Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-pfhbr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-09T04:08:03.044Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - The Challenges to the Monoethnic Regime in Germany, 1955–1982

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2014

Şener Aktürk
Affiliation:
Koç University, Istanbul
Get access

Summary

“Germany is not a country of immigration.”

Commission of the Federation and the States, 1977

“The apparently large number of migrants who are willing to stay in the Federal Republic…must be offered unconditional and permanent integration.”

Kühn Memorandum, 1979

Only six years after the establishment of the postwar Federal Republic of Germany (FRG) in 1949, Germany signed the first treaty for foreign labor recruitment with Italy in 1955. Similar treaties with Greece, Spain, Portugal, Turkey, Yugoslavia, Tunisia, and Morocco followed. Foreign labor recruitment permanently and dramatically altered the ethnic demography and identity politics of the FRG, with its social, cultural, and political consequences still unfolding well into the twenty-first century.

This chapter presents the arrival of foreign workers in Germany, also known as the “guest workers” (gastarbeiter), starting in the mid-1950s, and the social and political challenge they posed to Germany's ethnicity regime, within the theoretical framework presented in the previous chapter. The initial recruitment of foreign workers from the mid-1950s to the late 1960s under the leadership of the Christian Democratic governments and, more importantly, the motivations and reformist tendencies of the Social Democratic Party-Free Democratic Party (SPD-FDP) coalition government that ruled from 1969 to 1982, are examined in detail. The analysis is geared toward explaining the failure to reform the citizenship law during thirteen years of SPD-FDP government, which is the key empirical puzzle in the 1955–82 period.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Teebken, Andrea and Christiansen, Eva Maria, eds., Living Together: The Minorities in the German–Danish Border Regions (Flensburg: European Center for Minority Rights, 2001)Google Scholar
Aust, Stefan and Burgdorff, Stephan, eds., Die Flucht: Über die Vertreibung der Deutschen aus dem Osten (Bonn, Germany: Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung, 2005)Google Scholar
Benhabib, Seyla, “In Search of Europe's Borders,” Dissent (Fall 2002): 33–40
Morgenthau, Henry, Germany Is Our Problem (New York: Harper and Brothers, 1945), 218Google Scholar
Kotsch, Detlef, ed., Minderheitenpolitik in der SBZ/DDR nach dem Zweiten Weltkrieg: Die Sorben, sowjetische Besatzungsherrschaft und die staatliche Sorbenpolitik (Potsdam: Veröffentlichungen des Brandenburgischen Landeshauptarchivs/Verlag für Berlin-Brandenburg, 2000)Google Scholar
Sorbisches Institut, March 27, 2007
Paxton, Robert O., The Anatomy of Fascism (New York: Vintage Books, 2004)Google Scholar
Dancygier, Rafaela M., Immigration and Conflict in Europe (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010), 224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walzer, Michael, Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality (New York: Basic Books, 1983), 56–61Google Scholar
Bade, Klaus, “Ausländer- und Asylpolitik in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland: Grundprobleme und Entwicklungslinien,” in Ursula Mehrländer and Günther Schulze, eds., Einwanderungsland Deutschland: Neue Wege nachhaltiger Integration (Bonn, Germany: Dietz, 2001), 58Google Scholar
Migrationsrat, January 19, 2007
Türkische Gemeinde Deutschland (TGD) [Turkish Community of Germany], February 1, 2007
Deutscher Gewerkschaftsbund (DGB) [German Labor Union], March 22, 2007
Türkische Gemeinde Deutschland, January 26, 2007
Risse, Thomas, “A European Identity? Europeanization and the Evolution of Nation-State Identities,” in Transforming Europe: Europeanization and Domestic Change, ed. Michael Green Cowles, James Caporaso, and Thomas Risse (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2001), 198–215Google Scholar
Migration and Integration (since 2006)
Integration und Asyl in Zahlen, 13th ed. (Nürnberg: BMF, 2004)
Although some conservative politicians would use the non-Christian identity of many immigrants as an explanation for what they portrayed as their lack of integration into German society, there was also an immigrant-friendly Christian movement, and an immigrant-friendly Christian vision existed even within the CDU. Barbara John, a CDU politician who served as the Commissioner of Foreigners of the Berlin Senate for 22 years (1981–2003), is a legendary figure for immigrants in Berlin, who had an overwhelmingly positive perception of her. In response to the question as to how a “Christian” party can embrace Turks and other Muslim immigrants, John asserted that the “Christian conception of man (Menschenbild)” is inclusive of non-Christians, as it is premised on loving the other just as oneself. Interview with Barbara John, March 26, 2007, Berlin
Schmidt, Helmut, Handeln für Deutschland: Wege aus der Krise (Berlin: Rowohlt, 1993)Google Scholar
Hands aufs Herz: Helmut Schmidt im Gesprach mit Sandra Maischberger (Süderbarup: Lühe Verlag, 2002)
“The apparently large number of migrants who are willing to stay in the Federal Republic (comprised particularly of members of the second and third generations) must be offered unconditional and permanent integration.” Heinz Kühn, “The Present and Future Integration of Foreign Workers and Their Families in the Federal Republic of Germany,” published in English translation (Bonn, Germany: Memorandum of the Federal Government Commissioner, 1979), republished in Göktürk et al., Germany in Transit, 247
Kühn, Heinz, Widerstand und Emigration: Die Jahre 1928–1945 (Hamburg: Hoffmann und Campe, 1980)Google Scholar
Garrett, Geoffrey and Weingast, Barry R., “Ideas, Interests, and Institutions: Constructing the European Community's Internal Market,” in Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions, and Political Change, ed. Judith Goldstein and Robert O. Keohane (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1993)Google Scholar
Jahresrückblick in the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung online (accessed December 11, 2007)
Der Baader Meinhof Komplex (2008)
Rückkehrbereitschaft in 1983
Schickler, Eric, Disjointed Pluralism: Institutional Innovation and the Development of the U.S. Congress (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001), 13Google Scholar
Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, January 26, 1999

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×