Tertullian, “Address to the Martyrs,” in Migne, Jacques Paul, ed., Patrologiae cursus completus: Series Latina, vol. 1: Quinti Septimii Florentis Tertulliani Presbyteri Carthaginensis Opera Omnia, part 1, Paris, Excudebat Sirou, 1844, 619–628.Google Scholar

Augustine, “Letter 138,” in Migne, Jacques Paul, ed., Patrologiae cursus completus: Series Latina, vol. 33: Sancti Aurelii Augustini, Hipponensis Episcopi, Opera Omnia, part 2, Paris, Excudebat Sirou, 1865, 525–535.Google Scholar

Augustine, “In Jοannis Evangelium Tractatus CXXIV,” in Migne, Jacques Paul, ed., Patrologiae cursus completus: Series Latina, vol. 35: Sancti Aurelii Augustini, Hipponensis Episcopi, Opera Omnia, part 3, Paris, Excudebat Sirou, 1841, 1379–1976.Google Scholar

Augustine, “The City of God,” in Migne, Jacques Paul, ed., Patrologiae cursus completus: Series Latina, vol. 41: Sancti Aurelii Augustini, Hipponensis Episcopi, Opera Omnia, part 7, Paris, Excudebat Sirou, 1864, 13–804.Google Scholar

Peter Lombard, “Sentences,” in Migne, Jacques Paul, ed., Patrologiae cursus completus: Series Latina, vol. 192: P. Lombardi Magistri Sententiarum, Parisiensis Episcopi Opera Omnia, part 2, Paris, Excudebat Sirou, 1855, 839–962.Google Scholar

Thomas Aquinas, “Summa Theologiae III,” in Sancti Thomae Aquinatis Doctoris Angelici opera omnia iussu impensaque Leonis XIII P. M. edita, vol. 12: Tertia Pars Summae Theologiae a Quaestione LX ad Quaestionem XC ad codices manuscriptos Vaticanos exacta cum Commentariis Thomae de Vio Caietani, Ordinis Praedicatorum, S. R. E. cardinalis, et Supplemento Tertiae partis, Rome, Typographia Polyglotta S. C. de Propaganda Fide, 1906.Google Scholar

United States Supreme Court, “Munn vs. Illinois,” argued 14–18 January 1876, decided 1 March 1877, 94 U.S. 113.Google Scholar

United States Supreme Court, “Jacobellis vs. Ohio,” argued 26 March 1963, restored to the calendar for reargument 29 April 1963, reargued 1 April 1964, decided 22 June 1964, 378 U.S. 184.Google Scholar

Argentine Senate and Chamber of Deputies, “Desaparición forzada de personas,” Ley 24.321, date of assent 11 May 1994, promulgated 8 June 1994, <http://servicios.infoleg.gob.ar/infolegInternet/anexos/0-4999/719/norma.htm>accessed 17 April 2020.accessed+17+April+2020.>Google Scholar

Federal Criminal Court of Cassation, “Orangutana Sandra s/recurso de casación s/habeas corpus,” no. 68831/2014/CFCP, 18 December 2014, <www.nonhumanrights.org/content/uploads/2014/12/Argentina-Habeas-Corpus-Decision.pdf>accessed 17 April 2020.accessed+17+April+2020.>Google Scholar

Mendoza Third Court of Guarantees, “Case Presented by A.F.A.D.A about the Chimpanzee Cecilia – Non Human Individual,” File no. P-72.254/15, 3 November 2016, English translation: <www.nonhumanrights.org/content/uploads/2016/12/Chimpanzee-Cecilia_translation-FINAL-for-website.pdf>accessed 17 April 2020.accessed+17+April+2020.>Google Scholar

New Zealand Government, “Te Awa Tupua/Whanganui River Claims Settlement Act 2017,” Public Act 2017 no. 7, date of assent 20 March 2017, <www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/2017/0007/latest/whole.html>accessed 5 April 2020.accessed+5+April+2020.>Google Scholar

New York State Supreme Court, Appellate Division, “Matter of Nonhuman Rights Project, Inc. vs. Lavery,” decided 8 June 2017, <www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/chimps.pdf>accessed 16 April 2020.accessed+16+April+2020.>Google Scholar

Fourth Lateran Council, “Profession of Faith Firmiter credimus,” 1215, in Mansi, Giovanni Domenico, ed., Sacrorum conciliorum nova et amplissima collectio, vol. 22: Ab anno 1166, ad annum 1225, Paris, Hubert Welter, 1903, 981–982.Google Scholar

Council of Trent, “Decree on the sacraments,” Seventh Session, 3 March 1547, in Mansi, Giovanni Domenico, ed., Sacrorum conciliorum nova et amplissima collectio, vol. 33: Ab anno 1545, ad annum 1565, Paris, Hubert Welter, 1902, 48–60.Google Scholar

Council of Trent, “Decree and canons on the Eucharist,” Thirteenth Session, 11 October 1551, in Mansi, Giovanni Domenico, ed., Sacrorum conciliorum nova et amplissima collectio, vol. 33: Ab anno 1545, ad annum 1565, Paris, Hubert Welter, 1902, 80–85.Google Scholar

Gregory XVI, “Encyclical Mirari vos on Liberalism and Religious Indifferentism,” 15 August 1832, Acta Sanctae Sedis 4 (1868), 336–345.Google Scholar

Pius IX, “Encyclical Quanta cura Condemning Current Errors,” 8 December 1864, Acta Sanctae Sedis 3 (1867), 160–167.Google Scholar

Second Vatican Council, “Constitution Sacrosanctum concilium on the Sacred Liturgy,” 4 December 1963, Acta Apostolicae Sedis 56 (1964), 97–138.Google Scholar

Second Vatican Council, “Dogmatic Constitution Lumen gentium on the Church,” 21 November 1964, Acta Apostolicae Sedis 57 (1965), 5–75.Google Scholar

Second Vatican Council, “Declaration Dignitatis humanae on the Right of the Person and of Communities to Social and Civil Freedom in Matters Religious,” 7 December 1965, Acta Apostolicae Sedis 58 (1966), 929–946.Google Scholar

Second Vatican Council, “Decree Ad gentes on the Mission Activity of the Church,” 7 December 1965, Acta Apostolicae Sedis 58 (1966), 947–990.Google Scholar

Second Vatican Council, “Pastoral Constitution Gaudium et spes on the Church in the Modern World,” 7 December 1965, Acta Apostolicae Sedis 58 (1966), 1025–1120.Google Scholar

Paul VI, “Encyclical Humanae vitae on the Regulation of Birth,” 25 July 1968, Acta Apostolicae Sedis 60 (1968), 481–503.Google Scholar

Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, “Profession of Faith and Oath of Fidelity on Assuming an Office to Be Exercised in the Name of the Church,” 9 January 1989, Acta Apostolicae Sedis 81 (1989), 104–106.Google Scholar

Catechism of the Catholic Church (1992), English translation for the United States of America by the United States Catholic Conference, Vatican City, Libreria Editrice Vaticana, 1994.Google Scholar

John Paul II, “Apostolic Letter Ordinatio sacerdotalis on Reserving Priestly Ordinatio to Men Alone,” 22 May 1994, Acta Apostolicae Sedis 86 (1994), 545–548.Google Scholar

Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, “Decision on the Validity of the Anaphora of Addai and Mari,” 17 January 2001, unpublished.Google Scholar

Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, “Circular Letter to the Presidents of the Episcopal Conferences concerning the Use of Low-Gluten Altar Breads and Mustum as Matter for the Celebration of the Eucharist,” 24 July 2003, Prot. no. 89/78-17498, <www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_20030724_pane-senza-glutine_en.html>accessed 19 March 2020.accessed+19+March+2020.>Google Scholar

