Book contents
- Searching for Contemporary Legal Thought
- Reviews
- Searching for Contemporary Legal Thought
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction: Searching for Contemporary Legal Thought: History, Image, and Structure
- Part I Histories of the Legal Contemporary
- Part II Images of the Legal Contemporary?
- Part III Structures of the Legal Contemporary
- Index
- References
Part I - Histories of the Legal Contemporary
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 December 2017
Book contents
- Searching for Contemporary Legal Thought
- Reviews
- Searching for Contemporary Legal Thought
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction: Searching for Contemporary Legal Thought: History, Image, and Structure
- Part I Histories of the Legal Contemporary
- Part II Images of the Legal Contemporary?
- Part III Structures of the Legal Contemporary
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Searching for Contemporary Legal Thought , pp. 21 - 196Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Works Cited – Chapter 1
Arrighi, Giovanni 1994. The Long Twentieth Century: Money, Power, and the Origins of Our Times. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Baucom, Ian 2007. Specters of the Atlantic: Finance Capital, Slavery, and the Philosophy of History. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Walter, Benjamin 1999. The Arcades Project. Eiland, Howard and McLaughlin, Kevin (transl.) Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter 2002. “Eduard Fuchs, collector and historian,” in Eiland & Jennings (eds.), pp. 260–302.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter 2004a. “On language as such and on the language of man,” in Bullock and Jennings (eds.), pp. 62–74.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter 2004b. “On the program of the coming philosophy,” in Bullock and Jennings (eds.), pp. 100–10.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter 2005. “Literary history and the study of literature,” in Jennings, , Eiland, , and Smith, (eds.), pp. 459–65.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter 2006a. “Exchange with Theodor W. Adorno on ‘The Paris of the Second Empire in Baudelaire,’” in Eiland, and Jennings, (eds.), pp. 99–115.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter 2006b. “On the concept of history,” in Eiland, and Jennings, (eds.), pp. 389–400.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter 2008. The Origin of German Tragic Drama [1925], Weber, Samuel (transl.) in Weber 2008, pp. 88–9.Google Scholar
Bullock, Marcus and Jennings, Michael W. (eds.) 2004. Walter Benjamin: Selected Writings, Volume 1, 1913–1926. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Coase, Ronald H. 1993. “Law and economics at Chicago,” Journal of Law and Economics 36: 239–54.Google Scholar
Coase, Ronald H. 1994. “Economics at LSE in the 1930s: a personal view,” in Coase, Ronald H., Essays on Economics and Economists. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 208–14.Google Scholar
Cohen, Amy J. 2012. “ADR and some thoughts on the social in Duncan Kennedy's Third globalization of legal thought,” Comparative Law Review 3: 1.5.Google Scholar
Cohen, Amy J. 2015. “The law and political economy of contemporary food: some reflections on the local and the small,” Law & Contemporary Problems 78: 101–45.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques 1994. Specters of Marx: The State of the Debt, the Work of Mourning and the New International, Kamuf, Peggy (transl.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Desautels-Stein, Justin 2014. “Pragmatic liberalism: the outlook of the dead,” Boston College Law Review 55: 1041–98.Google Scholar
Dezalay, Yves and Garth, Bryant G 2002. “Legitimating the new legal orthodoxy,” in Dezalay, Yves and Garth, Bryant G. (eds.) Global Prescriptions: The Production, Exportation, and Importation of a New Legal Orthodoxy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. 306–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eiland, Howard and Jennings, Michael W. (eds.) 2002. Walter Benjamin: Selected Writings, Volume 3, 1935–1938. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Eiland, Howard and Jennings, Michael W. (eds.) 2006. Walter Benjamin: Selected Writings, Volume 4, 1938–1940. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Fernandez, Angela and Dubber, Markus Dirk (eds.) 2012. Law Books in Action: Essays on the Anglo-American Legal Treatise. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel 2010b. The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978–79. Burchell, Graham (transl.) New York: Picador Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Friedman, Milton 1966. “The methodology of positive economics,” in Friedman, Milton, Essays in Positive Economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 3–43.Google Scholar
Gordon, Colin (ed.) 1980. Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972–1977, by Michel Foucault. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Gruber, Aya 2012. “Duncan Kennedy's third globalization, criminal law, and the spectacle,” Comparative Law Review 3: 34.Google Scholar
Harcourt, Bernard 2011. The Illusion of Free Markets: Punishment and the Myth of Natural Order. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Horwitz, Morton J. 1976. “Part III – Treatise literature,” Law Library Journal 69: 460–1.Google Scholar
Jennings, Michael W. 1987. Dialectical Images: Walter Benjamin's Theory of Literary Criticism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Jennings, Michael W., Eiland, Howard, and Smith, Gary (eds.) 2005. Walter Benjamin: Selected Writings, Volume 2, Part 2, 1931–1934. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan 2006. “Three globalizations of law and legal thought: 1850–2000,” in Trubek, and Santos, (eds.), pp. 19–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan 2014. “The hermeneutic of suspicion in contemporary American legal thought,” Law and Critique 25: 91–139.Google Scholar
