Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-sh8wx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T11:00:00.735Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2015

John H. Goldthorpe
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, A. 1992. ‘What do cases do? Some notes on activity in sociological analysis’, in Ragin, C. C. and Becker, H. S. (eds), What is a case?Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Abbott, A. 1995. ‘Sequence analysis: new methods for old ideas’, Annual Review of Sociology 21: 93–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abbott, A. 2001. Chaos of disciplines. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Abbott, A. and Tsay, A. 2000. ‘Sequence analysis and optimal matching methods in sociology’, Sociological Methods and Research 29: 3–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abrams, P. 1980. Historical sociology. Bath: Open Books.Google Scholar
Achen, C. H. 1982. Interpreting and using regression. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Achen, C. H. 2005. ‘Two cheers for Charles Ragin’, Studies in Comparative International Development, 40: 27–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aisenbrey, S. and Fasang, A. E. 2010. ‘New life for old ideas: the “second wave” of sequence analysis bringing the “course” back into the life course’, Sociological Methods and Research 38: 420–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, A. 2008. The changing distribution of earnings in OECD countries. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, A. and Piketty, T. 2010. Top incomes: a global perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Augier, M. and March, J. G. (eds) 2004. Models of man: essays in memory of Herbert A. Simon. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Baines, D. and Johnson, P. 1999. ‘In search of the “traditional” working class: social mobility and occupational continuity in interwar London’, Economic History Review 52: 692–713.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baron-Cohen, S. 1991. ‘Precursors to a theory of mind: understanding attention in others’, in Whiten, A. (ed.), Natural theories of mind. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Baron-Cohen, S. 1995. Mindblindness: an essay on autism and theory of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Barrett, L., Dunbar, R. I. M. and Lycett, J. 2002. Human evolutionary psychology. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, R. 2003. ‘Educational expansion and persistent inequalities of education in Germany’, European Sociological Review 19: 1–24.Google Scholar
Bell, C. and Newby, H. (eds) 1974. The sociology of community. London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
Bennett, A. 2008. ‘Process tracing: a Bayesian perspective’, in Box-Steffensmeier, J. M., Brady, H. E. and Collier, D. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Berg, N. and Gigerenzer, G. 2010. ‘As-if behavioural economics: neoclassical economics in disguise?’, History of Economic Ideas 18: 133–65.Google Scholar
Berk, R. A. 2004. Regression analysis: a constructive critique. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Billari, F. C. 2005. ‘Life course analysis: two (complementary) cultures?’, Advances in Life Course Research 10: 261–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Billari, F. C. 2015. ‘Integrating macro- and micro-level approaches in the explanation of population change’, Population Studies 69: S11–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bird, A. and Tobin, E. 2012. ‘Natural kinds’, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/archive/win2012/entries/natural-kinds/ (last accessed 1 May 2015).
Blalock, H. M. 1961. Causal inferences in non-experimental research. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Blanden, J., Wilson, K., Haveman, R. and Smeeding, T. M. 2010. ‘Understanding the mechanisms behind intergenerational persistence: a comparison of the United States and Great Britain’, in Smeeding, T. M., Erikson, R. and Jäntti, M. (eds), Persistence, privilege, and parenting. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Blau, P. M. and Duncan, O. D. 1967. The American occupational structure. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Blaug, M. 1992. The methodology of economics, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blossfeld, H.-P. and Prein, G. (eds) 1998. Rational choice theory and large-scale data analysis. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Blossfeld, H.-P. and Hofmeister, H. (eds) 2006. Globalization, uncertainty and women's careers. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blossfeld, H.-P., Mills, M. and Bernhardi, F. (eds) 2006. Globalization, uncertainty and men's careers. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blumer, H. 1956. ‘Sociological analysis and the “variable”’, American Sociological Review 21: 683–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohrnstedt, G. W. 2010. ‘Measurement models for survey research’, in Marsden, P. V. and Wright, J. D. (eds), Handbook of survey research, 2nd edn. Bingley: Emerald.Google Scholar
Booth, C. 1889–1903. Life and labour of the people of London. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Boudon, R. 1987. ‘The individualistic tradition in sociology’, in Alexander, J. C., Giesen, B., Münch, R. and Smelser, N. J. (eds), The micro-macro link. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Boudon, R. 1990. ‘Individualism and holism in the social sciences’, in Birnbaum, P. and Leca, J. (eds), Individualism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Boudon, R. 1996. ‘The “cognitivist model”: a generalised “rational choice” model’, Rationality and Society 8: 123–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boudon, R. 2003a. Raison, bonnes raisons. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
Boudon, R. 2003b. Y-a-t-il encore une sociologie?Paris: Odile Jacob.Google Scholar
Bowley, A. L. 1906. ‘Address to the economic science and statistics section of the British Association for the Advancement of Science’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 47: 607–25.Google Scholar
Bowley, A. L. and Burnett-Hurst, A. R. 1915. Livelihood and poverty. London: Bell.Google Scholar
Boyd, P. and Richerson, P. J. 1999. ‘Norms and bounded rationality’, in Gigerenzer, G. and Selten, R. (eds), Bounded rationality: the adaptive toolbox. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Brady, H. E., Collier, D. and Seawright, J. 2006. ‘Toward a pluralistic vision of methodology’, Political Analysis 14: 353–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breen, R. (ed.) 2004. Social mobility in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breen, R. and Goldthorpe, J. H. 1997. ‘Explaining educational differentials: towards a formal rational action theory’, Rationality and Society 9: 275–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breen, R. and Yaish, M. 2006. ‘Testing the Breen-Goldthorpe model of educational decision-making’, in Morgan, S., Grusky, D. B. and Fields, G. S. (eds), Mobility and inequality: frontiers of research from sociology and economics. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Breen, R., van de Werfhorst, H. and Jaeger, M. M. 2014. ‘Deciding under doubt: a theory of risk aversion, time discounting preferences and educational decision-making’, European Sociological Review 30: 258–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breiman, L. 2001. ‘Statistical modelling: the two cultures’ (with discussion), Statistical Science 16: 199–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruni, L. and Sugden, R. 2007. ‘The road not taken: how psychology was removed from economics and how it might be brought back’, Economic Journal 117: 146–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buis, M. L. 2013. ‘The composition of family background: the influence of the economic and cultural resources of both parents on the offspring's educational attainment in the Netherlands between 1939 and 1981’, European Sociological Review 29: 593–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bukodi, E. 2012. ‘The relationship between work history and partnership formation in cohorts of British men born in 1958 and 1970’, Population Studies 66: 123–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bukodi, E. and Goldthorpe, J. H. 2013. ‘Decomposing “social origins”: the effects of parents’ class, status and education on the educational attainment of their children’, European Sociological Review 29: 1024–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bukodi, E., Erikson, R. and Goldthorpe, J. H. 2014. ‘The effects of social origins and cognitive ability on educational attainment: evidence from Britain and Sweden’, Acta Sociologica 57: 293–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bukodi, E., Goldthorpe, J. H., Waller, L. and Kuha, J. 2014. ‘The mobility problem in Britain: new findings from the analysis of birth cohort data’, British Journal of Sociology 66: 93–117.Google ScholarPubMed
Bukodi, E., Waller, L., Goldthorpe, J. H. and Halpin, B. 2015. ‘Is education now class destiny? Class histories across three British birth cohorts’. Workshop on Algorithmic Methods in Social Research, Nuffield College, Oxford.
