in the World. New York: Freedom House.Google Scholar

Frye, Timothy. 2002. “The Perils of Polarization: Economic Performance in the Postcommunist World.” World Politics 54(4): 308–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gál, Robert I. 1999. “Hungarian Old-Age Security Prior to the 1998 Reform.” In Müller, Katharina, Ryll, Andreas, and Wagener, Hans-Jürgen, eds., Transformation of Social Security: Pensions in Central-Eastern Europe. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.Google Scholar

Gandhi, Jennifer. 2004. Political Institutions Under Dictatorship. Ph.D. Dissertation. New York University.

Garrett, Geoffrey. 1998. Partisan Politics in the Global Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Garton Ash, Timothy. 1989. The Uses of Adversity: Essays on the Fate of Central Europe. New York: Random House.Google Scholar

Gati, Charles. 1996. “If Not Democracy, What? Leaders, Laggards, and Losers in the Postcommunist World.” In Mandelbaum, Michael, ed., Postcommunism: Four Perspectives. New York: Council on Foreign Relations.Google Scholar

Geddes, Barbara. 1999. “What Do We Know About Democratization After Twenty Years.” Annual Review of Political Science 2: 115–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

George, Alexander L. and Bennett, Andrew. 2005. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Gerring, John. 2004. “What Is a Case Study and What Is It Good For.” American Political Science Review 98(2): 341–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gesell, Rainer, Müller, Katharina, and Süss, Durck. 1999. “Social Security Reform, Privatization, and the Promise of Uwlaszczenie: An Analysis of Competing Proposals.” In Schroeder, Jerzy, ed., From Plan to Market: Selected Problems of the Transition. Poznan: Poznan University of Economics.Google Scholar

Gibson, Edward, Calvo, Ernesto, and Falleti, Tulia. 2004. “Reallocative Federalism.” In Gibson, Edward, ed., Federalism and Democracy in Latin America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Gilens, Martin. 2005. “Inequality and Democratic Responsiveness.” Public Opinion Quarterly 69(5): 778–796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Godoy, Sergio and Stiglitz, Joseph. 2006. “Growth, Initial Conditions, Law and Speed of Privatization in Transition Countries: 11 Years Later.” NBER Working Paper Series No. 11992.

Goertz, Gary. 2006. Social Science Concepts: A User's Guide. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Golinowska, Stanisława. 1999. “Political Actors and Reform Paradigms in Old-Age Security in Poland.” In Müller, Katharina, Ryll, Andreas, and Wagener, Hans-Jürgen, eds., Transformation of Social Security: Pensions in Central-Eastern Europe. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.Google Scholar

Gow, James and Carmichael, Cathie. 2000. Slovenia and the Slovenes: A Small State and the New Europe. London: Hurst and Company.Google Scholar

Graebner, William. 1980. A History of Retirement: The Meaning and Function of an American Institution, 1885–1978. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Greskovits, Bela. 1998. The Political Economy of Protest and Patience: East European and Latin American Transformations Compared. Budapest: Central European University Press.Google Scholar

Gross, Jan. 1990. Revolution from Abroad: The Soviet Conquest of Western Ukraine and Western Byelorussia. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Grzymala-Busse, Anna. 2002. Redeeming the Communist Past: The Regeneration of Communist Parties in East Central Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grzymala-Busse, Anna. 2003. “Political Competition and the Politicization of the State in East Central Europe.” Comparative Political Studies 36(10): 1123–1147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Györi, Peter and Matern, Eva. 1997. “Housing Movements in Budapest.” In Lang-Pickvance, Katy, Manning, Nick, and Pickvance, Chris, eds., Environmental and Housing Movements: Grassroots Experience in Hungary, Russia, and Estonia. Aldershot, UK: Avebury.Google Scholar

Haberlová, Věra and Hartl, Jan. 1998. “Současnost a budoucnost důchodového zabezpečení v České republice.” Prague: Konsorcium VÚPSV a STEM.

Hacker, Jacob S. 2006. The Great Risk Shift: The Assault on American Jobs, Families, Health Care, and Retirement and How You Can Fight Back. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Haerpfer, Christian W. 2002. Democracy and Enlargement in Postcommunist Europe: The Democratisation of the General Public in Fifteen Central and Eastern European Countries, 1991–1998. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Haggard, Stephan, and Kaufman, Robert R.. 1995. The Political Economy of Democratic Transitions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Hall, Peter and Taylor, Rosemary. 1996. “Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms.” Political Studies 44(5): 935–957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hallerberg, Mark, deSouza, Lúcio Vinhas, and Clark, William Roberts. 2002. “Political Business Cycles in EU Accession Countries.” European Union Politics 3(2): 231–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hanson, John Mark. 1991. Gaining Access: Congress and the Farm Lobby, 1919–1981. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Harper, Marcus A.G. 2000. “Economic Voting in Postcommunist Eastern Europe. Comparative Political Studies 33(9): 1191–1227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hausner, Jerzy. 2001. “Security Through Diversity: Conditions for a Successful Reform of the Pension System in Poland.” In Kornai, Janos, Haggard, Stephan, and Kaufman, Robert P., eds., Reforming the State: Fiscal and Welfare Reform in Post-Socialist Countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Havel, Václav. 1999. Projevy a jiné texty z let 1992–1999. Praha: Torst.Google Scholar

Havrylyshyn, Oleh and vonRooden, Ron. 2000. “Initial Conditions Matter in Transition, But So Do Policies.” International Monetary Fund Working Paper 00/07.