Keynes, John Neville. 1891. The Scope and Method of Political Economy. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kitch, Edmund W. 1983. “The fire of truth: a remembrance of law and economics at Chicago, 1932–1970,” Journal of Law and Economics 26: 163–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, Kunal M. 2011. “Law ‘in’ and ‘as’ history: the common law and the American polity, 1790–1900,” UC Irvine Law Review 1: 587–609.Google Scholar
Person, Heath 1997. Origins of Law and Economics: The Economists’ New Science of Law, 1830–1930. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pottage, Alain 2012. “The materiality of what?” Journal of Law and Society 39: 167–83.Google Scholar
Salaymeh, Lena 2016. The Beginnings of Islamic Law: Late Antique Islamicate Legal Traditions. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schlag, Pierre 2009. “The dedifferentiation problem,” Continental Philosophy Review 42: 35–62.Google Scholar
Simon, William 2015. “The organizational premises of administrative law,” Law & Contemporary Problems 78: 61–100.Google Scholar
Skousen, Mark 2009. The Making of Modern Economics: The Lives and Ideas of the Great Thinkers. New York: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam 1981. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Tomlins, Christopher 2004. “History in the American juridical field: narrative, justification, and explanation,” Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities 16: 323–98.Google Scholar
Tomlins, Christopher 2007. “How autonomous is law?” Annual Reviews in Law and Social Science 3: 45–68.Google Scholar
Tomlins, Christopher 2012. “Commentary: effects of scale: toward a history of the literature of law,” in Fernandez, and Dubber, (eds.), pp. 220–42.Google Scholar
Trubek, David and Santos, Alvaro 2006. The New Law and Economic Development: A Critical Appraisal. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Unger, Roberto M. 2015. The Critical Legal Studies Movement: Another Time, a Greater Task. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Zutshi, Patrick N.R. 1995. Letters of Frederick William Maitland, Volume II. London: Selden Society.Google Scholar
Works Cited – Chapter 2
Agamben, Giorgio 2013. Opus Dei: An Archaeology of Duty. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Byrne, Susan 2012. Law and History in Cervantes’ Don Quixote. University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Cormack, Bradin 2008. A Power to Do Justice. Jurisdiction, English Literature, and the Rise of the Common Law, 1509–1625. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dorsett, Shaunnagh and McVeigh, Shaun 2007. “The persona of the jurist in Salmond's Jurisprudence: on the exposition of ‘what law is…,’” Victoria University of Wellington Law Review, 38: 771–96.Google Scholar
Goodrich, Peter 2004. “The immense rumor,” Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities, 16: 199–242.Google Scholar
Goodrich, Peter 2009. “Intellection and indiscipline,” Journal of Law & Society, 36: 460–80.Google Scholar
Goodrich, Peter 2015. “Mos Americanus or common law in partibus infidelium,” Villanova Law Review, 60: 521–48.Google Scholar
Gordley, James 2013. The Jurists: A Critical History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan 1979. “The structure of Blackstone's Commentaries,” Buffalo Law Review, 28: 205–382.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan 1997. A Critique of Adjudication: Fin de Siècle. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan 2004. “Afterword,” in Kennedy, Duncan, Legal Training and the Reproduction of Hierarchy. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan 2014. “The hermeneutic of suspicion in contemporary American legal thought,” Law and Critique, 25: 91–139.Google Scholar
Langdell, Christopher Columbus 1871. A Selection of Cases on the Law of Contracts. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Legendre, Pierre 1992. Les Enfants du Texte: Étude sur la Fonction Parentale des États. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
MacCormick, Neil 1978. Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Milsom, Stroud F. C. 2003. A Natural History of the Common Law. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Murphy, Tim 1999. “The Britcrits: subversion and submission, past, present and future,” Law and Critique, 10: 237–78.Google Scholar
Pether, Penny 1999. “On foreign ground: grand narratives, situated specificities, and the praxis of critical theory and law,” Law and Critique, 10: 211–36.Google Scholar
Pether, Penny 2001. “Discipline and punish: despatches from the citation manual wars and other (literally) unspeakable stories,” Griffith Law Review, 10: 101–35.Google Scholar
Rosenstock-Huessy, Eugene [1938] 1969. Out of Revolution: Autobiography of Western Man. Norwich, VT: Argo.Google Scholar
Supiot, Alain 2007. Homo Juridicus: On the Anthropological Function of the Law. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Teles, Steven 2008. The Rise of the Conservative Legal Movement. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tomlins, Christopher 2013. “Law ‘and’, law ‘in’, law ‘as’: the definition, rejection and recuperation of the socio-legal enterprise.” Law in Context, 29: 137–63.Google Scholar
Unger, Roberto M. 2015. The Critical Legal Studies Movement. Another Time, a Greater Task. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Wright, William 1811. Advice on the Study of Law with Directions for the Choice of Books, Addressed to Attorney's Clerks, and additional Notes for the American Student. Maryland.Google Scholar
Works Cited – Chapter 3
