Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-x5cpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-25T20:02:08.221Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - A theory of the modern state

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2013

Michael Mann
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles
Get access

Summary

Chapter 1 distinguishes clearly between military and political power. Yet modern states seem to merge the two, since they formally monopolize the means of military violence. This did not end the autonomy of military power organization, as Chapters 12 and 21 make clear, but it redirected it through organizations that were formally the state's. Hence this chapter treats military power within a broader discussion of political power.

I review five current theories of the state, plus the political concepts of Max Weber. I then proceed in three stages to my own theory. I begin with an “institutional” definition of the state and seek to specify the many institutional particularities of modern states. Then I seek to simplify this complexity by moving to a “functional” analysis, offering a polymorphous view of state functions. I assert that modern states “crystallized” (over the area covered in this volume) in several principal forms. Responding to the other three sources of social power, they crystallized as capitalist, as moral-ideological, and as militarist. Responding to their own political struggles, they crystallized at variable points on two continua, one “representative,” running in this period from autocratic monarchy to party democracy; the other “national,” from centralized nation-state to a loosely confederal regime. Most diffusely, they also crystallized as patriarchal, regulating gender and family relations. Finally, I discuss whether we can detect relations of hierarchy among these, so that one or more crystallizations may ultimately determine the overall character of the state.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrams, P. 1988. Notes on the difficulty of studying the state. Journal of Historical Sociology 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albertini, L. 1952, 1956, 1957. The Origins of the War of 1914, 3 vols. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Alford, R., and R., Friedland. 1985. Powers of Theory: Capitalism, the State, and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Althusser, L. 1971. Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays. London: New Left Books.Google Scholar
Anderson, E. N., and P. R., Anderson. 1967. Political Institutions and Social Change in Continental Europe in the Nineteenth Century. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Beales, D. 1987. Joseph II. Vol. I: In the Shadow of Maria Theresa, 1740–1780. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Beetham, D. 1985. Max Weber and the Theory of Modern Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Bendix, R. 1978. Kings or People: Power and the Mandate to Rule. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Block, F. 1977. The Origins of International Economic Disorder. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Collins, R. 1986. Imperialism and legitimacy: Weber's theory of politics. In his Weberian Sociological Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, R. A. 1956. A Preface to Democratic Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, R. A. 1961. Who Governs? Democracy and Power in an American City. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, R. A. 1977. Polyarchy. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Domhoff, W. 1978. The Powers That Be: Processes of Ruling Class Domination in America. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Dahl, R. A. 1990. The Power Elite and the State. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Easton, D. 1965. A Framework for Political Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Eisenstadt, S. N. 1969. The Political Systems of Empires: The Rise and Fall of the Historical Bureaucratic Societies. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. 1972. Politics and Sociology in the Thought of Max Weber. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giddens, A. 1985. The Nation-State and Violence. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1976. Legitimation Crisis. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Huntington, S. 1968. Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Jessop, B. 1977. Recent theories of the capitalist state. Cambridge Journal of Economics 1.Google Scholar
Jessop, B. 1982. The Capitalist State. Oxford: Martin Robertson.Google Scholar
Jessop, B. 1990. State Theory: Putting the Capitalist State in Its Place. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, R., and J., Nye. 1977. Power and Interdependence. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Kiser, E., and M., Hechter. 1991. The role of general theory in comparative-historical sociology. American Journal of Sociology 97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krasner, S. D. 1978. Defending the National Interest: Raw Materials Investments and U.S. Foreign Policy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Krasner, S. D. 1984. Approaches to the state: alternative conceptions and historical dynamics. Comparative Politics 16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krasner, S. D. 1985. Structural Conflict: The Third World Against Global Liberalism. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Laumann, E. O., and D., Knoke. 1987. The Organizational State. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Levi, M. 1988. Of Rule and Revenue. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lipset, S. M. 1959. Political Man. London: Mercury Books.Google Scholar
