Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures
- List of tables
- List of contributors
- Preface
- Introduction: social comparison processes and levels of analysis
- Part 1 Cognition: comparison processes within and between individuals
- Part 2 Intergroup relations: comparison processes within and between groups
- 5 Predicting comparison choices in intergroup settings: a new look
- 6 The variable impact of upward and downward social comparisons on self-esteem: when the level of analysis matters
- 7 Attitudes toward redistributive social policies: the effects of social comparisons and policy experience
- 8 Social comparison and group-based emotions
- 9 The counter-intuitive effect of relative gratification on intergroup attitudes: ecological validity, moderators and mediators
- 10 Social comparison and the personal group discrimination discrepancy
- Part 3 Culture: comparison processes within and across cultures
- Author index
- Subject index
- References
9 - The counter-intuitive effect of relative gratification on intergroup attitudes: ecological validity, moderators and mediators
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 October 2009
Edited by
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures
- List of tables
- List of contributors
- Preface
- Introduction: social comparison processes and levels of analysis
- Part 1 Cognition: comparison processes within and between individuals
- Part 2 Intergroup relations: comparison processes within and between groups
- 5 Predicting comparison choices in intergroup settings: a new look
- 6 The variable impact of upward and downward social comparisons on self-esteem: when the level of analysis matters
- 7 Attitudes toward redistributive social policies: the effects of social comparisons and policy experience
- 8 Social comparison and group-based emotions
- 9 The counter-intuitive effect of relative gratification on intergroup attitudes: ecological validity, moderators and mediators
- 10 Social comparison and the personal group discrimination discrepancy
- Part 3 Culture: comparison processes within and across cultures
- Author index
- Subject index
- References
Summary
After five decades of research revealing that relative deprivation (RD) is a central variable in the explanation of intergroup prejudice, recent research suggests that the opposite of RD, the relatively ignored relative gratification (RG), is also an important determinant of prejudice. This chapter summarizes both recent studies and current development in this line of research. After presenting several experiments that test the respective effects of both RD and RG on intergroup attitudes, we address the question of the ecological validity of the RG effect. By looking at South African data, we show that the effect of RG on prejudice is not merely a laboratory artefact, nor is it limited to the French intergroup context. Finally, in the last part, we focus more directly on the “understanding” dimension by testing both moderators and mediators of the RG effect.
Understanding intergroup conflict and the factors that contribute to stereotyping and prejudice is a fundamental problem that has attracted the attention of social psychologists for many years. This chapter examines a new theoretical perspective in the explanation of prejudice. This perspective suggests that Relative Gratification (RG), the complete opposite of Relative Deprivation (RD), is a powerful determinant of various forms of negative or hostile intergroup attitudes. In common with relative deprivation theory (Walker and Smith, 2002), social identity theory (Tajfel and Turner, 1986), Equity Theory (Walster, Walster, and Berscheid 1978), and the five-stage model of intergroup relations (Taylor and McKirnan, 1984), this new perspective based on RG shares the assumption that social comparison processes are fundamental to an understanding of intergroup conflict (see Taylor and Moghaddam, 1994 for an overview of these theories).
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Social Comparison and Social PsychologyUnderstanding Cognition, Intergroup Relations, and Culture, pp. 206 - 227Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2005
References
and (1988). Relative deprivation and the ethnic attitudes of Blacks and Afrikaans speaking Whites in South Africa. Journal of Social Psychology, 128, 311–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (1994). Happiness and stereotypic thinking in social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 621–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, D. T. (1965). Ethnocentric and other altruistic motives. In (ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (Vol. xiii, pp. 183–311). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Cook, T. D., Crosby, F., and Hennigan, K. M. (1977). The construct validity of relative deprivation. In and (eds.), Social comparison processes. Washington, DC: Hemisphere.Google Scholar
Crocker, J., Major, B., and Steele, C. (1998). Social stigma. In , , and (eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th edn.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Dambrun, M. (2001). Dominance sociale et préjugés: la régulation sociale des cognitions intergroupes. Doctoral dissertation, Laboratoire de Psychologie Sociale et Cognitive, Université Blaise Pascal, Clermont-Ferrand published in Thèses à la carte. Reference: 01CLF20009 – 288 pages – ISBN: 2–284–03961–8
(2004). Belief in paranormal determinism as a source of prejudice towards disadvantaged groups: “The dark side of stars.”Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 32, 627–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2000). Inducing “superior intelligence”: The effect of relative gratification on intergroup attitudes in a new context. Unpublished data. Université Blaise Pascal, France.Google Scholar
and (2001). La théorie de la privation relative et l'hostilité envers les Nord-Africains. ⁛Relative deprivation theory and hostility towards North Africans⁝. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale/International Review of Social Psychology, 14, 57–89.Google Scholar
and (2004). Implicit and explicit measures of prejudice and stereotyping: do they assess the same underlying knowledge structure?European Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 663–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2004). Relative gratification and fulfilment of expectations. Unpublished data. Université Blaise Pascal, France.Google Scholar
, , , and (2002). Modélisation de quelques déterminants psychosociaux de l'attitude envers l'extrême droite. ⁛Modelling the social-psychological determinants of support for extreme right-wing movements⁝Les Cahiers Internationaux de Psychologie Sociale, 55, 49–63.Google Scholar
Dambrun, M. and Taylor, D. M. (2003). Intergroup attitudes in post-apartheid South-Africa: Foreigners as a prime target of prejudice. Report #1 for the Southern African Migration Project (SAMP), January 2003. Unpublished Report, McGill University, Canada.
