Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wtssw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-15T10:18:50.621Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - The Soviet model for Chinese higher education

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2010

Get access

Summary

For higher education, the main lessons learned from the Soviet Union revolved around thought reform and structural reorganization. According to the official chronology, reorganization was first proposed in mid-1950; the tertiary sector mobilized its forces to resist; thought reform intervened in 1951–1952; and by 1953, the nation's institutions of higher learning had been reconstructed along Soviet lines. As usual, the actual progression of events was rather more complex than the official chronology suggested.

Although political formulas were still phrased in terms of united front class coalitions, Mao's above-cited declaration in mid-1949 about leaning to one side under the aegis of a people's democratic dictatorship anticipated a renewed revolutionary surge. But the speed and intensity of the shift back from united front to revolutionary politics was also closely tied to a hostile international environment, which in turn complicated education reform.

University reorganization was announced at the First National Higher Education Conference in June 1950. Hostilities in Korea began that same month, and in China, domestic tensions escalated with the search for “counterrevolutionaries,” or active opponents of the new regime. Chinese troops came to the aid of their North Korean ally in October, and in December, the U.S. government halted the remission of all funds to China. The Chinese responded, freezing American assets in China. Financial supply lines for American-funded institutions (see Table 8.1) on the Chinese mainland were cut. All foreign-subsidized and foreign-operated cultural, educational, relief, and religious institutions were required to register. All those receiving American subsidies were nationalized or transferred to private Chinese control.

Type
Chapter
Information
Radicalism and Education Reform in 20th-Century China
The Search for an Ideal Development Model
, pp. 164 - 191
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×