7 - Semiclassical quantum mechanics
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 October 2009
Summary
In the preceding chapters we have learnt that random matrix theory is perfectly able to explain the universal properties of the spectra of chaotic systems, and this in spite of the oversimplifying assumptions applied. On the one hand it is very satisfactory that one single theory can cope with such a variety of systems as nuclei, mesoscopic structures, or microwave billiards, on the other hand this is a bit disappointing. If there is no possibility of discriminating between the spectra of a nucleus and a quantum dot, then there is little hope of learning anything of relevance about it.
Fortunately, random matrix theory is only one side of the coin. We have already come across some examples demonstrating its limits of validity. Remember the spectral level dynamics where bouncing balls disturbed the otherwise universal Gaussian velocity distribution (see Section 5.2.2). Another example is the scarring phenomenon observed in many wave functions. Here obviously closed classical orbits have left their fingerprints in the amplitude patterns. We cannot expect that the universal random matrix theory can correctly account for individual features such as periodic orbits.
We now come to an alternative approach to analysing the spectra. As we know from the correspondence principle, in the semiclassical limit quantum mechanics eventually turns into classical mechanics. That is why classical dynamics must be hidden somewhere in the spectra, at least in the limit of high quantum numbers. In the introduction we have already discussed this connection for a particle in a one-dimensional box.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Quantum ChaosAn Introduction, pp. 246 - 295Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 1999
- 1
- Cited by