Burawoy, M. 2004. ‘Manifesto for public sociology’, Social Problems 51: 124–30.Google Scholar
Burawoy, M. 2005. ‘For public sociology’, American Sociological Review 70: 4–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, D. 2012. ‘UK sociology and quantitative methods: are we as weak as they think? Or are they barking up the wrong tree?’, Sociology 46: 13–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carmines, E. G. and Zeller, R. A. 1979. Reliability and validity assessment. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrithers, M. 1992. Why humans have cultures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cartwright, N. 2007. Hunting causes and using them. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cartwright, N. and Hardie, J. 2012. Evidence-based policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castellani, B. 2014. ‘Complexity and the failure of quantitative social science’, Discover Society. http://www.discoversociety.org/2014/11/04/focus-complexity-and-the-failure-of-quantitative-social-science/ (last accessed 1 May 2015).
Chan, T.-W. (ed.) 2010. Social status and cultural consumption. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, T.-W. and Goldthorpe, J. H. 2007. ‘Class and status: the conceptual distinction and its empirical relevance’, American Sociological Review 72: 512–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christakis, N. and Fowler, J. 2010. Connected. London: Harper.Google Scholar
Clark, C. 2013. The sleepwalkers: how Europe went to war in 1914. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Clawson, D., Zussman, R., Misra, J., Gerstel, N., Stokes, R. and Anderton, D. L. (eds) 2007. Public sociology. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Cobban, A. 1965. The social interpretation of the French revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cochran, W. G. 1965. ‘The planning of observational studies of human populations’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A 128: 234–66.Google Scholar
Cole, S. 1994. ‘Why sociology doesn't make progress like the natural sciences’, Sociological Forum 9: 133–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, J. S. 1986. ‘Social theory, social research, and a theory of action’, American Journal of Sociology 91: 1309–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, J. S. 1990. Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.Google Scholar
Collier, D., Brady, H. E. and Seawright, J. 2004. ‘Sources of leverage in causal inference: towards and alternative view of methodology’, in Brady, H. E. and Collier, D. (eds), Rethinking social inquiry. Lanham: Rowmanand Littlefield.Google Scholar
Cooper, B. 2005. ‘Applying Ragin's crisp and fuzzy set QCA to large datasets: social class and educational achievement in the National Child Development Study’, Sociological Research Online. http://www.socresonline.org.uk/10/2/cooper1.html (last accessed 1 May 2015).
Cornfield, J., Haenszel, W., Hammond, E. C., Lilienfeld, A. M., Shimkin, M. B. and Wynder, E. L. 1959. ‘Smoking and lung cancer: recent evidence and a discussion of some questions’, Journal of the National Cancer Institute 22: 173–203.Google Scholar
Couper, M. P. 2013. ‘Is the sky falling? New technology, changing media, and the future of surveys’, Survey Research Methods 7: 145–56.Google Scholar
Cox, D. R. 1992. ‘Causality: some statistical aspects’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A 155: 291–301.Google Scholar
Cox, D. R. 2001. ‘Comment’ on Breiman (2001).