Benedict XVI, “Address to the Roman Curia Offering them his Christmas Greetings,” 22 December 2005, <www.vatican.va/content/benedict-xvi/en/speeches/2005/december/documents/hf_ben_xvi_spe_20051222_roman-curia.html>accessed 8 January 2020.accessed+8+January+2020.>Google Scholar

International Theological Commission, “The Hope of Salvation for Infants who Die without Being Baptised,” 20 April 2007, <www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/cti_documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_20070419_un-baptised-infants_en.html>accessed 30 December 2019.accessed+30+December+2019.>Google Scholar

The Roman Missal: The General Instruction of the Roman Missal, Excerpts from the English translation of The Roman Missal (2008), London, Catholic Bishops’ Conference of England and Wales, 2011.Google Scholar

Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, “Responses to questions proposed on the validity of Baptism conferred with the formulas ‘I baptize you in the name of the Creator, and of the Redeemer, and of the Sanctifier’ and ‘I baptize you in the name of the Creator, and of the Liberator, and of the Sustainer’,” 1 February 2008, <www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_20080201_validity-baptism_en.html>accessed 15 November 2018.accessed+15+November+2018.>Google Scholar

The Roman Missal: The Order of Celebrating Matrimony, English Translation According to the Second Typical Edition, for use in the Dioceses of the United States of America, approved by the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops and confirmed by the Apostolic See, Liturgical Press, Collegeville, MN, 2016.Google Scholar

Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments, “Circular Letter to Bishops on the Bread and Wine for the Eucharist,” 15 June 2017, Prot. no. 320/17, <www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/ccdds/documents/rc_con_ccdds_doc_20170615_lettera-su-pane-vino-eucaristia_en.html>accessed 19 March 2020.accessed+19+March+2020.>Google Scholar

Francis, “Apostolic Constitution Veritatis gaudium on Ecclesiastical Universities and Faculties,” 8 December 2017, Acta Apostolicae Sedis 110 (2018), 1–34.Google Scholar

Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, “Responses to questions proposed on the validity of Baptism conferred with the formulas ‘We baptize you in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit’,” 24 June 2020, <http://press.vatican.va/content/salastampa/it/bollettino/pubblico/2020/08/06/0406/00923.html#rispostein>accessed 13 August 2020.accessed+13+August+2020.>Google Scholar

Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, “Doctrinal note on the modification of the sacramental formula of Baptism,” 24 June 2020, <http://press.vatican.va/content/salastampa/it/bollettino/pubblico/2020/08/06/0406/00923.html#rispostein>accessed 13 August 2020.accessed+13+August+2020.>Google Scholar

Tertullian, “Address to the Martyrs,” in Migne, Jacques Paul, ed., Patrologiae cursus completus: Series Latina, vol. 1: Quinti Septimii Florentis Tertulliani Presbyteri Carthaginensis Opera Omnia, part 1, Paris, Excudebat Sirou, 1844, 619–628.Google Scholar

Augustine, “Letter 138,” in Migne, Jacques Paul, ed., Patrologiae cursus completus: Series Latina, vol. 33: Sancti Aurelii Augustini, Hipponensis Episcopi, Opera Omnia, part 2, Paris, Excudebat Sirou, 1865, 525–535.Google Scholar

Augustine, “In Jοannis Evangelium Tractatus CXXIV,” in Migne, Jacques Paul, ed., Patrologiae cursus completus: Series Latina, vol. 35: Sancti Aurelii Augustini, Hipponensis Episcopi, Opera Omnia, part 3, Paris, Excudebat Sirou, 1841, 1379–1976.Google Scholar

Augustine, “The City of God,” in Migne, Jacques Paul, ed., Patrologiae cursus completus: Series Latina, vol. 41: Sancti Aurelii Augustini, Hipponensis Episcopi, Opera Omnia, part 7, Paris, Excudebat Sirou, 1864, 13–804.Google Scholar

Peter Lombard, “Sentences,” in Migne, Jacques Paul, ed., Patrologiae cursus completus: Series Latina, vol. 192: P. Lombardi Magistri Sententiarum, Parisiensis Episcopi Opera Omnia, part 2, Paris, Excudebat Sirou, 1855, 839–962.Google Scholar

Thomas Aquinas, “Summa Theologiae III,” in Sancti Thomae Aquinatis Doctoris Angelici opera omnia iussu impensaque Leonis XIII P. M. edita, vol. 12: Tertia Pars Summae Theologiae a Quaestione LX ad Quaestionem XC ad codices manuscriptos Vaticanos exacta cum Commentariis Thomae de Vio Caietani, Ordinis Praedicatorum, S. R. E. cardinalis, et Supplemento Tertiae partis, Rome, Typographia Polyglotta S. C. de Propaganda Fide, 1906.Google Scholar

United States Supreme Court, “Munn vs. Illinois,” argued 14–18 January 1876, decided 1 March 1877, 94 U.S. 113.Google Scholar

United States Supreme Court, “Jacobellis vs. Ohio,” argued 26 March 1963, restored to the calendar for reargument 29 April 1963, reargued 1 April 1964, decided 22 June 1964, 378 U.S. 184.Google Scholar

Argentine Senate and Chamber of Deputies, “Desaparición forzada de personas,” Ley 24.321, date of assent 11 May 1994, promulgated 8 June 1994, <http://servicios.infoleg.gob.ar/infolegInternet/anexos/0-4999/719/norma.htm>accessed 17 April 2020.accessed+17+April+2020.>Google Scholar

Federal Criminal Court of Cassation, “Orangutana Sandra s/recurso de casación s/habeas corpus,” no. 68831/2014/CFCP, 18 December 2014, <www.nonhumanrights.org/content/uploads/2014/12/Argentina-Habeas-Corpus-Decision.pdf>accessed 17 April 2020.accessed+17+April+2020.>Google Scholar

Mendoza Third Court of Guarantees, “Case Presented by A.F.A.D.A about the Chimpanzee Cecilia – Non Human Individual,” File no. P-72.254/15, 3 November 2016, English translation: <www.nonhumanrights.org/content/uploads/2016/12/Chimpanzee-Cecilia_translation-FINAL-for-website.pdf>accessed 17 April 2020.accessed+17+April+2020.>Google Scholar

New Zealand Government, “Te Awa Tupua/Whanganui River Claims Settlement Act 2017,” Public Act 2017 no. 7, date of assent 20 March 2017, <www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/2017/0007/latest/whole.html>accessed 5 April 2020.accessed+5+April+2020.>Google Scholar

New York State Supreme Court, Appellate Division, “Matter of Nonhuman Rights Project, Inc. vs. Lavery,” decided 8 June 2017, <www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/chimps.pdf>accessed 16 April 2020.accessed+16+April+2020.>Google Scholar

Fourth Lateran Council, “Profession of Faith Firmiter credimus,” 1215, in Mansi, Giovanni Domenico, ed., Sacrorum conciliorum nova et amplissima collectio, vol. 22: Ab anno 1166, ad annum 1225, Paris, Hubert Welter, 1903, 981–982.Google Scholar

Council of Trent, “Decree on the sacraments,” Seventh Session, 3 March 1547, in Mansi, Giovanni Domenico, ed., Sacrorum conciliorum nova et amplissima collectio, vol. 33: Ab anno 1545, ad annum 1565, Paris, Hubert Welter, 1902, 48–60.Google Scholar

Council of Trent, “Decree and canons on the Eucharist,” Thirteenth Session, 11 October 1551, in Mansi, Giovanni Domenico, ed., Sacrorum conciliorum nova et amplissima collectio, vol. 33: Ab anno 1545, ad annum 1565, Paris, Hubert Welter, 1902, 80–85.Google Scholar