Hegedüs, József and Somogyi, Eszter. 2005. “An Evaluation of the Hungarian Mortgage Program, 2000–2004.” In Hegedüs, József and Struyk, Raymond J., eds. Housing Finance: New and Old Models in Central Europe, Russia, and Kazakhstan. Budapest: Open Society Institute.Google Scholar

Hegedüs, József and Tosics, Iván. 1996. “The Disintegration of the East European Housing Model.” In Clapham, David, Hegedüs, Joszef, Kintrea, Keith, Tosics, Ivan, and Kay, Helen, eds., Housing Privatization in Eastern Europe. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar

Hegedüs, József and Tosics, Iván. 1998. “Rent Reform – Issues for the Countries of Eastern Europe and the Newly Independent States.” Housing Studies 13(5): 657–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hegedüs, József and Struyk, Raymond J.. 2005. “Divergences and Convergences in Restructuring Housing Finance in Transition Countries.” In Hegedüs, József and Struyk, Raymond J., eds. Housing Finance: New and Old Models in Central Europe, Russia, and Kazakhstan. Budapest: Open Society Institute.Google Scholar

Hegedüs, József, Mark, Katharine, and Tosics, Iván. 1996. “Uncharted Territory: Hungarian Housing in Transition.” In Struyk, Raymond, ed., Economic Restructuring of the Former Soviet Bloc: The Case of Housing. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.Google Scholar

Hegedüs, József, Mark, Katharine, Struyk, Raymond, and Tosics, Iván. 1993. “Local Options for Transforming the Public Rental Sector: Empirical Results from Two Cities in Hungary.” Cities 10(3): 257–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hegedüs, József, Mayo, Stephen K., and Tosics, Iván. 1996. “Transition of the Housing Sector in the East Central European Countries.” Review of Urban and Regional Development Studies 8: 101–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hejduk, Henryk. 1996. “Poland.” In Balchin, Paul, ed., Housing Policy in Europe. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Hellman, Joel. 1996. “Winners Take All: The Politics of Partial Reform in Postcommunist Transitions.” World Politics 50(2): 203–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hellwig, Timothy and Samuels, David. 2007. “Electoral Accountability and the Variety of Democratic Regimes.” British Journal of Political Science 38(1): 1–26.Google Scholar

Henderson, Karen. 2002. Slovakia: The Escape from Invisibility. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Henn, Matt. 1999. “Polls and the Political Process: The Use of Opinion Polls by Political Parties and Mass Media Organizations in European Post-Communist Societies (1990–1995).” Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 13(3): 127–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heybey, Berta and Murrell, Peter. 1999. “The Relationship between Economic Growth and the Speed of Liberalization during Transition.” Journal of Policy Reform 3: 121–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hill, Kim Quaile and Hurley, Patricia. 1999. “Dyadic Representation Reappraised.” American Journal of Political Science 43(1): 109–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holbrook, Thomas and Garand, James. 1996. “Homo Economus? Economic Information and Economic Voting.” Political Research Quarterly 49(2):351–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holmes, Leslie. 1997. Post-Communism: An Introduction. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Holmes, Stephen. 1996. “Cultural Legacies or State Collapse? Probing the Postcommunist Dilemma.” In Mandelbaum, Michael, ed., Postcommunism: Four Perspectives. New York: Council on Foreign Relations.Google Scholar

Housing Statistics in the European Union 2004. 2005. Karlskrona: Boverket.

Howard, Marc Morjé. 2002. The Weakness of Civil Society in Post-Communist Europe. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Huber, Evelyn. 2003. “The Role of Cross-Regional Comparison.” Comparative Politics Newsletter 13: 1–6.Google Scholar

Huber, Evelyne and Stephens, John D.. 2001. Development and Crisis of the Welfare State: Parties and Policies in Global Markets. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huber, John D. and Powell, G. Bingham. 1994. “Congruence Between Citizens and Policymakers in Two Visions of Liberal Democracy.” World Politics 46(3): 291–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huntington, Samuel P. 1991. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar

Husák, Petr. 1997. Budování kapitalismu v Čechách: Rozhovory s Tomášem Ježkem. Prague: Volvox Globator.Google Scholar

Hutcheson, Derek and Korosteleva, Elena A., eds. 2005. The Quality of Democracy in Post-Communist Europe. London: Routledge.

Iankova, Elena A. 1998. “The Transformative Corporatism of Eastern Europe.” East European Politics and Societies 12(2): 222–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Inglehart, Ronald and Norris, Pippa. 2003. Rising Tide: Gender Equality and Cultural Change around the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Inglot, Tomasz. 1995. “The Politics of Social Policy Reform in Postcommunist Poland: Government Responses to the Social Insurance Crisis during 1989–1993.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 28(3): 361–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Inglot, Tomasz. 2003. “Historical Legacies, Institutions, and the Politics of Social Policy in Hungary and Poland, 1989–1999.” In Ekiert, Grzegorz and Hanson, Stephen, eds., Capitalism and Democracy in Central and Eastern Europe: Assessing the Legacy of Communist Rule. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Inglot, Tomasz. 2008. Welfare States in East Central Europe, 1919–2004. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Innes, Abby. 2002. “Party Competition in Postcommunist Europe: The Great Electoral Lottery.” Comparative Politics 35(1): 85–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jackson, John E., Klich, Jacek, and Poznańska, Krystyna. 2005. The Political Economy of Poland's Transition: New Firms and Reform Governments. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jacobs, Lawrence. 1993. The Health of Nations: Public Opinion and the Making of American and British Health Policy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Jacobs, Lawrence R. and Shapiro, Robert Y.. 1994. “Studying Substantive Democracy: Public Opinion, Institutions, and Policymaking.” PS; Political Science and Politics 27(1): 9–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jacobs, Lawrence R. and Shapiro, Robert Y.. 2000. Politicians Don't Pander: Political Manipulation and the Loss of Democratic Responsiveness. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Janos, Andrew. 1996. “What Was Communism: A Retrospective in Comparative Analysis.” Communist and Postcommunist Studies 29(1): 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jelínek, Tomáš and Schneider, Ondřej. 1999. “An Analysis of the Voluntary Pension Fund System in the Czech Republic.” In Müller, Katharina, Ryll, Andreas, and Wagener, Hans-Jürgen, eds., Transformation of Social Security: Pensions in Central-Eastern Europe. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.Google Scholar

Johnson, Gregg B. and Crisp, Brian F.. 2003. “Mandates, Powers, and Policies.” American Journal of Political Science 47(1): 127–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jowitt, Ken. 1992. New World Disorder: The Leninist Extinction. Berkeley: The University of California Press.Google Scholar

Kalogeropoulou, Efthalia. 1989. “Election Promises and Government Performance in Greece: PASOK's Fulfilment of Its 1981 Election Pledges.” European Journal of Political Research 17(3): 289–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Karklins, Rasma. 2005. The System Made Me Do It: Corruption in Post-Communist Societies. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar

Karl, Terry. 1986. “Imposing Consent? Electoralism versus Democratization in El Salvador.” In Drake, Paul and Silva, Edward, eds. Elections and Democratization in Latin America. San Diego: Center for Iberian and Latin American Studies.Google Scholar