Dambrun, M., Taylor, D. M., McDonald, D., and Crush, J. (2005). The relative deprivation-gratification continuum and attitudes towards immigrants in South Africa: a test of the v-curve hypothesis. Manuscript under review.
and (1996). Group relative deprivation: Cognitive and affective components and protest orientation among Indian South Africans. The Journal of Social Psychology, 136, 579–588.Google Scholar
, , and (2002). Social identity as both cause and effect: The development of group identification in response to anticipated and actual changes in the intergroup status hierarchy. British Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 57–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dubé, L. and Guimond, S. (1986). Relative deprivation and social protest. In , , and (eds.). Relative deprivation and social comparison: the Ontario symposium. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Duckitt, J. and Mphuthing, T. (2002). Relative deprivation and intergroup attitudes – South Africa before and after the transition. In and (eds.), Relative deprivation: specification, development and integration (pp. 69–90). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
, , and (1998). Intergroup competition and attitudes toward immigrants and immigration: An instrumental model of group conflict. Journal of Social Issues, 54, 699–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , and (1995). Variability in automatic activation as an unobtrusive measure of racial attitudes: A bona fide pipeline?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1013–1027.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (1996). Us and them: mood effects on intergroup discrimination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 28–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1991). The trouble of thinking: activation and application of stereotypic beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 509–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1995) From ethnocentrism to collective protest: responses to relative deprivation and threats to social identity. Social Psychology Quarterly, 58, 195–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1973). The strange case of relative gratification and potential for political violence: the V-curve hypothesis. American Political Science Review, 57, 514–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2002). When prosperity breeds intergroup hostility: the effects of relative deprivation and relative gratification on prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 900–912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1983). Relative deprivation theory and the Quebec nationalist movement: the cognition-emotion distinction and the personal-group deprivation issue. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 526–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (2002). Social identity, relative group status, and intergroup attitudes: when favourable outcomes change intergroup relations … for the worse. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 739–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guimond, S. and Tougas, F. (1994). Sentiments d'injustice et actions collectives: la privation relative. In and (ed.). Stéréotypes, discrimination et relations intergroupes. Liège: Mardaga.Google Scholar
and (2000) Effects of perceived economic competition on people's willingness to help empower immigrants. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 3, 419–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1995). Social identity and affect as determinants of collective action: Toward an integration of relative deprivation and social identity theories. Theory and Psychology, 5, 551–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1972). Ethnocentrism: Theories of conflict, ethnic attitudes, and group behavior. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
(1981). Relative deprivation: a theory of distributive injustice for an era of shrinking resources. Research in Organizational Behavior, 3, 53–107.Google Scholar
, , , and (1999). Still waiting for the barbarians: South African attitudes to immigrants and immigration. Southern African Migration Project. Migration policy Series No. 14. Cape Town: Idasa.Google Scholar
and (1992). Individual and collective mobility strategies among minority group members. Journal of Social Psychology, 132, 343–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1999). Ethnocentrism, social identification and discrimination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 92–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1995). Subtle and blatant prejudice in western Europe. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 57–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , , , , and (1998). Outgroup prejudice in Western Europe. European Review of Social Psychology, 8, 241–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pratto, F. (1999). The puzzle of continuing group inequality: piecing together psychological, social, and cultural forces in social dominance theory. In (eds.). Advances in experimental social psychology, (Vol. xxxi, pp. 191–263). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
, , , and (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1966). Group conflict and co-operation: Their social psychology. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
and (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1971). Current stereotypes: A little fading, a little faking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 18, 247–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (1994). The influence of personal deprivation and salience of group membership on justice evaluations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 277–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tajfel, H. and Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behaviour. In and (eds.), Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar
and (1984). A five stage model of intergroup relations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 291–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1994). Theories of intergroup relations: International social psychological perspectives. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
, , and (1989). Social comparison in an intergroup context. Journal of Social Psychology, 129, 499–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tougas, F. and Beaton, A. M. (2002). Personal and group relative deprivation: Connecting the “I” to the “we.” In and , Relative deprivation: Specification, development, and integration (pp. 119–136). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
, , and (1987). Privation relative et programmes d'action positive. Revue Canadienne des Sciences du Comportements, 19, 167–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1981). Relative deprivation and intergroup attitudes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 11, 313–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1972) Race and relative deprivation in the urban United States. Race, 13, 461–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (eds.) (2002). Relative deprivation: Specification, development, and integration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
, , and (2000). A model of dual attitudes. Psychological Review, 107, 101–126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , and (1997). Evidence for racial prejudice at the implicit level and its relationship with questionnaire measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 262–274.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wright, S. C. and Tropp, L. (2002). Collective action in response to disadvantage: Intergroup perceptions, social identification and social change. In and (eds.), Relative deprivation: Specification, development, and integration (pp. 200–236). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by