Gregory XVI, “Encyclical Mirari vos on Liberalism and Religious Indifferentism,” 15 August 1832, Acta Sanctae Sedis 4 (1868), 336–345.Google Scholar

Pius IX, “Encyclical Quanta cura Condemning Current Errors,” 8 December 1864, Acta Sanctae Sedis 3 (1867), 160–167.Google Scholar

Second Vatican Council, “Constitution Sacrosanctum concilium on the Sacred Liturgy,” 4 December 1963, Acta Apostolicae Sedis 56 (1964), 97–138.Google Scholar

Second Vatican Council, “Dogmatic Constitution Lumen gentium on the Church,” 21 November 1964, Acta Apostolicae Sedis 57 (1965), 5–75.Google Scholar

Second Vatican Council, “Declaration Dignitatis humanae on the Right of the Person and of Communities to Social and Civil Freedom in Matters Religious,” 7 December 1965, Acta Apostolicae Sedis 58 (1966), 929–946.Google Scholar

Second Vatican Council, “Decree Ad gentes on the Mission Activity of the Church,” 7 December 1965, Acta Apostolicae Sedis 58 (1966), 947–990.Google Scholar

Second Vatican Council, “Pastoral Constitution Gaudium et spes on the Church in the Modern World,” 7 December 1965, Acta Apostolicae Sedis 58 (1966), 1025–1120.Google Scholar

Paul VI, “Encyclical Humanae vitae on the Regulation of Birth,” 25 July 1968, Acta Apostolicae Sedis 60 (1968), 481–503.Google Scholar

Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, “Profession of Faith and Oath of Fidelity on Assuming an Office to Be Exercised in the Name of the Church,” 9 January 1989, Acta Apostolicae Sedis 81 (1989), 104–106.Google Scholar

Catechism of the Catholic Church (1992), English translation for the United States of America by the United States Catholic Conference, Vatican City, Libreria Editrice Vaticana, 1994.Google Scholar

John Paul II, “Apostolic Letter Ordinatio sacerdotalis on Reserving Priestly Ordinatio to Men Alone,” 22 May 1994, Acta Apostolicae Sedis 86 (1994), 545–548.Google Scholar

Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, “Decision on the Validity of the Anaphora of Addai and Mari,” 17 January 2001, unpublished.Google Scholar

Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, “Circular Letter to the Presidents of the Episcopal Conferences concerning the Use of Low-Gluten Altar Breads and Mustum as Matter for the Celebration of the Eucharist,” 24 July 2003, Prot. no. 89/78-17498, <www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_20030724_pane-senza-glutine_en.html>accessed 19 March 2020.accessed+19+March+2020.>Google Scholar

Benedict XVI, “Address to the Roman Curia Offering them his Christmas Greetings,” 22 December 2005, <www.vatican.va/content/benedict-xvi/en/speeches/2005/december/documents/hf_ben_xvi_spe_20051222_roman-curia.html>accessed 8 January 2020.accessed+8+January+2020.>Google Scholar

International Theological Commission, “The Hope of Salvation for Infants who Die without Being Baptised,” 20 April 2007, <www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/cti_documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_20070419_un-baptised-infants_en.html>accessed 30 December 2019.accessed+30+December+2019.>Google Scholar

The Roman Missal: The General Instruction of the Roman Missal, Excerpts from the English translation of The Roman Missal (2008), London, Catholic Bishops’ Conference of England and Wales, 2011.Google Scholar

Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, “Responses to questions proposed on the validity of Baptism conferred with the formulas ‘I baptize you in the name of the Creator, and of the Redeemer, and of the Sanctifier’ and ‘I baptize you in the name of the Creator, and of the Liberator, and of the Sustainer’,” 1 February 2008, <www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_20080201_validity-baptism_en.html>accessed 15 November 2018.accessed+15+November+2018.>Google Scholar

The Roman Missal: The Order of Celebrating Matrimony, English Translation According to the Second Typical Edition, for use in the Dioceses of the United States of America, approved by the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops and confirmed by the Apostolic See, Liturgical Press, Collegeville, MN, 2016.Google Scholar

Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments, “Circular Letter to Bishops on the Bread and Wine for the Eucharist,” 15 June 2017, Prot. no. 320/17, <www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/ccdds/documents/rc_con_ccdds_doc_20170615_lettera-su-pane-vino-eucaristia_en.html>accessed 19 March 2020.accessed+19+March+2020.>Google Scholar

Francis, “Apostolic Constitution Veritatis gaudium on Ecclesiastical Universities and Faculties,” 8 December 2017, Acta Apostolicae Sedis 110 (2018), 1–34.Google Scholar

Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, “Responses to questions proposed on the validity of Baptism conferred with the formulas ‘We baptize you in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit’,” 24 June 2020, <http://press.vatican.va/content/salastampa/it/bollettino/pubblico/2020/08/06/0406/00923.html#rispostein>accessed 13 August 2020.accessed+13+August+2020.>Google Scholar

Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, “Doctrinal note on the modification of the sacramental formula of Baptism,” 24 June 2020, <http://press.vatican.va/content/salastampa/it/bollettino/pubblico/2020/08/06/0406/00923.html#rispostein>accessed 13 August 2020.accessed+13+August+2020.>Google Scholar

Abrams, Kathryn and Keren, Hila, “Who’s Afraid of Law and the Emotions?,” Minnesota Law Review 94 (2010), 1997–2074.Google Scholar

Agamben, Giorgio, The Sacrament of Language: An Archaeology of the Oath (Homo sacer II.3), Cambridge, Polity Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Ahern, Emily, see Martin, Emily.Google Scholar

Allen, Jessie, “A Theory of Adjudication: Law as Magic,” Suffolk University Law Review 41 (2008), 773–831.Google Scholar

Allott, Nicholas and Shaer, Benjamin, “The Illocutionary Force of Laws,” Inquiry 61 (2018), 351–369.Google Scholar

Alvarez-Nakagawa, Alexis, “Law as Magic: Some Thoughts on Ghosts, Non-Humans, and Shamans,” German Law Journal 18 (2017), 1247–1275.Google Scholar

Alvarez-Nakagawa, Alexis, “Rituals of (Dis)possession: Appropriation and Performativity in the Early Modern Law of Nations,” London Review of International Law 10 (2022), 33–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Amselek, Paul, “Philosophy of Law and the Theory of Speech Acts,” Ratio Juris 1 (1988), 187–223.Google Scholar

Angenendt, Arnold, “Bonifatius und das sacramentum initiationis: Zugleich ein Beitrag zur Geschichte der Firmung,” in Flammer, Thomas and Meyer, Daniel, eds., Liturgie im Mittelalter: Ausgewählte Aufsätze zum 70. Geburtstag (Ästhetik, Theologie, Liturgik 35), Münster, LIT, 2005, 35–87.Google Scholar

Appleyard, Joseph A., “How Does a Sacrament ‘Cause by Signifying’?,” Science et Esprit 23 (1971), 167–200.Google Scholar

Austin, John L., How to Do Things with Words, The William James Lectures delivered at Harvard University in 1955, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1962.Google Scholar

Austin, John L., “Performative Utterances,” in Austin, John L., Philosophical Papers, edited by James O. Urmson and Geoffrey J. Warnock, 3rd ed., Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1979, 233–252.Google Scholar

