Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-7tdvq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-23T17:42:22.608Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Select bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2011

Roger Masterman
Affiliation:
University of Durham
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Separation of Powers in the Contemporary Constitution
Judicial Competence and Independence in the United Kingdom
, pp. 254 - 266
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allan, T. R. S., Law, Liberty and Justice: The Legal Foundations of British Constitutionalism (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Allan, T. R. S., Constitutional Justice: A Liberal Theory of the Rule of Law (Oxford University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Allison, J. W. F., The English Historical Constitution: Continuity, Change and European Effects (Cambridge University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashworth, A., Sentencing and Criminal Justice (4th edn) (Cambridge University Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagehot, W., The English Constitution (Oxford University Press, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bamforth, N. and Leyland, P. (eds), Public Law in a Multi-Layered Constitution (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2003).
Barendt, E., An Introduction to Constitutional Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Beatson, S., Grosz, S., Hickman, T., Singh, R. and Palmer, S., Human Rights: Judicial Protection in the United Kingdom (London: Sweet and Maxwell, 2008).Google Scholar
Bellamy, R., Political Constitutionalism: A Republican Defence of the Constitutionality of Democracy (Cambridge University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickel, A. M., The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics (Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1962).Google Scholar
Bingham of Cornhill, Lord, A New Supreme Court for the United Kingdom (London: Constitution Unit, 2002).Google Scholar
Blom-Cooper, L. and Drewry, G., Final Appeal (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1972).Google Scholar
Bogdanor, V., The New British Constitution (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2009).Google Scholar
Bradley, A. W. and Ewing, K. D., Constitutional and Administrative Law (14th edn) (Harlow: Pearson Longman, 2007).Google Scholar
Brazier, A., Kalitowski, S. and Rosenblatt, G., Law in the Making: Influence and Change in the Legislative Process (London: Hansard Society, 2008).Google Scholar
Brazier, R., Constitutional Reform: Reshaping the British Political System (3rd edn) (Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Law, Cambridge Centre for Public, Constitutional Reform in the United Kingdom: Practice and Principles (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 1998).Google Scholar
Campbell, T., Ewing, K. D. and Tomkins, A. (eds), Sceptical Essays on Human Rights (Oxford University Press, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, T., Goldsworthy, J. and Stone, A., Protecting Human Rights: Instruments and Institutions (Oxford University Press, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canivet, G., Andenas, M. and Fairgrieve, D., Independence, Accountability and the Judiciary (London: British Institute of International and Comparative Law, 2006).Google Scholar
Carmichael, P. and Dickson, B. (eds), The House of Lords: Its Parliamentary and Judicial Roles (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 1999).
Clapham, A., Human Rights in the Private Sphere (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Clayton, R., and Tomlinson, H., The Law of Human Rights (2nd edn) (Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Craig, P., Administrative Law (6th edn) (London: Sweet and Maxwell, 2008).Google Scholar
Craig, P. and Tomkins, A. (eds), The Executive and Public Law (Oxford University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Denning, , Lord, , From Precedent to Precedent (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1959).Google Scholar
Smith, S. A., Constitutional and Administrative Law (3rd edn) (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1977).
Dicey, A. V., Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution (Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1982).Google Scholar
Dicey, A. V., Lectures on the Relationship between Law and Public Opinion in England during the Nineteenth Century (London: Macmillan, 1914).Google Scholar
Dworkin, R., A Bill of Rights for Britain (London: Chatto and Windus, 1990).Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, D., Hunt, M. and Rishworth, P., A Simple Common Lawyer: Essays in Honour of Michael Taggart (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2009).Google Scholar
Elliott, M., The Constitutional Foundations of Judicial Review (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2001).Google Scholar
Evans, C. and Evans, S., Australian Bills of Rights: The Law of the Victorian Charter and the ACT Human Rights Act (Chatswood, NSW: LexisNexis Butterworths, 2008).Google Scholar
Ewing, K. D. and Gearty, C. A.Freedom under Thatcher: Civil Liberties in Modern Britain (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Ewing, K. D., Gearty, C. A. and Hepple, B. A., Human Rights and Labour Law: Essays for Paul O'Higgins (London: Mansell, 1994).Google Scholar
Fenwick, H., Civil Liberties and Human Rights (4th edn) (Abingdon: Routledge-Cavendish, 2007).Google Scholar
Fenwick, H. and Phillipson, G., Media Freedom under the Human Rights Act (Oxford University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Fenwick, H., Phillipson, G. and Masterman, R. (eds), Judicial Reasoning under the UK Human Rights Act (Cambridge University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foley, M., The Politics of the British Constitution (Manchester University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Forsyth, C. and Hare, I., The Golden Metwand and the Crooked Cord: Essays on Public Law in Honour of Sir William Wade QC (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gearty, C. A., Principles of Human Rights Adjudication (Oxford University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Gearty, C. A., Can Human Rights Survive? (Cambridge University Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, D. (ed.), Craies on Legislation (8th edn) (London: Sweet and Maxwell, 2004).
