Abbott, Andrew. 1988. The System of the Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Abel, Richard L. 1986. “The Transformation of the American Legal Profession.” Law and Society Review 20(1): 7–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Abel, Richard L. 1988. The Legal Profession in England and Wales. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Abel, Richard L. 1989. American Lawyers. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Abel, Richard L. 1995. “What We Talk about when We Talk about Law.” Pp. 1–10 in The Law and Society Reader, ed. Abel, R. L.. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar

Abel, Richard L., and Philip, S. C. Lewis. 1988–1989. Lawyers in Society. 3 vols. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Albonetti, Celesta A. 1999. “The Avoidance of Punishment: A Legal-Bureaucratic Model of Suspended Sentences in Federal White-Collar Cases Prior to the Federal Sentencing Guidelines.” Social Forces 78(1): 303–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Albrow, Martin. 1975. “Legal Positivism and Bourgeois Materialism: Max Weber's View of the Sociology of Law.” British Journal of Law and Society 2(1): 14–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Albrow, Martin. 1996. The Global Age: State and Society beyond Modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Alexander, Jeffrey C. 1983. The Modern Reconstruction of Classical Thought: Talcott Parsons. Theoretical Logic in Sociology, Volume Four. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Alexander, Jeffrey C. 1987. “On the Centrality of the Classics.” Pp. 11–57 in Sociological Theory Today, ed. Giddens, A. and Turner, J.. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Alschuler, Albert W. 2000. Law without Values: The Life, Work, and Legacy of Justice Holmes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Andreski, S. L. 1981. “Understanding, Action and Law in Max Weber.” Pp. 45–66 in Sociological Approaches to Law, ed. Podgórecki, A. and Whelan, C. J.. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar

Andrini, Simona. 2004. “Max Weber's Sociology of Law as a Turning Point of his Methodological Approach.” International Review of Sociology/Revue Internationale de Sociologie 14(2): 143–152.Google Scholar

Anspach, Donald F., and Monsen, S. Henry. 1989. “Determinate Sentencing, Formal Rationality, and Khadi Justice in Maine: An Application of Weber's Typology.” Journal of Criminal Justice 17: 471–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arnaud, André-Jean. 1981. Critique de la raison juridique: Où va la sociologie du droit?Paris: Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique. Online: www.reds.msh-paris.fr/publications/collvir/crj-html/crj.htm.Google Scholar

Arrigo, Bruce A. 2002. Punishing the Mentally Ill: A Critical Analysis of Law and Psychiatry. State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Arrigo, Bruce A., and Williams, Christopher R.. 2000. “The (Im)Possibility of Democratic Justice and the ‘Gift’ of the Majority: On Derrida, Deconstruction, and the Search for Equality.” Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice 16(3): 321–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arrigo, Bruce A., Milovanovic, Dragan, and Robert, C. Schehr. 2000. “The French Connection: Implications for Law, Crime, and Social Justice.” Humanity and Society 24(2): 162–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Atkinson, J. Maxwell. 1981. “Ethnomethodological Approaches to Socio-Legal Studies.” Pp. 201–223 in Sociological Approaches to Law, ed. Podgórecki, A. and Whelan, C. J.. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar

Atkinson, J. Maxwell, and Drew, Paul. 1979. Order in Court: The Organisation of Verbal Interaction in Judicial Settings. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aubert, Vilhelm. 1963. “Researches in the Sociology of Law.” American Behaviour Scientist 7(4): 16–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aubert, Vilhelm, ed. 1969. Sociology of Law: Selected Readings. Baltimore: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Aubert, Vilhelm. 1983. In Search of Law: Sociological Approaches to Law. Totowa, NJ: Barnes & Noble Books.Google Scholar

Auerbach, Carl A. 1966. “Legal Tasks for the Sociologist.” Law and Society Review 1(1): 91–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Austin, Arthur. 2000. “The Postmodern Infiltration of Legal Scholarship.” Review Essay. Michigan Law Review 98(6): 1504–1528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ball, Harry V., Simpson, George Eaton, and Ikeda, Kiyoshi. 1962. “Law and Social Change: Sumner Reconsidered.” American Journal of Sociology 67(5): 532–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Banakar, Reza. 2001. “Integrating Reciprocal Perspectives: On Gurvitch's Theory of Immediate Jural Experience.” Canadian Journal of Law and Society 16: 67–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Banakar, Reza. 2002. “Sociological Jurisprudence.” Pp. 33–44 in An Introduction to Law and Social Theory, ed. Banakar, R. and Travers, M.. Portland, OR: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar

Banakar, Reza. 2003. Merging Law and Sociology: Beyond the Dichotomies in Socio-Legal Research. Glienicke, Berlin: Galda & Wilch Verlag.Google Scholar

Banakar, Reza, and Max Travers. 2002. “Law and Sociology.” Pp. 345–352 in An Introduction to Law and Social Theory, ed. Banakar, R. and Travers, M.. Portland, OR: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar

Bankowski, Zenon, and Mungham, Geoff. 1980. Essays in Law and Society. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Barkan, Steven. 1984. “Legal Control of the Southern Civil Rights Movement.” American Sociological Review 49(4): 552–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baronti, Giancarlo, and Pitch, Tamar. 1978. “Sociology of Law and the Problematic of the Social Sciences in Italy.” Law and Society Review 12(4): 665–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barrett, Jerome T. 2004. A History of Alternative Dispute Resolution: The Story of a Political, Cultural, and Social Movement. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Baum, Karl B. 1967. Leon Petrazycki und seine Schuler. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar

Bauman, Richard W. 1996. Critical Legal Studies: A Guide to the Literature. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Baumgartner, M. P. 2001. “The Sociology of Law in the United States.” The American Sociologist 32(2): 99–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baxi, Upendra. 1974. “Durkheim and Legal Evolution: Some Problems of Disproof.” Comment. Law and Society Review 8(4): 645–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bayley, David H. 1975. “The Police and Political Development in Europe.” Pp. 328–379 in The Formation of National States in Western Europe, ed. Tilly, C.. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Bayley, David H. 2005. Changing the Guard: Developing Democratic Police Abroad. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Beccaria, Cesare. (1764) 1986. On Crimes and Punishments. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing. Online: www.crimetheory.com/Archive/Beccaria/index.html.Google Scholar

Becker, Gary S. 1974. “Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach.” Pp. 1–54 in Essays in the Economics of Crime and Punishment, ed. Becker, G. and Landes, W. M.. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar

Becker, Gary S. 1976. The Economic Approach to Human Behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Becker, Gary S., and William, M. Landes. 1974. Essays in the Economics of Crime and Punishment. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar

Becker, Howard S. 1963. Outsiders: Studies in the Sociology of Deviance. New York: The Free Press of Glencoe.Google Scholar

Becker, Peter, and Wetzell, Richard F., eds. 2006. Criminals and their Scientists: The History of Criminology in International Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beckett, Katherine, and Western, Bruce. 2001. “Governing Social Marginality: Welfare, Incarceration, and the Transformation of State Policy.” Punishment and Society 3(1): 43–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Behrens, Angela, Uggen, Christopher, and Manza, Jeff. 2003. “Ballot Manipulation and the ‘Menace of Negro Domination’: Racial Threat and Felon Disenfranchisement in the United States, 1850–2002.” American Journal of Sociology 109: 559–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beirne, Piers. 1975. “Marxism and the Sociology of Law: Theory or Practice?” British Journal of Law and Society 2(1): 78–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beirne, Piers. 1979a. “Empiricism and the Critique of Marxism on Law and Crime.” Social Problems 26(4): 373–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beirne, Piers. 1979b. “Ideology and Rationality in Max Weber's Sociology of Law.” Pp. 101–131 in Research in Law and Sociology, Vol. II, ed. Spitzer, S.. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar

Beirne, Piers. 1991. “Inventing Criminology: The ‘Science of Man’ in Cesare Beccaria's ‘Dei delitti e delle pene’ (1764).” Criminology 29(4): 777–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beirne, Piers, and Quinney, Richard, eds. 1982. Marxism and Law. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar

Belley, Jean-Guy. 1986. “Georges Gurvitch et les professionnels de la pensée juridique.” Droit et Société 4: 353–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benney, Mark. 1983. “Gramsci on Law, Morality, and Power.” International Journal of the Sociology of Law 11(2): 191–208.Google Scholar

Bentham, Jeremy. (1789) 1970. An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation, ed. Burns, J. H. and Hart, H. L. A.. London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar

Bentham, Jeremy. (1792) 1843. “Truth versus Ashhurst; Or, Law as it is, Contrasted with what it is Said to Be.” Pp. 231–237 in The Works of Jeremy Bentham, Vol. V. Edinburgh: Tait; London: Simpkin, Marshall. Online: www.law.mq.edu.au/Units/law420/LAW203S/Ashhurst.htm.

