Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T19:39:59.880Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Constitutions and democratic transitions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 September 2011

Chris Thornhill
Affiliation:
University of Manchester
Get access

Summary

The first wave of transition: constitutional re-foundation after 1945

The period after 1945 witnessed a wave of constitution drafting in many of the states that either converted to fascism in the 1920s or 1930s or were subject to fascist occupation before or during the Second World War. In many instances this process of constitutional reform reflected the extension of Soviet influence across eastern and central Europe, and it was initiated by the government of the Soviet Union. Key examples of constitutions written at this time were the constitution of Hungary of 1949, the constitution of Czechoslovakia of 1948, the Polish constitution of 1952 and the Bulgarian constitution of 1947.

Constitutions reflecting the political dominance of the Soviet Union contained substantial distinctions, and each of them retained elements of indigenous legal culture. However, these constitutions derived some elements from the 1936 constitution of the Soviet Union, and they had important common features. First, they organized the state as a one-party regime committed to a high degree of economic control. Second, they rejected the separation of powers, which was commonly derided in post-1945 eastern Europe as characteristic of bourgeois constitutionalism: they provided for an integrally unified state structure, founded in the notional principle of full popular sovereignty or ‘unitary popular power’ (Skilling 1952: 208), in which both legislative and executive authority was concentrated in a unicameral legislature, dominated by a single (non-elected) party – this effectively tied legislative power to the prerogatives of a party executive.

Type
Chapter
Information
A Sociology of Constitutions
Constitutions and State Legitimacy in Historical-Sociological Perspective
, pp. 327 - 371
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×