Griffith, J. A. G., The Politics of the Judiciary (5th edn) (London: Fontana Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Grosz, S., Beatson, J. and Duffy, P., Human Rights: The 1998 Act and The European Convention (London: Sweet and Maxwell, 2000).Google Scholar
Guest, A. G. (ed.), Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1961).
Gwyn, W. B., The Meaning of the Separation of Powers (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1965).Google Scholar
Hailsham, , Lord, , The Dilemma of Democracy: Diagnosis and Prescription (London: Collins, 1978).Google Scholar
Harlow, C. and Rawlings, R., Law and Administration (3rd edn) (Cambridge University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, D. J., O'Boyle, M., Bates, E. P. and Buckley, C. M., Law of the European Convention on Human Rights (Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A., The Concept of Law (2nd edn) (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Hartley, T. C. and Griffith, J. A. G., Government and Law (2nd edn) (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1981).Google Scholar
Hawkins, K. (ed.), The Human Face of Law: Essays in Honour of Donald Harris (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997).
Hewart, , Lord, , The New Despotism (London: Ernest Benn Ltd, 1929).Google Scholar
Hogg, P., Constitutional Law of Canada (Scarborough, Ont: Thomson Canada, 2004).Google Scholar
Hunt, M., Using Human Rights Law in English Courts (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 1997).Google Scholar
Huscroft, G. (ed.), Expounding the Constitution: Essays in Constitutional Theory (Cambridge University Press, 2008).CrossRef
Huscroft, G. and Rishworth, P. (eds), Litigating Rights: Perspectives from Domestic and International Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2002).
Irvine, , Lord, , Human Rights, Constitutional Law and the Development of the English Legal System (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2003).Google Scholar
Jennings, I., The Queen's Government (London: Penguin Books, 1961).Google Scholar
Jennings, I., The Law and the Constitution (5th edn) (University of London Press, 1967).Google Scholar
Jowell, J. and Oliver, D. (eds), The Changing Constitution (5th edn) (Oxford University Press, 2004).
Kavanagh, A., Constitutional Review under the UK Human Rights Act (Cambridge University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
King, A., The British Constitution (Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Sueur, A., ‘What is the Future for the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council?’ (London: Constitution Unit, 2001).
Leigh, I. and Masterman, R., Making Rights Real: The Human Rights Act in its First Decade (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2008).Google Scholar
Lord, Lester of Herne Hill and Pannick, D., Human Rights Law and Practice (London:Butterworths, 1999).Google Scholar
Leyland, P. and Woods, T., Administrative Law Facing the Future: Old Constraints and New Horizons (London: Blackstone Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Loughlin, M., Sword and Scales: An Examination of the Relationship between Law and Politics (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2000).Google Scholar
Loughlin, M., The Idea of Public Law (Oxford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Loveland, I., Constitutional Law, Administrative Law and Human Rights: A Critical Introduction (4th edn) (Oxford University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Lustgarten, L. and Leigh, I., In From the Cold: National Security and Parliamentary Democracy (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Madison, J., Hamilton, A. and Jay, J., The Federalist Papers (London: Penguin Classics, 1987).Google Scholar
Malleson, K., The New Judiciary: The Effects of Expansion and Activism (Dartmouth: Ashgate, 1999).Google Scholar
Manfredi, C. P., Judicial Power and the Charter: Canada and the Paradox of Liberal Constitutionalism (2nd edn) (Ontario: Oxford University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Marshall, G., Constitutional Theory (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1971).Google Scholar
Marshall, G., Constitutional Conventions (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Munro, C., Studies in Constitutional Law (2nd edn) (London: Butterworths, 1999).Google Scholar
Nolan, M. P. and Sedley, S., The Making and Remaking of the British Constitution (London: Blackstone Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Richardson, G. and Genn, H., Administrative Law and Government Action: The Courts and Alternative Mechanisms of Review (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Rishworth, P., Huscroft, G., Optican, S. and Maloney, R., The New Zealand Bill of Rights (Oxford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Stevens, R., Law and Politics: The House of Lords as a Judicial Body, 1800–1976 (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1979).Google Scholar
Stevens, R., The Independence of the Judiciary: The View from the Lord Chancellor's Office (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Stevens, R., The English Judges: Their Role in the Changing Constitution (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2005).Google Scholar
Tomkins, A., Public Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Turpin, C. and Tomkins, A., British Government and the Constitution (6th edn) (Cambridge University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vile, M. J. C., Constitutionalism and the Separation of Powers (1st edn) (Clarendon Press, 1967); (2nd edn) (Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1998).Google Scholar
Wade, H. W. R. and Forsyth, C. F., Administrative Law (9th edn) (Oxford University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Wade, H. W. R. and Forsyth, C. F., Administrative Law (10th edn) (Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Waldron, J.Law and Disagreement (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1999).CrossRef
Waldron, J. (ed.), Theories of Rights (Oxford University Press, 1984).