Berends, Miek. 1992. “An Elusive Profession? Lawyers in Society.” Review Essay. Law and Society Review 26(1): 161–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berger, Peter L., and Luckmann, Thomas. 1967. The Social Construction of Reality. Garden City, NY: Anchor.Google Scholar

Bittner, Egon. 1990. Aspects of Police Work. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar

Black, Donald J. 1972a. “The Boundaries of Legal Sociology.” The Yale Law Journal 81: 1086–1100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Black, Donald J. 1972b. Review of Law, Society, and Industrial Justice, by Philip Selznick. American Journal of Sociology 78(3): 709–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Black, Donald. 1976. The Behavior of Law. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Black, Donald. 1979. “Common Sense in the Sociology of Law.” American Sociological Review 44(1): 18–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Black, Donald. 1980. The Manners and Customs of the Police. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Black, Donald. 1989. Sociological Justice. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Black, Donald. 1995. “The Epistemology of Pure Sociology.” Law and Social Inquiry 20(3): 829–870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Black, Donald. 1997. The Social Structure of Right and Wrong. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Black, Donald. 2000. “Dreams of Pure Sociology.” Sociological Theory 18(3): 343–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Black, Donald. 2002. “The Geometry of Law: An Interview with Donald Black.” International Journal of the Sociology of Law 30(2): 101–129.Google Scholar

Black, Donald. 2007. “Relativity, Legal.” Pp. 1292–1294 in Encyclopedia of Law and Society: American and Global Perspectives, ed. Clark, D. S.. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Blegvad, Britt Mari Persson. 1966. “The Systematic Position of Sociology of Law in Current Scandinavian Research.” Pp. 2–19 in Contributions to the Sociology of Law, ed. Blegvad, B. M. P.. Copenhagen: Munksgaard.Google Scholar

Blumer, Herbert. 1969. Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Boon, Andy. 2005. “Postmodern Professions? The Fragmentation of Legal Education and the Legal Profession.” Journal of Law and Society 32(3): 473–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boucock, Cary. 2000. In the Grip of Freedom: Law and Modernity in Max Weber. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre. 1987. “The Force of the Law: Toward a Sociology of the Juridical Field.” Hastings Law Journal 38(5): 805–853.Google Scholar

Boyle, Elizabeth H. 1998. “Political Frames and Legal Activity: The Case of Nuclear Power in Four Countries.” Law and Society Review 32(1): 141–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boyle, Elizabeth H. 2000. “Is Law the Rule? Using Political Frames to Explain Cross-National Variation in Legal Activity.” Social Forces 79(2): 385–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boyle, Elizabeth H. 2002. Female Genital Cutting: Cultural Conflict in the Global Community. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Boyle, Elizabeth H. 2007. “Globalization – Processes of Legislative.” Pp. 661–665 in Encyclopedia of Law and Society: American and Global Perspectives, ed. Clark, D. S.. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Boyle, Elizabeth H., and John W. Meyer. 2002. “Modern Law as a Secularized and Global Model: Implications for the Sociology of Law.” Pp. 65–95 in Global Prescriptions: The Production, Exportation, and Importation of a New Legal Orthodoxy, ed. Dezalay, Y. and Garth, B. G.. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boyle, Elizabeth H., and Sharon, E. Preves. 2000. “National Politics as International Process: The Case of Anti-Female-Genital-Cutting Laws.” Law and Society Review 34(3): 703–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boyle, Elizabeth H., McMorris, Barbara, and Gómez, Mayra. 2002. “Local Conformity to International Norms: The Case of Female Genital Cutting.” International Sociology 17: 5–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boyle, Elizabeth H., Songora, Fortunata, and Foss, Gail. 2001. “International Discourse and Local Politics: Anti-Female-Genital-Cutting Laws in Egypt, Tanzania, and the United States.” Social Problems 48(4): 524–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Braithwaite, John, and Drahos, Peter. 2000. Global Business Regulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Brand, Arie. 1982. “Against Romanticism: Max Weber and the Historical School of Law.” Australian Journal of Law and Society 1: 87–100.Google Scholar

Brantingham, Paul J., and Kress, Jack M., eds. 1979. Structure, Law, and Power: Essays in the Sociology of Law. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Braybrooke, E. K. 1961. “The Sociological Jurisprudence of Roscoe Pound.” Pp. 57–109 in Studies in the Sociology of Law, ed. Sawer, G.. Canberra: The Australian National University.Google Scholar

Bredemeier, Harry. 1962. “Law as an Integrative Mechanism.” Pp. 73–90 in Law and Sociology, ed. Evan, W. M.. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar

Brickey, Stephen, and Comack, Elizabeth, eds. 1986. The Social Basis of Law: Critical Readings in the Sociology of Law. Ontario, Canada: Garamond Press.Google Scholar

Bridges, George S., and Robert, D. Crutchfield. 1988. “Law, Social Standing and Racial Disparities in Imprisonment.” Social Forces 66(3): 699–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brinton, Mary C., and Nee, Victor, eds. 1998. The New Institutionalism in Sociology. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar

Brittan, Arthur. 1981. “The Symbolic Dimension of Law and Social Control.” Pp. 167–185 in Sociological Approaches to Law, ed. Podgórecki, A. and Whelan, C. J.. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar

Brooker, Penny. 1999. “The ‘Juridification’ of Alternative Dispute Resolution.” Anglo-American Law Review 28(1): 1–36.Google Scholar

Burns, Stacy Lee, ed. 2005. Ethnographies of Law and Social Control. Sociology of Crime, Law and Deviance, Vol. 6. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Burstein, Paul. 1990. “Intergroup Conflict, Law, and the Concept of Labor Market Discrimination.” Sociological Forum 5(3): 459–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burstein, Paul and Monaghan, Kathleen. 1986. “Equal Employment Opportunity and the Mobilization of Law.” Law and Society Review 20(3): 355–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burton, Steven J. 2000. The Path of the Law and its Influence: The Legacy of Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cain, Maureen. 1974. “The Main Themes of Marx' and Engels' Sociology of Law.” British Journal of Law and Society 1(2): 136–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cain, Maureen. 1980. “The Limits of Idealism: Max Weber and the Sociology of Law.” Research in Law and Sociology 3: 53–83.Google Scholar

Cain, Maureen, and Hunt, Alan, eds. 1979. Marx and Engels on Law. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Calavita, Kitty. 2005. Immigrants at the Margins: Law, Race, and Exclusion in Southern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Calavita, Kitty, Dimento, Josephy, Geis, Gilbert, and Forti, Gabrio. 1991. “Dam Disasters and Durkheim: An Analysis of the Theme of Repressive and Restitutive Law.” International Journal of the Sociology of Law 19: 407–426.Google Scholar

Campbell, Anne. 1993. Men, Women and Aggression.New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Campbell, C. M., and Wiles, Paul. 1976. “The Study of Law and Society in Britain.” Law and Society Review 10(4): 547–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Campbell, David. 1986. “Truth Claims and Value-Freedom in the Treatment of Legitimacy: The Case of Weber.” Journal of Law and Society 13(2): 207–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carlen, Pat, ed. 1976. The Sociology of Law. Keele, UK: University of Keele.Google Scholar

Carlin, Jerome E. 1962. Lawyers on their Own: The Solo Practitioner in an Urban Setting. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar

Carruthers, Bruce G., and Terence, C. Halliday. 1998. Rescuing Business: The Making of Corporate Bankruptcy Law in England and the United States. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Carruthers, Bruce G., and Terence, C. Halliday. 2006. “Negotiating Globalization: Global Scripts and Intermediation in the Construction of Asian Insolvency Regimes.” Law and Social Inquiry 31(3): 521–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cartwright, B. C., and Schwartz, R. D.. 1973. “The Invocation of Legal Norms: An Empirical Investigation of Durkheim and Weber.” American Sociological Review 38(3): 340–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carty, Anthony, and Mair, Jane. 1990. “Some Post-Modern Perspectives on Law and Society.” Journal of Law and Society 17(4): 395–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cefaï, Daniel, and Alain, Mahé. 1998. “Échanges rituels de dons, obligation et contrat. Mauss, Davy, Maunier: trois perspectives de sociologie juridique.” L'Année sociologique 48(1): 209–228.Google Scholar

Chambliss, William J. 1964. “A Sociological Analysis of the Law of Vagrancy.” Social Problems 12(1): 67–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chambliss, William J. 1973. “Elites and the Creation of Criminal Law.” Pp. 430–444 in Sociological Readings in the Conflict Perspective, ed. Chambliss, W. J.. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar

Chambliss, William J. 1999. Power, Politics, and Crime. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Chambliss, William J., and Seidman, Robert B.. 1971. Law, Order, and Power. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar

Chazel, Francois. 1991. “Emile Durkheim et l'elaboration d'un ‘programme de recherche’ en sociologie du droit.” Pp. 27–38 in Normes juridiques et régulation sociale, ed. Chazel, F. and Commaille, J.. Paris: Librairie Generale de Droit et de Jurisprudence.Google Scholar

Chilton, Ronald J. 1970. “Social Control through Welfare Legislation: The Impact of a State ‘Suitable Home Law’.” Law and Society Review 5(2): 205–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cicourel, Aaron V. 1968. The Social Organization of Juvenile Justice. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Clarke, A. 1987. “Moral Protest, Status Defense and the Anti-Abortion Campaign.” British Journal of Sociology 38(2): 235–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clarke, Michael. 1976. “Durkheim's Sociology of Law.” British Journal of Law and Society 3: 246–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clifford-Vaughan, Michalina, and Margaret, Scotford-Morton. 1967. “Legal Norms and Social Order: Petrazycki, Pareto, Durkheim.” British Journal of Sociology 18: 269–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coates, Rodney D. 2003. “Law and the Cultural Production of Race and Racialized Systems of Oppression.” American Behavioral Scientist 47(3): 329–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cochez, Caroline. 2004. Le Droit dans l'année sociologique (1896–1925): Contribution a l'etude de la place dur droit dans les premiers temps de l'ecole Durkheimienne. Master's Thesis, Université de Lille, France. Online: edoctorale74.univ-lille2.fr/fileadmin/master_recherche/T_l_chargement/memoires/justice/ cochezc04.pdf.Google Scholar

