Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-vt8vv Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-08-07T02:59:37.000Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Was there a Typical Elizabethan Stage?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2007

Get access

Summary

When Queen Elizabeth I visited Cambridge University in the year of Shakespeare’s birth, 1564, Plautus’ Aulularia was produced for her entertainment. The presentation of a Latin play before the Queen should not be, ordinarily, of particular interest; but the manner of production, in this instance, bears examination. Roman comedy, or an adaptation of it, generally calls for the representation of the houses of the characters on the stage; one might, therefore, expect the authorities at King’s College, where Aulularia was given, to exert themselves in providing these houses for the actors. Such was common custom, if we are to judge from college account books and eyewitness reports of the period. The producers at King’s however, did not act in the conventional way; instead of presenting the play, as tradition dictated, in the Hall (which proved to be inadequate for the occasion) they set it in the Chapel. A stage was built “in the body of the Church containing the breadth of the church from one side to the other, that the Chappeles might serve as houses. In the length it ran two of the lower Chapels full, with pillars on a side.” It may be noted that the houses were not on the stage itself, as we might think necessary and proper; they were off the stage right and left, and facing it. Moreover, there was obviously no attempt at providing ‘Roman’ or separate structures for the characters in the comedy. Perhaps from reasons of economy the college authorities acted as they did; but it does not seem to have crossed anyone’s mind that the production was peculiar. The producers made use, after all, of whatever theatre and apparatus might be available. It is, therefore, perhaps likely that other producers of the period, especially the professional actors, may have been adaptable and flexible in a way that is difficult for us to understand.

Type
Chapter
Information
Shakespeare Survey , pp. 15 - 21
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1959

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×