Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-tdptf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-06T15:39:17.331Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Fatigue Limit-State Design

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 September 2009

Jeom Kee Paik
Affiliation:
Pusan National University, Korea
Get access

Summary

Introduction

As we discussed in Chapters 3 and 5, limit states are classified into four categories: serviceability limit states (SLS), ultimate limit states (ULS), fatigue limit states (FLS), and accidental limit states (ALS). This chapter presents FLS design principles and criteria together with selected engineering practices applicable for the structure of ship-shaped offshore units.

Under the action of repeated loading, fatigue cracks may in time be initiated in the stress concentration areas of ship-shaped offshore structures, and indeed have been reported by Hoogeland et al. (2003) and Newport et al. (2004), among others. In general, the fatigue damage at a crack initiation site is affected by many factors, such as material properties (e.g., elastic modulus, ultimate tensile stress); high local stresses (e.g., stress concentration, residual stresses); size of components; nature of stress variation (e.g., stress variation during the loading and off-take cycles, number of wave-induced stress range cycles); and environmental and operational factors including corrosion and performance of coatings. Potential flaws (e.g., poor materials, porosity, slag inclusions, undercuts, lack of fusion, incomplete weld root penetration) and misalignments can also significantly increase stress concentration and initial defects at welds.

To achieve greater fatigue durability in a structure, therefore, stress concentrations, flaws, and structural degradation, including corrosion and fatigue effects, must either be avoided or minimized or, more commonly, their levels and effects either in design, construction, and/or service must be monitored and effectively controlled to acceptable levels.