Ahdieh, Robert 2004. “Between dialogue and decree: international review of national courts,” New York University Law Review 79: 2029–163.Google Scholar
Berman, Paul Schiff 2012. Global Legal Pluralism: A Jurisprudence of Law beyond Borders. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Berman, Paul Schiff 2014. “Ruth Bader Ginsburg and the interaction of legal systems,” in Dodson, (ed.), pp. 151–71.Google Scholar
Boele-Woelki, Katharina and Grosheide, Willem (eds.) 2007. The Future of European Contract Law: Essays in Honour of Ewoud Hondius. Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar
Born, Georgina 2010. “On Tardean relations: temporality and ethnography,” in Candea, (ed.), pp. 232–49.Google Scholar
Cotterrell, Roger and Del Mar, Maksymilian (eds.) 2016. Authority in Transnational Legal Theory. Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Cover, Robert and Aleinikoff, T. Alexander 1977. “Dialectical federalism: habeas corpus and the court,” Yale Law Journal 86: 1035–102.Google Scholar
Darwall, Stephen 2006. The Second-Person Standpoint. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Del Mar, Maksymilian 2015. “Legal fictions and legal change in the common law tradition,” in Del Mar, and Twining, (eds.), pp. 225–54.Google Scholar
Del Mar, Maksymilian 2016. “Imaginaries of authority: towards an archaeology of disagreement,” in Cotterrell, and Del Mar, (eds.), pp. 220–50.Google Scholar
Del Mar, Maksymilian, and Lobban, Michael (eds.) 2016. Law in Theory and History: New Essays on a Neglected Dialogue. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Del Mar, Maksymilian and Twining, William (eds.) 2015. Legal Fictions in Theory and Practice. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Delmas-Marty, Mireille 2002. Towards a Truly Common Law: Europe as a Laboratory for Legal Pluralism. Norberg, N. (transl.) Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dodson, Scott (ed.) 2014. The Legacy of Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, Mervin 1988. The Nature of the Common Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Fleming, John (ed.) 2014. Nomos LV: Federalism and Subsidiarity. New York University Press.Google Scholar
Glenn, Patrick 2007. “Multivalent logic and the Rome Convention,” in Boele-Woelki and Grosheide (eds.), pp. 283–290.Google Scholar
Glenn, Patrick 2014. “Transnational legal thought: Plato, Europe and beyond,” in Maduro, , Tuori, , and Sankari, (eds.), pp. 61–77.Google Scholar
Gurevitch, Zali 1988. “The other side of dialogue: on making the other strange and the experience of otherness,” American Journal of Sociology 93: 1179–99.Google Scholar
Hogan, Patrick Colm 2014. “Intertextuality and allusion,” in Stockwell, and Whiteley, (eds.), pp. 117–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krisch, Nico 2010. Beyond Constitutionalism: The Pluralist Structure of Postnational Law. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Maduro, Miguel, Tuori, Kaarlo, and Sankari, Suvi (eds.) 2014. Transnational Law: Rethinking European Law and Legal Thinking. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Resnik, Judith 2014. “Federalism(s)'s forms and norms: contesting rights, de-essentializing jurisdictional divides, and temporizing accommodations,” in Fleming, (ed.), pp. 363–436.Google Scholar
Stockwell, Peter and Whiteley, Sara (eds.) 2014. The Cambridge Handbook of Stylistics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Strathern, Margaret 2005. Kinship, Law, and the Unexpected: Relatives Are Always a Surprise. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tomlins, Christopher 2016. “Historicism and materiality in legal theory,” in Del Mar, and Lobban, (eds.), pp. 57–83.Google Scholar
Cases Cited – Chapter 3
Works Cited – Chapter 4
Alston, Philip 2013. “Does the past matter? On the origins of human rights,” Harvard Law Review 126: 2043–81.Google Scholar
Agha, Petr (ed.) 2017. Human Rights between Law and Politics: The Margin of Appreciation in Post-National Contexts. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Benhabib, S. 2012. “Moving beyond false binarisms: on Samuel Moyn's The Last Utopia,” Qui Parle 22: 81–93.Google Scholar
Douzinas, Costas 2000. The End of Human Rights: Critical Legal Thought at the Turn of the Century. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel 1983. “On the genealogy of ethics: an overview of a work in progress,” in Rabinow, (ed.), pp. 253–80.Google Scholar
Golder, Ben 2016. “On the genealogy of human rights: an essay on nostalgia nostalgia,” Australian Journal of Human Rights 22: 17–36.Google Scholar
Golder, Ben 2017. [Forthcoming]. “On the varieties of universalism in human rights discourse,” in Agha, (ed.)Google Scholar
Gordon, Robert W. 1997. “Foreword: the arrival of critical historicism,” Stanford Law Review 49: 1023–9.Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, Eric and Ranger, Terence 1983. The Invention of Tradition. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Honig, Bonnie 2009. Emergency Politics: Paradox, Law, Democracy. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ishay, Micheline 2004. The History of Human Rights: From Ancient Times to the Globalization Era. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Joas, Hans 2013. The Sacredness of the Person: A New Genealogy of Human Rights. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan 2006. “Three globalizations of law and legal thought: 1850–2000,” in Trubek, and Santos, (eds.), pp. 19–73.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan 2014. “The hermeneutic of suspicion in contemporary American legal thought,” Law and Critique 25: 91–139.Google Scholar