Wicks, E., The Evolution of a Constitution: Eight Key Moments in British Constitutional History (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2006).Google Scholar
Woodhouse, D., The Office of Lord Chancellor (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2001).Google Scholar
Woolf, , Lord, J. Jowell and Sueur, A., De Smith's Judicial Review (London: Sweet and Maxwell, 2007).Google Scholar
Young, A. L., Parliamentary Sovereignty and the Human Rights Act (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2009).Google Scholar
Zander, M., The Law-Making Process (Cambridge University Press, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziegler, K. S., Baranger, D. and Bradley, A., Constitutionalism and the Role of Parliaments (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2007).Google Scholar
Allan, J., ‘Bills of rights and judicial power: a liberal's quandary’ (1996) 16 OJLS 337.
Allan, J., ‘The Victorian Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities: Exegesis and Criticism’ (2006) 30 Melbourne University Law Review906.Google Scholar
Allan, T. R. S., ‘Human rights and judicial review: a critique of “due deference”’ (2006) 65 CLJ 671.
Allan, T. R. S., Review of R. Bellamy, Political Constitutionalism: A Republican Defence of the Constitutionality of Democracy (Cambridge University Press, 2007) (2008) 67(2) CLJ 423.Google Scholar
Amos, M., ‘R v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex p Anderson – ending the Home Secretary's sentencing role’ (2004) 67(1) MLR 108.
Barber, N. W., ‘Prelude to the separation of powers’ (2001) 60 CLJ 59.
Barendt, E., ‘Separation of powers and constitutional government’ [1995] PL 599.
Barendt, E., ‘Is there a United Kingdom constitution?’ (1997) 17 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barendt, E., ‘Free speech and abortion’ [2003] PL 580.
Bevir, M., ‘The Westminster model, governance and judicial reform’ (2008) 61 Parliamentary Affairs 559.
Bingham, , Lord, , ‘The rule of law’ (2007) 66 CLJ 67.
Bingham, T., ‘The European Convention on Human Rights: time to incorporate’ (1993) 109 LQR 390.
Bingham, T., ‘The old order changeth’ (2006) 122 LQR 211.
Blake, N., ‘Importing proportionality: clarification or confusion’ [2002] EHRLR 19.
Bogdanor, V., ‘Devolution: decentralisation or disintegration?’ (1999) 70 Political Quarterly185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyle, A., ‘Administrative justice, judicial review and the right to a fair hearing under the European Convention on Human Rights’ [1984] PL 89.
Bradley, A. W., ‘Judicial independence under attack’ [2003] PL 397.
Bradley, A. W., ‘Relations between executive, judiciary and Parliament: an evolving saga?’ [2008] PL 470.
Browne-Wilkinson, , Lord, , ‘The infiltration of a bill of rights’ [1992] PL 397.
Buxton, R., ‘The Human Rights Act and private law’ (2000) 116 LQR 48.
Clayton, R., ‘Regaining a sense of proportion: the Human Rights Act and the proportionality principle’ [2001] EHRLR 504.
Clayton, R., ‘The limits of what's possible: statutory construction under the Human Rights Act’ [2002] EHRLR 559.
Clayton, R., ‘Judicial deference and “democratic dialogue”: the legitimacy of judicial intervention under the HRA 1998’ [2004] PL 23.
Clayton, R., ‘Damage limitation: the courts and Human Rights Act damages’ [2005] PL 429.
