Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m8s7h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T17:53:20.392Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - Can woman be free?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2010

Christie McDonald
Affiliation:
Harvard University, Massachusetts
Stanley Hoffmann
Affiliation:
Harvard University, Massachusetts
Get access

Summary

That Rousseau was no friend of women (and even less of feminists) has long been the conclusion of many of his readers; those of Emile in particular. I am not proposing to deny this, but to approach the question of whether woman can be free in a different way, beginning, by way of counterpoint, with a quotation of a different tenor from a lawgiver who appears to differ quite dramatically from Rousseau:

I instituted the order that seemed to me the simplest to observe, and the most likely to be long lasting. In each family, I decreed that the eldest would be considered as its head, unless he was unable to hold that rank for some substantial reason, the determination of which would fall to a high tribunal. The order of birth was similarly to determine all the other ranks. I did not think it proper to exclude women from the rights I granted to men. Nature gives them the same claim as it gives to us; and if the principal foundation of authority over children is the benefit of birth and education, it seems that a mother should have the larger share of it, having such an investment in those two benefits. I therefore ordered by an irrevocable law that power and authority would be according to age, without distinction of sex.

As for participation in the governing communal body, the role of women here is limited in function only during their childbearing and childrearing years, and for this reason only, men may become members of society at forty, but women not until fifty:

I saw no other reason why they should be less capable than us at that age of the tasks of government, I wanted them to have as great a role as the men. […]

Type
Chapter
Information
Rousseau and Freedom , pp. 207 - 215
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×