Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vsgnj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T01:50:07.950Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Types of implicature

from Part II - Details and developments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2013

Billy Clark
Affiliation:
Middlesex University, London
Get access

Summary

Topics: implications and implicatures; implicated premises and implicated conclusions; deriving implicatures; strength of implicatures

Overview

In the last chapter, we looked in more detail at the relevance-theoretic notion of explicature and the different types of explicature which can be communicated. This chapter looks in more detail at the notion of ‘implicature’. We start, in the next section, by considering the difference between implications and implicatures. Implications are conclusions which follow logically from one or more premises. Implicatures are intentionally communicated implications. This means that, for any utterance, its implicatures constitute a subset of its implications and so the task of interpreting an utterance can be understood either as finding the implications intended by the communicator or as deciding which of a range of implications of an utterance constitute its implicatures. Section 7.3 looks at the difference between implicated premises and implicated conclusions. Implicated premises are inferred so that they can then act as the input to further inferential processes. Implicated conclusions are inferred through the interaction of implicated premises with other assumptions, including explicatures of the utterance. Separating implicated premises and implicated conclusions is not easy, particularly since any conclusion worth having is worth having because it enables us to make further inferences based on it. This section also explores the relationship between contextual assumptions and implicated premises. Complications arise here because contextual assumptions may need to be inferred for the first time in understanding an utterance (in which case they are clearly implicated premises) or they may already be manifest to the hearer (in which case, I will suggest, they are still implicated premises, since the speaker has provided evidence of an intention to make them more manifest by producing the utterance whose interpretation required them). Section 7.4 looks in more detail at the process of deriving implicatures and Section 7.5 considers how implicatures can vary in strength.

Type
Chapter
Information
Relevance Theory , pp. 216 - 239
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Types of implicature
  • Billy Clark, Middlesex University, London
  • Book: Relevance Theory
  • Online publication: 05 June 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139034104.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Types of implicature
  • Billy Clark, Middlesex University, London
  • Book: Relevance Theory
  • Online publication: 05 June 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139034104.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Types of implicature
  • Billy Clark, Middlesex University, London
  • Book: Relevance Theory
  • Online publication: 05 June 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139034104.011
Available formats
×