Cocks, R. C. J. 1988. Sir Henry Maine: A Study in Victorian Jurisprudence. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen, Stanley. 1972. Folk Devils and Moral Panics. London: MacGibbon and Kee.Google Scholar

Cohen, Stanley. 1977. “Prisons and the Future of Control Systems: From Concentration to Dispersal.” Pp. 217–228 in Welfare in Action, ed. Fitzgerald, M. et al. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Cohen, Stanley. 1979. “The Punitive City: Notes on the Dispersal of Social Control.” Contemporary Crises 3(4): 339–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen, Stanley. 1985. Visions of Social Control. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Cole, Stephen, ed. 2001. What's Wrong with Sociology?New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar

Coleman, James. 1990. Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Collins, Hugh. 1982. Marxism and Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Collins, Randall. 1975. Conflict Sociology: Toward an Explanatory Science. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Collins, Randall. 1994. Four Sociological Traditions. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Comack, Elizabeth. 2006. “Theoretical Approaches in the Sociology of Law: Theoretical Excursions.” Pp. 18–67 in Locating Law: Race/Class/Gender/Sexuality Connections, ed. Comack, E.. 2nd edn. Black Point, NS, Canada: Fernwood Publishing.Google Scholar

Cook, K. S., and Whitmeyer, J. M.. 1992. “Two Approaches to Social Structure: Exchange Theory and Network Analysis.” Annual Review of Sociology 18: 109–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coser, Lewis A. 1956. The Functions of Social Conflict. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.Google Scholar

Coser, Lewis A. 1982. “The Notion of Control in Sociological Theory.” Pp. 13–22 in Social Control: Views from the Social Sciences, ed. Gibbs, J. P.. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Cossio, Carlos S. 1952. “Jurisprudence and the Sociology of Law: I & II.” Columbia Law Review 52(3): 356–381; 52(4): 479–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cotterrell, Roger. 1975. “Direction and Development in Anglo-American Jurisprudence and Sociology of Law.” Anglo-American Law Review 4: 386–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cotterrell, Roger. 1977. “Durkheim on Legal Development and Social Solidarity.” British Journal of Law and Society 4(2): 241–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cotterrell, Roger. 1983. “The Sociological Concept of Law.” Journal of Law and Society 10(2): 241–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cotterrell, Roger. 1986. “Law and Sociology: Notes on the Constitution and Confrontations of Disciplines.” Journal of Law and Society 13(1): 9–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cotterrell, Roger. 1990. “Sociology of Law in Britain: Its Development and Present Prospects.” Pp. 779–803 in Developing Sociology of Law: A World-Wide Documentary Enquiry, ed. Ferrari, V.. Milan: Dott A. Giuffré Editore.Google Scholar

Cotterrell, Roger. 1991. “The Durkheimian Tradition in the Sociology of Law.” Review essay. Law and Society Review 25(4): 923–946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cotterrell, Roger. 1992. The Sociology of Law: An Introduction. 2nd edn. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar

Cotterrell, Roger. 1994. Law and Society. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar

Cotterrell, Roger. 1999. Emile Durkheim: Law in a Moral Domain. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Cotterrell, Roger. 2005. “Durkheim's Loyal Jurist? The Sociolegal Theory of Paul Huvelin.” Ratio Juris 18(4): 504–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cotterrell, Roger, ed. 2006. Law in Social Theory. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Cowan, Thomas A. 1968. “Sociological Jurisprudence.” Pp. 335–341 in International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, Vol. VIII, ed. Sills, D. L.. New York: Crowell, Collier and Macmillan, Inc.Google Scholar

Crenshaw, Kimberlé, Gotanda, Neil, Peller, Garry, and Thomas, Kendall, eds. 1995. Critical Race Theory: The Key Writings that Formed the Movement. New York: New Press.Google Scholar

Crone, Patricia. 1999. “Weber, Islamic Law, and the Rise of Capitalism.” Pp. 247–272 in Max Weber and Islam, ed. Huff, T. E. and Schluchter, W.. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar

Cunningham, David. 2004. There's Something Happening Here: The New Left, the Klan, and FBI Counterintelligence. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Currie, Elliott. 1971. “Sociology of Law: The Unasked Questions.” Review Essay. The Yale Law Journal 81: 134–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Damm, Reinhard. 1976. Systemtheorie und Recht: Zur Normentheorie Talcott Parsons. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar

Davies, Celia. 1983. “Professionals in Bureaucracies: The Conflict Thesis Revisited.” Pp. 177–194 in The Sociology of the Professions, ed. Dingwall, R. and Lewis, P.. New York: St. Martin's Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davis, F. James. 1957. “The Treatment of Law in American Sociology.” Sociology and Social Research 42(2): 99–105.Google Scholar

Davis, F. James. 1962. “Law as a Type of Social Control.” Pp. 39–63 in Society and the Law, by Davis, F. J. et al. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar

Davis, F. James, Henry, H. Foster Jr., Ray, C. Jeffrey and Davis, E. Eugene. 1962. Society and the Law. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar

Dawson, Myrna, and Welsh, Sandy. 2005. “Predicting the Quantity of Law: Single versus Multiple Remedies in Sexual Harassment Cases.” Sociological Quarterly 46(4): 699–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Espinosa, Emilio L. 1980. “Social and Legal Order in Sociological Functionalism.” Contemporary Crises 4: 43–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deflem, Mathieu. 1994. “Social Control and the Theory of Communicative Action.” International Journal of the Sociology of Law 22(4): 355–373.Google Scholar

Deflem, Mathieu. 1995. “Théorie du discours, droit pénal, et criminologie.” Déviance et société 19(4): 325–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deflem, Mathieu, ed. 1996. Habermas, Modernity and Law. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Deflem, Mathieu. 1997. “Surveillance and Criminal Statistics: Historical Foundations of Governmentality.” Pp. 149–184 in Studies in Law, Politics and Society, Vol. XVII, ed. Sarat, A. and Silbey, S.. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar

Deflem, Mathieu. 1998a. “The Boundaries of Abortion Law: Systems Theory from Parsons to Luhmann and Habermas.” Social Forces 76(3): 775–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deflem, Mathieu. 1998b. “The Democratic Deficit Revisited: Considering the Politics of Criminal Justice.” Pp. 111–117 in Politique, Police et Justice au Bord du Futur, ed. Cartuyvels, Y. et al. Paris: L'Harmattan.Google Scholar

Deflem, Mathieu. 1999. “Ferdinand Tönnies on Crime and Society: An Unexplored Contribution to Criminological Sociology.” History of the Human Sciences 12(3): 87–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deflem, Mathieu. 2000. “Bureaucratization and Social Control: Historical Foundations of International Policing.” Law and Society Review 34(3): 601–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deflem, Mathieu. 2002. Policing World Society: Historical Foundations of International Police Cooperation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Deflem, Mathieu. 2004. “Social Control and the Policing of Terrorism: Foundations for a Sociology of Counter-Terrorism.” The American Sociologist 35(2): 75–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deflem, Mathieu. 2006a. “Global Rule of Law or Global Rule of Law Enforcement? International Police Cooperation and Counter-Terrorism.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 603: 240–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deflem, Mathieu. 2006b. “Jurisprudencia sociológica y sociología del derecho.” Opinión Jurídica 5(10): 107–119.Google Scholar

Deflem, Mathieu. 2007a. “Legal Profession.” Pp. 2583–2584 in The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology, ed. Ritzer, G.. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar

Deflem, Mathieu. 2007b. “Sociological Theories of Law.” Pp. 1410–1413 in Encyclopedia of Law and Society: American and Global Perspectives, ed. Clark, D. S.. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Deflem, Mathieu. 2007c. “Policing.” Pp. 970–973 in Encyclopedia of Globalization, ed. Scholte, J. A. and Robertson, R.. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Delgado, Richard, and Stefancic, Jean, eds. 2000. Critical Race Theory: The Cutting Edge. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar

Delgado, Richard, and Stefancic, Jean. 2001. Critical Race Theory: An Introduction. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar

Denzin, Norman, K. 1975. “Interaction, Law and Morality: The Contribution of Leon Petrazycki.” Pp. 83–105 in Sociology and Jurisprudence of Leon Petrazycki, ed. Gorecki, J.. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar

Denzin, Norman K. 1986. “Postmodern Social Theory.” Sociological Theory 4(2): 194–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Derrida, Jacques. 1990a. Limited Inc. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar

Derrida, Jacques. 1990b. “Force of Law: The Mystical Foundation of Authority.” Cardozo Law Review 11: 919–1070.Google Scholar