Kinley, David, Sadurski, Wojciech, and Walton, Kevin (eds.) 2013. Human Rights: Old Problems, New Possibilities. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Koopman, Colin 2013. Genealogy as Critique: Foucault and the Problems of Modernity. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti 2005. “International law in Europe: between tradition and renewal,” European Journal of International Law 16: 113–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lauren, Paul G. 2003. The Evolution of International Human Rights: Visions Seen. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Marks, Susan 2013. “Four human rights myths,” in Kinley, Sadurski, and Walton, (eds.), pp. 217–35.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl 1954. The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte. 3rd ed. London: Lawrence and Wishart.Google Scholar
McCrudden, Christopher 2014. “Human Rights Histories,” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 35: 179–212.Google Scholar
Moyn, Samuel 2010. The Last Utopia: Human Rights in History. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Moyn, Samuel 2012. “Substance, scale, and salience: the recent historiography of human rights,” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 8: 123–40.Google Scholar
Moyn, Samuel 2015. “Tony Judt's ‘when the facts change’,” New York Times. [Online]. Available at http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/18/books/review/tony-judts-when-the-facts-change.html?_r=0.Google Scholar
Rabinow, Paul 1997. Ethics: Subjectivity and Truth (Essential Works of Foucault 1954–1984, Vol 1). Harmondsworth: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Rose, Nikolas 2007. The Politics of Life Itself: Biomedicine, Power and Subjectivity in the 21st Century. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tomlins, Christopher 2012. “What is left of the law and society paradigm after critique? Revisiting Gordon's ‘critical legal histories’,” Law & Social Inquiry 37: 155–66.Google Scholar
Trubek, David M. and Santos, Alvaro (eds.) 2006. The New Law and Economic Development: A Critical Appraisal. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Works Cited – Chapter 5
Ackerman, Bruce 1991–2014. We the People. 3 vols. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Balkin, Jack M. 2007. “The other side of critical legal theory,” Balkinization, May 3. http://balkin.blogspot.com/2007/05/other-side-of-critical-legal-theory.html.Google Scholar
Balkin, Jack M. and Siegel, Reva B. (eds.) 2009. The Constitution in 2020. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Blalock, Corinne 2014. “Neoliberalism and the crisis of legal theory,” Law and Contemporary Problems 77: 71–104.Google Scholar
Brown, Wendy 2015. Undoing the Demos: Neoliberalism's Stealth Revolution. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
Desautels-Stein, Justin 2015. “Structuralist legal histories,” Law and Contemporary Problems 78: 37–60.Google Scholar
Felsch, Philipp 2015. Der Lange Sommer der Theorie: Geschichte einer Revolte, 1960–1990. Munich: C. H. Beck.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel 2003. “Society Must Be Defended”: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1975–1976, Ewald, François et al. (eds.), Macey, David (transl.). New York: Picador.Google Scholar
Golder, Ben and McLoughlin, Daniel (eds.) forthcoming. The Politics of Legality in a Neoliberal Age. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Goldberg, John C. P. 2012. “Pragmatism and private law,” Harvard Law Review 125: 1640–63.Google Scholar
Hart, Henry M., Jr., and Sacks, Albert M. 1994. The Legal Process: Basic Problems in the Making and Application of Law, Frickey, Philip P. and Eskridge, William N., Jr. (eds.). Westbury: Foundation Press.Google Scholar
Kalman, Laura 2005. Yale Law School and the Sixties: Revolt and Reverberations. Raleigh: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan 1997. Critique of Adjudication (fin-de-siècle). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan 2006. “Three globalizations of law and legal thought: 1850–2000,” in Trubek, and Santos, (eds.), pp. 19–73.Google Scholar
Rasulov, Akbar 2014. “CLS and Marxism: the history of an affair,” Transnational Legal Theory 5: 622–39.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin (ed.) 1990. The Return of Grand Theory in the Human Sciences. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tomlins, Christopher L. 2015. “The presence and absence of legal mind: a comment on Duncan Kennedy's three globalizations,” Law and Contemporary Problems 78: 1–17.Google Scholar
Trubek, David M. and Santos, Alvaro 2006. The New Law and Economic Development: A Critical Appraisal. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark 1991. “The critical legal studies movement: a political history,” Yale Law Journal 100: 1515–44.Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark 1999. Taking the Constitution Away from the Courts. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Unger, Roberto Mangabeira 1983. Knowledge and Politics. New York: Free Press (rev. ed.).Google Scholar
Unger, Roberto Mangabeira 1986. The Critical Legal Studies Movement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Unger, Roberto Mangabeira 2015. The Critical Legal Studies Movement: Another Time, a Greater Task. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Vermeule, Adrian 2007. Mechanisms of Democracy: Institutional Design Writ Small. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Works Cited – Chapter 6
Barrozo, Paulo 2015a. “The great alliance: history, reason, and will in modern law,” Law and Contemporary Problems 78: 235–70.Google Scholar
Barrozo, Paulo 2015b. “A future for legal education: a reaction to Hupper's educational ambivalence: the rise of a foreign-student doctorate in law,” New England Law Review Symposium 49: 485–97.Google Scholar
Bobbio, Norberto. 2014. Dalla Struttura alla Funzione: Nuovi Studi di Teoria del Diritto. Roma: Editori Laterza.Google Scholar