Kay, Stephen. 1999. “Unexpected Privatizations: Politics and Social Security Reforms in the Southern Cone.” Comparative Politics 31(4): 403–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kedar, Orit. 2005. “When Moderate Voters Prefer Extreme Parties: Policy Balancing in Parliamentary Elections.” American Political Science Review 99(2): 185–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kelley, Stanley 1983. Interpreting Elections. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kemeny, Jim. 1981. The Myth of Home-Ownership: Private Versus Public Choices in Housing Tenure. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Kenway, Peter and Klvačová, Eva. 1996. “The Web of Cross-Ownership Among Czech Financial Intermediaries: An Assessment.” Europe-Asia Studies 48(5): 797–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kessel, John H. 1972. “Comment: The Issues in Issue Voting.” American Political Science Review 66(2): 459–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kim, Byung-Yeon and Pirttila, Jukka. 2006. “Political Constraints and Economic Reform: Empirical Evidence from the Postcommunist Transition in the 1990s.” Journal of Comparative Economics 34(3): 446–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

King, Gary and Laver, Michael. 1993. “Party Platforms, Mandates, and Government Spending.” American Political Science Review 87(3): 744–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kingsley, G. Thomas and Mikelsons, Maris. 1996. “The Czech and Slovak Republics: Housing as a ‘Second Stage’ Reform.” In Struyk, Raymond, ed., Economic Restructuring of the Former Soviet Bloc: The Case of Housing. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.Google Scholar

Kitschelt, Herbert. 2000. “Linkages Between Citizens and Politicians in Democratic Polities.” Comparative Political Studies 33(6–7): 845–879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kitschelt, Herbert. 2003. “Accounting for Postcommunist Regime Diversity: What Counts as a Good Cause?” In Ekiert, Grzegorz and Hanson, Stephen, eds., Capitalism and Democracy in Central and Eastern Europe: Assessing the Legacy of Communist Rule. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kitschelt, Herbert, Markowski, Radoslaw, Mansfeldova, Zdenka, and Tóka, Gabor. 1999. Postcommunist Party Systems: Competition, Representation, and Inter-Party Cooperation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klaus, Václav. 1997. Renaissance: The Rebirth of Liberty in the Heart of Europe. Washington, DC: Cato Institute.Google Scholar

Klingemann, Hans-Dieter, Hofferbert, Richard I., and Budge, Ian with Kelman, Hans. 1994. Parties, Policies, and Democracy. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Klingemann, Hans-Dieter, Volkens, Andrea, Bara, Judith, Budge, Ian, and McDonald, Michael. 2006. Mapping Policy Preferences II: Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments in Eastern Europe, European Union, and OECD 1990–2003. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kołodko, Grzegorz W. 1993. “Strategy for Poland.” Working Paper No. 40. Warsaw: Institute of Finance.

Kołodko, Grzegorz W. 2000. From Shock to Therapy: The Political Economy of Postsocialist Transformation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kornai, Janos. 1994. “Transformational Recession: The Main Causes.” Journal of Comparative Economics 19(3): 39–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Körösenyi, András. 1999. Government and Politics in Hungary. Budapest: Central European University Press.Google Scholar

Kostadinova, Petia. No date. “Measuring Economic Reform: An Innovative Approach and New Dataset.” Working Paper, Department of Political Science, University of Florida.

Kostelecky, Tomas. 2002. Political Parties after Communism: Developments in East Central Europe. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.Google Scholar

Kozlowski, Edward. 1996. “Poland.” In Clapham, David, Hegedüs, Joszef, Kintrea, Keith, Tosics, Ivan, and Kay, Helen, eds. Housing Privatization in Eastern Europe. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar

Krastev, Ivan. 2004. Shifting Obsessions: Three Essays on the Politics of Anticorruption. Budapest: Central European University Press.Google Scholar

Krause, Kevin Deegan. 2003. “Slovakia's Second Transition.” Journal of Democracy 14(2): 65–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krause, Kevin Deegan. 2006. Elected Affinities: Democracy and Party Competition in Slovakia and the Czech Republic. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Kreček, Stanislav and Procházková, Saša. 2000. “Deregulace nájemného má smysl, až budou mít lide možnost volby.” ZN Zemské noviny 10/40, 17 February.Google Scholar

Krueger, Gary and Ciolko, Marek. 1998. “A Note on Initial Conditions and Liberalization During the Transition.” Journal of Comparative Economics 26(4): 718–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krugman, Paul. 2001. “2016 and All That.” The New York Times, 22 July.Google Scholar

Krukones, Michael G. 1984. Promises and Performance: Presidential Campaigns as Polity Predictors. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar

Krupavičius, Algis. 1997. “The Lithuanian Parliamentary Elections of 1996.” Electoral Studies 16(4): 541–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kubicek, Paul. 1999. “Organized Labor in Post-Communist States: Will the Western Sun Set on It Too.” Comparative Politics 32(1): 83–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kuran, Timur. 1991. “Now Out of Never: The Element of Surprise in the East European Revolution of 1989.” World Politics 44(1): 7–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laakso, Markku and Taagepera, Rein. 1979. “Effective Number of Parties: A Measure with Application to West Europe.” Comparative Political Studies 12(1): 3–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lane, Thomas. 2001. Lithuania: Stepping Westward. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lasagabaster, Esperanza, Rocha, Roberto, and Wiese, Patrick. 2002. Czech Pension System: Challenges and Reform Options. World Bank Social Protection Discussion Paper No. 0217. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar

Laver, Michael, Benoit, Kenneth, and Garry, John. 2003. “Estimating the Policy Positions of Political Actors Using Words as Data.” American Political Science Review 97(2): 311–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levitsky, Steven and Way, Lucan. 2002. “The Rise of Competitive Authoritarianism.” Journal of Democracy 13: 51–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lewis, Paul G. 2000. Political Parties in Postcommunist Eastern Europe. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Lewis, Paul G., ed. 1996. Party Structure and Organization in East-Central Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Lewis-Beck, Michael S. 1988. Economics and Elections: The Major Western Democracies. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Lewis-Beck, Michael S. and Stegmaier, Mary. 2000. “Economic Determinants of Electoral Outcomes.” Annual Review of Political Science 3: 183–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lijphart, Arend. 1984. Democracies: Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-one Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lijphart, Arend. 1999. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Lin, Ann C. and Loftis, Kenyatha. 2005. “Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Political Science: A Review.” Presented at the American Political Science Association Annual Meeting. Washington, DC, September.