Balentine, Samuel E., Have You Considered My Servant Job? Understanding the Biblical Archetype of Patience, Columbia, SC, The University of South Carolina Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Bandes, Susan A. and Blumenthal, Jeremy A., “Emotion and the Law,” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 8 (2012), 161–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bell, Catherine, Ritual Theory, Ritual Practice, Foreword by Diane Jonte-Pace, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Bergesen, Albert, “Die rituelle Ordnung,” in Belliger, Andréa and Krieger, David J., eds., Ritualtheorien: Ein einführendes Handbuch, 5th ed., Wiesbaden, Springer, 2013, 49–75.Google Scholar

Berman, Harold J., Law and Language: Effective Symbols of Community, edited by Witte, John, Jr., Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Berti, Daniela, Good, Anthony and Tarabout, Gilles, eds., Of Doubt and Proof: Ritual and Legal Practices of Judgment (Iuris Diversitas), Farnham, Ashgate Publishing, 2015.Google Scholar

Bertrams, Wilhelm, “Die Bedeutung des 2. Vatikanischen Konzils für das Kirchenrecht,” Österreichisches Archiv für Kirchenrecht 23 (1972), 125–162.Google Scholar

Besson, Éric, La dimension juridique des sacrements (Tesi Gregoriana, Serie Diritto Canonico 65), Rome, Editrice Pontificia Università Gregoriana, 2004.Google Scholar

Boersma, Hans and Levering, Matthew, eds., The Oxford Handbook of Sacramental Theology, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Böhnke, Michael, Kirche in der Glaubenskrise: Eine pneumatologische Skizze zur Ekklesiologie und zugleich eine theologische Grundlegung des Kirchenrechts, Freiburg im Breisgau, Herder, 2013.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre, “Price Formation and the Anticipation of Profits,” in Bourdieu, Pierre, Language and Symbolic Power, edited and introduced by John B. Thompson, translated by Gino Raymond and Matthew Adamson, Cambridge, Polity Press, 1991, 66–89.Google Scholar

Boyer, Pascal, Religion Explained: The Evolutionary Origins of Religious Thought, New York, Basic Books, 2001.Google Scholar

Brinkman, Bruno R., “On Sacramental Man: I Language Patterning,” Heythrop Journal 13 (1972), 371–401.Google Scholar

Brinkman, Bruno R., “‘Sacramental Man’ and Speech Acts Again,” Heythrop Journal 16 (1975), 418–420.Google Scholar

Brion, Denis J., “The Ritual of the Judicial Opinion,” in Lindgren, J. Ralph and Knaak, Jay, eds., Ritual and Semiotics, with an introduction by Roberta Kevelson (Critic of Institutions 14), New York, Peter Lang, 1997, 1–22.Google Scholar

Cappel, Andrew J., “Bringing Cultural Practice into Law: Ritual and Social Norms Jurisprudence,” Santa Clara Law Review 43 (2003), 389–494.Google Scholar

Carlen, Pat, “Remedial Routines for the Maintenance of Control in Magistrates’ Courts,” British Journal of Law and Society 1 (1974), 101–117.Google Scholar

Carmichael, Calum M., “Religious Claims about Biblical Law,” in Huxley, Andrew, ed., Religion, Law and Tradition: Comparative Studies in Religious Law, Abingdon, Routledge, 2002, 20–33.Google Scholar

Charnock, Ross, “Overruling as a Speech Act: Performativity and Normative Discourse,” Journal of Pragmatics 41 (2009), 401–426.Google Scholar

Charrow, Veda R., Crandall, Jo Ann and Charrow, Robert P., “Characteristics and Functions of Legal Language,” in Kittredge, Richard and Lehrberger, John, eds., Sublanguage: Studies of Language in Restricted Semantic Domains, Berlin, Walter de Gruyter, 1982, 175–190.Google Scholar

Chase, Oscar G., Law, Culture, and Ritual: Disputing Systems in Cross-Cultural Context, Foreword by Jerome S. Bruner, New York, NYU Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Chauvet, Louis-Marie, Symbol and Sacrament: A Sacramental Reinterpretation of Christian Existence, translated by Patrick Madigan and Madeleine Beaumont, Collegeville, MN, The Liturgical Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Clark, John H., “Abracadabras in the Law,” The North American Review 229 (1930), 584–591.Google Scholar

Corcos, Christine A., ed., Law and Magic: A Collection of Essays, Durham, NC, Carolina Academic Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Corcos, Christine A., “Magical Images in Law,” in Wagner, Anne and Cheng, Le, eds., Exploring Courtroom Discourse: The Language of Power and Control, Farnham, Ashgate, 2011, 131–175.Google Scholar

Croce, Mariano, Self-sufficiency of Law: A Critical-institutional Theory of Social Order (Law and Philosophy Library 99), Dordrecht, Springer, 2012.Google Scholar

Danet, Brenda, “Language in the Legal Process,” Law & Society Review 14 (1980), 445–564.Google Scholar

Daniel, William L., “Juridic Acts in Book VII of the Codex Iuris Canonici,” Studia Canonica 40 (2006), 433–486.Google Scholar

Dayan, Colin, The Law Is a White Dog: How Legal Rituals Make and Unmake Persons, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

De Sutter, Laurent, “On the Magic of Law,” Law Text Culture 21 (2017), 123–142.Google Scholar

Dinges, William D., “Ritual Conflict as Social Conflict: Liturgical Reform in the Roman Catholic Church,” Sociological Analysis 48 (1987), 138–157.Google Scholar

Doe, Norman, The Legal Framework of the Church of England: A Critical Study in a Comparative Context, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Doherty, Cathal, Maurice Blondel on the Supernatural in Human Action: Sacraments and Superstition (Brill’s Series in Catholic Theology 4), Leiden, Brill, 2017.Google Scholar

Doty, Kathleen L. and Hiltunen, Risto, “Formulaic Discourse and Speech Acts in the Witchcraft Trial Records of Salem, 1692,” Journal of Pragmatics 41 (2009), 458–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Douglas, Mary, Natural Symbols: Explorations in Cosmology, with a new introduction, London, Routledge, 1996.Google Scholar

Duffy, Mervyn, How Language, Ritual and Sacraments Work: According to John Austin, Jürgen Habermas and Louis-Marie Chauvet (Tesi Gregoriana, Serie Teologia 123), Rome, Editrice Pontificia Università Gregoriana, 2005.Google Scholar

Durkheim, Émile, The Elementary Forms of Religious Life [1912], translated and with an introduction by Karen E. Fields, New York, The Free Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Ertz, Stefanie, Schlie, Heike and Weidner, Daniel, “Vorwort,” in Ertz, Stefanie, Schlie, Heike and Weidner, Daniel, Sakramentale Repräsentation: Substanz, Zeichen und Präsenz in der Frühen Neuzeit, mit einem Beitrag von Stefan Manns, Munich, Wilhelm Fink Verlag, 2012, 9–10.Google Scholar

Finnegan, Ruth, “How to Do Things with Words: Performative Utterances among the Limba of Sierra Leone,” Man (New Series) 4 (1969), 537–551.Google Scholar

Flanagan, Kieran, Sociology and Liturgy: Re-presentations of the Holy, New York, St. Martin’s Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Frank, Jerome, Law and the Modern Mind, 6th ed., London, Stevens & Sons, 1949.Google Scholar

Friedmann, Daniel, To Kill and Take Possession: Law, Morality, and Society in Biblical Stories, Peabody, MA, Hendrickson Publishers, 2002.Google Scholar

Gallie, Walter Bryce, “Essentially Contested Concepts,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 56 (1956), 167–198.Google Scholar

Garapon, Antoine, “What Should One Think of Judicial Ritual in Law?,” Summary and Translation by Vivian Grosswald Curran, in Lindgren, J. Ralph and Knaak, Jay, eds., Ritual and Semiotics, with an introduction by Roberta Kevelson (Critic of Institutions 14), New York, Peter Lang, 1997, 23–30.Google Scholar