Dezalay, Yves. 1990. “The Big Bang and the Law: The Internationalization and Restructuration of the Legal Field.” Theory, Culture and Society 7: 279–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dezalay, Yves, and Bryant, G. Garth. 1995. “Merchants of Law as Moral Entrepreneurs: Constructing International Justice from the Competition for Transnational Business Disputes.” Law and Society Review 29(1): 27–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dezalay, Yves, and Bryant, G. Garth. 1996. Dealing in Virtue: International Commercial Arbitration and the Construction of a Transnational Legal Order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Dezalay, Yves, and Bryant, G. Garth. 2002a. The Internationalization of Palace Wars: Lawyers, Economists, and the Contest to Transform Latin American States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dezalay, Yves, and Bryant, G. Garth, eds. 2002b. Global Prescriptions: The Production, Exportation, and Importation of a New Legal Orthodoxy. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Didry, Claude. 2000. “La Réforme des groupements professionnels comme expression de la conception Durkheimienne de l'état.” Revue française de sociologie 41(3): 513–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DiMaggio, Paul J., and Walter W. Powell. 1991. “Introduction.” Pp. 1–38 in The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, ed. Powell, W. W. and DiMaggio, P. J.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Dingwall, Robert. 1998. “Empowerment or Enforcement? Some Questions about Power and Control in Divorce Mediation.” Pp. 150–167 in Divorce Mediation and the Legal Process: British Practice and International Experience, ed. Dingwall, R. and Eekelaar, J. M.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dingwall, Robert. 1999. “Professions and Social Order in a Global Society.” International Review of Sociology 9(1): 31–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dingwall, Robert. 2000. “Language, Law, and Power: Ethnomethodology, Conversation Analysis, and the Politics of Law and Society Studies.” Review Essay. Law and Social Inquiry 25(3): 885–911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dingwall, Robert. 2002. “Ethnomethodology and Law.” Pp. 227–244 in An Introduction to Law and Social Theory, ed. Banakar, R. and Travers, M.. Portland, OR: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar

Dingwall, Robert. 2007. “Law, Sociology of.” Pp. 2560–2564 in The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology, ed. Ritzer, G.. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar

Dingwall, Robert, and Eekelaar, J. M.. 1988. “Families and the State: An Historical Perspective on the Public Regulation of Private Conduct.” Law and Policy 10(4): 341–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dingwall, Robert, and Lewis, Philip, eds. 1983. The Sociology of the Professions: Lawyers, Doctors, and Others. New York: St. Martin's Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dixon, Jo. 1995. “The Nexus of Sex, Spousal Violence, and the State.” Review essay. Law and Society Review 29(2): 359–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dixon, Jo, and Seron, Carroll. 1995. “Stratification in the Legal Profession: Sex, Sector, and Salary.” Law and Society Review 29(3): 381–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dobbin, Frank, and Kelly, Erin L.. 2007. “How to Stop Harassment: Professional Construction of Legal Compliance in Organizations.” American Journal of Sociology 112(4): 1203–1243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dobbin, Frank, Sutton, John R., Meyer, John W. and Scott, Richard. 1993. “Equal Opportunity Law and the Construction of Internal Labor Markets.” American Journal of Sociology 99(2): 396–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Donohue, John J. III. 1988. “Law and Economics: The Road Not Taken.” Law and Society Review 22(5): 903–926.Google Scholar

Dowd, Nancy E., and Jacobs, Michelle S., eds. 2003. Feminist Legal Theory: An Anti-Essentialist Reader. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar

Doyle, Daniel P., and Luckenbill, David F.. 1991. “Mobilizing Law in Response to Collective Problems: A Test of Black's Theory of Law.” Law and Society Review 25(1): 103–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Drew, Paul. 1992. “Contested Evidence in Courtroom Cross-Examination: The Case of a Trial for Rape.” Pp. 470–520 in Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings, ed. Drew, P. and Heritage, J.. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Durkheim, Emile. (1893a) 1967. De la division du travail social. Paris: Les Presses Universitaires de France. 8th edn. Online: classiques.uqac.ca/classiques / Durkheim_emile/division_du_travail/division_travail.html.Google Scholar

Durkheim, Emile. (1893b) 1984. The Division of Labor in Society. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar

Durkheim, Emile. (1895) 1982. The Rules of Sociological Method. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar

Durkheim, Emile. (1897) 1951. Suicide: A Study in Sociology. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar

Durkheim, Emile. (1900a) 1922. Leçons de sociologie: Physique des mœurs et du droit. Paris: Les Presses Universitaires de France. Online: classiques.uqac.ca/classiques/Durkheim_emile/lecons_de_sociologie/lecons_de_sociologie.html.Google Scholar

Durkheim, Emile. (1900b) 1992. Professional Ethics and Civic Morals. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Durkheim, Emile. 1901a. “Deux lois de l'evolution pénale.” Année sociologique 4: 65–95. Online: classiques.uqac.ca/classiques/Durkheim_emile/annee_sociologique/an_socio_3/evolution_penale.html.Google Scholar

Durkheim, Emile. (1901b) 1983. “The Evolution of Punishment.” Pp. 102–132 in Durkheim and the Law, ed. Lukes, S. and Scull, A.. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar

Durkheim, Emile. (1912) 1965. The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar

Dwyer, Peter. 2004. “Creeping Conditionality in the UK: From Welfare Rights to Conditional Entitlements?” Canadian Journal of Sociology 29(2): 265–287.Google Scholar

Earl, Jennifer, Soule, Darah A., and McCarthy, John D.. 2003. “Protest under Fire? Explaining the Policing of Protest.” American Sociological Review 68(4): 581–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Easton, Susan, ed. 2008. Marx and Law. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Edelman, Lauren B. 1990. “Legal Environments and Organizational Governance: The Expansion of Due Process in the American Workplace.” American Journal of Sociology 95(6): 1401–1440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edelman, Lauren B. 1992. “Legal Ambiguity and Symbolic Structures: Organizational Mediation of Civil Rights Law.” American Journal of Sociology 97(6): 1531–1576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edelman, Lauren B. 1996. “Introduction to Symposium on the Law and the New Institutionalism.” Studies in Law, Politics, and Society 15(1): 3–7.Google Scholar

Edelman, Lauren B. 2002. “Legality and the Endogeneity of Law.” Pp. 187–202 in Legality and Community: On the Intellectual Legacy of Philip Selznick, ed. Kagan, R. A., Krygier, M., and Winston, K.. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar

Edelman, Lauren B. 2004a. “Rivers of Law and Contested Terrain: A Law and Society Approach to Economic Rationality.” Law and Society Review 38(2): 181–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edelman, Lauren B. 2004b. “The Legal Lives of Private Organizations.” Pp. 231–252 in The Blackwell Companion to Law and Society, ed. Sarat, A.. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Edelman, Lauren B., and Suchman, Mark C.. 1997. “The Legal Environments of Organizations.” Annual Review of Sociology 23: 479–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edelman, Lauren B., and Suchman, Mark C.. 1999. “When the ‘Haves’ Hold Court: Speculations on the Organizational Internalization of Law.” Law and Society Review 33(4): 941–991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edelman, Lauren B., and Robin Stryker. 2005. “A Sociological Approach to Law and the Economy.” Pp. 527–551 in The Handbook of Economic Sociology, ed. Smelser, N. and Princeton, R. Swedberg, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Edelman, Lauren B., Erlanger, Howard S., and Lande, John. 1993. “Internal Dispute Resolution: The Transformation of Civil Rights in the Workplace.” Law and Society Review 27(3): 497–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edelman, Lauren B., Uggen, Christopher, and Erlanger, Howard S.. 1999. “The Endogeneity of Legal Regulation: Grievance Procedures as Rational Myth.” American Journal of Sociology 105(2): 406–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edwards, Mark Evan. 1996. “Pregnancy Discrimination Litigation: Legal Erosion of Capitalist Ideology under Equal Employment Opportunity Law.” Social Forces 75(1): 247–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ehrlich, Eugen. (1913a) 1967. Grundlegung der Soziologie des Rechts. 3rd edn. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar

Ehrlich, Eugen. (1913b) 1962. Fundamental Principles of the Sociology of Law. New York: Russell & Russell.Google Scholar

Ehrlich, Eugen. 1916. “Montesquieu and Sociological Jurisprudence.” Harvard Law Review 29(6): 582–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ehrlich, Eugen. 1922. “The Sociology of Law.” Harvard Law Review 36(2): 130–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ellickson, Robert C. 1991. Order without Law: How Neighbors Settle Disputes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Ellickson, Robert C. 2001. “The Evolution of Social Norms: A Perspective from the Legal Academy.” Pp. 35–75 in Social Norms, ed. Hechter, M. and Opp, K.. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar

Emerson, Richard M. 1976. “Social Exchange Theory.” Annual Review of Sociology 2: 335–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Engen, Rodney L., and Gainey, Randy R.. 2000. “Modeling the Effects of Legally Relevant and Extralegal Factors under Sentencing Guidelines: The Rules have Changed.” Criminology 38(4): 1207–1230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Engen, Rodney L., and Steen, Sara. 2000. “The Power to Punish: Discretion and Sentencing Reform in the War on Drugs.” American Journal of Sociology 105(5): 1357–1395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Engen, Rodney L., Gainey, Randy R., Crutchfield, Robert D., and Weis, Joseph G.. 2002. “Discretion and Disparity under Sentencing Guidelines: The Role of Departures and Structured Sentencing Alternatives.” Criminology 41(1): 99–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ermakoff, Ivan. 1997. “Prelates and Princes: Aristocratic Marriages, Canon Law Prohibitions, and Shifts in Norms and Patterns of Domination in the Central Middle Ages.” American Sociological Review 62(3): 405–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Evan, William M. 1959. “Power, Bargaining, and Law: A Preliminary Analysis of Labor Arbitration Cases.” Social Problems 7(1): 4–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Evan, William M. 1960. “Value Conflicts in the Law of Evidence.” The American Behavioral Scientist 4(3): 23–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Evan, William M. 1961. “Organization Man and Due Process of Law.” American Sociological Review 26(4): 540–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Evan, William M., ed. 1962a. Law and Sociology: Exploratory Essays. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar

Evan, William M. 1962b. “Due Process of Law in Military and Industrial Organizations.” Administrative Science Quarterly 7(2): 187–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Evan, William M. 1965. “Law as an Instrument of Social Change.” Pp. 285–293 in Applied Sociology: Opportunities and Problems, ed. Gouldner, A. W. and Miller, S. M.. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Evan, William M., ed. 1980. The Sociology of Law: A Social-Structural Perspective. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Evan, William M. 1990. Social Structure and Law: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Evan, William M. 1991. “Law and Society.” Pp. 1075–1086 in Encyclopedia of Sociology, ed. Borgatta, E. F. and Borgatta, M. L.. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Evan, William M., and Levin, Ezra. 1966. “Status-Set and Role-Set Conflicts of the Stockbroker: A Problem in the Sociology of Law.” Social Forces 45(1): 73–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ewick, Patricia. 2004. “Consciousness and Ideology.” Pp. 80–94 in The Blackwell Companion to Law and Society, ed. Sarat, A.. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Ewick, Patricia, and Silbey, Susan S.. 1995. “Subversive Stories and Hegemonic Tales: Toward a Sociology of Narrative.” Law and Society Review 29(2): 197–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ewick, Patricia, and Silbey, Susan S.. 1998. The Common Place of Law: Stories from Everyday Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Ewick, Patricia, and Silbey, Susan S.. 2003. “Subversive Stories and Hegemonic Tales: Toward a Sociology of Narrative.” American Journal of Sociology 108(6): 1328–1372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ewing, Sally. 1987. “Formal Justice and the Spirit of Capitalism: Max Weber's Sociology of Law.” Law and Society Review 21(3): 487–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Featherstone, Richard. 2005. Narratives from the 1971 Attica Prison Riots: Toward a New Theory of Correctional Disturbances. Lewiston, NY: The Edwin Mellen Press.Google Scholar

Feeley, Malcolm M. 1979. The Process is the Punishment: Handling Cases in a Lower Criminal Court. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar

Fegan, Eileen V., and Rebouche, Rachel. 2003. “Northern Ireland's Abortion Law: The Morality of Silence and the Censure of Agency.” Feminist Legal Studies 11(3): 221–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feldman, Stephen M. 1991. “An Interpretation of Max Weber's Theory of Law: Metaphysics, Economics, and the Iron Cage of Constitutional Law.” Law and Social Inquiry 16(2): 205–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feldman, Stephen M. 1996 “The Politics of Postmodern Jurisprudence.” Michigan Law Review 95(1): 166–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Felson, Richard B. 2006. “Is Violence against Women about Women or about Violence?” Contexts 5(2): 21–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ferrari, Vincenzo, ed. 1990. Developing a Sociology of Law: A World-Wide Documentary Enquiry. Milan: Dott A. Giuffrè Editore.Google Scholar

Ferrari, Vincenzo. 1989. “Sociology of Law: A Theoretical Introduction.” Pp. 7–35 in Two Lectures on the Sociology of Law, by Ferrari, V. and Uusitalo, P.. Helsinki, Finland: University of Helsinki.Google Scholar

Ferrari, Vincenzo and Ronfani, Paola. 2001. “A Deeply Rooted Scientific Discipline: Origins and Development of Sociology of Law in Italy.” The American Sociologist 32(2): 61–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ferrell, Jeff. 1993. Crimes of Style: Urban Graffiti and the Politics of Criminality. New York: Garland.Google Scholar

Fielding, Nigel G. 2002. “Theorizing Community Policing.” British Journal of Criminology 42(1): 147–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fielding, Nigel G. 2005. “Concepts and Theory in Community Policing.” Howard Journal of Criminal Justice 44(5): 460–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fine, Robert. 2002. “Marxism and the Social Theory of Law.” Pp. 101–117 in An Introduction to Law and Social Theory, ed. Banakar, R. and Travers, M.. Portland, OR: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar

Fitzpatrick, Peter, and Hunt, Alan, eds. 1987. Critical Legal Studies. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Fletcher, Ruth. 2002. “Feminist Legal Theory.” Pp. 135–154 in An Introduction to Law and Social Theory, ed. Banakar, R. and Travers, M.. Portland, OR: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar

Flood, John. 2002. “Globalisation and Law.” Pp. 311–328 in An Introduction to Law and Social Theory, ed. Banakar, R. and Travers, M.. Portland, OR: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel. (1975) 1977. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel. (1978a) 1991. “Governmentality.” Pp. 87–104 in The Foucault Effect, ed. Burchell, G., Gordon, C., and Miller, P.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel. (1978b) 1989. “Sécurité, territoire, et populations.” Pp. 99–106 in his Résumé des cours, 1970–1982. Paris: Julliard.Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel. 1980. Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, ed. Gordon, C.. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel. 1981. “Omnes et Singulatim: Towards a Criticism of ‘Political Reason’.” Pp. 223–254 in The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, Vol. II, ed. McMurrin, S. M.. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.Google Scholar

Frank, Nancy. 1983. “From Criminal to Civil Penalties in the History of Health and Safety Laws.” Social Problems 30(5): 532–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Freeman, Michael, ed. 2006. Law and Sociology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Freidson, Eliot. 1984. “The Changing Nature of Professional Control.” Annual Review of Sociology 10: 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Freidson, Eliot. 1986. Professional Powers: A Study of the Institutionalization of Formal Knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Freidson, Eliot. 2001. Professionalism, the Third Logic: On the Practice of Knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Friedman, Lawrence M. 1976. Law and Society: An Introduction. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Friedrichs, David O. 2001. Law in our Lives: An Introduction. Los Angeles: Roxbury.Google Scholar

Frymer, Paul, and Skrentny, John D.. 2004. “The Rise of Instrumental Affirmative Action: Law and the New Significance of Race in America.” Connecticut Law Review 36: 677–723.Google Scholar

Fuchs, Stephan, and Ward, Steven. 1994. “What is Deconstruction, and Where and When Does it Take Place? Making Facts in Science, Building Cases in Law.” American Sociological Review 59(4): 481–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fuller, Lon L. 1964. The Morality of Law. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Fuller, Lon L. 1968. “Some Unexplored Social Dimensions of the Law.” Pp. 57–70 in The Path of the Law from 1967, ed. Sutherland, A. E.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Fuszara, Malgorzata. 1990. “Sociology of Law in Poland.” Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie 11(1): 42–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Galanter, Marc. 1974. “Why the ‘Haves’ Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change.” Law and Society Review 9(1): 95–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Galanter, Marc. 2004. “The Vanishing Trial: An Examination of Trials and Related Matters in Federal and State Courts.” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 1(3): 459–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Galanter, Marc, and Palay, Thomas. 1991. Tournament of Lawyers: The Transformation of the Big Law Firm. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Galligan, Dennis J. 2007. Law in Modern Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Galliher, John F., and Cross, John R.. 1983. Morals Legislation without Morality: The Case of Nevada. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar

Garcia-Vellegas, Mauricio. 2006. “Comparative Sociology of Law: Legal Fields, Legal Scholarships, and Social Sciences in Europe and the United States.” Law and Social Inquiry 31(2): 343–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Garfinkel, Harold. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Garland, David. 1983. “Durkheim's Theory of Punishment: A Critique.” Pp. 37–61 in The Power to Punish: Contemporary Penality and Social Analysis, ed. Garland, D. and Young, P.. London: Heinemann Educational Books.Google Scholar

Garland, David. 1985. Punishment and Welfare: A History of Penal Strategies. Brookfield, VT: Gower.Google Scholar

Garland, David. 1991a. “Sociological Perspectives on Punishment.” Crime and Justice 14: 115–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Garland, David. 1991b. “Punishment and Culture: The Symbolic Dimensions of Criminal Justice.” Pp. 191–222 in Studies in Law, Politics and Society, Vol. XI, ed. Sarat, A. and Silbey, S.. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar

Garland, David. 1997. “ ‘Governmentality’ and the Problem of Crime: Foucault, Criminology, Sociology.” Theoretical Criminology 1(2): 173–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Garland, David. 2002. The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Garland, David. 2006. “Concepts of Culture in the Sociology of Punishment.” Theoretical Criminology 10(4): 419–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Garth, Bryant, and Sterling, Joyce. 1998. “From Legal Realism to Law and Society: Reshaping Law for the Last Stages of the Social Activist State.” Law and Society Review 32(2): 409–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gates, E. Nathaniel, ed. 1997. The Judicial Isolation of the “Racially” Oppressed. New York: Garland.Google Scholar

Geiger, Theodor. 1920. Das uneheliche Kind und seine Mutter im Recht des neuen Staates: Ein Versuch auf der Basis kritischer Rechtsvergleichung. Münich-Berlin-Leipzig: Schweitzer.Google Scholar

Geiger, Theodor. (1946) 1979. Über Moral und Recht. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar

Geiger, Theodor. (1947) 1964. Vorstudien zu einer Soziologie des Rechts. Neuwied am Rhein: Luchterhand.Google Scholar