Linde, Jonas. 2004. Doubting Democrats? A Comparative Analysis of Support for Democracy in Central and Eastern Europe. Örebro: Örebro University.Google Scholar

Linz, Juan and Stepan, Alfred. 1996. Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Postcommunist Europe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1959. “Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy.” American Political Science Review 53(1): 69–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1994. “The Social Requisites of Democracy Revisited.” American Sociological Review 59(1): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lipsmeyer, Christine. 2000. “Reading Between the Welfare Lines: Politics and Policy Structure in Postcommunist Europe.” Europe-Asia Studies 52(7): 1191–1211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lipsmeyer, Christine. 2002. “Parties and Policy: Evaluating Economic and Partisan Influences on Welfare Policy Spending during the European Postcommunist Transition.” British Journal of Political Science 32(4): 641–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lipsmeyer, Chrstine. 2003. “Welfare and the Discriminating Public: Explaining Entitlement Attitudes in Postcommunist Europe.” Policy Studies Journal 31(4): 445–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Luna, Juan P. and Zechmeister, Elizabeth J.. 2005. “Political Representation in Latin America: A Survey of Elite-Mass Congruence in Nine Countries.” Comparative Political Studies 38(4): 388–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lupia, Arthur and McCubbins, Matthew D.. 1998. The Democratic Dilemma: Can Citizens Learn What They Need to Know?Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lux, Martin, ed. 2003. Housing Policy: An End or a New Beginning. Budapest: Open Society Institute.

MacDonald, Stuart, Rabinowitz, George, and Listhaug, Ola. 1995. “Political Sophistication and Models of Issue Voting.” British Journal of Political Science 25(4): 453–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Macha, Martin. 1999. “Political Actors and Reform Paradigms in Czech Old-Age Security.” In Müller, Katharina, Ryll, Andreas, and Wagener, Hans-Jürgen, eds., Transformation of Social Security: Pensions in Central-Eastern Europe. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.Google Scholar

MacKuen, Michael B., Erikson, Robert S., and Stimson, James A.. 1992. “Peasants or Bankers? The American Electorate and the U.S. Economy.” American Political Science Review 86(3): 597–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Madison, James, Hamilton, Alexander, and Jay, John. 1987. The Federalist Papers. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar

Madrid, Raúl. 2003. Retiring the State: The Politics of Pension Privatization in Latin America and Beyond. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Mainwaring, Scott. 2003. “Introduction: Democratic Accountability in Latin America.” In Mainwaring, Scott and Welna, Christopher, eds., Democratic Accountability in Latin America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mair, Peter. 1997. Party System Change: Approaches and Interpretations. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Mair, Peter and Mudde, Cas. 1998. “The Party Family and Its Study.” Annual Review of Political Science 1: 211–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Manin, Bernard, Przeworski, Adam, and Stokes, Susan C.. 1999. “Elections and Representation.” In Przeworski, Adam, Stokes, Susan C., and Manin, Bernard, eds., Democracy, Accountability, and Representation. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Mansbridge, Jane. 2003. “Rethinking Representation.” American Political Science Review 97(4): 515–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mansbridge, Jane. 2004. “Representation Revisited: Introduction to the Case against Electoral Accountability.” Democracy and Society 2(1): 12–13.Google Scholar

Manza, Jeff and Cook, Fay Lomax. 2002. “A Democratic Polity? Three Views of Policy Responsiveness to Public Opinion in the United States.” American Politics Research 30(6): 630–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marody, Miroslawa. 1990. “Perceptions of Politics in Polish Society.” Social Research 57(2): 257–274.Google Scholar

Marshall, Monty G. and Jaggers, Keith. 2001. Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions 1800–1999. University of Maryland.Google Scholar

Mayhew, David. 1992. Divided We Govern: Party Control, Lawmaking and Investigations, 1946–1990. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

McAdam, Doug, Tarrow, Sidney, and Tilly, Charles. 2001. Dynamics of Contention. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Merlevede, Bruno. 2003. “Reform Reversals and Output Growth in Transition Economies.” Economics of Transition 11(4): 597–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Merrill, Sally R., Lawrence, Rebecca, Garnett, Harry, Urbanska, Wanda, Kozlowski, Edward, and Laszek, Jacek. 1998. Local Government Rent Policy and Best Practice in Poland: The Need for Rent Reform and an Improved Housing Allowance Program. Washington, D.C.: The Urban Institute.Google Scholar

Michalovic, Peter. 1996. “Czechoslovakia.” In Clapham, David, Hegedüs, József, Kintrea, Keith, and Tosics, Iván, eds., Housing Privatization in Eastern Europe. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar

Milanović, Branko. 1995. “Poverty, Inequality, and Social Policy in Transition Economies.” Policy Research Working Paper 1530. Washington, DC: World Bank.

Millard, Frances. 1999. Polish Politics and Society. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miller, Warren E. and Stokes, Donald E.. 1963. “Constituency Influence in Congress.” American Political Science Review 57(1): 45–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miller, Warren E., Pierce, Roy, Thomassen, Jacques, Herrera, Richard, Homberg, Soren, Esaiasson, Peter, and Wessels, Bernhard. 1999. Policy Representation in Western Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Miller, William L., White, Stephen, and Heywood, Paul. 1998. Values and Political Change in Postcommunist Europe. New York: St. Martin's Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Monroe, Alan D. 1979. “Consistency Between Public Preferences and National Policy Decisions.” American Politics Quarterly 7(1): 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Monroe, Alan D. 1995. “Public Opinion and Public Policy, 1980–1993.” Public Opinion Quarterly 62(1): 6–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moreno, Erika, Crisp, Brian F., and Shugart, Matthew Soberg. 2003. “The Accountability Deficit in Latin America.” In Mainwaring, Scott and Welna, Christopher, eds., Democratic Accountability in Latin America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Moser, Robert G. 1999. “Electoral Systems and the Number of Parties in Postcommunist States.” World Politics 51(3): 359–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mueller, John. 1996. “Democracy, Capitalism, and the End of Transistion.” In Mandelbaum, Michael, ed., Postcommunism: Four Perspectives. New York: Council on Foreign Relations.Google Scholar

