There is a passage in Antony and Cleopatra (4.16) where confused composition has been suspected. In the Folio, Cleopatra greets her mortally wounded lover:

The fact that twenty lines later (3035-6) Cleopatra is still urging her women to draw Antony up, as well as the repetition of Antony's 'I am dying Egypt, dying' (3022 and 3050), have caused some division among editors and scholars. John Dover Wilson sought to explain the confusion by arguing that Shakespeare's manuscript (from which most scholars think the play was set), was marked here for a cut either by the author or by the book-holder in advance of preparing the promptbook. On the other hand, Greg (who found Wilson's explanation of the causes of the confusion 'not very clear') took the apparent difficulty as a confirmation that the play was set from foul papers. He also noted the unusual spelling in the passage of Antony's name, which here almost uniquely appears without the medial h. While aware that there may be something odd about this passage, most recent editors reject theories about a false start and might well agree with Emrys Jones that since 'this is a play uncommonly concerned to render - in some of its scenes, at least - the feel of life as it is lived and especially its tendency to untidiness and anti-climax', if the passage 'seems confused and repetitive, that may be exactly what Shakespeare intended'.