Geiger, Theodor. 1969. On Social Order and Mass Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Geis, Gilbert. 1959. “Sociology, Criminology, and Criminal Law.” Social Problems 7(1): 40–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gephart, Werner. 1993. Gesellschaftstheorie und Recht: Das Recht im soziologischen Diskurs der Moderne. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Gessner, Volkmar. 1995. “Global Approaches in the Sociology of Law: Problems and Challenges.” Journal of Law and Society 22(1): 85–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gibbs, Jack P. 1966. “The Sociology of Law and Normative Phenomena.” American Sociological Review 31(3): 315–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gibbs, Jack P. 1968. “Definitions of Law and Empirical Questions.” Law and Society Review 2(3): 429–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gibbs, Jack P. 2003. “A Formal Restatement of Durkheim's ‘Division of Labor’ Theory.” Sociological Theory 21(2): 103–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gillin, John Lewis. 1929. “New Developments in the Departments of Sociology in Relation to Courses in the Law School.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 145: 125–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gilliom, John. 1994. Surveillance, Privacy, and the Law: Employee Drug Testing and the Politics of Social Control. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldberg, Chad A. 2001. “Social Citizenship and a Reconstructed Tocqueville.” American Sociological Review 66(2): 289–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goode, Erich. 1996. Social Deviance. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar

Goode, Erich, and Ben-Yehuda, Nachman. 1994. Moral Panics: The Social Construction of Deviance. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Gordon, Robert W. 1986. “Critical Legal Studies.” Legal Studies Forum 10(3): 335–340.Google Scholar

Gordon, Robert W. 1992. The Legacy of Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Gorecki, , Jan, , ed. 1975a. Sociology and Jurisprudence of Leon Petrazycki. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar

Gorecki, Jan. 1975b. “Leon Petrazycki.” Pp. 1–15 in Sociology and Jurisprudence of Leon Petrazycki, ed. Gorecki, J.. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar

Gorman, Elizabeth H. 1999. “Moving away from ‘Up or Out’: Determinants of Permanent Employment in Law Firms.” Law and Society Review 33(3): 637–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gorman, Elizabeth H. 2005. “Gender Stereotypes, Same-Gender Preferences, and Organizational Variation in the Hiring of Women: Evidence from Law Firms.” American Sociological Review 70: 702–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gorman, Elizabeth H. 2006. “Work Uncertainty and the Promotion of Professional Women: The Case of Law Firm Partnership.” Social Forces 85(2): 865–888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gottfredson, Michael, and Hindelang, Michael J.. 1979a. “A Study of the Behavior of Law.” American Sociological Review 44(1): 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gottfredson, Michael, and Hindelang, Michael J.. 1979b. “Theory and Research in the Sociology of Law.” American Sociological Review 44(1): 27–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gould, Mark. 1993. “Legitimation and Justification: The Logic of Moral and Contractual Solidarity in Weber and Durkheim.” Pp. 205–225 in Current Perspectives in Social Theory, Vol. XIII, ed. Agger, B.. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar

Gouldner, Alvin W. 1970. The Coming Crisis of Western Sociology. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Grace, Clive and Wilkinson, Philip. 1978. Sociological Inquiry and Legal Phenomena. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar

Grana, Sheryl J., Jane, C. Ollenburger and Nicholas, Mark. 2002. The Social Context of Law. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Grattet, Ryken, Jenness, Valerie, and Curry, Theodore R.. 1998. “The Homogenization and Differentiation of Hate Crime Law in the United States, 1978 to 1995: Innovation and Diffusion in the Criminalization of Bigotry.” American Sociological Review 63(2): 286–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grazin, Igor. 2004. “On Myth, Considered as a Method for Legal Thought.” Law and Critique 15(2): 159–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greatbatch, David, and Robert Dingwall. 1994. “Divorce Mediation: The Virtues of Formality?” Pp. 391–399 in Oxford Readings in Socio-Legal Studies: Family Law, ed. Eekelaar, J. M. and Maclean, M.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Greatbatch, David, and Dingwall, Robert. 1997. “Argumentative Talk in Divorce Mediation Sessions.” American Sociological Review 62(1): 151–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greenberg, David F. 1983. “Donald Black's Sociology of Law: A Critique.” Law and Society Review 17(2): 337–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Griffiths, Anne. 2002. “Legal Pluralism.” Pp. 289–310 in An Introduction to Law and Social Theory, ed. Banakar, R. and Travers, M.. Portland, OR: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar

Griffiths, John. 1995. “Legal Pluralism and the Theory of Legislation, with Special Reference to the Regulation of Euthanasia.” Pp. 201–234 in Legal Polycentricity: Consequences of Pluralism in Law, ed. Petersen, H. and Zahle, H.. Aldershot, UK: Dartmouth.Google Scholar

Griffiths, John. 1998. “The Slippery Slope: Are the Dutch Sliding Down or Are They Clambering Up?” Pp. 93–104 in Asking to Die: Inside the Dutch Debate about Euthanasia, ed. Thomasma, et al D. C.. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Griffiths, John. 1999. “Legal Knowledge and the Social Working of Law: The Case of Euthanasia.” Pp. 81–108 in Semiotics and Legislation: Jurisprudential, Institutional and Sociological Perspectives, ed. Schooten, H.. Liverpool, UK: Deborah Charles Publications.Google Scholar

Griffiths, John. 2006. “The Idea of Sociology of Law and its Relation to Law and to Sociology.” Pp. 49–68 in Law and Sociology, ed. Freeman, M.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Griffiths, John, Weyers, Heleen, and Blood, Alex. 1998. Euthanasia and Law in the Netherlands. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grodnick, Stephen. 2005. “Rediscovering Radical Democracy in Habermas's Between Facts and Norms.” Constellations 12(3): 392–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guibentif, Pierre. 2002. “The Sociology of Law as a Sub-discipline of Sociology.” Portuguese Journal of Social Science 1(3): 175–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gurvitch, Georges. 1940. Éléments de sociologie juridique. Paris: Éditions Aubier Montaigne.Google Scholar

Gurvitch, Georges. 1941a. “Major Problems of the Sociology of Law.” Journal of Social Philosophy 6(3): 197–215.Google Scholar

Gurvitch, Georges. 1941b. “The Problem of Social Law.” Ethics 52(1): 17–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gurvitch, Georges. 1942. Sociology of Law. New York: Philosophical Library.Google Scholar

Gusfield, Joseph R. 1963. Symbolic Crusade: Status Politics and the American Temperance Movement. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. (1981a) 1988. Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. 2 vols. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. (1981b) 1984. The Theory of Communicative Action Volume 1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. (1981c) 1987. The Theory of Communicative Action Volume 2: System and Lifeworld: A Critique of Functionalist Reason. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. 1983a. Moralbewußtsein und kommunikatives Handeln. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. (1983b) 1992. Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. 1988. “Law and Morality.” Pp. 215–279 in The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, ed. McMurrin, S. M.. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. 1990. “Remarks on the Discussion.” Theory, Culture and Society 7: 127–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. (1991) 1993. Justification and Application: Remarks on Discourse Ethics. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. 1992a. Faktizität und Geltung. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. (1992b) 1996. Between Facts and Norms. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. 1995. “On the Internal Relation between the Rule of Law and Democracy.” European Journal of Philosophy 3: 12–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hagan, John. 1980. “The Legislation of Crime and Delinquency: A Review of Theory, Method, and Research.” Law and Society Review 14(3): 603–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hagan, John. 1990. “The Gender Stratification of Income Inequality Among Lawyers.” Social Forces 68(3): 835–855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hagan, John. 2003. Justice in the Balkans: Prosecuting War Crimes in the Hague Tribunal. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hagan, John, and Greer, Scott. 2002. “Making War Criminal.” Criminology 40(2): 231–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hagan, John, and Kay, Fiona M.. 1995. Gender in Practice: A Study of Lawyers' Lives. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hagan, John, and Kay, Fiona M.. 2007. “Even Lawyers Get the Blues: Gender, Depression, and Job Satisfaction in Legal Practice.” Law and Society Review 41(1): 51–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hagan, John, and Kutnjak Ivkovic, Sanja. 2006. “War Crimes, Democracy, and the Rule of Law in Belgrade, the Former Yugoslavia, and Beyond.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 605: 130–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hagan, John and Leon, Jeffrey. 1977. “Rediscovering Delinquency: Social History, Political Ideology and the Sociology of Law.” American Sociological Review 42(4): 587–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hagan, John, and Levi, Ron. 2004. “Social Skill, the Milosevic Indictment, and the Rebirth of International Criminal Justice.” European Journal of Criminology 1(4): 445–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hagan, John, and Levi, Ron. 2005. “Crimes of War and the Force of Law.” Social Forces 83(4): 1499–1534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hagan, John, Schoenfeld, Heather, and Palloni, Alberto. 2006. “The Science of Human Rights, War Crimes, and Humanitarian Emergencies.” Annual Review of Sociology 32: 329–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hagan, John, Zatz, Marjorie, Arnold, Bruce, and Kay, Fiona M.. 1991. “Cultural Capital, Gender, and the Structural Transformation of Legal Practice.” Law and Society Review 25(2): 239–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hall, Stuart, Critcher, Charles, Jefferson, Tony, Clarke, John, and Brian, Robert. 1978. Policing the Crisis: Mugging, the State, and Law and Order. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Halliday, Terence C. 1983. “Professions, Class and Capitalism.” European Journal of Sociology 24(2): 321–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Halliday, Terence C. 1985. “Knowledge Mandates: Collective Influence by Scientific, Normative and Syncretic Professions.” British Journal of Sociology 36: 421–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Halliday, Terence C. 1986. “Six Score Years and Ten: Demographic Transitions in the American Legal Profession, 1850–1980.” Law and Society Review 20(1): 53–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Halliday, Terence C. 1987. Beyond Monopoly: Lawyers, State Crises and Professional Empowerment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Halliday, Terence C., and Carruthers, Bruce G.. 2007. “The Recursivity of Law: Global Norm-Making and National Law-Making in the Globalization of Corporate Insolvency Regimes.” American Journal of Sociology 112(4): 1135–1202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Halliday, Terence C., and Osinsky, Pavel. 2006. “Globalization of Law.” Annual Review of Sociology 32: 447–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hawkins, Keith. 2003. Law as Last Resort: Prosecution Decision-Making in a Regulatory Agency. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hechter, Michael, and Kanazawa, Satoshi. 1997. “Sociological Rational Choice Theory.” Annual Review of Sociology 23: 191–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hedström, Peter, and Swedberg, Richard. 1996. “Rational Choice, Empirical Research, and the Sociological Tradition.” European Sociological Review 12(2): 127–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heidegren, Carl-Goran. 1997. “Transcendental Theory of Society, Anthropology and the Sociology of Law: Helmut Schelsky – An Almost Forgotten Sociologist.” Acta Sociologica 40(3): 279–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heimer, Carol A. 1999. “Competing Institutions: Law, Medicine, and Family in Neonatal Intensive Care.” Law and Society Review 33(1): 17–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heimer, Carol A. 2001. “Law: New Institutionalism.” Pp. 8534–8538 in International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, ed. Smelser, N. J. and Bates, P. B.. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Heimer, Carol A., and Staffen, Lisa R.. 1998. For the Sake of the Children: The Social Organization of Responsibility in the Hospital and the Home. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Heinz, John P., and Laumann, Edward O.. 1982. Chicago Lawyers: The Social Structure of the Bar. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar

Heinz, John P., Laumann, Edward O., Nelson, Robert L., and Michelson, Ethan. 1998. “The Changing Character of Lawyers' Work: Chicago in 1975 and 1995.” Law and Society Review 32(4): 751–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heinz, John P., Nelson, Robert L., and Laumann, Edward O.. 2001. “The Scale of Justice: Observations on the Transformation of Urban Law Practice.” Annual Review of Sociology 27(1): 337–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heinz, John P., Nelson, Robert L., Sandefur, Rebecca L., and Laumann, Edward O.. 2005. Urban Lawyers: The New Social Structure of the Bar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Hembroff, Larry A. 1987. “The Seriousness of Acts and Social Contexts: A Test of Black's Theory of the Behavior of Law.” American Journal of Sociology 93(2): 322–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Henry, Stuart. 1983. Private Justice: Towards Integrated Theorising in the Sociology of Law. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Henry, Stuart, and Milovanovic, Dragan. 1996. Constitutive Criminology: Beyond Postmodernism. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Henry, Stuart, and Milovanovic, Dragan, eds. 1999. Constitutive Criminology at Work: Applications to Crime and Justice. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Hiday, Virginia A. 1983. “Sociology of Mental Health Law.” Sociology and Social Research 67(2): 111–128.Google Scholar

Hirst, Paul Q. 1972. “Marx and Engels on Law, Crime, and Morality.” Economy and Society 1(1): 28–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hirst, Paul Q. 1986. Law, Socialism, and Democracy. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar

Hoekema, Andre Jan. 1985. “Dutch Trends in the Sociology of Law in the Past Two Decades.” The Netherlands Journal of Sociology 2(1): 32–49.Google Scholar

Hoffmann, Elizabeth A. 2003. “Legal Consciousness and Dispute Resolution: Different Disputing Behavior at Two Similar Taxicab Companies.” Law and Social Inquiry 28(3): 691–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoffmann, Elizabeth A. 2005. “Dispute Resolution in a Worker Cooperative: Formal Procedures and Procedural Justice.” Law and Society Review 39: 51–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoffmann, Elizabeth A. 2006. “Exit and Voice: Job Loyalty and Dispute Resolution Choices.” Social Forces 84(4): 2313–2330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hollinger, Richard C., and Lanza-Kaduce, Lonn. 1988. “The Process of Criminalization: The Case of Computer Crime Laws.” Criminology 26(1): 101–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holmes, Oliver Wendell. (1881) 1923. The Common Law. Boston: Little, Brown, and Company.Google Scholar

Holmes, Oliver Wendell. 1897. “The Path of the Law.” Harvard Law Review 110(5): 991–1009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holmes, Oliver Wendell. 1899. “Law in Science and Science in Law.” Harvard Law Review 12(7): 443–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holmes, Oliver Wendell. 1918. “Natural Law.” Harvard Law Review 32(1): 40–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Homans, George C. 1958. “Social Behavior as Exchange.” American Journal of Sociology 63(6): 597–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Homans, George C. 1961. Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.Google Scholar

Homans, George C. 1964. “Bringing Men Back in.” American Sociological Review 29(6): 809–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoogvelt, Ankie. 1984. “Jurisprudence, Sociological.” P. 180 in The International Encyclopedia of Sociology, ed. Mann, M.. New York: The Continuum Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Hopkins, Andrew. 1975. “On the Sociology of Criminal Law.” Social Problems 22(5): 608–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Horne, Christine. 2000. “Community and the State: The Relationship between Normative and Legal Controls.” European Sociological Review 16: 225–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Horne, Christine. 2004. “Collective Benefits, Exchange Interests, and Norm Enforcement.” Social Forces 82(3): 1037–1062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Horne, Christine, and Lovaglia, Michael J.. 2008. Experiments in Criminology and Law: A Research Revolution. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Horowitz, Irving L. 1993. The Decomposition of Sociology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Horwitz, Allan V. 1983. “Resistance to Innovation in the Sociology of Law: A Response to Greenberg.” Law and Society Review 17(2): 369–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Horwitz, Allan V. 2002. “A Continuities Symposium on Donald Black's ‘The Behavior of Law’.” Contemporary Sociology 31(6): 641–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hull, Kathleen E. 1999. “The Paradox of the Contented Female Lawyer.” Law and Society Review 33(3): 687–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hull, Kathleen E. 2001. “The Political Limits of the Rights Frame: The Case of Same-Sex Marriage in Hawaii.” Sociological Perspectives 44(2): 207–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hull, Kathleen E. 2003. “The Cultural Power of Law and the Cultural Enactment of Legality: The Case of Same-Sex Marriage.” Law and Social Inquiry 28(3): 629–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hull, Kathleen E. 2006. Same-Sex Marriage: The Cultural Politics of Love and Law. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hull, Kathleen E., and Nelson, Robert L.. 2000. “Assimilation, Choice or Constraint? Testing Theories of Gender Difference in the Careers of Lawyers.” Social Forces 79(1): 229–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hull, N. E. H. 1997. Roscoe Pound and Karl Llewellyn: Searching for an American Jurisprudence. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Hunt, Alan J. 1976. “Perspectives in the Sociology of Law.” Pp. 22–44 in The Sociology of Law, ed. Carlen, P. Keele, UK: University of Keele.Google Scholar

Hunt, Alan J. 1978. The Sociological Movement in Law. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hunt, Alan J. 1979. “The Sociology of Law of Gurvitch and Timasheff: A Critique of Theories of Normative Integration.” Research in Law and Sociology 2: 169–204.Google Scholar

Hunt, Alan J. 1980. “The Radical Critique of Law: An Assessment.” International Journal of the Sociology of Law 8(1): 33–46.Google Scholar

Hunt, Alan J. 1981a. “Dichotomy and Contradiction in the Sociology of Law.” British Journal of Law and Society 8(1): 47–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hunt, Alan J. 1981b. “Marxism and the Analysis of Law.” Pp. 91–109 in Sociological Approaches to Law, ed. Podgórecki, A. and Whelan, C. J.. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar

Hunt, Alan J. 1983. “Behavioral Sociology of Law: A Critique of Donald Black.” Journal of Law and Society 10(1): 19–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hunt, Alan J. 1985. “The Ideology of Law: Advances and Problems in Recent Applications of the Concept of Ideology to the Analysis of Law.” Law and Society Review 19(1): 11–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hunt, Alan J. 1986. “The Theory of Critical Legal Studies.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 6(1): 1–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hunt, Alan J. 1993. Explorations in Law and Society: Toward a Constitutive Theory of Law. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Hunt, Alan J. 1995. “The Role of Law in the Civilizing Process and the Reform of Popular Culture.” Canadian Journal of Law and Society 10(2): 5–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hunt, Alan J. 1997. “Law, Politics and the Social Sciences.” Pp. 103–123 in Sociology after Postmodernism, ed. Owen, D.. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Hunt, Alan J. 2001. “Introduction to the Transaction Edition.” Pp. XI–LIV in Sociology of Law, by Gurvitch, Georges. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar

Hunt, Alan J. 2002. “The Problematisation of Law in Classical Social Theory.” Pp. 13–31 in An Introduction to Law and Social Theory, ed. Banakar, R. and Travers, M.. Portland, OR: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar

Hunt, Alan J., and Wickham, Gary. 1994. Foucault and Law. Towards a Sociology of Law as Governance. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar

Hutter, Bridget M. 1988. The Reasonable Arm of the Law? The Law Enforcement Procedures of Environmental Health Officers. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Hyden, Hakan. 1986. “Sociology of Law in Scandinavia.” Journal of Law and Society 13(1): 131–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ingersoll, David E. 1981. “American Legal Realism and Sociological Jurisprudence: The Methodological Roots of a Science of Law.” Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 17(4): 490–503.3.0.CO;2-A>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Irons, Peter. 1986. “Humanistic Legal Studies.” Legal Studies Forum 10(3): 331–334.Google Scholar

Irwin, Michael John. 1986. A Sociological Evaluation of the Development of Sociology of Law. New York, NY: Vantage Press.Google Scholar