Müller, Katharina, Ryll, Andreas, and Wagener, Hans-Jürgen, eds. 1999. Transformation of Social Security: Pensions in Central-Eastern Europe. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.CrossRef

Müller, Katherina. 1999. The Political Economy of Pension Reform in Central-Eastern Europe. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Müller-Rommel, Ferdinand, Fettelschoss, Katja, and Harfst, Philipp. 2004. “Party Government in Central and Eastern European Democracies: A Data Collection (1990–2003).” European Journal of Political Research 43(6): 869–893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Munck, Gerardo L. 2001. “The Regime Question: Theory Building in Democracy Studies.” World Politics 54(1): 119–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Munck, Gerardo L. and Leff, Carol Skalnik. 1997. “Modes of Transition and Democratization: South America and Eastern Europe in Comparative Perspective.” Comparative Politics 29(3): 343–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Munck, Gerardo L. and Verkuilen, Jay. 2002. “Conceptualizing and Measuring Democracy: Evaluating Alternative Indices.” Comparative Political Studies 35(1): 5–34.Google Scholar

Murrell, Peter. 1996. “How Far Has the Transition Progressed?” Journal of Economic Perspectives 10(2): 25–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Muzioł-Węclawowicz, Alina. 1996. “Poland Housing in Transition, 1990–1994.” In Struyk, Raymond, ed., Economic Restructuring of the Former Soviet Bloc: The Case of Housing. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.Google Scholar

Nannestad, Peter and Paldam, Martin. 2002. “The Cost of Ruling: A Foundation of Stone for Two Theories.” In Dorussen, Han and Taylor, Michael, eds., Economic Voting. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Nelson, Joan M. 1993. “The Politics of Economic Transformation: Is Third World Experience Relevant in Eastern Europe.” World Politics 45(3): 433–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nelson, Joan. 2001. “The Politics of Pension and Health Care Reforms in Hungary and Poland.” In Kornai, Janos, Haggard, Stephan, and Kaufman, Robert P., eds., Reforming the State: Fiscal and Welfare Reform in Post-Socialist Countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Nørgaard, Ole. 1996. The Baltic States After Independence. Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Norpoth, Helmut. 1996. “Presidents and the Prospective Voter.” Journal of Politics 58(3): 776–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nussbaum, Martha and Sen, Amartya, eds. 1993. The Quality of Life. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRef

O'Donnell, Guillermo. 1998. “Horizontal Accountability in New Democracies.” Journal of Democracy 9(3): 112–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O'Donnell, Guillermo. 2004. “Human Development, Human Rights, and Democracy.” In O'Donnell, Guillermo, Cullel, Jorge Vargas, and Iazzetta, Osvaldo M., eds., The Quality of Democracy: Theory and Applications. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar

O'Donnell, Guillermo, Cullel, Jorge Vargas, and Iazzetta, Osvaldo M., eds. 2004. The Quality of Democracy: Theory and Applications. South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

O'Dwyer, Conor. 2006. Runaway State-Building: Patronage Politics and Democratic Development. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Offe, Claus. 1991. “Capitalism by Democratic Design? Democratic Theory Facing the Triple Transition in East Central Europe.” Social Research 58(4): 865–892.Google Scholar

Olson, David M. and Crowther, William E., eds. 2002. Committees in Postcommunist Democratic Parliaments: Comparative Institutionalization. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.

Olson, Mancur. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Orenstein, Mitchell. 1998. “Václav Klaus: Revolutionary and Parliamentarian.” East European Constitutional Review 7: 46–55.Google Scholar

Orenstein, Mitchell. 1999. “A Political-Institutional Analysis of Pension Reform in Postcommunist Countries.” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 2310. Washington, DC: World Bank.

Orenstein, Mitchell A. 2001. Out of the Red: Building Capitalism and Democracy in Postcommunist Europe. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Orenstein, Mitchell. 2003. “Mapping the Diffusion of Pension Innovation.” In Holzmann, Robert, Orenstein, Mitchell, and Rutkowski, Michal, eds., Pension Reform in Europe: Process and Progress. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar

Orenstein, Mitchell. 2008. Privatizing Pensions: The Transnational Campaign for Social Security Reform. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Orenstein, Mitchell and Haas, Martine. 2000. “The Global Politics of Attention and Social Policy Transformation in East Central Europe.” Paper presented to the American Association for the Advancement of Slavic Studies Annual Conference, 9–12 November, Denver.

Orenstein, Mitchell and Hale, Lisa E.. 2001. “Corporatist Renaissance.” In Candland, Christopher and Sil, Rudra, eds., The Politics of Labor in a Global Age: Continuity and Change in Late-Developing and Post-Socialist Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Orszag, Peter R. and Stiglitz, Joseph E.. 1999. “Rethinking Pension Reform: Ten Myths About Social Security Systems.” Presented at the New Ideas About Old Age Security, 14–15 September. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar

Ost, David. 2000. “Illusory Corporatism in Eastern Europe: Neoliberal Tripartism and Post-communist Class Identities.” Politics and Society 28(4): 503–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pabriks, Artis and Purs, Aldis. 2001. Latvia: The Challenges of Change. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Pacek, Alexander C. 1994. “Macroeconomic Conditions and Electoral Politics in East Central Europe.” American Journal of Political Science 38(3): 723–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pacek, Alexander C., Pop-Eleches, Grigore, and Tucker, Joshua A.. 2009. “Disenchanted or Discerning: Voter Turnout in Postcommunist Countries.” Journal of Politics 71(2): 473–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Page, Benjamin I. 1978. Choices and Echoes in Presidential Elections: Rational Man and Electoral Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Page, Benjamin I. 2002. “The Semi-Sovereign Public.” In Manza, Jeff, Cook, Fay Lomax, and Page, Benjamin, eds., Navigating Public Opinion: Polls, Policy and the Future of American Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Page, Benjamin I. and Bouton, Marshall M.. 2006. The Foreign Policy Disconnect: What Americans Want from Our Leaders But Don't Get. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Page, Benjamin I. and Shapiro, Robert Y.. 1983. “Effects of Public Opinion on Policy.” American Political Science Review 77(1): 175–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Page, Benjamin I. and Shapiro, Robert Y.. 1992. The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in Americans' Policy Preferences. Chicago: Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Palacios, Robert and Rocha, Roberto. 1998. “The Hungarian Pension System in Transition.” In Bokros, Lajos and Dethier, Jean-Jacques, eds., Public Finance Reform During the Transition: The Experience of Hungary. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar

Paldam, Martin. 1991. “How Robust Is the Vote Function? A Study of Seventeen Nations over Four Decades.” In Norpoth, Helmut, Lewis-Beck, Michael S., and Lafay, Jean-Dominque, eds., Economics and Politics: The Calculus of Support. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Palmer, Edward. 2007. “Pension Reform and the Development of Pension Systems: An Evaluation of World Bank Assistance. Background Paper: Hungary Country Study.” Washington, DC: World Bank.