Gardner, D. S., “Performativity in Ritual: The Mianmin Case,” Man (New Series) 18 (1983), 346–360.Google Scholar

Garrigan, Siobhán, Beyond Ritual: Sacramental Theology After Habermas, Abingdon, Ashgate, 2004.Google Scholar

Geertz, Clifford, “Thick Description: Toward an Interpretive Theory of Culture,” in Geertz, Clifford, The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays, New York, Basic Books, 1973, 3–30.Google Scholar

Geertz, Clifford, “The Impact of the Concept of Culture on the Concept of Man,” in Geertz, Clifford, The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays, New York, Basic Books, 1973, 33–54.Google Scholar

Geertz, Clifford, “Religion as a Cultural System,” in Geertz, Clifford, The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays, New York, Basic Books, 1973, 87–125.Google Scholar

Geertz, Clifford, “‘Internal Conversion’ in Contemporary Bali,” in Geertz, Clifford, The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays, New York, Basic Books, 1973, 170–189.Google Scholar

Geertz, Clifford, Negara: The Theatre State in Nineteenth-Century Bali, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Gerholm, Tomas, “On Ritual: A Postmodernist View,” Ethnos 53 (1988), 190–203.Google Scholar

Geurts, Bart, “Communication as Commitment Sharing: Speech Acts, Implicatures, Common Ground,” Theoretical Linguistics 45 (2019), 1–30.Google Scholar

Girard, René, Violence and the Sacred, translated by Patrick Gregory, London, Continuum, 2005.Google Scholar

Goody, Jack, “Religion and Ritual: The Definitional Problem,” British Journal of Sociology 12 (1961), 142–164.Google Scholar

Goody, Jack, “Against ‘Ritual’: Loosely Structured Thoughts on a Loosely Defined Topic,” in Moore, Sally F. and Myerhoff, Barbara G., eds., Secular Ritual, Assen, Van Gorcum, 1977, 25–35.Google Scholar

Gotti, Maurizio, “Text and Genre,” in Solan, Lawrence M. and Tiersma, Peter M., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Language and Law, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2012, 52–66.Google Scholar

Graupner, Richard, Der Gottesdienst als Ritual: Entdeckung, Kritik und Neukonzeption des Ritualbegriffs in der evangelischen Liturgik (Evangelisch-Katholische Studien zu Gottesdienst und Predigt 5), Göttingen, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht/Echter, 2019.Google Scholar

Greeley, Andrew, The Catholic Imagination, Berkeley, University of California Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Grimes, Ronald L., “Reinventing Ritual,” Soundings: An Interdisciplinary Journal 75 (1992), 21–41.Google Scholar

Grimes, Ronald L., The Craft of Ritual Studies, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Grossi, Renata, “Understanding Law and Emotion,” Emotion Review 7 (2015), 55–60.Google Scholar

Gurvitch, Georges, “Magic and Law,” Social Research 9 (1942), 104–122.Google Scholar

Haering, Stephan, “Liturgie und Recht,” in Klöckener, Martin, Häußling, Angelus A. and Meßner, Reinhard, eds., Theologie des Gottesdienstes: Gottesdienst im Leben der Christen. Christliche und jüdische Liturgie (Gottesdienst der Kirche 2.2), vol. 2, Regensburg, Friedrich Pustet, 2008, 403–454.Google Scholar

Hahn, Judith, “God on Trial: Approaching a Forensic Theology based on Theodicy Reasoning,” in Ego, Beate, Gause, Ute, Margolin, Ron and Rom-Shiloni, Dalit, eds., Theodicy and Protest: Jewish and Christian Perspectives (Studien zu Kirche und Israel, Neue Folge 13), Leipzig, Evangelische Verlagsanstalt, 2018, 249–266.Google Scholar

Hahn, Judith, “Invalid Baptismal Formulas: A Critical View on a Current Catholic Concern,” Ecclesiastical Law Journal 23 (2021), 19–33.Google Scholar

Hahn, Judith, Foundations of a Sociology of Canon Law, Cham, Springer Nature, 2022.Google Scholar

Hahn, Judith, “Magie in Recht und Religion: Über nichtkausale Wirkungszusammenhänge in rechtlichen und religiösen Ritualen,” in Papathanasiou, Konstantina, ed., Zufall: Rechtliche, philosophische und theologische Aspekte (Philosophische Schriften 109), Berlin, Duncker & Humblot, 2022, 146–157.Google Scholar

Halberstam, Chaya, “Encircling the Law: The Legal Boundaries of Rabbinic Judaism,” Jewish Studies Quarterly 16 (2009), 396–424.Google Scholar

Happel, Stephen, “Worship as a Grammar of Social Transformation,” Catholic Theological Society of America Proceedings 42 (1987), 60–87.Google Scholar

Heinemann, Joseph, “Law Court Patterns in Prayer,” in Heinemann, Joseph, Prayer in the Talmud: Forms and Patterns (Studia Judaica 9), Berlin, Walter de Gruyter, 1977, 193–217.Google Scholar

Hibbitts, Bernard J., “Making Motions: The Embodiment of Law in Gesture,” Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues 6 (1995), 51–81.Google Scholar

Hiltunen, Risto, “The Grammar and Structure of Legal Texts,” in Solan, Lawrence M. and Tiersma, Peter M., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Language and Law, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2012, 39–51.Google Scholar

Ho, Hock Lai, “What Does a Verdict Do? A Speech Act Analysis of Giving a Verdict,” International Commentary on Evidence 4 (2006), 1–26.Google Scholar

Hobsbawm, Eric, “Introduction: Inventing Traditions,” in Hobsbawm, Eric and Ranger, Terence, eds., The Invention of Tradition, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1983, 1–14.Google Scholar

Hoffman, Lawrence A., “How Ritual Means: Ritual Circumcision in Rabbinic Culture and Today,” Studia Liturgica 23 (1993), 78–97.Google Scholar

Homans, George C., “Anxiety and Ritual: The Theories of Malinowski and Radcliffe-Brown,” American Anthropologist 43 (1941), 164–172.Google Scholar

Huels, John M., “The Interpretation of Liturgical Law,” Worship 55 (1981), 218–237.Google Scholar

Huels, John M., “Interpreting Canon Law in Diverse Cultures,” The Jurist 47 (1987), 249–293.Google Scholar

Huels, John M., “A Juridical Notion of Sacramentals,” Studia Canonica 38 (2004), 345–368.Google Scholar

Huels, John M., “Review on Besson, La dimension juridique des sacrements,” Studia Canonica 39 (2005), 376–379.Google Scholar

Huels, John M., Liturgy and Law: Liturgical Law in the System of Roman Catholic Canon Law, Montréal, Wilson & Lafleur, 2006.Google Scholar

Huels, John M., “Acts with a Juridic Effect in the Canons of Marriage,” Studia Canonica 49 (2015), 309–331.Google Scholar

Huizing, Peter J., “Reflections on the System of Canon Law,” The Jurist 42 (1982), 239–276.Google Scholar

Humphrey, Caroline and Laidlaw, James, The Archetypal Actions of Ritual: A Theory of Ritual Illustrated by the Jain Rite of Worship (Oxford Studies in Social and Cultural Anthropology), Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Jennings, Theodore W., “On Ritual Knowledge,” The Journal of Religion 62 (1982), 111–127.Google Scholar

Kádár, Dániel and Bax, Marcel M. H., “In-group Ritual and Relational Work,” Journal of Pragmatics 58 (2013), 73–86.Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans, Pure Theory of Law, translated from the 2nd (revised and enlarged) German ed. by Max Knight, Berkeley, University of California Press, 1967.Google Scholar

Kranemann, Benedikt, “Gottesdienst und Moderne: Liturgiewissenschaft im Gespräch mit den ‘Ritual Studies’,” Theologie und Glaube 107 (2017), 247–260.Google Scholar

Kurzon, Dennis, It Is Hereby Performed: Explorations in Legal Speech Acts (Pragmatics & Beyond VII:6), Amsterdam, John Benjamins, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ladrière, Jean, “The Performativity of Liturgical Language,” in Schmidt, Herman and Power, David, eds., Liturgical Experience of Faith (Concilium, Religion in the Seventies), New York, Herder and Herder, 1973, 50–62.Google Scholar

Lawler, Michael G., “Christian Rituals: An Essay in Sacramental Symbolisms,” Horizons 7 (1980), 7–35.Google Scholar

Lawler, Michael G., “Faith and Sacrament in Christian Marriage,” in Lawler, Michael G., Marriage and the Catholic Church: Disputed Questions, Collegeville, MN, The Liturgical Press, 2002, 43–65.Google Scholar

Laytner, Anson, Arguing with God: A Jewish Tradition, Lanham, MD, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 1990.Google Scholar

Leeds-Hurwitz, Wendy, Wedding as Text: Communicating Cultural Identities Through Ritual, Mahwah, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2002.Google Scholar

Lévi-Strauss, Claude, “The Effectiveness of Symbols,” in Lévi-Strauss, Claude, Structural Anthropology, translated from the French by Claire Jacobson and Brooke Grundfest Schoepf, New York, Basic Books, 1963, 186–205.Google Scholar

Lewis, J. Lowell, The Anthropology of Cultural Performance, New York, Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.Google Scholar

Lindgren, J. Ralph, “Semiosis, Ritualization and Magic,” in Lindgren, J. Ralph and Knaak, Jay, eds., Ritual and Semiotics, with an introduction by Roberta Kevelson (Critic of Institutions 14), New York, Peter Lang, 1997, 69–87.Google Scholar

Lüdecke, Norbert, “Feiern nach Kirchenrecht: Kanonistische Bemerkungen zum Verhältnis von Liturgie und Ekklesiologie,” Jahrbuch für Biblische Theologie 18 (2003), 395–456.Google Scholar

Lüdecke, Norbert and Bier, Georg, Das römisch-katholische Kirchenrecht: Eine Einführung, unter Mitarbeit von Bernhard Sven Anuth, Stuttgart, Kohlhammer, 2012.Google Scholar

Lukes, Steven, “Political Ritual and Social Integration,” Sociology 9 (1975), 289–308.Google Scholar

Malinowski, Bronisław K., Coral Gardens and Their Magic, vol. 1: Soil-Tilling and Agricultural Rites in the Trobriand Islands, Introduction by Edmund R. Leach, London, George Allen & Unwin, 1935.Google Scholar

Malinowski, Bronisław K., Coral Gardens and Their Magic: A Study of the Methods of Tilling the Soil and of Agricultural Rites in the Trobriand Islands, vol. 2: The Language of Magic and Gardening, London, George Allen & Unwin, 1935.Google Scholar

Malinowski, Bronisław K., “Magic, Science, and Religion,” in Malinowski, Bronisław K., Magic, Science and Religion and Other Essays, selected, and with an introduction by Robert Redfield, Glencoe, IL, The Free Press, 1948, 1–71.Google Scholar

Marmor, Andrei, Truth in Law (USC Legal Studies Research Paper 11–3), Los Angeles, University of Southern California Law School, 2011.Google Scholar

Martin, Emily, “Rules in Oracles and Games,” Man (New Series) 17 (1982), 302–312.Google Scholar

Martinich, Aloysius P., “Sacraments and Speech Acts,” part 1 and part 2, The Heythrop Journal 16 (1975), 289–303 and 405–417.Google Scholar

Martos, Joseph, Doors to the Sacred: A Historical Introduction to Sacraments in the Catholic Church, Garden City, NY, Doubleday & Company, 1981.Google Scholar

Martos, Joseph, Sacramental Magic, Speech, The College Theology Society Annual Convention, 31 May 1987, <www.academia.edu/36563275/Sacramental_Magic>accessed 18 November 2019.accessed+18+November+2019.>Google Scholar

Martos, Joseph, Sacraments and Magic, Speech, Mount St. Mary’s College, Los Angeles, CA, 23 July 1987, <www.academia.edu/36566418/Sacraments_and_Magic>accessed 18 November 2019.accessed+18+November+2019.>Google Scholar

Martos, Joseph, Catholic Rituals and Magic, Speech, Spalding University, Louisville, KY, 13 June 1995, <www.academia.edu/36566272/Catholic_Rituals_and_Magic>accessed 12 November 2019.accessed+12+November+2019.>Google Scholar

Martos, Joseph, Religion, Ritual and Sacramentality, Landregan Lecture, University of Dallas, 6 November 2004, <www.academia.edu/36566355/Religion_Ritual_and_Sacramentality>accessed 12 November 2019.accessed+12+November+2019.>Google Scholar

Martos, Joseph, “Everyday Sacramentality,” Catechist 39 (2006), 58–62.Google Scholar

Martos, Joseph, Deconstructing Sacramental Theology and Reconstructing Catholic Ritual, Eugene, OR, Resource Publications, 2015.Google Scholar

Martos, Joseph, “Why ‘Receiving the Sacraments’ Is Wrong,” 15 July 2016, <https://dailytheology.org/2016/07/15/why-receiving-the-sacraments-is-wrong>accessed 31 May 2020.accessed+31+May+2020.>Google Scholar

Mauss, Marcel, A General Theory of Magic [1902], translated by Robert Brain, with a foreword by D. F. Pocock, London, Routledge, 2001.Google Scholar

Mauss, Marcel, The Gift: Forms and Functions of Exchange in Archaic Societies [1925], translated by Ian Cunnison, with an introduction by E. E. Evans-Pritchard, London, Cohen & West Ltd, 1966.Google Scholar

Mayblin, Maya, Norget, Kristin and Napolitano, Valentina, “Introduction,” in Mayblin, Maya, Norget, Kristin and Napolitano, Valentina, eds., The Anthropology of Catholicism: A Reader, Oakland, University of California Press, 2017, 1–29.Google Scholar

Michaels, Axel et al., eds., Ritual Dynamics and the Science of Ritual, vol. I: Grammars and Morphologies of Ritual Practices in Asia; vol. II: Body, Performance, Agency and Experience; vol. III: State, Power and Violence; vol. IV: Reflexivity, Media and Visuality; vol. V: Transfer and Spaces, Wiesbaden, Harrassowitz Verlag, 2010–2011.Google Scholar

Moore, Sally F. and Myerhoff, Barbara G., “Introduction: Secular Ritual – Forms and Meanings,” in Moore, Sally F. and Myerhoff, Barbara G., eds., Secular Ritual, Assen, Van Gorcum, 1977, 3–24.Google Scholar

Mörsdorf, Klaus, “Wort und Sakrament als Bauelemente der Kirchenverfassung,” Archiv für katholisches Kirchenrecht 134 (1965), 72–79.Google Scholar

Miller, Geoffrey P., “The Legal Function of Ritual,” Chicago-Kent Law Review 80 (2005), 1181–1233.Google Scholar

Mitchell, Jon P., “A Catholic Body: Miracles, Secularity, and the Porous Self in Malta,” in Norget, Kristin, Napolitano, Valentina and Mayblin, Maya, eds., The Anthropology of Catholicism: A Reader, Oakland, University of California Press, 2017, 211–226.Google Scholar

Myerhoff, Barbara G., “We Don’t Wrap Herring in a Printed Page: Fusion, Fictions and Continuity in Secular Ritual,” in Moore, Sally F. and Myerhoff, Barbara G., eds., Secular Ritual, Assen, Van Gorcum, 1977, 199–224.Google Scholar

Neumann, Thomas, “Recht und Ritual: Eine kanonistische Annäherung an den normativen Charakter der Liturgie,” Liturgisches Jahrbuch 68 (2018), 109–126.Google Scholar

Neuwirth, Rostam J., “Law and Magic: A(nother) Paradox?,” Thomas Jefferson Law Review 37 (2014), 139–190.Google Scholar

Odenthal, Andreas, Liturgie als Ritual: Theologische und psychoanalytische Überlegungen zu einer praktisch-theologischen Theorie des Gottesdienstes als Symbolgeschehen (Praktische Theologie heute 60), Stuttgart, Kohlhammer, 2002.Google Scholar

Odenthal, Andreas, Rituelle Erfahrung: Praktisch-theologische Konturen des christlichen Gottesdienstes (Praktische Theologie heute 161), Stuttgart, Kohlhammer, 2019.Google Scholar

Olivecrona, Karl, Law As Fact, Copenhagen, Einar Munksgaard/Oxford University Press, 1939.Google Scholar

Olivecrona, Karl, Law As Fact, 2nd ed., London, Stevens & Sons, 1971.Google Scholar

Olivecrona, Karl, “Legal Language and Reality,” in Newman, Ralph A., ed., Essays in Jurisprudence in Honor of Roscoe Pound, Indianapolis, IN, Bobbs-Merrill, 1962, 151–191.Google Scholar

Olson, Greta, From Law and Literature to Legality and Affect, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2022.Google Scholar

Peters, Edward M., The Magician, the Witch, and the Law (The Middle Ages), Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Press, 1978.Google Scholar

Peters, Edward N., “The Ordination of Men Bereft of Speech and the Celebration of Sacraments in Sign Language,” Studia Canonica 42 (2008), 331–345.Google Scholar

Pickstock, Catherine, “Ritual: An Introduction,” International Journal of Philosophy and Theology 79 (2018), 217–221.Google Scholar

Platvoet, Jan G., “Ritual in Plural and Pluralist Societies: Instruments for Analysis,” in Platvoet, Jan G. and van der Toorn, Karel, eds., Pluralism and Identity: Studies in Ritual Behaviour, Leiden, Brill, 1995, 25–51.Google Scholar

Posner, Eric A., “Law and the Emotions,” The Georgetown Law Journal 89 (2001), 1977–2012.Google Scholar

Pree, Helmuth, “On Juridic Acts and Liability in Canon Law: Part One,” The Jurist 58 (1998), 41–83.Google Scholar

Prodi, Paolo, Der Eid in der europäischen Verfassungsgeschichte (Schriften des Historischen Kollegs, Vorträge 33), Munich, Stiftung Historisches Kolleg, 1992.Google Scholar

Prodi, Paolo, ed., Glaube und Eid: Treueformeln, Glaubensbekenntnisse und Sozialdisziplinierung zwischen Mittelalter und Neuzeit (Schriften des Historischen Kollegs, Kolloquien 28), unter Mitarbeit von Elisabeth Müller-Luckner, Munich, R. Oldenbourg Verlag, 1993.Google Scholar

Prodi, Paolo, Das Sakrament der Herrschaft: Der politische Eid in der Verfassungsgeschichte des Okzidents (Schriften des Italienisch-Deutschen Historischen Instituts in Trient 11), aus dem Italienischen von Judith Elze, Berlin, Duncker & Humblot, 1997.Google Scholar

Pyle, Ransford C., “Law, Ritual and Language,” American Legal Studies Association Forum 8 (1984), 381–392.Google Scholar

Quitterer, Josef, “Liturgie als geteilte intentionale Praxis,” in Stuflesser, Martin, Geldhof, Joris and Theuer, Andy, eds., “Ein Symbol dessen, was wir sind”: Liturgische Perspektiven zur Frage der Sakramentalität (Theologie der Liturgie 13), Regensburg, Friedrich Pustet, 2018, 68–82.Google Scholar

Rahner, Karl, “The Theology of the Symbol,” in Rahner, Karl, Theological Investigations, vol. IV: More Recent Writings, translated by Kevin Smyth, London, Darton, Longman & Todd/The Seabury Press, 1974, 221–252.Google Scholar

Rahner, Karl, “The Word and the Eucharist,” in Rahner, Karl, Theological Investigations, vol. IV: More Recent Writings, translated by Kevin Smyth, London, Darton, Longman & Todd/The Seabury Press, 1974, 253–286.Google Scholar

Rahner, Karl, “The Presence of Christ in the Sacrament of the Lord’s Supper,” in Rahner, Karl, Theological Investigations, vol. IV: More Recent Writings, translated by Kevin Smyth, London, Darton, Longman & Todd/The Seabury Press, 1974, 287–311.Google Scholar

Rahner, Karl, “On the Duration of the Presence of Christ After Communion,” in Rahner, Karl, Theological Investigations, vol. IV: More Recent Writings, translated by Kevin Smyth, London, Darton, Longman & Todd/The Seabury Press, 1974, 312–320.Google Scholar

Rahner, Karl, “A Theology of the Church That Seeks to Serve: Interview with Meinold Krauss for South-German Radio (SDR), Stuttgart, 14 April 1979,” in Imhof, Paul and Biallowons, Hubert, eds., Karl Rahner in Dialogue: Conversations and Interviews 1965–1982, Translation edited by Harvey D. Egan, New York, The Crossroad Publishing Company, 1986, 204–210.Google Scholar

Rappaport, Roy A., Ecology, Meaning, and Religion, Richmond, CA, North Atlantic Books, 1979.Google Scholar

Rappaport, Roy A., Ritual and Religion in the Making of Humanity (Cambridge Studies in Social and Cultural Anthropology 110), Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Sallinen, Riitta, “Observations on Contractual Speech Acts,” in Kuure, Leena, Kärkkäinen, Elise and Saarenkunnas, Maarit, eds., Kieli ja sosiaalinen toiminta – Language and Social Action (AFinLAn vuosikirja 2005, Suomen soveltavan kielitieteen yhdistyksen julkaisuja 63), Jyväskylä, Suomen soveltavan kielitieteen yhdistys Jyväskylä, AFinLA, 2005, 289–308.Google Scholar

Schane, Sanford, “Contract Formation as a Speech Act,” undated online document <http://grammar.ucsd.edu/courses/lign105/student-court-cases/Schane%20-%20Contracts.pdf>accessed 20 January 2019.accessed+20+January+2019.>Google Scholar

Schillebeeckx, Edward, “Hin zu einer Wiederentdeckung der christlichen Sakramente: Ritualisierung religiöser Momente im alltäglichen Leben,” in Holderegger, Adrian and Wils, Jean-Pierre, eds., Interdisziplinäre Ethik: Grundlagen, Methoden, Bereiche – Festgabe für Dietmar Mieth zum sechzigsten Geburtstag (Studien zur theologischen Ethik 69), Freiburg im Üechtland, Universitätsverlag, Herder, 2001, 309–339.Google Scholar

Schlie, Heike, “Vollzug durch das Bild: Vertrag und Eid als Sakrament,” in Ertz, Stefanie, Schlie, Heike and Weidner, Daniel, eds., Sakramentale Repräsentation: Substanz, Zeichen und Präsenz in der Frühen Neuzeit, mit einem Beitrag von Stefan Manns, Munich, Wilhelm Fink Verlag, 2012, 117–143.Google Scholar