Brunkhorst, Hauke. 2014. Critical Theory of Legal Revolutions: Evolutionary Perspectives. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Coleman, Jules and Shapiro, Scott J. (eds.) 2004. The Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Collins, Randall 2000. The Sociology of Philosophies: A Global Theory of Intellectual Change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Desautels-Stein, Justin 2014a. “Chiastic law in the crystal ball: exploring legal formalism and its alternative futures,” London Review of International Law 2: 263–96.Google Scholar
Desautels-Stein, Justin 2014b. “Pragmatic liberalism: the outlook of the dead,” Boston College Law Review 55: 1041–98.Google Scholar
Donzelot, Jacques 1994. L'Invention du Social: Essai Sur le Déclin des Passions Politiques. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel 1995. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Fried, Charles 1980. “The laws of change: the cunning of reason in moral and legal history.” 9 Journal of Legal Studies 2: 335–53.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony 1986. The Constitution of Society. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen 1999. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hayward, Abraham 1986 (1828). “Preface” to Friedrich Carl von Savigny. Of the Vocation of Our Age for Legislation and Jurisprudence. Birmingham, AL: Legal Classics Library.Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg W. F. 2003. Elements of the Philosophy of Right. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel 1999. The Metaphysics of Morals. In Immanuel Kant, Practical Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kelly, Donald 1990. The Human Measure: Social Thought in the Western Legal Tradition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan 1975. The Rise and Fall of Classical Legal Thought. Privately published.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti 2007. From Apology to Utopia: The Structure of International Legal Argument. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha 2010. Liberty of Conscience: In Defense of America's Tradition of Religious Equality. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Perju, Vlad 2010. “Cosmopolitanism and constitutional self-government,” International Journal of Constitutional Law 8: 326–53.Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph. 1980. The Concept of a Legal System: An Introduction to the Theory of the Legal System. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph 1997. The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Savigny, Friedrich Carl von. 1986. Of the Vocation of Our Age for Legislation and Jurisprudence. Birmingham, AL: Legal Classics Library.Google Scholar
Schiavone, Aldo 2011. The Invention of Law in the West. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schlegel, John Henry 2011. American Legal Realism and Empirical Social Sciences. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Sperber, Jonathan 1994. The European Revolutions, 1848–1851. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schlag, Pierre 1991. “Normativity and the politics of form,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 139: 801–932.Google Scholar
Searle, John R. 2005. “What is an institution?” Journal of Institutional Economics 1: 1–22.Google Scholar
Summers, Robert S. 2009. Form and Function in a Legal System: A General Study. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tomlins, Christopher 2010. Freedom Bound: Law, Labor, and Civic Identity in Colonizing English America, 1580–1865. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Unger, Roberto M. 1977. Law in Modern Society: Toward a Criticism of Social Theory. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Unger, Roberto M. 1986. The Critical Legal Studies Movement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Weinrib, Ernest J. 1995. The Idea of Private Law. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wells, Catharine P. 1988. “Legal innovation within the wider intellectual tradition: the pragmatism of Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.,” Northwestern University Law Review 82: 544–95.Google Scholar
Works Cited – Chapter 7
Auerbach, Jerold 1976. Unequal Justice: Lawyers and Social Change in Modern America. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Berman, Harold J. 1983. Law and Revolution: The Formation of the Western Legal Tradition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Biskupic, Joan, Roberts, Janet, and Shiffman, John 2014. “The echo chamber: a small group of lawyers and its outsized influence at the U.S. Supreme Court,” Reuters Special Report, December 8. http://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/scotus/1/52Google Scholar
Blumenthal, Sidney 1988. The Rise of the Counter-Establishment. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre 1986. “The force of law: toward a sociology of the juridical field,” Hastings Law Journal 38: 805–53.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre 1998. The State Nobility: Elite Schools in the Field of Power. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre 2012. Sur l’État: Cours au Collège de France (1989–1992). Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Brundage, James 2008. The Medieval Origins of the Legal Profession. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Coates, Benjamin 2015. “Securing hegemony through law: Venezuela, the U.S. asphalt trust, and the uses of international law, 1904–1909,” The Journal of American History 102: 380–405.Google Scholar
Coates, Benjamin 2016. Legalist Empire: The United States, Civilization, and International Law in the Early Twentieth Century. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Condliffe, Ellen Lagemann 1992. The Politics of Knowledge: The Carnegie Corporation, Philanthropy, and Public Policy. New York: Carnegie.Google Scholar