Persson, Torsten and Tabellini, Guido. 2003. The Economic Effects of Constitutions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Pharr, Susan J. and Putnam, Robert D., eds. 2000. Disaffected Democracies: What's Troubling the Trilateral Countries. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Pickvance, C.G. 1994. “Housing Privatization and Housing Protest in the Transition from State Socialism: A Comparative Study of Budapest and Moscow.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 18: 433–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pierson, Paul. 1994. Dismantling the Welfare State? Reagan, Thatcher, and the Politics of Retrenchment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pierson, Paul, ed. 2001. The New Politics of the Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef

Pierson, Paul. 2004a. “Why Americanists Should Be Buyers in the Marketplace of Ideas.” APSA-CP Newsletter 15: 6–8.Google Scholar

Pierson, Paul. 2004b. Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pierson, Paul and Weaver, R. Kent. 1993. “Imposing Loses in Pension Policy.” In Weaver, R. Kent and Rockman, Bert, eds., Do Institutions Matter? Government Capabilities in the U.S. and Abroad. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar

Pitkin, Hanna Finchel. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

,Plato. 1966. The Republic. Translated by Jowett, Benjamin. New York: Random House.Google Scholar

Polívka, Milan. 1998. “Debate on the Social Laws.” Prague: START Foundation.

Pomper, Gerald M. and Lederman, Susan S.. 1980. Elections in America: Control and Influence in Democratic Politics, 2nd edition. New York: Longman.Google Scholar

Popescu, Marina. 2003. “The Parliamentary and Presidential Elections in Romania, November 2000.” Electoral Studies 22(2): 325–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Powell, G. Bingham. 2000. Elections as Instruments of Democracy: Majoritarian and Proportional Visions. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Powell, G. Bingham. 2004. “Political Representation in Comparative Politics.” Annual Review of Political Science 7: 273–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Powell, G. Bingham. 2005. “The Chain of Responsiveness.” In Diamond, Larry and Morlino, Leonardo, eds., Assessing the Quality of Democracy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Powell, G. Bingham and Whitten, Guy D.. 1993. “A Cross-National Analysis of Economic Voting: Taking Account of Political Context.” American Journal of Political Science 37(2): 391–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Powers, Denise V. and Cox, James H.. 1997. “Echoes from the Past: The Relationship Between Satisfaction with Economic Reforms and Voting Behavior in Poland.” American Political Science Review 91(3): 617–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Poznanski, Kazimierz. 1996. Poland's Protracted Transition: Institutional Change and Economic Growth, 1970–1994. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

,Project on Political Transformation and the Electoral Process in Postcommunist Europe. University of Essex, www.essex.ac.uk/elections.

Przeworski, Adam. 1991. Democracy and the Market: Political and Economic Reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Przeworski, Adam. 1993. “Economic Reforms, Public Opinion, and Political Institutions: Poland in Eastern European Perspective.” In Pereira, Luiz Carlos Bresser, Maravall, José María, and Przeworski, Adam, eds., Economic Reforms in New Democracies: A Social-Democratic Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Przeworski, Adam. 1996. “Public Support for Economic Reforms in Poland.” Comparative Political Studies 29(5): 520–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Przeworski, Adam and Cheibub, Jose Antonio. 1999. “Democracy, Elections, and Accountability for Economic Outcomes.” In Przeworski, Adam, Stokes, Susan C., and Manin, Bernard, eds., Democracy, Accountability, and Representation. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Przeworski, Adam and Limongi, Fernando. 1993. “Political Regimes and Economic Growth.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 7(3): 51–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Przeworski, Adam, Stokes, Susan C., and , Bernard Manin, eds. 1999. Democracy, Accountability, and Representation. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Przeworski, Adam, Alvarez, Michael E., Cheibub, Jose Antonio, and Limongi, Fernando. 2000. Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well-Being in the World, 1950–1990. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Putnam, Robert D. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Putnam, Robert D., with Leonardi, Robert, and Nanetti, Raffaella Y.. 1994. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Rallings, Colin. 1987. “The Influence of Election Programs: Britain and Canada 1945–1976.” In Budge, Ian, Robertson, David, and Hearl, Derek, eds., Ideology, Strategy, and Party Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Remmer, Karen L. 1989. “The Political Impact of Economic Crisis in Latin America in the 1980s.” American Political Science Review 85(3): 777–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Renaud, Bertrand. 1991. “Housing Reform in Socialist Economies.” World Bank Discussion Paper No. 125. Washington, DC: World Bank.

,Radio Free Europe–Radio Liberty. 2001. “Polish President Vetoes Mass Privatization Bill.” Radio Free Europe-Radio Liberty, 11 September.

Riker, William. 1982. Liberalism against Populism: A Confrontation Between the Theory of Democracy and the Theory of Social Choice. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.Google Scholar

Ringold, Dena, Orenstein, Mitchell A., and Wilkens, Erika. 2005. Roma in an Expanding Europe: Breaking the Poverty Cycle. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar

Roberts, Andrew. 2003. “Demythologizing the Czech Opposition Agreement.” Europe-Asia Studies 55(8): 1273–1303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roberts, Andrew. 2004. “The State of Socialism: A Note on Terminology.” Slavic Review 63(2): 349–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roberts, Andrew. 2006. “What Kind of Democracy Is Emerging in Eastern Europe.” Post-Soviet Affairs 22(1): 37–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roberts, Andrew. No date-a. “Pension Privatization in Eastern Europe and Beyond.” Working Paper, Northwestern University.

Roberts, Andrew. No date-b. “Campaign Promises in a New Democracy.” Working Paper, Northwestern University.