Lipson, C. 1985. Standing Guard: Protecting Foreign Capital in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Maclver, R. M. 1926. The Modern State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Maier, C. 1981. The two postwar eras and the conditions for stability in twentieth-century Western Europe. American Historical Review 86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, M. 1988. States, War and Capitalism. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Marshall, T. H. 1963. Sociology at the Crossroads and Other Essays. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Marx, K., and F., Engels. 1968. Selected Works. Moscow: Progress Publishers.Google Scholar
Mayer, A. J. 1981. The Persistence of the Old Regime. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Miliband, R. 1969. The State in Capitalist Society. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Mills, C. W. 1956. The Power Elite. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mommsen, W. 1984. The Age of Bureaucracy: Perspectives on the Political Sociology of Max Weber. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Morgenthau, H. 1978. Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for War and Peace, 5th ed. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Mosca, G. 1939. The Ruling Class. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
O'Connor, J. 1973. The Fiscal Crisis of the State. New York: St. Martin's Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Offe, C. 1972. Political authority and class structure: an analysis of late capitalist societies. International Journal of Sociology 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Offe, C. 1974. Structural problems of the capitalist state. In German Political Studies, vol. 1, ed. K., Von Beyme. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Offe, C., and V., Ronge. 1982. Theses on the theory of the state. In Classes, Power and Conflict, ed. A., Giddens and D., Held. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Oppenheimer, F. 1975. The State. New York: Free Life Editions.Google Scholar
Padgett, J. F. 1981. Hierarchy and ecological control in federal budgetary decision making. American Journal of Sociology 87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poggi, G. 1990. The State. Its Nature, Development and Prospectus. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Poulantzas, N. 1973. Political Power and Social Classes. London: New Left Books.Google Scholar
Poulantzas, N. 1978. Political Power and Social Classes. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Rokkan, S. 1970. Citizens, Elections, Parties: Approaches to the Comparative Study of the Processes of Development. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
Rosecrance, R. 1986. The Rise of the Trading State: Commerce and Conquest in the Modern World. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Rosenau, J. 1966. Pre-theories and theories of foreign policy. In Approaches to Comparative and International Politics, ed. R. B., Farrell. Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Rueschemeyer, D., and P., Evans. 1985. The state in economic transformation: towards an analysis of the conditions underlying effective transformation. In Bringing the State Back In, ed. P., Evans, D., Rueschemeyer, and T., Skocpol. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shaw, M. 1984. War, imperialism and the state-system: a critique of orthodox Marxism for the 1980s. In War, State and Society, ed. M., Shaw. Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, M. 1988. Dialectics of War: An Essay on the Social Theory of War and Peace. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Skocpol, T. 1979. States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia, and China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skocpol, T. 1985. Bringing the state back in: strategies of analysis in current research. In Bringing the State Back In, ed. P., Evans, D., Rueschemeyer, and T., Skocpol. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Steinmetz, G. 1990. The myth and the reality of an autonomous state: industrialists, Junkers and social policy in Imperial Germany. Comparative Social Research 12.Google Scholar
Tilly, C. 1975. As Sociology Meets History. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Tilly, C. 1990. Coercion, Capital and European States, AD 990–1990. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Trimberger, E. K. 1978. Revolution from Above: Military Bureaucrats and Development in Japan, Turkey, Egypt and Peru. New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Books.Google Scholar
Weber, M. 1978. Economy and Society, 2 vols. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Weir, M., and T., Skocpol. 1985. State structures and the possibilities for “Keynesian” responses to the Great Depression in Sweden, Britain and the United States. In Bringing the State Back In, ed. P., Evans, D., Rueschemeyer, and T., Skocpol. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Weir, M., et al. 1988. The Politics of Social Policy in the United States. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wolfe, A. 1977. The Limits of Legitimacy: Political Contradictions of Contemporary Capitalism. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Zeitlin, M. 1980. On classes, class conflict, and the state: an introductory note. In Classes, Class Conflict and the State: Empirical Studies in Class Analysis, ed. M., Zeitlin. Cambridge, Mass.: Winthrop.Google Scholar
Zeitlin, M. 1984. The Civil Wars in Chile. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • A theory of the modern state
  • Michael Mann, University of California, Los Angeles
  • Book: The Sources of Social Power
  • Online publication: 05 July 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139381314.005
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • A theory of the modern state
  • Michael Mann, University of California, Los Angeles
  • Book: The Sources of Social Power
  • Online publication: 05 July 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139381314.005
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • A theory of the modern state
  • Michael Mann, University of California, Los Angeles
  • Book: The Sources of Social Power
  • Online publication: 05 July 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139381314.005
Available formats
×