Cohn, M., ‘Judicial review of non-statutory executive powers after Bancoult: a unified anxious model?’ [2009] PL 260.
,Cooke of Thorndon, Lord, ‘The Law Lords: an endangered heritage’ (2003) 119 LQR 49.
Cooke of Thorndon, Lord, ‘The myth of sovereignty’ (2007) 11 Otago Law Review377.Google Scholar
Cornes, R., ‘McGonnell v. United Kingdom, the Lord Chancellor and the Law Lords’ [2000] PL 166.
Craig, P., ‘Competing models of judicial review’ [1999] PL 428.
Smith, S., A., ‘The separation of powers in new dress’ (1966) 12 McGill Law Journal491.Google Scholar
Debeljak, J., ‘Rights protection without judicial supremacy: a review of the Canadian and British models of bills of rights’ (2002) 26 Melbourne University Law Review285.Google Scholar
Devlin, Lord, ‘Judges and law-makers’ (1976) 39 MLR 1.
Edwards, R., ‘Judicial deference under the Human Rights Act’ (2002) 65(6) MLR 859.
Elliott, M., ‘Parliamentary sovereignty and the new constitutional order: legislative freedom, political reality and convention’ (2002) 22 LS 340.
Elliott, M., ‘Parliamentary sovereignty under pressure’ (2004) 2 International Journal of Constitutional Law545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, M., ‘The sovereignty of Parliament, the hunting ban and the Parliament Acts’ (2006) 65 CLJ 1.
Elliott, M. and Perreau-Saussine, A., ‘Pyrrhic public law: Bancoult and the sources, status and content of common law limitations on prerogative power’ [2009] PL 697.
Ewing, K. D., ‘The Human Rights Act and parliamentary democracy’ (1999) 62 MLR 79.
Ewing, K. D., ‘A theory of democratic adjudication: towards a representative, accountable and independent judiciary’ (2000) 38 Alberta Law Review 708.
Ewing, K. D., ‘The futility of the Human Rights Act’ [2004] PL 829.
Ewing, K. D. and Gearty, C. A., ‘Rocky foundations for Labour's new rights’ [1997] EHRLR 146.
Ewing, K. D. and Tham, J.-C., ‘The continuing futility of the Human Rights Act’ [2008] PL 668.
Feldman, D., ‘Parliamentary scrutiny of legislation and human rights’ [2002] PL 32.
Feldman, D., ‘Human rights, terrorism and assessments of risk: the roles of judges and politicians’ [2006] PL 364.
Fenwick, H., ‘The Anti-Terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001: a proportionate response to 11 September?’ (2002) 65 MLR 724.
Fenwick, H. and Phillipson, G., ‘confidence and privacy: a re-examination’ (1996) 55 CLJ 447.
Fenwick, H. and Fenwick, H., ‘Breach of confidence as a privacy remedy in the Human Rights Act era’ (2000) 63 MLR 660.
Fenwick, H. and G. Phillipson, ‘Direct action, Convention values and the Human Rights Act’ (2001) 21 LS 535.
Fordham, M., ‘Reparation for maladministration: public law's final frontier’ [2003] Judicial Review104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fordham, M., ‘Common law illegality of ousting judicial review’ [2004] JR 86.
Fordham, M., ‘Wednesbury’ [2007] JR 266.
Forsyth, C., ‘Of fig leaves and fairy tales: the ultra vires doctrine, the sovereignty of Parliament and judicial review’ (1996) 55 CLJ 122.
Fredman, S., ‘From deference to democracy: the role of equality under the Human Rights Act 1998’ (2006) 122 LQR 53.
Fuller, L., ‘The forms and limits of adjudication’ (1978–9) 92 Harvard Law Review353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ganz, G., ‘Allocation of decision-making functions’ (part I) [1972] PL 215.
Ganz, G., ‘Allocation of decision-making functions’ (part II) [1972] PL 299.
Gearty, C., ‘Reconciling parliamentary democracy and human rights’ (2002) 118 LQR 248.
Gearty, C., ‘Revisiting section 3 of the Human Rights Act’ (2003) 119 LQR 551.
Greene, W., ‘Law and progress’ (1944) 94 Law Journal349.Google Scholar
Griffith, J. A. G., ‘The political constitution’ (1979) 42 MLR 1.
Griffith, J. A. G., ‘The brave new world of Sir John Laws’ (2000) 63 MLR 159, 170.
Hazell, R., ‘The continuing dynamism of constitutional reform’ (2007) 60 Parliamentary Affairs3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hickman, T., ‘Constitutional dialogue, constitutional theories and the Human Rights Act’ [2005] PL 306.
Hickman, T., ‘The courts and politics after the Human Rights Act: a comment’ [2008] PL 84.
Hickman, T., ‘The substance and structure of proportionality’ [2008] PL 194.
Hiebert, J., ‘Interpreting a bill of rights: the importance of legislative rights review’ (2005) 35 British Journal of Political Science235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hiebert, J., ‘Parliamentary bills of rights: an alternative model?’ (2006) 69 MLR 7.
Hoffmann, , Lord, , ‘Human rights and the House of Lords’ (1999) 62(2) MLR 159.
Hoffmann, , Lord, , ‘The COMBAR Lecture 2001: Separation of Powers’ [2002] JR 137.
Hoffmann, , ‘The universality of human rights’ (2009) 125 LQR 416.
Hogg, P. and Bushell, A., ‘The Charter dialogue between courts and legislatures (or perhaps the Charter of Rights isn't such a bad thing after all)’ (1997) 35 Osgoode Hall Law Journal75.Google Scholar
Hood Phillips, O., ‘A constitutional myth: separation of powers’ (1977) 93 LQR 11.
Hope, , Lord, , ‘A phoenix from the ashes? Accommodating a new Supreme Court’ (2005) 121 LQR 253.
Hope, Lord ‘Voices from the past – the Law Lords’ contribution to the legislative process' (2007) 123 LQR 547.
Hughes, K., ‘Horizontal privacy’ (2009) 125 LQR 244.
Hunt, M., ‘The “horizontal effect” of the Human Rights Act’ [1998] PL 423.
Huscroft, G., ‘The trouble with living tree interpretation’ (2006) 25 University of Queensland Law Journal3.Google Scholar
Jaconelli, J., ‘Do constitutional conventions bind?’ (2005) 64 CLJ 149.
Jenkins, D., ‘Common law declarations of unconstitutionality’ (2009) 7 International Journal of Constitutional Law183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jowell, J., ‘Beyond the rule of law: towards constitutional judicial review’ [2000] PL 671.
Jowell, J., ‘Judicial deference: servility, civility or institutional capacity?’ [2003] PL 592.
Jowell, J., ‘Parliamentary sovereignty under the new constitutional hypothesis’ [2006] PL 562.
Juss, S. S., ‘Constitutionalising rights without a constitution: the British experience under Article 6 of the Human Rights Act 1998’ (2006) 27 Stat LR 29.
Kavanagh, A., ‘Statutory interpretation and human rights after Anderson: a more contextual approach’ [2004] PL 537.
Kavanagh, A., ‘The elusive divide between interpretation and legislation under the Human Rights Act 1998’ (2004) 24(2) OJLS 259.
Kavanagh, A., ‘Unlocking the Human Rights Act: the “radical” approach to section 3(1) revisited’ [2005] EHRLR 259.
Kavanagh, A., ‘The role of parliamentary intention in adjudication under the Human Rights Act 1998’ (2006) 26 OJLS 179.
King, J. A., ‘The justiciability of resource allocation’ (2007) 70 MLR 197.
King, J. A., ‘Institutional approaches to judicial restraint’ (2008) 28 OJLS 409.
King, J. A., ‘The pervasiveness of polycentricity’ [2008] PL 101.
Klug, F., ‘The Human Rights Act – a “third way” or “third wave” bill of rights’ [2001] EHRLR 361.
Klug, F., ‘Judicial deference under the Human Rights Act’ [2003] EHRLR 125.
Klug, F., ‘A bill of rights: do we need one, or do we already have one?’ [2007] PL 701.
Klug, F. and Wildbore, H., ‘Breaking new ground: the Joint Committee on Human Rights and the role of Parliament in human rights compliance’ [2007] EHRLR 231.
Knight, C. J. S., ‘Monkeying around with free speech’ (2008) 124 LQR 557.
Knight, C. J. S., ‘Bi-polar sovereignty restated’ (2009) 68 CLJ 361.
Laws, Sir J., ‘Law and democracy’ [1995] PL 72.
Sueur, A., ‘The judicial review debate: from partnership to friction’ (1996) 31 Government and Opposition8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sueur, A., ‘New Labour's next (surprisingly quick) steps in constitutional reform’ [2003] PL 368.
Sueur, A., ‘Three strikes and it's out: The UK government's strategy to oust judicial review from immigration and asylum decision making’ [2004] PL 225.
Sueur, A., ‘The rise and ruin of unreasonableness?’ [2005] JR 32.
Leigh, I., ‘Taking rights proportionately: judicial review, the Human Rights Act and Strasbourg’ [2002] PL 265.
Lester, Lord, ‘English judges as law makers’ [1993] PL 269.
Lester, Lord, ‘Parliamentary scrutiny of legislation under the Human Rights Act 1998’ [2002] EHRLR 432.
Lester, Lord, ‘Beyond the powers of Parliament’ [2004] JR 95.
Lester, Lord, ‘The utility of the Human Rights Act: a reply to Keith Ewing’ [2005] PL 249.
Lewis, J., ‘The European ceiling on rights’ [2007] PL 720.
Lewis, J., ‘In Re P and others: an exception to the “no more, certainly no less” rule’ [2009] PL 43.
Loveland, I., ‘The war against the judges’ (1997) 68 Political Quarterly162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loveland, I., ‘Making it up as they go along? The Court of Appeal on same-sex spouses and succession rights to tenancies’ [2003] PL 222.
Mackay, Lord, ‘Can judges change the law?’ Maccabaean Lecture (1987) LXXIII Proceedings of the British Academy 285.
Manfredi, C. P. and Kelly, J. B., ‘Six degrees of dialogue: a response to Hogg and Bushell’ (1999) 37 Osgoode Hall Law Journal513.Google Scholar
Martens, Judge S. K., ‘Incorporating the European Convention: the role of the judiciary’ [1998] EHRLR 5.
Mason, Sir A., ‘Legislative and judicial law-making: can we locate an identifiable boundary?’ [2004] Adelaide Law Review15.Google Scholar
Masterman, R., ‘Section 2(1) of the Human Rights Act 1998: binding domestic courts to Strasbourg?’ [2004] PL 725.
Masterman, R., ‘Taking the Strasbourg jurisprudence into account: developing a “municipal law of human rights” under the Human Rights Act’ (2005) 54 ICLQ 907.
Masterman, R., ‘Juridification, sovereignty and separation of powers’ (2009) 62 Parliamentary Affairs499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, P., ‘The dog in the night-time’ [2000] Jersey Law Review164.Google Scholar
McCrudden, C., ‘A common law of human rights? Transnational judicial conversations on constitutional rights’ (2000) 20 OJLS 499.
Mullen, T., ‘Reflections on Jackson v. Attorney-General: questioning sovereignty’ (2007) 27 LS 1.
Nicol, D., ‘Are Convention rights a no-go zone for Parliament?’ [2002] PL 438.
Nicol, D., ‘The Human Rights Act and the politicians’ (2004) 24 LS 451.
Nicol, D., ‘Statutory interpretation and human rights after Anderson’ [2004] PL 274.
Nicol, D., ‘Law and politics after the Human Rights Act’ [2006] PL 722.
O'Cinneide, C., ‘Democracy and rights: new directions in the Human Rights era’ [2004] 57 Current Legal Problems 175.
Oliver, D., ‘Is the ultra vires rule the basis of judicial review?’ [1987] PL 543.
Oliver, D., ‘Constitutionalism and the abolition of the office of Lord Chancellor’ (2004) 57 Parliamentary Affairs754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pannick, D., ‘Principles of interpretation of Convention rights under the Human Rights Act and the discretionary area of judgment’ [1998] PL 545.
Phillipson, G., ‘The Human Rights Act, “horizontal effect” and the common law: a bang or a whimper?’ (1999) 62 MLR 824.
Phillipson, G., ‘Judicial reasoning in breach of confidence cases under the Human Rights Act: not taking privacy seriously?’ [2003] EHRLR (Special issue: Privacy) 54.
Phillipson, G., ‘(Mis-)Reading section 3 of the Human Rights Act’ (2003) 119 LQR 183.
Phillipson, G., ‘Deference, discretion and democracy in the Human Rights Act era’ (2007) 60 Current Legal Problems40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poole, T., ‘Tilting at windmills? Truth and illusion in “the political constitution”’ (2007) 70 MLR 250.
Poole, T., ‘The reformation of English administrative law’ (2009) 68 CLJ 142.
Prince, S., ‘Law and politics: upsetting the judicial apple-cart’ (2004) 57 Parliamentary Affairs288, 293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawlings, R., ‘Review, revenge and retreat’ (2005) 68 MLR 378.
Raz, J., ‘The rule of law and its virtue’ (1977) 93 LQR 195.
Reid, Lord, ‘The judge as law maker’ (1972–3) 12 Journal of the Society of the Public Teachers of Law22.Google Scholar
Rivers, J., ‘Proportionality and variable intensity of review’ (2006) 65 CLJ 174.
Roach, K., ‘Constitutional and common law dialogues between the Supreme Court and Canadian legislatures’ (2001) 80 Canadian Bar Review481.Google Scholar
Rogers, H., and Tomlinson, H., ‘Privacy and expression: Convention rights and interim injunctions’ [2003] EHRLR 37.
Russell, M., and Cornes, R., ‘The Royal Commission on Reform of the House of Lords: A House for the future?’ (2001) 64(1) MLR 82.
Saunders, C., ‘Separation of powers and the judicial branch’ [2006] JR 337.
Sedley, Sir S., ‘The sound of silence: constitutional law without a constitution’ (1994) 110 LQR 270.
Sedley, LJ, ‘Human rights: a twenty-first century agenda’ [1995] PL 386.
Sedley, S., ‘Above it all16 London Review of Books7 (7 April 1994).Google Scholar
Sherlock, A., ‘A new devolution settlement for Wales’ (2008) 14 EPL 297.
Shute, S., ‘Punishing murderers: release procedures and the “tariff”, 1953–2004’ (2004) Crim LR 873.
Smillie, J. A., ‘“Fundamental” rights, parliamentary supremacy and the New Zealand Court of Appeal’ (1995) 111 LQR 209.
Stevens, R., ‘A loss of innocence?: judicial independence and the separation of powers’ (1999) 19(3) OJLS 366.
Stevens, R., ‘The Act of Settlement and the questionable history of judicial independence’ (2001) 1(2) Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, R., ‘Reform in haste and repent at leisure: lolanthe, the Lord High Executioner and Brave New World’ (2004) 24 LS 1.
Steyn, J., ‘Does legal formalism hold sway in England?’ (1996) 49 Current Legal Problems43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steyn, Lord, ‘The weakest and least dangerous department of government’ [1997] PL 84, 86.
Steyn, Lord, ‘The new legal landscape’ [2000] EHRLR 549.
Steyn, Lord, ‘The case for a Supreme Court’ (2002) 118 LQR 382.
Steyn, Lord, ‘Democracy through law’ [2002] EHRLR 725.
Steyn, Lord, ‘Guantanamo Bay: the legal black hole’ (2004) 53 ICLQ 1.
Steyn, Lord, ‘Deference: a tangled story’ [2005] PL 346.
Steyn, Lord, ‘Democracy, the rule of law and the role of the judges’ [2006] EHRLR 243.
Taggart, M., ‘Proportionality, deference, Wednesbury’ [2008] NZLR 423.
Tierney, S., ‘Devolution issues and s.2(1) of the Human Rights Act 1998’ [2000] EHRLR 380.
Tierney, S., ‘Determining the state of exception: what role for Parliament and the courts?’ (2005) 68 MLR 668.
Tomkins, A., ‘In defence of the political constitution’ (2002) 22 OJLS 157.
Tomkins, A., ‘Legislating against terror: The Anti-Terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001’ [2002] PL 205.
Tomkins, A., ‘Readings of A v. Secretary of State for the Home Department’ [2005] PL 259.
Tomkins, A., ‘The rule of law in Blair's Britain’ (2007) 26 University of Queensland Law Journal255.Google Scholar
Tremblay, L. B., ‘The legitimacy of judicial review: the limits of dialogue between courts and legislatures’ (2005) 3 International Journal of Constitutional Law617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trench, A., ‘The Government of Wales Act 2006: the next steps on devolution for Wales’ [2006] PL 687.
Wade, H. W. R., ‘The basis of legal sovereignty’ (1955) 13 CLJ 172.
Wade, H. W. R., ‘Horizons of horizontality’ (2000) 116 LQR 217.
Waldron, J., ‘A rights-based critique of constitutional rights’ (1993) 13(1) OJLS 18.
Waldron, J., ‘The core of the case against Judicial Review’ (2006) 115 Yale Law Journal1346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webber, J., ‘Supreme courts, independence and democratic agency’ (2004) 24 LS 55.
Windlesham, Lord, ‘The Constitutional Reform Act 2005: ministers, judges and constitutional change: part I’ [2005] PL 806.
Windlesham, Lord, ‘The Constitutional Reform Act 2005: the politics of constitutional reform: part II’ [2006] PL 35.
Woodhouse, D., ‘The office of Lord Chancellor: time to abandon the judicial role – the rest will follow’ (2002) 22(1) LS 128.
Woodhouse, D., ‘The constitutional and political implications of a United Kingdom Supreme Court’ (2004) 24 LS 134.
Woodhouse, D., ‘The Constitutional Reform Act 2005 – defending judicial independence the English way’ (2007) 5 International Journal of Constitutional Law153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woolf, Lord, ‘Droit public – English style’ [1995] PL 57.
Woolf, Lord, ‘The rule of law and a change in the constitution’ (2004) 63 CLJ 317.
Young, A., ‘Ghaidan v. Godin-Mendoza: avoiding the deference trap’ [2005] PL 23.
Young, A., ‘Hunting sovereignty: Jackson v. Attorney-General’ [2006] PL 187.
Young, A., ‘In defence of due deference’ (2009) 72 MLR 554.
,Department for Constitutional Affairs, A New Way of Appointing Judges (CP 10/03, July 2003).
,Department for Constitutional Affairs, A Supreme Court for the United Kingdom (CP 11/03, July 2003).
,Department for Constitutional Affairs, Reforming the Office of Lord Chancellor (CP 13/03, September 2003).
,Department for Constitutional Affairs, ‘The Lord Chancellor's Judiciary-Related Functions’ (January 2004), available at: www.dca.gov.uk/consult/lcoffice/judiciary.htm#part5.
,Department for Constitutional AffairsReview of the Implementation of the Human Rights Act (July 2006).
Goold, B. L. Lazarus, Voting Rights of Convicted Prisoners Detained within the United Kingdom (CP 29/06, December 2006).
Goold, B., L. Lazarus and Swiney, G., Public Protection, Proportionality and the Search for Balance (Ministry of Justice Research Series 10/07), September 2007.
,Government's Response to the House of Lords Select Committee on the Constitution's Report, Relations between the Executive, the Judiciary and Parliament (Cm. 7223), October 2007.
,Government White Paper, The House of Lords – Completing the Reform (Cmd. 5291), (2001).
,House of Commons Constitutional Affairs Committee, Constitutional Role of the Attorney General (HC 306), 19 July 2007.
,House of Lords Select Committee on the Constitution, Legislative and Regulatory Reform Bill (HL 194), 8 June 2006.
,House of Lords Select Committee on the Constitution, Relations between the Executive, the Judiciary and Parliament (HL 151), 26 July 2007.
,Joint Committee on Human Rights, Counter Terrorism Policy and Human Rights (HL 50/HC 199), 7 February 2008.
,Joint Committee on Human Rights, Monitoring the Government's Response to Court Judgments finding Breaches of Human Rights (HL 128/HC 728), 2006–7.
,Joint Committee on Human Rights, Counter Terrorism Policy and Human Rights (HL 50/HC 199), 7 February 2008.
,Joint Committee on Parliamentary Privilege, First Report of 1998–1999 (HL 43-I; HC 214-I).
,Labour Party, Rights Brought Home: The Human Rights Bill (Cm. 3782, 1997).
,Ministry of Justice, The Governance of Britain (Cm. 7170), July 2007.
,Ministry of Justice, Voting Rights of Convicted Prisoners Detained within the United Kingdom (CP 6/09, April 2009).
,Public Administration Committee, Fifth Report, The Second Chamber: Continuing the Reform (HC 494-I, 14 February 2002).
,Public Administration Committee, Taming the Prerogative: Strengthening Ministerial Accountability to Parliament (HC 422).
,Royal Commission on Reform of the House of Lords, A House for the Future (Cm. 4534, 2000).
,Select Committee on the Constitution, Waging War: Parliament's Role and Responsibility (HL 236-I, 2006).

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Select bibliography
  • Roger Masterman, University of Durham
  • Book: The Separation of Powers in the Contemporary Constitution
  • Online publication: 10 January 2011
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511933820.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Select bibliography
  • Roger Masterman, University of Durham
  • Book: The Separation of Powers in the Contemporary Constitution
  • Online publication: 10 January 2011
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511933820.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Select bibliography
  • Roger Masterman, University of Durham
  • Book: The Separation of Powers in the Contemporary Constitution
  • Online publication: 10 January 2011
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511933820.011
Available formats
×