Rocha, Roberto, and Vittas, Dimitri. 2002. “The Hungarian Pension Reform: A Preliminary Assessment of the First Years of Implementation.” In Feldstein, Martin and Siebert, Horst, eds., Social Security Pension Reform in Europe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Rodrik, Dani. 1996. “Understanding Economic Policy Reform.” Journal of Economic Literature 34(1): 9–41.Google Scholar

Roper, Steven D. 2000. Romania: The Unfinished Revolution. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers.Google Scholar

Rose, Richard. 1984. Do Parties Make a Difference?Chatham, MA: Chatham House.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rose, Richard and Makkai, Toni. 1995. “Consensus or Dissensus About Welfare in Postcommunist Societies.” European Journal of Political Research 28(2): 203–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rose, Richard and Munro, Neil. 2003. Elections and Parties in New European Democracies. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar

Rose, Richard, Mishler, William, and Haerpfer, Christian. 1998. Democracy and Its Alternatives: Understanding Postcommunist Societies. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Rose-Ackerman, Susan. 2005. From Elections to Democracy: Building Accountable Government in Hungary and Poland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Royed, Terry J. 1996. “Testing the Mandate Model in Britain and the United States: Evidence from the Reagan and Thatcher Eras.” British Journal of Political Science 26(1): 45–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sachs, Jeffrey. 1993. Poland's Jump to the Market Economy. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Sakwa, Richard. 1999. Postcommunism. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar

Sartori, Giovanni. 1970. “Concept Misinformation in Comparative Politics.” American Political Science Review 64(4): 1033–1053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sartori, Giovanni. 1976. Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Saxonberg, Steven. 1999. “Václav Klaus: The Rise and Fall and Re-emergence of a Charismatic Leader.” East European Politics and Societies 13(2): 391–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schaffer, Frederic Charles, ed. 2007. Elections for Sale: The Causes and Consequences of Vote Buying. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.

Schmitter, Philippe C. 2005. “The Ambiguous Virtues of Accountability.” In Diamond, Larry and Morlino, Leonardo, eds., Assessing the Quality of Democracy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Schmitter, Philippe C. and Karl, Terry Lynn. 1991. “What Democracy Is…and Is Not.” Journal of Democracy 2(3): 75–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schmitter, Philippe C. and Karl, Terry Lynn. 1994. “The Conceptual Travels of Transitologists and Consolidolgists: How Far to the East Should They Attempt to Go?” Slavic Review 53(1): 173–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schöpflin, Geroge. 1993. “Culture and Identity in Postcommunist Europe.” In White, Stephen, Batt, Judy, and Lewis, Paul, eds., Developments in Eastern European Politics. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Schrooten, Mechthild, Smeeding, Timothy M., and Wagner, Gert C.. 1999. “Distributional and Fiscal Consequences of Social Security Reforms in Central-Eastern Europe.” In Müller, Katharina, Ryll, Andreas, and Wagener, Hans-Jürgen, eds., Transformation of Social Security: Pensions in Central-Eastern Europe. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.Google Scholar

Schumpeter, Joseph. 1943. Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. New York: Harper.Google Scholar

Seleny, Anna. 1999. “Old Political Rationalities and New Democracies: Compromise and Confrontation in Hungary and Poland.” World Politics 51(4): 484–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Seleny, Anna. 2006. The Political Economy of State-Society Relations in Hungary and Poland: From Communism to the European Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Selowsky, Marcelo and Martin, Ricardo. 1997. “Policy Performance and Output Growth in Transition Economies.” American Economic Review 87(2): 349–353.Google Scholar

Shabad, Goldie and Slomczynski, Kazimierz M.. 1999. “Political Identities in the Initial Phase of Systemic Transformation in Poland.” Comparative Political Studies 32(6): 690–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shapiro, Robert Y. and Young, John T.. 1989. “Public Opinion and the Welfare State: The United States in Comparative Perspective.” Political Science Quarterly 104(1): 59–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simonovits, András. 1999. “The New Hungarian Pension System and Its Problems.” In Müller, Katharina, Ryll, Andreas, and Wagener, Hans-Jürgen, eds., Transformation of Social Security: Pensions in Central-Eastern Europe. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.Google Scholar

Simonovits, András. 2000. “Partial Privatization of a Pension System: Lessons from Hungary.” Journal of International Development 12(4): 519–529.3.0.CO;2-0>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, David J. 2001. Estonia: Independence and European Integration. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Snyder, Jack L. 2000. From Voting to Violence: Democratization and Nationalist Conflict. New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Snyder, Jack and Ballentine, Karen. 1996. “Nationalism and the Marketplace of Ideas.” International Security 21(2): 5–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Soroka, Stuart N. and Wlezien, Christopher. 2004. “Opinion Representation and Policy Feedback: Canada in Comparative Perspective.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 37(3): 531–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Soroka, Stuart N. and Wlezien, Christopher. 2005. “Opinion-Policy Dynamics: Public Preferences and Public Expenditure in the United Kingdom.” British Journal of Political Science 35(4): 665–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Spéder, Zsolt. 2000. “Hungary: Getting Better and Becoming Dissimiliar.” In Stanovnik, Tine, Stropnik, Nada, and Prinz, Christopher, eds., Economic Well-Being of the Elderly: A Comparison Across Five European Countries. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Stanovnik, Tine, Stropnik, Nada, and Prinz, Christopher, eds. 2000. Economic Well-Being of the Elderly: A Comparison Across Five European Countries. Aldershot: Ashgate.

Stark, David and Bruszt, László. 1998. Postsocialist Pathways: Transforming Politics and Property in East Central Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Stiglitz, Joseph E. 2000. “Whither Reform? – Ten Years of the Transition.” Proceedings of the Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics. Washington, DC: World Bank.

Stimson, James A., MacKuen, Michael B., and Erikson, Robert S.. 1995. “Dynamic Representation.” American Political Science Review 89(3): 543–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stokes, Susan. 2001a. Mandates and Democracy: Neoliberalism by Surprise in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stokes, Susan, ed. 2001b. Public Support for Market Reforms in New Democracies. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef

Stone, Randall W. 2002. Lending Credibility: The International Monetary Fund and the Postcommunist Transition. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Struyk, Raymond. 1996. “The Long Road to the Market.” In Struyk, Raymond, ed., Economic Restructuring of the Former Soviet Bloc: The Case of Housing. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.Google Scholar

Struyk, Raymond. 2000. “A Regional Policy Report.” In Struyk, Raymond, ed. Homeownership and Housing Finance Policy in the Former Soviet Bloc: Costly Populism. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.Google Scholar

Surowiecki, James. 2004. The Wisdom of Crowds: Why the Many Are Smarter Than the Few and How Collective Wisdom Shapes Business, Economics, Societies, and Nations. London: Little, Brown.Google Scholar

Sýkora, Luděk. 1998. “Housing System, Housing Policy and House Building in the Czech Republic and Prague.” Accessed at www.natur.cuni.cz/~sykora/text/housing.htm.

