Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-pkt8n Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-27T18:14:17.295Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - The informal movement: politics on the margins of the soviet order

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 October 2009

Michael Urban
Affiliation:
University of California, Santa Cruz
Vyacheslav Igrunov
Affiliation:
Institute for Humanities and Political Studies, Moscow
Sergei Mitrokhin
Affiliation:
Institute for Humanities and Political Studies, Moscow
Get access

Summary

The terms ‘informals’ (neformaly) and ‘informal groups’ (neformal'nye gruppy) would refer to those millions of Soviet citizens who took advantage of the relative liberalization introduced by perestroika to band together in associations independent of the party-state's direct sponsorship. By 1989, some 60,000 of these associations were functioning in the country, spanning a wide range of activities and interests: music, sports, literature, history, culture, religion, social service and politics. The origins of the name for this amorphous mass movement have remained unclear. By the mid–1980s, ‘informals’ or ‘informal groups’ had entered the argot of Soviet journalism as a deprecatory descriptor for those people congregating outside of the ‘respectable’ world of the establishment, but a decade earlier it had also been used in Soviet sociology as a euphemism for teenage gangs. However, the source of the name would not be as important for our purposes as would be an understanding of the significance that it came to hold for those to whom it was applied. It was precisely because the informal movement was rooted in one or another form of rebellion against the stifling restrictions of the Soviet order that informals would wear this veiled epithet as a badge of honour. The name became for them a vivid distinction separating their subculture – wherein authenticity, free expression and relevance were paramount – from the official world around them that they had come to regard as dominated by insincerity and pretension, one not only repressive but top-heavy with stupidity.

Unofficial groups – from discussion clubs to insurrectionist organizations – had been to one degree or another a part of the Soviet social landscape throughout the post-war period.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×