Dezalay, Yves, and Garth, Bryant G. 1996. Dealing in Virtue: International Commercial Arbitration and the Development of a Transnational Legal Field. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dezalay, Yves, and Garth, Bryant G 2002. The Internationalization of Palace Wars: Lawyers, Economists, and the Contest to Transform Latin American States. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dezalay, Yves and Garth, Bryant 2006. “From the cold war to Kosovo: The rise and renewal of international human rights law as a socio-legal field,” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 2: 231–55.Google Scholar
Dezalay, Yves and Garth, Bryant G 2015. “Public interest law, corporate law firms, and the structure of the U.S. legal field: the sociological context for ‘law and social change.’” Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Dezalay, Yves and Garth, Bryant G 2016. “Constructing a transatlantic marketplace of disputes on the symbolic foundations of international justice,” in Mallard, Grégoire and Sgard, Jérôme (eds.), Contractual Knowledge: One Hundred Years of Legal Experimentation in Global Markets. Cambridge University Press, pp. 185–214.Google Scholar
Fourcade, Marion 2009. Economists and Societies: Discipline and Profession in the United States, Britain, and France, 1890s to 1990s. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Garth, Bryant G. and Sterling, Joyce 1998. “From legal realism to law and society: reshaping law for the last stages of the social activist state,” Law and Society Review 32: 409–471.Google Scholar
Gawalt, Gerald W. (ed.) 1984. The New High Priests: Lawyers in Post-Civil War America. Westport: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Gordon, Robert W. 1984. “The ideal and the actual in the law: fantasies and practices of New York City lawyers, 1870–1910,” in Gawalt, (ed.), pp. 51–74.Google Scholar
Hackney, James R. 2012. Legal Intellectuals in Conversation: Reflections on the Construction of Contemporary Legal Theory. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
Hollis-Brusky, Amanda 2011. “Support structures and constitutional change,” Law & Social Inquiry 36: 551–74.Google Scholar
Hollis-Brusky, Amanda 2012. “Helping ideas have consequences,” Denver University Law Review 89: 197–243.Google Scholar
Hollis-Brusky, Amanda 2013. “It's the network: the Federalist Society as a supplier of intellectual capital for the Supreme Court,” Studies in Law, Politics, & Society 61: 137–78.Google Scholar
Hollis-Brusky, Amanda 2015. Ideas with Consequences: The Federalist Society and the Conservative Counterrevolution. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kabaservice, Geoffrey 2005. The Guardians: Kingman Brewster, His Circle, and the Rise of the Liberal Establishment. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kantorowicz, Ernst 1997. The King's Two Bodies: A Study in Medieval Political Theology. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti 2001. The Gentle Civilizer of Nations: The Rise and Fall of International Law 1870–1960. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Powell, Michael 1988. From Patrician to Professional Elite: The Transformation of the New York City Bar Association. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
Sacriste, Guillaume 2011. La République des Constitutionnalistes: Professeurs de Droit et Légitimation de l’État en France (1870–1914). Paris: Sciences-Po.Google Scholar
Sacriste, Guillaume and Vauchez, Antoine 2007. “The force of international law: lawyers’ diplomacy on the international scene in the 1920s.” Law and Social Inquiry 32: 83–107.Google Scholar
Schlegel, John Henry 1995. American Legal Realism and Empirical Social Science. University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Southworth, Ann 2008. Lawyers of the Right: Professionalizing the Conservative Coalition. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Teles, Steven 2008. The Rise of the Conservative Legal Movement: The Battle for Control over the Law. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Teles, Steven 2009. “Transformative bureaucracy: Reagan's lawyers and the dynamics of political investment,” Studies in American Political Development 23: 61–88.Google Scholar
Tomlins, Christopher 2000. “Framing the field of law's disciplinary encounters: a historical narrative,” Law & Society Review 34: 911–72.Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark 1979. “Truth, justice, and the American Way: an interpretation of public law scholarship in the seventies,” Texas Law Review 57: 1307–58.Google Scholar
Vauchez, Antoine 2007. “Une élite d'intermédiaires. Genèse d'un capital juridique européen (1950 – 1970),“ Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales 1, 166–7): 54–65.Google Scholar
Vauchez, Antoine 2014. “The international way of expertise: the first world court and the genesis of transnational expert fields,” European University Institute. Working Paper 2014–80.Google Scholar
Works Cited – Chapter 8
Agamben, Giorgio 2009. “What is the contemporary?” in What is an Apparatus? And Other Essays. Kishik, David and Pedatella, Stefan (transl.). Stanford University Press, pp. 39–54.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas 2002. On Law, Morality and Politics. Regan, Richard J. (transl.). Indianapolis: Hackett (2d ed.).Google Scholar
Augustine, 1993. On Free Choice of the Will. Williams, Thomas (transl.). Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Austin, John 1832. The Province of Jurisprudence Determined. London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson, 1954.Google Scholar
Barton, David and Papen, Uta (eds.) 2010. The Anthropology of Writing: Understanding Textually Mediated Worlds. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Barzelay, Michael 2001. New Public Management: Improving Research and Policy Dialogue. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy 1948. Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Constable, Marianne 1991. “Sociological justice and jurisprudential nihilism,” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 11: 114–24.Google Scholar
