Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-31T02:40:57.504Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

16 - A hybrid model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 October 2009

Thomas O. McGarity
Affiliation:
University of Texas, Austin
Get access

Summary

The Environmental Protection Agency has adopted an intermediate decisionmaking structure that incorporates many of the advantages of both the team and adversarial models and eliminates many of the disadvantages. EPA's Administrator or the Deputy Administrator designates twenty to thirty rules per year for a special “Options Selection-Rejection process.” These rules are reviewed on a quarterly basis by the Deputy Administrator and other upper-level decisionmakers. The lower-level decisionmaking process for these special rules adheres to the team model, except that at crucial junctures an Options Review meeting of very high-level agency officials and team members is held to choose which regulatory options the agency will actively pursue throughout the remainder of the rulemaking process.

EPA's organizational structure

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is responsible for administering eight important environmental statutes and portions of several other laws. EPA regulations can cut across several industries and can have profound impacts on whole sectors of the economy. It is consequently one of the most prolific producers of regulatory analysis documents. The agency is run by an Administrator, a Deputy Administrator, two Associate Administrators, and nine Assistant Administrators, four of whom bear responsibility for implementing the agency's regulatory programs.

The Office of Policy, Planning and Evaluation

The Office of Policy, Planning and Evaluation (the “policy office”) performs a centralized regulatory analysis review function for the agency and manages the agency decisionmaking process to ensure that agency actions remain on schedule and reflect upper-level policy input. Two of its three suboffices–the Office of Policy Analysis and the Office of Standards and Regulations–play a large role in the day-to-day rulemaking process.

Type
Chapter
Information
Reinventing Rationality
The Role of Regulatory Analysis in the Federal Bureaucracy
, pp. 239 - 262
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • A hybrid model
  • Thomas O. McGarity, University of Texas, Austin
  • Book: Reinventing Rationality
  • Online publication: 16 October 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511528279.017
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • A hybrid model
  • Thomas O. McGarity, University of Texas, Austin
  • Book: Reinventing Rationality
  • Online publication: 16 October 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511528279.017
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • A hybrid model
  • Thomas O. McGarity, University of Texas, Austin
  • Book: Reinventing Rationality
  • Online publication: 16 October 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511528279.017
Available formats
×