Type
Chapter
Information
Ship-Shaped Offshore Installations
Design, Building, and Operation
, pp. 217 - 256
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ABS (2004). Guide for building and classing floating production installations. American Bureau of Shipping, Houston, April.
API RP 2FPS (2001). Recommended practice for planning, designing, and constructing floating production systems. (Recommended Practices, 2FPS), American Petroleum Institute.
Bergan, P. G., and Lotsberg, I. (2004). “Advances in fatigue assessment of FPSOs.” Proceedings of International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, OMAE-FPSO'04-0012, Houston, August 30–September 2.Google Scholar
Broek, D. (1986). Elementary engineering fracture mechanics. The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BS 5400 (1980). Part 10: Code of practice for fatigue design. British Standard, UK.
Bultema, S., Boom, H., and Krekel, M. (2000). FPSO integrity: JIP on FPSO fatigue loads. Offshore Technology Conference, OTC 12142, Houston, May.Google Scholar
BV (2004). Hull structure of production, storage, and offloading surface units. (Rule Notes, No. 497), Bureau Veritas, Paris, October.
DNV (1998). Fatigue assessment of ship structures. (Classification Notes, No. 30.7), Det Norske Veritas, Oslo.
DNV (2002). Structural Design of Offshore Units (WSD Method). (Offshore Standards, DNV-OS-C201), Det Norske Veritas, Oslo.
DNV (2006). Fatigue methodology for offshore ships. (Recommended Practices, DNV-RP-C206), Det Norske Veritas, Oslo.
Doerk, O., Fricke, W., and Weissenborn, C. (2003). “Comparison of different calculation methods for structural stresses at welded joints.” International Journal of Fatigue, 25: 359–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dong, P., Hong, J. K., and Cao, C. (2001). A mesh-insensitive structural stress procedure for fatigue evaluation of welded structures. (IIW Document, No. XIII-1902–01), International Institute of Welding, USA.Google Scholar
Francois, M., Mo, O., Fricke, W., Mitchell, K., and Healy, B. (2000). FPSO integrity: Comparative study of fatigue analysis methods. Offshore Technology Conference, OTC 12148, Houston, May.Google Scholar
Fricke, W., Cui, W., Kierkegaard, H., Kihl, D., Koval, M., Mikkola, T., Parmentier, G., Toyosada, M., and Yoon, J. H. (2002). “Comparative fatigue strength assessment of a structural detail in a containership using various approaches of classification societies.” Marine Structures, 15: 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fricke, W., and Säbel, A. (2000). Hot spot stress analysis of five structural details and recommendations for modeling, stress evaluation and design S–N curve. (Report No. FF99.188), Germanischer Lloyd, Germany.Google Scholar
Gurney, T. R. (1979). Fatigue of Welded Structures. 2nd ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Holmes, P., Tickell, R. G., and Burrows, R. (1978). Prediction of long term wave loading on offshore structures. (Liverpool University Report, Nos. OT7823 and OT 7824 for OSFLAG Project 5), University of Liverpool, UK.Google Scholar
Hoogeland, M. G., Nat, C. G. J. M., and Kaminski, M. L. (2003). FPSO fatigue assessment: Feedback from in-service inspections. Offshore Technology Conference, OTC 15064, Houston, May.Google Scholar
HSE (1997). A review of monohull FSUs and FPSUs. (Offshore Technology Report, OTO 1997/800), Health and Safety Executive, UK.
HSE (1999). Background to new fatigue guidance for steel joints and connections in offshore structures. (Offshore Technology Report, OTH 1992/390), Health and Safety Executive, UK.
HSE (2001). Comparison of fatigue provisions in codes and standards. (Offshore Technology Report, OTO 2001/083), Health and Safety Executive, UK.
HSE (2004). Review of low cycle fatigue resistance. (Research Report, No. 207), Health and Safety Executive, UK.
IIW (1996). Fatigue design of welded joints and components. Recommendations of IIW Joint Working Group XIII-1539–96/XV-845–96, Hobbacher, A., ed., International Institute of Welding, Abington, UK: Abington Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ISO 2394 (1998). General principles on reliability for structures. International Standard, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, June.
Kang, S. W., Kim, W. S., and Paik, Y. M. (2002). “Fatigue strength of fillet welded steel structure under out-of-plane bending.” Proceedings of International Welding/Joining Conference, Korea.Google Scholar
Kang, S. W., and Kim, W. S. (2003). “A proposed S–N curve for welded ship structure.” Welding Journal, 82(7): 161–169.Google Scholar
Lotsberg, I. (1998). FPSO – Fatigue capacity, hot spot stress and S–N data: Background and planning. (DNV Report, No. 98-3465), Det Norske Veritas, Oslo, December.Google Scholar
Lotsberg, I. (2000). Background and status of the FPSO fatigue capacity JIP. Offshore Technology Conference, OTC 12144, Houston, May.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lotsberg, I. (2004). “Fatigue design of welded pipe penetrations in plated structures.” Marine Structures, 17: 29–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lotsberg, I. (2005). “Background for revision of DNV-RP-C203 fatigue analysis of offshore steel structures.” Proceedings of OMAE2005, OMAE2005-67549, The 24th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Artic Engineering (OMAE 2005), Halkidiki, Greece, June 12–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lotsberg, I. (2006). “Fatigue design of plated structures using finite element analysis.” Ships and Offshore Structures, 1(1): 45–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lotsberg, I., and Landet, E. (2005). “Fatigue capacity of side longitudinals in floating structures.” Marine Structures, 18: 25–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lotsberg, I., and Sigurdsson, G. (2004). “Hot spot S–N curve for fatigue analysis of plated structures.” Proceedings of OMAE–FPSO 2004 – OMAE Specialty Symposium on FPSO Integrity (OMAE–FPSO'04-0014), Houston, August 30–September 2.Google Scholar
Newport, A., Basu, R., and Peden, A. (2004). “Structural modifications to the FPSO Kuito cargo tanks.” Proceedings of OMAE–FPSO 2004 – OMAE Specialty Symposium on FPSO Integrity, OMAE–FPSO'04-0085, Houston, August 30–September 2.Google Scholar
Niemi, E. (2001). Structural stress approach to fatigue analysis of welded components–Designer's guide. (IIW Document, No. XV-1090-01), International Institute of Welding, USA.Google Scholar
Oh, M. H., Sim, W. S., and Shin, H. S. (2003). Fatigue analysis of Kizomba ‘A’ FPSO using direct calculation based on FMS. Offshore Technology Conference, OTC 15066, Houston, May.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paik, J. K., and Hughes, O. F. (2006). “Ship structures.” In Computational analysis of complex structures.Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers.Google Scholar
Paik, J. K., and Thayamballi, A. K. (2003). Ultimate limit state design of steel-plated structures. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Paik, J. K., Wang, G., Thayamballi, A. K., Lee, J. M., and Park, Y. I. (2003). “Time-variant risk assessment of aging ships accounting for general/pit corrosion, fatigue cracking, and local denting damage.” SNAME Transactions, 111: 159–197.Google Scholar
Petinov, S. V., Kim, W. S., and Paik, Y. M. (2006). “Assessment of fatigue strength of weld root in ship structure: An approximate procedure.” Ships and Offshore Structures, 1(1): 55–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storsul, R., Landet, E., and Lotsberg, I. (2004a). “Convergence analysis for welded details in ship-shaped structures.” Proceedings of OMAEFPSO 2004 – OMAE Specialty Symposium on FPSO Integrity, OMAE-FPSO'04-0016, Houston, August 30–September 2.Google Scholar
Storsul, R., Landet, E., and Lotsberg, I. (2004b). “Calculated and measured stress at welded connections between side longitudinals and transverse frames in ship-shaped structures.” Proceedings of OMAE–FPSO 2004 – OMAE Specialty Symposium on FPSO Integrity, OMAE–FPSO'04-0017, Houston, August 30–September 2.Google Scholar
Tam, G., and Wu, J. F. (2005). A rational approach for the evaluation of fatigue strength of FPSO structures. American Bureau of Shipping, Houston.Google Scholar
Urm, H. S., Yoo, I. S., Heo, J. H., Kim, S. C., and Lotsberg, I. (2004). “Low cycle fatigue strength assessment for ship structures.” Proceedings of the 9th Symposium on Practical Design of Ships and Other Floating Structures (PRADS 2004), Luebeck-Travemuende, Germany, September, pp. 774–781.Google Scholar
Wang, X., and Cheng, Z. (2003). “Sensitivity of fatigue assessment to the use of different reference S–N curves.” Proceedings of 22nd International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering (OMAE 2003), OMAE 2003-37238, Cancun, Mexico, June 13–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, X., Cheng, Z., Wirsching, P., and Sun, H. (2005). “Fatigue design factors and safety level implied in fatigue design of offshore structures.” Proceedings of 24th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering (OMAE 2005), OMAE 2005-67488, Halkidiki, Greece, June 12–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×