Cox, D. R. and Wermuth, N. 1996. Multivariate dependencies: models, analysis and interpretation. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Cox, D. R. and Donnelly, C. A. 2011. Principles of applied statistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahrendorf, R. 1959. Class and class conflict in industrial society. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dalal, S. R., Fowlkes, E. B. and Hoadley, B. 1989. ‘Risk analysis of the space shuttle: pre-Challenger prediction of failure’, Journal of the American Statistical Association 84: 945–57.Google Scholar
Davidson, D. 1980. Essays on actions and events. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Davies, R., Heinesen, E. and Holm, A. 2002. ‘The relative risk aversion hypothesis of educational choice’, Journal of Population Economics 15: 683–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, K. and Moore, W. E. 1945. ‘Some principles of stratification’, American Sociological Review 10: 242–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deaton, A. 2010. ‘Instruments, randomization, and learning about development’, Journal of Economic Literature 48: 424–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennett, D. C. 1995. Darwin's dangerous idea. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Desrosières, A. 1991. ‘The part in relation to the whole: how to generalise? The pre-history of representative sampling’, in Bulmer, M., Bales, K. and Sklar, K. K. (eds), The social survey in historical perspective, 1880–1940. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Desrosières, A. 1993. La politique des grands nombres. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar
DiPrete, T. A. and Eirich, G. M. 2006. ‘Cumulative advantage as a mechanism for inequality: a review of theory and evidence’, Annual Review of Sociology 32: 271–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunbar, R. I. M. 2000. ‘Causal reasoning, mental rehearsal and the evolution of primate cognition’, in Heyes, C. and Huber, L. (eds), The evolution of cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dunbar, R. I. M. 2004. The human story: a new history of mankind's evolution. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
Dunbar, R. I. M. 2014. Human evolution. London: Pelican Books.Google Scholar
Duncan, O. D. 1961. ‘A socioeconomic index for all occupations’, in Reiss, A. J. (ed.), Occupations and social status. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Duncan, O. D. 1975. Introduction to structural equation models. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Duncan, O. D. 1984. Notes on social measurement. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
Duncan, O. D. 1992. ‘What if?’, Contemporary Sociology 21: 667–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durkheim, E. 1895/1938. The rules of sociological method. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Durkheim, E. 1897/1952. Suicide. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Edgerton, R. B. 1992. Sick societies: challenging the myth of primitive harmony. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Edgeworth, F. Y. 1885. ‘Observations and statistics: an essay on the theory of errors and the first principles of statistics’, Transactions of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 14: 138–69.Google Scholar
Elster, J. 1979. Ulysses and the sirens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Elster, J. 1983. Sour grapes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elster, J. 1989. Nuts and bolts for the social sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elster, J. 1997. ‘More than enough’, University of Chicago Law Review 64: 748–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elster, J. 1998. ‘A plea for mechanisms’, in Hedström, P. and Swedberg, R. (eds), Social mechanisms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Elster, J. 2007. Explaining social behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, J. M. 2006. Generative social science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Erikson, R. 1998. ‘Thresholds and mechanisms’, in Blossfeld, H.-P. and Prein, G. (eds), Rational choice theory and large-scale data analysis. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Erikson, R. and Goldthorpe, J. H. 1992. The constant flux. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Erikson, R. and Jonsson, J. O. 1996. ‘Explaining class inequality in education: the Swedish test case’, in Erikson, R. and Jonsson, J. O. (eds), Can education be equalized?Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Erikson, R., Goldthorpe, J. H. and Hällsten, M. 2012. ‘No way back up from ratcheting down? A critique of the “microclass” approach to the analysis of social mobility’, Acta Sociologica 55: 211–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esser, H. 1996. ‘What is wrong with variable sociology?’, European Sociological Review 12: 159–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esser, H. 1999. Soziologie. Spezielle Grundlagen. Band 1: Situationslogik und Handeln. Frankfurt: Campus.Google Scholar
Evans, G. and De Graaf, N. D. (eds) 2013. Political choice matters. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferri, E., Bynner, J. and Wadsworth, M. 2003. Changing Britain, changing lives: three generations at the turn of the century. London: Institute of Education.Google Scholar
Fisher, R. A. 1922. ‘On the dominance ratio’, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 52: 321–41.Google Scholar
Fisher, R. A. 1925. Statistical methods for research workers. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
Frankenberg, R. 1966. Communities in Britain. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Freedman, D. A. 1991. ‘Statistical analysis and shoe leather’, Sociological Methodology 21: 291–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freedman, D. A. 1992. ‘As others see us: a case study in path analysis’, in Shaffer, J. P. (ed.), The role of models in nonexperimental social science: two debates. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association and American Statistical Association.Google Scholar
Freedman, D. A. 1997. ‘From association to causation via regression’, in McKim, V. R. and Turner, S. P. (eds), Causality in crisis?Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press.Google Scholar
Freedman, D. A. 2010. Statistical models and causal inference: a dialogue with the social sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Galea, S. and Link, B. G. 2013. ‘Six paths for the future of social epidemiology’, American Journal of Epidemiology 178: 843–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Galton, F. 1889a. Natural inheritance. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galton, F. 1889b. ‘Comments’ on Tylor (1889).
Gambetta, D. 2009. ‘Signalling’, in Hedström, P. and Bearman, P. (eds), The Oxford handbook of analytical sociology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gärdenfors, P. 2006. How Homo became sapiens. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelman, A. 2011. ‘Causality and statistical learning’, American Journal of Sociology 117: 955–66.Google Scholar
Gelman, A. and Imbens, G. 2013. ‘Why ask why? Forward causal inference and reverse causal questions’. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 19614.
George, A. L. and Bennett, A. 2005. Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. 1979. Central problems in social theory. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giddens, A. 1984. The constitution of society. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Gigerenzer, G. 2008. Rationality for mortals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gigerenzer, G. and Selten, R. (eds) 1999. Bounded rationality: the adaptive toolbox. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gigerenzer, G. and Todd, P. M. 1999. ‘Fast and frugal heuristics: the adaptive toolbox’, in Gigerenzer, G. and Todd, P. M. (eds), Simple heuristics that make us smart. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gigerenzer, G., Swijtink, Z., Porter, T., Daston, L., Beatty, J. and Krüger, L. 1989. The empire of chance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillispie, C. C. 1963. ‘Intellectual factors in the background of analysis by probabilities’, in Crombie, A. C. (ed.), Scientific change. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Ginsberg, M. 1965. ‘Introduction’ to 1965 reprint of Hobhouse, Wheeler and Ginsberg (1915).