Sýkora, Luděk. 2003. “Between the State and Market: Local Government and Housing in the Czech Republic.” In Lux, Martin, ed., Housing Policy: An End or a New Beginning. Budapest: Open Society Institute.Google Scholar

Szczerbiak, Aleks. 2003. “Old and New Divisions in Polish Politics: Polish Parties' Electoral Strategies and Bases of Support.” Europe-Asia Studies 55(5): 729–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Szelenyi, Iván. 1983. Urban Inequalities Under State Socialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Sztompka, Piotr. 1991. “The Intangibles and Imponderables of the Transition to Democracy.” Studies in Comparative Communism 24(3): 295–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sztompka, Piotr. 2000. “Civilisational Incompetence: A Prerequisite of Postcommunist Transition.” Jagellonian University: Center for European Studies.

Szulc, Adam. 2000. “Poland: Transition Gainers with an Uncertain Future.” In Stanovnik, Tine, Stropnik, Nada, and Prinz, Christopher, eds., Economic Well-Being of the Elderly: A Comparison Across Five European Countries. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Taagepera, Rein. 1995. “Estonian Parliamentary Elections, March 1995.” Electoral Studies 14(3): 328–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

,TÁRKI. 1996. “Changes in Attitudes to Pensions and to the Pension System: Report 1/5 for the Ministry of Finance.” Budapest: TÁRKI.

Telgarsky, Jeffrey P., Kingsley, G. Thomas, and Tatian, Peter. 1992. “Housing Allowances and Czechoslovakia's Social Safety Net.” Urban Institute Project Report 6127–96. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.Google Scholar

Thelen, Kathleen. 1999. “Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics.” Annual Review of Political Science 2: 369–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thomson, Robert. 2001. “The Programme to Policy Linkage: The Fulfillment of Election Pledges on Socio-economic Policy in the Netherlands, 1986–1998.” European Journal of Political Research 40(2): 171–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tismaneanu, Vladimir. 1992. Reinventing Politics: Eastern Europe from Stalin to Havel. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Tokes, Rudolf L. 1996. Hungary's Negotiated Revolution: Economic Reform, Social Change, and Political Succession, 1957–1990. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Treisman, Daniel. 2003. “Postcommunist Corruption.” In Fidrmuc, Jan and Campos, Nauro, eds., Political Economy of Transition and Development: Institutions, Politics, and Policies. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar

Tsebelis, George. 2002. Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tucker, Joshua. 2006. Regional Economic Voting: Russia, Poland, Hungary, the Czech Republic, and Slovakia, 1990–1999. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tworzecki, Hubert. 1994. “The Polish Parliamentary Elections of 1993.” Electoral Studies 13(2): 180–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tworzecki, Hubert. 1996. Parties and Politics in Post-1989 Poland. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Tworzecki, Hubert. 2003. Learning to Choose: Electoral Politics in East-Central Europe. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Uchman, Ryszard and Adamski, Jerzy. 2003. “How to Meet the Market Rules and Social Goals for Housing? Local Government and Housing in Poland.” In Lux, Martin, ed., Housing Policy: An End or a New Beginning. Budapest: Open Society Institute.Google Scholar

,United Nations. 1995. Human Development Report. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

,UNU-WIDER. 2007. World Income Inequality Database V 2.0b. Accessed at http://www.wider.unu.edu/wiid/wiid.htm.

,USAID. 1998. Handbook of Democracy and Governance Program Indicators. Washington, DC: USAID.Google Scholar

Vachudova, Milada Anna. 2005. Europe Undivided: Democracy, Leverage, and Integration After Communism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vachudova, Milada Anna, and Snyder, Tim. 1997. “Are Transitions Transitory?: Two Types of Political Change in Eastern Europe Since 1989.” East European Politics and Societies 11(1): 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vanhuysse, Pieter. 2006. Divide and Pacify: Strategic Social Policies and Political Protests in Postcommunist Democracies. Budapest: Central European University Press.Google Scholar

Večerník, Jiří. 2002. The Pension System in the Czech Republic: From Reform to Non-Reform. Prague: Institute of Sociology, Czech Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar

Vittas, Dimitri. 1996. “Private Pension Funds in Hungary: Early Performance and Regulatory Issues.” Policy Research Working Paper No. 1638. Washington, DC: World Bank.

Voinovich, Vladimir. 1977. The Ivankiad: Or, The Tale of the Writer Voinovich's Installation in His New Apartment. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar

,VÚPSV. 2002. “Social Dialogue on Pension Reform in EU Applicant Countries.” Prague: Research Institute of the Ministry of Labor and Social Affairs.

Weaver, R. Kent. 1986. “The Politics of Blame Avoidance.” Journal of Public Policy 6(4): 371–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weaver, R. Kent. 1998. “The Politics of Pensions: Lessons from Abroad.” In Arnold, R. Douglas, Graetz, Michael J., and Munnell, Alicia, eds., Framing the Social Security Debate. Washington, DC: National Academy of Social Insurance.Google Scholar

Weyland, Kurt. 1998. “Swallowing the Bitter Pill: Sources of Popular Support for Neoliberal Reform in Latin America.” Comparative Political Studies 31(5): 539–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Whitefield, Stephen, ed. 1993. The New Institutional Architecture of Eastern Europe. New York: St. Martin's Press.CrossRef

Whitehead, Laurence, ed. 2001. The International Dimensions of Democratization: Europe and the Americas. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef

Whitten, Guy and Palmer, Harvey D.. 1999. “Cross-National Analysis of Economic Voting.” Electoral Studies 18(1): 49–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wilkin, Sam, Haller, Brandon, and Norporth, Helmut. 1997. “From Argentina to Zambia: A World-wide Test of Economic Voting.” Electoral Studies 16(3): 301–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Williamson, John. 1989. “What Washington Means by Policy Reform.” In Williamson, John, ed., Latin American Readjustment: How Much Has Happened?Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar