Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Dedication
- Acknowledgements
- Preface
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 “I have shot mine arrow o’er the house, / And hurt my brother”: Death and Redemption in Hamlet and Arrow
- Chapter 2 Of Guise and Gals: Wonder Woman and Shakespearean Cross- Dressing
- Chapter 3 Tonight at the Improv: Comedians Slay! Two Drink Minimum
- Postscript: Comic Books and Literary Values
- Index
Postscript: Comic Books and Literary Values
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 January 2021
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Dedication
- Acknowledgements
- Preface
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 “I have shot mine arrow o’er the house, / And hurt my brother”: Death and Redemption in Hamlet and Arrow
- Chapter 2 Of Guise and Gals: Wonder Woman and Shakespearean Cross- Dressing
- Chapter 3 Tonight at the Improv: Comedians Slay! Two Drink Minimum
- Postscript: Comic Books and Literary Values
- Index
Summary
Postscripts in literary studies always strike me as odd. They tend to summarize and, paradoxically, to enjoin fellow scholars to continue a particular line of inquiry. That is especially true of this short study, in which I have argued that the correspondences I am making are unique to my interests and lifeexperiences. Initially, that may seem pointlessly introspective; however, anecdotal conversations with students and fellow scholars have convinced me that what I am doing here is more than just engaging in Looney Tunes- like flights of fancy. It is entirely normal to catalogue literary experiences, to align certain texts and characters with each other.
For this writer, the process begins with a recognition of superficial plot points. In the case of Arrow and Hamlet, my argument is that both are errand boys with “things to do,” but their seemingly straightforward tasks are complicated by their diseased wits and unreliable moral compasses. Memories, both heroes come to understand, don't always conform with reality. This insight leads to a series of philosophical inquiries concerning the nature of the self. If a person is changed by events, then it follows that the person who commits an act, whether heroic or heinous, no longer exists in the same state afterwards. Arrow and Hamlet, thus, find themselves continuously missing the mark, perpetually chasing down ghosts of the actual. In the case of Wonder Woman and Fidele, I have argued that both have a fluid understanding of gender. If biology is not a marker that defines sexual preference, to what extent are we living our own lives; to what extent are we merely playing out our socially appointed roles, and can we, and should we, selfliberate from the inherited habits and habiliments of our society? In the case of Iago and Deadpool, we see a similar, albeit darker, philosophical impulse: that core beliefs filter life experience. As Iago and Deadpool have no core beliefs, they have no meaningful experiences, and no way to connect with their communities. As I have argued, we often get a sense that these characters can step out of their worlds and into ours.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Shakespeare and Superheroes , pp. 77 - 92Publisher: Amsterdam University PressPrint publication year: 2018