Glass, D. V. 1973. Numbering the people. Farnborough: Saxon House.Google Scholar
Goertz, G. and Mahoney, J. 2009. ‘Scope in case study research’, in Byrne, D. and Ragin, C. C. (eds), The Sage handbook of case-based methods. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
Goldstone, J. A. 1995. ‘Predicting revolutions: why we could (and should) have foreseen the revolutions of 1989–91 in the USSR and Eastern Europe’, in Keddie, N. R. (ed.), Debating revolutions. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Goldstone, J. A. 2003. ‘Comparative historical analysis and knowledge accumulation in the study of revolutions’, in Mahoney, J. and Rueschemeyer, D. (eds), Comparative historical analysis in the social sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goldthorpe, J. H. 1987. Social mobility and class structure in modern Britain, 2nd edn. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Goldthorpe, J. H. 1994. ‘The uses of history in sociology: a reply’, British Journal of Sociology 45: 55–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldthorpe, J. H. 1996. ‘Class analysis and the reorientation of class theory: the case of persisting differentials in educational attainment’, British Journal of Sociology 47: 481–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldthorpe, J. H. 2007. On sociology, 2nd edn, 2 vols. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Goldthorpe, J. H. 2012. ‘Back to class and status: or why a sociological view of social inequality should be re-asserted’, Revista española de investigaciones sociológicas 137: 1–16.Google Scholar
Goldthorpe, J. H. 2013. ‘Understanding – and misunderstanding – social mobility: the entry of the economists, the confusion of politicians and the limits of educational policy’, Journal of Social Policy 42: 431–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldthorpe, J. H. 2014. ‘The role of education in intergenerational social mobility: problems from empirical research in sociology and some theoretical pointers from economics’, Rationality and Society 26: 265–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldthorpe, J. H., Lockwood, D., Bechhofer, F. and Platt, J. 1969. The affluent worker in the class structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goodman, L. A. 2007a. ‘Statistical magic and/or statistical serendipity: an age of progress in the analysis of categorical data’, Annual Review of Sociology 33: 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, L. A. 2007b. ‘Otis Dudley Duncan, quantitative sociologist par excellence: path analysis, loglinear methods, and Rasch models’, Research in Social Stratification and Mobility 25: 129–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granovetter, M. 1995. Getting a job: a study of contacts and careers, 2nd edn. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Grusky, D. B. and Hauser, R. M. 1984. ‘Comparative social mobility revisited: models of divergence and convergence in 16 countries’, American Sociological Review 49: 19–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haack, S. 1998. Manifesto of a passionate moderate. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hacking, I. 1987. ‘Was there a probabilistic revolution, 1800–1930?’, in Krüger, L., Daston, L. J. and Heidelberger, M. (eds), The probabilistic revolution, vol. 1. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hacking, I. 1990. The taming of chance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacking, I. 2000. The social construction of what?Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Halbwachs, M. 1912. La classe ouvrière et les niveaux de vie. Paris: Alcan.Google Scholar
Halpin, B. and Chan, T.-W. 1998. ‘Class careers as sequences: an optimal matching of work-life histories’, European Sociological Review 14, 111–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, N. 1989. ‘Gender and the rise and fall of class politics’, New Left Review I/175: 19–47.Google Scholar
Hart, N. 1994. ‘John Goldthorpe and the relics of sociology’, British Journal of Sociology 45: 21–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hauser, R. M. and Warren, J. R. 1997. ‘Socioeconomic indexes for occupations: a review, update and critique’, Sociological Methodology 44: 203–18.Google Scholar
Hausman, D. M. 1992. The inexact and separate science of economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hechter, M. 1995. ‘Reflections on historical prophecy in the social sciences’, American Journal of Sociology 100: 1520–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedström, P. 2005. Dissecting the social. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedström, P. and Swedberg, R. 1998a. ‘Social mechanisms: an introductory essay’, in Hedström, P. and Swedberg, R. (eds), Social mechanisms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedström, P. and Swedberg, R. (eds) 1998b. Social mechanisms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedström, P. and Bearman, P. 2009a. ‘What is analytical sociology all about? An introductory essay’, in Hedström, P. and Bearman, P. (eds), The Oxford handbook of analytical sociology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hedström, P. and Bearman, P. (eds) 2009b. The Oxford handbook of analytical sociology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hempel, C. G. 1965. Aspects of scientific explanation. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Hobhouse, L. T., Wheeler, G. C. and Ginsberg, M. 1915. The material culture and social institutions of the simpler peoples. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Hogben, L. (ed.) 1938. Political arithmetic. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Holland, P. 1986. ‘Statistics and causal inference’, Journal of the American Statistical Association 81: 945–60.Google Scholar
Hollis, M. 1977. Models of man. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hollis, M. 1987. The cunning of reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Holm, A. and Jaeger, M. M. 2008. ‘Does relative risk aversion explain educational inequality? A dynamic choice approach’, Research in Social Stratification and Mobility 26: 199–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Homans, G. C. 1964. ‘Bringing men back in’, American Sociological Review 29: 809–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hope, K. 1984. As others see us: schooling and social mobility in Scotland and the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hoselitz, B. F. 1952. The progress of underdeveloped areas. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Hox, J. J. 2010. Multilevel analysis. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hug, S. 2013. ‘Qualitative comparative analysis: How inductive use and measurement error lead to problematic inference’, Political Analysis 21: 252–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Illari, P. M., Russo, F. and Williamson, J. (eds) 2011. Causality in the sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, R. and Norris, P. 2003. Rising tide: gender equality and cultural change around the world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ishida, H. (ed.) 2008. Social stratification and social mobility in late-industrializing countries. Tokyo: SSM Research Series 14.Google Scholar