Jacobs, David, and O'Brien, Robert M.. 1998. “The Determinants of Deadly Force: A Structural Analysis of Police Violence.” American Journal of Sociology 103(4): 837–862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jenkins, Philip. 1998. Moral Panic: Changing Concepts of the Child Molester in Modern America. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Jenness, Valerie. 1999. “Managing Differences and Making Legislation: Social Movements and the Racialization, Sexualization, and Gendering of Federal Hate Crime Law in the U.S., 1985–1998.” Social Problems 46(4): 548–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jenness, Valerie. 2004. “Explaining Criminalization: From Demography and Status Politics to Globalization and Modernization.” Annual Review of Sociology 30: 147–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jenness, Valerie, and Grattet, Ryken. 1996. “The Criminalization of Hate: A Comparison of Structural and Polity Influences on the Passage of ‘Bias-Crime’ Legislation in the United States.” Sociological Perspectives 39(1): 129–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnson, Harry M., ed. 1978. Social System and Legal Process. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Johnston, Barry V. 1989. “Sorokin Lives! Centennial Observations.” Footnotes, The ASA Newsletter, 17(1): 1, 5.Google Scholar

Johnston, . 1992. The Rebirth of Private Policing.New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Jones, Ann. 1994. Next Time, She'll Be Dead: Battering and How to Stop it. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar

Justo, Marcelo Gomes, and Singer, Helena. 2001. “Sociology of Law in Brazil: A Critical Approach.” The American Sociologist 32(2): 10–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kagan, Robert A., Krygier, Martin, and Winston, Kenneth, eds. 2002. Legality and Community: On the Intellectual Legacy of Philip Selznick. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. 1784. “Beantwortung der Frage: Was ist Aufklärung?” Berlinische Monatsschrift 4: 481–494.Google Scholar

Kay, Fiona M. 1997. “Flight from Law: A Competing Risks Model of Departures from Law Firms.” Law and Society Review 31(2): 301–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kay, Fiona M. 2002. “Crossroads to Innovation and Diversity: The Careers of Women Lawyers in Quebec.” McGill Law Journal 47(4): 699–742.Google Scholar

Kay, Fiona M., and Brockman, Joan. 2000. “Barriers to Gender Equality in the Canadian Legal Establishment.” Feminist Legal Studies 8(2): 169–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kay, Fiona M., and Hagan, John. 1995. “The Persistent Glass Ceiling: Gendered Inequalities in the Earnings of Lawyers.” British Journal of Sociology 46(2): 279–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kay, Fiona M., and Hagan, John. 1998. “Raising the Bar: The Gender Stratification of Law-Firm Capital.” American Sociological Review 63(5): 728–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kay, Fiona M., and Hagan, John. 1999. “Cultivating Clients in the Competition for Partnership: Gender and the Organizational Restructuring of Law Firms in the 1990s.” Law and Society Review 33(3): 517–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kay, Fiona, Cristi Masuch, and Paula Curry. 2006. “Growing Diversity and Emergent Change: Gender and Ethnicity in the Legal Profession.” Pp. 203–236 in Calling for Change: Women, Law and the Legal Profession, ed. Sheehy, E. and McIntyre, S.. Ottawa, ON: University of Ottawa Press.Google Scholar

Kazimirchuk, Vladimir. 1980. “Sociology of Law: Subject-Matter, Structure and Functions.” Pp. 55–63 in Marxist Conception of Law, ed. Fedoseyev, P. N., Grigulevich, I. R., and Maslova, N. I.. Moscow: USSR Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar

Kelly, Erin and Dobbin, Frank. 1999. “Civil Rights Law at Work: Sex Discrimination and the Rise of Maternity Leave Policies.” American Journal of Sociology 105(2): 455–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kelman, Mark. 1984. “Trashing.” Stanford Law Review 36: 293–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kelsen, Hans. 1912. “Zur Soziologie des Rechtes: Kritische Betrachtungen.” Archiv für Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik 34: 601–614.Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans. 1915. “Eine Grundlegung der Rechtssoziologie.” Archiv für Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik 39: 839–879.Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans. 1955. The Communist Theory of Law. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar

Kennedy, Duncan. 1983. Legal Education and the Reproduction of Hierarchy: A Polemic against the System. Cambridge, MA: Afar.Google Scholar

Kennedy, Duncan. 1997. A Critique of Adjudication (Fin de Siècle). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Kennedy, Duncan. 1998. “Law and Economics from the Perspective of Critical Legal Studies.” Pp. 465–474 in The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics and the Law, Vol. II, ed. Newman, P.. New York: Stockton Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kettler, David. 1984. “Sociological Classics and the Contemporary State of the Law.” Review Essay. Canadian Journal of Sociology/Cahiers Canadiens de Sociologie 9(4): 447–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kidder, Robert L. 1983. Connecting Law and Society. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

King, Michael, and Schutz, Anton. 1994. “The Ambitious Modesty of Niklas Luhmann.” Journal of Law and Society 21(3): 261–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

King, Michael, and Thornhill, Chris. 2006. Luhmann on Law and Politics: Critical Appraisals and Applications. Portland, OR: Oxford.Google Scholar

King, Ryan D. 2007. “The Context of Minority Group Threat: Race, Institutions, and Complying with Hate Crime Law.” Law and Society Review 41(1): 189–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klug, Heinz. 2005. “Transnational Human Rights: Exploring the Persistence and Globalization of Human Rights.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 1: 85–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kojder, Andrzej. 2006. “Leon Petrazycki's Socio-legal Ideas and their Contemporary Continuation.” Journal of Classical Sociology 6: 333–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kojder, Andrzej, and Kwasniewski, Jerzy. 1985. “The Development of the Sociology of Law in Poland.” International Journal of the Sociology of Law 13(3): 261–272.Google Scholar

Kraska, Peter B., and Kappeler, Victor E.. 1997. “Militarizing American Police: The Rise and Normalization of Paramilitary Units.” Social Problems 44(1): 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kritzer, Herbert M. 1999. “The Professions are Dead, Long Live the Professions: Legal Practice in a Postprofessional World.” Law and Society Review 33(3): 713–759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kronman, Anthony T. 1983. Max Weber. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Krygier, Martin. 2002. “Selznick's Subjects.” Pp. 3–16 in Legality and Community: On the Intellectual Legacy of Philip Selznick, ed. Kagan, R. A., Krygier, M., and Winston, K.. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar

Kurczewski, Jacek. 2001. “Sociology of Law in Poland.” The American Sociologist 32(2): 85–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laband, David N., and Lentz, Bernard F.. 1993. “Is there Sex Discrimination in the Legal Profession? Further Evidence on Tangible and Intangible Margins.” The Journal of Human Resources 28(2): 230–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lande, Jerzy. 1975. “The Sociology of Petyrazycki.” Pp. 23–37 in Sociology and Jurisprudence of Leon Petrazycki, ed. Gorecki, J.. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar

Lande, John. 2002. “Using Dispute System Design Methods to Promote Good-Faith Participation in Court-Connected Mediation Programs.” UCLA Law Review 50: 69–141.Google Scholar

Lande, John. 2005a. “Shifting the Focus from the Myth of ‘the Vanishing Trial’ to Complex Conflict Management Systems, or I Learned Almost Everything I Need to Know about Conflict Resolution from Marc Galanter.” Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution 6: 191–212.Google Scholar

Lande, John. 2005b. “Procedures for Building Quality into Court Mediation Programs.” Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation 23: 17–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lande, John. 2006. “How Much Justice Can We Afford? Defining the Courts' Roles and Deciding the Appropriate Number of Trials, Settlement Signals, and Other Elements Needed to Administer Justice.” Journal of Dispute Resolution (1): 213–252.Google Scholar

Langer, Rosanna. 1998. “The Juridification and Technicisation of Alternative Dispute Resolution Practices.” Canadian Journal of Law and Society 13(1): 169–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lanza-Kaduce, Lonn, Marvin D. Krohn, Marcia Radosevich, and Ronald L. Akers. 1979. “Law and Durkheimian Order: An Empirical Examination of the Convergence of Legal and Social Definitions of Law.” Pp. 41–61 in Structure, Law, and Power: Essays in the Sociology of Law, ed. Brantingham, P. J. and Kress, J. M.. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Larsen, Nick, and Burtch, Brian, eds. 1999. Law in Society: Canadian Readings. Toronto: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar

Larson, Erik W. 2004. “Institutionalizing Legal Consciousness: Regulation and the Embedding of Market Participants in the Securities Industry in Ghana and Fiji.” Law and Society Review 38(4): 737–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Larson, Magali Sarfatti. 1977. The Rise of Professionalism: A Sociological Analysis. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Lascoumes, Pierre, ed. 1995. Actualité de Max Weber pour la sociologie du droit. Paris: LGDJ.Google Scholar

Lauderdale, Pat, and Larson, Gerald. 1978. “Marxist and ‘Organizational’ Approaches to Delinquency and the Sociology of Law: Crucial Problems in “Testing” the Perspectives.” American Sociological Review 43(6): 922–925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lavi, Shai J. 2005. The Modern Art of Dying: A History of Euthanasia in the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Lechner, Frank J., and Boli, John. 2000. The Globalization Reader. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Lee, Ellie. 1998. Abortion Law and Politics Today. New York: St. Martin's Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lee, Maggy. 2005. “Human Trade and the Criminalization of Irregular Migration.” International Journal of the Sociology of Law 33(1): 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lemert, Charles. 1997. Postmodernism is Not What You Think. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar