Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-l82ql Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-04T10:17:02.288Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Challenges to charismatic authority in the Unificationist Movement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2009

James R. Lewis
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin, Stevens Point
Sarah M. Lewis
Affiliation:
University of Wales, Lampeter
Get access

Summary

One important issue in understanding the emergence and development of new religious movements (NRMs) is the durability and survivability of movement leadership. There is little question that during NRMs' first generation the charismatic authority of the founder/leader is the primary source of movement legitimation and cohesiveness. At the same time, NRM founders also oversee the movement's organizational development. While types of leadership may be divided into the traditional, charismatic, and rational legal ideal types that Weber (1964) has constructed, actual movement leadership is likely to combine these types. In order to understand both the strengths and vulnerabilities of NRM leadership, therefore, both charismatic and organizational leadership must be considered. Further, as movements develop they become more complex entities. NRMs initially tend to form around a charismatic leader based on that individual's revelatory or mystical experience. At this juncture movements mirror the traditional sociological conception of a cult, a loosely organized group with a charismatic leader. As movements develop, they are likely to consist of three major components: the inner circle, which is composed of the founder/leader and a small number of confidants; a set of administrative, economic, and mission-oriented organizations, which increasingly assume a rational-legal, bureaucratic form; and a grassroots membership base, which during the first generation consists exclusively of movement converts (Bromley and Bobbitt 2006; Zald and Berger 1978). In this chapter we argue that each of these three movement segments constitutes a power base, and challenges to charismatic authority may emanate from one or more of these sources.

Type
Chapter
Information
Sacred Schisms
How Religions Divide
, pp. 129 - 146
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barker, Eileen. 1983. “Doing Love: Tensions in the Ideal Family.” In James, Gene(ed.), The Family and the Unification Church (pp. 35–52). New York: Rose of Sharon Press.Google Scholar
Barker, Eileen.. 1988. “Defection from the Unification Church: Some Statistics and Distinctions.” In Bromley, David G. (ed.), Falling from the Faith: Causes and Consequences of Religious Apostasy (pp. 166–84). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Barker, Eileen. 1995. “The Unification Church.” In Miller, Timothy (ed.), America's Alternative Religions (pp. 223–30). Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Beverly, James. 2005. “Spirit Revelation and the Unification Church.” In Lewis, James R. and Petersen, Jesper Aagaard (eds.), Controversial New Religions(pp. 43–60). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bromley, David G. 1985. “The Economic Structure of the Unificationist Movement.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 24: 253–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bromley, David G. 1988. “Economic Structure and Charismatic Leadership in the Unification Church.” In Richardson, James T. (ed.), Money and Power in the New Religions (pp. 335–64). Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press.Google Scholar
Bromley, David G. Forthcoming. “Making Sense of Scientology: Prophetic Contractual Religion.” In Lewis, James R. (ed.), Scientology. New York: Oxford University Press.
Bromley, David G. and Bobbitt, Rachel. 2006. “Challenges to Charismatic Leadership.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Religion, Washington, DC, November.
Bromley, David G. and Shupe, Anson. 1979a. “Atrocity Tales, the Unification Church, and the Social Construction of Evil.” Journal of Communication 29: 42–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bromley, David G. and Shupe, Anson. 1979b. “Moonies” in America: Cult, Church, and Crusade. Beverley Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Bromley, David G. and Shupe, Anson.1983. “The Archetypal Cult: Conflict and the Social Construction of Deviance.” In James, Gene, ed., The Family and the Unification Church(pp. 1–22). New York: Rose of Sharon Press.Google Scholar
Dawson, Lorne. 2002. “Crises of Charismatic Legitimacy and Violent Behavior in New Religious Movements.” In Bromley, David G. and Melton, J. Gordon (eds.), Cults, Religion and Violence (pp. 80–101). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Durham, Deanna. 1981. Life among the Moonies: Three Years in the Unification Church. Plainfield, NJ: Logos International.Google Scholar
Durst, Mose. 1982. “Life in the Northern California Church.” In Quebedeaux, Richard, ed., Lifestyle: Conversations with Members of the Unification Church (pp. 141–62). New York: Rose of Sharon Press.Google Scholar
Edwards, Christopher. 1979. Crazy for God. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Elkins, Chris. 1980. Heavenly Deception. Wheaton, IL: Tyndale House.Google Scholar
Enroth, Ronald. 1977. Youth, Brainwashing and the Extremist Cults. Kentwood, MI: Zondervan.Google Scholar
Galanter, Marc. 1989. Cults: Faith, Healing, and Coercion. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goodstein, Laurie. 1997. “35,000 Couples Are Invited to a Blessing by Rev. Moon.”New York Times, November 28.Google Scholar
Heftmann, Erica. 1982. The Dark Side of the Moonies. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Hong, Nansook. 1998. In the Shadow of the Moons: My Life in the Reverend Sun Myung Moon's Family. Boston: Little Brown.Google Scholar
Inglis, Michael (ed.). 2000. 40 Years in America: An Intimate History of the Unification Movement, 1959–1999. New York: HSA Publications.Google Scholar
Introvigne, Massimo. 2000. The Unification Church. Salt Lake City: Signature Books.Google Scholar
James, Gene (ed.). 1983. The Family and the Unification Church. New York: Rose of Sharon Press.Google Scholar
Katz, Jack. 1975. “Essences as Moral Identities: Verifiability and Responsibility in Imputations of Deviance and Charisma.” American Journal of Sociology 80: 1369–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemperman, Steve. 1981. Lord of the Second Advent. Ventura, CA: Regal Books.Google Scholar
Kim, David. 1977. Day of Hope, 2 vols. New York: Unification Church.Google Scholar
Lattin, Don. 2001. “Continuation of the Church Will Fall to Moon's Son.” San Francisco Chronicle, February 11.
Mickler, Michael. 1987. “Future Prospects of the Unification Church.” In Bromley, David G. and Hammond, Phillip (eds.), The Future of New Religious Movements (pp. 175–86). Macon, GA: Mercer University Press.Google Scholar
Mickler, Michael. 2006. “The Unification Church/Movement in the United States.” In Gallagher, Eugene and Ashcraft, W. Michael (eds.), Introduction to New and Alternative Religions in America: Asian Traditions (vol. IV, pp. 158–84). Westport, CT: Greenwood.Google Scholar
Moon, Sun Myung. 1983. “New Impetus for the Providence in America.” Today's World 4 (February): 23–5.Google Scholar
Publius, . 1986. “Interchangeable Moon Units?” The Round Table (March): 2–3.
Swatland, Susan and Swatland, Anne. 1982. Escape from the Moonies. London: New English Library.Google Scholar
Underwood, Barbara and Betty, Underwood. 1979. Hostage to Heaven. New York: Clarkson N. Potter.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1964. The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. Trans. by Henderson, A. M. and Parsons, Talcott. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Wood, Allen Tate. 1979. Moonstruck: A Memoir of My Life in a Cult. New York: William Morrow.Google Scholar
Zald, Mayer and Michael, Berger. 1978. “Social Movements in Organizations: Coup d'Etat, Insurgency, and Mass Movements.” American Journal of Sociology 83: 823–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×