Jablonka, E. and Lamb, M. J. 2005. Evolution in four dimensions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, M. V. (ed.) 2013. Determined to succeed: performance versus choice in educational attainment. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaeger, M. M. 2007. ‘Educational mobility across three generations: the changing impact of parental social class, economic, social and cultural capital’, European Sociological Review 9: 527–50.Google Scholar
Jencks, C. 1972. Inequality. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Jencks, C. 1979. Who gets ahead?New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Jonsson, J. O., Grusky, D. B., Di Carlo, M., Pollak, R. and Brinton, M. C. 2009. ‘Microclass mobility: social reproduction in four countries’, American Journal of Sociology 114: 977–1036.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaberry, P. 1957. ‘Malinowski's contribution to field-work methods and the writing of ethnography’, in Firth, R. (ed.), Man and culture: an evaluation of the work of Bronislaw Malinowski. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. 2011. Thinking fast and slow. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. 1979. ‘Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk’, Econometrica 47: 263–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendall, P. L. and Lazarsfeld, P. F. 1950. ‘Problems of survey analysis’, in Merton, R. K. and Lazarsfeld, P. F. (eds), Continuities in social research: studies in the scope and method of ‘The American Soldier’. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Kerr, C., Dunlop, J. T., Harbison, F. H. and Myers, C. A. 1960. Industrialism and industrial man. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kiaer, A. N. 1895–96. ‘Observations et expériences concernant des dénombrements représentatifs’, Bulletin of the International Statistical Institute 9: 176–83.Google Scholar
Kiaer, A. N. 1903. ‘Sur les méthodes représentatives ou typologique’, Bulletin of the International Statistical Institute 13: 66–70.Google Scholar
Kincaid, H. 2011. ‘Causal modelling, mechanism, and probability in epidemiology’, in Illari, P. M., Russo, F. and Williamson, J. (eds), Causality in the sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
King, G., Keohane, R. O. and Verba, S. 1994. Designing social inquiry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kroeber, A. L. 1917. ‘The superorganic’, American Anthropologist 19: 208–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krogslund, C., Choi, D. D. and Poertner, M. 2015. ‘Fuzzy sets on shaky grounds: parameter sensitivity and confirmation bias in fsQCA’, Political Analysis 23: 21–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krüger, L. 1987. ‘The slow rise of probabilism: philosophical arguments in the nineteenth century’, in Krüger, L., Daston, L. J. and Heidelberger, M. (eds), The probabilistic revolution, vol. 1. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Krüger, L., Daston, L. J. and Heidelberger, M. (eds) 1987. The probabilistic revolution, vol. 1. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Krüger, L., Gigerenzer, G. and Morgan, M. S. (eds) 1987. The probabilistic revolution, vol. 2. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kruskal, W. and Mosteller, F. 1980. ‘Representative sampling, IV: the history of the concept in statistics, 1895–1939’, International Statistical Review 48: 169–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, M. 2008. Quantum. Cambridge: Icon Books.Google Scholar
Kuper, A. 1973. Anthropologists and anthropology. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Laland, K. N. 1999. ‘Imitation, social learning and preparedness as mechanisms of bounded rationality’, in Gigerenzer, G., and Selten, R. (eds), Bounded rationality: the adaptive toolbox. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Laplace, P. S. 1814/1951. A philosophical essay on probabilities. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Laslett, P. 1972. ‘Introduction: the history of the family’, in Laslett, P. (ed.), Household and family in past time. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latour, B. 2000. ‘On the partial existence of existing and nonexisting objects’, in Daston, L. (ed.), Biographies of scientific objects. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lazarsfeld, P. F. 1955. ‘Interpretation of statistical relations as a research operation’, in Lazarsfeld, P. F. and Rosenberg, M. (eds), The Language of social research, Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Lazarsfeld, P. F. 1961. ‘Notes on the history of quantification in sociology’, Isis 52: 277–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazarsfeld, P. F. and Henry, N. W. 1968. Latent structure analysis. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Lazer, D., Pentland, A., Adamic, L., Aral, S., Barabási, A.-L., Brewer, D. et al. 2009. ‘Computational social science’, Science, 323: 721–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lazer, D., Kennedy, R., King, G. and Vespignani, A. 2014. ‘The parable of Google flu: traps in big data analysis’, Science 343: 1203–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leach, E. R. 1957. ‘The epistemological background to Malinowski's empiricism’, in Firth, R. (ed.), Man and culture: an evaluation of the work of Bronislaw Malinowski. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Lee, R. D. 2001. ‘Demography abandons its core’. Population Association of America, presentation at the Annual Meeting.
Leigh, A., Jencks, C. and Smeeding, T. M. 2009. ‘Health and economic inequality’, in Salverda, W. and Nolan, B. (eds), The Oxford handbook of economic inequality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Le Play, F. 1877–79. Les ouvriers européens, 2nd edn. Tours: Alfred Mame.Google Scholar
Lerner, D. 1964. The passing of traditional society. London: Collier-Macmillan.Google Scholar
Lesthaeghe, R. 2010. ‘The unfolding story of the second demographic transition’, Population and Development Review 36: 211–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levine, J. H. 2000. ‘But what have you done for us lately? Commentary on Abbott and Tsay’, Sociological Methods and Research 29: 34–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lie, E. 2002. ‘The rise and fall of sample surveys in Norway’, Science in Context 15: 385–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lieberson, S. 1987. Making it count. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lieberson, S. 2004. ‘Comments on the use and utility of QCA’, Qualitative Methods 2: 13–14.Google Scholar
Lieberson, S. and Lynn, F. B. 2002. ‘Barking up the wrong branch: scientific alternatives to the current model of sociological science’, Annual Review of Sociology 28: 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipset, S. M., Trow, M. and Coleman, J. S. 1956. Union democracy. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Lockwood, D. 1956. ‘Some remarks on “The Social System”’, British Journal of Sociology 7: 134–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lockwood, D. 1992. Solidarity and schism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Louçã, F. 2008. ‘The widest cleft in statistics: how and why Fisher opposed Neyman and Pearson’. Lisbon: Istituto Superior de Economia e Gestão, Working Paper 2–2008/DE/UECE.
Lucas, S. R. and Szatrowski, A. 2014. ‘Qualitative comparative analysis in critical perspective’, Sociological Methodology 44: 1–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, J., Smith, G. D., Harper, S., Hillemeier, M., Ross, N., Kaplan, G. A. and Wolfson, M. 2004. ‘Is income inequality a determinant of population health?’, Millbank Quarterly 82: 5–99 and 355–400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lyons, R. 2011. ‘The spread of evidence-poor medicine via flawed social-network analysis’, Statistics, Policy and Politics 2: 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackie, J. L. 1974. The cement of the universe: a study of causation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Mahon, B. 2003. The man who changed everything: the life of James Clerk Maxwell. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
Mahoney, J. and Goertz, G. 2006. ‘A tale of two cultures: contrasting quantitative and qualitative research’, Political Analysis 14: 227–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, J. and Larkin Terrie, P. 2008. ‘Comparative-historical analysis in contemporary political science’, in Box-Steffensmeier, J. M., Brady, H. E. and Collier, D. (eds), The Oxford handbook of political methodology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mahoney, J., Kimball, E. and Koivu, K. L. 2009. ‘The logic of historical explanation in the social sciences’, Comparative Political Studies 42: 114–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malinowski, B. 1926. Crime and custom in savage society. New York: Kegan Paul, Trench and Trubner.Google Scholar
Manning, R., Levine, M. and Collins, A. 2007. ‘The Kitty Genovese murder and the social psychology of helping: the parable of the 38 witnesses’, American Psychologist 6: 555–62.Google Scholar
Manting, D. 1996. ‘The changing meaning of cohabitation and marriage’, European Sociological Review 12: 53–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marsh, C. 1982. The survey method: the contribution of surveys to sociological explanation. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Marshall, G., Newby, H., Rose, D. and Vogler, C. 1988. Social class in modern Britain. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Marx, A. 2010. ‘Crisp-set qualitative comparative analysis (csQCA) and model specification: benchmarks for future csQCA applications’, International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches 4: 138–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer-Schönberger, V. and Cukier, K. 2013. Big data. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Mayr, E. 1982. The growth of biological thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mayr, E. 2001. ‘The philosophical foundations of Darwinism’, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 145: 488–95.Google ScholarPubMed
McCutcheon, A. L. and Mills, C. 1998. ‘Categorical data analysis: log-linear and latent class models’, in Scarborough, E. and Tanenbaum, E. (eds), Research strategies in the social sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mead, M. 1953. Cultural patterns and technological change. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
Merton, R. K. 1957. Social theory and social structure, 2nd edn. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Merton, R. K. 1959. ‘Notes on problem finding in sociology’, in Merton, R. K., Broom, L. and Cottrell, L. S. (eds), Sociology today: problems and prospects. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Merton, R. K. 1987. ‘Three fragments from a sociologist's notebook: establishing the phenomenon, specified ignorance and strategic research materials’, Annual Review of Sociology 13: 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mill, J. S. 1843/1973–74. A system of logic ratiocinative and inductive, in Robson, J. M. (ed.), Collected works of John Stuart Mill. Toronto, ON: Toronto University Press.Google Scholar
Mills, C. 2014. ‘The great British class fiasco’, Sociology 48: 437–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, M., Blossfeld, H.-P. and Klijzing, E. 2005. ‘Becoming an adult in uncertain times’, in Blossfeld, H.-P., Klijzing, E., Mills, M. and Kurz, K. (eds), Globalization, uncertainty and youth in society. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mitchell, J. C. 1969. Social networks in urban situations: analysis of personal relations in central African towns. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Mommsen, W. J. 1984. Max Weber and German politics 1890–1920. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Monod, J. 1970. Le hazard et la nécessité. Paris: Le Seuil.Google Scholar
Morgan, M. S. 2014. ‘Case studies’, in Cartwright, N. and Montuschi, E. (eds), Philosophy of Social Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, S. L. and Winship, C. 2007. Counterfactuals and causal Inference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrison, M. 2002. ‘Modelling populations: Pearson and Fisher on Mendelism and biometry’, British Journal of Philosophy of Science 53: 39–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murdock, G. P. 1949. Social structure. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Murdock, G. P. 1965. Culture and society. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Nazio, T. 2008. Cohabitation, family and society. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nazio, T. and Blossfeld, H.-P. 2003. ‘The diffusion of cohabitation among young women in West Germany, East Germany and Italy’, European Journal of Population 19: 47–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Need, A. and de Jong, U. 2000. ‘Educational differentials in the Netherlands: testing rational action theory’, Rationality and Society 13: 71–98.Google Scholar
Neyman, J. 1934. ‘On the two different aspects of the representative method: the method of stratified sampling and the method of purposive selection’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 97: 558–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neyman, J. 1952. Lectures and conferences on mathematical statistics and probability. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
Neyman, J. 1975. ‘Study of chance mechanisms – a quasi-Copernican revolution in science and mathematics’, in Neyman, J. (ed.), The heritage of Copernicus. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ní Bhrolcháin, M. 2001. ‘“Divorce effects” and causality in the social sciences’, European Sociological Review 17: 33–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ní Bhrolcháin, M. and Dyson, T. 2007. ‘On causation in demography: issues and illustrations’, Population and Development Review 33: 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, F. 2004. ‘The vacant “we”: remarks on public sociology’, Social Forces 82: 1619–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oppenheimer, V. K. 1994. ‘Women's rising employment and the future of the family in industrial society’, Population and Development Review 20: 293–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oppenheimer, V. K. 1997. ‘Men's career development and marriage timing during a period of rising inequality’, Demography 34: 311–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ostrom, E. 1990. Governing the commons. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, E. 2000. ‘Collective action and the evolution of social norms’, Journal of Economic Perspectives 14: 137–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palloni, A. 1998. ‘Theories and models of diffusion in sociology’. Centre for Demography and Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Working Paper 98–11.