Schmitt, Carl, Roman Catholicism and Political Form, translated and annotated by G. L. Ulmen (Contributions in Political Sciences 380), Westport, CT, Greenwood Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Schreiter, Robert J., Constructing Local Theologies, Foreword by Edward Schillebeeckx, Maryknoll, NY, Orbis Books, 1985.Google Scholar

Searle, John R., Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1970.Google Scholar

Searle, John R., “A Classification of Illocutionary Acts,” Language in Society 5 (1976), 1–23.Google Scholar

Searle, John R., “How Performatives Work,” Linguistics and Philosophy 12 (1989), 535–558.Google Scholar

Searle, John R., Making the Social World: The Structure of Human Civilization, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Searle, Mark, “The Uses of Liturgical Language,” Liturgy 4 (1985), 15–19.Google Scholar

Seasoltz, R. Kevin, New Liturgy, New Laws, Collegeville, MN, The Liturgical Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Seasoltz, R. Kevin, “Liturgy and Ecclesiastical Law: Some Canonical and Pastoral Challenges,” The Jurist 70 (2010), 114–130.Google Scholar

Senn, Frank C., Embodied Liturgy: Lessons in Christian Ritual, Minneapolis, MN, Augsburg Fortress Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Sherry, Patrick, “The Sacramentality of Things,” New Blackfriars 89 (2008), 575–590.Google Scholar

Smith, James M. and McClendon, James W., Jr., “Religious Language after J. L. Austin,” Religious Studies 8 (1972), 55–63.Google Scholar

Stacey, Robin Chapman, Dark Speech: The Performance of Law in Early Ireland (The Middle Ages Series), Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Stone, Suzanne L., “Rabbinic Legal Magic: A New Look at Honi’s Circle As the Construction of Law’s Space,” Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities 17 (2005), 97–123.Google Scholar

Stuflesser, Martin, “‘… damit wir einst als unverhüllte Wirklichkeit empfangen, was wir jetzt in heiligen Zeichen begehen’: Anmerkungen zur Theologie der Sakramente und der Sakramentalität im ökumenischen Kontext,” in Stuflesser, Martin, Geldhof, Joris and Theuer, Andy, eds., “Ein Symbol dessen, was wir sind”: Liturgische Perspektiven zur Frage der Sakramentalität (Theologie der Liturgie 13), Regensburg, Friedrich Pustet, 2018, 25–49.Google Scholar

Stuflesser, Martin and Weyler, Tobias, eds., Liturgische Normen: Begründungen, Anfragen, Perspektiven (Theologie der Liturgie 14), Regensburg, Friedrich Pustet, 2018.Google Scholar

Stuflesser, Martin, Ziebertz, Hans-Georg, Weyler, Tobias and Döhnert, Susanne, “Liturgische Normen und gottesdienstliche Praxis: Ein empirisch-theologisches Forschungsprojekt zum Handeln liturgischer Akteure,” in Stuflesser, Martin and Weyler, Tobias, eds., Liturgische Normen: Begründungen, Anfragen, Perspektiven (Theologie der Liturgie 14), Regensburg, Friedrich Pustet, 2018, 11–35.Google Scholar

Tambiah, Stanley J., “The Magical Power of Words,” Man (New Series) 3 (1968), 175–208.Google Scholar

Tambiah, Stanley J., “A Performative Approach to Ritual,” Proceedings of the British Academy 65 (1979), 113–169.Google Scholar

Taylor, Charles, The Language Animal: The Full Shape of the Human Linguistic Capacity, Cambridge, MA, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Tiersma, Peter M., “Rites of Passage: Legal Ritual in Roman Law and Anthropological Analogues,” The Journal of Legal History 9 (1988), 3–25.Google Scholar

Tiersma, Peter M., Legal Language, Chicago, IL, The University of Chicago Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Tinker, Melvin, “Language, Symbols and Sacraments: Was Calvin’s View of the Lord’s Supper Right?,” Churchman 112 (1998), 131–149.Google Scholar

Trosborg, Anna, “Statutes and Contracts: An Analysis of Legal Speech Acts in the English Language of the Law,” Journal of Pragmatics 23 (1995), 31–53.Google Scholar

Turner, Terence S., “Transformation, Hierarchy and Transcendence: A Reformulation of van Gennep’s Model of the Structure of Rites De Passage,” in Moore, Sally F. and Myerhoff, Barbara G., eds., Secular Ritual, Assen, Van Gorcum, 1977, 53–70.Google Scholar

Turner, Victor W., “Ritual, Tribal and Catholic,” Worship 50 (1976), 504–526.Google Scholar

Usher, Anton, Replenishing Ritual: Rediscovering the Place of Rituals in Western Christian Liturgy (Marquette Studies in Theology 72), Milwaukee, WI, Marquette University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Van Gennep, Arnold, The Rites of Passage: A Classic Study of Cultural Celebrations, Chicago, IL, The University of Chicago Press, 1960.Google Scholar

Vanhoozer, Kevin J., Is There a Meaning in This Text? The Bible, the Reader, and the Morality of Literary Knowledge, Grand Rapids, MI, Zondervan, 1998.Google Scholar

Vermeys, Nicolas W., “Ritual, Symbolism and … Cyberjustice?: A reflection on how ritualistic practices seem to hinder the integration of technology into the legal process,” Presentation, AIJA Law & Technology Conference, 25–27 June 2008, Sydney, <https://aija.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Vermeys1.pdf>accessed 14 September 2019.accessed+14+September+2019.>Google Scholar

Vidor, Gian Marco, “Rhetorical Engineering of Emotions in the Courtroom: The Case of Lawyers in Modern France,” Rechtsgeschichte – Legal History 25 (2017), 286–295.Google Scholar

Vismann, Cornelia, Medien der Rechtsprechung, edited by Kemmerer, Alexandra and Krajewski, Markus, Frankfurt am Main, S. Fischer Verlag, 2011.Google Scholar

Ware, James H., Jr., “Legislating Religious Rituals: How Communion Is Regulated in Some Protestant Denominations,” in Lindgren, J. Ralph and Knaak, Jay, eds., Ritual and Semiotics, with an introduction by Roberta Kevelson (Critic of Institutions 14), New York, Peter Lang, 1997, 171–192.Google Scholar

Weidner, Daniel, “Sakramentale Repräsentation als Modell und Figur,” in Ertz, Stefanie, Schlie, Heike and Weidner, Daniel, eds., Sakramentale Repräsentation: Substanz, Zeichen und Präsenz in der Frühen Neuzeit, mit einem Beitrag von Stefan Manns, Munich, Wilhelm Fink Verlag, 2012, 13–28.Google Scholar

Wendebourg, Dorothea, Essen zum Gedächtnis: Der Gedächtnisbefehl in den Abendmahlstheologien der Reformation (Beiträge zur historischen Theologie 148), Tübingen, Mohr Siebeck, 2009.Google Scholar

Wheelock, Wade T., “The Problem of Ritual Language: From Information to Situation,” The Journal of the American Academy of Religion 50 (1982), 49–71.Google Scholar

Whitman, James Q., The Origins of Reasonable Doubt: Theological Roots of the Criminal Trial, New Haven, CT, Yale University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Winn, Peter A., “Legal Ritual,” Law and Critique 2 (1991), 207–232.Google Scholar

Witte, John, Jr. and Manzer, Christopher J., “Introduction,” in Berman, Harold J., in Witte, John, ed., Law and Language: Effective Symbols of Community, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2013, 1–35.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, Ludwig, Philosophical Investigations, translated by G. E. M. Anscombe, New York, The Macmillan Company, 1963 .Google Scholar