Constable, Marianne 1994. “Genealogy and jurisprudence: Nietzsche, nihilism and the social scientification of law,” Law and Social Inquiry 19: 551–90.Google Scholar
Constable, Marianne 2005. Just Silences: the Limits and Possibilities of Modern Law. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Constable, Marianne 2007. “The shuffle of things: law and knowledge in ‘modern society’,” Theoretical Inquiries in Law 8: 73–90.Google Scholar
Constable, Marianne 2014. Our Word Is Our Bond: How Legal Speech Acts. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Dean, Jodi 2005. “Communicative capitalism: circulation and the foreclosure of politics,” Cultural Politics 1: 51–73.Google Scholar
Desautels-Stein, Justin and Kennedy, Duncan 2015. “Foreword: theorizing contemporary legal thought,” Law and Contemporary Problems 78: i–ix.Google Scholar
Desautels-Stein, Justin and Tomlins, Christopher 2014. Project description (email attachment, 15 July 2014).Google Scholar
Di Leo, Jeffrey R. and Mehan, Uppinder (eds.) 2014. Capitalism at the Brink: Overcoming the Destructive Legacies of Neoliberalism. Ann Arbor: Open Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Dunleavy, Patrick, Margetts, Helen, Bastow, Simon and Tinkler, Jane 2006. “New public management is dead – long live digital-era governance,” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 16: 467–94.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel 1977. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Sheridan, Alan (transl.). New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Gerth, Hans H. and Mills, C. Wright (eds.) 1946. From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Griffith, Alison I. and Smith, Dorothy E. (eds.) 2014. Under New Public Management: Institutional Ethnographies of Changing Front-Line Work. University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin 1987. Nietzsche, Vol. 3. Stambaugh, Joan et al. (transl.). New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Johnson, Phil, Wood, Geoffrey, Brewster, Chris, and Brookes, Michael 2009. “The rise of post-bureaucracy: theorists’ fancy or organizational praxis?” International Sociology 24: 37–61.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel 1964. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. Paton, H. J. (transl.). New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan 2006. “Three globalizations of law and legal thought: 1850–2000,” in Trubek, and Santos, (eds.), pp. 19–73.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno 2010. The Making of Law: an Ethnography of the Conseil d'Etat. Marina Brilman and Alain Pottage (transl.). Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno and Woolgar, Steve 1986. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas 1992. “Operational closure and structural coupling: the differentiation of the legal system,” Cardozo Law Review 13: 1419–41.Google Scholar
Maturana, H. 1988. “Reality: the search for objectivity or the quest for a compelling argument,” Irish Journal of Psychology 9: 25–82.Google Scholar
Maturana, H. and Varela, F. 1980. Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Mingers, John 1995. Self-Producing Systems: Implications and Applications of Autopoiesis. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Moon, M. J. 2002. “The evolution of e-government among municipalities: rhetoric or reality?” Public Administration Review 62: 424–33.Google Scholar
Moretti, Franco and Pestre, Dominique 2015. “Bankspeak: the language of World Bank reports,” New Left Review vol. 92. (http://newleftreview.org/II/92/franco-moretti-dominique-pestre-ban… Accessed April 1, 2015).Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich 1990. Twilight of the Idols. Hollingdale, R. J. (transl.). London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Passavant, Paul 2014. “Neoliberalism and violent appearances,” in Di Leo, and Mehan, (eds.), pp. 30–71.Google Scholar
Selznick, Philip 1961. “Sociology and natural law,” Natural Law Forum. Paper 61. http://scholarship.law.nd.edu/nd_naturallaw_forum/61Google Scholar
Simon, William H. 1983. “Legality, bureaucracy, and class in the welfare system,” Yale Law Journal 92: 1198–269.Google Scholar
Simon, William H. 2015. “The organizational premises of administrative law,” Law and Contemporary Problems 78: 61–100.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R. 2013. “Commentary: the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs: myths and realities,” Harvard Law Review 126: 1838–78.Google Scholar
Trubek, David M. and Santos, Alvaro (eds.) 2006. The New Law and Economic Development: A Critical Appraisal. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tusting, Karin 2010. “Eruptions of interruptions: managing tensions between writing and other tasks in a textualized childcare workplace,” in Barton, and Papen, (eds.), pp. 67–89.Google Scholar
Unger, Roberto M. 1983. The Critical Legal Studies Movement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Vismann, Cornelia 2008. Files: Law and Media Technology. Winthrop-Young, Geoffrey (transl.) Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Wiener, Norbert 1964. God & Golem, Inc.: A Comment on Certain Points Where Cybernetics Impinges on Religion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Works Cited – Chapter 9
Aubry, Marie-Pierre 2007. “Chronostratigraphic terminology: building on principles,” Stratigraphy 4: 117–25.Google Scholar
Autin, Whitney J. and Holbrook, John M. 2012. “Is the Anthropocene an issue of stratigraphy or pop culture?” GSA Today 22: 60–1.Google Scholar
Bonneuil, Christophe and Fressoz, Jean-Baptiste 2013. L'Evénement Anthropocène. La Terre, l'Histoire et Nous. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Chakrabarty, Dipesh 2009. “The climate of history: four theses,” Critical Inquiry 35: 197–222.Google Scholar
Cockell, Charles, Koebel, Christian, and Gilmour, Iain (eds.) 2006. Biological Processes Associated with Impact Events New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Crutzen, Paul J. and Birks, John W. 1982. “The atmosphere after a nuclear war: twilight at noon,” Ambio, 11: 114-25.Google Scholar
Crutzen, Paul 1995. “My Life With O3, NOx And Other YZOxs.” Available at: https://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/chemistry/laureates/1995/crutzen-lecture.pdfGoogle Scholar
Crutzen, Paul J. and Steffen, Will 2003. “How long have we been in the Anthropocene era?” Climate Change 61: 251–57.Google Scholar
Crutzen, Paul J. and Stoermer, Eugene F. 2000. “The Anthropocene,” IGBP Global Change Newsletter 41: 17–18.Google Scholar
Gumbrecht, Hans Ulrich 2010. Second-order observation historicized – an epistemological frame narrative. Available at: http://www.design-in-human.de/lectures/gumbrecht.htmlGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, Clive 2014. “Ecologists butt out. You are not entitled to redefine the Anthropocene.” Available at: http://clivehamilton.com/ecologists-butt-out-you-are-not-entitled-to-redefine-the-anthropocene/Google Scholar
Hamilton, Clive 2015a. “Getting the Anthropocene so wrong,” The Anthropocene Review 2: 102–7.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Clive 2015b. “Human destiny in the Anthropocene,” in Hamilton, , Gemenne, , and Bonneuil, (eds.), pp. 32–43.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Clive and Grinevald, Jacques 2015. “Was the Anthropocene anticipated?” The Anthropocene Review 2: 59–72.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Clive, Gemenne, François, and Bonneuil, Christophe (eds.) 2015. The Anthropocene and the Global Environmental Crisis: Rethinking Modernity in a New Epoch. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hüppauf, Bernd (ed.) 1997. War, Violence, and the Modern Condition, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Koselleck, Reinhart 2004. Futures Past. On the Semantics of Historical Time. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Kotzé, Louis J. 2014. “Human rights and the environment in the Anthropocene,” The Anthropocene Review 1: 252–75.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno 2010. “An attempt at a compositionist manifesto,” New Literary History, 41: 471–90.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno 2013. An Inquiry Into Modes of Existence. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno 2014. Agency in the time of the Anthropocene. New Literary History. 45: 1–18.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno 2015a. Face à Gaia. Huit Conférences sur le Nouveau Régime Climatique. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno 2015b. “Telling friend from foe in the Anthropocene,” in Hamilton, , Gemmene, , and Bonneuil, (eds.), 145–75.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas 2012. Theory of Society, volume 1. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas 2013. Theory of Society, volume 2. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Malm, Andreas and Hornborg, Alf 2014. “The geology of mankind?” The Anthropocene Review 1: 62–9.Google Scholar
McMahon, Darrin M. and Moyn, Samuel (eds.) 2014. Rethinking Modern European Intellectual History. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Müller, Jan-Werner 2014. “On conceptual history,” in McMahon, and Moyn, (eds.), pp. 74–93.Google Scholar
Ocampo, Adriana, Vajda, Vivi and Buffeteaut, Eric 2006. “Unravelling the Cretaceous-Paleogene (KT) turnover, evidence from flora, fauna and geology,” in Cockell, , Koebel, , and Gilmour, (eds.), pp. 197–219.Google Scholar
Pankakoski, Timo 2010. “Conflict, context, concreteness: Koselleck and Schmitt on concepts,” Political History 38: 749–99.Google Scholar
Ruddiman, William F. 2003. “The anthropogenic greenhouse era began thousands of years ago,” Climatic Change 61: 261–93.Google Scholar
Ruddiman, William F. and Thomson, Jonathan S. 2001. “The case for human causes of increased atmospheric CH4 over the last 5000 years,” Quaternary Science Reviews, 20: 1769–77.Google Scholar
Ruddiman, William F., John, E. Kutzbach and Steve, J. Vavrus 2011. “Can natural or anthropogenic explanations of late-Holocene CO2 and CH4 increases be falsified?” The Holocene, 21: 865–87.Google Scholar
Steffen, Will, Crutzen, Paul J. and McNeill, John R. 2007. “The Anthropocene: are humans now overwhelming the great forces of nature?” Ambio 36: 614–21.Google Scholar
Steffen, Will et al. 2011. “The Anthropocene: conceptual and historical perspectives.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 369: 842–67.Google Scholar
Turco, Richard P, Toon, Owen Brian, Ackerman, Thomas P, Pollack, James B. and Sagan, Carl 1983. “Nuclear winter. Global consequences of multiple nuclear explosions,” Science, 222: 1283–93.Google Scholar
Vidas, Davor. 2011. “The Anthropocene and the international law of the sea,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 369: 909–25.Google Scholar
Voosen, Paul 2012. “Geologists drive golden spike toward Anthropocene's base,” Greenwire, Monday, September 17, 2012. Available at http://www.eenews.net/stories/1059970036Google Scholar
Zalasiewicz, Jan et al. 2004. “Simplifying the stratigraphy of time,” Geology 32: 1–4.Google Scholar
Zalasiewicz, Jan et al. 2010 “The new world of the Anthropocene,” Environmental Science and Technology 44: 2228–31.Google Scholar
Zalasiewicz, Jan et al. 2014. “When did the Anthropocene begin? A mid-twentieth century boundary level is stratigraphically optimal,” Quatenary International 383: 196–203.Google Scholar