Parsons, T. 1937. The structure of social action. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Parsons, T. 1940. ‘An analytical approach to the theory of social stratification’, American Journal of Sociology 45: 849–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parsons, T. 1952. The social system. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Parsons, T. 1966. Societies: evolutionary and comparative perspectives. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Parsons, T. 1971. The system of modern societies. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Pavlinov, I. Y. 2013. The species problem – ongoing issues. Rijeka: InTech.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pawson, R. and Tilley, N. 1997. Realistic evaluation. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Pearce, N. 1999. ‘Epidemiology as a population science’, International Journal of Epidemiology 28: S1015–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pearce, N. 2011. ‘Epidemiology in a changing world: variation, causation and ubiquitous risk factors’, International Journal of Epidemiology 40: 503–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearl, J. 2000. Causality: models, reasoning, and inference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pieckalkiewicz, J. 1934. Rapport sur les recherches concernant la structure de la population ouvrière en Pologne selon la méthode representative. Warsaw: Institute for Social Problems.Google Scholar
Piketty, T. 2014. Capital in the twenty-first century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pinker, S. 2002. The blank slate. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Platt, J. 1971. Social research in Bethnal Green. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plotkin, H. 2007. ‘The power of culture’, in Dunbar, R. I. M. and Barrett, L. (eds), The Oxford handbook of evolutionary psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Popper, K. R. 1945. The open society and its enemies. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Popper, K. R. 1957. The poverty of historicism. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Popper, K. R. 1959. The logic of scientific discovery. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Popper, K. R. 1972. Objective knowledge. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Popper, K. R. 1994. The myth of the framework. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Porter, T. 1982. ‘A statistical survey of gases: Maxwell's social physics’, Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences 8: 77–116.Google Scholar
Porter, T. 1986. The rise of statistical thinking, 1820–1900. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Quetelet, A. 1835/1842. A treatise on man and the development of his faculties. Edinburgh: Chambers.Google Scholar
Quetelet, A. 1846. Lettres à S. A. R. le Duc Régnant de Saxe-Coburg-Gotha, sur la théorie des probabilities, appliquée aux sciences morales et politiques. Brussels: Hayez.Google Scholar
Quetelet, A. 1869. Physique sociale. Brussels: Murquardt.Google Scholar
Rabin, M. 1998. ‘Psychology and economics’, Journal of Economic Literature, 36: 11–46.Google Scholar
Ragin, C. C. 1987. The comparative method. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Ragin, C. C. 2000. Fuzzy-set social science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ragin, C. C. 2013. ‘New directions in the logic of social inquiry’, Political Research Quarterly 66: 171–4.Google Scholar
Ragin, C. C. and Rihoux, B. 2004. ‘Replies to commentaries: reassurances and rebuttals’, Qualitative Methods 2: 22–4.Google Scholar
Richards, A. I. 1957. ‘The concept of culture in Malinowski's work’, in Firth, R. (ed.), Man and culture: an evaluation of the work of Bronislaw Malinowski. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Richerson, P. J. and Boyd, R. 2005. Not by genes alone. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rihoux, B. and Marx, A. 2013. ‘Qualitative comparative analysis at 25: state of play and agenda’, Political Research Quarterly 66: 167–71.Google Scholar
Rose, D. and Harrison, E. 2010. Social class in Europe: an introduction to the European Socio-Economic Classification. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rose, D. and Pevalin, D. J. (eds) 2003. A researcher's guide to the National Statistics Socio-Economic Classification. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, D. and Pevalin, D. J. (with O'Reilly, K.) 2005. The National Statistics Socio-Economic Classification: origins, development and use. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, P. R. 1995. Observational studies. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Runciman, W. G. 1998. The social animal. London: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Salganik, M. J. and Heckathorn, D. D. 2004. ‘Sampling and estimation in hidden populations using respondent-driven sampling’, Sociological Methodology 34: 193–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savage, M. and Burrows, R. 2007. ‘The coming crisis of empirical sociology’, Sociology 41: 885–899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savage, M., Devine, F., Cunningham, N., Taylor, M., Li, Y., Hjellbrekke, J. et al. 2013. ‘A new model of social class? Findings from the BBC's great class survey experiment’, Sociology 47: 219–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seawright, J. 2005. ‘Qualitative comparative analysis vis-à-vis regression’, Studies in Comparative International Development 40: 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A. K. 1986. ‘Prediction and economic theory’, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A407: 3–23.Google Scholar
Silver, C. (ed.) 1982. Frédéric Le Play on family, work and social change. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Silver, N. 2012. The signal and the noise. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. 1982. Models of bounded rationality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. 1983. Reason in human affairs. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Skocpol, T. 1979. States and social revolutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, T. M. F. 1997. ‘Social surveys and social science’, Canadian Journal of Statistics 25: 23–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sørensen, A. B. 1998. ‘Theoretical mechanisms and the empirical study of social processes’, in Hedström, P. and Swedberg, R. (eds), Social mechanisms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Spencer, H. 1873–1934. Descriptive sociology. London: various publishers.Google Scholar
Steel, D. P. 2008. Across the boundaries: extrapolation in biology and the social sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stigler, G. J. and Becker, G. S. 1977. ‘De gustibus non est disputandum’, American Economic Review 67: 76–90.Google Scholar
