Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Acronyms
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Questions and Answers
- 3 Classical Bits
- 4 Quantum Bits
- 5 Classical and Quantum Registers
- 6 Classical Register Mechanics
- 7 Quantum Register Dynamics
- 8 Partial Observations
- 9 Mixed States and POVMs
- 10 Double-Slit Experiments
- 11 Modules
- 12 Computerization and Computer Algebra
- 13 Interferometers
- 14 Quantum Eraser Experiments
- 15 Particle Decays
- 16 Nonlocality
- 17 Bell Inequalities
- 18 Change and Persistence
- 19 Temporal Correlations
- 20 The Franson Experiment
- 21 Self-intervening Networks
- 22 Separability and Entanglement
- 23 Causal Sets
- 24 Oscillators
- 25 Dynamical Theory of Observation
- 26 Conclusions
- Appendix
- References
- Index
1 - Introduction
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 November 2017
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Acronyms
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Questions and Answers
- 3 Classical Bits
- 4 Quantum Bits
- 5 Classical and Quantum Registers
- 6 Classical Register Mechanics
- 7 Quantum Register Dynamics
- 8 Partial Observations
- 9 Mixed States and POVMs
- 10 Double-Slit Experiments
- 11 Modules
- 12 Computerization and Computer Algebra
- 13 Interferometers
- 14 Quantum Eraser Experiments
- 15 Particle Decays
- 16 Nonlocality
- 17 Bell Inequalities
- 18 Change and Persistence
- 19 Temporal Correlations
- 20 The Franson Experiment
- 21 Self-intervening Networks
- 22 Separability and Entanglement
- 23 Causal Sets
- 24 Oscillators
- 25 Dynamical Theory of Observation
- 26 Conclusions
- Appendix
- References
- Index
Summary
Motivation
The aim of this book is to introduce, develop, and apply quantized detector networks (QDN), an information-based, observer-centric approach to quantum mechanics (QM). Six reasons motivating our development of QDN are the following.
Avoidance of Metaphysical Speculation
There is such a variety of unproven (and unprovable) speculation concerning the interpretation of QM that the subject of this book, QDN, may appear at first sight to be yet another in this growing branch of metaphysics. In fact, our motivation is precisely the opposite. QDN was intended from the outset to reduce the level of metaphysics in the application of QM. To achieve this, our strategy is to move the traditional focus of attention away from systems under observation (SUOs) and toward the observers of those SUOs. In QDN, wave functions represent not states of SUOs but states of apparatus. We shall call such states labstates, to distinguish them from states of SUOs (which do have a place in QDN). It is only labstates that observers can ever deal with directly.
In this respect, QDN is an attempt at a more laboratory-based description of quantum physics than standard QM, focusing as much on how an experiment is done as on the results of that experiment. For example, instead of talking about the wave function of an electron, QDN talks about the labstate of the signal detectors that allow us to say anything about that electron in the first place. That is all, there is nothing deeper. Whether or not electrons actually “exist” is thereby relegated to an inessential metaphysical issue that we can choose to ignore.
It is important to understand what QDN does not say as much as what it does say. QDN does not say that electrons do not “exist”. QDN merely asks for an empirical definition of “existence”.
QM Is Much More Than a Calculational Device
Many physicists hold the utilitarian view that the success of quantum theory in predicting experimental data is sufficient for their purposes, and that further inquiry is really the business of metaphysics and therefore outside the scope of science proper. We cannot say that this is entirely unreasonable. However, we take the view that QM represents such a radical departure from the principles of classical mechanics (CM) that this pragmatical view cannot be all there is to the subject.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Quantized Detector NetworksThe Theory of Observation, pp. 1 - 12Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017