Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- How to Use This Book
- 1 Overview of Ship-Shaped Offshore Installations
- 2 Front-End Engineering
- 3 Design Principles, Criteria, and Regulations
- 4 Environmental Phenomena and Application to Design
- 5 Serviceability Limit-State Design
- 6 Ultimate Limit-State Design
- 7 Fatigue Limit-State Design
- 8 Accidental Limit-State Design
- 9 Topsides, Mooring, and Export Facilities Design
- 10 Corrosion Assessment and Management
- 11 Inspection and Maintenance
- 12 Tanker Conversion and Decommissioning
- 13 Risk Assessment and Management
- Appendix 1 Terms and Definitions
- Appendix 2 Scale Definitions of Winds, Waves, and Swells
- Appendix 3 Probability of Sea States at Various Ocean Regions
- Appendix 4 Scaling Laws for Physical Model Testing
- Appendix 5 Wind-Tunnel Test Requirements
- Appendix 6 List of Selected Industry Standards
- Index
- References
6 - Ultimate Limit-State Design
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 September 2009
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- How to Use This Book
- 1 Overview of Ship-Shaped Offshore Installations
- 2 Front-End Engineering
- 3 Design Principles, Criteria, and Regulations
- 4 Environmental Phenomena and Application to Design
- 5 Serviceability Limit-State Design
- 6 Ultimate Limit-State Design
- 7 Fatigue Limit-State Design
- 8 Accidental Limit-State Design
- 9 Topsides, Mooring, and Export Facilities Design
- 10 Corrosion Assessment and Management
- 11 Inspection and Maintenance
- 12 Tanker Conversion and Decommissioning
- 13 Risk Assessment and Management
- Appendix 1 Terms and Definitions
- Appendix 2 Scale Definitions of Winds, Waves, and Swells
- Appendix 3 Probability of Sea States at Various Ocean Regions
- Appendix 4 Scaling Laws for Physical Model Testing
- Appendix 5 Wind-Tunnel Test Requirements
- Appendix 6 List of Selected Industry Standards
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Ship-Shaped Offshore InstallationsDesign, Building, and Operation, pp. 148 - 216Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2007
References
ALPS/GENERAL (2006). A computer program for progressive collapse analysis of general types of plated structures. Proteus Engineering, Stevensville, MD.
ALPS/HULL (2006). A computer program for progressive collapse analysis of ship hulls.Proteus Engineering, Stevensville, MD (http://www.proteusengineering.com).
ALPS/SPINE (2006). A computer program for elastic-plastic large deflection analysis of stiffened plate structures by the incremental energy method. Proteus Engineering, Stevensville, MD (http://www.proteusengineering.com).
ALPS/ULSAP (2006). A computer program for ultimate limit-state assessment of stiffened panels. Proteus Engineering, Stevensville, MD (http://www.proteusengineering.com).
ANSYS (2006). User's manual (Version 10.0). ANSYS Inc., Canonsburg, PA.
, , and (2000). Evaluation of the effect of construction tolerances on vessel strength. Ship Structure Committee Report, SSC-411, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
(1991). “Testing and analysis of 1/3-scale welded steel frigate model.”Proceedings of the International Conference on Advances in Marine Structures, Dunfermline, Scotland, pp. 749–773.Google Scholar
DNV (2000). Structural design of offshore ships. (Offshore Standards, DNV-OS-C102), Det Norske Veritas, Oslo, January.
(2006). “Brittle fracture in ships – A lingering problem.” Ships and Offshore Structures, 1(3): 229–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DYNA3D (2004). User's manual (Version 960), Livermore Software, CA.
(1974). “Limit analysis for plates: The exact solution for a clamped square plate of isotropic homogeneous material obeying the square yield criterion and loaded by a uniform pressure.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series A (Mathematical and Physical Sciences), 277: 121–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1997). “Interaction equation for the collapse of tankers and containerships under combined bending moments.” Journal of Ship Research, 41(3): 230–240.Google Scholar
IACS (2005). Common structural rules for double hull oil tankers. International Association of Classification Societies (http://www.jtprules.com), London, December.
(1975). “Plastic behavior of beams and plates.” In Ship structural design concepts. Cambridge, MD: Cornell Maritime Press, pp. 747–778.Google Scholar
(2001). Effective FPSO/FSO hull structural design. Offshore Technology Conference, OTC 13212, Houston, May.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MAESTRO (2006). Version 8.7.2. Proteus Engineering, Stevensville, MD (http://www.proteusengineering.com).
(1938). “Zur theorie der gekreummter platte grosser formaenderung.”Proceedings of the 5th International Congress for Applied Mechanics, Germany.Google Scholar
NORSOK N004 (1999). Design of steel structures. Norwegian Standards, Norway.
, , and (2005). Rational interaction design equations for the ultimate longitudinal strength of tankers, bulk carriers, general cargo, and container ships under coupled bending moment. Department of Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering, Universities of Glasgow and Strathclyde, Glasgow.Google Scholar
(1994). “Tensile behavior of local members on ship hull collapse.” Journal of Ship Research, 38(3): 239–244.Google Scholar
(1995). “A new concept of the effective shear modulus for a plate buckled in shear.” Journal of Ship Research, 39(1): 70–75.Google Scholar
(2004). “A guide for the ultimate longitudinal strength assessment of ships.” Marine Technology, 41(3): 122–139.Google Scholar
, and (2005). “A semi-analytical method for the elastic-plastic large deflection analysis of stiffened panels under combined biaxial compression/tension, biaxial in-plane bending, edge shear and lateral pressure loads.” Thin-Walled Structures, 43: 375–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , and (2004). “Design principles and criteria for ship structures under impact pressure actions arising from sloshing, slamming and green water.” SNAME Transactions, 112: 292–313.Google Scholar
, and (1995). A simple formulation for predicting the ultimate strength of ships. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 1(1): 52–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2003). Ultimate limit state design of steel-plated structures. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
, , and (1996). “Ultimate strength of ship hulls under combined vertical bending, horizontal bending, and shearing forces.” SNAME Transactions, 104: 31–59.Google Scholar
, , and (2004). “Effect of initial deflection shape on the ultimate strength behavior of welded steel plates under biaxial compressive loads.” Journal of Ship Research, 48(1): 45–60.Google Scholar
, , , and (2001). “A semi-analytical method for the elastic-plastic large deflection analysis of welded steel or aluminum plating under combined in-plane and lateral pressure loads.” Thin-Walled Structures, 39: 125–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , and (2005). “Ultimate limit state design technology for aluminum multi-hull ship structures.” SNAME Transactions, 113: 270–305.Google Scholar
, , and (1995). “Estimation of deflection of steel panel under impulsive loading.” Journal of the Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers, 61: 2241–2246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1977). “Influence of local compressive failure on ultimate longitudinal strength of ship's hull.” Proceedings of the International Symposium on Practical Design in Shipbuilding, Tokyo, pp. 73–79.Google Scholar
, , , and (2004). “Computerized buckling models for ultimate strength assessment of stiffened ship hull panels.” Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Practical Design of Ships and Floating Structures, Vol. 1, pp. 235–242.Google Scholar
(1976). Stiffened panels: Bending, stability, and vibrations. Amsterdom, The Netherlands: Elsevier Scientific Publishing.Google Scholar
, and (1974). “An ultimate transverse strength analysis of ship structures.” Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Japan, 136: 309–324 (in Japanese).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1984). “The idealized structural unit method and its application to deep girder structures.” Computers and Structures, 18(2): 277–293.Google Scholar