Stigler, S. M. 1999. ‘Statistical concepts in psychology’, in Stigler, S. M. (ed.), Statistics on the table: the history of statistical concepts and methods, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Stocké, V. 2007. ‘Explaining educational decision and effects of families’ social class position: an empirical test of the Breen-Goldthorpe model of educational attainment’, European Sociological Review 23: 505–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, R. 1997. Some British empiricists in the social sciences, 1650–1900. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sullivan, A. 2006. ‘Students as rational decision-makers: the question of beliefs and desires’, London Review of Education 4: 271–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suppes, P. 1970. A probabilistic theory of causality. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Susser, M. 1998. ‘Does risk factor epidemiology put epidemiology at risk?’, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 52: 608–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thernstrom, S. 1964. Poverty and progress: social mobility in a nineteenth century city. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, R. P. 2011. ‘Causality, theories and medicine’, in Illari, P. M., Russo, F. and Williamson, J. (eds), Causality in the sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thornton, A., Axinn, W. G. and Xie, Y. 2007. Marriage and cohabitation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilly, C. 1995. ‘The bourgeois gentilshommes of revolutionary theory’, in Keddie, N. R. (ed.), Debating revolutions. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Todd, P. M., Billari, F. C. and Simão, J. 2005. ‘Aggregate age-at-marriage patterns from individual mate-search heuristics’, Demography 42: 559–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tooby, J. and Cosmides, L. 1992. ‘The psychological foundations of culture’, in Barkow, J. H., Cosmides, L. and Tooby, J. (eds), The adapted mind. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Torssander, J. and Erikson, R. 2009. ‘Stratification and mortality – a comparison of education, class, status and income’, European Sociological Review 26: 465–74.Google Scholar
Torssander, J. and Erikson, R. 2010. ‘Marital partner and mortality: the effects of the social positions of both spouses’, International Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 63: 992–8.Google Scholar
Treiman, D. J. 1977. Occupational prestige in comparative perspective. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Tumin, M. M. 1953. ‘Some principles of stratification: a critical analysis’, American Sociological Review 18: 387–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, J. 2007. ‘Is public sociology such a good idea?’, in Nichols, L. T. (ed.), Public sociology: the contemporary debate. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
Tylor, E. B. 1889. ‘On a method of investigating the development of institutions: applied to laws of marriage and descent’, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 18: 245–56, 261–9.Google Scholar
Vansina, J. 1990. Paths in the rain forests. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Vaughan, D. 1996. The Challenger launch decision. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Verein für Sozialpolitik. 1912. Verhandlungen der Generalversammlung in Nürnberg, 1911. Leipzig: Dunker und Humblot.
Warner, W. L. and Lunt, P. S. 1941. The social life of a modern community. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Warner, W. L. and Lunt, P. S. 1948. The status system of a modern community. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Watts, D. J. 2014. ‘Common sense and sociological explanations’, American Journal of Sociology, 120: 313–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weber, M. 1892. Die Verhältnisse der Landarbeiter in ostelbischen Deutschland. Leipzig: Schriften des Vereins für Sozialpolitik.Google Scholar
Weber, M. 1906/1949. ‘A critique of Eduard Meyer's methodological views’, in The methodology of the social sciences. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Weber, M. 1908. ‘Zur Psychophysik der industriellen Arbeit’, Archiv für Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik 27: 730–70.Google Scholar
Weber, M. 1921/1948. ‘Politics as a vocation’, in Gerth, H. H. and Mills, C. W. (eds), From Max Weber: essays in sociology. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Weber, M. 1922/1948. ‘Science as a vocation’, in Gerth, H. H. and Mills, C. W. (eds), From Max Weber: essays in sociology. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Weber, M. 1922/1968. Economy and society. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, R. and Pickett, K. 2010. The spirit level: why equality is better for everyone, 2nd edn. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Winch, P. 1958. The idea of a social science and its relation to philosophy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wolf, E. 1982. Europe and the people without history. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Woolgar, S. 1988. Science: the very idea. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Woolrych, A. 2002. Britain in revolution 1625–1660. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Worrall, J. 2007. ‘Evidence in medicine and evidence-based medicine’, Philosophy Compass 6: 981–1022.Google Scholar
Wright, E. O. (ed.) 2005. Approaches to class analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, J. D. and Marsden, P. V. 2010. ‘Survey research and social science: History, current practice and future prospects’, in Marsden, P. V. and Wright, J. D. (eds), Handbook of survey research. Bingley: Emerald.Google Scholar
Wright Mills, C. 1959. The sociological imagination. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wrong, D. 1961. ‘The oversocialized conception of man in modern sociology’, American Sociological Review 26: 183–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wrong, D. 1999. The oversocialized conception of man. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
Wu, L. 2000. ‘Some comments on “Sequence analysis and optimal matching methods in sociology: Review and prospect”’, Sociological Methods and Research 29: 41–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xie, Y. 2000. ‘Demography: past, present and future’, Journal of the American Statistical Association 95: 670–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xie, Y. 2005. ‘Methodological contradictions in contemporary sociology’, Michigan Quarterly Review, XLIV: 506–11.Google Scholar
Xie, Y. 2007. ‘Otis Dudley Duncan's legacy: the demographic approach to quantitative reasoning in social science’, Research in Social Stratification and Mobility 25: 141–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yin, R. K. 2003. Case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Young, M. and Willmott, P. 1957. Family and kinship in East London. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ziman, J. 1968. Public knowledge: the social dimension of science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zonabend, F. 1992. ‘The monograph in European ethnography’, Current Sociology 40: 49–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • John H. Goldthorpe, University of Oxford
  • Book: Sociology as a Population Science
  • Online publication: 05 December 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316412565.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • John H. Goldthorpe, University of Oxford
  • Book: Sociology as a Population Science
  • Online publication: 05 December 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316412565.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • John H. Goldthorpe, University of Oxford
  • Book: Sociology as a Population Science
  • Online publication: 05 December 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316412565.012
Available formats
×