Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qlrfm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T12:23:11.631Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - RESEARCH PROCESS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Paul S. Gray
Affiliation:
Boston College, Massachusetts
John B. Williamson
Affiliation:
Boston College, Massachusetts
David A. Karp
Affiliation:
Boston College, Massachusetts
John R. Dalphin
Affiliation:
Merrimack College, Massachusetts
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

What Is Social Research?

You are a curious person. That is why you are studying social research. You want to find out about the world, society, and human behavior. Research can be fun, but it is not just spinning out ideas from the comfort of an easy chair. Research is also a dynamic process that is more rigorous and complicated than many people realize. It is part perspiration and part inspiration. Learning the rules and principles of understanding that guide research is part of the challenge, but using our imagination and creativity is also essential for success. This book has been written in that spirit, to provide a foundation from which you can make sense of the world.

This chapter focuses on the promise of social research, the goals of the scientific method, and the differences between science and common sense. The standards by which social researchers evaluate their own work and the work of others are also described.

Data Collection and Analysis

Systematic research in any field of inquiry involves two basic operations. The first is to observe, measure, and record information – in other words, data collection. The second is to arrange and organize these data so that we may discover their significance, generalize about them, or tell what they mean. This exercise is called data analysis. If you write down the weather in your hometown every day for one year, then that would be data collection.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Research Imagination
An Introduction to Qualitative and Quantitative Methods
, pp. 1 - 16
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Gouldner, Alvin. 1962. “Anti-Minotaur: The Myth of a Value-Free Sociology.” Social Problems 9 (Winter): 199–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoover, Kenneth R., and Donovan, Todd. 2000. Elements of Social Scientific Thinking. 7th ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Katzer, Jeffrey, Cook, Kenneth H., and Crouch, Wayne W.. 1997. Evaluating Information: A Guide for Users of Social Science Research. 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
McDonald, Lynn. 1995. The Early Origins of the Social Sciences. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.Google Scholar
Myers-Lipton, Scott. 2006. Social Solutions to Poverty. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.Google Scholar
Adams, Maurianne, Blumenfeld, Warren J., and Castaneda, Carmelita R., eds. 2000. Readings for Diversity and Social Justice: An Anthology on Racism, Sexism, Anti-Semitism, Heterosexism, Classism, and Ableism. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Alexander, Jeffrey C. 2005. The Meanings of Social Life: A Cultural Sociology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Battelle, John. 2005. The Search: How Google and Its Rivals Rewrote the Rules of Business and Transformed Our Culture. New York: Portfolio.Google Scholar
Becker, Howard S. 1971. “Whose Side Are We On?” In Sociological Work, 15–25. Becker, Howard S., ed. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
Berger, Peter. 1963. Invitation to Sociology. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Bureau of Justice Statistics. 2005. Criminal Victimization 2004. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, NCJ 210674.
Caplan, Paula J. 1996. They Say You're Crazy: How the World's Most Powerful Psychiatrists Decide Who's Normal. Reading, MA: Perseus Press.Google Scholar
Carter, Prudence L. 2005. Keepin' It Real: School Success beyond Black and White. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Darwin, Charles. 1859/2003. The Origin of Species. New York: Signet.Google Scholar
Alexis, Tocqueville. 1835/2003. Democracy in America. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Fine, Gary Alan. 1987. With the Boys: Little League Baseball and Preadolescent Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Frankowski, Barbara L., et al. 1994. “Sexual Orientation and Adolescents.” Pediatrics 113:6.Google Scholar
Gambetta, Diego, ed. 2006. Making Sense of Suicide Missions. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gans, Herbert. 1962. The Urban Villagers. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Goodnow, Jacqueline J., and Bowes, Jennifer M.. 2006. Men, Women, and Household Work. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gottschalk, Kurt. 1993. In These Times (May 31): 6–7.
Guba, Egon G., and Lincoln, Yvonna S.. 2005. “Paradigmatic Controversies, Contradictions and Emerging Confluences.” In Handbook of Qualitative Research, 191–216. 3rd ed. Denzin, Norman K. and Lincoln, Yvonna S., eds. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Gubrium, Jaber, and Holstein, James A.. 2006. The New Language of Qualitative Method. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Haack, Susan. 1993. “Science ‘From a Feminist Perspective.’” Philosophy 67:5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammersley, Martyn, and Gomm, Roger. 1997. “Bias in Social Research.” Sociological Research Online 2. http://www.socresonline.org.uk/socresonline/2/1/2.html.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harding, Sandra. 1991. “After the Neutrality Ideal: Science, Politics and ‘Strong Objectivity.’Social Research 59 (3): 568–587.Google Scholar
Hatzfeld, Jean, Sontag, Susan, and Coverdale, Linda. 2006. Machete Season: The Killers in Rwanda Speak. New York: Picador.Google Scholar
Hochschild, Arlie Russell. 2001. The Time Bind: When Work Becomes Home and Home Becomes Work. New York: Owl Books.Google Scholar
Kinsey, Alfred C., Pomeroy, Wardell B., and Martin, Clyde E.. 1948/1998. Sexual Behavior in the Human Male. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Philip. 2006. The Advancement of Science: Science without Legend, Objectivity without Illusions. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lather, Patti. 1993. “Fertile Obsession: Validity after Poststructuralism.” Sociological Quarterly 34 (4): 673–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laumann, Edward O., and Michael, Robert T., eds. 2000. Sex, Love, and Health in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Law, John. 2004. After Method: Mess in Social Science Research. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lewontin, Richard. 1995. “Sex, Lies, and Social Science.” New York Review of Books (April 20): 24– 29.Google Scholar
Lofland, Lyn H. 1998. The Public Realm: Exploring the City's Quintessential Social Territory. Chicago: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Mechling, Jay. 2001. On My Honor: Boy Scouts and the Making of American Youth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nippert-Eng, Christena E. 1996. Home and Work: Negotiating Boundaries through Everyday Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pape, Robert. 2005. Dying to Win: The Strategic Logic of Suicide Terrorism. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Rosenhan, David. L. 1973/2004. “On Being Sane in Insane Places.” In Social Deviance: Readings in Theory and Research, 448–460. Pontell, Henry N., ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Rubin, Lillian B. 2000. Tangled Lives: Daughters, Mothers, and the Crucible of Aging. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Shoemaker, Donald J. 2006. Theories of Delinquency: An Examination of Explanations of Delinquent Behavior. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Turner, Jonathan H., and Stets, Jan E.. 2005. The Sociology of Emotions. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, James D. 1969/1997. The Double Helix: A Personal Account of the Discovery of the Structure of DNA. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar
Zucchino, David. 1999. Myth of the Welfare Queen. New York: Touchstone.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×